Reactive compatibilization of PE/PS blends. Effect of copolymer chain length on interfacial adhesion and mechanical behavior

This paper deals with in situ compatibilization of PE/PS blends via Friedel-Crafts reaction, performed at the interphase. Two polyethylenes having different molecular weights, and the same PS, were used along a wide range of catalyst concentration. The influence of the graft copolymer architecture and content on the efficiency of blend compatibilization was studied. The emulsifying effect, morphological aspects and mechanical behavior were also assessed for these blends. The amount of copolymer formed increases with catalyst concentration and the short chain length fraction of the homopolymers. The high molecular weight (MW) copolymers behaved as better compatibilizers as they showed, at the cmc, greater graft copolymer concentration than the low MW ones. A substantial increase in interfacial adhesion and particle size reduction was observed, even at catalyst concentrations as low as 0.3 wt%. In correspondence, mechanical properties, like ductility and yield strength, were enhanced by the effect of this Friedel-Crafts reaction's compatibilization.     

Effect of block copolymers of various molecular architecture on the phase morphology and tensile properties of LDPE rich (LDPE/PS) blends

The emulsification efficiency of three different block copolymers consisting of hydrogenated polybutadiene (HPB) and polystyrene (PS), i.e. a pure diblock , a tapered diblock and a triblock copolymer has been compared in low density polyethylene/polystyrene (LDPE/PS) blends rich in polyethylene. The comparison relies upon the ability of these potential interfacial agents to stabilize fine phase dispersion and to promote good interfacial adhesion. Based on the phase morphology, the ultimate tensile properties and the dynamic viscosity of the modified blends, the tapered diblock copolymer is clearly the most efficient emulsifier. For instance a plateau is observed in the property-copolymer content dependence when 2 wt% tapered diblock are used compared to ca. 5 wt% in case of the pure diblock. In contrast, no plateau is observed when the triblock copolymer is used. This is assumed to result from a less quantitative localization of these two copolymers i.e. the pue diblock or the triblock at the LDPE/PS interface.     

Effect of diblock copolymers on morphology and mechanical properties for syndiotactic polystyrene/ethylene‐propylene copolymer blends

Interfacial agents are often used to compatibilize immiscible polymer blends. They are known to reduce the interfacial tension, homogenize the morphology, and improve adhesion between phases. In this study, two diblock copolymers of styrene/ethylene‐propylene (SEP), which have different molecular weights, were used to compatibilize a blend of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) 75% and ethylene‐propylene rubber (EPR) 25% so as to extend the applications of sPS as incoming thermoplastics. The morphological analysis and emulsification curve, which relates the average size of the dispersion particles to the concentration of diblock copolymers added, was used to investigate the efficiency of the interfacial agents on the blend morphology. A notched izod impact test and a tensile test were also performed to determine the compatibilization effect of different molecular weight copolymers on the mechanical properties of the blends and to establish links between morphology and mechanical properties. Results suggest that the lower molecular weight diblock copolymer showed an effective emulsifying capacity for sPS/ERP immiscible blend in morphology and mechanical properties. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91:3618–3626, 2004     

The Use of Ethylene/Propylene Copolymers as Compatibilizers for Recycled Polyolefin Blends

Compatibilizing effects of ethylene/propylene (EPR) diblock copolymers on the morphology and mechanical properties of immiscible blends produced from recycled low‐density polyethylene (PE‐LD) and high‐density polyethylene (PE‐HD) with 20 wt.‐% of recycled poly(propylene) (PP) were investigated. Two different EPR block copolymers which differ in ethylene monomer unit content were applied to act as interfacial agents. The morphology of the studied blends was observed by scanning‐ (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It was found that both EPR copolymers were efficient in reducing the size of the dispersed phase and improving adhesion between PE and PP phases. Addition of 10 wt.‐% of EPR caused the formation of the interfacial layer surrounding dispersed PP particles with the occurrence of PE‐LD lamellae interpenetration into the layer. Tensile properties (elongation at yield, yield stress, elongation at break, Young's modulus) and notched impact strength were measured as a function of blend composition and chemical structure of EPR. It was found that the EPR with a higher content of ethylene monomer units was a more efficient compatibilizer, especially for the modification of PE‐LD/PP 80/20 blend. Notched impact strength and ductility were greatly improved due to the morphological changes and increased interfacial adhesion as a result of the EPR localization between the phases. No significant improvements of mechanical properties for recycled PE‐HD/PP 80/20 blend were observed by the addition of selected block copolymers.     

Morphology and mechanical properties of poly(propylene)/polystyrene blends compatibilized with polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene-co-propylene)

Compatibilizing effects of diblock copolymer polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene-co-propylene) (SEP) on the morphology and mechanical properties of immiscible blends of poly(propylene) (PP) and polystyrene (PS) were investigated. Notched impact strength, yield stress, elongation at yield and Young's modulus were determined as a function of different weight ratios of PP and PS and different amounts of added SEP as well. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a two-phase morphology of PP/PS blends, which exhibit poor mechanical properties. Even 2,5 wt.-% of SEP added to PP/PS blends can improve the notched impact strength and elongation at yield compared to non-compatibilized PP/PS blends. 10 wt.-% of SEP compatibilizer converted the brittle PP/PS blend to quite impactresistant polymeric material. Mechanical properties were improved because of the morphological changes and increased interfacial adhesion as a result of SEP localization between PP and PS phases. An analysis of yield stress data in terms of theoretical models showed that yield stress values of binary PP/PS blends can be predicted with Nielsen's model.     

Mechanical properties and morphology of crosslinked PP/PE blends and PP/PE/propylene–ethylene copolymer blends

Blending is an effective method for improving polymer properties. However, the problem of phase separation often occurs due to incompatibility of homopolymers, which deteriorates the physical properties of polyblends. In this study, isotactic polypropylene was blended with low-density polyethylene. Crosslinking agent and copolymers of propylene and ethylene (either random copolymer or block copolymer) were added to improve the interfacial adhesion of PP/LDPE blends. The tensile strength, heat deflection temperature, and impact strength of these modified PP/PE blends were investigated. The microstructures of polyblends have been studied to interpret the mechanical behavior through dynamic viscoelasticity, wide-angle X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, picnometry, and scanning electron microscopy. The properties of crosslinked PP/PE blends were determined by the content of crosslinking agent and processing method. For the material blended by roll, a 2% concentration of peroxide corresponded to a maximum tensile strength and minimum impact strength. However, the mechanical strength of those products blended by extrusion monotonously decreased with increasing peroxide content because of serious degradation. The interfacial adhesion of PP/PE blends could be enhanced by adding random or block copolymer of propylene and ethylene, and the impact strength as well as ductility were greatly improved. Experimental data showed that the impact strength of PP/LDPE/random copolymer ternary blend could reach as high as 33.3 kg · cm/cm; however, its rigidity and tensile strength were inferior to those of PP/LDPE/block copolymer blend.     

Mechanical behaviour of PS/PVC blends compatibilized with block-graft copolymers based on poly(styrene-block-butadiene)

Blends composed of polystyrene (PS) and polyvinylchloride (PVC) are incompatible due to unfavourable interactions. Consequently, their mechanical properties such as impact strength and elongation at break are only very poor. The key to successfully influence the properties of such heterogeneous blends lies in the control of the interface. High interface tensions and an insufficient phase adhesion often lead to coarse phase morphologies which are thermodynamically and kinetically unstable. However, with radically synthesized, tailor made block-graft copolymers P(S-b-(B-g-CHMA, MMA)) based on a styrene/butadiene two-block copolymer P(S-b-B) which are grafted with poly(cyclohexylmethacrylate) (PCHMA) or poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA), the phase morphology can be markedly refined and the blends surprisingly show ductile behaviour. Thus, the impact strength of so modified PS/PVC 1 : 1 blends is about ten times higher than in the unmodified case and is thereby similar to impact modified PS. Electron microscopy (SEM, TEM) reveals that the modified PS/PVC blends owe their improved mechanical properties to the interface selectivity of the block-graft copolymers and therefore to a superior phase adhesion.     

Compatibilization effects of block copolymers in high density polyethylene/syndiotactic polystyrene blends

Three triblock copolymers of poly[styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene] (SEBS) of different molecular weights and one diblock copolymer of poly[styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)] (SEB) were used to compatibilize high density polyethylene/syndiotactic polystyrene (HDPE/sPS, 80/20) blend. Morphology observation showed that phase size of the dispersed sPS particles was significantly reduced on addition of all the four copolymers and the interfacial adhesion between the two phases was dramatically enhanced. Tensile strength of the blends increased at lower copolymer content but decreased with increasing copolymer content. The elongation at break of the blends improved and sharply increased with increments of the copolymers. Drop in modulus of the blend was observed on addition of the rubbery copolymers. The mechanical performance of the modified blends is strikingly dependent not only on the interfacial activity of the copolymers but also on the mechanical properties of the copolymers, particularly at the high copolymer concentration. Addition of compatibilizers to HDPE/sPS blend resulted in a significant reduction in crystallinity of both HDPE and sPS. Measurements of Vicat softening temperature of the HDPE/sPS blends show that heat resistance of HDPE is greatly improved upon incorporation of 20 wt% sPS.     

Enthalpic interaction of diblock copolymers with immiscible polymer blend components

Summary An attempt is made to extend the model of Leibler for the emulsifying activity and interfacial properties of A-b-B diblock copolymers in incompatible blends of the homopolymers A and B-which are identical with the respective copolymer components- to enthalpically interacting C-b-D diblock copolymers, the block C being thermodynamically compatible with A and D with B. Due to the attractive enthalpic interaction the A/C-b-D/B compatibilized blends are promising for optimum phase adhesion (bold types for thermodynamically compatible partners). Thus, the extended model for a plane interfacial layer includes the enthalpic interaction of the compatible polymer pairs beside the entropic effects. The approach starts with the equillibrium supposition, not taking into consideration enthalpy driven migration effects of the block copolymer from the bulk to the interface, The model confirms a dominant role of the enthalpic interaction between blocks of the diblock copolymer and the respective homopolymers to the compatibilization of incompatible blend components. It is applicable also for blends compatibilized with block copolymers of unfavourable repulsive type interaction, A/C-b-D/B, and for blend systems with mixed type interactions, e. g. A/C-b-B/B or A/C-b-D/B.     

Effect of the molecular structure of ethene–propene and styrene–butadiene copolymers on their compatibilization efficiency in low‐density polyethylene/polystyrene blends

The effect of the molecular structure of styrene–butadiene (SB) block copolymers and ethene–propene (EPM) random copolymers on the morphology and tensile impact strength of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE)/polystyrene (PS) (75/25) blends has been studied. The molecular characteristics of SB block copolymers markedly influence their distribution in LDPE/PS blends. In all cases, an SB copolymer is present not only at the interface but also in the bulk phases; this depends on its molecular structure. In blends compatibilized with diblock copolymers, compartmentalized PS particles can also be observed. The highest toughness values have been achieved for blends compatibilized with triblock SB copolymers. A study of the compatibilization efficiency of SB copolymers with the same number of blocks has shown that copolymers with shorter PS blocks are more efficient. A comparison of the obtained results with previous results indicates that the compatibilization efficiency of a copolymer strongly depends both on the blend composition and on the properties of the components. The compatibilization efficiency of an EPM/SB mixture is markedly affected by the rheological properties of the copolymers. The addition of an EPM/SB mixture containing EPM with a higher viscosity leads to a higher improvement or at least the same improvement in the tensile impact strength of a compatibilized blend as the same amount of neat SB. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Influence of diblock copolymer on the morphology and properties of polystyrene/poly(dimethylsiloxane) blends

Blends of polystyrene (PS) and poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), with and without diblock copolymers (PS‐b‐PDMS), were prepared by melt mixing. The melt rheology behavior of the blends was studied with a capillary rheometer. The morphology of the blends was examined with scanning electron microscopy. The miscibility of the blends was studied with differential scanning calorimetry. The morphology of PS/PDMS blends was modified by the addition of PS‐b‐PDMS copolymers and investigated as a function of the molar mass of the diblock copolymers, viscosity ratios and the processing conditions. As investigated, the observed morphology of the melt‐blended PS/PDMS pair unambiguously supported the interfacial activity of the diblock copolymers. When a few percent of the diblock copolymers blended together with the PS and PDMS homopolymers, the phase size was reduced and the phase dispersion was firmly stabilized against coalescence. The compatibilizing efficiency of the copolymers was strongly dependent on its molar mass. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2747–2757, 2004     

Modified interfacial tensions measured in situ in ternary polymer blends demonstrating partial wetting

An in situ Neumann triangle-focused ion beam-atomic force microscopy (NT-FIB-AFM) method has been used to measure modified PS/HDPE interfacial tensions in ternary PS/PP/HDPE blends prepared by melt mixing and demonstrating partial wetting. The ternary blend was modified with SEB, SB and SEBS copolymers. Results related to the position of the PS droplet at the interface show that a symmetrical diblock copolymer is somewhat more efficient in decreasing the interfacial tension compared to an asymmetrical one of similar molecular weight, while the SEBS triblock copolymer appears to have no effect at all. Using the NT-FIB-AFM method, the lowest modified PS/HDPE interfacial tension is 3.0 ± 0.4 mN/m for the symmetric diblock, compared to 4.2 ± 0.6 mN/m (N = 34) for the unmodified interface. This corresponds to an apparent areal density in SEB copolymer equal to 0.16 ± 0.03 molecules/nm², which is near reported saturation values. By varying the concentration of the copolymer, an emulsification curve reporting the value of the PS/HDPE modified interfacial tension as a function of the apparent areal density of the copolymer at the PS/HDPE interface has been obtained. The interfacial tension values obtained by the NT-FIB-AFM approach are significantly higher than the 0.5 ± 0.2 mN/m (N = 3) result obtained by using the classical breaking thread method with the same materials. This discrepancy does not appear to be due to a poor migration of the copolymer to the PS/HDPE interface, but could instead be attributed to the interfacial elasticity of the compatibilized interface, a phenomena that has not been accounted for so far in experimental studies on the morphology of compatibilized multicomponent polymer blends.     

SEP和蒙脱土复合增强PP／PS合金的研究

观察了聚丙烯(PP)/聚苯乙烯(PS)／(苯乙烯-乙烯/丙烯二嵌段共聚物)(SEP)合金的形态，测定了SEP、SEP/改性蒙脱土复合材料对PP／PS合金的力学性能的影响。结果表明：SEP在EPP／PS合金中作为增容剂，减小了分散相的平均粒子尺寸，大大改变了合金的形态，增强了两相间的粘合力，提高了合金的力学性能，并对PP/PS(20／80)合金的增容作用较为显著。结果还表明：SEP／改性蒙脱土复合材料对PP／PS(20／80)合金具有增韧增强的效果。     

Polymer blends of poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) with polystyrene compatibilized by styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers. I. Rheology,morphology, and mechanical properties

The compatibilization of blends of poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) with polystyrene (PS), through the styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers (SG) containing various glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) contents, was investigated in this study. SG copolymers are able to react with PEN terminal groups during melt blending, resulting in the formation of desirable SG‐g‐PEN copolymers in the blend. These in situ formed copolymers tend to reside along the interface preferentially as the result of interfacial reaction and thus function as effective compatibilizers in PEN/PS blends. The compatibilized blends exhibit higher viscosity, finer phase domain, and improved mechanical properties. It is found that the degree of grafting of the in situ formed SG‐g‐PEN copolymer has to be considered as well. In blends compatibilized with the SG copolymer containing higher GMA content, heavily grafted copolymers would be produced. The length of the styrene segment in these heavily grafted copolymers would be too short to penetrate deep enough into the PS phase to form effective entanglements, resulting in the lower compatibilization efficiency in PEN/PS blends. Consequently, the in situ formation of SG‐g‐PEN copolymers with an optimal degree of grafting is the key to achieving the best performance for the eventually produced PEN/PS blends through SG copolymers. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 967–975, 2003     

Rheology, morphology and tensile properties of reactive compatibilized polyethylene/polystyrene blends via Friedel–Crafts alkylation reaction

Attempts were made to study the effect of reactive compatibilization via Friedel?CCrafts alkylation reaction, using AlCl₃ as a catalyst, on rheology, morphology, and mechanical properties of polyethylene/polystyrene (PE/PS) blends. The results of linear viscoelastic measurements in conjunction with the results of the mixing torque variation indicated that PS showed much more degradation than that of PE in the presence of AlCl₃. It was also found that while for PE-rich blends, the viscosity, and storage modulus increased by reactive compatibilization, they decreased for PS-rich blends. The variation of viscosity and storage modulus for 50/50 blend was found to be dependent on frequency ranges showing the competitive effects of PE?Cg?CPS copolymer formation and PS degradation. The results of morphological studies showed that reactive compatibilization decreased the particle size and particle-size distribution broadness because of in situ graft copolymer formation. Reactive compatibilization enhanced the tensile strength and elongation at break for PE-rich blends. It was demonstrated that there is a close interrelationship between rheology, morphology, and mechanical properties of reactive compatiblized PE/PS blends. It was also demonstrated that rheological behaviors have a reliable sensitivity to follow the structural and morphological changes during compatibilization process, so that, those information can be used to predict the morphology as well as mechanical properties of the blends.     

Ultraporous poly(l-lactide) scaffolds prepared with quaternary immiscible polymer blends modified by copolymer brushes at the interface

The activity of polystyrene-block-poly(l-lactide) (PS-b-PLLA) and polystyrene-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) diblock copolymer brushes located at a PS/PLLA interface were employed as a route to control the final microstructure of 95% void volume, ultraporous PLLA scaffolds. The latter were initially prepared from melt-processed quaternary blends of ethylene propylene diene rubber/poly(?-caprolactone)/polystyrene/poly(l-lactide) (EPDM/PCL/PS/PLLA) 45/45/5/5%vol. modified with the diblock copolymers. The blends display a layer comprised of the PS and PLLA phases located at the interface of the co-continuous EPDM and PCL phases. When the PS-b-PLLA copolymer is added, sub-micrometric PLLA droplets are encapsulated within the PS continuous layer phase. In comparison, both the PS and PLLA phases compete for the encapsulation process when the PS-b-PMMA is used, indicating that the microstructure of the PLLA phase can be fine-tuned with an adequate choice of interfacial modifier. These effects were investigated by analyzing the microstructure of ternary high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/PS/PMMA 80/10/10%vol. blends displaying PS/PMMA shell/core composite droplets in a HDPE matrix. An inversion of the shell/core structure is observed when the PS-b-PLLA copolymer is used to compatibilize the PS/PMMA interface, whereas no such restructuring occurs with the PS-b-PMMA. These effects are explained by the activity and swelling powers of the copolymer brushes. For the EPDM/PCL/PS/PLLA quaternary systems modified with the PS-b-PMMA, the PLLA homopolymer phase significantly penetrates and swells the PMMA blocks due to their mutual high affinity, as compared to the classical like-prefers-like compatibilization approach. The swelling of the blocks will tend to bend the interface toward the PS phase in order to minimize the lateral compression of the PMMA blocks. A similar effect explains the reversal of the PS/PMMA shell/core structure in the HDPE/PS/PMMA ternary system. This level of control ultimately leads to quite significant differences in microstructures and surface textures for the PLLA scaffolds.     

Polystyrene/EVA melt blends compatibilized with EVA-graft-polystyrene

The influence of poly[(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate)-g-polystyrene] (EVA-g-PS) on the mechanical and morphological properties of polystyrene and the blends with EVA copolymers has been investigated. The melt blends have been performed in a twin-screw extruder. The addition of the graft copolymer enhances the mechanical properties and impact resistance of the PS matrix and PS/EVA (90 : 10 wt %) blends. Better results on impact strength and elongation at break have been achieved by using a EVA-g-PS graft copolymer with a higher EVA proportion by weight. This graft copolymer also contains a lower molecular weight of the PS-grafted segments than the PS matrix. Morphological studies by scanning electron microscopy revealed some interfacial adhesion between the components in the compatibilized polymer blends. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65: 2141–2149, 1997     

Effect of mixing protocol on compatibilized polymer blend morphology

We investigated the effect of mixing protocol on the morphology of compatibilized polymer blends made with premade compatibilizer and reactively formed in‐situ compatibilizer in a custom‐built miniature mixer Alberta Polymer Asymmetric Minimixer (APAM). The compatibilized blends show a finer morphology than uncompatibilized blends if the polymers are mixed together in the dry state and then fed into the mixer. It is found that premelting one polymer, and premixing polymers and compatibilizer, both greatly affect the compatibilized blends' morphology. The effects are complex since the dispersed phase particle size and distribution of the compatibilized blends may be smaller or larger when compared with the uncompatibilized system, depending on the material's physical and chemical properties; for example, diblock molecular weight or the preference of copolymer to migrate to a particular phase can change the final morphology. Good mobility of the copolymer to reach the interface is crucial to obtain a finer morphology. Micelles are observed when a high molecular weight diblock copolymer P(S‐b‐MMA) is used for a PS/PMMA blend. Because of its enhanced mobility, no micelles are found for a low molecular weight diblock copolymer P(S‐b‐MMA) in a PS/PMMA blend. For PS/PE/P(S‐b‐E) blends, finer morphology is obtained when P(S‐b‐E) is first precompounded with PS. Because the block copolymer prefers the PE phase, if the P(S‐b‐E) block copolymer is compounded with PE first, some remains inside the PE phase and does not compatibilize the interface. In the case of reactive blend PSOX/PEMA, premelting and holding the polymers at high temperature for 5 min decreases final dispersed phase particle size; however, premelting and holding for 10 min coarsens the morphology. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:691–702, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Compatibilizing effect of poly(styrene)‐block‐poly(isoprene) copolymers in heterogeneous poly(styrene)/natural rubber blends

Compatibility of poly(styrene) (PS)/natural rubber (NR) blend is improved by the addition of diblock copolymer of poly(styrene) and cis‐poly(isoprene) (PS‐b‐PI). The compatibilizing effect has been investigated as a function of block copolymer molecular weight, composition and concentration. The effect of homopolymer molecular weight, processing conditions and mode of addition on the morphology of the dispersed phase have also been investigated by means of optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. A sharp decrease in phase dimensions is observed with the addition of a few percent of block copolymers. The effect levels off at higher concentrations. The leveling off could be an indication of interfacial saturation. For concentrations below the critical value, the particle size reduction is linear with copolymer volume fraction and agrees well with the prediction of Noolandi and Hong. The addition of the block copolymer improves the mechanical properties of the blend. An attempt is made to correlate the mechanical properties with the morphology of the blends. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Enthalpic effects on interfacial adhesion of immiscible polymers compatibilized with block copolymers

The influence of enthalpic interactions on interfacial adhesion between immiscible polymer matrices and reinforcing block copolymer segments has been studied using the transmission electron microscopic (TEM) methodology of Creton et al. We examined the behaviour of four statistical styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers, each having different acrylonitrile (AN) content, blended with polystyrene (PS) as the minor component, and reinforced by three poly(methyl methacrylate-b-styrene) (PMMA-b-PS) block copolymers of differing molar masses, viz. 20000, 65000 and 680000 g mol⁻¹. These observations were compared with similar experiments on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blended with PS and reinforced by PMMA-b-PS. Emulsification was observed with all three PMMA-b-PS copolymers. Crazes were formed in the SAN matrices and a statistical evaluation of interfacial failures was performed on the discrete PS domains that lay within the crazes. For the two block copolymers of higher molar mass, optimal reinforcement of the interfaces was observed independent of the SAN composition. With the 20000 block copolymer, however, the pattern of the interfacial failure depended strongly on the SAN composition. Specifically, it was observed that the fraction of the discrete particles that suffered interfacial failure, and led to the creation of large voids in the crazes in these blends, increased with increased AN content of the SAN matrix. Thus, we found that the fraction of discrete PS particles that produce large voids in crazes of blends containing SAN33 is always higher than in blends containing SAN15, when reinforced with the 20000 PMMA-b-PS. We infer that the critical molar mass required of a mechanically reinforcing copolymer depends on the short-range (attractive and repulsive) interactions between the blend components in the interfacial region. The TEM method could not, however, distinguish between reinforced and neat PMMA/PS blends, all of which showed strong adhesion. This is attributed to the comparatively diffuse interface in the PMMA/PS system, a consequence of the relatively weak repulsion between these two polymers.