Cochlear implants in children

Cochlear implants allow the rehabilitation of children with severe to profound hearing loss. They are beneficial for not only postlingual children with hearing loss but also for children with congenital or prelingual hearing loss. Issues regarding cochlear implant candidacy and surgery are discussed. The results of cochlear implants in children and the complications related to cochlear implant surgery in children are reviewed.     

Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability

The use of cochlear implants, especially for prelingually deafened children, has aroused heated debate. Members and proponents of Deaf culture vigorously oppose implants both as a seriously invasive treatment of dubious efficacy and as a threat to Deaf culture. Some find these arguments persuasive; others do not. And in this context arise questions about the extent to which individuals with disabilities may decline treatments to ameliorate disabling conditions. When they do so, to what extent may they call upon society to provide supportive services and accommodations?     

Mother father deaf: the heritage of difference

Almost 90% of the children born to life-long profoundly deaf parents are hearing. Within this extraordinary family setting, hearing children of deaf parents are exposed to and interact with two differing cultural, social and linguistic systems: that of their deaf parents and the Deaf community, and that of hearing peers and adults. The present paper focuses on cultural identity and affiliation of hearing children of deaf parents--a population whose lives incorporate the paradox of being culturally 'Deaf' and yet functionally hearing. Data reported here are primarily based on interviews and life histories with 150 adult hearing children of deaf parents throughout the United States. The informants in this study provide an opportunity to explore the parameters and norms of Deaf culture as it contrasts and conflicts with those of Hearing culture.     

Audition and visual attention: the developmental trajectory in deaf and hearing populations

This study examined the development of visual attention in 5- to 13-year-olds who differed in their access to sound. Hearing children, deaf children with cochlear implants, and deaf children without implants participated in a task in which they were to respond to some visual signals and not others. The results of Experiment I indicated that the timing of developmental changes in visual selective attention was similar for all 3 groups, occurring around 8 years. The magnitude of age-related change differed among groups; hearing children and older deaf children using a cochlear implant reached higher levels of performance with age than did deaf children without enhanced access to sound. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the developmental differences between deaf children with and without cochlear implants begin prior to 8 years and may be related to their use of environmental sounds to organize visual attention.     

Improvements in speech perception by children with profound prelingual hearing loss: effects of device, communication mode, and chronological age

The present investigation expanded on an earlier study by Miyamoto, Osberger, Todd, Robbins, Karasek, et al. (1994) who compared the speech perception skills of two groups of children with profound prelingual hearing loss. The first group had received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant and was tested longitudinally. The second group, who were not implanted and used conventional hearing aids, was tested at a single point in time. In the present study, speech perception scores were examined over time for both groups of children as a function of communication mode of the child. Separate linear regressions of speech perception scores as a function of age were computed to estimate the rate of improvement in speech perception abilities that might be expected due to maturation for the hearing aid users (n=58) within each communication mode. The resulting regression lines were used to compare the estimated rate of speech perception growth for each hearing aid group to the observed gains in speech perception made by the children with multichannel cochlear implants. A large number of children using cochlear implants (n=74) were tested over a long period of implant use (m=3.5 years) that ranged from zero to 8.5 years. In general, speech perception scores for the children using cochlear implants were higher than those predicted for a group of children with 101-110 dB HL of hearing loss using hearing aids, and they approached the scores predicted for a group of children with 90-100 dB HL of hearing loss using hearing aids.     

Implant cochléaire et développement des échanges conversationnels.

Most researches conducted in the field of postimplant assessment have focused on the restoration of perceptual capabilities and the development of verbal language. In contrast, only very few studies have examined the impact of a cochlear implantation on children's overall development and, in particular, on their conversational language abilities. However, some previous works on the preverbal development revealed the recurrent difficulties experienced by deaf children in acquiring knowledge of social rules and social skills relative to speech activities. In children with profound bilateral deafness, a conventional hearing aid is not enough to provide sufficiently relevant information for a satisfactory development of oral communication. In such situations, the most suitable way of improving hearing is the use of a cochlear implant. The authors therefore hypothesized that access to oral perception will not only improve implanted children's social skills, but will also increase their rate of participation and the use of verbal language in their interaction with a familiar adult (mother or father). Their communication skills profile would resemble that of younger normal hearing children. Using conversational samples from a video-filming protocol at specific intervals, the authors monitored the development of communication skills in a group of 20 prelingually, profoundly deaf children (mean age: 3.7 years). Results corroborated our hypothesis. They indicated that children using cochlear implants increased their overall performance in communication skills, quantitatively and qualitatively speaking, even at the first year postimplantation stage. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative performance of 12 children who demonstrated some open-set speech recognition skills before receiving a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant with a view toward expanding the selection criteria for cochlear implant candidacy to include children who derive minimal benefit from amplification. DESIGN: Pre- and postoperative performance of two groups of children were compared. Group 1 consisted of 12 children who demonstrated some open-set speech recognition skills before receiving a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant (Borderline group). Group 2 consisted of 12 children who demonstrated no open-set speech recognition skills before implantation with a Nucleus device (Traditional group). In all children, candidacy was determined based on preimplant binaural aided performance. For most subjects, the poorer ear was selected for implantation. Mean pre- and postoperative speech recognition scores of the Borderline subjects were compared to determine the benefit provided by their cochlear implants. Secondly, matched-pair analyses were used to compare the mean speech recognition scores obtained by the Borderline and Traditional subjects. RESULTS: The scores of the Borderline group improved significantly on five of six speech recognition measures when 6 mo postoperative scores obtained with the implant were compared with preoperative test scores obtained with hearing aids. By the 12 mo postoperative interval, the scores of the Borderline group had improved significantly (p < 0.05) on all six measures. In contrast, scores obtained by the Traditional group had improved significantly on three of six measures at both the 6 and 12 mo postoperative intervals. Comparison of postoperative test scores revealed that the Borderline group scored significantly higher than the Traditional group on three of six measures at the 6 mo test interval and on six of six measures at the 12 mo test interval (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that both groups derive significant benefit from their cochlear implants. Although the mean preoperative audiograms for the implanted ears did not differ significantly for the two groups of subjects, members of the Borderline group exhibited significantly better speech recognition skills than the Traditional group during the first year after implantation. These findings suggest that the increased auditory experience of the Borderline subjects positively influenced their performance with a cochlear implant. The authors advocate that the selection criteria used to determine pediatric cochlear implant candidacy be broadened to include consideration of children who demonstrate minimal open-set speech recognition skills.     

Cochlear implantation: a review of the literature and the Nijmegen results

The field of cochlear implantation is developing rapidly. In subjects with bilateral profound deafness who gain no benefit from conventional hearing aids the aim of cochlear implantation is to provide a means for them to receive auditory sensations. Throughout the world, most cochlear implant centres are still continuing their research efforts to improve the results with this technique. Although it is still difficult to predict how an individual will perform with a cochlear implant, the success of cochlear implantation can no longer be denied. In this paper, we review some recent papers and reports, and the results of the various Nijmegen cochlear implant studies. Data about subject selection, examinations, surgery and the outcome are discussed. Our results were in good agreement with those of other authors. It can be concluded once again that cochlear implantation is an effective treatment for postlingually deaf adults and children, and for prelingually (congenital or acquired) deaf children with profound bilateral sensorineural deafness.     

Cochlear implants: selection criteria and shifting borders

Cochlear implants have proven to be effective and reliable in postlingually deaf adults. This is also true for congenitally deaf and perilingually deaf children up to the age of six years. Due to the increasing experience, the improvement of implant technology and the proven reliability the selection criteria are broadened with shifting borders. The main extensions are related to age, additional handicaps, residual hearing and special etiologies of deafness. Increasing evidence shows that very early implantation results in better performance and better hearing and speech development. Near-normal language acquisition can be achieved in children implanted under the age of four. Additional handicaps do not automatically exclude a candidate from cochlear implantation. A case-to-case decision has to be made based on additional diagnostics and the experience of the implant centre. A list of suitable handicaps is provided. Severely hearing impaired patients may also be considered for cochlear implantation if their residual hearing provides no benefit for speech discrimination. The same holds true for children. Cochlear implantation in obliterated cochleae and inner ear malformation requires a special surgical technique and special electrode arrays. In this way even difficult cases can be managed with remarkable outcome. Over all, the selection criteria have been broadened with increasing experience and technological improvement. This development may continue and the borderline between hearing aids and cochlear implants will shift further towards severe hearing loss. However, the basis for success still remains good rehabilitation, a team approach and the willingness of the patient to undergo the whole process of cochlear implantation.     

Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: This study compares auditory performance between original and replacement cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data from 18 U.S. cochlear implant programs were obtained by retrospective chart review. Patients received and returned subjective questionnaires. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight adults with once-functioning Nucleus 22 cochlear implants that failed received replacement Nucleus 22 cochlear implants in the same ears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective measures included sentence (CID Everyday Sentences or Iowa Sentences) and monosyllabic word (NU-6 Words or CNC Words) speech discrimination scores. Patients also rated and compared performance using subjective scales. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of patients had significantly higher sentence or word scores with their replacement cochlear implants than with their original implants, 26% had no significant change, and 37% had significantly poorer scores. Subjectively, 57% of patients reported that the performance of their replacement device was better or the same and 43% reported that it was poorer. There was no correlation between performance with the replacement cochlear implant and cause of the original device failure, duration of original device use before failure, surgical complications with either implantation, changes in electrode insertion depths, or preoperative variables, such as age, etiology, or duration of deafness. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition ability with a replacement cochlear implant may significantly increase or decrease from that with the original implant. Experienced cochlear implant patients facing reimplantation must be counseled regarding the possibility of differences in sound quality and speech recognition performance with their replacement device.     

Cochlear implants in children

Cochlear implants are no longer considered new or experimental technology. Difficulty in evaluating the degree of hearing loss and response to traditional forms of amplification in young children makes pediatric cochlear implant candidacy a complex issue. Cochlear implantation and, in particular, pediatric cochlear implantation, requires a team commitment with contributions from surgeons, audiologists, speech pathologists, psychologists, and special educators. Elements discussed include assessment and candidacy issues, surgical technique, elements of a cochlear implant team, outcome assessment, and potential complications. The decision to perform pediatric cochlear implantation should not be undertaken without serious consideration to the enormous commitment required in both financial and personnel terms.     

Speech perception test in Italian language for profoundly deaf children

Speech perception tests are an important part of procedures for diagnosing pre-verbal hearing loss. Merely establishing a child's hearing threshold with and without a hearing aid is not sufficient to ensure an adequate evaluation with a view to selecting cases suitable for cochlear implants because it fails to indicate the real benefit obtained from using a conventional hearing aid reliably. Speech perception tests have proved useful not only for patient selection, but also for subsequent evaluation of the efficacy of new hearing aids, such as tactile devices and cochlear implants. In clinical practice, the tests most commonly adopted with small children are: The Auditory Comprehension Test (ACT), Discrimination after Training (DAT), Monosyllable, Trochee, Spondee tests (MTS), Glendonald Auditory Screening Priocedure (GASP), Early Speech Perception Test (ESP), Rather than considering specific results achieved in individual cases, reference is generally made to the four speech perception classes proposed by Moog and Geers of the CID of St. Louis. The purpose of this classification, made on the results obtained with suitably differentiated tests according to the child's age and language ability, is to detect differences in perception of a spoken message in ideal listening conditions. To date, no italian language speech perception test has been designed to establish the assessment of speech perception level in children with profound hearing impairment. We attempted, therefore, to adapt the existing English tests to the Italian language taking into consideration the differences between the two languages. Our attention focused on the ESP test since it can be applied to even very small children (2 years old). The ESP is proposed in a standard version for hearing-impaired children over the age of 6 years and in a simplified version for younger children. The rationale we used for selecting Italian words reflect the rationale established for the original version, but the choice of single words follows different criteria from the original version. In fact, the two languages differ in important linguistic features so that the test can not be not adapted to the Italian language by simply translating the words involved. As currently there is no children's language dictionary in Italian arranged according to age bracket, we chose words used in children and in pre-school reading material.     

Sibling relationships for deaf children: The impact of child and family characteristics.

Objective: To examine factors that affect relationships between deaf children who use cochlear implants or hearing aids and their hearing siblings. Study Design: Qualitative analysis of interview data from parents of deaf children. Participants: Parents of 29 deaf children with at least 1 sibling; 20 children used cochlear implants and 9 used hearing aids. Main Outcome Measure: Quality of deaf-hearing sibling relationships as assessed by an ordinal scale developed by the authors. Results: Birth order, family size, parents' anxiety about deafness, and negative comparisons by parents of hearing and deaf siblings were key factors in sibling relationships. Conclusions: Family context is important in understanding experiences of deaf children and their hearing siblings. The model replaces assumptions of hearing loss as individual disability with an emphasis on the social determinants of managing differences in siblings' hearing status. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Implantation of the lateral cochlear wall for auditory nerve stimulation

Although cochlear implants now regularly achieve gratifying results, traditional intrascalar implants have certain limitations. Extraluminal implants may offset some of these problems by accessing neurons subserving a wider tonotopic range, avoiding intracochlear insertion trauma, and offering alternatives when cochlear obliteration is present. We have investigated the utility of a lateral cochlear wall implant in a normal-hearing cat model with implants at the middle and basal turns, and found successful activation of the auditory nerve at thresholds of 28.1 and 40.6 microA, respectively. No adventitial stimulation of the facial nerve was noted within the dynamic range. Maximum responsiveness was observed with implants of the middle turn of the cochlea, an area that is not reliably approached with current intrascalar implants. These observations support and extend prior observations of the feasibility of extraluminal stimulation of the auditory nerve.     

Criteria and procedures for selection of children with acquired or congenital deafness for cochlear implants in Europe

The Nucleus Mini System 22 cochlear implant has been implanted in over 2,000 children worldwide. Selection criteria have evolved similar to that for adults since implantation in children began in 1985. The appropriate selection of children for implantation is made by a professional pediatric team which considers audiological and non-audiological issues in determining if the child is a cochlear implant candidate. The main philosophy is to establish if the child has the potential to benefit from a cochlear implant.     

Ethical issues in the practice of child psychotherapy.

Reviews literature relevant to the ethics of child psychotherapy, paying particular attention to the setting of the community mental health center. It is felt that the American Psychological Association's (1977) Ethical Standards of Psychologists, if applied to children, does more to create ambiguity than to answer questions. Although in the past, the right of informed consent pertaining to confidentiality, testing and diagnosis, and treatment have often been denied to children, current legal and ethical trends seem to grant greater rights to children in these areas. It is suggested that the role of the child psychotherapist should be expanded to include not only the practice of traditional child psychotherapy but also the roles of child advocate, information provider to children and the community, social/political/legal change agent, and researcher. An advisory committee with responsibility to deal with ethical dilemmas is supported. (23 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing

Current multichannel cochlear implant devices provide high levels of speech performance in quiet. However, performance deteriorates rapidly with increasing levels of background noise. The goal of this study was to investigate whether the noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users is primarily due to the loss of fine spectral information. Recognition of vowels and consonants was measured as a function of signal-to-noise ratio in four normal-hearing listeners in conditions simulating cochlear implants with both CIS and SPEAK-like strategies. Six conditions were evaluated: 3-, 4-, 8-, and 16-band processors (CIS-like), a 6/20 band processor (SPEAK-like), and unprocessed speech. Recognition scores for vowels and consonants decreased as the S/N level worsened in all conditions, as expected. Phoneme recognition threshold (PRT) was defined as the S/N at which the recognition score fell to 50% of its level in quiet. The unprocessed speech had the best PRT, which worsened as the number of bands decreased. Recognition of vowels and consonants was further measured in three Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users using either their normal SPEAK speech processor or a custom processor with a four-channel CIS strategy. The best cochlear implant user showed similar performance with the CIS strategy in quiet and in noise to that of normal-hearing listeners when listening to correspondingly spectrally degraded speech. These findings suggest that the noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users is at least partly due to the loss of spectral resolution. Efforts to improve the effective number of spectral information channels should improve implant performance in noise.     

Usefulness of ictal and interictal 99mTc ethyl cysteinate dimer single photon emission computed tomography in patients with refractory partial epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the feasibility of recording the electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) evoked by electrical stimulation at the promontory (Prom-EABR) as a tool to assist selection of the ear for cochlear implantation in young children. STUDY DESIGN: The study group consisted of young children for whom the decision to proceed with implantation with the Nucleus mini 22-channel cochlear implant (Cochlear (UK) Ltd., London, UK) had already been made. SETTING: The Prom-EABR was recorded after the children had been anesthetised, but before the start of surgery. PATIENTS: A group of 25 children (11 boys and 14 girls), whose age at implantation ranged from 2 years 11 months to 6 years 8 months (mean age, 4 years 5 months), were investigated. INTERVENTION: Recordings of the Prom-EABR were used to determine which ear would receive the cochlear implant, providing there were no preexisting contraindications regarding selection of the ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: It has been suggested from earlier studies that the characteristics of the amplitude input/output (I/O) function of the EABR are related to neuronal survival. If the ear with the "better" I/O function is chosen for implantation, it might be expected that these children will perform better on average than those in whom the ear has been selected at random. RESULTS: Reliable recordings of the Prom-EABR were achieved in 40 ears (80%) of the 50 ears in the study. In 20 of the 25 children the technique was actively employed for selection of the ear for implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Recording of the Prom-EABR in the operating theater is a viable technique. Future analysis of long-term outcome measures of performance with the implant will confirm or dispute the benefit of ear selection using the Prom-EABR.     

Significant reduction in circuit pressure with modified plasma separation chamber for a heparin removal device

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the maximum dose of radiation the CLARION 1.2 cochlear implant can withstand safely. INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implants restore functional hearing to patients with sensorineural deafness. Because some patients may need radiation therapy, it is important to investigate the influence of ionizing radiation on cochlear implant function. METHODS: This study tested the function of four CLARION 1.2 implants (Advanced Bionics, Sylmar, CA, U.S.A.) after varying radiation treatments with gamma rays. The first implant received a cumulative dosage of 69 Gy over nine treatments (single doses between 0.1-30 Gy). The second was irradiated with a total of 90 Gy, receiving three treatments of 30 Gy each. The third and fourth received doses more typical of patient therapy (i.e., 2 Gy) approximately 30 times, for a cumulative dosage of approximately 60 Gy. Implant function was tested after every treatment; the CLARION implant incorporates a back-telemetry system, allowing impedance and current output testing. RESULTS: Despite the type of treatment, the results were quite consistent: difficulties in function occurred when the cumulative dosage inside the implant was approximately 60 Gy. The first implant recovered completely and the second recovered partially. DISCUSSION: The CLARION 1.2 cochlear implant seems to safely withstand approximately 60 Gy of radiation before experiencing functional difficulties. In a clinical situation, the implant would not likely be in the target volume irradiated, and thus the patient's therapeutic cumulative dosage might be higher.     

Unilateral pulmonary vein atresia in early adulthood

Despite the fact that elderly people live frequently alone and frequently have difficulties of vision, is it reasonable to refuse to supply a patient with a cochlear implant only because he is too old? We compare the results of 87 post-lingually implantees as a function of age, less than 60 years (young) and 60 years or more (old). We assessed the implant efficacy using the Protocole Francophone d'Evaluation (PFE), appreciated the speech-therapist's opinion and the patient's satisfaction, and counted the number of hours per day the implant was used (H/D). The PFE score was significantly higher in young than old. However the speech-therapist's opinion and the patient's satisfaction as well as H/D did not differ significantly in the 2 series. Elderly people are supplied with a great benefit from cochlear implants. Therefore age is not a contraindication for implantation.