The impact of ibuprofen on the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment with hydrochlorothiazide in elderly persons

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may alter blood pressure through their inhibitory effects on prostaglandin biosynthesis. Such potential hypertensive effects of NSAIDs have not been adequately examined in the elderly, who are the largest group of NSAID users. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover trial of ibuprofen (1800 mg per day) vs placebo treatment in patients older than 60 years of age with hypertension controlled with hydrochlorothiazide. While continuing their usual thiazide dosage, subjects were randomized to a 4-week treatment period (ibuprofen or placebo) followed by a 2-week placebo wash-out period and a second 4-week treatment period with the alternative therapy. Supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured weekly. RESULTS: Of 25 randomized subjects, 22 completed the study protocol (mean age = 73 +/- 6.7 years). Supine systolic blood pressure and standing systolic blood pressure were increased significantly with ibuprofen treatment, compared with placebo. Mean supine systolic blood pressures were 143.8 +/- 21.0 and 139.6 +/- 15.9 mmHg on ibuprofen and placebo, respectively (p = .004). Mean standing systolic blood pressures were 148.1 +/- 19.9 and 143.4 +/- 17.9 mmHg on ibuprofen and placebo, respectively (p = .002). CONCLUSION: We conclude that 1800 mg per day of ibuprofen does induce a significant increase in systolic blood pressure in older hypertensive patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide. NSAID therapy may negatively impact the control of hypertension in elderly patients.     

Microalbuminuria in essential hypertensives in treatment for hypertension

Urinary albumin excretion (UAE) was evaluated in 26 subjects with essential hypertension and no diabetes (5 men, 21 women; 19 whites and 7 blacks), with creatinine clearance (Ccreat) > or = 75 ml/min/1.73 m2, in individualized treatment with various antihypertensive drugs. Clinical and laboratorial data were the following: mean age, 53 +/- 2 years (SEM); duration of hypertension, 14.9 +/- 2.2 years; body mass index (BMI), 26.8 +/- 0.7; arterial blood pressure, 142 +/- 4/89 +/- 3 mmHg; serum creatinine, 0.8 +/- 0.03 mg/dL; Ccreat, 99.3 +/- 3.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 and UAE, 9.3 +/- 1.5 micrograms/min. No significant difference was found when data were evaluated for gender and race. Microalbuminuria, defined as UAE > 13.9 micrograms/min, was found in 19% of the hypertensives (range: 16.3 to 28.1 micrograms/min). UAE correlated positively and significantly with systolic (r = 0.6309; P = 0.0005), diastolic (r = 0.4146; P = 0.0352), and mean blood pressure (r = 0.5000; P = 0.0093). The correlation between UAE and systolic pressure was stronger than with diastolic pressure. There was a positive and significant correlation between BMI and UAE values (r = 0.5623; P = 0.0028), and between BMI values with those of systolic (r = 0.5271; P = 0.0057) and mean blood pressure (r = 0.3930; P = 0.470). No correlation was found between UAE and age, duration of hypertension or Ccreat. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures were significantly higher in microalbuminuric than in non microalbuminuric hypertensives. Obese hypertensives presented higher mean values of UAE, systolic, diastolic and mean pressures than non obese.     

Antihypertensive effects of combined lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with systodiastolic or systolic hypertension: results of a multicenter trial

This study was aimed at evaluating the antihypertensive effect of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide administered in the fixed combination of 20 and 12.5 mg, respectively, on clinic and 24-h blood pressure in elderly patients (age, 68.8 +/- 5.8 years, mean +/- SD) with mild-to-moderate essential systodiastolic or isolated systolic hypertension. After a washout period of 4 weeks, patients received once daily lisinopril combined with hydrochlorothiazide for a 6-week period. At the end of the washout and treatment periods, clinic blood pressure was assessed 24 h after dosing, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was monitored, taking blood pressure readings every 15 min. Pretreatment clinic blood pressure was 171.3 +/- 14.0/103.7 +/- 5.1 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) in the group with systodiastolic hypertension (n = 405) and 179.6 +/- 9.4/83.6 +/- 5.4 mm Hg in the group with isolated systolic hypertension (n = 165). The corresponding 24-h average blood pressures were 144.1 +/- 13.9/88.7 +/- 8.4 mm Hg (n = 114) and 150.7 +/- 15.5/80.8 +/- 9.4 mm Hg (n = 40). Clinic blood pressure was significantly reduced by treatment in both groups. This was the case also for ambulatory blood pressure, which was reduced by 9.6 +/- 0.9%/9.9 +/- 0.9% in systodiastolic and by 11.8 +/- 1.3%/8.5 +/- 1.5% in isolated patients with systolic hypertension (p < 0.05 at least for all differences). The antihypertensive effect was similar in patients older and younger than 70 years. In all groups, it was manifest both during the day and the nighttime and was still significant after 24 h. Thus single daily administration of combined lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide effectively reduces blood pressure in elderly patients with hypertension.     

Protective effect of GTS-21, a novel nicotinic receptor agonist, on delayed neuronal death induced by ischemia in gerbils

BACKGROUND: The difference between clinic and ambulatory average daytime blood pressures is frequently taken as a surrogate measure of the 'white-coat effect' (i.e. the pressor reaction triggered in the patient by the physician's visit). OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of this difference and its relationship with clinic and average ambulatory daytime blood pressure levels. DESIGN AND METHODS: These issues were addressed with two large groups of subjects in whom both clinic and ambulatory blood pressures were measured, namely 783 outpatients with systolic and diastolic essential hypertension [Group 1, aged 50.8+/-9.4 years (mean +/- SD)], participating in standardized Italian trials of antihypertensive drugs, and 506 elderly patients (group 2, age 71+/-7 years) with isolated systolic hypertension, participating in the European Syst-Eur trial. RESULTS: The clinic-daytime blood pressure difference for the essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients (group 1) was 13.6+/-14.3 mmHg for systolic and 9.1+/-8.6 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P always < 0.01). This difference for the elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (group 2) was 21.2+/-16.0 mmHg for systolic and only 1.3+/-10.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). In both studies little or no systematic clinic-daytime difference could be observed for heart rate. The reproducibility of the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference, tested for 108 essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients from group 1 and 128 isolated systolic hypertensives from group 2, was invariably lower than that both of daytime and of clinic blood pressure values. Finally, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference was progressively higher for increasing levels of clinic blood pressure and progressively lower for higher levels of ambulatory daytime blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference has a limited reproducibility; depends not only on clinic but also on daytime average blood pressure, which means that its size is a function of the blood pressure criteria employed for selection of the patients in a trial; and is never associated with a systematic clinic-daytime difference in heart rate, which further questions its use as a reliable surrogate measure of the true pressor response induced in the patient by the doctor's visit.     

Effects of amlodipine on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure profiles, electrocardiographic monitoring, and left ventricular mass and function in black patients with very severe hypertension

In a 3-month, open-label study, 54 consecutive black patients with very severe hypertension were treated with amlodipine. Very severe hypertension was defined as an average sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or = 115 mmHg and < or = 140 mmHg as a mean of 10 readings over a 30-minute period using an automatic BP measuring device and a mean 24-hour diastolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) > or = 110 mmHg and < or = 140 mmHg). Serial changes in 24-hour ABP and electrocardiographic monitoring, left ventricular (LV) mass index, and LV systolic function were evaluated. Mean 24-hour ABP was reduced from 181 +/- 14/119 +/- 6 to 140 +/- 15/92 +/- 9 mmHg at 3 months (P < 0.0001). Target BP (mean 24-hour diastolic ABP < 90 mmHg) was achieved in 35% of the patients. The reduction in BP was sustained for 24 hours after drug administration. Simultaneous BP measurements using the automatic BP measuring device were significantly different from the ABP measurements before and after treatment, suggesting a marked "white coat" pressor effect. At baseline, frequent or complex ventricular arrhythmias (> 30 ventricular extrasystoles per hour, ventricular couplets) were present in 2 (4%) patients, with no significant change after treatment. Left ventricular mass index regressed from 140 +/- 50 to 111 +/- 30 g/m2 at 3 months (P < 0.03); LV performance was not adversely affected. Adverse effects were few and tended to disappear during the treatment period. All of the clinical laboratory parameters tested remained unchanged. In this group of patients, treatment with amlodipine showed a marked and sustained antihypertensive action as demonstrated by 24-hour ABP monitoring, and was well tolerated and associated with LV mass regression without adverse effect on systolic cardiac function. Further, a low rate of complex ventricular arrhythmias was documented.     

The hypertension of autonomic failure and its treatment

We studied the incidence and severity of supine hypertension in 117 patients with severe primary autonomic failure presenting to a referral center over a 9-year period. Patients were uniformly characterized by disabling orthostatic hypotension, lack of compensatory heart rate increase, abnormal autonomic function tests, and unresponsive plasma norepinephrine. Fifty-four patients had isolated autonomic impairment (pure autonomic failure). Sixty-three patients had central nervous system involvement in addition to autonomic impairment (multiple-system atrophy). Patients were studied off medications, in a metabolic ward, and on a controlled diet containing 150 mEq of sodium. Fifty-six percent of patients had supine diastolic blood pressure > or =90 mm Hg. The prevalence of hypertension was slightly greater in females (63%) than in males (52%). Potential mechanisms responsible for this hypertension were investigated. No correlation was found between blood volume and blood pressure. Similarly, plasma norepinephrine (92+/-15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3+/-0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in the subset of patients with pure autonomic failure and supine hypertension (mean systolic/diastolic pressure, 177 +/- 6/108 +/- 2 mm Hg, range 167/97 to 219/121). Supine hypertension represents a challenge in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. We found these patients to be particularly responsive to the hypotensive effects of transdermal nitroglycerin. Doses ranging from 0.025 to 0.1 mg/h decreased systolic blood pressure by 36+/-7 mm Hg and may effectively treat supine hypertension overnight, but the dose should be individualized and used with caution.     

Amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine in the treatment of Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension

Optimal treatment of hypertension requires the use of effective antihypertensive drugs. Calcium channel blockers are widely used in the treatment of hypertension and appear to be particularly efficacious in ethnic Chinese patients. The aim of this open-label study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and tolerability of three dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in sequence, using the same protocol for each. After 2 weeks of placebo treatment, 73 males and 45 females (mean age, 45 +/- 10 years; mean weight, 67 +/- 10 kg) with essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 115 mm Hg) were treated with amlodipine (n = 41), felodipine (n = 38), or isradipine (n = 39) for 8 weeks, with dose titration after 4 weeks. Mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 23/17, 30/17, and 20/15 mm Hg after 8 weeks of treatment with amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine, respectively. These reductions were all statistically significant. Blood pressure was controlled (defined as diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg at the final visit or a decrease from baseline of > or = 10 mm Hg) in 85%, 74%, and 74% of patients receiving amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine, respectively. There were no significant changes in heart rate, plasma lipid levels, or serum biochemistry markers with any of the three treatments. No serious adverse events occurred, but mild adverse effects, including headaches, flushing, tachycardia, dizziness, and edema, were reported; 1 (2%), 6 (16%), and 5 (13%) patients receiving amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine, respectively, withdrew from the study (P < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that all three drugs are highly effective in lowering blood pressure and are well tolerated in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.     

Arterial pressure variability in the acute phase of a cerebral stroke

OBJECTIVE: Acute stroke may cause hypertension and recently available devices for noninvasive blood pressure monitoring make it possible to study short-term variability of pressure in this condition. DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight patients (5 males, 3 females, mean age 66 +/- 12 years) with haemorrhagic stroke and 13 male patients (mean age 73 +/- 10 years) with thrombo-embolic stroke underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in the acute stage by the Takeda Medical 2420 (A&D Co., Japan), programmed to measure blood pressure every 10 min during day-time and 15 min during night-time. Blood pressure variability was measured by the variability coefficient (standard deviation/24 h mean). The diagnosis was confirmed in all cases by Computed Tomography scanning. Statistical differences between groups were evaluated by Student's "t" test for independent samples. RESULTS: In haemorrhagic stroke the mean of variability coefficient proved be 10.7% for systolic and 12.8% for diastolic blood pressure, whereas in thromboembolic stroke it was 14.1% for systolic and 17.7% for diastolic blood pressure. The difference between means was statistically significant (p < 0.02 for systolic and p < 0.01 for diastolic blood pressure). CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure variability is greater in thrombo-embolic, than haemorrhagic stroke. The hypervariability can be misleading in judging the hypertensive state in this condition.     

Current status of antihypertensive therapy for elderly patients in Japan

To assess how elderly Japanese hypertensive patients are treated by specialists, we conducted a cross-sectional survey. A total of 1,163 outpatients aged 50 years or older were studied. Hypertension was diagnosed in 939 of these patients, and 827 were receiving drug therapy. The average blood pressure during therapy was 143 +/- 16/81 +/- 10 mmHg. In patients aged 70 years or older, systolic blood pressure during antihypertensive therapy was significantly higher (p < 0.01) and diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than the corresponding values in those aged 50 to 59 years or 60 to 69 years. The calculated mean blood pressures were similar in the different age groups. The rate of monotherapy in the patients aged 70 years or older was 58.8%, which was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the rates of monotherapy in the other age groups. Calcium channel blockers were prescribed in about 80% of patients, irrespective of age or comorbidity. Of the patients receiving calcium channel blockers, 43.5% were treated with monotherapy. This rate significantly (p < 0.01) increased with advancing age. Diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in patients with stroke and in those with ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidemia, as compared with patients with no comorbidity. Among patients aged 70 years or older, the difference in systolic blood pressure between those with ischemic heart disease and those with no comorbidity was not significant. Blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients was reduced to a level similar to that in younger patients. The target blood pressure was influenced by the presence of comorbidity. Furthermore, specialists showed a high preference for the use of calcium channel blockers in the management of hypertension.     

Reducing blood pressure and modification of coronary risk factors by therapy with doxazosin

In an open, non-comparative, multicenter trail performed by general practitioners, the efficacy and safety of doxazosin, an inhibitor of postsynaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptors, were studied in 924 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Under treatment with doxazosin both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly from 178.4 +/- 18.2/103.1 +/- 8.6 to 149.1 +/- 12.0/85.6 +/- 7.3 mm Hg; the mean daily dose at the end of the 12 weeks' treatment period was 3.3 +/- 2.6 mg. Heart rate decreased by 5% and body weight by 6%. As compared with baseline values, total cholesterol (255.7 +/- 45.4 vs 232.7 +/- 37.3 mg%), triglycerides (206.3 +/- 97.6 vs 175.2 +/- 70.9 mg%) and blood glucose (101.9 +/- 31.0 vs 97.9 +/- 25.5 mg%) decreased significantly, whilst HDL-cholesterol (47.7 +/- 13.0 vs 51.5 +/- 12.4 mg%) increased. Overall, doxazosin was very well tolerated; only 16% of all patients reported adverse drug reactions. The results of this study confirm the effectiveness of doxazosin as first-line medication in the treatment of hypertension, especially in patients with concomitant metabolic disorders such as hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. Moreover, the patients who appear to benefit most from doxazosin treatment are those who show the highest metabolism-related coronary risk, as calculated according to the Framingham Study equation.     

Laparoscopic repair of chronic traumatic diaphragmatic hernia: case report and review of the literature

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of nisoldipine coat core (CC) 10-40 mg o.d. and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25-50 mg o.d. Patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension received either nisoldipine CC 10 mg o.d. or HCTZ 25 mg o.d. Treatment was titrated at two-weekly intervals as necessary. The primary efficacy endpoint was a defined reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Response rates were similar for both the nisoldipine CC- and HCTZ-treated groups (74% and 70%, respectively). Secondary efficacy endpoints were reductions in both diastolic and systolic blood pressures (SBP). At treatment endpoint, the change from baseline in SBP was 16.2 mmHg for the nisoldipine CC group and 14.9 mmHg for the HCTZ group. Both drugs were well tolerated, and adverse events were generally minor and typical of these antihypertensive agents. Drug-related adverse events were greater in the nisoldipine CC- than the HCTZ-treated patients (50% and 37%, respectively). Nisoldipine CC was shown to demonstrate antihypertensive efficacy similar to HCTZ in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.     

Comparative antihypertensive effectiveness of once-daily mibefradil and diltiazem CD. Mibefradil Hypertension Study Group

This multicenter, double-masked, randomized, forced-titration, parallel-group trial was designed to determine whether we could confirm the results of a previous trial that demonstrated a significantly greater antihypertensive effect for mibefradil compared with diltiazem CD. Two hundred thirty-nine patients with uncomplicated mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and a baseline sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) between 95 and 114 mm Hg were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with mibefradil 50 mg (n = 119) or diltiazem CD 180 mg (n = 120). After 4 weeks of treatment, all patients underwent forced titration to mibefradil 100 mg or diltiazem CD 360 mg for an additional 8 weeks. After 12 weeks of active treatment, the mean reduction from baseline in trough SDBP was significantly greater with mibefradil than with diltiazem CD (-14.3 +/- 6.6 mm Hg vs -11.7 +/- 7.4 mm Hg, respectively). In addition, significantly more patients receiving mibefradil had a decrease in SDBP > or = 10 mm Hg or a decrease to < or = 90 mm Hg by week 12 than did patients receiving diltiazem CD (82% vs 72%, respectively). The tolerability of mibefradil and diltiazem CD were comparable, with similar percentages of patients in both groups reporting at least one adverse event (21% vs 22%, respectively) that was considered to be at least remotely related to the study drug. The results of this study confirm those of the previous trial. Once-daily treatment with mibefradil 100 mg is significantly more effective than diltiazem CD 360 mg in lowering both diastolic and systolic blood pressure. Both drugs are well tolerated.     

The possible damages from cosmetic abuse

Hypertension is a major complication in kidney transplantation and contributes to the high cardiovascular mortality of renal transplanted recipients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of phlebotomy on blood pressure in posttransplant hypertension associated with erythrocytosis. In 12 renal transplanted patients (7 male, 5 female, aged 29-52 years) with erythrocytosis (defined by hematocrit > 52% or hemoglobin > 170 g/l), a 24-hour-monitoring of blood-pressure and heart rate (SpaceLabs SL90207) was performed before, 2 and 6 weeks after phlebotomy. Patients with iron-deficiency and/or transplant rejection were excluded from the study. Ten of 12 patients were on antihypertensive treatment before phlebotomy. Phlebotomy (500 ml) was repeated three times on average within the first two weeks, until hematocrit decreased below 45%. The phlebotomy therapy lowered the hematocrit after two weeks from 54.8 +/- 2.8% to 44.3 +/- 4.2% and 43.0 +/- 5.6% after six weeks. Before phlebotomy, the blood pressure was systolic 153.2 +/- 15.1 mmHg and diastolic 95.2 +/- 9.5 mmHg. After repeated phlebotomy, there was a significant decrease of blood pressure to systolic 139.0 +/- 14.1 and diastolic 85.3 +/- 8.2 mmHg (p < 0.01). Without change of hematocrit and hemoglobin, there was no further change of blood pressure after six weeks (systolic 140.1 +/- 9.9 mmHg, diastolic 86.3 +/- 9.5 mmHg). The heart rate did not change significantly during the therapy. The antihypertensive treatment could be reduced in most of the patients. The present study demonstrates the therapeutic effect of phlebotomy in posttransplant hypertension associated with erythrocytosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of oral pyridoxine hydrochloride supplementation on arterial blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension

The purpose of this study was to test the effect of vitamin B6 (pyridoxine-HCl, CAS 58-56-0) supplementation on arterial blood pressure in essential hypertension. The trial comprised 9 normotensive subjects (7 men and 2 women, aged between 32-58 years; mean +/- SD, 48 +/- 11) and 20 patients with essential hypertension (16 men and 4 women, aged between 32-69 years; mean +/- SD, 56 +/- 12). The patients were treated during 4 weeks with a single oral dose of pyridoxine (5 mg/kg body weight/day). After a 5-min rest, measurements were made in the supine position. When compared with the normotensive subjects, the hypertensive subject group had a significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) and higher level of plasma norepinephrine (NE) (p < 0.01) before pyridoxine treatment. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in plasma epinephrine (E) and heart rates. Treatment of hypertensive patients with pyridoxine significantly reduced systolic (p < 0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.005), plasma NE (p < 0.005) and E (p < 0.05) within 4 weeks. However, there was no significant difference in heart rate at the end of pyridoxine treatment. These results indicate a relationship between pyridoxine status and arterial blood pressure in the essential hypertensive patients.     

Segmental glomerulopathy of early rejection

This prospective study was designed to investigate the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on systolic and diastolic functions. Twenty-eight non-smoking, healthy postmenopausal women who had not received any kind of HRT for at least three years within the onset of menopause were included in the study. All patients received 0.625 mg conjugated oestrogens and 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate as daily HRT regimen. Their basic systolic and diastolic functions were investigated echocardiographically using standard positions and windows before and 6 months after initiation of HRT. The means of age, weight and length of postmenopausal period were 49.3 +/- 5.8 years, 63.5 +/- 8.7 kg and 46.3 +/- 7.1 months, respectively. Heart rate and systolic and diastolic pressures were similar during the pre- and post-treatment periods. After 6 months of HRT, the mean left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes were decreased significantly (71.3 +/- 16.4 versus 56.3 +/- 22.8 ml, 144.5 +/- 26.1 versus 111.7 +/- 24.0 ml, respectively, P < 0.05). Left ventricular ejection fraction was increased (45.1 +/- 6.2% versus 54.8 +/- 4.1%, P < 0.05). Improvement in diastolic function was significant compared with the pretreatment period (E/A 0.90 +/- 0.2 versus 1.10 +/- 0.4, deceleration time 238 +/- 36.8 versus 201 +/- 24.2 ms, respectively, P < 0.05). Based on our preliminary results, we conclude that besides the known favourable effects on women's lives, HRT may also improve cardiac performance and age-related dysfunctions. The present results further suggest that oestrogens exert many direct effects on the cardiovascular system, other than the metabolic changes related to lipoproteins.     

Repair of coarctation of the aorta in adults: the fate of systolic hypertension

BACKGROUND: The benefit of coarctation repair in adults has been questioned by suggesting that hypertension may not be relieved by the operation and that surgical intervention may have no impact on the natural history of the disease. METHODS: To delineate the impact of surgical intervention on systolic hypertension, we conducted a retrospective review of 26 adults with a mean age of 32 +/- 10 years who underwent coarctation repair between 1987 and 1993. All patients were hypertensive (mean systolic blood pressure, 174 +/- 21 mm Hg; range, 140 to 220 mm Hg), and 18 patients (69%) were on a regimen of at least one hypertensive medication at the time of surgical admission. All patients underwent catheterization, and the mean peak systolic gradient across the coarctation was 61 +/- 25 mm Hg (range, 25 to 120 mm Hg). Operation included resection and end-to-end anastomosis (3 patients), resection with an interposition tube graft (6 patients), a bypass graft (11 patients), and patch angioplasty (6 patients). There was no hospital mortality or late morbidity. RESULTS: Intermediate follow-up was available at a mean of 2.3 +/- 2 years (range, 1 to 7 years). At last follow-up, the peak systolic gradient between the upper and lower body was trivial (< or = 10 mm Hg) in 23 patients (88%) and mild (11 to 20 mm Hg) in 3 (12%). All patients had significant improvement in systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) compared to preoperative values, and the majority (23, 88%) were normotensive. More than half of the patients (14, 54%) were still on a regimen of antihypertensive medication at last follow-up, with a trend (p = 0.06) toward older patients requiring medication. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of coarctation in adults is an effective, low-risk procedure, which results in a significant improvement in systolic hypertension and a decreased requirement of antihypertensive medications.     

Hydrochlorothiazide is superior to isradipine for reduction of left ventricular mass: results of a multicenter trial. The Isradipine Study Group

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the efficacy of isradipine in reducing left ventricular (LV) mass and wall thickness in hypertensive patients. BACKGROUND: LV hypertrophy on the echocardiogram is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events. Reduction of LV mass may be a desirable goal of drug therapy for hypertension. However, although thiazide diuretic drugs have been advocated as first-line therapy for hypertension, their efficacy in reducing LV mass has been questioned. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate diastolic hypertension and LV mass in excess of 1 SD of normal values were randomized to isradipine (n = 89) or hydrochlorothiazide therapy (n = 45). Evaluations were obtained at baseline, after 3 and 6 months of treatment and 2 weeks after treatment was stopped. RESULTS: At 6 months, LV mass decreased by 43 +/- 45 g (mean +/- SD) with hydrochlorothiazide (p < 0.001) but only by 11 +/- 48 g with isradipine (p = NS; between-group comparison, p < 0.001). Two weeks after drug therapy was stopped, LV mass remained 24 +/- 41 g lower than that at baseline in the hydrochlorothiazide group (p = 0.003) but only 7 +/- 50 g lower in the isradipine group (p = NS). Septal and posterior wall thicknesses were significantly and equally reduced with both isradipine and hydrochlorothiazide. Greater LV mass reduction with hydrochlorothiazide was related to a 2.8 +/- 3.3-mm reduction of LV cavity size with hydrochlorothiazide but no reduction with isradipine. At 6 months of treatment, diastolic blood pressure (BP) by design was equally reduced in both treatment groups. At 3 months, systolic BP was reduced by 17 +/- 15 mm Hg with isradipine and by 26 +/- 15 and 25 +/- 17 mm Hg at 3 and 6 months, respectively, with hydrochlorothiazide (p = 0.003, between-group comparison). However, on stepwise multivariable regression analysis, treatment selection (partial r2 = 0.082, p = 0.001), change in average 24-h systolic BP (partial r2 = 0.032, p = 0.029) and change in average sitting systolic BP (partial r2 = 0.017, p = 0.096) were predictive of LV mass reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an equivalent reduction of diastolic BP, 6 months of therapy with hydrochlorothiazide is associated with a substantial reduction of LV mass, greater than that with isradipine. The superior efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide for LV mass reduction is associated with a greater reduction of systolic BP as well as drug selection itself. These data may have important therapeutic implications.     

Molecular analysis of the histone gene cluster of Psammechinus miliaris: III. Polarity and asymmetry of the histone-coding sequences

The Ca2+ antagonistic coronary vasodilator, Nifedipine, was sublingually administered by a dose of 30 mg to 19 patients with hypertension. Blood pressure of patients with with essential hypertension (n=14) decreased from 177 +/- 24 to 123 +/- 13 mmHg systolic and from 108 +/- 12 to 80 +/- 11 mmHg diastolic (mean +/- SD) (p less than 0.01). Plasma renin activity (PRA) increased significantly from 0.73 +/- 0.62 to 1.50 +/- 1.02 ng/ml/h (p less than 0.05). The same tendency was observed in malignant and renovascular hypertension. In primary aldosteronism (n = 2), blood pressure decreased but PRA did not increase. Hypotensive action and increased plasma renin activity by Ca2+ antagonist, Nifedipine, were clearly demonstrated in patients with hypertension.     

Bovine endometrial retinol-binding protein secretion, messenger ribonucleic acid expression, and cellular localization during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety and efficacy of stent placement in patients with poorly controlled hypertension and renal artery stenoses, which are difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty alone. BACKGROUND: Preliminary experience with stent placement suggests improved results over balloon angioplasty alone in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. METHODS: Balloon-expandable stents were placed in 100 consecutive patients (133 renal arteries) with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. Sixty-seven of the patients had unilateral renal artery stenosis treated and 33 had bilateral renal artery stenoses treated with stents placed in both renal arteries. RESULTS: Angiographic success, as determined by quantitative angiography, was obtained in 132 (99%) of 133 lesions. Early clinical success was achieved in 76% of the patients. Six months after stent placement, the systolic blood pressure was reduced from 173 +/- 25 to 147 +/- 23 mm Hg (p < 0.001); the diastolic pressure from 88 +/- 17 to 76 +/- 12 mm Hg (p < 0.001); and the mean number of antihypertensive medications per patient from 2.6 +/- 1 to 2.0 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001). Angiographic follow-up at a mean of 8.7 +/- 5.0 months in 67 patients revealed restenosis (>50% diameter narrowing) in 15 (19%) of 80 stented vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery stenting is an effective treatment for renovascular hypertension, with a low angiographic restenosis rate. Stent placement appears to be a very attractive therapy in patients with lesions difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty such as renal aorto-ostial lesions and restenotic lesions, as well as after a suboptimal balloon angioplasty result.     

Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats prefer chocolate and sucrose over ethanol

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of sequential external counterpulsation (SECP) on cerebral and renal blood flow. The effect of SECP on carotid and renal artery blood flow was studied in 35 and 18 patients, respectively. With a portable unit, cuffs were applied to the calves and thighs, sequentially inflated with air at the onset of diastole, and deflated at the onset of systole. Carotid and renal artery Duplex studies were performed during intermittent SECP. Flow velocity and flow velocity integral were measured at baseline and during SECP. Diastolic augmentation of carotid and renal artery flow velocity was observed in all patients. The mean carotid flow velocity integral increased by 22% from 27.7 +/- 1.8 cm to 33.1 +/- 2.3 cm (P = 0.001). The mean renal artery flow velocity integral increased by 19% from 21 +/- 1 cm to 25 +/- 1 cm (P = 0.0001). With SECP, a new diastolic Doppler flow velocity wave was observed, with an average peak carotid diastolic flow velocity of 56 +/- 4 cm/sec and an average peak renal artery diastolic flow velocity of 40 +/- 2.5 cm/sec. This diastolic wave was 75% (carotid) and 68% (renal) as high as the systolic wave during SECP. In addition, with SECP the systolic wave increased by 6% and 8% in the carotid and renal artery, respectively (P = 0.02 and 0.006, respectively). In conclusion, SECP significantly increases carotid and renal blood flow. This noninvasive, harmless treatment may be useful to support patients with decreased cerebral and renal perfusion.