Miscibility of poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) with random copolymers of tetramethyl bisphenol-A polyarylate and tetrabromo bisphenol-A polyarylate

Summary Tetramethyl bisphenol-A polyarylate (TMPAR) was miscible with poly(styrene-coacryloni trile) 's(SANs) containing 4, 7, 10, and 13wt% of acrylonitrile(AN) repeating unit. As the content of tetrabromo bisphenol-A polyarylate(TBPAR) repeating unit in the random copolymer of TMPAR and TBPAR was increased, the miscibility window in the blends with SANs was narrowed. The intramolecular repulsion between styrene and AN repeating units in SAN was suggested to be the main driving force for the miscibility of SANs with the random copolymers of TMPAR and TBPAR.     

Miscibility of polyethyloxazoline with thermoplastic polymers

Polyethyloxazoline (PEOx) blends with several other thermoplastic polymers were examined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for miscibility. Styrene/acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers having compositions in the range of about 20–40% acrylonitrile (AN) by weight were found to be miscible with PEOx whereas SANs outside this range were not. The polyhydroxyl ether of bisphenol A (Phenoxy) was also found to be miscible with PEOx. A vinylidene chloride copolymer (Saran) was found to be partially miscible with PEOx, whereas poly(methyl methacrylate) and polycarbonate were not miscible at all.     

Blends of imidized acrylic polymers with SAN copolymers and with PVC

A series of imidized acrylic polymers of varying structural composition generated by reaction of methylamine with poly(methyl methacrylate) were blended with a range of styrene/acrylonitrile or SAN copolymers (0–33% AN) and with poly(vinyl chloride). On the basis of glass transition behavior determined by differential scanning calorimetry, some but not all imidized acrylic structures were found to be miscible with PVC and with SAN copolymers within a limited window of AN levels. Acid functionality in the imidized acrylics appears to hinder their miscibility with SAN rather significantly and with PVC to a lesser extent. Miscible SAN blends showed lower critical solution temperature behavior whereas miscible blends with PVC did not up to the highest attainable temperatures. The composition factors that influence the phase behavior are described and interpreted in terms of possible mechanisms.     

Investigation on the miscibility of the blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The miscibility was investigated in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The 50/50 wt % blends of PMMA with the SAN copolymers containing 5, 35, and 50 wt % of AN were immiscible, while the blend with copolymer containing 25 wt % of AN was miscible. The morphologies of PMMA/SAN blends were characterized by virtue of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the miscibility of PMMA/SAN blends were in consistence with the morphologies observed. Moreover, the different morphologies in blends of PMMA and SAN were also observed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Compatibility behavior in thermoplastic polymer blends containing poly(t-butylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile)

The phase behavior of a series of binary component polymer blends of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(t-butylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile) (TBSAN) containing varying contents of acrylonitrile (AN) was examined to determine the influence of copolymer composition and PCL content on blend miscibility or immiscibility. Thermal measurements were extensively used to determine phase behavior, i.e., a single compositionally dependent glass transition temperature implies blend miscibility. Otherwise, immiscibility is assumed to dominant blend behavior. It was determined that TBSAN and PCL form miscible blends over a broad range of AN content, i.e., spanning from below 43.2 mol % (19.8 wt %) to about 66.4 mol % (39.6 wt %), a range considerably different from that found in poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers. TBSAN-containing blends were found to be immiscible when the AN content is less than about 43 mol % or greater than about 67 mol %. Small-angle light-scattering and polarized light microscopy was used to probe the substantial morphological changes in the miscible blends. Little change was observed in the immiscible blends. These results clarify the phase separation observed in these blend systems. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Miscibility windows in ternary polymer blends of a polyester,polymethacrylate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Miscibility, phase diagrams and morphology of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/poly(benzyl methacrylate) (PBzMA)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ternary blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The miscibility window of PCL/PBzMA/SAN ternary blends is influenced by the acrylonitrile (AN) content in the SAN copolymers. At ambient temperature, the ternary polymer blend is completely miscible within a closed‐loop miscibility window. DSC showed only one glass transition temperature (T_g) for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends; furthermore, OM and SEM results showed that PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 were homogeneous for any composition of the ternary phase diagram. Hence, it demonstrated that miscibility exists for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends, but that the ternary system becomes phase‐separated outside these AN contents. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Studies on miscibility in homopolymer/ random copolymer blends by equation of state theory

The miscibility of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene-acrylonitrile random copolymers (SAN) blends was investigated on the basis of the Flory—Orwoll—Vrij equation of state theory. To obtain the equation of state parameters (P*, V*_sp, T*: characteristic parameters), the pressure—volume—temperature (PVT) behaviour was measured for PMMA and a series of SANs with various acrylonitrile contents. The exchange energy parameter X_ij was also calculated by fitting the theory to some phase diagrams of PMMA/SAN blends. The Flory—Huggins interaction parameter χ was separated into two contributions based on the equation of state theory for mixtures: the exchange energy term χ_inter and the free volume term χ_free. Both the temperature and copolymer composition dependences of χ_inter and χ_free were estimated by calculations using the equation of state parameters. There exists a region in which χ_inter is negative, leading to a miscibility window in PMMA/SAN blends. However, the immiscibility at high temperatures in the blends cannot be explained only by χ_inter; it is caused by the free volume contribution, χ_free. The miscibility window behaviour in PMMA/SAN blends may be explained within the framework of the equation of state theory.     

New miscible blends composed of polysulfone and poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers and their phase behavior

The miscibility of polysulfone, PSf, blend with poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone), PVP, and that of PSf blend with poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers, P(VP-AN), containing various amount of VP were explored. Even though PSf did not formed miscible blends with PVP when both components had high molecular weight, it formed miscible blend with PVP by decreasing molecular weight of PVP. PSf also formed homogeneous mixtures with P(VP-AN) containing AN from 2 to 16 wt%. These miscible blends underwent phase separation on heating caused by LCST-type (lower critical solution temperature-type) phase behavior. The phase separation temperature of miscible blends first increases with AN content, goes through a maximum centered at about 8 wt% AN. Interaction energies of binary pairs involved in blends were evaluated from the observed phase boundaries using the lattice-fluid theory. The decline of the contact angle between water and blend film by increasing P(VP-AN) content in blend indicated that the hydrophobic properties of PSf could be improved by blending with P(VP-AN) copolymers.     

Miscibility of poly(methoxymethyl methacrylate) and poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate) with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) and poly(p-methylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile)

The miscibility of poly(methoxymethyl methacrylate) (PMOMA) and poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate) (PMTMA) with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) and poly(p-methylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile) (pMSAN) was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. PMOMA is miscible with SAN having an acrylonitrile (AN) content around 30 wt %. However, PMOMA is immiscible with any of the pMSAN having AN contents between 9 and 36 wt % and with pMSAN having AN contents between 19 and 34 wt %. The miscibility of the blends enables the evaluation of various segmental interaction parameters.     

Partial miscibility in the system poly(para-chlorostyrene-co-ortho-chlorostyrene)/poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)

The compatibility of random copolymers of para-chlorostyrene and ortho-chlorostyrene (PO copolymers) with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (d.s.c.). Blends prepared by compression moulding of coprecipitated powders display either one or two glass transitions, dependent on the composition of the copolymer component of the blend. PO copolymers of para-chlorostyrene content from 23 to 64% are miscible with PPO in all proportions, using the customary criteria of a single calorimetric glass relaxation and optical clarity. Both homopolymers poly(para-chlorostyrene) (P_pClS) and poly(ortho-chlorostyrene) (P_oClS) are found to be incompatible with PPO; such blends exhibit two glass transitions at temperatures characteristic of the pure component phases. All compatible PO-PPO blends undergo phase separation upon annealing at elevated temperatures, indicating that a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) must exist. The phase separation is found to be reversible by annealing below the LCST, at temperatures which are still above the glass transitions of both blend components.     

Miscibility of copolycarbonate blends with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymer and their interaction energies

The phase behavior of dimethyl polycarbonate-tetramethyl polycarbonate (DMPC-TMPC) blends with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers (SAN) and the interaction energies of binary pairs involved in blend has been explored. DMPC-TMPC copolycarbonates containing 60 wt% TMPC or more were formed miscible blends with SAN containing limited amounts of AN. The miscibility of copolycarbonate with SAN decreases as the DMPC content increases. The miscible blends showed the LCST-type phase behavior or did not phase separate until thermal degradation. The binary interaction energies involved in the miscible blends were calculated from the phase boundaries using the lattice-fluid theory combined with binary interaction model. The phenyl ring substitution with methyl groups did not lead to interactions that are favorable for miscibility with polyacrylonitrile (PAN). The interaction energies of the polycarbonates blends with SAN copolymers as a function of AN content were obtained. It was revealed that the incline of the number of methyl groups on the phenyl rings of bisphenol-A unit acts favorably for the miscibility with SAN copolymer when SAN contains less than about 30 wt% AN and shifts the most favorable interaction to the low AN content.     

Effect of the composition of α-MSAN copolymer on the miscibility of PVC/α-MSAN blends

A series of α-methylstyrene, styrene, and acrylonitrile (α-MSAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents were synthesized by altering α-MSt, St, and AN ratios with emulsion copolymerization method. By melt-blending these copolymers with PVC resin and di-isooctyl phthalate (DOP), PVC/α-MSAN, and PVC/α-MSAN/DOP blends were prepared. The miscibility and morphology of the blends were investigated by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and scanning electron microscopy. The PVC is immiscible with SAN by melt-mixing, whereas PVC is miscible with α-MSAN (α-MSt/St = 1/1) if AN weight percent is within the window range of 20–25 wt %, and α-MSAN (not containing St) with 35 wt % AN is miscible with PVC even when they are blended by melt-mixing. Replacement of styrene with α-methylstyrene widens the miscibility window with PVC. The miscibility of PVC/α-MSAN blends is substantially improved with the increasing α-MSt content in α-MSAN copolymer containing identical AN content. When DOP was introduced into the PVC/α-MSAN (α-MSt/St = 1/1) blends, a single tan δ peak over room temperature in DMA detection is found as AN content in α-MSAN copolymer is within the range of 15–25 wt %, and SEM observation also shows that the blends are homogeneous. When the AN content in α-MSAN copolymer is over 35 wt %, the presence of DOP causes the phase domain extended. The phase domain size of the PVC/α-MSAN/DOP blends intensively depends on AN content in α-MSAN copolymer. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Phase behavior of binary mixtures of styrene/acrylonitrile copolymers and aliphatic polyesters

The phase behavior of binary mixtures of copolymers containing varying amounts of styrene and acrylonitrile (SAN) with a large range of aliphatic polyesters was examined. Miscibility was observed over a limited range of AN contents of the SANs, for each polyester, while similarly for each SAN, miscibility was only observed over a limited range of polyester molecular structures. Thermodynamic interaction parameters for the miscible blends were obtained by analysis of the depression of the polyester melting point. A binary interaction model was used to correlate the data and six group interaction parameters were deduced by subdividing the polyester and SAN copolymer repeating units in three different ways. It is concluded that there is a strong repulsion between the segmental units within the polyesters and within the SAN copolymers, which is an important factor in the observed phase behavior.     

Miscibility of DMPC‐TMPC copolycarbonate/SMMA copolymer blends and their interaction energies of binary pairs involved in blends

The isothermal miscibility map and phase‐separation temperatures caused by lower critical solution temperature‐type phase behavior for blends of poly[2,2,‐propane‐bis{4‐(2‐methyl phenyl)} carbonate]‐poly[2,2,‐propane‐bis{4‐(2,6‐dimethyl phenyl)} carbonate] (DMPC‐TMPC) with poly[(styrene)‐co‐(methyl methacrylate)] (SMMA) copolymers have been determined. SMMA copolymers containing equal to or less than 37 wt% MMA formed miscible blends with DMPC‐TMPC copolycarbonates containing equal to or more than 60 wt% TMPC. The observed phase‐separation temperatures indicate that the miscibility decreases as the DMPC content in DMPC‐TMPC increases, while addition of MMA to the styrene initially increases miscibility with DMPC‐TMPC but ultimately leads to immiscibility. The binary interaction energies involved in these blends were calculated from the phase boundaries using the lattice‐fluid theory combined with the binary interaction model. The spinodal temperatures predicted from the lattice‐fluid theory using the calculated interaction energies are similar to the experimental phase‐separation temperatures. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Miscible blends of poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) and poly(α-methyl styrene-co-acrylonitrile) with hydroxyl-containing polymethacrylates

Poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)(SAN) and poly(α-methyl styrene-co-acrylonitrile)(MSAN) are miscible with poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) and with poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate) (PHPMA). That SAN and MSAN are immiscible with poly(n-propyl methacrylate) and with poly(isopropyl methacrylate) but miscible with PHPMA indicates the enhancement of polymer miscibility due to hydroxyl groups. The miscibility of these blends is explained in terms of recent theories for copolymer/homopolymer blends.     

Miscibility of poly(2-chloroethyl methacrylate) with various polymethacrylates

The miscibility behavior of poly(2-chloroethyl methacrylate) (PCEMA) with various polymethacrylates was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. PCEMA is miscible with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA), and poly(tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate) (PTHFMA), but is immiscible with poly(n-propyl methacrylate), poly(isopropyl methacrylate), poly(n-butyl methacrylate), and poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate). PCEMA/PEMA blends showed lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior but PCEMA/PMMA and PCEMA/PTHFMA blends degraded before phase separation could be induced. The miscibility behavior of PCEMA is similar to that of a chlorinated polymer.     

PVC／ABS共混体系的相容性与形态结构研究

采用种子乳液聚合技术在聚丁二烯（PB）乳胶粒子上接枝共聚苯乙烯（St）、α-甲基苯乙烯（α—MSt）和丙烯腈（AN）单体,合成了一系列不同AN结合量的ABS和α—MABS接枝共聚物。将其与聚氯乙烯（PVC）树脂熔融共混制得了PVC／AtkS共混物,利用扫描电镜（SEM）、透射电镜（TEM）和动态力学分析仪（DMA）对共混物的相容性和相结构进行了表征。结果发现,在PVC／ABS共混体系中,尽管改变接枝SAN共聚物的AN结合量,PVC和ABS接枝共聚物均为不相容体系;在ABS接枝共聚物中引入α-MSt后,当接枝SAN共聚物的AN结合量为18．7％～23．6％（质量分数）时,共混物在室温以上只存在1个tanδ峰,共混物成为相容体系,当AN结合量达到32．1％（质量分数）时,共混物成为部分相容体系。共混物的相区尺寸明显地依赖于接枝SAN共聚物中的AN结合量,与动态力学性能结果表现出良好的吻合。     

Viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) having various acrylonitrile contents

Dynamic viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with various AN contents were measured to evaluate the influence of SAN composition, consequently χ parameter, upon the melt rheology. PMMA/SAN blends were miscible and exhibited a terminal flow region characterized by Newtonian flow, when the acrylonitrile (AN) content of SAN ranges from 10 to 27 wt %. Whereas, PMMA/SAN blends were immiscible and exhibited a long time relaxation, when the AN content in SAN is less than several wt % or greater than 30 wt %. Correspondingly, melt rheology of the blends was characterized by the plots of storage modulus G′ against loss modulus G″. Log G′ versus log G″ plots exhibited a straight line of slope 2 for the miscible blends, but did not show a straight line for the immiscible blends because of their long time relaxation mechanism. The plateau modulus, determined as the storage modulus G′ in the plateau zone at the frequency where tan δ is at maximum, varied linearly with the AN content of SAN irrespective of blend miscibility. This result indicates that the additivity rule holds well for the entanglement molecular weights in miscible PMMA/SAN blends. However, the entanglement molecular weights in immiscible blends should have “apparent” values, because the above method to determine the plateau modulus is not applicable for the immiscible blends. Effect of χ parameter on the plateau modulus of the miscible blends could not be found. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Decreasing miscibility with greater heterogeneity in ternary polymer blend: poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate), poly(α‐methyl styrene) and poly(4‐methyl styrene)

A ternary blend system comprising poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate) (PCHMA), poly(α‐methyl styrene) (PαMS) and poly(4‐methyl styrene) (P4MS) was investigated by thermal analysis, optical and scanning electron microscopy. Ternary phase behaviour was compared with the behaviour for the three constituent binary pairs. This study showed that the ternary blends of PCHMA/PαMS/P4MS in most compositions were miscible, with an apparent glass transition temperature (T_g) and distinct cloud‐point transitions, which were located at lower temperatures than their binary counterparts. However, in a closed‐loop range of compositions roughly near the centre of the triangular phase diagram, some ternary blends displayed phase separation with heterogeneity domains of about 1 µm. Therefore, it is properly concluded that ternary PCHMA/PαMS/P4M is partially miscible with a small closed‐loop immisciblity range, even though all the constituent binary pairs are fully miscible. Thermodynamic backgrounds leading to decreased miscibility and greater heterogeneity in a ternary polymer system in comparison with the binary counterparts are discussed. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) imidization on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The objective of this work was to study the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) and SMA/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with differential scanning calorimetry and small‐angle light scattering techniques. We focused on the effect of SMA partial imidization with aniline on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of these blends. The SMA imidization reaction led to a partially imidized styrene N‐phenyl succinimide copolymer (SMI) with a degree of conversion of 49% and a decomposition temperature higher than that of SMA by about 20°C. We observed that both SMI/PVME and SMI/PMMA blends had lower critical solution temperature behavior. The imidization of SMA increased the phase‐separation temperature of the SMA/PVME blend and decreased that of the SMA/PMMA blend. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008