Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers

AimTo determine if a gradual adaptation period is necessary for neophytes when fitted with modern hydrogel or silicone hydrogel reusable disposable contact lenses.MethodAcross four sites, 74 neophytes (18–28 years) were randomly assigned to a reusable lens cleaned nightly with Opti-Free® Puremoist® multi-purpose contact lens solution: Proclear® (hydrogel) or Biofinity® (silicone hydrogel) and an adaptation schedule: fast (10 h wear from the first day) or gradual (4 h on the first day, increasing their wear time by 2 h on each subsequent day until they had reached 10 h). Masked investigators graded ocular surface physiology and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) and a range of comfort, vision and lens handling subjective ratings (0–100 visual analogue scales) were recorded at the baseline visit and after 10 h of lens wear, 4–6 days and 12–14 days after lens fitting. Subjective scores were also repeated after 7 days.ResultsThere was no difference (p > 0.05) in ocular surface physiology or NIBUT between fast and gradual adaptation groups at any time point in either lens type with the exception of increased corneal staining (p = 0.019) in the silicone hydrogel fast adaptation group after 4–6 days, but was similar by 12–14 days. Subjective scores were also similar across the visits and lens types with the exception of ‘lens awareness’ (p = 0.019) which was less in the gradual versus the fast adaptation silicone hydrogel lens group at 12–14 days.ConclusionThere seems to be no clinical benefit for recommending a gradual adaptation period in new wearers fitted with modern soft reusable disposable contact lenses. The findings of this work add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that such advice is unnecessary in regular soft contact lens wear, which has important ramifications for the initial clinical management of these patients.     

Review of 20 years of soft contact lens wearer ocular physiology data

BackgroundSince the introduction of Silicone hydrogel (SiHy) contact lenses 20 years ago, industry has continued to modify lens materials, designs, lens care products and manufacturing processes, striving to improve contact lens physiological performance, comfort, and convenience for wearers. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the ocular health of habitual soft contact lens wearers today is better than it was in previous decades.MethodsBaseline ocular physiology data for 3624 participants from a The Brien Holden Vision Institute clinical trials database were retrospectively reviewed. Records were grouped into 3 time periods; A: >2 decades ago (1997–1999), B: one decade ago (2009–2014) and C: recent years (since 2015). Physiology data for both neophytes and habitual contact lens wearers included; bulbar, limbal and upper palpebral conjunctival redness, corneal and conjunctival staining and conjunctival indentation from contact lenses.ResultsCorneal staining levels are similar between neophytes and contact lens wearers at time points A and C but worse for contact lens wearers at time point B. Limbal redness was greater in contact lens wearers than in neophytes at time point A but at time points B and C they are not different to the non-contact lens wearing population. In recent years, most ocular physiological variables in habitual contact lens wearers are similar to neophytes.ConclusionsWhile there have been changes over the past two decades in ocular physiological responses to contact lens wear, it appears that ocular health with current day contact lens wear is similar to no lens wear in most respects.     

Novel in vitro method to determine pre-lens tear break-up time of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PurposeTo develop an in vitro model to determine pre-lens non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) and to subsequently use this method to compare the NIBUT over contemporary daily disposable (DD) contact lenses (CL).MethodsThree silicone hydrogel (SH) and two conventional hydrogel (CH) DD CLs were incubated in an artificial tear solution (ATS). A model blink cell (MBC) was utilised to mimic intermittent air exposure. CLs were repeatedly submerged for 3 seconds (s) and exposed to air for 10 s over periods of 2, 6, 12, and 16 hours (h). NIBUTs (n = 4) were determined out of the blister pack (T₀) and at the end of each incubation period.ResultsOverall, nesofilcon A showed the longest NIBUTs (p < 0.001). At T₀, CHs revealed significantly longer NIBUTs (p ≤ 0.001) than SHs. After 2 h, nesofilcon A showed the longest NIBUT, however, this was only statistically significant compared with delefilcon A (p ≤ 0.001). After 6 h, nesofilcon A NIBUT was significantly longer than all other CLs (p ≤ 0.001). Etafilcon A showed a significantly longer NIBUT (p ≤ 0.001) after 12 h and delefilcon A had the longest NIBUT (p ≤ 0.001) after 16 h. Statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) changes of NIBUT within the lens materials varied between time points. After 16 h, all CLs showed significant reductions in NIBUTs (p ≤ 0.001) in comparison to T₀.ConclusionNIBUT values reduced gradually over time and varying levels of deposition impacted measured pre-lens NIBUTs. While NIBUT of CH materials are longer immediately out of the blister pack, after tear film exposure, the NIBUTs obtained using this methodology became very similar.     

Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8)

PurposeContact lens dry eye questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) quantifies the disturbing symptoms with the aim of assessing the satisfaction and overall opinion of contact lens wearers. The aim of this study was to develop Turkish version and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the questionnaire.MethodsCLDEQ-8 was translated into Turkish language, using the back translation methods. In a sample of 10 individuals, validation of translation was checked as pre-test evaluation. Turkish version of CLDEQ-8 questionnaire was conducted in 100 soft contact lens wearers. Validity was investigated using Rasch analysis and reliability by Cronbach’s alpha (α) and person separation index (PSI).ResultsThe participants were healthy other than refractive errors. Their mean age was 25.19 ± 7.03 years and male to female ratio was 14/86. All of them were silicone-hydrogel soft contact lens wearers. Their contact lens history was 3.13 ± 3.77 years and mean refraction error was -2.69 ± 1.64 diopters.The whole 8 items were consistent with the Rasch model (p > 0.05) and unidimensional (paired t test, p = 0.1). Both Cronbach’s alpha and PSI values were higher than 0.7 (α = 0.873, PSI = 0.867). There were not functional differences in questionnaire items regarding overall age groups (Andersen LR test, p = 0.518).ConclusionTurkish version of the CLDEQ-8 conforms to the Rasch model and provides the one dimensional assumption. The questionnaire has internal consistency, is valid and reliable in Turkish contact lens wearers.     

The effect of lens wear on refractive index of conventional hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the ability of four silicone-hydrogel contact lenses (galyfilcon A, balafilcon A, lotrafilcon A and lotrafilcon B) to retain their equilibrium water content before and after wear, through measurements of refractive index and compare with that of a conventional disposable hydrogel contact lens (etafilcon A). METHODS: The refractive indices of 115 contact lenses were measured using an automated refractometer (CLR 12-70, Index Instruments, Cambridge, U.K.) before and after a schedule of daily wear by 58 patients for 30 days in the case of silicone-hydrogel lenses and 15 days for the conventional contact lenses. RESULTS: In the silicone-hydrogel contact lenses the changes on the refractive indices were not statistically significant, however after being worn the refractive index of the conventional etalfilcon A hydrogel contact lens increased significantly (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results presented here show that after being worn the silicone-hydrogel contact lens, show more capacity to retain or to reach their initial equilibrium water content than conventional hydrogel contact lenses. This suggests that the silicone-hydrogel contact lenses are less susceptible to spoilation over time maintaining its biocompatibility and contributing to the clinical success of lens performance.     

Exploring non-adherence to contact lens wear schedule: Subjective assessments and patient related factors in children wearing single vision and myopia control contact lenses

PurposeTo determine factors associated with non-adherence to contact lens wear schedule involving single vision and myopia control contact lenses in children.MethodsData from 379 children enrolled in a prospective, double masked, randomized clinical trial, aged 8–13 years, cycloplegic spherical equivalent of -0.75 to -3.50D and wearing either: single vision silicone hydrogel (SiH) CL (control lens); two anti-myopia SiH CL that incorporated relative plus in the central and periphery in a stepped manner (test lens I and II); and two extended depth of focus hydrogel CL (test lens III and IV) was considered. A questionnaire was administered to the participants at every scheduled visit and gathered information on days of wear/week and subjective assessments of ocular comfort and visual quality on an analog scale of 1–10.Participants were categorized as “Adherent” when lens wear was ≥ 6 days/week or “Non-adherent” when lens wear ≤ 5 days/week. Categorized adherence data was summarized as a percentage across visits for each CL type. Differences between the two groups were analyzed using linear mixed model.ResultsFor the control lens, 79.6 % participants were adherent as compared to 63.7%–74.6% with test lenses (p=0.026). Non-adherence was greater in those that discontinued (p<0.001). Subjective ratings of visual quality for static and dynamic tasks were lower with non-adherent wearers and more variable between visits. Ocular comfort was also poorer in non-adherent wearers irrespective of lens material or lens design. Male gender, lower baseline myopia, lower high contrast visual acuity and esophoria were associated with a higher risk of non-adherence.ConclusionsThe study identified a wide range of factors associated with non-adherence to lens wear schedule. Paying specific attention to these factors when evaluating patients for CL wear and taking steps to ensure satisfaction in lens wear may promote longer term continuation of wear.     

Pre-contact lens and pre-corneal tear film kinetics

PurposeContact lenses (CL) insulate the corneal surface from the environment. It is possible that they influence the corneal sensory mechanism that contribute to spontaneous blinking. The study objective was to quantify the pre-CL and pre-corneal tear film kinetics (TFK) over blink period.MethodsThe study population was 202 soft CL wearers, 133 non-lens wearers. TFK were quantified via post-hoc masked analysis of HD Tearscope videos. The parameters were: Non-Invasive Break Up Time (NIBUT), Exposed Area % at initial break (EA 1st Break) and at blink (EA Blink), Interblink period (IB), Protective Index (PI) and exposure speed of surface dehydration (ES mm2/s). The TFK of CL wearers were compared to non-lens wearers. The hypothesis was that pre-CL TFK was inferior to pre-corneal, specifically greater tear film anomalies presence at blink.ResultsThe pre-corneal NIBUT was longer than pre-CL NIBUT (9.1 vs. 5.1s, p < 0.001). The EA 1st Break was smaller for pre-corneal than pre-CL (0.003 vs. 0.43%, p < 0.001). The mean IB time was similar for pre-CL and pre-corneal (9.4 vs. 9.8s, p = 0.213). The EA Blink % was smaller for pre-corneal than pre-CL (0.03 vs. 6.66%, p < 0.001). The ES was faster for pre-CL than pre-corneal (0.339 vs. 0.004, p < 0.001). The PI was greater for pre-corneal than pre-CL (99.9 vs. 97.1%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsPre-CL TFK were significantly inferior than pre-corneal, confirmed the hypothesis. The NIBUT was shorter. Once the initial break occurred, ES was faster, and EA was much greater for pre-CL than pre-corneal. The differences identified may be an aetiological component of CL discomfort and the relationship between TFK and discomfort in contact lens wearers should be investigated.     

Quantification of contact lens wettability after prolonged visual device use under low humidity conditions

Purpose: Discomfort of silicone hydrogel (SiHy) contact lenses (CL) is associated with longer wearing time, demanding visual tasks, and dry environments. This study investigated the impact of challenging environmental conditions on thewettability of four daily disposable SiHy CL. Methods: Habitual wearers of delefilcon A (n=32) and somofilcon A (n=32) were tested with their habitual lenses and with stenfilcon A and narafilcon A lenses. Digital videos were captured using non-invasive Tearscope illumination after 3 hrs of conventional wear and 3 hrs of computer use at 20% relative humidity (RH). Masked investigators analysed non-invasive break up time (NIBUT), minimum protected area (MPA) ofthe lens surface by the tear film, and dehydration speed (DS) over the interblink period after exposure to 20% RH.Results: For habitual delefilcon A wearers, mean NIBUT was longer with delefilcon A (9.2 sec) than stenfilcon A (6.3 sec, p = 0.052) and narafilcon A (5.1 sec, p = 0.006); mean MPA was significantly higher with delefilcon A (95.4%)than stenfilcon A (84.4%, p = 0.002) and narafilcon A (82.9%, p = 0.006); mean DS was lower with delefilcon A (0.28 mm2/sec) than stenfilcon A (0.81 mm2/sec, p = 0.002) and narafilcon A (0.60 mm2/sec, p = 0.056). For habitual somofilcon A wearers, mean MPA was lower for narafilcon A (76.2%) than for somofilcon A (89.0%, p < 0.001) but not stenfilcon A (88.4%, p = 0.748) and mean DS was higher for narafilcon A (0.96 mm2/sec) than somofilcon A (0.60mm2/sec, p = 0.029) but not stenfilcon A (0.51 mm2/sec, p = 0.701). Conclusions: Delefilcon A CL performed betterthan stenfilcon A and narafilcon A after 6 hrs of wear including 3 hrs intensive visual tasks under challenging environmental conditions. Delefilcon A CL may be preferable for CL wearers with intensive computers and/or digital devices usage.     

Clinical performance of daily disposable soft contact lenses using sustained release technology.

PURPOSE: Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is a successful tear film stabiliser and is widely used in comfort drops and some soft contact lens materials. A PVA-containing lens, nelfilcon A has been modified to include additional (non-functional) PVA in order to provide improved comfort. This study aims to examine the clinical performance of this nelfilcon A lens with AquaRelease (AquaRelease). METHODS: Two contralateral, investigator masked, open label, subjective and objective evaluations were conducted. The first examined the effect of adding increased molecular weight PVA to nelfilcon A (n=5), and the second compared this AquaRelease lens to ocufilcon B (n=34). The principal measures were non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) and subjective comfort, which were assessed at the beginning and end of a week of daily wear, and three times throughout 1 day at 8, 12 and 16 h. RESULTS: All subjects successfully completed the daily wearing schedule of 16h. On initial insertion, subjective comfort and NIBUT improved for AquaRelease than original nelfilcon A lenses (p<0.05). Initial comfort was better for AquaRelease compared to ocufilcon B lenses (p=0.01); however, NIBUT was not statistically different (11.7+/-15.6s versus 8.4+/-6.8s; p=0.26). Subjective comfort decreased with time (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference between AquaRelease and ocufilcon B lenses (p=0.16). NIBUT was not significantly affected by time (p=0.56) or between lenses (p=0.33). At the end of a weeks' wear, subjective initial, end-of-day, overall comfort and vision were rated significantly better with AquaRelease than ocufilcon B (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Release of additional non-functionalised PVA from the nelfilcon A lenses appears to enhance comfortable contact lens wear.     

A measure of tear inflow in habitual scleral lens wearers with and without midday fogging

PurposeThe purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate tear inflow in a scleral lens system using fluorophotometry, and indirectly assess the exchange of the tear reservoir in habitual scleral lens wearers with the presence or absence of midday fogging (MDF).MethodsHabitual scleral lens wearers (n=23) and normal scleral lens neophytes (n=10) were recruited. Of the 23 habitual wearers, 11 of them experienced MDF and 12 did not have a diagnosis of MDF. Contact lens-fitting characteristics were evaluated using ocular coherence tomograpy (OCT) and biomicroscopy. High molecular weight fluorescein (FITC) Dextran was instilled into the tear reservoir beneath the scleral lens, and the tear fluid fluorescein concentration was measured using the Fluorotron fluorophotometer. Calculated fluorescein concentrations were plotted over time to measure the fluorescein decay rate of the tear fluid beneath the scleral lens, which was used to calculate the tear exchange rate.ResultsThere was no significant difference in tear inflow between the MDF group (mean: 0.111%) and the non-MDF group (mean: 0.417%), and there was a high amount of variability seen in the rates (p = 0.26). In addition, there was no significance between the tear reservoir thickness in the MDF (283um) and non-MDF (326um) groups (p = 0.53).ConclusionsThe relationship between the amount of tear exchange during scleral lens wear and the incidence of MDF was not significant. Additional studies are needed to further examine the role of tear exchange in MDF and address the causes of variability to improve measurement techniques with fluorophotometry in the scleral lens system.     

A study of contact lens compliance in a non-clinical setting

PurposeTo evaluate soft contact lens replacement, overnight (ON) wear, and contact lens case compliance in a non-clinical sample.MethodsSubjects (n = 297) were recruited at the Center for Science and Industry (COSI) in Columbus, Ohio. Adult (≥ 18 years) soft contact lens wearers completed a survey about contact lens replacement, ON contact lens wear, and contact lens case replacement habits.ResultsTwo-week replacement lenses (according to the manufacturer’s replacement schedule [MRS]) were most common (45.5%), followed by monthly (34.3%) and daily replacement (20.2%). Non-compliance with replacement schedule was reported in 38.7% of subjects. Age (p = 0.02), years of lens wear (p = 0.02), and MRS (p <0.0001) affected replacement compliance. Post-hoc analysis showed daily replacement wearers were more compliant than two-week (p <0.0001) and monthly (p <0.0001) replacement wearers with prescribed lens replacement. Non-compliance with prescribed ON wear was reported in 23.9% of subjects. Subjects who were non-compliant with lens replacement were more likely to be non-compliant with ON wear (p = 0.02) and had worn contact lenses for less time (p = 0.02). Of the subjects who used contact lens cases, 74.6% were unsure when they should replace their case. Frequency of case replacement was not associated with age (p = 0.5), gender (p = 0.5), years of contact lens wear (p = 0.7), MRS (p = 0.4), replacement compliance (p = 0.3), or ON wear compliance (p = 0.7).ConclusionsDaily replacement wearers were most likely to be compliant with contact lens replacement, but all subjects, including daily replacement wearers, had similar ON wear non-compliance. Non-compliant lens replacement was associated with non-compliant ON wear, but contact lens case replacement was not related to either compliance category. The majority of subjects had no knowledge of proper contact lens case replacement, despite compliance in other categories.     

Compatibility of phospholipid liposomal spray with silicone hydrogel contact lens wear

Purpose

To assess the effects of two weeks of regular phospholipid liposomal spray application on lipid layer grade, tear film stability, subjective comfort, visual acuity, and lipid deposition in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.

The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature.

AIM: To determine the dynamic emitted temperature changes of the anterior eye during and immediately after wearing different materials and modalities of soft contact lenses. METHOD: A dynamic, non-contact infrared camera (Thermo-Tracer TH7102MX, NEC San-ei) was used to record the ocular surface temperature (OST) in 48 subjects (mean age 21.7 +/- 1.9 years) wearing: lotrafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily wear (LDW; n=8) or continuous wear (LCW; n=8) basis; balafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily wear (BDW; n=8) or continuous wear (BCW; n=8) basis; etafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily disposable regimen (EDW; n=8); and no lenses (controls; n=8). OST was measured continuously five times, for 8s after a blink, following a minimum of 2h wear and immediately following lens removal. Absolute temperature, changes in temperature post-blink and the dynamics of temperature changes were calculated. RESULTS: OST immediately following contact lens wear was significantly greater compared to non-lens wearers (37.1 +/- 1.7 degrees C versus 35.0 +/- 1.1 degrees C; p < 0.005), predominantly in the LCW group (38.6 +/- 1.0 degrees C; p < 0.0001). Lens surface temperature was highly correlated (r=0.97) to, but lower than OST (by -0.62 +/- 0.3 degrees C). There was no difference with modality of wear (DW 37.5 +/- 1.6 degrees C versus CW 37.8+/-1.9 degrees C; p=0.63), but significant differences were found between etafilcon A and silicone hydrogel lens materials (35.3 +/- 1.1 degrees C versus 37.5 +/- 1.5 degrees C; p < 0.0005). Ocular surface cooling following a blink was not significantly affected by contact lens wear with (p=0.07) or without (p=0.47) lenses in situ. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular surface temperature is greater with hydrogel and greater still with silicone hydrogel contact lenses in situ, regardless of modality of wear. The effect is likely to be due to the thermal transmission properties of a contact lens.     

Changes in accommodative micro-fluctuations after wearing contact lenses of different optical designs

PurposeAccommodative micro-fluctuations (AMF) are small dioptric changes during accommodation. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare changes in AMF when wearing silicone hydrogel contact lenses of two different optical designs.MethodsA multi-centre, randomised, cross-over, non-dispensing study was conducted on 68 adapted contact lens wearers aged 25–35 years to compare AMF responses to a spherical and aspheric silicone hydrogel (comfilcon A) lens designs. A Righton Speedy “i” series Auto Refractometer in accommodation analyser mode was utilized before and after reading a standard text in font size 8 on an iPhone 5 for 20 min at a 25 cm viewing distance. Phone screen brightness was set by automatic adjustment mode and ambient illumination was controlled at all sites.ResultsMean ± SD AMF change from before to after the reading task was 2.25 ± 5.6 and 0.13 ± 5.7 (relative values) for the spherical and aspheric lens designs, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.017, Paired t-test).ConclusionsThe smaller change in AMF when using an aspheric lens design suggests reduced ciliary muscle stress when reading print on a smart phone at a close distance for short periods (20 min). Contact lens wearers who frequently use digital devices and are experiencing eye strain may benefit from switching from a spherical design to one that incorporates aspheric optics.     

Monitoring ocular discomfort using a wrist-mounted electronic logger

PurposeTo investigate ocular discomfort during contact lens wear using a wrist-mounted electronic ‘lens awareness logger’ (LAL).MethodsThirty symptomatic contact lens wearers wore study contact lenses for three days. On the first two days, two lens types which are known to differ in end-of-day comfort (lens A: senofilcon A and lens B: balafilcon A), were worn as a matching pair (randomised order). On day three, a pair of lens B was worn. On each day, the participant used a LAL. On day one and two, the participant pressed a button on the LAL whenever they became aware of their lenses due to discomfort. On day three, the participant used a multiple click protocol (1 = mild awareness to 3 = severe awareness) to report discomfort.ResultsLAL events were similar on days one and two (17.3 vs. 15.8 events per day). There were significantly more LAL events for lens B (21.6 events per day) in comparison with lens A (11.6 events per day) (p = 0.006). The LAL event profile highlighted peaks in awareness following lens application and towards the end of the wearing cycle. Comparison of the LAL event profile for the two lens types showed significant differences in lens awareness, particularly in the first half of the wearing cycle. LAL events on day 3, showed a uniform distribution of single and double clicks through the day, but a marked peak in triple clicks in the last two hours of lens wear.ConclusionThe LAL was able to differentiate between the study lenses and demonstrated differences in their LAL event profiles. Lens awareness associated with discomfort appeared to increase not only in frequency, but also in intensity towards the end of the wearing cycle. The ability of the LAL to track lens awareness suggests it is likely to be a useful tool in furthering understanding of ocular discomfort.     

The impact of contact lens wear on ocular surface mucins using a novel clinical fluorescence imaging system

PurposeFluorescein-labelled wheat germ agglutinin (F-WGA) acts as a marker for ocular surface mucins. This clinical study sought to investigate whether the degree of F-WGA fluorescence observed at the ocular surface differed between symptomatic contact lens wearers, asymptomatic contact lens wearers and non-contact lens wearers, using a novel imaging system.MethodsTwenty-five participants (10 symptomatic contact lens wearers, 10 asymptomatic contact lens wearers and 5 non-contact lens wearers) attended a single study visit. Photographs of the cornea, bulbar and tarsal conjunctiva were captured following application of F-WGA solution.ResultsThe imaging system captured high-resolution images of F-WGA fluorescence at the ocular surface. The degree of fluorescence differed between the ocular surface regions (p < 0.001). A significant difference in fluorescence was observed between participant groups for the cornea (p = 0.01), with both the symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers showing lower fluorescence than the non-lens wearers. F-WGA associated fluorescence appeared diminished in the lid wiper region of the symptomatic lens wearers, compared to the asymptomatic group (p = 0.025).ConclusionThe use of F-WGA as a clinical marker for ocular surface mucins allows an improved understanding of their distribution across the ocular surface. Contact lens wear appears to negatively impact mucin density across the ocular surface, with the most marked effect on the cornea. F-WGA fluorescence appeared diminished in the lid wiper region for the symptomatic contact lens wearing group, indicating that mechanical interaction in this region may play a role in the aetiology of contact lens discomfort. Given the ability of F-WGA to disclose mucin distribution across the ocular surface it is likely to be a key clinical tool in furthering our understanding of (i) the aetiology of contact lens related discomfort, (ii) contact lens designs/materials to minimise interaction with the ocular surface and (iii) dry eye disease and other ocular surface diseases.     

Changes in visual quality with soft contact lenses after the instillation of hyaluronic acid eye drops

PurposeTo evaluate the changes in visual function and anterior surface aberrations during soft contact lens (SCL) wear after the instillation of hyaluronic acid (HA) eye drops with different viscosity.MethodsA prospective, randomized, and participant-masked study was performed. Twenty healthy participants (25.4 ± 2.6 years) were evaluated. Hydrogel (Ocufilcon D) and silicone-hydrogel (Somofilcon A) SCL were randomly assigned to both eyes of the same participant. Visual function in terms of high- and low-contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and anterior contact lens surface aberrations (RMS HOA) were measured before and after the instillation, at different times, of different eye drops: saline (control) and 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3% HA.ResultsCompared with the saline solution, during hydrogel SCL wear, there was an improvement (P < 0.05) in high-contrast CDVA after 3 and 10 min with 0.1% HA, and after 5 and 20 min with 0.2% HA. During silicone-hydrogel SCL wear, there was a deterioration (P < 0.05) in high-contrast CDVA after 1 and 30 min with 0.3% HA. Additionally, during silicone-hydrogel SCL wear, there was also a deterioration (P < 0.05) in low-contrast CDVA after 5 and 20 min with 0.3% HA. In terms of RMS HOA, there were no clinically relevant changes with both SCL.ConclusionsThe instillation of HA eye drops could have a different effect on visual quality depending on their concentration of HA, the contact lens material, its surface ionicity, or other physicochemical properties that should be studied in future studies.     

Effect of age and contact lens wear on corneal epithelial dendritic cell distribution,density, and morphology

PurposeContact lens wearers aged 15–25 years are at higher risk of corneal inflammation, yet little is known about corneal inflammatory state in this group. Previous investigations show density of corneal epithelial dendritic cells (CEDC) may increase with contact lens wear. However, it is not known how corneal distribution or morphology of CEDC alters with lens wear or whether these markers are affected by age. This study characterised CEDC in adolescent and young adult contact lens wearers to determine effects of contact lens wear and age on CEDC density, distribution and morphology.MethodForty participants (20 contact lens wearers, 20 healthy non-wearers; age 16–36 years; 16M:24F) completed this pilot study. Corneal images were captured using in vivo confocal microscopy (HRTII, Rostock). CEDC were manually counted in a 1 mm² area of the central and mid-peripheral cornea, and ratio of central to midperipheral density was calculated. CEDC morphology and dendrite length were graded. Differences between groups and between regions, and associations with age were examined. Significance was determined at P < 0.05.ResultsA lower ratio of central to mid-peripheral CEDC density was found with younger age (ρ = 0.42, P = 0.01). CEDC morphology was not associated with age or contact lens wear. CEDC density in the mid-peripheral cornea was higher in soft lens wearers than non-wearers (P = 0.04), but central density did not differ. CEDC density and morphology were not significantly different between centre (median density 11 cells/mm², range 0–120) and mid-periphery (10 cells/mm², 0–58).ConclusionDensity, distribution and morphology of CEDC do not differ in established contact lens wearers. A relatively lower density of CEDC in the central cornea of younger patients may allude to a more naive immune status in this group and warrants further study. Decreased central CEDC density identified in orthokeratology lens wear requires confirmation in a larger group.     

The eyelids and tear film in contact lens discomfort

Purpose

To investigate characteristics of the eyelid margins, meibomian glands and the tear film of contact lens wearers, and to determine whether these characteristics were related to symptoms of contact lens discomfort.