pH of multipurpose contact lens solutions over time.

The pH of nine different brands of multipurpose contact lens solutions available in Spain was determined over a period of 32 days after opening the bottles. Five bottles of nine solutions were used, each of which was buffered and obtained from different manufacturers. The pH measurements were taken using a micropH 2002 Crison pH-meter (accuracy +/- 0.001 pH units). Each solution was measured three times daily over the test period using 10-ml samples taken from the same container. Fluctuations in pH over time were observed but these were within the range of ocular comfort. The average pH of all the solutions tested proved to be between 6.99 and 7.56.     

Antiviral effect of multipurpose contact lens disinfecting solutions against coronavirus

PurposeTo evaluate the antiviral potential of five multipurpose disinfecting solutions against coronavirus (mouse hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 human corona virus).MethodsTest solutions (Biotrue, renu Advanced [Bausch and Lomb], ACUVUE RevitaLens [Johnson and Johnson Vision], cleadew [Ophtecs corp.] or AOSept Plus [Alcon]) were mixed with the coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus at 10⁴ plaque forming units (PFU)/mL as the final concentration and incubated at room temperature for the specified disinfection time. Surviving virus from each sample was then quantified by standard plaque forming unit assay and the reduction of PFU for each disinfectant was compared to the phosphate buffer saline (PBS) treated negative control. A regimen test was also conducted using Biotrue.ResultsThe three multipurpose disinfecting solutions Biotrue (containing PHMB and polyquaternium-1), renu Advanced (PHMB, polyquaternium-1 and alexidine) and ACUVUE RevitaLens (polyquaternium-1 and alexidine) did not kill the coronavirus at the manufacturers recommended disinfection time in the stand alone test. After treatment, the virus’s titer (3.8 ± 0.2 log₁₀ for Biotrue, 3.7 ± 0.1 log₁₀ for renu and 3.7 ± 0.2 log₁₀ for RevitaLens) was similar to the negative control (3.7 ± 0.1 log₁₀; p ≥ 0.996). AOSept Plus (hydrogen peroxide) and cleadew (povidone iodine) significantly (p < 0.001) reduced the numbers of coronaviruses to below the detection limit (i.e. killed 3.7 ± 0.1 log₁₀ viruses compared to control). However, there was a significant reduction (p = 0.028) in numbers of coronaviruses attached to lenses when using the regimen test with Biotrue.ConclusionsThis study shows that oxidative contact lens disinfecting solutions (i.e. those containing povidone-iodine or hydrogen peroxide) provide superior antiviral activity against a coronavirus surrogate of SARS-CoV-2, unless the full regimen test (rub, rinse, disinfect) is used.     

Effects of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the protein composition of the tear film.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the influence of multipurpose contact lens cleaning solutions on tear proteins. Changes in tear film protein profiles of contact lens wearers who used several marketed brands of multipurpose contact lens care solutions, were assessed by ProteinChip analysis. METHODS: Three studies were conducted. Study I was a comparison of Complete and OptiFree multipurpose solutions. Study II was a study with Complete Moisture Plus solution, Study II was a comparison of Renu and Solocare contact lens solutions. Wearers of soft contact lenses were assigned to use the contact lens care solutions for 4 weeks. Non-contact lens wearing patients were used as controls. Tear samples of each participant were analyzed with the ProteinChip (SELDI-TOF) system. Multivariate statistical analysis and artificial neural networks were used to determine the tear protein profiles of each study group. RESULTS: Before starting the use of the solutions, the tear protein composition in all contact lens wearers deviated from the tear composition of the non-contact lens wearing controls. After 4 weeks of using the different care regimens, the tear protein composition of the patients using Complete or Complete Moisture Plus solutions tended to move toward that of the non-contact lens wearing controls. The tear protein composition of patients using the OptiFree, Renu or Solocare solutions did not undergo a measureable change in the protein level. CONCLUSIONS: The ProteinChip system can analyze protein profiles for large-scale applications as in clinical studies. Two multipurpose solutions, Complete and Complete Moisture Plus, demonstrated a beneficial effect on the tear proteins in contact lens wearers.     

Comparison of the effect of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the viability of cultured corneal epithelial cells

Purpose

To determine the effect of four marketed multipurpose contact lens solutions (MPSs) on corneal epithelial cell viability.

Methods

Comparison of the effect of MPS A (Renu MultiPlus, Bausch &; Lomb), MPS B (OPTI-FREE Express, Alcon), MPS C (AQuify, CibaVision), and MPS D (OPTI-FREE RepleniSH, Alcon) on cell viability was performed by quantifying cellular ATP content, resazurin reduction, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in transformed human corneal epithelial cells (HCEpiC) and primary bovine corneal epithelial cells (BCEpiC).

Results

Significant reductions in cellular ATP content were observed at 40% solution and above with both MPS B and MPS D, compared to at 100% only for MPS A and MPS C, and similar results were obtained in BCEpiC. Effects on resazurin reduction were also less in HCEpiC exposed to increasing doses of MPS A and MPS C than in cells exposed to MPS B and MPS D. After 15 min, HCEpiC viability measured by both resazurin reduction and cellular ATP levels was significantly lower for cells exposed to MPS B, MPS D, and MPS C, while HCEpiC exposed to MPS A were not affected. MPS B and MPS D reduced cell viability more than MPS A and MPS C over a 2-h time course in both HCEpiC and BCEpiC.

Conclusions

Both MPS B and MPS D can cause large decreases in the viability of cultured corneal epithelial cells even with just a 2 h exposure at multiple doses. Significant reduction in cell viability is evident at brief 15-30 min exposures. In contrast, MPS A and MPS C have significantly less effect on the cell viability of corneal epithelial cells at multiple doses, after these short exposure times.     

The efficacy of povidone-iodine,hydrogen peroxide and a chemical multipurpose contact lens care system against Pseudomonas aeruginosa on various lens case surfaces

PurposeTo determine the antimicrobial efficacy of a povidone-iodine system (PVP-I; cleadew, OPHTECS Corporation, Kobe, Japan), a peroxide system (AOSEPT Plus with HydraGlyde, Alcon, Fort Worth, TX), and a chemical multipurpose system (renu fresh, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) on contact lens case surfaces that are both in contact and not in contact with the solutions during lens disinfection.MethodsThe surfaces of the inner walls, underside of the lid, and lens holder (if applicable) of the cases were inoculated with P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. The cases were disinfected with the solutions as per their manufacturer instructions. After disinfection, the inoculated surfaces were swabbed and the amount of surviving P. aeruginosa was determined. Following this experiment, separate cases were inoculated and disinfected as before. This time the cases were agitated after recommended disinfection time and the amount of P. aeruginosa in the disinfecting solution was quantified immediately, and again after resting for 7 days. Experiments were conducted in triplicate (n = 3).ResultsUnits are expressed in log CFU. All three solutions significantly reduced P. aeruginosa on direct-contact surfaces (all p < 0.039). On non-contact surfaces, the reduction of P. aeruginosa in the PVP-I system (pre-disinfection: 6.8 ± 0.5, post-disinfection: 1.0 ± 0.0; p < 0.001) was significant, but not for the hydrogen peroxide system (pre-disinfection: 6.3 ± 0.6, post: 5.5 ± 0.5; p = 0.194) and the chemical multipurpose system (pre-disinfection: 6.6 ± 0.1, post-disinfection: 5.6 ± 0.8; p = 0.336). After 7 days post-disinfection, no P. aeruginosa regrowth was observed in the PVP-I system (Day 1: 1.0 ± 0.0, Day 7: 1.0 ± 0.0; p = 1) and the chemical multipurpose system (Day 1: 4.2 ± 0.2, Day 7: 1.8 ± 0.9; p = 0.012), however regrowth was observed in the hydrogen peroxide system (Day 1: 3.4 ± 0.6, Day 7: 6.1 ± 0.4; p = 0.003).ConclusionThe PVP-I system was more effective against P. aeruginosa on non-contact surfaces than the hydrogen peroxide system or the chemical multipurpose system and is capable of inhibiting regrowth of P. aeruginosa for at least 7 days post-disinfection.     

Effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution on human corneal epithelial barrier function

PurposeTo explore the effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution (MPS) on the junction protein distribution and barrier function of cultured human corneal epithelial cell monolayers.MethodsCultured human corneal epithelial cells (HCEpiC) were exposed to a novel MPS (MPS A; Biotrue? multi-purpose solution, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated) at 50%, 75% and 100% for 10 or 30 min. Four commercially available MPS products, MPS B (AQuify, Ciba Vision), MPS C (COMPLETE MPS Easy Rub, AMO), MPS D (OPTI-FREE Express, Alcon) and MPS E (OPTI-FREE RepleniSH, Alcon) were tested in parallel. Tight junction structure and integrity were evaluated by confocal microscopy using ZO-1 antibody and scanning microscopy (SEM). Quantitative evaluation of MPSs on epithelial barrier function was determined by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) across HCEpiC grown on Transwell Clear permeable supports and on electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) electrode arrays.ResultsOverall after exposure to the three concentrations (50%, 75%, and 100%) of MPS A, ZO-1 distribution and fluorescent intensity on the cell surface appeared similar to the media control with continuous tight junctions and clear intercellular junctions. At all measured time points after exposure to MPS A (50% or 75%) there was also no effect on the TEER using both resistance methodologies, and SEM showed that MPS A appeared similar to the Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) control. In cells exposed to MPS D there was a dose-dependent change in the distribution of ZO-1, some cell detachment, and a decrease in monolayer resistance at all time points measured. Ultrastructurally, MPS D caused gross changes, including damage to cell junctions and plasma membranes. To a lesser extent, the remaining three commercial MPS products demonstrated some effects on tight junction ZO-1 distribution and/or TEER.ConclusionsBased on the in vitro measurements of tight junction protein expression, monolayer integrity, and transepithelial electrical resistance, the novel multipurpose contact lens solution (MPS A) did not alter corneal barrier function as compared to media, PBS or HBSS control. Clinical significance of the observed differences in epithelial barrier function among the MPSs tested needs further investigation.     

In vitro biocompatibility assessment of multipurpose contact lens solutions: effects on human corneal epithelial viability and barrier function

PurposeTo explore the in vitro effects of multipurpose contact lens solutions (MPSs) on corneal epithelial barrier function and viability.MethodsHuman corneal epithelial cells (HCEpiC) were exposed to 50% MPSs A–G. Viability was determined using metabolic activity, protease release and caspase assays. Barrier function was evaluated using immunostaining for the tight junction protein zonnula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and resistance measurements.ResultsMPS A and G did not affect HCEpiC monolayer viability after 2 h, while MPSs B–F significantly decreased viability. There was a significant decrease in stratified HCEpiC viability after exposure to MPSs B–E for 2 h, while there was no effect of MPS A. After exposure of HCEpiC monolayers to MPS A, F or G for 30 min, ZO-1 staining appeared similar to control. HCEpiC exposed to MPSs B and C demonstrated tight junction breakdown. There was no significant change in HCEpiC monolayer resistance after exposure to MPS A or F for 2 h, while MPSs B–E and G reduced resistance. After exposure to MPS A–E, stratified HCEpiC resistance was significantly decreased after 2 or 4 h. The decrease in resistance was significantly less with MPS A as compared to the other MPSs.ConclusionsMPSs caused varying modifications to cell viability and barrier function in monolayer and stratified HCEpiC. MPS A did not alter monolayer HCEpiC viability or barrier function, while MPSs B–G caused significant decreases of at least one parameter. Furthermore, MPS A had significantly less effect than MPSs B–E on viability and barrier function of stratified HCEpiC.     

Identification and susceptibility to multipurpose disinfectant solutions of bacteria isolated from contact lens storage cases of patients with corneal infiltrative events

Corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) are being reported with increasing frequency in lens wearers and may be related to specific multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS), contact lens type or bacterial bio-burden. Here, the efficacy of MPDS's against bacteria from contact lens storage cases (CLSC) of patients with CIEs was investigated. Eighteen CLSC from patients with CIEs were cultured. All reported using the same MPDS based on PQ-1 + Aldox + nonanoyl-EDTA prior to experiencing CIEs. Bacteria were identified and tested for sensitivity to MPDS-1 and three other MPSDs. 16/18 CLSC (89%) contained bacterial counts of ≥10⁴–10⁸/mL. Achromobacter spp. was most frequently identified and was found in 11/18 cases (61%). This was followed by 4/18 (22%) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 3/18 (17%) Serratia marcescens, 3/18 (17%) Delftia spp., 2/18 (11%) Elizabethkingia spp., 2/18 (11%) Chryseobacterium indologenes and 1/18 Sphingobacterium spiritivorum. Acanthamoeba was not isolated. All of the Achromobacter strains were resistant to MPDS-1 with <1 log₁₀ kill up to 14 days exposure and the solution also showed reduced efficacy against the other isolates at the manufacturer's recommended disinfection time of 6 h. Two strains of S. maltophilia and Delftia spp. grew in the solution over 14 days. Factors responsible for causing adverse events such as CIEs in contact lens wearers remain unclear. However, the presence of significant bio-burden in the contact lens storage case and lens may initiate an immunological response resulting in CIEs either directly or through the release of endotoxins (e.g. lipopolysaccharides) from the bacterial outer cell membrane.     

Antimicrobial efficacy of a novel povidone iodine contact lens disinfection system

Purpose

Contact lens (CL) wear is a risk factor for the acquisition of microbial keratitis. Accordingly, compliance to manufacturers’ recommended hygiene and disinfection procedures are vital to safe (CL) use. In this study we evaluated a novel povidone-iodine (PI) (CL) disinfection system (cleadew, Ophtecs Corporation, Japan) against a range of bacterial, fungal and Acanthamoeba.

The refractive index of contact lens saline solutions

PurposeThe aim of this study was to measure the refractive index of three readily available contact lens saline solutions in order that these values could be used in a calculation to convert back vertex power measured in saline to its corresponding power in air.MethodUsing an automatic digital refractometer, measurements were made daily for 31 days at 20 °C and at a wavelength of 589.3 nm of the refractive index of fifteen bottles from different manufacturing batches of each of the three saline solutions.ResultsFor AMO LENS PLUS™ OcuPure™, BAUSCH & LOMB Sensitive Eyes™ Plus Saline Solution and Sauflon saline, the mean values of refractive index were 1.33458, 1.33465 and 1.33470, respectively. The standard deviation for each solution was 0.00001 and the range of the measured values of refractive index of the three solutions over the test period did not exceed 0.00005.ConclusionsIt is proposed that when calculating back vertex power in air from measurements made in a wet cell that refractive index values for AMO LENS PLUS™ OcuPure™, BAUSCH & LOMB Sensitive Eyes™ Plus Saline Solution and Sauflon saline of 1.3347, 1.3348 and 1.3348, respectively be used for focimeters operating at a wavelength of 587.56 nm and values of 1.3361, 1.3362 and 1.3362, respectively when a wavelength of 546.07 nm is used.     

Effect of multipurpose solutions for contact lens care on the in vitro drug-induced spoliation of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) in simulated aqueous humour.

Drug-induced spoliation of hydrogels as contact lenses or as implants in the anterior eye is a frequent occurrence in clinical practice. This study explores the capacity of three commercial multipurpose solutions for contact lens care to reduce the spoliation of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) specimens exposed to a simulated aqueous humour formulation and to three topical drugs commonly administered after insertion of artificial corneas (Predsol, Optimol and Depo-Ralovera). ReNu MultiPlus (Bausch & Lomb), Complete Blink-N-Cleantrade mark Lens Drops (Allergan) and Complete Protein Remover Tablets dissolved in Complete ComfortPLUS (both from Allergan) were evaluated. All multipurpose solutions were able to dislodge passively the deposits formed on hydrogels in the simulated aqueous and in the presence of Predsol and Optimol, but none were effective against the deposits induced by Depo-Ralovera. A reduction of the calcium content in deposits caused by Predsol and Optimol was confirmed after treatment with the protein remover preparation, while the other multipurpose solutions caused the complete removal of the deposits. In experiments designed to evaluate the preventive action of the multipurpose solutions, no such effects were observed regardless of the drug involved. The prospect of using multipurpose solutions as eye drops following implantation of a hydrogel artificial cornea is a valid alternative for reducing device spoliation, however it appears to depend on the nature of the postoperative medication.     

Amoebicidal activity of a preserved contact lens multipurpose disinfecting solution compared to a disinfection/neutralisation peroxide system.

The amoebicidal activity of a contact lens multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS) containing polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine was compared to a disinfection/neutralisation peroxide system against Acanthamoeba castellanii and Acanthamoeba polyphaga trophozoites and cysts. A quantitative microtitre method was used to evaluate the solutions. The MPDS showed similar amoebicidal activity to the disinfection/neutralisation peroxide system against the trophozoites of both species and equal or more rapid activity against the cysts of both species.