Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida

The purpose of the present study was to obtain information relating to the types of restorative materials used, the main reason for replacement of restorations, and the age of failed restorations. Dentists in general dental practice in Florida were invited to record details from their own work pertaining to restorations. The diagnostic criteria were described and coded. The clinicians were not calibrated in the use of the criteria but they could call in for further explanation if needed. The 27 clinicians involved placed 2,035 restorations of which 53% were replacements of failed restorations. The increased use of resin based restorative material was clearly evident including posterior composites. The clinical diagnosis secondary caries was the most common reason for replacement of amalgam (56%) and composite (59%) restorations. Only discoloration showed a statistically significant difference in the reason for replacement of the two types of materials. The median age of the replaced amalgam restoration was 15 years and that of composite restoration was 8 years.     

Advanced adhesive restorations: the post-amalgam age

Due to patient demand for biocompatible, safe, and tooth-colored restorations, the use of amalgam as a restorative material has been declining. Currently, the profession of operative dentistry is in a state of transition from the amalgam age to the post-amalgam age. The learning objective of this article is to discuss the current state of the art of tooth-colored restoratives--amalgam substitutes and amalgam alternatives--used either as direct or laboratory fabricated restorations nationally and internationally. Adhesive dentistry is discussed in detail, with tooth preparation as the key element. The challenges facing the clinician during the transition period include clinician education, restorative concepts and teaching competence, costs, prevention, and maintenance.     

Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam

OBJECTIVES: To give the practising dentist scientifically based data to assist him/her in the responsible decision-making process necessary to weigh the options available to the patient if she/he prefers not to have an amalgam placed. DATA SOURCES: Based on the literature and on the research work, which was done in the author's department, the indications and limitations of the known alternatives of amalgam were formulated. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES TO AMALGAM: With the exception of cast gold restorations, all alternatives require the strict use of adhesive techniques. When compared with similar amalgam restorations, placing composite restorations (if they are indicated) takes approximately 2.5 times longer because complex incremental techniques are needed. Despite all the efforts, direct composite restorations placed in large cavities still show unacceptable amounts of marginal openings. Tooth-coloured inlays are a better alternative for large restorations. These restorations must be inserted with adhesive techniques. With composite inlays it is difficult to achieve a composite-composite bond. Ceramic inlays may be micromechanically bonded to the luting composite. They all show clinically a good marginal behaviour and the use of ultrasonic energy may further simplify the application technique of aesthetic inlays. STUDY SELECTION: Papers describing the different techniques were used as a base for the corresponding chapter. To assess and compare the longevity of the different restoration types, literature data were used. We limited ourselves to papers reporting at least 5-year clinical data. Longitudinal, clinically controlled studies were preferred. However, to be more complete, retrospective, cross sectional studies were also included. LONGEVITY OF POSTERIOR RESTORATIONS: Amalgam shows excellent longevity data with studies up to 20 years. The average annual failure rate is 0.3-6.9%. Posterior composites are in the same range (0.5-6.6%), however, the study times are much shorter (max. 10 years). For tooth-coloured inlays much less data are available. Longevity is reported up to 6 years with annual failure rates of 0.6-5%. CONCLUSIONS: All aesthetic alternatives to amalgam require more complex procedures and more time. If cost benefit considerations are a concern, amalgam is still the most convenient restorative material for posterior teeth.     

The epidemiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Greenland 1979-1990: the emergence, spread and disappearance of non-PPNG strains carrying the conjugative 38.9 kb plasmid

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of an amalgam, a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment material and a resin-based composite material used in small Class II cavities in permanent teeth. All restorations were inserted under rubber dam. They were examined yearly for 3 years. One clinician continued the study up to 5 years. The clinical examination focused on two criteria: clinically acceptable and failure. In addition, impressions were taken of the prepared cavities immediately before restoration and at each clinical examination using an elastomeric material. The study comprised 274 Class II restorations (88 amalgams, 95 cerments and 91 resin composites) placed in 142 adolescent patients. One hundred and sixty-seven restorations were in molar and 107 in premolar teeth. Patient dropout after 5 years resulted in the loss of 161 restorations, evenly distributed for restorative material and type of tooth involved. Four amalgam restorations, 22 glass ionomer cerment and nine resin composite restorations failed. The glass ionomer cerment and amalgam restorations failed primarily due to bulk fractures, while the resin composite restorations failed due to secondary caries and bulk fractures.     

Pre-hospitalization management of evolving myocardial infarction. 2d conference of south-eastern region emergency medicine experts

Since the development of advanced adhesive technology, the use of amalgam has declined significantly. The search for amalgam substitutes, i.e., restorative materials which maintain similar clinical function and cost-effectiveness as amalgam, has so far been unsuccessful. It has also become evident that a considerable confusion prevails regarding the objectives of restorative procedures. In absence of national and international standards, the products--the restorations--are assessed according to varied criteria. In placing restorations, three objectives are attained, at most: a) tooth preservation, b) tooth preservation and function, and c) tooth preservation, function, and imperceptible restitution. The learning objective of this article is to discuss the positive effects that could be attained by defining the standards, terminology, and the quality assessment criteria for operative dentistry in regard to the patients and the dental profession.     

Effect of organic peroxide additives on wear resistance of composite resin

The wear resistance of four proprietary posterior composite resins and amalgam were evaluated by an in vitro wear-testing system. Direct and indirect composite restorations were placed on occlusally flattened extracted molars. They were subjected to 400,000 cycles of artificial chewing. The vertical distance between the cavosurface margin and the worn occlusal surface, was measured to indicate the wear resistance of the restorative materials. The restorative systems, including a peroxide modifier, exhibited dramatic increases in wear resistance. The heat-treated composite inlay system exhibited minimal wear values compared to all other composite resins in the study. This system exhibited wear values that were less than those of the amalgam control group.     

The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage

OBJECTIVE: Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations may lead to secondary caries and pulpal damage. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect various cavity liners might have on microleakage. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations with margins on enamel and dentin were treated with different liner materials (an adhesive system, a topical fluoride gel, a cavity varnish, and a glass-ionomer cement) in vitro. Following restoration, the teeth were submitted to thermocycling in a stained solution and sectioned to allow assessment of microleakage. RESULTS: On enamel, the control group (no liner) and the glass-ionomer-lined group had equivalent leakage scores and were superior to every other group. On dentin, only the glass-ionomer specimens had superior performance. The cavity varnish and fluoride-lined specimens exhibited the highest leakage scores. CONCLUSION: The use of liners does not reduce microleakage on amalgam restorations when the cavity margins remain on enamel. On dentin margins, a glass-ionomer liner can reduce microleakage.     

Artificial caries formation around fluoride-releasing restorations in roots

Secondary caries is one of the most important factors leading to replacement of dental restorations. This investigation assessed the capacity of fluoride-releasing restorative materials to resist caries in vitro when used in roots. Class 5 cavities were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 extracted premolars. The six materials used were: glass-ionomer cement (Fuji), glass-ionomer cement with silver particles added (Ketac-silver), fluoride-containing composite resin (Tetric), composite resin (Silux plus), fluoride-containing amalgam (Fluor-Alloy) and high-copper amalgam (Dispersalloy). After 5 weeks in an acid gel for caries-like lesion formation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and examined with polarized light. The results showed that repair with glass-ionomer materials of a carious lesion may be of great importance in the prevention of secondary caries around the restorations in roots.     

The use of a new strain of Vibrio cholerae O139 as a producer of an enteric chemical vaccine

Amalgam remains unchallenged as a posterior restorative material. But its inability to bond to the teeth leads to some amount of microleakage at the restoration-tooth interface with associated problems such as post operative sensitivity, pulpal complications etc. Also a broken amalgam restoration requires replacement which will further weaken the tooth structure. Recently, 4-META has been introduced which can graft amalgam and composite to enamel, dentin and old amalgam restorations. In this study, the bonding and marginal sealing abilities of 4-META was assessed both at the tooth-amalgam interface and old amalgam fresh amalgam interface.     

Effect of topical timolol on tissue circulation in optic nerve head

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether removal of all amalgam restorations might significantly affect mercury levels in plasma and urine and whether the use of rubber dams might reduce patient exposure to mercury during amalgam removal. METHODS: All amalgam restorations were removed from 18 subjects during a single treatment session in which a rubber dam was used and from 10 subjects when a rubber dam was not used. All amalgam restorations were removed by the same dentist using high-speed cutting, water coolant, and high-volume evacuation. The levels of mercury in plasma and urine were analyzed both before and during the subsequent twelve months after amalgam removal. In order to determine whether removal of all amalgam restorations might cause an exposure large enough to significantly increase the mercury levels in two indicator media for mercury exposure, i.e., plasma and urine, and to determine if the removal might cause a significant decrease in the mercury levels found over time, the one-tailed, paired Students' t-test was used. For each individual, the pre-removal levels were compared with both the levels found in plasma on d 1 and in urine on d 10, and also with the levels found 1 y after removal. Furthermore, in order to examine whether the use of rubber dams had any effect on the mercury levels found after removal, the changes in the mercury levels found were compared between the groups using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank sum test. RESULTS: After removal of all amalgam restorations, only the non-rubber dam group showed significant increases in the mercury levels found in plasma (p = 0.012) and urine (p = 0.037). However, one year later, the mercury levels in plasma and urine had sunk significantly below the pre-removal levels for both groups. When the changes in the mercury levels found were compared between the groups, the non-rubber dam group showed a significantly higher increase of mercury in plasma than the rubber dam group the day after removal (p = 0.0010). Compared to the pre-removal mercury levels in plasma and urine, the levels found 1 y after removal of all amalgam restorations were on average 52 +/- 23% (range 4-89%) lower in plasma and 76 +/- 21% (range 20-94%) lower in urine. SIGNIFICANCE: The study showed that dental amalgam had a statistically significant impact on the mercury levels found in plasma and urine in the patients tested, and that the use of a rubber dam during removal of all amalgam restorations significantly reduced the peak of mercury in plasma following removal.     

Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition

The present study focused on the type of restorative material used and the reasons for replacements of restorations in the primary and the young permanent dentition. All patients with restorations and who were 8 and 19 years of age in 1995 and were regularly treated at 11 Public Dental Health clinics in J?nk?ping County, Sweden, participated in the study. Data were extracted from the records for all types of restorations in canines and molars for the preceeding of 5 years for the 8-year-olds (i.e. from 3 to 8 years of age; n = 546) and for approximal restorations in premolars and molars for the preceeding 13 years for the 19-year-olds (i.e. from 6 to 19 years of age; n = 606). In all, 6012 restorations were evaluated. The two most common restorative materials used in the primary dentition were compomer and glass ionomer cement and in the young permanent dentition composite and amalgam. In the primary dentition, 29% of the restorations had been replaced and 4% of the teeth with restorations had been extracted. Thus, 33% of the restorations in the primary dentition failed. The corresponding figure for the young permanent dentition was 13%. The most common reason for replacements in the permanent dentition was secondary caries. That restorations often fail because of caries and that the development of secondary caries is not prevented by replacement of an old restoration indicate that more attention should be paid to preventive dental care for patients with restorations in the primary as well as in the young permanent dentition.     

Dentists' variability in restorative decisions, microscopic and radiographic caries depth

Restorative and dental caries depth decisions were recorded for 5168 un restored approximal tooth surfaces by 17 dentists who worked in the school dental clinics of the North York (Ontario) Public Health Department. Each dentist examined 15 pairs of experimental bitewing radiographs for which true caries depth had previously been determined by microscopy of the sectioned teeth following production of the radiographs. The dentists independently recorded their restorative decisions and radiographic caries depth perceptions. The relationship between the variation in the dentists' restorative decisions and their perceptions of caries depth based on a re-reading of the bitewings on the one hand, and true caries depth on the other was also examined. The percentages of total variability in each dentist's restorative decisions attributable to radiographic and to microscopic caries depth were estimated using regression analyses. Large variations were found among the 17 dentists' distributions of overall restorative and depth decisions. The relationship between microscopic caries depth and the dentists' restorative decisions was, understandably, less strong than that of the dentists radiographic perceptions of caries depth and restorative decisions. Relative to true caries depth, high numbers of false positive and false negative restorative decisions were made. Overall, 50% of the variability in the dentists' restorative decisions was explained by the perceptions of radiographic caries depth; however, among individual dentists, the range was from 29% for one dentist to 69% for another. A much lower percentage of the overall restorative variation was explained by microscopic depth, 18%. Like the finding of the only two previous European studies that quantified the role of radiographs on clinical decisions, this study demonstrated that dentists' perceptions of dental caries depth using bitewing radiographs play a major but variable role in their restorative decisions for approximal tooth surfaces.     

Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study

The purpose of this study was to establish the influence that finishing and polishing of existing amalgam restorations might have on the decision to replace them. Forty extracted teeth, in which amalgam restorations had been placed in vivo, were individually examined by 60 practitioners and students prior to and following standard finishing and polishing procedures. Examiners, who had not been informed of the study's methodology or objective, opted either for maintaining or replacing the restoration in question. The main reasons for replacement were also registered. Finishing and polishing significantly reduced the number of decisions to replace restorations in all groups and for all practitioners. "Appearance" (anatomic shape) was the most frequently cited reason for replacing restorations before finishing and polishing, followed by marginal defects and secondary caries.     

Criteria for restoration replacement and restoration life-span estimates in an educational environment

The present survey assessed the subjective estimates of restoration longevity, the relative importance of the reasons to replace a restoration and the proportion of restorative treatment perceived to be carried out to replace previous restorations in a clinical setting where caries experience has been reported to be high. Three hundred and eight-four final-year dental students in Mexico City (64% female, mean age 23.2 years) made subjective longevity estimates (minimum acceptable, 'average' and ideal) for small and large amalgam restorations and cast restorations. Students attributed greater responsibility for restoration failure to patient-related factors than to dentist-related factors. The most important reasons given for the replacement of restorations were the presence of an active carious lesion and the presence of a lesion. The next most important reasons were the presence of fractured restorations, proximal overhangs or proximal marginal defects, and marginal defects. No marked differences could be detected in the restoration longevity appraisals compared either with other subjective estimations or to actual longevity figures, nor in the relative ranking of reasons to replace restorations between the estimates done by participants in this study and reports originating in low-caries settings.     

The use of implant-supported titanium prostheses for treatment of periodontally compromised patients including functional and orthodontic therapy. Report of 2 cases

Due to its corrosion resistance and biocompatibility, titanium appears to be an alternative material for implant-supported restorations. However, due to technological difficulties, the clinical application of titanium in implant restorations has been limited. Only after recent progress in technology could the clinical use of ceramo-metal titanium restorations be recommended. The therapeutic repertoire for treating patients with missing teeth has been significantly expanded by modern implant methods. Osseointegrated prostheses have become an integral part of restorative therapy also for periodontally compromised dentitions. This article presents 2 case reports for the use of ceramo-metal implant-supported titanium cast prostheses for restorative treatment of periodontally compromised patients requiring comprehensive treatment involving periodontal, functional, orthodontic and prosthodontic therapy. Favourable clinical results have been obtained and a complication-free service of these reconstructions has been documented throughout a 12- to 24-month observation period. These observations suggest that implant-supported ceramo-metal titanium prostheses may be a valuable part of restorative therapy for periodontally compromised dentitions in that they facilitate restorations with optimal biocompatibility. However, controlled clinical studies are needed to establish the long-term serviceability of these titanium restorations.     

Hematological changes in infectious diseases. Hematological consequences of bacterial, protozoal and spirochetal infections (2)

Thirty-six Class V amalgam restorations were placed in 29 patients. Prior to insertion of the amalgam in 12 cavities the walls were treated with Amalgam Liner and in another 12 cavities with Copalite. The remaining 12 cavities were not treated before amalgam insertion. The margin quality was determined quantitatively with the SEM using replicas obtained immediately after the polishing of the restorations and 6 months later. At baseline the cavities treated with Copalite showed a margin quality identical to the untreated cavities. Cavities treated with Amalgam Liner showed an inferior margin quality. After 6 months the margin quality of the three groups showed no statistical differences. With neither of the liners tested was it possible to improve the margin quality of amalgam restorations.     

New England eye care survey

Amalgambond Plus with a high-performance additive was evaluated for its ability to bond a resin composite or an amalgam alloy to deep dentin in primary teeth with nonretentive cavity preparations. The clinical performance of amalgam and resin composite mesio-occlusodistal restorations bonded with Amalgambond Plus was evaluated at 15 months and 2 and 3 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the retention, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and post-operative sensitivity over the times of the evaluation or between amalgam and resin composite restorations. After 3 years, most of the teeth were extracted because it was their exfoliation time, and 29 restorations limited within buccal and lingual cusps were evaluated for marginal leakage. There were no significant differences in microleakage between amalgam and resin composite restorations lined with Amalgambond Plus. Amalgambond Plus has the potential for serving successfully as a cavity liner with either amalgam or resin composite restorations.     

The effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material on artificially demineralised dentine caries in vitro

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent caries is one of the most common reasons for the replacement of restorations. One method of reducing the frequency of this problem may be by using fluoride-releasing restorative materials. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the progression of artificial lesions around resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer) restorations placed in root surfaces. Class V cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal surfaces of 28 human premolar teeth. Artificial carious wall lesions were created in all cavities. The root of each tooth was then hemisected through the middle of the two cavities, before being restored with either the glass ionomer or amalgam, while the opposing cavities on the same root portion were varnished as negative controls. Forty-eight specimens were pH-cycled in remineralising and demineralising solutions for 20 h and 4 h, respectively, each day for 4 weeks, whilst in a smaller control group of eight specimens, the demineralising solution was replaced with deionised water. Mineral changes in the carious lesions were evaluated using contact microradiography. RESULTS: Results showed that varying degrees of subsurface demineralisation and remineralisation were evident, with a laminated appearance in lesions adjacent to the glass ionomer. There was higher remineralisation in the glass ionomer-filled cavities compared with the amalgam-filled cavities. In the water-cycled group, glass ionomer showed an increase in mineral content (p < 0.05), while no changes were observed in the amalgam-filled cavities. CONCLUSIONS: This model has shown that glass ionomer has a greater potential than amalgam for remineralisation of artificially created wall lesions within an acidic environment.     

Management of temporomandibular disorders in a restorative practice

Various disorders related to the masticatory muscles or to the temporomandibular joints may be encountered in a restorative dental practice. Most of them can be managed by the restorative dentist whose primary interest may not lie in the area of temporomandibular disorders. The term temporomandibular disorders is used in this discussion to denote the group of diseases of the masticatory system that involves primarily the temporomandibular joints, the masticatory muscles, and the occlusion of the teeth. The learning objective of this article is to describe temporomandibular disorders encountered in general practice. Managing these disorders in the general practice of restorative dentistry is not difficult and adds to the comfort of the patient and possibly to the success of the restorations.     

Ultrastructural evaluation following catheterization of the fallopian tube with a hysteroscopic catheter

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the in vitro effects of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material on human enamel. METHODS: Enamel specimens were restored with Photac-Fil, a resin-modified glass ionomer; Ketac-Fil, an autopolymerizing glass ionomer and silver amalgam. The samples were pH cycled and then subjected to an artificial caries challenge. Specimens were evaluated by fluoride microdrill biopsy and quantitative microradiography at 1, 2, and 3 mm from restorations. Data on fluoride content, lesion depth, and mineral content were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Student's t test, Neuman-Keuls procedure (multiple [pairwise] comparison), and Pearson's product-moment correlation tests. RESULTS: There were significant differences in fluoride uptake, lesion depth, and mineral density between groups. Significant correlational relationships were also determined. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that Photac-Fil and Ketac-Fil prevent in-vitro demineralization of enamel and suggests different mechanisms of action for each material.