Pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows subjected to 2 different intervals from presynchronization to initiation of Ovsynch protocol

A protocol for presynchronization of ovarian status with 2 injections of PGF_2α given 14 d apart, with the last PGF_2α injection given 12 or 14 d before Ovsynch increases pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) in dairy cows. We determined the efficacy of reducing the interval from the last PGF_2α injection (500 μg of cloprostenol) of presynchronization to initiation of Ovsynch on response to treatment and P/AI. Lactating dairy cows were assigned to an Ovsynch protocol, with the initial injection of GnRH given either 9 (PRE-9; n = 135) or 12 d (PRE-12; n = 135) after the second PGF_2α injection of presynchronization. The Ovsynch protocol consisted of 2 injections of 100 μg of GnRH given 9 d apart and 1 injection of PGF_2α given 7 d after the initial GnRH injection, and cows were subjected to timed artificial insemination (TAI; 70 ± 3.5 DIM) approximately 16 h after the second GnRH injection. Body condition score (1–5 scale) was recorded at TAI. Blood samples were taken for progesterone determination at the PGF_2α injection of Ovsynch, at TAI, and at 11 d after TAI. Ultrasonographic examinations were done in all cows at the second PGF_2α injection of presynchronization, initial GnRH injection, PGF_2α injection of Ovsynch, at TAI, and 24 h after TAI for cyclicity status and ovarian responses to treatments, and at 32 and 60 d after TAI for confirmation of pregnancy. Overall, 29 cows (10.7%) were determined acyclic or cystic and excluded from the study. The percentage of cows responding to initial GnRH injection (62.2 vs. 61.5%) did not differ between PRE-9 and PRE-12 but more cows in the PRE-9 group failed to respond to PGF_2α treatment of Ovsynch compared with PRE-12 (22.7 vs. 10.7%). Body condition score at TAI (2.9 ± 0.02) and mean ovulatory follicle diameter (16.4 ± 0.2 mm) were not different between treatments. Overall P/AI at 32 d was reduced in PRE-9 (33.6%) compared with PRE-12 (44.3%) but pregnancy losses (5.0 vs. 3.7%) did not differ between treatments. Primiparous cows in the PRE-12 group had higher mean progesterone concentration 11 d after TAI and greater P/AI 32 after TAI than primiparous cows in the PRE-9 group (6.4 ± 0.5 vs. 4.6 ± 0.5 ng/mL and 55.8 vs. 30.0%, respectively). In conclusion, reducing the interval from the last PGF_2α injection of the presynchronization treatment to initiation of Ovsynch (from 12 to 9 d) did not affect ovulatory response to initial GnRH injection but reduced response to PGF_2α injection of Ovsynch and P/AI at 32 and 60 d after TAI. The reduction in P/AI was particularly evident in primiparous cows of the PRE-9 group.     

Pregnancy rates in lactating dairy cows after presynchronization of estrous cycles and variations of the Ovsynch protocol

Our objectives were to determine pregnancy rates after altering times of the second GnRH injection, insemination, or both in a combined Presynch + Ovsynch protocol, to accommodate once-daily lockup of dairy cows. Lactating dairy cows (n = 665) from 2 dairy herds in northeastern Kansas were studied. Cows ranged from 24 to 44 d in milk (DIM) at the start of the Pre-synch protocol, which consisted of 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) 14 d apart, with the second injection given 12 d before initiating the Ovsynch protocol. Cows were blocked by lactation number and assigned randomly to 3 treatments consisting of variations of the Ovsynch protocol. Cows in 2 treatments received injections of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h (G48) after the PGF(2alpha) injection. Timed AI (TAI) was conducted at the time of the second GnRH injection (G48 + TAI48) or 24 h later (G48 + TAI72). Cows in the third treatment received the injections of GnRH 7 d before and at 72 h after PGF(2alpha) and were inseminated at the time of the second GnRH injection (G72 + TAI72). Pregnancy was diagnosed weekly by palpation per rectum of uterine contents on d 40 or 41 after TAI. Pregnancy rates differed between herds, but they were consistently greater for G72 + TAI72 than for G48 + TAI48 and G72 + TAI72. Subsequent calving rates were consistent with differences in initial TAI pregnancy rates. Pregnancy loss was least for cows on the G72 + TAI72 treatment. Body condition scores (BCS) ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 when assessed on Monday of the breeding week. An interaction of BCS and herd was detected in which cows in herd 1 having poorer BCS (<2.25) had greater pregnancy rates than cows of greater BCS (>/=2.25), whereas the reverse was true in herd 2 in which overall pregnancy rates were greater. We concluded that inseminating at 48 or 72 h after PGF(2alpha), when GnRH was administered at 48 h after PGF(2alpha), produced fewer pregnancies than inseminating and injecting GnRH at 72 h after PGF(2alpha) for cows whose estrous cycles were synchronized before initiating this variant of the Ovsynch protocol.     

Treatment of cycling and noncycling lactating dairy cows with progesterone during Ovsynch

Our objective was to determine whether progesterone (P4) supplementation during an Ovsynch protocol would enhance fertility in lactating dairy cows. Lactating dairy cows (n = 634) at 6 locations were assigned randomly within lactation number and stage of lactation to receive the Ovsynch protocol [OVS; synchronization of ovulation by injecting GnRH 7 d before and 48 h after PGF_2α, followed by one fixed-time AI (TAI) 16 to 20 h after the second GnRH injection] or Ovsynch plus a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) P4-releasing insert for 7 d, beginning at the first GnRH injection (OVS + CIDR). Blood was sampled to quantify P4 10 d before the first GnRH injection, immediately before the first GnRH injection, at the time of CIDR removal, before the PGF_2α injection (1 to 2 h after CIDR insert removal), and 48 h after the PGF_2α injection to determine cyclicity status before initiation of treatment, luteal status at the PGF_2α injection, and incidence of luteal regression. Overall, conception rates at 28 (40 vs. 50%) and 56 d (33 vs. 38%) after TAI differed between OVS and OVS + CIDR, respectively; but a treatment × location interaction was detected. Compared with OVS, pregnancy outcomes were more positive for OVS + CIDR cows at 4 of 6 locations 28 d after TAI and at 3 of 6 locations 56 d after TAI. An interaction of luteal status (high vs. low) before CIDR insert removal and PGF_2α injection with pretreatment cycling status indicated that cows having low P4 at PGF_2α injection benefited most from P4 supplementation (OVS + CIDR = 36% vs. OVS = 18%), regardless of pretreatment cycling status. Pregnancy loss between 28 and 56 d after TAI was greater for noncycling cows (31%) compared with cycling cows (16%). Pregnancy loss for cows receiving P4 (21%) did not differ from that for cows not receiving P4 (21%). Supplementation of P4, pretreatment cycling status, and luteal status before PGF_2α injection altered follicular diameters at the time of the second GnRH injection, but were unrelated to pregnancy outcomes. Incidence of multiple ovulation was greater in noncycling than in cycling cows. Further, cows having multiple ovulations had improved pregnancy outcomes at 28 and 56 d after TAI. In summary, a CIDR insert during the Ovsynch protocol increased fertility in lactating cows having low serum P4 before PGF_2α injection. Improved pregnancy outcomes were observed at some, but not all locations.     

Presynchronization using a modified Ovsynch protocol or a single gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection 7 d before an Ovsynch-56 protocol for submission of lactating dairy cows to first timed artificial insemination

Presynchronization strategies, such as Presynch-Ovsynch and Double-Ovsynch, increase fertility to timed artificial insemination (TAI) compared with Ovsynch alone; however, simpler presynchronization strategies could reduce costs and simplify reproductive management. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 601) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 presynchronization treatments before beginning an Ovsynch-56 protocol (GnRH at 70 ± 3 DIM, PGF_2α 7 d later, GnRH 56 h after PGF_2α, and TAI 16 h later at 80 ± 3 DIM) for first TAI. Cows (n = 306) in the first treatment (Double-Ovsynch; DO) were presynchronized using a modified Ovsynch protocol (GnRH at 53 ± 3 DIM, 7 d later PGF_2α, and GnRH 3 d later) ending 7 d before the first GnRH injection (G1) of an Ovsynch-56 protocol. Cows (n = 295) in the second treatment (GGPG) were presynchronized using a single injection of GnRH 7 d before G1 of an Ovsynch-56 protocol at 63 ± 3 DIM. Blood samples were collected at G1 and the PGF_2α injections of the Ovsynch-56 protocol to determine progesterone (P4) concentrations. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed using ultrasonography 32 d after TAI, and pregnant cows were reexamined 46 and 70 d after TAI. Overall, DO cows had more pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) compared with GGPG cows 32 d after TAI (53 vs. 43%). Overall, P/AI did not differ by parity (primiparous vs. multiparous), and pregnancy loss did not differ between treatments or parities. More DO cows had P4 in a medium range (>0.5 to <4 ng/mL) at G1 of the Ovsynch-56 protocol compared with GGPG cows (82 vs. 50%), and more DO cows had high P4 (>4 ng/mL) at the PGF_2α injection of the Ovsynch-56 protocol compared with GGPG cows (67 vs. 36%). Thus, presynchronization with a modified Ovsynch protocol increased P/AI after TAI at first AI by increasing synchrony to the Ovsynch-56 protocol compared with presynchronization using a single injection of GnRH.     

Short communication: presynchronization using a single injection of PGF2alpha before synchronized ovulation and first timed artificial insemination in dairy cows

Conception to synchronized ovulation (Ovsynch) using injections of GnRH and PGF2alpha and timed artificial insemination has been shown to be maximized when the program is initiated 5 to 12 d after estrus. The objective of this double-blinded field trial was to assess the effect of one injection of PGF2alpha, 10 d before the Ovsynch program, on the probability of pregnancy at first insemination in lactating dairy cows. The hypothesis was that cows that underwent luteolysis in response to PGF2alpha would be between 5 and 8 d postestrus at the start of Ovsynch. In five commercial dairy herds in Ontario, Canada, at 52 +/- 12 d in milk, 506 cows were assigned at random to receive either one i.m. injection of 500 microg of cloprostenol or saline. Ten days later, all cows received 100 microg of GnRH i.m., followed in 7 d by 500 microg of cloprostenol i.m. and 100 microg of GnRH i.m. 48 h later. All cows were artificially inseminated 0 to 20 h after the second injection of GnRH, without regard to detection of estrus. Pregnancy was diagnosed by transrectal palpation at least 35 d after insemination. The probability of pregnancy after first insemination was modeled with logistic regression, accounting for the correlation of cows with herd and the effect of season of calving. There was no difference in pregnancy risk between cows that received PGF2alpha presynchronization and controls (37.3 and 36.6%, respectively; odds ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.20). Parity and days in milk at insemination were not significant covariates.     

Presynchronization with Double-Ovsynch improves fertility at first postpartum artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows

The objective of this study was to compare circulating progesterone (P4) profiles and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows bred by timed artificial insemination (TAI) following Ovsynch-56 after 2 different presynchronization protocols: Double-Ovsynch (DO) or Presynch-Ovsynch (PS). Our main hypothesis was that DO would increase fertility in primiparous cows, but not in multiparous cows. Within each herd (n = 3), lactating dairy cows (n = 1,687; 778 primiparous, 909 multiparous) were randomly assigned to DO [n = 837; GnRH-7d-PGF_2α-3d-GnRH-7d-Ovsynch-56 (GnRH-7d-PGF_2α-56h-GnRH-16hTAI)] or PS (n = 850; PGF_2α-14d-PGF_2α-12d-Ovsynch-56). In 1 herd, concentrations of P4 were determined at the first GnRH (GnRH1) of Ovsynch-56 and at d 11 after TAI (n = 739). In all herds, pregnancy was diagnosed by palpation per rectum at 39 d. In 1 herd, the incidence of late embryo loss was determined at 74 d, and data were available on P/AI at the subsequent second service. Presynchronization with DO reduced the percentage of animals with low P4 concentrations (<0.50 ng/mL) at GnRH1 of Ovsynch-56 (5.4 vs. 25.3%, DO vs. PS). A lesser percentage of both primiparous and multiparous cows treated with DO had low P4 concentrations at GnRH1 of Ovsynch-56 (3.3 vs. 19.7%, DO vs. PS primiparous; and 8.8 vs. 31.9%, DO vs. PS multiparous). Presynchronization with DO improved P/AI at the first postpartum service (46.3 vs. 38.2%, DO vs. PS). Statistically, a fertility improvement could be detected for primiparous cows treated with DO (52.5 vs. 42.3%, DO vs. PS, primiparous), but only a tendency could be detected in multiparous cows (40.3 vs. 34.3%, DO vs. PS, multiparous), consistent with our original hypothesis. Presynchronization treatment had no effect on the incidence of late embryo loss after first service (8.5 vs. 5.5%, DO vs. PS). A lower body condition score increased the percentage of cows with low P4 at GnRH1 of Ovsynch-56 and reduced fertility to the TAI. In addition, P4 concentration at d 11 after TAI was reduced by DO. The method of presynchronization at first service had no effect on P/AI at the subsequent second service (34.7 vs. 36.5%, DO vs. PS). Thus, presynchronization with DO induced cyclicity in most anovular cows and improved fertility compared with PS, suggesting that DO could be a useful reproductive management protocol for synchronizing first service in commercial dairy herds.     

Pregnancy in dairy cows after synchronized ovulation regimens with or without presynchronization and progesterone

Two experiments examined pregnancy after synchronized ovulation (Ovsynch) with or without progesterone (P4) administered via controlled internal drug release (CIDR) intravaginal inserts. In experiment 1, 262 lactating cows in one herd were in 3 treatments: Ovsynch (n = 91), Ovsynch + CIDR (n = 91), and control (n = 80). The Ovsynch protocol included injections of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h after an injection of PGF20. Timed artificial insemination (TAI; 57 to 77 d postpartum) was 16 to 20 h after the second GnRH injection. Cows in the Ovsynch + CIDR group also received a CIDR (1.9 g of P4) insert for 7 d starting at first GnRH injection. Control cows received A-I when estrus was detected using an electronic estrus detection system. Based on serum P4, 44.1% of cows were cyclic before Ovsynch. Pregnancy rates at 29 d (59.3 vs. 36.3%) and 57 d (45.1 vs. 19.8%) after TAI and embryo survival (75.9 vs. 54.5%) from 29 to 57 d were greater for Ovsynch + CIDR than for Ovsynch alone. In experiment 2, 630 cows in 2 herds received TAI at 59 to 79 d postpartum after 6 treatments. Estrous cycles were either presynchronized (2 injections of PGF2alpha 14 d apart; n = 318) or not presynchronized (n = 312). Within those groups, Ovsynch was initiated 12 d after second presynchronization PGF2alpha, and used alone (n = 318) or with CIDR inserts for 7 d (1.38 g of P4/insert, n = 124 or 1.9 g of P4/insert, n = 188). Before Ovsynch, 80% of cows were cyclic. Presynchronization increased pregnancy (46.8 vs. 37.5%) at 29 d after TAI, but CIDR inserts had no effect on pregnancy in experiment 2. Overall embryonic survival between 29 and 57 d in experiment 2 was 57.7%. Use of CIDR inserts with Ovsynch improved conception and embryo survival in experiment 1 but not in experiment 2, in part due to differing proportions of cyclic cows at the outset. Presynchronization before Ovsynch enhanced pregnancy rate.     

Reproduction in dairy cows following progesterone insert presynchronization and resynchronization protocols

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of an intravaginal insert containing progesterone (CIDR, controlled internal drug releasing) administered in presynchronization and resynchronization protocols on cyclicity, detection of estrus, pregnancy rate, and pregnancy loss to first AI; reinsemination patterns; and pregnancy rates to second postpartum AI before and after the time of first-service pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cows. Holstein cows (n = 1,052) were blocked by parity and BCS at 3 ± 3 d in milk (study d 0 = day of calving) and assigned randomly to 1 of 3 presynchronization treatments. During the presynchronization programs, all cows received 2 injections of PGF_2α, on study d 35 and 49. Cows enrolled in the control presynchronization treatment received AI after detected estrus from study d 49 to 62. Cows enrolled in the CIDR estrus-detection (CED) presynchronization treatment received a CIDR insert from study d 42 to 49 and AI on detection of estrus from d 49 to 62. Cows enrolled in the CIDR timed AI (CTAI) presynchronization treatment received the same treatment as CED, but were subjected to timed AI on study d 72 after the Ovsynch (GnRH, 7 d PGF_2α, 2 d GnRH, 24 h timed AI) protocol. The control and CED cows not inseminated by study d 62 were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol on the same day and received timed AI on study d 72. After first AI, cows were assigned to no resynchronization (RCON) or resynchronization with a CIDR insert (RCIDR) between 14 and 21 d after AI. Blood samples collected on study d 35, 49, and 62 were analyzed for concentrations of progesterone and cows were classified as anestrous when progesterone was <1.0 ng/mL in the first 2 samples. On study d 62, anestrous cows with progesterone ≥ 1.0 ng/mL were classified as having resumed cyclicity. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 31 and 60 d after first AI and at 42 d after second AI. A greater proportion of anestrous cows in CED and CTAI became cyclic by d 62 postpartum than control cows. Resynchronization with the CIDR insert increased the pregnancy rate at 31 d after first AI in CED and CTAI, and at 60 d after AI in all cows because of reduced pregnancy loss. These results indicate that presynchronization with the CIDR insert increased induction of cyclicity in anestrous cows and that resynchronization with the CIDR insert did not affect the reinsemination rate but did reduce pregnancy loss and increased the pregnancy rate at 60 d after first AI.     

Supplementation with estradiol-17beta before the last gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection of the Ovsynch protocol in lactating dairy cows

The aim of this study was to determine whether an increase in circulating estrogen concentrations would increase percentage pregnant per artificial insemination (PP/AI) in a timed AI protocol in high-producing lactating dairy cows. We analyzed only cows having a synchronized ovulation to the last GnRH of the Ovsynch protocol (867/1,084). The control group (n = 420) received Ovsynch (GnRH - 7 d - PGF_2α - 56 h - GnRH - 16 h - timed AI). The treatment group (n = 447) had the same timed AI protocol with the addition of 1 mg of estradiol-17β (E2) at 8 h before the second GnRH injection. Ovarian ultrasound and blood samples were taken just before E2 treatment of both groups. In a subset of cows (n = 563), pressure-activated estrus detection devices were used to assess expression of estrus at 48 to 72 h after PGF_2α treatment. Ovulation was confirmed by ultrasound 7 d after timed AI. Treatment with E2 increased expression of estrus but overall PP/AI did not differ between E2 and control cows. There was an interaction between treatment and expression of estrus such that PP/AI was greater in E2-treated cows that showed estrus than in E2-treated or control cows that did not show estrus and tended to be greater than control cows that showed estrus. There was evidence for a treatment by ovulatory follicle size interaction on PP/AI. Supplementation with E2 improved PP/AI in cows ovulating medium (15 to 19 mm) but not smaller or larger follicles. The E2 treatment also tended to improve PP/AI in primiparous cows with low (≤2.5) body condition score, and in cows at first postpartum service compared with Ovsynch alone. In conclusion, any improvements in PP/AI because of E2 treatment during a timed AI protocol appear to depend on expression of estrus, parity, body condition score, and size of ovulatory follicle.     

Reproductive performance of grazing dairy cows following presynchronization and resynchronization protocols

Objectives were to compare the effect of presynchronization and resynchronization methods on fertility responses of grazing dairy cows at first and second artificial insemination (AI) and pregnancy rate during the entire breeding season. Lactating dairy cows (n = 1,263) in 2 seasonal grazing farms were blocked, within farm, by parity, breed and days in milk. Within each block, cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments arranged as a 2 × 2 factorial with 2 presynchronization and 2 resynchronization treatments. Cows had their estrous cycles presynchronized with either a PGF_2α-based program (Presynch) consisting of 2 injections of PGF_2α administered 14 d apart and starting the timed AI protocol 11 d later, or with a PGF_2α-GnRH-based presynchronization program (G6G) consisting of an injection of PGF_2α, followed 3 d later by an injection of GnRH and starting the timed AI protocol 6 d later. All cows received the first insemination on the same day, which was considered study d 0 and also d 0 of the breeding season. All cows received the 5-d timed AI protocol that consisted of GnRH on d −8, PGF_2α on d −3 and −2, and GnRH + timed AI on d 0. Blood was sampled and analyzed for progesterone on d −8. On d 12, cows in each presynchronization treatment either remained as untreated controls (RCON) or received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone for 7 d (RCIDR). Estrus was observed daily starting on d 19 and cows in estrus were inseminated on the same day. On d 35, bulls were placed with the cows for an additional 65 d, completing a 100-d breeding season. Holstein cows were less likely to have progesterone ≥1 ng/mL on d −8, and had less expression of estrus and pregnancy per AI (P/AI), which resulted in a slower rate of pregnancy and a smaller proportion of pregnancy at the end of the study than did Jersey or crossbred cows. In addition, body condition, days in milk, and plasma progesterone concentration at the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol had marked effects on the reproductive performance of lactating grazing dairy cows. A greater proportion of G6G cows had progesterone ≥1ng/mL at the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol compared with Presynch cows (82.0 vs. 74.3%). Presynchronization treatment did not influence P/AI, but cows in G6G had increased risk of pregnancy loss between d 30 and 65 after the first AI (12.9 vs. 8.1%). Nevertheless, an interaction between presynchronization and ovarian status was observed, and cows initiating the timed AI with progesterone ≥1 ng/mL had greater P/AI when previously treated with Presynch than G6G. On the other hand, G6G benefited P/AI of cows initiating the timed AI with progesterone <1 ng/mL. Resynchronization with RCIDR altered the pattern of return to estrus, but it did not increase the rate of re-insemination and decreased the proportion of pregnant cows at the end of the 100-d breeding period (80.6 vs. 84.4%).     

A modified presynchronization protocol improves fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows

To compare 2 hormonal protocols for submission of lactating dairy cows for timed artificial insemination (TAI), nonpregnant lactating Holstein cows (n = 269) >60 d in milk were randomly assigned to each of 2 treatments to receive TAI (TAI = d 0). Cows assigned to the first treatment (Ovsynch, n = 134) received 50 microg of GnRH (d -10), 25 mg of PGF2alpha (d -3), and 50 microg of GnRH (d -1) beginning at a random stage of the estrous cycle. Cows assigned to the second treatment (Presynch, n = 135) received Ovsynch but with the addition of 2 PGF2alpha (25 mg) injections administered 14 d apart beginning 28 d (d -38 and -24) before initiation of Ovsynch. All cows received TAI 16 to 18 h after the second GnRH injection. Ovulatory response after each GnRH injection for a subset of cows (n = 109) and pregnancy status 42 d after TAI for all cows were assessed using transrectal ultrasonography. Based on serum progesterone (P4) profiles determined for a subset of cows (n = 109), P4 concentrations decreased for Presynch cows after the first 2 PGF2alpha injections, and Presynch cows had greater P4 concentrations at the PGF2alpha injection on d -3 compared with Ovsynch cows. Although the proportion of cows ovulating after the first and second GnRH injections did not differ statistically between treatments (41.1 and 69.6% vs. 35.9 and 81.1% for Ovsynch vs. Presynch, respectively), pregnancy rate per artificial insemination (PR/AI) at 42 d post TAI was greater for Presynch than for Ovsynch cows (49.6 vs. 37.3%). Parity, DIM, and body condition score (BCS) at TAI did not affect PR/AI to TAI. These data support use of this presynchronization protocol to increase PR/ AI of lactating dairy cows receiving TAI compared with Ovsynch.     

Altering the time of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection and artificial insemination (AI) during Ovsynch affects pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows

Based on previous research, we hypothesized that Cosynch at 72 h [GnRH−7 d−PGF_2α;−72 h−GnRH + artificial insemination (AI)] would result in a greater number of pregnancies per AI (P/AI) than Cosynch at 48 h. Further, we hypothesized that P/AI would be improved to a greater extent when GnRH was administered at 56 h after PGF_2α; before AI at 72 h due to a more optimal interval between the LH surge and AI. Nine hundred twenty-seven lactating dairy cows (n = 1,507 AI) were blocked by pen, and pens rotated through treatments. All cows received GnRH followed 7 d later by PGF_2α; and then received one of the following: 1) GnRH + timed AI 48 h after PGF_2α; (Cosynch-48); 2) GnRH 56 h after PGF_2α; + timed AI 72 h after PGF_2α; (Ovsynch-56); or 3) GnRH + timed AI 72 h after PGF_2α; (Cosynch-72). Pregnancy diagnoses were performed by ultrasound at 31 to 33 d post-AI and again at 52 to 54 d post-AI. Overall P/AI were similar for the Cosynch-48 (29.2%) and Cosynch-72 (25.4%) groups. The Ovsynch-56 group had a greater P/AI (38.6%) than Cosynch-48 or Cosynch-72. Presynchronized first-service animals had greater P/AI than cows at later services in Cosynch-48 (36.2 vs. 23.0%) and Ovsynch-56 (44.8 vs. 32.7%) but not in Cosynch-72 (24.6 vs. 26.2%). Similarly, primiparous cows had greater P/AI than multiparous cows in Cosynch-48 (34.1 vs. 22.9%) and Ovsynch-56 (41.3 vs. 32.6%), but not Cosynch-72 (29.8 vs. 25.3%). In conclusion, we found no advantage to Cosynch at 72 h vs. 48 h. In contrast, we found a clear advantage to treating with GnRH at 56 h, 16 h before a 72 h AI, probably because of more-optimal timing of AI before ovulation.     

Optimizing ovulation to first GnRH improved outcomes to each hormonal injection of ovsynch in lactating dairy cows

Ovulatory response to the first GnRH of Ovsynch is the critical determinant for successful synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows. Our objective in this study was to develop a pre-Ovsynch treatment that increased the percentage of cows that ovulated in response to the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch. To accomplish our goal, we evaluated a hormonal strategy that consisted of PGF_2α and GnRH before the first GnRH of Ovsynch. Lactating dairy cows (n = 137) were assigned to receive either no treatment before Ovsynch (control) or 25 mg of PGF_2α (PreP) followed 2 d later by 100 μg of GnRH (PreG), administered 4 (G4G), 5 (G5G), or 6 (G6G) d before initiating the Ovsynch protocol. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed to assess follicular size and resulting ovulation, and blood samples were collected to measure circulating concentrations of progesterone and estradiol immediately before each hormonal injection. Cows were inseminated at a fixed time 16 h after final GnRH of Ovsynch. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 35 d later by palpation per rectum of uterine contents. Proportion of cows that ovulated to first GnRH of Ovsynch was 56.0, 66.7, 84.6, and 53.8% for G4G, G5G, G6G, and controls, respectively, and was greater for G6G than for control cows. Luteolytic response to PGF_2α of Ovsynch was greater in all treated than control cows (92.0, 91.7, 96.2, and 69.2% for G4G, G5G, G6G, and control, respectively). Synchronization rate to Ovsynch was greater (92 vs. 69%, respectively) in G6G than in control cows. In addition, cows that ovulated in response to first GnRH of Ovsynch had greater response to PGF_2α of Ovsynch (92.7 vs. 77.1%, respectively) and greater synchronization rate to the overall protocol (87.9 vs. 62.9%, respectively) than those that did not ovulate. Concentrations of progesterone at PGF_2α of Ovsynch, and estradiol and follicle size at final GnRH of Ovsynch, were identified as significant predictors of probability of pregnancy 35 d after artificial insemination. In summary, a PGF_2α-and-GnRH based pre-Ovsynch strategy consisting of a 6-d interval between PreG and first GnRH of Ovsynch resulted in a greater ovulatory and luteolytic response to first GnRH and PGF_2α of Ovsynch, respectively, compared with control cows. This, in turn, optimized synchronization rate to Ovsynch.     

Effects of method of presynchronization and source of selenium on uterine health and reproduction in dairy cows

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of method of presynchronization and source of supplemental Se on uterine health and reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows (n = 512) were assigned randomly to 2 methods of presynchronization, Presynch (2 PGF_2a given 14 d apart) or CIDR-PS (controlled internal drug releasing inserted for 7 d with an injection of PGF_2a at removal) and 2 sources of Se, sodium selenite (SS) or selenized yeast (SY) supplemented at 0.3 mg/kg from 25 d before calving to 80 d in milk (DIM) arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial. Cows were inseminated following the Ovsynch protocol (d 0 GnRH, d 7 PGF_2a, d 9 GnRH, timed artificial insemination (AI) 12 h after the final GnRH) starting at 12 and 3 d after Presynch and CIDR-PS, respectively. Cows were diagnosed for pregnancy at 28, 42, and 56 d after AI. Source of Se did not influence uterine health and resumption of cyclicity, but fewer CIDR-PS than Presynch cows were cyclic at the beginning of the Ovsynch, although differences in the proportion cyclic may have been caused by the timing when corpus luteum evaluations were performed in the different pre-synchronization treatments. Ovulatory responses were not influenced by source of Se. However, the CIDR-PS increased ovulation to the first GnRH, double ovulation to the final GnRH, and size of ovulatory follicle at PGF_2a and final GnRH of the Ovsynch, but did not influence ovulation at the final GnRH of the Ovsynch. Concentrations of estradiol during the Ovsynch increased with follicle diameter and were greater for cows receiving CIDR-PS than Presynch, but they were not influenced by source of Se. Pregnancy per AI on d 28 (32.7%), 42 (28.5%), and 56 (25.9%) after AI, and pregnancy loss (20.5%) from 28 to 56 d were not influenced by source of Se or method of presynchronization. Although cows receiving CIDR-PS had an increased incidence of ovulation to the first GnRH (73.2 vs. 57.8%) and double ovulation to the final GnRH of the Ovsynch (18.7 vs. 9.0%), both of which enhanced pregnancy, the CIDR-PS protocol did not improve pregnancy per AI or reduce pregnancy loss compared with presynchronization with PGF_2a alone.     

Estrus synchronization of lactating dairy cows with GnRH, progesterone, and prostaglandin F2 alpha

The reproductive performance of synchronized cows was compared with that of nonsynchronized cows. In trial 1, cyclic cows in five seasonal herds were randomly divided into two groups. Cows in one group (n = 515) were treated with a GnRH agonist and an intravaginal progesterone device, followed in 7 d by a PGF2 alpha injection, and the device was removed 1 d after PGF2 alpha. Cows in the other group (n = 512) did not receive any treatment and acted as control. In trial 2, the treatments were similar to those used in trial 1 except that the progesterone device was removed at the time of PGF2 alpha injection (synchronized: n = 516; control: n = 512). The estrus synchronization rate was 92.8% in trial 1 and 92.2% in trial 2. Conception rate to first artificial insemination (AI) was lower for synchronized cows than for control cows in trial 1 (56.5 vs. 62.7%), but similar in trial 2 (64.6 vs. 63.3%). Across both trials, the pregnancy rate during the AI breeding period was greater for the synchronized cows (85.6%) than for the control cows (81.2%). The synchronization treatment reduced the interval from start of the breeding season to conception for cows conceiving by AI (8.9 vs. 14.8 d) or by AI or natural mating (14.1 vs. 21.6 d). The synchronization protocol used in trial 2 achieved better conception rate than that used in trial 1, but the precision of estrus was less in trial 2 than in trial 1.     

Reducing the interval from presynchronization to initiation of timed artificial insemination improves fertility in dairy cows

The objective was to determine if reducing the interval from presynchronization to the first GnRH injection (G1) of a timed artificial insemination (AI) protocol improves pregnancy per AI. One thousand two hundred fourteen Holstein cows, at 37 ± 3 d in milk (DIM), were stratified by parity, DIM, and milk yield in the first month postpartum and randomly assigned to control (n = 412), 2 injections of PGF_2α at 37 ± 3 and 51 ± 3 DIM, then enrolled in a timed AI protocol 14 d later; PShort (n = 410), 2 injections of PGF2_α at 40 ± 3 and 54 ± 3 DIM, then enrolled in a timed AI protocol 11 d later; or PShortG (n = 392), same as PShort, but with an injection of GnRH 7 d before G1. All cows received the same timed AI protocol (d 65, G1; d 72, PGF_2α; d 73, 1 mg of estradiol cypionate; d 75, AI). A subset of 1,000 cows had their ovaries examined by ultrasonography at G1 and 7 d later when PGF_2α of the timed AI was given to determine presence of corpus luteum (CL) and ovulation to G1. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 38 after timed AI, and pregnant cows were reevaluated for pregnancy 4 wk later. Altering the interval between presynchronization and G1 did not affect the proportion of cows with a CL at G1, but GnRH 7 d before G1 increased the proportion of cows with a CL. Ovulation to G1 was greater for 11 compared with the 14 d interval, but GnRH did not improve ovulation. The increased ovulation to G1 when the interval was reduced from 14 to 11 d was observed only in cows with a CL at G1, but treatment did not affect ovulation in cows without a CL at G1. Treatment affected the pregnancy per AI on d 38 and 66 after insemination, and they were greater for the 11 compared with 14-d interval, but addition of GnRH did not improve pregnancy per AI. Cows ovulating to G1 had greater pregnancy per AI regardless of whether or not they had a CL at G1. Reducing the interval from presynchronization to initiation of the timed AI protocol from 14 to 11 d increased ovulation to G1 and pregnancy per AI in lactating dairy cows.     

Fertility of lactating dairy cows administered recombinant bovine somatotropin during heat stress

Administration of recombinant bovine somatotropin (bST) to lactating dairy cows during heat stress increases milk yield, but it also can increase body temperature and may therefore compromise fertility. However, it is possible that bST treatment could increase fertility during heat stress because it has been reported to increase fertility in lactating cows. In addition, bST increases secretion of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) that promotes embryo survival. The purpose of this study was to determine effects of bST on reproductive function in lactating dairy cows during heat stress. The experiment was conducted in southern Georgia from July to November 2005 using lactating Holstein cows (n = 276 for reproductive traits). For first service timed artificial insemination (TAI), cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF_2α given 14 d apart followed by a modified Ovsynch protocol (GnRH and insemination at 72 h following PGF_2α). Pregnancy was diagnosed by using ultrasonography on d 29 and reconfirmed by palpation between d 45 and 80 post-TAI. Nonpregnant cows were resynchronized with the modified Ovsynch protocol and received a second TAI. Treatment with bST started 1 wk before the start of Ovsynch and continued at 2-wk intervals. Blood samples were collected from a subset of cows to determine IGF-I profiles immediately before the first bST injection, 1 wk later, and at d 35 of bST treatment. Rectal temperatures were assessed on d 29 of bST treatment. Pregnancy rates (d 45 to 80 post-TAI) did not differ between bST and control cows for first- (16.7 vs. 15.2%) or second-service TAI (14.8 vs. 17.2%). Plasma concentrations of IGF-I and milk yield were greater for bST-treated cows following the initiation of bST treatment and bST increased rectal and vaginal temperatures. Body condition score was less for bST-treated cows. In conclusion, treatment with bST during heat stress increased IGF-I concentrations, milk yield over time, and rectal and vaginal temperatures without affecting first- or second-service pregnancy rates. Thus, at least under certain housing conditions, bST can be used to improve milk yield during heat stress without compromising fertility.     

Effect of pretreatment with prostaglandin F2alpha before resynchronization of ovulation on fertility of lactating dairy cows

Our objective was to assess the effect of pretreatment with PGF_2α 12 d before initiation of a protocol for resynchronization of ovulation (Resynch) using an Ovsynch protocol. Lactating Holstein cows diagnosed not pregnant 31 d after a timed artificial insemination (TAI) were randomly assigned to initiate the Resynch protocol 32 d after TAI (n = 255; RES), or receive 25 mg of PGF_2α 34 d after TAI and initiate the Resynch protocol 12 d later at 46 d after TAI (n = 272; PGF+RES). Within each treatment, a subset of cows were examined using transrectal ultrasonography to determine ovulatory response to the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocols or a blood sample was collected to determine serum progesterone (P₄) at initiation of the Resynch protocol, or both. Overall, PGF+RES cows had more pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) than RES cows 66 d after TAI (35.2 vs. 25.6%), whereas pregnancy loss from 31 to 66 d after TAI was greater for RES than PGF+RES cows (17.1 vs. 7.6%). Although P/AI was greater for cows with high (≥1.0 ng/mL) vs. low (<1.0 ng/mL) P₄ at the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocols, treatment did not affect the proportion of cows with low P₄ at the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocols. Overall, no effect of treatment on ovulatory response to the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocols was detected. We conclude that pretreatment with PGF_2α 12 d before initiation of the Resynch protocol increased P/AI 66 d after TAI for cows with serum P₄ concentration >1.0 ng/mL at the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocol and decreased pregnancy loss from 31 to 66 d after TAI. This modified resynchronization protocol may be a useful strategy for reproductive management of lactating dairy cows.     

Comparison of responses to Ovsynch between Holstein-Friesian and Swedish Red cows

The Ovsynch protocol was designed to synchronize ovulation, thereby allowing timed artificial insemination (TAI) of all cows without detection of estrus. However, the effectiveness of Ovsynch in different breeds of dairy cows has not been previously compared. The aim of this study was to compare the response to Ovsynch in cycling lactating Holstein-Friesian (HF) and Swedish Red (SR) dairy cows. A total of 495 cyclic cows (n = 347 HF, n = 148 SR) were housed together and treated with Ovsynch (GnRH - 7 d - PGF_2α - 56 h - GnRH - 16 to 18 h - TAI). Ovulatory responses, synchronization rate, maximal follicle size at the time of AI, and percentage of pregnant cows per AI (P/AI at 31 and 62 d after AI) were compared between breeds. Ultrasonography was performed during Ovsynch at first GnRH, PGF_2α, at time of AI, and 7 d after AI. Ovulatory response and synchronization rate were similar in HF versus SR cows (60.2 vs. 62.2%; 88.4 vs. 88.5%, respectively). Cows that ovulated to the first GnRH of Ovsynch had smaller follicle size at AI (15.9 ± 0.1 vs. 16.4 ± 0.2 mm). Maximal follicle size at AI was greater for HF (16.4 ± 2.2 mm) than SR (15.5 ± 2.3 mm) cows. The P/AI was greater for SR than HF cows at the 62-d pregnancy diagnosis (56.1 vs. 46.1%). In addition, pregnancy loss between 31 and 62 d of pregnancy was greater in HF (10.1%) than SR (3.5%) cows. Fertility was less in HF cows during the hot season (57.7 in cold vs. 38.1% in the hot season), whereas such a decrease was not observed in SR (60.0 in cold vs. 53.5% in the hot season) cows. Thus, although the GnRH treatments of Ovsynch were equally effective in SR and HF cows, pregnancy outcomes (P/AI at d 62 and pregnancy survival) were greater in SR than HF cows, and P/AI in SR cows was not compromised during the hot season as was found for HF cows.     

Increased fertility in lactating dairy cows resynchronized with Double-Ovsynch compared with Ovsynch initiated 32 d after timed artificial insemination

The objective was to determine if using a Double-Ovsynch protocol [DO; Pre-Resynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-3 d-GnRH, 7 d later Breeding-Resynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-timed artificial insemination (TAI)] to resynchronize ovulation after a previous TAI would increase synchrony and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) compared with an Ovsynch protocol initiated 32 d after TAI (D32; GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-TAI). Lactating Holstein cows at various days in milk and prior AI services were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to resynchronization treatments. All DO cows received the first GnRH injection of Pre-Resynch 22 d after TAI, and cows (n=981) diagnosed not pregnant using transrectal ultrasonography 29 d after TAI continued the protocol. Pregnancy status for all D32 cows was evaluated 29 d after TAI so fertility and pregnancy loss could be compared with that of DO cows. All D32 cows received the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch 32 d after TAI, and cows (n=956) diagnosed not pregnant using transrectal palpation 39 d after TAI continued the protocol. In a subgroup of cows from each treatment, ultrasonography (n=751) and serum progesterone (P4) concentrations (n=743) were used to determine the presence of a functional corpus luteum (CL) and ovulation to the first GnRH injection of D32 and Breeding-Resynch of DO (GnRH1), luteal regression after PGF before TAI, and ovulation to the GnRH injection before TAI (GnRH2). Overall, P/AI 29 d after TAI was not affected by parity and was greater for DO compared with D32 cows (39 vs. 30%). Pregnancy loss from 29 to 74 d after TAI was not affected by parity or treatment. The percentage of cows with a functional CL (P4 ≥1.0 ng/mL) at GnRH1 was greater for DO than D32 cows (81 vs. 58%), with most DO cows having medium P4 (60%; 1.0 to 3.49 ng/ml), whereas most D32 cows had either low (42%; <1.0 ng/mL) or high (36%; ≥3.5 ng/mL) P4 at GnRH1. Ovulation to GnRH1 was similar between treatments but was affected by serum P4 at GnRH. Cows with low P4 (<1.0 ng/mL) had the greatest ovulatory response (59%), followed by cows with medium (≥1.0 to 3.49 ng/mL; 38%) and then high (≥3.50 ng/mL; 16%) P4 at GnRH1. A greater percentage of DO cows were synchronized compared with D32 cows (72 vs. 51%) primarily due to a greater percentage of D32 than DO cows without a functional CL at the PGF injection before TAI (35 vs. 17%) or without complete CL regression before GnRH2 (17 vs. 7%). We conclude that DO increased fertility of lactating dairy cows during a resynchronization program primarily by increasing synchronization of cows during the Ovsynch protocol before TAI.