Long-term effects of tear film component deposition on the surface and optical properties of two different orthokeratology lenses

PurposeTo understand the effects of long-term deposition of tear film components on the surface and optical properties of orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses, two different lenses, Brighten 22 and Optimum Extra, were tested here.MethodsOrtho-k lenses were immersed in artificial tears and cleaned with a commercial care solution repeatedly for up to 90 days. Both the daily and accumulated lysozyme deposition amounts using an Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay were then analyzed. The base curve, central thickness, power, and transmission of visible light, ultraviolet A, and ultraviolet B were analyzed before and after repeated tear film component deposition procedures. The surface roughness using atomic force microscopy was observed and an energy dispersive spectrometer was used to analyze the composition of the deposits.ResultsThe highest levels of lysozyme were adsorbed on both lens materials during the first four days of the procedure and became saturated by day 6. For both lens materials, contamination on the lenses was easily observed by day 30, and the degree of surface roughness was higher. The transmission levels of different light spectrums were reduced showing that the optical characteristics of both lenses were also affected.ConclusionsThe results provide in vitro evidence that lysozyme could not be completely removed from orthokeratology lenses. Both surface and optical properties were affected by the deposition of tear film components. However, only one commercial multipurpose care solution was used to clean the lens in this study when the main ingredient was a surfactant, and the results might be different when other care regimens with other key ingredients are used. In addition, whether tear film component deposition might result in increased risks of infection or corneal abrasion will require further investigation.     

Protein deposition on contact lenses: The past, the present, and the future

Proteins are a key component in body fluids and adhere to most biomaterials within seconds of their exposure. The tear film consists of more than 400 different proteins, ranging in size from 10 to 2360 kDa, with a net charge of pH 1-11. Protein deposition rates on poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (pHEMA) and silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses have been determined using a number of ex vivo and in vitro experiments. Ionic, high water pHEMA-based lenses attract the highest amount of tear film protein (1300 μg/lens), due to an electrostatic attraction between the material and positively charged lysozyme. All other types of pHEMA-based lenses deposit typically less than 100 μg/lens. Silicone hydrogel lenses attract less protein than pHEMA-based materials, with <10 μg/lens for non-ionic and up to 34 μg/lens for ionic materials. Despite the low protein rates on silicone hydrogel lenses, the percentage of denatured protein is typically higher than that seen on pHEMA-based lenses. Newer approaches incorporating phosphorylcholine, polyethers or hyaluronic acid into potential contact lens materials result in reduced protein deposition rates compared to current lens materials.     

BCLA CLEAR - Contact lens wettability,cleaning, disinfection and interactions with tears

Contact lens materials have undergone significant changes over the past 20 years, particularly with respect to the introduction of silicone hydrogel materials. Whilst this development addressed hypoxic issues, other important areas relating to contact lens success, notably comfort, require further research.Contact lens wettability remains a crucially important part of biocompatibility. Contact lenses can be made more wettable by incorporation of surfactants into blister packs, internal wetting agents, surface treatments or care solutions. However, there remains no clear association between contact lens wettability and comfort, making it challenging to determine the potential for these approaches to be of significant clinical benefit. Most contact lenses are used on a daily wear, reusable basis, which requires them to be disinfected when not worn. The ideal disinfecting solution would also improve comfort during wear. However, balancing these requirements with other factors, including biocompatibility, remains a challenge. Soft lens materials invariably take up and subsequently release certain components of disinfecting solutions onto the ocular surface. This may affect tear film stability and the normal ocular microbiome, and further research is needed in this area to determine whether this has any affect on comfort. Finally, contact lens materials sorb components of the tear film, and these interactions are complex and may change the biochemistry of the tear film, which in turn may affect their comfort.In conclusion, the interaction between lens materials, tear film and disinfection solution plays an important role in the biocompatibility of lenses. However, the exact role and whether this can be altered to improve biocompatibility and comfort during wear remains debatable. This report summarises the best available evidence to examine this complex relationship and the opportunities for practitioners to enhance in-eye comfort of contemporary lenses, along with providing suggestions for areas of study that may provide further information on this topic.     

Acanthamoeba keratitis in patients wearing scleral contact lenses

Purpose

To report a series of cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) in scleral lens wearers with keratoconus to determine whether this type of contact lens presents a greater risk for development of infection. Methods: This study reports three patients who wore scleral contact lenses to correct keratoconus and developed AK. The diagnoses of AK were established based on cultures of the cornea, scleral contact lenses, and contact lens paraphernalia. This study investigated the risk factors for infections. Results: The possible risks for AK in scleral contact lens wearers are hypoxic changes in the corneal epithelium because of the large diameter and minimal tear exchange, use of large amounts of saline solution necessary for scleral lens fitting, storing the scleral lens overnight in saline solution rather than contact lens multipurpose solutions, not rubbing the contact lens during cleaning, and the space between the cornea and the back surface of the scleral lens that might serve as a fluid reservoir and environment for Acanthamoeba multiplication. Two patients responded well to medical treatment of AK; one is still being treated. Conclusions: The recommendations for use and care of scleral contact lenses should be emphasized, especially regarding use of sterile saline (preferably single use), attention to rubbing the lens during cleaning, cleaning of the plunger, and overnight storage in fresh contact lens multipurpose solutions without topping off the lens solution in the case.     

Thirty years of ‘quiet eye’ with etafilcon A contact lenses

Frequent replacement contact lenses made from the etafilcon A hydrogel lens material were introduced onto the market over 30 years ago, and etafilcon A remains the most widely used hydrogel lens material today. Although the prescribing of silicone hydrogel lenses is increasing, millions of lens wearers globally have been wearing hydrogel lenses for many years and exhibit a physiologically-stable ‘quiet eye’, with a low profile of adverse events. Hydrogel lenses are demonstrated to maintain a low inflammatory response and infection risk profile during daily wear, which in the case of etafilcon A, may be related to its low modulus, and the naturally-protective, anti-microbial, non-denatured lysozyme absorbed into the lens from the tear fluid. Although improved corneal physiology from decreased hypoxia with silicone hydrogel lenses is well accepted, equivalent levels of corneal oxygenation are maintained during daily wear of low to medium powered hydrogel lenses, which do not impede the daily corneal de-swelling process, and do not induce clinically significant changes in ocular health. Therefore, hydrogel lenses remain an important alternative for daily wear in modern contact lens practice.     

Surface versus bulk activity of lysozyme deposited on hydrogel contact lens materials in vitro

Purpose

To determine and compare the levels of surface versus bulk active lysozyme deposited on several commercially available hydrogel contact lens materials.

BCLA CLEAR – Medical use of contact lenses

The medical use of contact lenses is a solution for many complex ocular conditions, including high refractive error, irregular astigmatism, primary and secondary corneal ectasia, disfiguring disease, and ocular surface disease. The development of highly oxygen permeable soft and rigid materials has extended the suitability of contact lenses for such applications. There is consistent evidence that bandage soft contact lenses, particularly silicone hydrogel lenses, improve epithelial healing and reduce pain in persistent epithelial defects, after trauma or surgery, and in corneal dystrophies. Drug delivery applications of contact lens hold promise for improving topical therapy. Modern scleral lens practice has achieved great success for both visual rehabilitation and therapeutic applications, including those requiring retention of a tear reservoir or protection from an adverse environment. This report offers a practical and relevant summary of the current evidence for the medical use of contact lenses for all eye care professionals including optometrists, ophthalmologists, opticians, and orthoptists. Topics covered include indications for use in both acute and chronic conditions, lens selection, patient selection, wear and care regimens, and recommended aftercare schedules. Prevention, presentation, and management of complications of medical use are reviewed.     

Randomized crossover trial of silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PurposeThe aim of the current study is to assess, using new technologies, the interaction of four monthly silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the ocular surface and the comfort over 15 days of use.MethodsProspective cross-over, randomized and double-masked study including four materials (lotrafilcon-B, samfilcon-A , comfilcon-A and filcom-V3). Clinical examination was performed in the following order: tear meniscus height, first break-up of the tear film, the average time of all tear film breakup incidents, bulbar redness, limbal redness (Keratograph 5M ,Oculus, Germany); central corneal thickness (Pentacam, Oculus, Germany), thermography values (FLIR A325; FLIR Systems Inc., USA), and slit-lamp evaluations, including ocular surface staining. Finally, subjective comfort was obtained from Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8.ResultsThe impact of contact lens wear on the ocular surface didn’t show statistically significant changes over time except for corneal and conjunctival staining grades on day 15 compared to day 1 for the comfilcon A group (P = .003 and P = .01, respectively). Contact lens stability and impact on the ocular surface during contact lens wear didn’t show statistically significant changes over time except in the case of the comfilcon A material with respect to the irritation item (P = .01).ConclusionsThese results suggest that the impact of monthly silicone hydrogel contact lens materials on the ocular surface after and during contact lens wear, contact lens stability over time, and subjective comfort did not reveal any significant changes over 15 days of use for any of the materials.     

The nature and consequence of vitronectin interaction in the non-compromised contact lens wearing eye

Purpose

The aim of this work was to investigate the locus and extent of vitronectin (Vn) deposition on ex vivo contact lenses and to determine the influence of wear modality together with surface and bulk characteristics of the lens material.

The effect of short term contact lens wear on the tear film and ocular surface characteristics of tolerant and intolerant wearers.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of contact lens wear on the tear film and ocular surface of people tolerant or intolerant to contact lens wear. Twenty subjects participated; 11 tolerants and nine intolerants. Their baseline tear film (no lens wear) was analysed with a range of clinical measurements and protein analyses (lactoferrin, sIgA and lysozyme). The tests were then repeated at the end of 6h of contact lens wear during the day and while lenses were worn. Both tolerants and intolerants showed statistically significant increases in bulbar and overall conjunctival redness after 6h of lens wear. For tolerants only, there was a statistically significant increase in the tear film meniscus area (0.08 mm(2) +/- 0.04 compared to 0.14 mm(2) +/- 0.06 (p = 0.023)) and a statistically significant decrease in the non-invasive tear film break-up time (NI-TBUT; 21.3 s +/- 5.7 compared to 3.7 s +/- 4.3 (p = 0.003)) after 6h of lens wear. There were no changes in other tear film or ocular surface parameters. The protein concentration and lipid layer appearance did not change during lens wear for either population. Prior to lens wear, tolerant subjects had a statistically longer NI-TBUT, higher phenol red thread test and higher tear flow rate. After 6h of lens wear and while wearing lenses, all but NI-TBUT remained statistically different. Lens wear affected only a small number of clinical variables and 6h wear did not effect the concentration of those proteins measured in tears in this study.     

Effects of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the protein composition of the tear film.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the influence of multipurpose contact lens cleaning solutions on tear proteins. Changes in tear film protein profiles of contact lens wearers who used several marketed brands of multipurpose contact lens care solutions, were assessed by ProteinChip analysis. METHODS: Three studies were conducted. Study I was a comparison of Complete and OptiFree multipurpose solutions. Study II was a study with Complete Moisture Plus solution, Study II was a comparison of Renu and Solocare contact lens solutions. Wearers of soft contact lenses were assigned to use the contact lens care solutions for 4 weeks. Non-contact lens wearing patients were used as controls. Tear samples of each participant were analyzed with the ProteinChip (SELDI-TOF) system. Multivariate statistical analysis and artificial neural networks were used to determine the tear protein profiles of each study group. RESULTS: Before starting the use of the solutions, the tear protein composition in all contact lens wearers deviated from the tear composition of the non-contact lens wearing controls. After 4 weeks of using the different care regimens, the tear protein composition of the patients using Complete or Complete Moisture Plus solutions tended to move toward that of the non-contact lens wearing controls. The tear protein composition of patients using the OptiFree, Renu or Solocare solutions did not undergo a measureable change in the protein level. CONCLUSIONS: The ProteinChip system can analyze protein profiles for large-scale applications as in clinical studies. Two multipurpose solutions, Complete and Complete Moisture Plus, demonstrated a beneficial effect on the tear proteins in contact lens wearers.     

Albumin adsorption to contact lens materials: A review

During contact lens wear, tear film components such as lipids, mucins and proteins tend to deposit on and within the lens material and may cause discomfort, reduced vision and inflammatory reactions. The tear film protein that has attracted most interest when studying contact lens deposition is the small (14 kDa), positively charged protein lysozyme. Albumin, which is a much larger protein (66 kDa) with an overall net negative charge is also of interest, and shows very different adsorption patterns to lysozyme. The concentration of albumin in the tear film is relatively low compared to the concentration in blood serum, but this value increases markedly under various conditions, including when the eye is closed, during contact lens wear and in various dry eye states. Gaining an understanding of the manner in which albumin deposits on biomaterials is of importance for contact lens wear, as well as for other medical applications where HEMA-based materials are used for implants, artificial blood vessels or drug delivery devices. This review paper summarizes the impact of individual material compositions, water content, hydrophobicity and electrostatic attraction on the adsorption behavior of the protein albumin.     

Therapeutic contact lenses and eyedrops--is there a problem?

Numerous authors have investigated the interactions of contact lenses with their care solutions. Many reported hypersensitivity and toxicity reactions induced by the preservative in the care solution, especially with soft contact lenses. In medical contact lens practice the concurrent use of eyedrops in a patient wearing therapeutic contact lenses is a contentious issue. The usual practice is to prescribe unpreserved drops. In reviewing the literature, we found no evidence of complications using preserved eyedrops with such contact lenses in situ. The reluctance to prescribe preserved topical medication could stem from the evidence relating to contact lens care solutions.     

Retention of conditioning agent hyaluronan on hydrogel contact lenses

Hyaluronan, a member of the glycosaminoglycan family of biological polysaccharides, is a high-molecular-weight disaccharide polymer found throughout the human body, particularly in the eye. Bausch + Lomb Biotrue? multi-purpose solution contains hyaluronan as a lens conditioning agent. The retention of hyaluronan from Biotrue multi-purpose solution to a variety of hydrogel contact lenses was evaluated over time. Fluorescein-tagged hyaluronan was allowed to adhere to lenses, which were then rinsed with balanced salt solution at a rate comparable to human tear secretion. Results demonstrated that hyaluronan was released slowly throughout the rinse period. The chemistry of the lens materials appeared to contribute to the hyaluronan retention capacity for each lens type. The results suggest that a multi-purpose solution containing hyaluronan has the potential to provide lens conditioning regardless of the hydrogel contact lens used.     

Optical considerations for scleral contact lenses: A review

Scleral contact lenses have a range of therapeutic and optical applications. In recent years, scleral lens prescribing has increased due to significant advances in ocular imaging technology, lens manufacturing processes, and the widespread availability of scleral lenses globally. While the optical principles of scleral lenses are identical to those of corneal rigid lenses (i.e. the post-lens tear layer neutralises the majority of anterior corneal astigmatism and higher order aberrations), the nature of scleral lenses and their typical fitting characteristics means that many of the assumptions of ‘thin lens’ paraxial optics traditionally used for corneal rigid lens calculations may be inappropriate in certain clinical scenarios. This review provides a comprehensive overview of a variety of lens and fitting characteristics that are unique to scleral lenses, or not typically encountered with corneal rigid lenses, and how these factors may potentially influence optical performance based on theoretical modelling, in particular; scleral lens parameters, the post-lens tear layer, and dynamic changes during lens wear. Current front and back surface lens designs and future scleral lens applications are also discussed, along with lens modifications to improve visual outcomes and transient changes in corneal optics induced by appropriately fitted modern scleral lenses.     

Non-invasive pre-lens tear film assessment with high-speed videokeratoscopy

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of two types of daily contact lenses (delefilcon A and omafilcon A) on the tear film and establish whether it is dependent on pre-corneal tear film characteristics using a new method to analyse high-speed videokeratoscopy recordings, as well as to determine the sensitivity of the method in differentiating between contact lens materials on eye.

Calculated tear oxygen tension under contact lenses offering resistance in series: piggyback and scleral lenses.

BACKGROUND: Models of oxygen delivery to the cornea with contact lens wear have considered the customary situation of one lens being worn on the cornea. However, two lenses, such as a rigid lens piggybacked on a soft lens, may be worn by patients with special ocular and visual needs. This paper extends existing single lens models to circumstances where two lenses offer resistance to oxygen in series. METHODS: Theoretical oxygen tensions are calculated for tear layers trapped beneath piggyback contact lens systems (and scleral lenses) and the anterior corneal surface with a simple single chamber corneal model using a personal computer software spreadsheet. RESULTS: Acceptable values are anticipated for contact lens materials of modern oxygen permeability values of approximately 60-100 Fatt Dk units under open eye conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this spreadsheet model of oxygen supply to the anterior corneal surface offer a useful guide to clinicians concerned about providing their patients with physiologically acceptable piggyback lens systems.     

Tear analysis and lens-tear interactions. Part I. Protein fingerprinting with microfluidic technology.

The purpose of this work is to establish the application of a fully automated microfluidic chip based protein separation assay in tear analysis. It is rapid, requires small sample volumes and is vastly superior to, and more convenient than, comparable conventional gel electrophoresis assays. The protein sizing chip technology was applied to three specific fields of analysis. Firstly tear samples were collected regularly from subjects establishing the baseline effects of tear stimulation, tear state and patient health. Secondly tear samples were taken from lens wearing eyes and thirdly the use of microfluidic technology was assessed as a means to investigate a novel area of tear analysis, which we have termed the 'tear envelope'. Utilising the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer in combination with the Protein 200 Plus LabChip kit, these studies investigated tear proteins in the range of 14-200 kDa. Particular attention was paid to the relative concentrations of lysozyme, tear lipocalin, secretory IgA (sIgA), IgG and lactoferrin, together with the overall tear electropherogram 'fingerprint'. Furthermore, whilst lens-tear interaction studies are generally thought of as an investigation into the effects of tears components on the contact lens material, i.e. deposition studies, this report addresses the reverse phenomenon--the effect of the lens, and particularly the newly inserted lens, on the tear fluid composition and dynamics. The use of microfluidic technology provides a significant advance in tear studies and should prove invaluable in tear diagnostics and contact lens performance analysis.     

Is contact lens "T" still important?

We studied oxygen supply to the contact lens covered cornea by means of a complex calculation method. We measured lens thicknesses, both centrally and at a 3mm peripheral location, of a range of optical powers of two different spherical silicone hydrogel contact lens designs (manufactured by Ciba Vision and Bausch & Lomb) and one "traditional" hydrogel. Using the measured values of lens thickness and the nominal oxygen permeabilities of these three plastics, we calculated the oxygen tension level in the tear layer posterior to the contact lens and anterior to the cornea and the oxygen flux through these contact lenses, under both open- and closed-eye conditions. We conclude that variable thicknesses of the silicone hydrogel contact lenses does not significantly affect the oxygen tension in the entrapped tear layer, given their high oxygen diffusion coefficients, under open-eye conditions, and probably only minimally under closed-eye conditions as well.     

Chromatic dispersion of soft contact lens materials

PurposeTo investigate and evaluate the chromatic dispersion of various hydrogel and silicon hydrogel contact lens materials.MethodsEighteen different soft contact lens materials with high and low water content in lens power of −1.00 DS were measured by one operator at temperature of 20 °C ± 0.5° soaked in ISO standard phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and in their respective packaging solutions (PS). An analogue Abbe refractometer (Model Zuzi 320, AUXILAB, S.L., Navarra, Spain) was used for refractive index (RI) measurements at 5 different wavelengths. All contact lenses were presented in a random and masked order to the operator. The Bland-Altman method with 95 % limits of agreement (LoA) and coefficient of repeatability (CoR) was used to characterise the repeatability of refractive index measurements. The Abbe numbers for each material were calculated by entering the measured and interpolated refractive indices into the Abbe number equation. One-way ANOVA analysis was used to test if there were significant differences between the 5 different wavelengths (470 nm–680 nm) within each material. An unpaired t-test was used to determine if there were differences in refractive index or dispersion between packaging solution and PBS results.ResultsNelfilcon A (Dailies Aqua Comfort Plus) soaked in PS showed the best repeatability of all 18 examined soft contact lenses across all wavelengths with an average refractive index of 1.3848 for all 6 contact lenses with a standard deviation of 0.00064. The 95 % limits of agreement were between 1.3835 and 1.3860. The mean coefficient of repeatability for nelfilcon A was 0.00125. For contact lenses soaked in ISO Standard PBS comfilcon A (Biofinity) had the best repeatability. The average refractive index of all 6 contact lenses was 1.4041 with a standard deviation of 0.00031 and a coefficient of repeatability of 0.00060. The 95 % limits of agreement were between 1.4035 and 1.4047. The analysis with One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons involving Holm-Sidak post-hoc, showed that there are significant differences (p < 0.001, F_ratio = 376.2 between wavelengths and F_ratio = 1559 between different refractive indices) in the refractive index of most common lens materials across the visible wavelength range. Based on unpaired t-test, there is no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the Abbe numbers of the tested lens materials whether they have been placed in the packaging solution or in standard PBS (p > 0.05, 95 % CI = −4.8070 to 5.8680, t = 0.2054). The Abbe numbers for the calculated contact lenses soaked in PS ranged between 43.7 and 89.9. For contact lenses stored in PBS the range was between 46.3 and 81.6.ConclusionThere is a good repeatability between repeated RI measurements taken from the same lens and from the same material. The significant differences between the refractive indices across the 5 different wavelengths showed the presence of chromatic dispersion in the 18 evaluated soft contact lens materials. Furthermore, it could be shown that there is no significant difference in dispersion whether the contact lenses are soaked in standard PBS or in their respective packaging solutions. With no other published data available as a reference, absolute accuracy of the calculated Abbe numbers remains to be confirmed, however, this study did confirm that significant chromatic dispersion exists in soft contact lens materials.