A measure of tear inflow in habitual scleral lens wearers with and without midday fogging

PurposeThe purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate tear inflow in a scleral lens system using fluorophotometry, and indirectly assess the exchange of the tear reservoir in habitual scleral lens wearers with the presence or absence of midday fogging (MDF).MethodsHabitual scleral lens wearers (n=23) and normal scleral lens neophytes (n=10) were recruited. Of the 23 habitual wearers, 11 of them experienced MDF and 12 did not have a diagnosis of MDF. Contact lens-fitting characteristics were evaluated using ocular coherence tomograpy (OCT) and biomicroscopy. High molecular weight fluorescein (FITC) Dextran was instilled into the tear reservoir beneath the scleral lens, and the tear fluid fluorescein concentration was measured using the Fluorotron fluorophotometer. Calculated fluorescein concentrations were plotted over time to measure the fluorescein decay rate of the tear fluid beneath the scleral lens, which was used to calculate the tear exchange rate.ResultsThere was no significant difference in tear inflow between the MDF group (mean: 0.111%) and the non-MDF group (mean: 0.417%), and there was a high amount of variability seen in the rates (p = 0.26). In addition, there was no significance between the tear reservoir thickness in the MDF (283um) and non-MDF (326um) groups (p = 0.53).ConclusionsThe relationship between the amount of tear exchange during scleral lens wear and the incidence of MDF was not significant. Additional studies are needed to further examine the role of tear exchange in MDF and address the causes of variability to improve measurement techniques with fluorophotometry in the scleral lens system.     

Assessment of a practitioner’s perception of scleral contact lens complications

PurposeThe purpose of this survey was to better understand scleral lens (SL) practitioners’ fitting preferences and minor SL complications and their subsequent treatments.MethodPractitioners who attended the 2017 Global Specialty Lens Symposium were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire that was created by the investigators, a survey that asked practitioners about their SL fitting experience and preferences, their patients’ experience with poor SL wetting, SL fogging, ocular symptoms (redness, pain/discomfort, dryness), and blurred central and side vision, and how the practitioners treated these conditions.ResultsThis study analyzed data from 164 SL practitioners. The practitioners had been in practice for 16.3 ± 13.4 years, had been fitting SL for 5.5 ± 5.0 years, and fit 7.4 ± 7.1 SL/month. Practitioners preferred a SL with a final central corneal clearance of ∼200 μm and an overall diameter between 15.1 mm to 16.5 mm. Poor SL wetting (90.8% of practitioners documented condition), SL fogging (84.8%), blurred central vision (40.2%), ocular redness (34.8%), ocular dryness (24.4%), ocular pain/discomfort (20.7%), and blurred side vision (12.8%) were encountered by the practitioners. Practitioners preferred treating poor wetting and fogging with lens removal, cleaning, and reapplication, blurred central vision with a lens power change, blurred side (peripheral) vision, ocular redness, and ocular pain with a lens parameter change, and dryness with artificial tears.ConclusionsMost SL practitioners preferred a SL central corneal clearance of ∼200 μm, and they occasionally encountered SL-related complications in their practice, which they treated similarly to corneal gas permeable CLs.     

Randomized crossover trial of silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PurposeThe aim of the current study is to assess, using new technologies, the interaction of four monthly silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the ocular surface and the comfort over 15 days of use.MethodsProspective cross-over, randomized and double-masked study including four materials (lotrafilcon-B, samfilcon-A , comfilcon-A and filcom-V3). Clinical examination was performed in the following order: tear meniscus height, first break-up of the tear film, the average time of all tear film breakup incidents, bulbar redness, limbal redness (Keratograph 5M ,Oculus, Germany); central corneal thickness (Pentacam, Oculus, Germany), thermography values (FLIR A325; FLIR Systems Inc., USA), and slit-lamp evaluations, including ocular surface staining. Finally, subjective comfort was obtained from Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8.ResultsThe impact of contact lens wear on the ocular surface didn’t show statistically significant changes over time except for corneal and conjunctival staining grades on day 15 compared to day 1 for the comfilcon A group (P = .003 and P = .01, respectively). Contact lens stability and impact on the ocular surface during contact lens wear didn’t show statistically significant changes over time except in the case of the comfilcon A material with respect to the irritation item (P = .01).ConclusionsThese results suggest that the impact of monthly silicone hydrogel contact lens materials on the ocular surface after and during contact lens wear, contact lens stability over time, and subjective comfort did not reveal any significant changes over 15 days of use for any of the materials.     

Soft contact lens wearers’ compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic

AimContact lens wearers need to maintain optimal hygiene practices during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise contact-lens complications including microbial keratitis and corneal infiltrative events. This online survey (UK and Ireland) explored contact lens wearers’ compliance behaviours, attitudes and concerns during the pandemic.MethodThe 60-item anonymous online survey was distributed during a 1-month period via Qualtrics (starting on 14/04/20). The survey captured: a) demographic information, b) type of lenses worn and compliance with lens wear and care procedures, c) adherence to recommendations and d) concerns associated with contact lens wear during the pandemic.ResultsTwo hundred and forty seven responses were received (34.3 ± 11.7 years old, 79% female). Seventy nine percent of participants reported that they were self-isolating or rigorously following social distance advice. Fifty-six percent of participants reported using their lenses less during the pandemic. Eighty-seven percent of respondents reported following the recommended 20-second rule most times/every time and 96% used soap and water during handwashing. Eleven percent of respondents admitted not following recommendations regarding disposal of lenses and 18% would not consider ceasing lens wear if unwell (with flu/cold) during the pandemic.ConclusionRespondents reported wearing their contact lenses less than usual. Good compliance with handwashing was observed but soft reusable lens wearers showed a statistically significant lower compliance with lens wear and care compared to daily disposable lens wearers (p=<0.001).     

Conjunctival prolapse during open eye scleral lens wear

PurposeTo investigate the incidence and peak elevation of conjunctival prolapse during short-term open eye scleral lens wear and its association with lens fitting characteristics.MethodsTen young, healthy adults (mean age ± SD, 30 ± 4 years) wore a high Dk sealed scleral lens for 90 min with an initial central post-lens fluid reservoir thickness defined as low (144 ± 23 μm), medium (487 ± 63 μm), and high (726 ± 55 μm). Optical coherence tomography was used to quantify limbal clearance, lens settling, and changes in conjunctival thickness.ResultsThe incidence of conjunctival prolapse was 37% across all fluid reservoir thickness conditions, with 80% of participants exhibiting conjunctival prolapse at least once. Prolapse was observed more frequently nasally (73%) than temporally (27%) (p < 0.01). The peak prolapse elevation did not vary with fluid reservoir thickness condition or anatomical location (both p > 0.05). For the low fluid reservoir thickness condition, eyes with conjunctival prolapse had greater initial limbal clearance (97 ± 38 μm compared to 43 ± 34 μm, p = 0.01) and more settling after 90 min of lens wear (−85 ± 30 μm compared to −34 ± 29 μm, p < 0.01). Greater limbal settling was associated with a higher peak elevation of the conjunctival prolapse (r = 0.48, p = 0.02), but not with landing zone tissue compression (r = 0.22, p = 0.33) or the initial or final limbal fluid reservoir thickness asymmetry (r ≤ 0.07, p > 0.05).ConclusionConjunctival prolapse was commonly observed during short-term sealed scleral lens wear in healthy eyes. The peak elevation of the conjunctival prolapse was associated with the extent of limbal settling, but not landing zone tissue compression or fluid reservoir thickness asymmetry.     

Scleral lens fitting and assessment strategies

PurposeTo describe prescriber reported scleral lens fitting and assessment strategies.MethodsThe SCOPE (Scleral Lenses in Current Ophthalmic Practice Evaluation) study group designed and administered an IRB approved, electronic survey (REDCap) regarding current scleral lens fitting and assessment methods. The survey was distributed to attendees of the 2017 Global Specialty Lens Symposium.Results95 practitioners responded to the survey. Over half of the respondents, 58% (55/95) reported fitting scleral lenses for less than five years (new prescribers), and 42% (40/95) reported fitting scleral lenses for more than five years (experienced prescribers). There was a statistically significant difference between their initial use of technology (χ² = 21.117, p < 0.0005) in selection of a diagnostic lens. New prescribers consider base curve first (60%, 33/55), while experienced prescribers considered sagittal depth first (63%, 25/40) in their initial scleral lens selection. All of the experienced lens prescribers (100%, 39/39) reported estimating central clearance by comparing thickness of the post-lens tear reservoir to scleral lens thickness using a slit lamp beam at least some of the time, and 62% of new scleral lens prescribers (34/55; χ² = 19.175, p < 0.0005) reported doing so. All (100%, 40/40) experienced prescribers schedule scleral lens follow-ups at a specific time and assess conjunctival compression (100%, 40/40), conjunctival staining (100%, 39/39), and corneal staining (100%,40/40) after lens removal.ConclusionsPractitioners with varying backgrounds and experience have added sclerals to their lens inventories. However, definite guidelines for fitting have not been developed. The results of a survey are provided; demonstrating that among practitioners with greater than 5 years of scleral lens experience, a consensus has emerged for best practices. Strategies for lens evaluation, which may inform future efforts at generating scleral fitting standards are described.     

A study of contact lens compliance in a non-clinical setting

PurposeTo evaluate soft contact lens replacement, overnight (ON) wear, and contact lens case compliance in a non-clinical sample.MethodsSubjects (n = 297) were recruited at the Center for Science and Industry (COSI) in Columbus, Ohio. Adult (≥ 18 years) soft contact lens wearers completed a survey about contact lens replacement, ON contact lens wear, and contact lens case replacement habits.ResultsTwo-week replacement lenses (according to the manufacturer’s replacement schedule [MRS]) were most common (45.5%), followed by monthly (34.3%) and daily replacement (20.2%). Non-compliance with replacement schedule was reported in 38.7% of subjects. Age (p = 0.02), years of lens wear (p = 0.02), and MRS (p <0.0001) affected replacement compliance. Post-hoc analysis showed daily replacement wearers were more compliant than two-week (p <0.0001) and monthly (p <0.0001) replacement wearers with prescribed lens replacement. Non-compliance with prescribed ON wear was reported in 23.9% of subjects. Subjects who were non-compliant with lens replacement were more likely to be non-compliant with ON wear (p = 0.02) and had worn contact lenses for less time (p = 0.02). Of the subjects who used contact lens cases, 74.6% were unsure when they should replace their case. Frequency of case replacement was not associated with age (p = 0.5), gender (p = 0.5), years of contact lens wear (p = 0.7), MRS (p = 0.4), replacement compliance (p = 0.3), or ON wear compliance (p = 0.7).ConclusionsDaily replacement wearers were most likely to be compliant with contact lens replacement, but all subjects, including daily replacement wearers, had similar ON wear non-compliance. Non-compliant lens replacement was associated with non-compliant ON wear, but contact lens case replacement was not related to either compliance category. The majority of subjects had no knowledge of proper contact lens case replacement, despite compliance in other categories.     

Intraocular pressure changes in neophyte scleral lens wearers: A prospective study

PurposeTo examine the variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first six months of scleral lens wear.MethodsThirty-two neophyte scleral lens wearers were recruited and IOP was measured using Goldman applanation tonometry before, and after 1 and 6 months of scleral lens wear (following lens removal). All scleral lenses were designed based on scleral topography or an impression of the ocular surface. Central corneal thickness and the central post-lens fluid reservoir thickness were quantified using optical coherence tomography.ResultsPost-lens removal IOP displayed an increasing trend after 1 and 6 months of lens wear, but the magnitude of change was not clinically or statistically significant using several repeated measures analyses to account for sporadic missing longitudinal data (mean increase of 1 mmHg or less, p > 0.05). Central corneal thickness and the central post-lens fluid reservoir remained stable throughout the first six months of lens wear.ConclusionIOP measured following lens removal did not vary significantly during the first 6 months of lens wear in scleral lens neophytes. Further research is required to determine if IOP varies during lens wear, following lens removal, or after longer-term lens wear due to suction forces or tissue compression beneath the landing zone.     

The treatment of ocular hypotony after trabeculectomy with a scleral lens: A case series

PurposeOcular hypotony after trabeculectomy may be treated medically, surgically and with a tamponade. Three cases are reported in which a scleral lens was applied to treat ocular hypotony after mitomycin C (MMC) augmented trabeculectomy.MethodsIn this retrospective case series the records of three eyes of three patients who developed ocular hypotony after they had undergone trabeculectomy augmented with MMC were evaluated. The patients were between 11 and 69 years of age and the intraocular pressure (IOP) after surgery ranged between 3 and 6 mmHg. All three patients showed a negative Seidel test; one had suspected hypotonic maculopathy and one had a collapsed anterior chamber. After unsuccessful treatment with large bandage lenses all three patients were subsequently fitted with a scleral lens. The scleral lens was fitted to fully cover and compress the bleb. Scleral lenses were worn continuously with a check-up after one night of wear and subsequent check-ups when needed. One patient continued to wear the scleral lens for a further 6.5 months on a daily wear basis.ResultsIn all three eyes the IOP was higher after wearing the scleral lens. Two patients stopped wearing the scleral lens after the IOP was stable. One patient developed a cataract; the cataract surgery was combined with a bleb revision and scleral lens wear was therefore discontinued.DiscussionThe scleral lens might be a useful tool in the treatment of ocular hypotony after trabeculectomy augmented MMC surgery. The effect of the scleral lens on the ocular pressure is unpredictable. Caution is advised in vulnerable corneas due to risk factors such as hypoxia and infection. Further research is warranted to establish the safety of the procedure, the patient selection and the overall success in a larger patient group.     

Scleral contact lenses in the pediatric population—Indications and outcomes

PurposeTo report the use of a custom-designed, scleral contact lens (SL) in the treatment of pediatric patients.MethodsThe medical records of all patients under 15 years of age fitted with SL from March 2018 through February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Ophthalmic diagnosis, prior surgical intervention, lens wearing failures, and duration of lens use are reported.ResultsLenses were dispensed to 18 patients (24 eyes). Main indications for SL fitting were refractive error correction (n = 18: keratoconus (KCN), traumatic corneal scarring, corneal transplant status, and aphakia) and ocular surface protection and optimization (n = 6: neurotrophic keratitis and chronic blepharokeratoconjunctivitis). Patient age ranged from 16 months to 14 years (mean, 9.9 ± 3.5 years (mean ± standard deviation (SD)). Patients fitted for surface disease indications were significantly younger, 8.8 ± 2.5 years. The mean maximal keratometry reading in patients with keratoconus was 64.0 ± 12.6 diopters (D). In six eyes with advanced KCN (Kmax 71.8 ± 11.0 D) and three eyes with traumatic scarring, SL use obviated the need for keratoplasty. Fifteen patients (83 %) continued scleral lens wear with a mean follow-up period of 9.2 ± 7.4 months. Complications included one case of corneal graft rejection and one corneal abrasion associated with lens insertion.ConclusionsThe goals of SL fitting in pediatric patients are visual rehabilitation and ocular surface protection. Pediatric patients with advanced keratoconus and traumatic corneal scarring are most appreciative of the benefits of scleral lenses. The challenges associated with SL fitting and the training process did not preclude long-term SL wear.     

The corneoscleral shape in keratoconus patients with and without specialty lens wear

PurposeTo evaluate differences in corneoscleral shape in keratoconus patients with and without specialty lenses compared to controls.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed comparing three groups of keratoconus eyes: 24 lens-naïve keratoconus eyes (17 patients; group 1), 7 eyes with corneal lens wear (7 patients; group 2) and 7 eyes with scleral lens wear (7 patients; group 3). For comparison, 25 eyes of 25 emmetropic participants and 11 eyes of 11 astigmatic participants were included. Corneoscleral topography measurements taken with the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP, Eaglet Eye BV, Houten, Netherlands) were exported and assessed using custom-made software to demarcate the limbal radius, and to calculate sagittal height and corneoscleral asymmetry.ResultsIn non-lens wearing keratoconus patients, sagittal height was found to be significantly larger than in control eyes, in both the corneal periphery and sclera (paired t-test, pairwise comparisons p < 0.01). The level of peripheral corneal and scleral asymmetry was also significantly higher in non-lens wearing keratoconus eyes compared to controls (t-test, p < 0.01). Both corneal and scleral lens wear resulted in significant changes to the shape of the corneal periphery and sclera. In all 3 groups of keratoconus eyes, asymmetry of the peripheral cornea showed a very strong correlation with scleral asymmetry (R² = 0.90, 0.86 and 0.85 for groups 1–3, respectively).ConclusionThe corneal periphery and sclera have a distinctly different shape in keratoconus eyes compared to controls. Specialty lens wear induces significant regional changes to the shape of the anterior eye in keratoconus eyes.     

A one-year prospective study on scleral lens wear success

PurposeTo report the success rate of scleral lens wear and the lens handling learning curve from the wearers perspective.MethodsNinety-five participants were consecutively screened for enrollment in a prospective study. Participants were divided into two groups: ICGroup (71 participants with irregular corneas) and RCGroup (24 participants with regular corneas). Participants attended several visits: Baseline, Lens Dispense Visit (LDV), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. The number and causes of scleral lens discontinuation and the time to correctly apply the lens for the first time at the LDV were evaluated. During follow-ups, participants answered a questionnaire regarding scleral lens wear (mean number of hours/day and days/week of lens wear, methods used for handling, number of attempts to correctly apply and remove the lenses).ResultsSixty-nine participants (73 %) successfully completed the 12-month period. Twenty-six participants (27 %) discontinued scleral lens wear. None of the discontinuations were due to adverse events. The success rate (number of participants that wore the lenses for the 12 months) was 77 % in ICGroup and 58 % in RCGroup. The main reasons for scleral lens discontinuation were handling issues (35 %) and discomfort (19 %). 36 % of participants required <15 min to correctly apply the lens at the LDV, however 13 % required >60 min (participants that wore spectacles, soft lenses or had no correction method at Baseline). The mean wearing time (hours/day and days/week) increased significantly from 1-month to 12-month appointments: from 9.8–11.1 h and 5.1–5.6 days in new scleral lens wearers, while the number of attempts to correctly apply and remove the lenses decreased significantly.ConclusionsThe success rate was 73 % during this prospective 12-month follow-up study. The main reasons for drop-out were handling issues and discomfort. Participants who continued scleral lens demonstrated increased handling skills.     

Effect of large diameter and plasma coating on the initial adaptation of gas permeable contact lens fitting for neophytes

PurposeTo determine whether the adaption of neophytes to rigid gas permeable lenses (GPs) could be accelerated by changing their diameter or surface lubricity.MethodsThis was a 2 part prospective double-masked randomised wear study. An GP lens (Roflufocon D material, 9.6 mm diameter) with and without a Hydrapeg plasma coating surface was worn by 119 neophytes (21.1 ± 3.5 years; 77% female) on separate occasions. A further 114 neophytes (average age 20.1 ± 1.0 years; 72% female) wore the uncoated lens with a 9.6 mm diameter lens in one randomly allocated eye and 10.1 mm (n = 51) or 10.6 mm (n = 63) in the other with a basecurve compensation keeping the fit equivalent. Lens fit and corneal staining was assessed after 20 min, and comfort and bulbar redness were assessed at the time of lens application and after 5, 10, 15, and 20 min. Participants also reported their ease of application and removal on a 5 point scale.ResultsPlasma coated GP lenses or increasing diameter did not improve comfort (p = 0.673, p > 0.05) or bulbar redness (p = 0.805, p > 0.05) during a 20 min adaptation period in neophytes. In both cohorts, comfort improved and bulbar redness reduced with time (p < 0.001). Corneal staining, ease of insertion application and ease of removal did not differ with GP coating application or GP diameter (p > 0.05).ConclusionChanging GP diameter or surface lubricity is not beneficial to the adaption of healthy neophytes     

Corneal surface wettability and tear film stability before and after scleral lens wear

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the anterior surface of scleral contact lens and ocular surface wettability before and after one-month of scleral lens wear in patients with keratoconus.MethodsForty-nine patients with keratoconus (36.26 ± 9.03 years) were recruited. The sample was divided into two groups: patients with intrastromal corneal ring (KCICRS group) and patients without ICRS (KC group). TFSQ, Schirmer I test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI questionnaire), tear break-up time (TBUT) and corneal staining were evaluated in two different visits: Baseline (before lens wear) and one-month visit (10 min after lens removal). Visual Analog Scale (VAS questionnaire) was filled in just after inserting the lenses and just before removing them. TFSQ mean and inferior were evaluated over the contact lens surface at the moment of inserting the lens (baseline visit) and after 8 h of lens wear (one-month visit).ResultsAnterior corneal surface TFSQ values increased in all groups after scleral lens wear (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistical differences found at the moment of inserting or after 8 h of lens wear on previous contact lens surface TFSQ (p > 0.05). No changes were found in tear volume for total and in KC and KCICRS groups (p > 0.05). For all groups, there was a statistical decrease of TBUT (p < 0.05). In addition, OSDI score, corneal staining and VAS score improved after scleral lens wear from baseline in total and in both KC and KCICRS groups (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe scleral contact lens surface keeps its wettability after one-month of wear. However, the wettability of the ocular surface is worse after contact lens wearing.     

Fluid reservoir thickness and corneal oedema during closed eye scleral lens wear

PurposeTo examine the relationship between central post-lens fluid reservoir thickness and central corneal oedema during short-term closed eye scleral lens wear, and to compare these empirical oedema measurements with open eye lens wear data and current theoretical modelling for overnight scleral lens wear.MethodsTen participants (mean ± standard error 30 ± 1 years) with normal corneas wore scleral lenses (Dk 141 × 10⁻¹¹ cm³ O₂(cm)/[(sec.)(cm²)(mmHg)) under closed eye conditions on separate days with an initial central post-lens fluid reservoir thickness considered to be low (160 ± 7 μm), medium (494 ± 17 μm), or high (716 ± 16 μm). Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal oedema were measured using high-resolution optical coherence tomography immediately after lens application and following 90 min of wear, prior to lens removal. Data were compared to open eye scleral lens induced corneal oedema and a theoretical model of overnight closed eye scleral lens wear (Kim et al., 2018).ResultsCentral corneal oedema was primarily stromal in nature and increased with increasing fluid reservoir thickness; the mean total corneal oedema was 3.86 ± 0.50%, 4.71 ± 0.28% and 5.04 ± 0.42% for the low, medium, and high thickness conditions, respectively. A significant difference in stromal and total corneal oedema was observed between the low and high fluid reservoir thickness conditions only (both p ≤ 0.01). Theoretical modelling overestimated the magnitude of central corneal oedema and the influence of fluid reservoir thickness upon corneal oedema during closed eye conditions.ConclusionScleral lens induced central corneal oedema during closed eye lens wear increases with increasing fluid reservoir thickness, but at a decreased rate compared to theoretical modelling.     

An acute clinical comparison of corneal staining and comfort associated with contact lens care solutions

PurposeThis study compared the biocompatibility and comfort of 4 lens care solutions currently marketed in France.MethodsThis was a randomized, interventional, double-masked, single-center crossover study assessing balafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses, bilaterally, straight from the blister pack solution (control) and pre-soaked in the following lens care solutions: Regard^® (containing sodium chlorite), ReNu^® (containing a PHMB [polyhexamethylene biguanide] derivative), CyClean™ and MeniCare™ Soft (both containing PHMB). Subjects were randomized to the order of test solution use. For each of the 5 solutions tested, subjects attended a baseline/lens dispensing visit and an intervention visit 2 h later. At both visits, evaluation included slit-lamp examination, corrected-distance visual acuity, corneal staining, and subject-assessed photophobia, ocular comfort, and ocular redness.ResultsThirty subjects were enrolled and 28 were evaluable. Corneal staining severity was significantly worse than baseline after 2 h of wearing lenses soaked in CyClean, MeniCare, or ReNu (P ≤ 0.001). The MeniCare group alone demonstrated a significant improvement in ocular comfort after 2 h of lens wear (P = 0.02). No group demonstrated significant changes in ocular redness or photophobia. Corrected-distance visual acuity was similar between baseline and intervention visits for each test solution. No adverse events were reported during the study.ConclusionsSilicone hydrogel contact lenses presoaked in lens solutions containing PHMB or a PHMB derivative produced an increase in corneal staining after 2 h of lens wear. The higher levels of corneal staining in the 2 solutions did not correlate with increased discomfort within this 2-h timeframe.     

Contact lens wear and care in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic

AimTo establish contact lens wear and care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain.MethodA 58-item anonymous online survey was distributed during the period 30th April to 10th May via Qualtrics. The survey explored: a) demographic characteristics (age, sex, general health and where they were living during lockdown), b) changes in their contact lens use during lockdown, c) hygiene and contact lens compliance and d) concerns associated with contact lens wear and ways to support wearers during the pandemic.ResultsTwo hundred and sixty responses were analysed (38.8 ± 11.4 years old, 75% female). Three-quarters of participants reported that they were self-isolating or rigorously following social distancing advice. Sixty-seven percent of participants reported using their contact lenses less during the pandemic. Respondents were found to be compliant with handwashing prior to inserting and removing contact lenses (in both cases 97% doing this ‘most times’ or ‘every time’). However, only 44 % complied with the ‘20 s rule’ and 48 % used a shared towel to dry their hands. A higher proportion of hydrogen peroxide users replaced the lens case monthly compared to multi-purpose users (64% vs.49%; p < 0.001). Twenty-four percent admitted wearing lenses whilst showering and 16% did not consider ceasing lens wear if feeling unwell with flu/cold symptoms.ConclusionEye care practitioners should continue to educate contact lens wearers to ensure safe contact lens wear to minimise the chance of developing contact lens related complications during the pandemic. Modifiable factors that need particular attention in Spain include: handwashing for at least 20s before lens handling, drying hands with single use paper towels, including a rub-and-rinse step for reusable lenses, lens case cleaning and renewal, avoidance of water exposure and when to cease lens wear during the pandemic.