Fluid balance, dry weight, and blood pressure in dialysis

The total amount of sodium present in the body controls the extracellular volume. In advanced renal failure, sodium balance becomes positive and the extracellular volume expands. This leads to hypertension, and vascular changes that lead to adverse cardiovascular consequences in dialysis patients. Controlling the body sodium content and the extracellular volume allows one to better control hypertension and its consequences. This can be achieved by reducing the sodium input (sodium dietary restriction and reasonably low sodium dialysate) and/or by increasing the sodium output (ultrafiltration by convection). The discontinuous nature of hemodialysis causes saw-tooth volume fluctuations. This has led to the concept of dry weight (DW), a crucial component of dialysis adequacy. Assessment and achievement of DW is feasible on pure clinical grounds. But its relative lack of accuracy (and the physicians' progressive lack of interest in bedside examination) has led to several nonclinical methods of assessing DW in an effort to improve the assessment of fluid status in dialysis patients.     

Intensive dialysis and blood pressure control: A review

The prevalence of hypertension in hemodialysis (HD) patients has increased over the years. In the early days of maintenance HD blood pressure (BP) control was achieved in most patients. As sessions were shortened, the prevalence of hypertension increased. Yet, in principle, dialysis is able to control hypertension. Today, in programs using long HD, most patients are normotensive without antihypertensive medication. The same is true for patients on daily dialysis, but not for those on short thrice‐weekly HD. In all studies reporting BP normalization, dry weight is regularly achieved. Why the poor control of hypertension now? At first sight the shortened session duration is the culprit. This is suggested by several epidemiologic observations and strongly supported by a prospective experience of changing the HD schedule (short to long HD or conversely) in the same group of patients. Recent studies, however, using strict volume control show that BP normalization can be obtained in conventional 3 x 4 hr/week dialysis with relatively low delivered Kt/V_urea. Therefore, prolonging the dialysis time and/or increasing the dialysis dose are not required to achieve BP control. Intensive dialysis most probably normalizes BP by getting the extracellular volume and the amount of sodium in the body back to normal. It acts in conjunction with a moderate dietary sodium restriction and the use of reasonably low dialysate sodium. With this approach improved BP control can be achieved in the vast majority of HD patients.     

Automatic feedback control of relative blood volume changes during hemodialysis improves blood pressure stability during and after dialysis

Automatic feedback systems have been designed to control relative blood volume changes during hemodialysis (HD) as hypovolemia plays a major role in the development of dialysis hypotension. Of these systems, one is based on the concept of blood volume tracking (BVT). BVT has been shown to improve intra-HD hemodynamic stability. We first questioned whether BVT also improves post-HD blood pressure stability in hypotension-prone patients and second, whether BVT is effective in reducing the post-HD weight as many hypotension-prone patients are overhydrated because of an inability to reach dry weight. After a 3-week period on standard HD, 12 hypotension-prone patients were treated with two consecutive BVT treatment protocols. During the first BVT period of 3 weeks, the post-HD target weight was kept identical compared with the standard HD period (BVT-constant weight; BVT-cw). During the second BVT period of 6 weeks, we gradually tried to lower the post-HD target weight (BVT-reduced weight; BVT-rw). In the last week of each period, we studied intra-HD and 24 hr post-HD blood pressure behavior by ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM). Pre- and post-HD weight did not differ between standard HD and either BVT-cw or BVT-rw. Heart size on a standing pre-dialysis chest X-ray did not change significantly throughout the study. There were less episodes of dialysis hypotension during BVT compared with standard HD (both BVT periods: p<0.01). ABPM data were complete in 10 patients. During the first 16 hr post-HD, systolic blood pressure was significantly higher with BVT in comparison with standard HD (both BVT periods: p<0.05). The use of BVT in hypotension-prone patients is associated with higher systolic blood pressures for as long as 16 hr post-HD. BVT was not effective in reducing the post-HD target weight in this patient group.     

Measures of blood pressure and cognition in dialysis patients

There are few reports on the relationship of blood pressure with cognitive function in maintenance dialysis patients. The Cognition and Dialysis Study is an ongoing investigation of cognitive function and its risk factors in six Boston area hemodialysis units. In this analysis, we evaluated the relationship between different domains of cognitive function with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and intradialytic changes in systolic blood pressure, using univariate and multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and primary cause of end‐stage renal disease. Among 314 participants, mean age was 63 years; 47% were female, 22% were African American, and 48% had diabetes. The mean (SD) of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and intradialytic change in systolic blood pressure were 141 (21), 73 (12), 68 (15), and ?10 (24) mmHg, respectively. In univariate analyses, the performance on cognitive tests primarily assessing executive function and processing speeds was worse among participants with lower diastolic blood pressure and higher pulse pressure. These relationships were not statistically significant, however, in multivariable analyses. There was no association between cognitive function and systolic blood pressure or intradialytic change in systolic blood pressure in either univariate or multivariable analyses. We found no association between different measures of blood pressure and cognitive function in cross‐sectional analysis. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these results.     

Effect of the decrease in dialysate sodium in pediatric patients on chronic hemodialysis

Optimal dialysate sodium (dNa) is unknown, with both higher and lower values suggested in adult studies to improve outcomes. Similar studies in pediatric hemodialysis (HD) population are missing. This is the first report of the effect of two constant dNa concentrations in pediatric patients on chronic HD. 480 standard HD sessions and interdialytic periods were studied in 5 patients (age 4–17 years, weight 20.8–66 kg) during a period of 6–11 months per patient. dNa was 140 mEq/L during the first half, and 138 mEq/L during the second half of the study period for each patient. Lowering dNa was associated with improved preHD hypertension, decreased interdialytic weight gain, decreased need for ultrafiltration, lower sodium gradient and was well tolerated despite lack of concordance with predialysis sNa, that was variable. Further studies are needed to verify our findings and to investigate if an even lower dNa may be more beneficial in the pediatric HD population.     

Effectiveness of sodium and conductivity kinetic models in predicting end-dialysis plasma water sodium concentration: preliminary results of a single-center experience

The attainment of a neutral sodium balance represents a major objective in hemodialysis patients. It requires that at the end of each dialysis session, total body water volume (V(f)) and total plasma water sodium concentration (Na(pwf)) are constant. Whereas to achieve a constant V(f) it is sufficient that ultrafiltration equals the interdialytic increase in body weight, it is impossible to predict the value of Na(pwf) and calculate the dialysate sodium concentration needed to obtain it without making use of kinetic mathematical models. The effectiveness of both sodium and conductivity kinetic models in predicting Na(pwf) has already been validated in previous clinical studies. However, applying the sodium kinetic model appears to be poorly feasible in the everyday clinical practice, due to the need for blood samples at the start of each dialysis session for the determination of predialysis plasma water sodium concentration. The conductivity kinetic model appears to be more easily applicable, because no blood samples or laboratory tests are needed to determine plasma water conductivity (C(pw)) and ionic dialysance (ID), used in place of plasma water sodium concentration and sodium dialysance, respectively. We applied the 2 models in 69 chronic hemodialysis patients using the Diascan Module for the automatic determination of C(pw) and ID, and using the latter as an estimate of sodium dialysance in the sodium kinetic model. The conductivity kinetic model was shown to be more accurate and precise in predicting Na(pwf) as compared with the sodium kinetic model. Both accuracy and imprecision of the 2 models were not significantly affected by the method used to estimate total body water volume. These findings confirm the conductivity kinetic model as being an effective and easily applicable instrument for the achievement of a neutral sodium balance in chronic hemodialysis patients.     

Extracellular Volume Changes and Blood Pressure Levels in Hemodialysis Patients

Background: Despite the use of highly efficient antihypertensive drugs (AHD), blood pressure (BP) is poorly controlled in the vast majority of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Many of them show no reduction in nocturnal BP, a finding that is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the removal of a fluid overload on BP by monitoring the ambulatory BP during 48 hours in 16 hypertensive HD patients treated with AHD. Our aim was to obtain a gradual reduction in post‐HD body weight (BW) over a period of 3 to 4 months. Methods: During a period of 3–4 months, the postdialysis BW was reduced as the minimal tolerable BW was gradually achieved by slightly increasing the ultrafiltration volume. The Na concentration in the dialysate was reduced from 143–141 mmol/L to 139–138 mmol/L. Extracellular volume (ECV) was measured with a multiple‐frequency bioimpedance analyzer (Xitron 4000B, Xitron Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Based on the change in ECV, the patients were subdivided into two groups: group 1 with a reduction in ECV (n = 10), and group 2 with no reduction (n = 6). At the start of the study, BW, BP, and AHD in group 1 and group 2 were virtually identical. Results: Group 1 showed a significant reduction during the entire 48‐hour period in systolic (156 ± 16 mmHg vs. 140 ± 14 mmHg, P = 0.030) and diastolic BP (97 ± 12 mmHg vs. 87 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.026) as well as in mean arterial pressure (MAP, 117 ± 13 vs. 105 ± 10 mmHg, P = 0.027). This reduction was more marked during the night (systolic BP 156 ± 15 mmHg vs. 138 ± 14 mmHg, P = 0.007; diastolic BP 97 ± 12 mmHg vs. 85 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.009) than during the day (157 ± 18 mmHg vs. 142 ± 15 mmHg, P = 0.067; diastolic BP 97 ± 13 mmHg vs. 90 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.126). A significant reduction in systolic load also occurred during the entire 48‐hour period (76 ± 24% vs. 46 ± 28%, P = 0.043) as well as in night systolic load (75 ± 21% vs. 41 ± 30%, P = 0.015) and night diastolic load (67 ± 32% vs. 39 ± 31%, P = 0.030). AHD were stopped in eight and reduced in two patients. There were no significant reductions in BP and AHD in group 2. Conclusions: The removal of excess fluid is necessary for adequate BP control and especially for the reduction in elevated BP during the night.     

Interdialytic blood pressure obtained by ambulatory blood pressure measurement and left ventricular structure in hypertensive hemodialysis patients

Unlike in subjects with normal renal function, the relationship between hypertension and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients is still being debated. In order to clarify this issue, we performed 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) during the interdialytic period in a group of 164 hypertensive patients, the blood pressure (BP) control based on conventional antihypertensive strategy previously, on chronic hemodialysis treatment in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. These results were then compared with their echocardiographic data. This is a cross-sectional analysis. The mean ABPM during 44 hours was close to the manually measured predialysis value, but there was a gradual increase in the ABPM values in the interdialytic period. When divided into a group with mild or no left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (45 patients) and severe LVH (119 patients), the latter had significantly higher BP levels in all separate periods, while the difference in predialysis BP was not significant. Patients with severe LVH had larger left atrium and left ventricular diameters, and consumed more antihypertensive drugs. Systolic BP during the night before dialysis showed the strongest relation to LVH, but interdialytic weight gain was also independently related to LVH. Yet, 56% of the patients with systolic BP <135 had severe LVH. There is not only an association between BP and presence of LVH, but it is shown that volume expansion is also an important independent determinant of LVH. This may explain the difficulty in identifying hypertension as a cardiac risk factor in these patients.     

Clinical Determination of Dry Body Weight

While nephrologists wait for the ideal, non invasive, inexpensive, precise, and reproducible tool to evaluate extracellular volume (ECV), they need to exert their clinical acumen in the quest of that holy grail, dry weight (DW). Estimation of DW using a clinical approach based on blood pressure (BP) and ECV is feasible and reliable as shown by successful experiences in various dialysis modes over more than three decades. But a need still exists to resolve difficulties associated with accurate assessment of BP (methods and circumstances of measurement, and the confounding effects of antihypertensive drugs) and ECV (evaluation of weight changes unrelated to ECV, lack of specificity and sensitivity of clinical symptoms, lag time, confusion in terminology). An essential point in clinical assessment of DW is that a normal BP is at the same time the target and the crucial index of DW achievement. For this reason, a trialand‐error “probe” process has to be used at intervals to make sure that the dry weight target point is correctly estimated. The various “non clinical” methods proposed for dry weight assessment increase the complexity and the cost of hemodialysis. They are, in the present state of things, more clinical research than practice tools. They do not replace clinical judgment.     

A study of the extracorporeal rate of blood flow and blood pressure during hemodialysis

Hemodynamic instability is a common problem during hemodialysis (HD). The effect of blood flow rate (BFR) on blood pressure (BP) during HD has not been previously evaluated. Subjects receiving HD for the treatment of renal failure were enrolled (n=34). For each patient, during the last hour of 2 consecutive HD sessions the BFR was set at 200 mL/min for 30 min and at 400 mL/min for 30 min, during which period the fluid removal rate was kept constant. The order of the BFR alterations was randomized. The study procedure was repeated during the next HD session but with reversal of the order of the altered BFR. During each 30-min period, BP was recorded at baseline and subsequently every 10 min. During the BFR of 400 mL/min, subjects had a higher systolic BP by an average of 4.1 mmHg compared with the BFR of 200 mL/min (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-7.98; p=0.038). Similarly, during the BFR of 400 mL/min, subjects had a higher diastolic BP by an average of 3.04 mmHg compared with the BFR of 200 mL/min (95% CI 0.55-5.53; p=0.017). Likewise, during the BFR of 400 mL/min, subjects had a higher mean arterial pressure by an average of 3.44 mmHg (95% CI 0.77-6.11; p=0.012). The findings suggest that during HD, BPs are maintained higher at higher BFRs as compared with lower BFRs.