Enhancement of the H2 desorption properties of LiAlH4 doping with NiCo2O4 nanorods

Lithium aluminum hydride (LiAlH₄) is considered as an attractive candidate for hydrogen storage owing to its favorable thermodynamics and high hydrogen storage capacity. However, its reaction kinetics and thermodynamics have to be improved for the practical application. In our present work, we have systematically investigated the effect of NiCo₂O₄ (NCO) additive on the dehydrogenation properties and microstructure refinement in LiAlH₄. The dehydrogenation kinetics of LiAlH₄ can be significantly increased with the increase of NiCo₂O₄ content and dehydrogenation temperature. The 2 mol% NiCo₂O₄-doped LiAlH₄ (2% NCO–LiAlH₄) exhibits the superior dehydrogenation performances, which releases 4.95 wt% H₂ at 130 °C and 6.47 wt% H₂ at 150 °C within 150 min. In contrast, the undoped LiAlH₄ sample just releases <1 wt% H₂ after 150 min. About 3.7 wt.% of hydrogen can be released from 2% NCO–LiAlH₄ at 90 °C, where total 7.10 wt% of hydrogen is released at 150 °C. Moreover, 2% NCO–LiAlH₄ displayed remarkably reduced activation energy for the dehydrogenation of LiAlH₄.     

Hydrogen desorption properties of MgH2/LiAlH4 composites

The hydrogen desorption properties of MgH₂–LiAlH₄ composites obtained by mechanical milling for different milling times have been investigated by Thermal Desorption Spectroscopy (TDS) and correlated to the sample microstructure and morphology analysed by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The MgH₂–LiAlH₄ composites show improved hydrogen desorption properties in comparison with both as-received and ball-milled MgH₂. Mixing of MgH₂ with small amount of LiAlH₄ (5 wt.%) using short mechanical milling (15 min) shifts, in fact, the hydrogen desorption peak to lower temperature than those observed with both as-received and milled MgH₂ samples. Longer mixing times of the MgH₂–LiAlH₄ composites (30 and 60 min) reduce the catalytic activity of the LiAlH₄ additive as revealed by the shift of the hydrogen desorption peak to higher temperatures.     

Effects of NbF5 addition on the hydrogen storage properties of LiAlH4

We investigated the effects of NbF₅ addition by ball milling on the hydrogen storage properties of LiAlH₄. Pressure-composition-temperature (PCT) experiments showed that addition of 0.5 and 1 mol% NbF₅ in LiAlH₄ improves the onset desorption temperature and results in little decrease in hydrogen capacity, with approximately 7.0 wt% released by 188 °C. Isothermal dehydriding kinetics measurements indicated that the NbF₅-doped sample shows an average dehydrogenation rate 5–6 times faster than that of the as-received LiAlH₄ sample. In the x-ray diffraction results, there are distinct peaks of Al and LiH that appear after desorption. There is no peak of NbF₅ before or after desorption. Desorption kinetics measurements indicated that the activation energy, E_A, for LiAlH₄ + 1 mol% NbF₅ is about 67 kJ/mol for first reaction stage and about 77 kJ/mol for second reaction stage. The desorption process was further characterised by differential scanning calorimetry, and the possible mechanism of the effects of NbF₅ addition is discussed.     

Enhanced hydrogen storage performance of LiAlH4-MgH2-TiF3 composite

The mutual destabilization of LiAlH₄ and MgH₂ in the reactive hydride composite LiAlH₄-MgH₂ is attributed to the formation of intermediate compounds, including Li-Mg and Mg-Al alloys, upon dehydrogenation. TiF₃ was doped into the composite for promoting this interaction and thus enhancing the hydrogen sorption properties. Experimental analysis on the LiAlH₄-MgH₂-TiF₃ composite was performed via temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), isothermal sorption, pressure-composition isotherms (PCI), and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD). For LiAlH₄-MgH₂-TiF₃ composite (mole ratio 1:1:0.05), the dehydrogenation temperature range starts from about 60 °C, which is 100 °C lower than for LiAlH₄-MgH₂. At 300 °C, the LiAlH₄-MgH₂-TiF₃ composite can desorb 2.48 wt% hydrogen in 10 min during its second stage dehydrogenation, corresponding to the decomposition of MgH₂. In contrast, 20 min was required for the LiAlH₄-MgH₂ sample to release so much hydrogen capacity under the same conditions. The hydrogen absorption properties of the LiAlH₄-MgH₂-TiF₃ composite were also improved significantly as compared to the LiAlH₄-MgH₂ composite. A hydrogen absorption capacity of 2.68 wt% under 300 °C and 20 atm H₂ pressure was reached after 5 min in the LiAlH₄-MgH₂-TiF₃ composite, which is larger than that of LiAlH₄-MgH₂ (1.75 wt%). XRD results show that the MgH₂ and LiH were reformed after rehydrogenation.     

Influence of multiple oxide (Cr2O3/Nb2O5) addition on the sorption kinetics of MgH2

The influence of multiple additions of two oxides, Cr₂O₃ and Nb₂O₅, as additives on the hydrogen sorption kinetics of MgH₂ after milling was investigated. We found that the desorption kinetics of MgH₂ were improved more by multiple oxide addition than by single addition. Even for the milled MgH₂ micrometric size powders, the high hydrogen capacity with fast kinetics were achieved for the powders after addition of 0.2 mol% Cr₂O₃ + 1 mol% Nb₂O₅. For this composition, the hydride desorbed about 5 wt.% hydrogen within 20 min and absorbed about 6 wt.% in 5 min at 300 °C. Furthermore, the desorption temperature was decreased by 100 °C, compared to MgH₂ without any oxide addition, and the activation energy for the hydrogen desorption was estimated to be about 185 kJ mol⁻¹, while that for MgH₂ without oxide was about 206 kJ mol⁻¹.     

Combined effects of hydrogen back-pressure and NbF5 addition on the dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation kinetics of the LiBH4–MgH2 composite system

It is well known that the dehydrogenation pathway of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ composite system is highly reliant on whether decomposition is performed under vacuum or a hydrogen back-pressure. In this work, the effects of hydrogen back-pressure and NbF₅ addition on the dehydrogenation kinetics of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ system are studied under either vacuum or hydrogen back-pressure, as well as the subsequent rehydrogenation and cycling. For the pristine sample, faster desorption kinetics was obtained under vacuum, but the performance is compromised by slow absorption kinetics. In contrast, hydrogen back-pressure remarkably promotes the absorption kinetics and increases the reversible hydrogen storage capacity, but with the penalty of much slower desorption kinetics. These drawbacks were overcome after doping with NbF₅, with which the dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation kinetics was significantly improved. In particular, the enhanced kinetics was observed to persist well, even after 9 cycles, in the case of the NbF₅ doped sample under hydrogen back-pressure, as well as the suppression of forming Li₂B₁₂H₁₂. Furthermore, the mechanism that is behind these effects of NbF₅ additive on the reversible dehydrogenation reaction of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ system is discussed.     

Thermal stability of Vale Inco nanonometric nickel as a catalytic additive for magnesium hydride (MgH2)

The structure stability of nanometric-Ni (n-Ni) produced by Vale Inco Ltd. Canada as a catalytic additive for MgH₂ has been investigated. Each n-Ni filament is composed of nearly spherical interconnected particles having a mean diameter of 42 ± 16 nm. After ball milling of the MgH₂ + 5 wt.%n-Ni mixture for 15 min the n-Ni particles are found to be uniformly embedded within the particles of MgH₂ and at their surfaces. Neither during ball milling of the MgH₂ + 5 wt.%n-Ni mixture nor its first decomposition at temperatures of 300, 325, 350 and 375 ^°C the elemental n-Ni reacts with the elemental Mg to form the Mg₂Ni intermetallic phase (and eventually the Mg₂NiH₄ hydride). The n-Ni additive acts as a strong catalyst accelerating the kinetics of desorption. From the Arrhenius and Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov theory the activation energy for the first desorption is determined to be ∼94 kJ/mol. After cycling at 300 ^°C the activation energy for desorption is determined to be ∼99 kJ/mol. This is much lower than ∼160 kJ/mol observed for the undoped and ball milled MgH₂. During cycling at 275 and 300 ^°C the n-Ni additive is converted into Mg₂Ni (Mg₂NiH₄). The newly formed Mg₂NiH₄ has a nanosized grain on the order of 20 nm. Its catalytic potency seems to be similar to its n-Ni precursor. The formation of Mg₂Ni (Mg₂NiH₄) may be one of the factors responsible for the systematic decrease of hydrogen capacity observed upon cycling at 275 and 300 ^°C.     

Effect of Al on the hydrogen storage properties of Mg(BH4)2

The various Mg–B–Al–H systems composed of Mg(BH₄)₂ and different Al-sources (metallic Al, LiAlH₄ and its decomposition products) have been investigated as potential hydrogen storage materials. The role of Al was studied on the dehydrogenation and the rehydrogenation of the systems. The results indicate that the different Al-sources exhibit a similar improving effect on the dehydrogenation properties of Mg(BH₄)₂. Taking the Mg(BH₄)₂ + LiAlH₄ system as an example, at first LiAlH₄ rapidly decomposes into LiH and Al, then Mg(BH₄)₂ decomposes into MgH₂ and B, finally the MgH₂ reacts with Al, LiH and B, which forms Mg₃Al₂ and MgAlB₄. The system starts to desorb H₂ at 140 °C and desorbs 3.6 wt.% H₂ below 300 °C, while individual Mg(BH₄)₂ starts to desorb H₂ at 250 °C and desorbs only 1.3 wt.% H₂ below 300 °C. The isothermal desorption kinetics of the Mg–B–Al–H systems is about 40% faster than that of Mg(BH₄)₂ at the hydrogen desorption ratio of 90%. In addition, the Mg–B–Al–H systems show partial reversibility at moderate temperature and pressure. For Al-added system, the product of rehydrogenation is MgH₂, while for LiAlH₄-added system the product is composed of LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Effect of LiBH4 on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

The effect of lithium borohydride (LiBH₄) on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of magnesium hydride (MgH₂) was investigated. It was found that LiBH₄ played both positive and negative effects on the hydrogen sorption of MgH₂. With 10 mol.% LiBH₄ content, MgH₂–10 mol.% LiBH₄ had superior hydrogen absorption/desorption properties, which could absorb 6.8 wt.% H within 1300 s at 200 °C under 3 MPa H₂ and completed desorption within 740 s at 350 °C. However, with the increasing amount of LiBH₄, the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation kinetics deteriorated, and the starting desorption temperature increased and the hysteresis of the pressure-composition isotherm (PCI) became larger. Our results showed that the positive effect of LiBH₄ was mainly attributed to the more uniform powder mixture with smaller particle size, while the negative effect of LiBH₄ might be caused by the H–H exchange between LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Evaluation of the hydrogen storage behavior of a LiNH2 + MgH2 system with 1:1 ratio

A one-to-one molar ratio of LiNH₂ to MgH₂ was ball milled and characterized to evaluate the proposed hydrogen storage reaction: LiNH₂ + MgH₂ ⇔ LiMgN + 2H₂. The pressure–composition isotherm shows that less than 3.4 wt.% H₂ is released at a plateau pressure near 20 atm at 210 °C. Furthermore, X-ray diffraction show that the products of the reaction include Li₂Mg₂(NH)₃ rather than LiMgN. Combined thermogravimetric and residual gas analyses reveal that large quantities of ammonia are released from the system.     

Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of 4MgH2 + LiAlH4 composite system by doping with Fe2O3 nanopowder

In this paper, the hydrogen storage properties and reaction mechanism of the 4MgH₂ + LiAlH₄ composite system with the addition of Fe₂O₃ nanopowder were investigated. Temperature-programmed-desorption results show that the addition of 5 wt.% Fe₂O₃ to the 4MgH₂ + LiAlH₄ composite system improves the onset desorption temperature to 95 °C and 270 °C for the first two dehydrogenation stage, which is lower 40 °C and 10 °C than the undoped composite. The dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation kinetics of 5 wt.% Fe₂O₃-doped 4MgH₂ + LiAlH₄ composite were also improved significantly as compared to the undoped composite. Differential scanning calorimetry measurements indicate that the enthalpy change in the 4MgH₂–LiAlH₄ composite system was unaffected by the addition of Fe₂O₃ nanopowder. The Kissinger analysis demonstrated that the apparent activation energy of the 4MgH₂ + LiAlH₄ composite (125.6 kJ/mol) was reduced to 117.1 kJ/mol after doping with 5 wt.% Fe₂O₃. Meanwhile, the X-ray diffraction analysis shows the formation of a new phase of Li₂Fe₃O₄ in the doped composite after the dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation process. It is believed that Li₂Fe₃O₄ acts as an actual catalyst in the 4MgH₂ + LiAlH₄ + 5 wt.% Fe₂O₃ composite which may promote the interaction of MgH₂ and LiAlH₄ and thus accelerate the hydrogen sorption performance of the MgH₂ + LiAlH₄ composite system.     

Hydrogen storage properties of destabilized MgH2–Li3AlH6 system

To improve the dehydrogenation properties of MgH₂, a novel hydrogen storage system, MgH₂–Li₃AlH₆, is prepared by mechanochemical milling. Three physical mixtures containing different mole ratios (1:4, 1:1 and 4:1) of MgH₂ and Li₃AlH₆ are studied and there exists a mutual destabilization effect between the components. The last mixture shows a capacity of 6.5 wt% H₂ with the lowest starting temperature of dehydrogenation (170 °C). First, Li₃AlH₆ decomposes into Al, LiH and H₂, and then the as-formed Al can easily destabilize MgH₂ to form the intermetallic compound Mg₁₇Al₁₂ at a temperature of 235 °C, which is about 180 °C lower than the decomposition temperature of pristine MgH₂. Finally, the residual MgH₂ undergoes a self-decomposition whose apparent activation energy has been reduced by about 22 kJ mol⁻¹ compared with pristine MgH₂. At a constant temperature of 250 °C, the mixture can dehydrogenate completely under an initial vacuum and rehydrogenate to form MgH₂ under 2 MPa H₂, showing good cycle stability after the first cycle with a capacity of 4.5 wt% H₂. The comparison between 4 MgH₂ + Li₃AlH₆ and 4 MgH₂ + LiAlH₄ mixtures is also investigated.     

Destabilization effects of Mg(AlH4)2 on MgH2: Improved desorption performances and its reaction mechanism

Both kinetics and thermodynamics properties of MgH₂ are significantly improved by the addition of Mg(AlH₄)₂. The as-prepared MgH₂–Mg(AlH₄)₂ composite displays superior hydrogen desorption performances, which starts to desorb hydrogen at 90 °C, and a total amount of 7.76 wt% hydrogen is released during its decomposition. The enthalpy of MgH₂-relevant desorption is 32.3 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂ in the MgH₂–Mg(AlH₄)₂ composite, obviously decreased than that of pure MgH₂. The dehydriding mechanism of MgH₂–Mg(AlH₄)₂ composite is systematically investigated by using x-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry. Firstly, Mg(AlH₄)₂ decomposes and produces active Al^∗. Subsequently, the in-situ formed Al^∗ reacts with MgH₂ and forms Mg–Al alloys. For its reversibility, the products are fully re-hydrogenated into MgH₂ and Al^∗, under 3 MPa H₂ pressure at 300 °C for 5 h.     

Mixed-metal Li3N-based systems for hydrogen storage: Li3AlN2 and Li3FeN2

The hydrogen storage systems Li₃AlN₂ and Li₃FeN₂ were synthesized mechanochemically by two different routes. In each case an intermediate material formed after milling, which transformed into Li₃MN₂ (M = Al or Fe) upon annealing. The synthesis route had a measurable effect on the hydrogen storage properties of the material: Li₃AlN₂ prepared from hydrogenous starting materials (LiNH₂ and LiAlH₄) performed better than that synthesized from non-hydrogenous materials (Li₃N and AlN). For both Li₃AlN₂ materials, the hydrogen storage capacity and the absorption kinetics improved significantly upon cycling. Ti-doped Li₃AlN₂ synthesized from LiNH₂ and LiAlH₄ showed the best hydrogen storage characteristics of all, with the best kinetics for hydrogen uptake and release, and the highest hydrogen storage capacity of 3.2 wt.%, of which about half was reversible. Meanwhile, Li₃FeN₂ synthesized from Li₃N and Fe displayed similar kinetics to that synthesized from Li₃N and Fe_xN (2 ≤ x ≤ 4), but demonstrated lower gravimetric hydrogen storage capacities. Li₃FeN₂ displayed a hydrogen uptake capacity of 2.7 wt.%, of which about 1.5 wt.% was reversible. For both Li₃AlN₂ and Li₃FeN₂, doping with TiCl₃ resulted in enhancement of hydrogen absorption kinetics. This represents the first study of a ternary lithium-transition metal nitride system for hydrogen storage.     

Effect of LiH on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

Recent works showed that the addition of LiBH₄ significantly improves the sorption kinetics of MgH₂, and LiH decomposed from LiBH₄ was supposed to play the catalytic effect on MgH₂. In order to clarify this mechanism, the effect of LiH on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of MgH₂ was systematically investigated. The hydrogenation kinetics of LiH-doped samples, as well as the morphology after several cycles, was similar to those of pure MgH₂, which indicate that Li⁺ had no catalytic effect on the hydrogenation of Mg. Moreover, the addition of LiH strongly retarded the hydrogen desorption of MgH₂ doped with/without Nb₂O₅, and resulted in higher starting temperature of desorption, larger activation energy and larger pressure hysteresis of PCI curves of MgH₂. H₂, HD and D₂ were observed in the desorption products of MgH₂-2LiD, which confirms that H–H exchange indeed occurs between MgH₂ and LiH, hence deteriorate desorption kinetics/thermodynamics of MgH_2. The results implied that the additives containing H⁻ could retard the hydrogen desorption of MgH₂ by H–H exchange effect.     

Influence of metal oxide on LiBH4/2LiNH2/MgH2 system for hydrogen storage properties

In this study, various nanoscale metal oxide catalysts, such as CeO₂, TiO₂, Fe₂O₃, Co₃O₄, and SiO₂, were added to the LiBH₄/2LiNH₂/MgH₂ system by using high-energy ball milling. Temperature programmed desorption and MS results showed that the Li–Mg–B–N–H/oxide mixtures were able to dehydrogenate at much lower temperatures. The order of the catalytic effect of the studied oxides was Fe₂O₃ > Co₃O₄ > CeO₂ > TiO₂ > SiO₂. The onset dehydrogenation temperature was below 70 °C for the samples doped with Fe₂O₃ and Co₃O₄ with 10 wt.%. More than 5.4 wt.% hydrogen was released at 140 °C. X-ray diffraction indicated that the addition of metal oxides inhibited the formation of Mg(NH₂)₂ during ball milling processes. It is thought that the changing of the ball milling products results from the interaction of oxide ions in metal oxide catalysts with hydrogen atoms in MgH₂. The catalytic effect depends on the activation capability of oxygen species in metal oxides on hydrogen atoms in hydrides.     

Electrochemical intercalation of lithium in the titanium hydrogeno phosphate Ti(HPO4)2·H2O

The electrochemical reactivity of the layered titanium hydrogeno phosphate Ti(HPO₄)₂·H₂O versus lithium has been studied. Lithium intercalation occurs at ∼2.5 V with low polarization, leading to a new lithiated Ti(III) phase, LiTi(HPO₄)₂·H₂O. Ti(HPO₄)₂·H₂O exhibits a reversible capacity of 80 mAh g⁻¹ in the voltage window 1.8–3.5 V at C/10 rate. The stable reversible capacity reveals that the presence of H₂O lattice is not affecting the electrochemical reaction. The reversibility of the reaction is demonstrated by extracting lithium from LiTi(HPO₄)₂·H₂O and the host structure is intact. The electrochemical behaviour of dehydrated phases Ti(HPO₄)₂ and TiP₂O₇ has also been investigated.     

Effect of ball milling time on the hydrogen storage properties of TiF3-doped LiAlH4

In the present work, the catalytic effect of TiF₃ on the dehydrogenation properties of LiAlH₄ has been investigated. Decomposition of LiAlH₄ occurs during ball milling in the presence of 4 mol% TiF₃. Different ball milling times have been used, from 0.5 h to 18 h. With ball milling time increasing, the crystallite sizes of LiAlH₄ get smaller (from 69 nm to 43 nm) and the dehydrogenation temperature becomes lower (from 80 °C to 60 °C). Half an hour ball milling makes the initial dehydrogenation temperature of doped LiAlH₄ reduce to 80 °C, which is 70 °C lower than as-received LiAlH₄. About 5.0 wt.% H₂ can be released from TiF₃-doped LiAlH₄ after 18 h ball milling in the range of 60 °C–145 °C (heating rate 2 °C min⁻¹). TiF₃ probably reacts with LiAlH₄ to form the catalyst, TiAl₃. The mechanochemical and thermochemical reactions have been clarified. However, the rehydrogenation of LiAlH₄/Li₃AlH₆ can not be realized under 95 bar H₂ in the presence of TiF₃ because of their thermodynamic properties.     

Hydrogen storage performance of 5LiBH4 + Mg2FeH6 composite system

The hydrogen storage properties of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ reactive hydride composites for reversible hydrogen storage were investigated by comparing with the 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ composite in the present work. The dehydrogenation pathway and reaction mechanism of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite were also investigated and elucidated. The self-decomposition of Mg₂FeH₆ leads to the in situ formation of Mg and Fe particles on the surface of LiBH₄, resulting in a well dispersion between different reacting phases. The formation of FeB is observed during the dehydrogenation of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite, which might supplies nucleation sites of MgB₂ during the dehydrogenation process, but is not an ascendant catalyst for the self-decomposition of LiBH₄. And FeB can also transform to the LiBH₄ and Fe by reacting with LiH and H₂ during the rehydrogenation process. The dehydrogenation capacity for 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite still gets to 6.5 wt% even after four cycles. The X-ray diffraction analyses reveal the phase transitions during the hydriding and dehydriding cycle. The formed FeB in the composite maintains a nanostructure after four hydriding-dehydriding cycles. The loss of hydrogen storage capacity and de-/rehydrogenation kinetics can be attributed to the incomplete generation of Mg₂FeH₆ during the rehydrogenation process.