Learning about associations: Evidence for a hierarchical account of occasion setting.

In 2 experiments rats were trained on a switching discrimination, with 4 occasion setters, A, B, C, and D and 2 target stimuli, x and y. When signaled either by A or by B, x was reinforced with food and y was not, whereas when signaled either by C or by D these reinforcement relations were reversed (i.e., A: → x+, A: y → ?, B: x → +, B: y → ?, C: x → ?, C: y → +, D: x → ?, D: y → +). In a subsequent Stage A was paired with shock, and then the degree to which food–reinforced (Experiment 1a) and nonreinforced (Experiment 1b) presentations of x and y were capable of eliciting fear was assessed. Those conditioned stimulus (CS)/unconditioned stimulus (US) relations that had been operative in the presence of the fear-eliciting occasion setter A (i.e., x → +, y → ?) elicited more fear than the alternative CS/US combinations (i.e., x → ?, y → +). The implications of these findings are discussed with reference to theories of occasion setting and of configural learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Further tests of response–outcome associations in differential-outcome matching-to-sample.

Two transfer-of-control experiments assessed pigeons' sensitivity to response-outcome associations in differential-outcome discriminations. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained on one-to-many matching-to-sample with food and no-food outcomes that were differential or nondifferential with respect to correct choice. The samples were then replaced by novel stimuli that had differential or nondifferential associations with those same outcomes. Transfer of matching occurred only when the novel samples and their respective choice responses had identical differential-outcome associations. Experiment 2 showed that the outcomes themselves were effective samples if the choices they cued yielded those outcomes in training. These data provide further evidence that the relations between comparison choice and consequent outcomes influences pigeons' matching performances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Overshadowing and associability change.

Three appetitive Pavlovian conditioning experiments with rats examined the associability of stimuli A and B that had a history of compound conditioning (AB+), relative to stimuli X and Y that had a history of conditioning in isolation (X+, Y+). Following this training, Experiment 1 revealed that conditioned responding was higher to X and Y than to A and B (overshadowing). In a subsequent AY+, AX?, BY? test discrimination, the AY/BY discrimination was solved more readily than the AY/AX discrimination. In Experiment 2, following AB+, X+, Y+ training, A and Y were presented as a compound and signaled the availability of reinforcement upon the performance of an instrumental response. Test trials in which A and Y were presented alone, and in extinction, revealed that A acquired greater control of instrumental responding than Y. Experiment 3 revealed that following AB+, X+, Y+ training, A and B served as more effective discriminative stimuli for instrumental responding than X and Y. Overall, these results imply that the associability of stimuli conditioned in compound is higher than stimuli conditioned in isolation. These results are discussed in terms of attentional theories of associative learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Contextual modulation of stimulus generalization in rats.

One connectionist analysis of the acquired equivalence/distinctiveness of cues assumes that when similar compounds (e.g., AX and BX) are paired with the same outcome (e.g., food, +; or no food, ?), their components come to activate the same configural unit (ABX). When these compounds are paired with different outcomes, their components will come to address different units. Here, rats received appetitive training with eight compounds (e.g., AX+, BX+, CX?, DX?, AY+, BY?, CY?, DY+) that should generate the following configural units: ABX, CDX, ADY, and BCY. In Experiment 1, rats then received aversive conditioning to A, which should activate and revalue representations ABX and ADY. Subsequently, compounds that provided dual activation (i.e., BX and DY) of one of the revalued configural units (ABX and ADY) were shown to elicit greater fear than those compounds that provided a single source of activation to each unit (i.e., DX and BY). Experiment 2 confirmed and extended these findings. These results provide support for the connectionist analysis outlined above and are consistent with the application of this approach to the acquired equivalence/distinctiveness of cues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.

Pigeons in two experiments were first trained with a set of simple discriminations of the form AX+ CX?, BY+ DY? where A, B, C, and D were relevant, and belonged to one dimension, and X and Y were irrelevant and belonged to a different dimension. They were then tested with a discrimination of the form AX+ AY? BX?. The experiments revealed that the discrimination between AX+ and BX? was acquired more readily than between AX+ and AY?, which indicates that the original training resulted in the associability of the relevant stimuli being greater than that of the irrelevant stimuli. Experiment 2 revealed that the status of other stimuli from the two dimensions influenced these changes in associability. The associability of X and Y was enhanced by making other stimuli from the same dimension relevant, and the associability of A and B was reduced by making other stimuli from the same dimension irrelevant. The associability of the stimuli is attributed to the attention they are paid. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations.

This study assessed the role of stimulus–outcome (S–O) and response–outcome (R–O) associations in differential outcome performances. In Experiment 1, pigeons learned one-to-many matching-to-sample with differential R–O associations but with either differential or nondifferential sample-outcome (S–O) associations. Later, both groups showed strong transfer of matching to novel samples that were differentially associated with the same outcomes used in training. Experiment 2 reversed the training conditions for each group. The switch from differential to nondifferential S–O associations produced a large drop in matching accuracy, whereas the opposite switch had only a small effect. Following recovery, both groups again showed positive transfer to novel samples, although transfer was stronger following differential S–O training. These data support a 2-process ("outcome expectancy") account of differential outcome performances but also indicate a contribution of bidirectional R–O associations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Role of within-compound associations in occasion setting: A blocking analysis.

Retracted October 1990. (See record 1991-03475-001.) In two experiments with rat subjects we evaluated the relation between within-compound associations and occasion setting established during feature-positive discriminations. Various treatments preceded serial feature-positive discrimination training in which A and B served as the feature, and X as the element common to reinforced and nonreinforced trials. In Experiment 1, prior serial feature-positive training using A as the feature blocked acquisition of an association between the novel B feature and the unconditioned stimulus (US), an association between the novel B and the common element (X), and the occasion-setting function of B. However, prior simultaneous feature-positive training using A as the feature blocked an association between the novel B and the US and between B and X but did not block acquisition of an occasion-setting function by B. In Experiment 2, serial nondifferential conditioning endowed the A stimulus with the capacity to block acquisition of a B–US association and a within-compound association between B and X but did not prevent acquisition of occasion setting to B. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Combined hippocampal and amygdala lesions block learning of a response-independent form of occasion-setting.

This study compared rats with dorsal striatal, ventrolateral prefrontal cortical, and combined lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala to sham controls on a conditional discrimination task in which contextual cues modulated a taste aversion. All groups were able to acquire this occasion setting task. The 2nd experiment functionally minimized the stimulus–response component of the paradigm, creating a "tasteless" form of occasion setting. Rats with pretraining lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala were impaired compared with shams on the acquisition of this tasteless occasion setting task. Rats with posttraining combined lesions did not retain the ability to perform the tasteless occasion setting task learned preoperatively. Rats with selective lesions of either hippocampus or the amygdala alone were not impaired in the acquisition of the tasteless occasion setting task. The findings suggest that this occasion setting task may be learned by several redundant neural systems. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Biomechanical behaviour of modern human molars: implications for interpreting the fossil record

Three experiments used rats to examine the acquired equivalence or distinctiveness of cues occurring when 2 auditory and 2 visual stimuli were associated with either the same or with different reinforcing outcomes (A1+, A2+, V1*, and V2* vs. A1+, A2*, V1+, and V2*). Subsequent single modality discrimination learning (e.g., A1+, A2-) was assessed in Experiment 1, whereas in Experiment 2, visual and auditory discriminations were tested concurrently (i.e., A1+, A2-, V1-, V2*). In Experiment 3, auditory and visual discriminations (A1+, A2-, V1-, V2*) were trained and then reversed, using either the same (A1-, A2+, V1*, V2-) or different outcomes (A1-, A2*, V1+, V2-) within each stimulus modality. Discriminations were learned more rapidly in these studies when different outcomes were associated with stimuli from the same modality. These results challenge associative mediational theories of acquired equivalence and distinctiveness.     

Recollection is impaired by the modification of interpretation bias.

The interpretation paradigm of cognitive-bias modification (CBM-I) was modified with instructions used in process-dissociation procedures for the purpose of investigating processes contributing to performance on the transfer task. In Experiment 1, nonanxious students were trained to interpret ambiguous situations in either a negative or benign way (or they read nonambiguous scenarios). They were then asked to respond to new ambiguous situations, in the same way as contextually similar analogues during training, or to respond differently. Benign training proactively impaired memory for negative outcomes. This effect was replicated by anxious students in Experiment 2 and discussed with respect to the assumptions underlying process-dissociation procedures and directions for future research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Two kinds of attention in Pavlovian conditioning: Evidence for a hybrid model of learning.

Four appetitive Pavlovian conditioning experiments with rats examined the rate at which the discrimination between compounds AY and AX was solved relative to the discrimination between compounds AY and BY. In Experiments 1 and 2, these discriminations were preceded by training in which A and B were continuously reinforced and X and Y were partially reinforced. Consistent with the Pearce and Hall (1980) model, the results showed that the AY/AX discrimination was solved more readily than the AY/BY discrimination. In Experiments 3 and 4, the discriminations were preceded by feature-positive training in which trials with AX and BY signaled food but trials with X and Y did not. Consistent with the Mackintosh (1975) model, the results showed that the AY/BY discrimination was solved more readily than the AY/AX discrimination. These results are discussed with respect to a hybrid model of conditioning and attention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations

The effects of lesions to the hippocampal system on acquisition of three different configural tasks by rats were tested. Lesions of either the hippocampus (kainic acid/colchicine) or fornix-fimbria (radiofrequency current) were made before training. After recovery from surgery, rats were trained to discriminate between simple and compound-configural cues that signaled the availability or nonavailability of food when a bar was pressed. When positive cues were present, one food pellet could be earned by pressing a lever after a variable time had elapsed. The trial terminated on food delivery (variable interval 15 s). This procedure eliminates some possible alternative explanations of the results of previous experiments on configural learning. Hippocampal lesions increased rates of responding and retarded acquisition of a negative patterning task (A+, B+, AB-); using a ratio measure of discrimination performance these lesions had a milder retarding effect on a biconditional discrimination (AX+, AY-, BY+, BX-), and they had no effect on a conditional context discrimination (X: A+, B-; Y: A-, B+). Fornix-fimbria lesions did not affect acquisition of any of these tasks but increased rates of responding. The results suggest that several task parameters determine the involvement of the hippocampus in configural learning; however, all tasks tested can also be learned to some extent in the absence of an intact hippocampal system, presumably by other learning/memory systems that remain intact following surgery. The lack of effect of fornix-fimbria lesions on any of these tasks suggests that retrohippocampal connections with other brain areas may mediate hippocampal contributions to the learning of some configural tasks. An analysis of these results and of experiments on spatial learning situations suggests that involvement of the hippocampus is a function of the degree to which correct performance depends on a knowledge of relationships among cues in a situation.     

Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.

The transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned stimuli (CSs) and unconditioned stimuli (USs) was examined in four experiments that used Pavlovian appetitive feature negative discrimination training procedures with rats. After training with simultaneous compounds (A+, XA–), X inhibited conditioned responding (CRs) elicited by other CSs and CRs supported by other appetitive USs that had not been involved in discrimination training. After training with serial compounds (A+, X→A–), X's power to set the occasion for nonresponding transferred across CSs and USs only if those events had also been involved in serial feature negative discrimination training. The results supported the suggestion that the acquisition of negative occasion setting involves the representation of individual events in a higher order memory system, separate from that involved in simple association, and that negative occasion setters act only on events that are represented in that system. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Analysis of the content of configural representations: The role of associatively evoked and trace memories.

Two experiments examined the content of configural learning in rats. In Experiment 1, after simple pre-exposure to two hybrid contexts (AB and CD), rats acquired a configural discrimination involving two of the contexts (A and C) and two auditory stimuli (X and Y; AX→food, AY→no food, CX→no food, and CY→food). When rats were then placed in context B, they were more likely to respond to X than Y, and when they were placed in context D the reverse was the case. Experiment 2 demonstrated that rats can acquire a configural discrimination involving the presence of context (A) and its memory trace (a; AX→food, AY→no food, aX→no food, and aY→food). These results show that associatively provoked memories (Experiment 1) and memory traces (Experiment 2) can participate in configural discriminations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning.

Two experiments explored the role of ambiguity on context processing by using relative stimulus validity designs in human predictive learning. Two groups of participants were trained with 2 stimulus compounds (XY and XZ). In Group TD (true discrimination), compound XY was always followed by the outcome, whereas compound XZ was never followed by it. In Group PD (pseudodiscrimination) the presentation of each compound was followed by the outcome in half of the trials. Experiment 1 found that pseudodiscrimination facilitated context dependency of reliable predictors regardless of whether they were trained in the same context in which pseudodiscrimination took place or in an alternative context in which true discrimination was conducted. Experiment 2 found context dependency of reliable predictors trained and tested in PD contexts, suggesting that the ambiguity in the meaning of the cues produced by pseudodiscrimination training is at least partially responsible for the context switch effects found in ambiguous situations in human predictive learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Information integration about object–object relationships by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Three experiments tested the ability to integrate information about object–object relationships in 2 chimpanzees. In Experiment 1, the subjects were trained to match 1 part of a 2-part object to its other part, match a tool to its assembled object, match a container to its tool, and match a tool to its container. In Experiment 2, the subjects were trained to match a picture of the sample. One subject learned this type of matching task and was then tested on whether she could choose the pictures of related items in Experiment 1. Although the subject was reinforced irrespective of her choices, she chose pictures of items related to the sample when there was no picture of the sample. Experiment 3 showed that the subject was able to match a picture of the item among related items. The results suggest that the subject might integrate information about relationships acquired in Experiment 1 and organize it to make networks of related items. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Differential involvement of the basolateral amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens core in the acquisition and use of reward expectancies.

In this study, the authors tested the hypothesis that the basolateral amygdala (BLA), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), nucleus accumbens core (NA-core), and the extended hippocampus mediate different aspects of the development-maintenance of unique reward expectancies produced by the differential outcomes procedure (DOP). Rats were trained with either DOP or a nondifferential outcomes procedure (NOP) on a simple discrimination task. Fornix lesions did not affect either version of the task, demonstrating that the extended hippocampal system has no role in stimulus-outcome (S-O) associations. In contrast, in the DOP condition, BLA lesions impaired performance throughout training, OFC lesions impaired choice accuracy only in the later maintenance phase, and NA-core lesions resulted in enhanced learning. These results suggest that BLA and OFC are important for establishment (BLA) and behavioral maintenance (OFC) of S-O associations, whereas the NA-core is not needed and can in fact impede using multiple S-O associations. No impairments were observed in the NOP condition, demonstrating that these structures are not critical to stimulus-response learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Recovery from blocking between outcomes.

Contemporary associative learning research largely focuses on cue competition phenomena that occur when 2 cues are paired with a common outcome. Little research has been conducted to investigate similar phenomena occurring when a single cue is trained with 2 outcomes. Three conditioned lick suppression experiments with rats assessed whether treatments known to alleviate blocking between cues would also attenuate blocking between outcomes. In Experiment 1, conditioned responding recovered from blocking between outcomes when a long retention interval was interposed between training and testing. Experiment 2 obtained recovery from blocking between outcomes when the blocking outcome was extinguished after the blocking treatment. In Experiment 3, a recovery from blocking between outcomes occurred when a reminder stimulus was presented in a novel context prior to testing. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that blocking of outcomes, like blocking of cues, appears to be caused by a deficit in the expression of an acquired association. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Changes in cue associability across training in human causal learning.

A series of experiments studied the amount learned about two food cues (A and B) whose presentation in a meal was followed by an allergy (+) in a fictitious patient. Participants were trained with A+ and C+ in Phase 1 and then with AB+ or AB++ in Phase 2. Subsequent testing revealed that BC was more allergenic than AD, showing that more had been learned about B than A in Phase 2. Participants were also trained with A+, then with AB+, and finally with AB++. The results of interpolating AB+ between A+ and AB++ training were consistent with the hypothesis that pretraining with Cue A selectively suppressed attention to its associate across the AB+ trials and, thereby, reduced the amount subsequently learned about B on AB++ trials. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The role of interference produced by conflicting associations in contextual control.

In 2 experiments, participants completed a computer task in which they judged the probability of outcomes occurring (e.g., flowers growing, a bug infestation) given cues (e.g., treatment of soil with a fictitious garden product). In each 2-phase experiment, cue X was associated with 1 outcome in Phase 1 and with a 2nd outcome in Phase 2. When the outcome in Phase 1 (e.g., X led to a bug infestation) was replaced in Phase 2 (e.g., X led to flowers growing), contextual control was observed (Experiments 1 and 2). Information learned in each phase was less likely to be retrieved when the cue was tested in a context different from the 1 where training occurred. When the 2nd outcome did not conflict with information acquired in the 1st phase (e.g., X led to flowers and bugs), no contextual control was observed (Experiment 2). Acquiring a 2nd association to X resulted in contextual control only when it conflicted with an association learned earlier. The authors discuss the role of interference produced when conflicting information is acquired in establishing contextual control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)