共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
为了降低锅炉排烟温度,回收锅炉尾部烟气热量,提高机组效率,降低机组发电煤耗,确保电除尘、引风机安全运行,采用复合相变换热器加热同机组的凝结水,在避免换热器结露积灰的前提下,能大幅度降低锅炉排烟温度,回收锅炉尾部烟气的余热,减少汽轮机的抽汽量,增加机组发电能力,可获得较好的经济效益。 相似文献
2.
3.
Consteel电炉余热锅炉的热平衡计算方法研究 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
针对Consteel电炉余热锅炉烟气入口参数不稳定的特点,得到了余热锅炉的各项热损失、锅炉效率、有效利用热量和蒸发量的计算公式。对65t Consteel电炉炼钢设备余热锅炉进行了热平衡计算,计算表明,锅炉的排烟热损失随烟气入口温度的降低而增加,而锅炉效率、有效利用热量和蒸发量随烟气入口温度的降低而降低,锅炉的平均蒸发量为23.1t/h。 相似文献
4.
有效回收锅炉排烟中的热量,是降低锅炉排烟损失,提高锅炉效率及机组效率的有效途径之一,近年越来越被国内外所重视,并得到越来越广泛的应用。本文介绍了几种烟气余热回收系统的系统特点及应用。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
天然气锅炉极限热效率及排烟热损失分析 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
以陕北天然气为例,在对锅炉各项热损失进行分析的基础上,给出了不同排烟温度下,水蒸气汽化潜热在锅炉排烟热损失中所占的份额大小。并指出,若采取措施将烟气中的潜热加以回收利用,可大幅度提高锅炉的热效率。对于陕北天然气,如果排烟温度降到40℃,烟气中水蒸气汽化潜热的70%可得到回收,锅炉热效率将比排烟温度为180℃~250℃的传统锅炉提高13.5%~16.6%。冷凝式锅炉的热效率提高潜力主要取决于燃料种类、锅炉本体的排烟温度、工艺流体的温度、所需的低品位热能的数量、过量空气系数等。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
在火力发电厂中,由于燃煤质量下降和锅炉换热面积灰等原因造成锅炉排烟温度升高一直是亟待解决的难题之一。以大连某热电厂烟气余热回收工程为例,采用分体式热管换热器回收锅炉排烟余热,用来加热补充除氧器的除盐水,对烟气的回收利用进行技术和经济效益分析。实践应用证明分体式热管换热器在火电厂烟气余热回收中提高机组效率、减少煤耗的可行性和实用性。 相似文献
11.
12.
在合理简化条件下,对国内凝汽式火力发电厂主流炉型亚临界、超临界、超超临界锅炉燃用大同烟煤、开滦烟煤、西山贫煤、阳泉无烟煤、元宝山褐煤的排烟温度升高引起供电煤耗提高的状况进行计算及分析.计算结果表明:当排烟温度升高5℃时,凝汽式电厂的供电煤耗提高约0.567~0.934g/kWh,当煤种相同时,过热蒸汽压力越高,排烟温度... 相似文献
13.
14.
通过对某锅炉的运行现状分析,发现存在运行热效率低、锅炉出力低、排烟温度高、炉渣含碳量高等问题,采取余热利用、锅炉风室改造、水处理设备改造及加强管理人员和锅炉操作人员培训等措施,锅炉热效率提高了11.41%,吨汽耗煤量降低了9.90%,锅炉出力提高了8.63%. 相似文献
15.
16.
Techno‐economic comparison of boiler cold‐end flue gas heat recovery processes for efficient hard‐coal‐fired power generation
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《国际能源研究杂志》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
An important method to increase the efficiency of thermal power plants is to recover the exhaust gas heat at the boiler cold‐end with the stepwise integration of a steam turbine heat regenerative system. To this end, there are currently three typical heat recovery processes, that is, a low‐temperature economizer (LTE), segmented air heating (SAH) and bypass flue (BPF). To provide useful guidance to thermal power plants for optimal and efficient processes, the thermal economy and techno‐economic performance of the three aforementioned processes were calculated and compared using an in‐service 600‐MW hard‐coal‐fired ultra‐supercritical power unit as a reference. The results demonstrate that with the use of the LTE, SAH and BPF, respectively, to recover the exhaust heat, reducing the exhaust temperature from 122 °C to 90 °C, the net standard coal consumption rate of the 600‐MW unit can be reduced by 1.51, 1.71 and 2.81 g/(kW h). The initial costs of the three heat recovery projects are 1.69, 2.91 and 2.53 million USD. If the 600‐MW unit runs 5500 h per year at the rated load, the three processes can increase the earnings of the unit by 0.49, 0.52 and 0.94 million USD from coal savings annually, meaning that their dynamic payback periods are 4.42, 8.66 and 3.29 years, respectively. The results indicate that for a hard‐coal‐fired power unit, the coal savings achieved by exhaust heat recovery are notable. Among the three processes, SAH shows the worst techno‐economic performance because it induces a significant increase in initial costs while obtaining a limited increase in thermal economy, while BPF exhibits the best techno‐economic performance owing to the significant increase in thermal economy. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
17.