Salmeterol xinafoate as maintenance therapy compared with albuterol in patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, with that of albuterol, a short-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist, in the treatment of asthma. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Eleven outpatient clinical centers. SUBJECTS: A total of 322 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with chronic symptomatic asthma requiring daily therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with salmeterol xinafoate (42 micrograms inhaled twice daily), albuterol (180 micrograms inhaled four times daily), or placebo (four times a day) for 12 weeks; patients in all three groups could use inhaled albuterol as backup medication for breakthrough symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serial 12-hour forced expiratory flow in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings due to asthma, episodes of asthma exacerbations, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: The mean area under the curve for FEV1 throughout each 12-hour period was consistently greater after a single dose of salmeterol than after two doses of albuterol administered 6 hours apart (P < .001), with the difference ranging from 3.1 to 4.3 L.h. Salmeterol produced an average increase in morning and evening PEF of 26 and 29 L/min, respectively, over pretreatment values compared with decreases of -13 and -3 L/min, respectively, in the albuterol group and -2 L/min both in the morning and evening in the placebo group (P < .001). Patients in the salmeterol group had significantly fewer days and nights with symptoms than did either the albuterol or placebo group (P < .001). Responses to salmeterol were similar at day 1 and at week 12. Adverse events in all treatment groups were equally infrequent, and no clinically significant change in cardiac rhythm was observed with salmeterol treatment. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol inhaled twice daily is more effective than albuterol inhaled four times a day (or as needed) in patients with asthma requiring maintenance therapy. No deterioration of asthma control was observed with the use of salmeterol over a 3-month period.     

Overnight protection by inhaled salmeterol on exercise-induced asthma in children

The main aim of the present study was to evaluate whether inhaled salmeterol given in the evening protected against exercise-induced asthma the next morning. Twenty three children (12 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 11 yrs and with exercise-induced asthma participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. The children inhaled salmeterol 25 micrograms, salmeterol 50 micrograms and placebo by Diskhaler at 10 p.m. on 3 separate days. Next morning, half of the children ran on a motor-driven treadmill for 6 min at submaximal load at 8 a.m. and the remainder at 10 a.m. Lung function was measured by maximal expiratory flow-volume loops before running, immediately after, and 3, 6, 10 and 15 min after running. The mean maximum reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) after treadmill run was 34% before inclusion in the study. Mean maximum fall in FEV1 was significantly greater after placebo: 30% (23-36) 95% confidence interval) than after salmeterol 25 micrograms: 19% (12-23) or salmeterol 50 micrograms: 18% (12-25). In addition to the reduced postexercise bronchoconstriction, pre-exercise lung function (FEV1) was significantly higher both after salmeterol 25 micrograms: 2.4 L.s-1 (2.1-2.7) and salmeterol 50 micrograms: 2.5 L.s-1 (2.2-2.8) than after placebo: 2.2 L.s-1 (1.9-2.5). No significant differences in pre- and postexercise lung function were found between children tested at 8 or 10 a.m., or in relation to salmeterol dosage. Thus, inhaled salmeterol 25 and 50 micrograms offered similar overnight protection against exercise-induced asthma and improved baseline lung function in the morning as compared to placebo.     

Effect of addition of inhaled salmeterol to the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthmatics uncontrolled on high-dose inhaled steroids. European Respiratory Study Group

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol 100 micrograms b.d. (SM) versus inhaled salbutamol 400 micrograms q.d.s. (SB), both via the Diskhaler, when added to concurrent treatment, in asthmatic patients who were not controlled on high doses of inhaled steroids (> or = 1,500 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or equivalent daily). This was a multicentre, parallel group, double-blind study in which 190 patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) or peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of 30-75% predicted and 15% reversibility to inhaled bronchodilator were randomized to treatment for 6 weeks. In the SM group, morning PEFR increased from 281 to 315 L-min-1 during treatment and in the SB group from 311 to 315 L.min-1 (p < 0.001). The SM group showed significantly better reduction in diurnal variation, from 39 to 22 L.min-1 during treatment, than the SB group (34 to 37 L.min-1) (p < 0.001). There was a significantly greater improvement in FEV1 in the SM group (from 1.63 to 1.85 L) than in the SB group (from 1.79 to 1.84 L). The SM group had significantly more symptom-free nights than the SB group (p < 0.001), and also more "rescue-free" nights (p = 0.04). The adverse event profile was similar in both groups. This study indicates that in asthmatic patients, not controlled on high-dose inhaled steroids, inhaled salmeterol 100 micrograms b.d. significantly improves lung function and reduces asthma symptoms.     

Tolerance to the protective effects of salmeterol on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction: influence of inhaled corticosteroids

Long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists such as salmeterol reduce airway responsiveness for at least 12 h, but this effect seems to decrease with regular use. We evaluated the time-course of the protective effects of salmeterol on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, its modulation by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and its influence on asthma control. Thirty two subjects (13 males and 19 females) with mild to moderate stable asthma were divided into two groups according to their medication needs: bronchodilators (BD) alone (n=16) or with ICS (n=16). After a 2 week run-in period, a double-blind crossover study was conducted. Subjects from both groups received salmeterol 50 microg b.i.d. or a placebo for 4 weeks each in random order, separated by a 2 week washout period. The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) was measured before and after each treatment period, 1 h prior to inhalation of salmeterol or placebo and 1 and 12 h after. Baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) increased significantly after salmeterol, both after the first dose and at 4 weeks (BD group: 19 and 17%; ICS: 22 and 13%). On the first day of administration, salmeterol provided significant protection in both groups up to 12 h with a PC20 before and 1 and 12 h postdose of 2.2, 21.7 and 12.4, mg x mL(-1), respectively, in the BD group and 2.1, 11.6 and 55 mg x mL(-1), respectively, in the ICS group. After 4 weeks, this effect was significantly attenuated in both groups with a PC20 before, 1 and 12 h postdose of 3.3, 10.9 and 7.1 mg x mL(-1), respectively, in the BD group and 2.1, 5.0 and 2.3 mg x mL(-1), respectively, in the ICS group. This loss of protective effect was of similar magnitude in both groups. Respiratory symptoms, rescue beta2-agonist use and baseline FEV1 did not change significantly throughout the study in both groups. In conclusion, the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol decreased with regular use both 1 and 12 h postdose; inhaled corticosteroids did not prevent this reduction. However, the development of tolerance was not associated with loss of asthma control.     

Clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide once or twice daily in children with mild asthma not previously treated with steroids

The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide (BUD) administered via Turbuhaler once or twice daily on symptoms, lung function and bronchial hyperreactivity in children with mild asthma. One hundred and sixty-three children (mean age 9.9 yrs, 56 females/107 males) with mild asthma (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 103% of predicted, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 87% pred, reversibility in FEV1 3%, fall in FEV1 after exercise 10.4% from pre-exercise value) and not previously treated with inhaled steroids, were included in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. After a two-week run-in period, the children received inhaled BUD 100 microg or 200 microg once daily in the morning, 100 microg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Exercise and methacholine challenges were performed before and at the end of treatment. After 12 weeks of therapy, the fall in FEV1 after an exercise test was significantly less in all three BUD groups (43-5.1%) than in the placebo group (8.6%). Bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine with the provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 decreased significantly in the BUD 100 microg twice-daily group compared with placebo (ratio at the end of treatment 156%). Changes in baseline lung function (FEV1 and PEF) were less marked than changes in bronchial responsiveness. In conclusion, low doses of inhaled budesonide, given once or twice daily, provided protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with mild asthma and near normal lung function.     

Efficacy and safety of salmeterol in childhood asthma

In children with asthma, twice daily administration of salmeterol 25 micrograms, salmeterol 50 micrograms and salbutamol 200 micrograms were compared in two, 3-month, double-blind, parallel group studies, one using metered dose inhalers (MDIs), the other using dry powder inhalers (Diskhaler, DPIs). Both studies were continued for a further 9 months during which time exacerbation rates, lung function at the clinic and adverse events were monitored. Similarities in design and methodology of the two studies justified a combined analysis. Eight hundred and forty-seven asthmatic children aged between 4 and 16 (mean 10.1) years, requiring inhaled beta 2-agonist treatment were randomised to treatment. After a 2 week run-in when all bronchodilator therapy was withdrawn, 279 patients received salmeterol 25 micrograms bd, 290 patients salmeterol 50 micrograms bd and 278 patients salbutamol 200 micrograms bd. After 3 months' treatment the change from baseline in daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was significantly greater with salmeterol 50 micrograms bd than with salbutamol 200 micrograms bd (P < 0.001). Salmeterol 50 micrograms bd was also significantly better than salmeterol 25 micrograms bd at improving mean morning PEF (P = 0.017) but both treatments had a similar effect on evening PEF. Analysis of variance showed an interaction between baseline PEF less than 100% predicted normal value and treatment outcome. Analysis of this sub-set of patients with lower lung function revealed similar results to the total population although the improvements in PEF from baseline were greater. Data from both studies, showed that the improvement in lung function was maintained throughout 12 months' treatment. Patients receiving salmeterol 50 micrograms bd had significantly more symptom-free nights (P < 0.01) and a higher percentage of rescue bronchodilator-free days (P = 0.01). The incidence of asthma exacerbations was evenly distributed between the three treatment groups and there was no evidence of any change in the rate of occurrence of exacerbations over the 12 month period. Adverse events were no different across treatment groups or across age groups and were primarily related to the patients' disease state. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol 50 micrograms bd is the appropriate dose for the treatment of children with mild to moderate asthma.     

An inhaled steroid improves markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma

Airway inflammation can be demonstrated in mildly asthmatic patients who are not treated with inhaled steroids. Current guidelines recommend that inhaled steroids should be introduced in mild asthmatics who use an inhaled beta2-agonist more than once daily. It was postulated that inhaled steroids can have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with even milder disease. The effect of 4 weeks of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily by Turbohaler) was studied in 10 steroid-naive mildly asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 96+/-1.4% predicted) who required an inhaled beta2-agonist less than one puff daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), and sputum induction were performed before and after each treatment period. Following budesonide treatment, there were significant improvements in FEV1, and PC20, in association with a significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled NO levels tended towards reduction, but the change was nonsignificant. There were also nonsignificant reductions in sputum eosinophil cationic protein and tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels. In conclusion inhaled budesonide can lead to improvements in noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, in association with a small improvement in lung function, even in mildly asthmatic patients who require an inhaled beta2-agonist less than once daily. This suggests a potential benefit of inhaled corticosteroids, even in relatively asymptomatic asthma.     

Comparison of addition of theophylline to inhaled steroid with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroid in asthma

The anti-asthmatic effect of theophylline may supplement those of inhaled steroids in asthma. The aim of the present trial was to study how the addition of theophylline compares to doubling the dose of inhaled steroid in asthmatics who remain symptomatic on beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 400 micrograms/day. The trial was designed as a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in several European countries. 69 patients were treated for 6 weeks with theophylline plus BDP 400 micrograms/day, compared to 64 patients treated with BDP 800 micrograms/day. The mean +/- SD serum theophylline concentration was 10.1 +/- 4.2 mg/l. Lung function measurements were made throughout the study and patients kept daily records of peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), symptoms and salbutamol usage. Forced expiratory volume in one second and PEF at week 6 were significantly increased by both treatments (p < 0.01). PEF variability was reduced by about 30% in both groups. There were significant improvements in asthma symptoms and rescue medication use (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups. The study demonstrated clinical equivalence of theophylline plus beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day and beclomethasone dipropionate 800 micrograms/day in patients whose asthma is not controlled on beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/d. The results support the use of theophylline as steroid-sparing agent. The combination of low-dose inhaled steroid plus theophylline is a suitable treatment for moderate asthma.     

Total blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil protein X in childhood asthma: relation to disease status and therapy

Blood eosinophils, and serum levels of the eosinophil proteins, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) were measured in childhood asthma. Seventeen patients mean age 11.9 years who were symptomatic with asthma, were enrolled in a study examining the eosinophil counts and eosinophil proteins at the onset of study and after treatment in relation to changes in their baseline forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) and % predicted FEV1. The patients with symptomatic asthma were compared with 17 patients mean age 12.0 years with asymptomatic asthma maintained on daily inhaled steroid and 13 patients, mean age 12.0 years, without asthma but with urticaria who served as non-asthma controls. Patients with symptomatic asthma did not have significantly higher initial eosinophil counts compared with those with asymptomatic asthma (0.43 x 10(9)/l vs 0.26 x 10(9)/l, P = 0.09) but had higher serum ECP levels (28.9 micrograms/l vs 18.5 micrograms/l). Both asthma patient groups had significantly higher serum ECP levels (P < 0.01) than the controls (9.8 micrograms/l). After therapy consisting of increased dose of inhaled steroids and/or oral steroids, patients in the symptomatic asthma group demonstrated a significant rise in FEV1 (1.67 l/sec at Visit 1 vs 2.08 l/sec at Visit 2, P < 0.001). A similar rise was seen for % predicted FEV1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of salmeterol on nocturnal symptoms, airway function, and inflammation in asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of salmeterol alone in a group of patients with moderate asthma with nocturnal worsening of symptoms. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital specializing in respiratory diseases. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients with nocturnal asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to salmeterol, 100 micrograms twice daily, or placebo for 6 weeks with a 1-week washout between treatment periods. Symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, and beta 2-agonist use were recorded daily. Spirometry was performed at weeks 1 and 6 of each period at bedtime and at 4 AM, and methacholine challenge was performed at 4 AM followed by bronchoscopy with BAL. BAL fluid analysis included cell count and differential count, eosinophil cationic protein, Charcot-Leyden crystal protein, leukotriene B4, and thromboxane B2. RESULTS: The percentage of nights with awakenings decreased significantly with salmeterol (69.8 +/- 8.7% vs 30.6 +/- 10.8% for placebo and salmeterol, respectively; p = 0.02). The percentage of 24-h days with supplemental inhaled beta 2-agonist use significantly decreased with salmeterol (85.9 +/- 9.4% vs 70.4 +/- 10.1% for placebo and salmeterol, respectively; p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in bronchial reactivity, 4 AM FEV1, overnight percentage change in FEV1, or indexes of airway inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol alone improves the number of nocturnal awakenings and supplemental 24-h beta 2-agonist use in nocturnal asthma without significantly altering lung function and airway inflammation.     

Potential masking effects of salmeterol on airway inflammation in asthma

We hypothesized that regular use of long-acting beta-agonists could delay recognition of ("mask") increasing airway inflammation. We studied steroid-sparing and "masking" effects of salmeterol versus placebo in 13 asthmatic individuals requiring >= 1,500 microgram inhaled corticosteroid daily. Corticosteroid doses were reduced weekly until criteria were met for an exacerbation or the corticosteroid was fully withdrawn. Subjects were restabilized on their original dose of inhaled corticosteroid for 4 wk before crossover to the alternative treatment. Subjects maintained symptom and peak expiratory flow (PEF) diaries, and underwent weekly spirometric, methacholine challenge, sputum eosinophil, and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) measurements. Mean corticosteroid dose was reduced by 87% during salmeterol treatment, versus 69% with placebo (p = 0.04). Sputum eosinophils increased before exacerbation despite stable symptoms, FEV1, and PEF. In the week before clinical exacerbation, sputum eosinophil counts were higher in the salmeterol-treatment arm (19.9 +/- 29.8% [mean +/- SD], versus placebo 9.3 +/- 17.6%; p = 0.006). Five subjects showed > 10% sputum eosinophilia before exacerbation during salmeterol treatment, as compared with two receiving placebo. In this model, salmeterol controlled symptoms and lung function until inflammation became significantly more advanced. We conclude that the bronchodilating and symptom-relieving effects of salmeterol can mask increasing inflammation and delay awareness of worsening asthma.     

Dose equivalence and bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol and salbutamol in asthma

BACKGROUND: Salbutamol is the most widely prescribed short acting beta 2 agonist and salmeterol is the first long acting inhaled beta 2 agonist. The dose equivalence of salmeterol and salbutamol is disputed. Estimates of weight-for-weight dose ratio have ranged from 1:2 to 1:16. A study was undertaken to clarify the true dose ratio. METHODS: The bronchoprotection afforded against repeated methacholine challenge by inhaled salmeterol 25 micrograms and 100 micrograms and salbutamol 100 micrograms and 400 micrograms was compared in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial. Subjects were 16 stable asthmatics with a baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 65% predicted, screening concentration provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% (PC20FEV1) of < or = 8mg/ml, and a shift in PC20FEV1 of more than two doubling concentration steps following inhalation of salbutamol 400 micrograms. On five separate occasions subjects underwent methacholine challenge before and 30 and 120 minutes after drug administration. PD20FEV1 was calculated for each challenge. FEV1 at 90 minutes after drug administration was also recorded. RESULTS: Bronchoprotection afforded by salmeterol was increased at 120 minutes compared with 30 minutes and protection by salbutamol was decreased. Protection by both doses of salmeterol was similar to salbutamol 100 micrograms at 30 minutes but significantly greater at 120 minutes. FEV1 at 90 minutes was significantly greater after salmeterol 100 micrograms than after placebo, but there were no other significant differences between treatments. Maximal observed protection was equivalent for salmeterol 100 micrograms and salbutamol 400 micrograms. CONCLUSIONS: The data are compatible with a weight-for-weight dose ratio for salmeterol:salbutamol of < or = 1:4.     

Relationship between serum IgE and airway responsiveness in adults with asthma

BACKGROUND: General population studies have shown a relationship between total serum IgE levels and airway responsiveness, but this association has not been documented in patients with asthma. OBJECTIVE: The study assesses the cross-sectional relationship between IgE levels and airway responsiveness in 208 subjects who had had emergency department treatment for asthma at least 2 years earlier. METHODS: All participants completed a standardized respiratory questionnaire and underwent spirometry, allergy skin testing, and a dose-response methacholine challenge test. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and gender, the percentage of patients with asthma and airway responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [PC20] < or = 8 mg/ml) increased from 52% in the lower quintile of IgE to 72% in the upper quintile (p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, baseline percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and smoking, the association between IgE (both in quintiles and continuous) and PC20 appeared consistent and statistically significant (p < 0.01). This association was stronger in patients who were not given inhaled steroid (odds ratio for twice the concentration of IgE, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 and 1.84), than in patients treated with inhaled steroid (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 and 1.50). Eosinophilia and skin reactivity were associated with PC20 although to a lesser extent. CONCLUSION: These findings strengthen the role played by IgE in facilitating the development of bronchial responsiveness in patients with asthma.     

Effect of short- and long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic patients

Increased concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) occur in patients with asthma, and exhaled NO may be useful for assessing the effect of drug therapy on airway inflammation. Beta2-agonists have been proposed to have both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects. We therefore assessed exhaled NO after beta2-agonists in asthmatic patients. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. Firstly, exhaled NO was measured in 18 asthmatics (9 taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS)) before and after nebulized salbutamol (5 mg), or identical placebo (0.9% saline). Exhaled NO and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured at 15 min intervals for 1 h (Study 1). Secondly, the effect of 1 week of treatment with the long-acting beta2-agonist, salmeterol (50 microg b.i.d.), added to either budesonide (800 microg b.i.d.) or placebo, was studied in eight mild asthmatic subjects (Study 2). Exhaled NO was measured by a chemiluminescence analyser, adapted for on-line recording. In Study 1, exhaled NO showed no significant change at any time-point in patients not taking inhaled GCS. In asthmatics on inhaled GCS, exhaled NO increased compared to placebo at 15 and 30 min, but this did not reach statistical significance. In Study 2, treatment with salmeterol increased FEV1, but exhaled NO levels were not significantly changed, either after budesonide treatment (143+/-35 to 179+/-67 ppb), or after placebo (201+/-68 to 211+/-65 ppb). Our results confirm that single high dose salbutamol does not increase exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics not taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids. Salbutamol may increase exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids. However, regular use of salmeterol resulted in no change in exhaled nitric oxide, either used alone or in combination with inhaled glucocorticosteroids.     

Effects of high dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, 750 micrograms and 1500 micrograms twice daily, and 40 mg per day oral prednisolone on lung function, symptoms, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction

BACKGROUND: The effect of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction is still disputed. Whether any physiological improvements seen are accompanied by changes in bronchial responsiveness and symptoms and quality of life is also still unclear. METHODS: A sequential placebo controlled, blinded parallel group study investigating the effect of three weeks of treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), 750 micrograms or 1500 micrograms twice daily, and oral prednisolone, 40 mg per day, was carried out in 105 patients with severe non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction (mean age 66 years, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.05 litres [40% predicted], geometric mean PD20 0.52 mumol). End points assessed were FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF), bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine, and quality of life as measured by a formal quality of life questionnaire. RESULTS: Both doses of BDP produced equivalent, small, but significant improvements in FEV1 (mean 48 ml), FVC (mean 120 ml), and PEF (mean 12.4 l/min). The addition of oral prednisolone to the treatment regime in two thirds of the patients did not produce any further improvement in these parameters. Inhaled BDP produced a treatment response in individual patients (defined as an improvement in FEV1, FVC, or mean PEF of at least 20% compared with baseline values) more commonly than placebo (34% v 15%). The two doses of BDP were equally effective in this respect and again no further benefit of treatment with oral prednisolone was noted. Treatment with BDP for up to six weeks did not affect bronchial responsiveness to histamine. Small but significant improvements were seen in dyspnoea during daily activities, and the feeling of mastery over the disease. CONCLUSIONS: High dose inhaled BDP is an effective treatment for patients with chronic airflow obstruction not caused by asthma. Both objective and subjective measures show improvement. Unlike asthma, no improvement in bronchial responsiveness was detected after six weeks of treatment.     

Influence of inhaled steroids on recovery from occupational asthma after cessation of exposure: an 18-month double-blind crossover study

Occupational asthma (OA) is a useful model for the study of asthma in humans. The possibility that inhaled corticosteroids, in addition to withdrawal from the workplace, could improve clinical and functional recovery from OA can be hypothesized. We assessed clinical, functional, and behavioral characteristics of 32 subjects (22 male, 10 female), in all but one of whom OA was confirmed by specific inhalation challenges induced by either high- (n=13) or low-molecular-weight (n=19) agents within 3 mo after cessation of exposure. In this randomized, crossover, double-blind study, subjects (paired for baseline PC20 and duration of symptoms after exposure) received either placebo or 1,000 micrograms of inhaled beclomethasone daily for 1 yr, followed by the alternate medication for 6 mo. Various clinical, functional, and behavioral parameters were examined at each 3-mo visit. Significant improvement in clinical (nocturnal symptoms, cough), functional (morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates), and behavioral (quality of life) parameters were detected in the active-treatment period, although the magnitude of the improvement was relatively small. Side effects (oropharyngeal, reduced cortisol) were similar in the placebo and treatment groups. Distinguishing subjects who started with the active preparation from those who were given placebo first showed that most clinical and behavioral parameters improved in the former instance, whereas there was no significant difference in the latter. We conclude that inhaled corticosteroids induce a small but significant overall improvement of the asthmatic condition in subjects with occupational asthma caused by high- and low-molecular-weight agents after withdrawal from exposure. The beneficial effect is, however, more pronounced if inhaled steroids are given early after diagnosis.     

Relaxin activates the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells in culture

The effects of usual or low doses of inhaled corticosteroids on airway mucosal inflammation have not yet been examined. We therefore, compared the effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 336 microg x day(-1) on asthma control outcomes and markers of airway inflammation. Twenty-four adult subjects with mild and moderate asthma were randomized to receive either BDP or placebo for four weeks; then subjects entered a single blind four week placebo run-in period. We found that the BDP group had significantly greater improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), morning peak flow, and rescue salbutamol use than the placebo-treated group. The improvement in FEV1 largely reversed one week after treatment was stopped. The decrease in the median percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum in the BDP group from 3.8% to 3.4% was not significant, but because eosinophils increased from 8.4% to 12.7% in the placebo group, there was a significant difference between treatment groups (p=0.03). There was no significant difference between groups during treatment in the levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase mucin-like glycoprotein, or fibrinogen in induced sputum. The change in FEV1 in the BDP group did not correlate significantly with the change in eosinophil percentage or ECP levels. We concluded that four weeks of treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 336 microg x day(-1) was associated with significant improvements in peak flow, forced expiratory volume in one second, and rescue salbutamol use in asthmatic subjects but was not associated with large reductions in markers of eosinophilic inflammation, bronchovascular permeability, or mucus hypersecretion.     

Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, causes dose-related improvements in chronic asthma. Montelukast Asthma Study Group

The leukotrienes are known to be important mediators of bronchial asthma. The ability of montelukast, a potent and selective CysLT1 leukotriene receptor antagonist, to cause a dose-related improvement in chronic asthma was investigated in a placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study. After a two week placebo run-in period, chronic asthmatic patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 40-80% predicted with > or = 15% increase (absolute value) after beta2-agonist were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups (placebo or montelukast 2, 10, or 50 mg once daily in the evening) for a three week, double-blind treatment period. For patient-reported end-points (daytime symptom score, use of as needed inhaled beta2 agonist, asthma-specific quality of life) and frequency of asthma exacerbations, montelukast 10 and 50 mg caused similar responses, superior to 2 mg and significantly (p<0.05; linear trend test) different from placebo. All three doses caused improvements in FEV1 and morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) that were significantly (p<0.05) different from placebo. Differences (least square mean) between the pooled 10 and 50 mg montelukast treatment groups and placebo were: 7.1% change from baseline in FEV1, 19.23 L x min(-1) in morning PEFR, -0.29 in daytime asthma symptom score (absolute value), and -0.82 in beta2-agonist use (puff x day(-1)). The incidence of adverse experiences was neither dose-related nor different between montelukast and placebo treatments. We conclude that montelukast causes a dose-related improvement in patient-reported asthma end-points over the range 2-50 mg. Montelukast causes benefit to chronic asthmatic patients by improving asthma control end-points.     

The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of non asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction

AIMS: The aims of this investigation were to evaluate the efficacy of regular inhaled beclomethasone in the control of symptoms and lung function with non-asthmatic smoking related obstructive pulmonary disease and to evaluate the relationship between clinical responses to a short course of oral prednisone and longer term outcomes using inhaled steroid. METHODS: The study was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover investigation in 18 patients. The active treatment was inhaled beclomethasone 1000 micrograms given twice daily for three months by metered dose inhaler. At the end of each treatment period, patients received oral prednisone 30 mg/day for ten days. The two treatment phases were separated by a one month washout interval. Peak flow rates, symptom scores and "rescue" bronchodilator use were recorded twice daily. Lung function (FEV1, FVC and lung volumes) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 methacholine) were measured at monthly visits. The number of exacerbations requiring intervention therapy were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no consistent benefits attributable to beclomethasone. Lung function was not significantly better as a result of active treatment. Sputum production improved but other symptom scores were similar during active and placebo therapy. Three patients exhibited an increase in FEV1 of 15% or more during active treatment but did not do so when oral prednisone was administered immediately after the period of placebo treatment. A further three patients showed an improvement in FEV1 of 15% or more with oral prednisone but failed to improve during treatment with inhaled beclomethasone. The predictive value of the "trial of steroid" was 0% and 81.3% for positive and negative outcomes respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that in non-asthmatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease inhaled corticosteroid fails to achieve significant improvements in either lung function or symptoms. The response to a "trial of steroid" using oral prednisone is not clinically helpful in selecting the small number of patients who may subsequently benefit from this form of therapy.     

Effects of formoterol, salmeterol or oxitropium bromide on airway responses to salbutamol in COPD

We examined whether a pretreatment with formoterol, oxitropium bromide, or salmeterol might modify the dose-response curves to inhaled salbutamol in patients with stable and partially reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Sixteen outpatients with partially reversible, stable COPD received 24 microg formoterol, 50 microg salmeterol, 200 microg oxitropium bromide, or placebo on four non-consecutive days. Spirometric testing was performed immediately before inhalation of treatment and after 2 h. A dose-response curve to inhaled salbutamol was then constructed using doses of 100, 100, 200 microg and 400 microg--that is, a total cumulative dose of 800 microg. Dose increments were given at 20 min intervals with measurements being made 15 min after each dose. Formoterol, salmeterol, or oxitropium bromide elicited a significant increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) compared with placebo (mean differences (L) = placebo 0.05; formoterol 0.34; salmeterol 0.27; oxitropium bromide 0.23). Dose-dependent increases in FEV1 were seen (mean values (L) before salbutamol and after a cumulative dose of 100, 200, 400, and 800 microg = placebo: 1.06, 1.28, 1.35, 1.39, 1.41; formoterol: 1.33, 1.37, 1.41, 1.44, 1.44; salmeterol: 1.30, 1.33, 1.36, 1.39, 1.42; oxitropium bromide: 1.27, 1.34, 1.37, 1.41, 1.40). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) responses to salbutamol after therapy with formoterol, salmeterol, or oxitropium bromide compared with placebo. This study clearly shows that a pretreatment with a conventional dose of formoterol, salmeterol, or oxitropium bromide does not preclude the possibility of inducing a further bronchodilation with salbutamol in patients suffering from partially reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.