Influence of the polarity of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers on the morphology and mechanical properties of their uncompatibilised blends with polystyrene

Rubber‐toughened polystyrene has been extensively studied and is a well‐established technology. However, the use of thermoplastic elastomers to toughen polystyrene (PS) is new and has the potential for further investigations. In the present study, three EVAs (ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers) with identical melt flow indices (MFIs), of ～2.5 dgmin^?1, but different vinyl acetate (VA) contents, of 9.3 wt% (EVA760), 18.0 wt% (EVA460) and 28.0 wt% (EVA265), were melt blended with PS at 180 °C, and various ASTM test pieces were injection moulded at 200 °C. The polarity of the dispersed phase (ie EVA), has a significant effect on the mechanical properties of the blends. Both mechanical and rheological studies reveal that the uncompatibilised PS/EVA265 blends exhibit some degree of compatibility when the amount of EVA265 is lower than 30 wt%. These results indicate that EVA265 with the highest VA content is the most effective impact modifier for PS. The results clearly show that increasing the VA content in EVA increases the polarity of the dispersed phase, approaching that of the matrix (ie PS) and subsequently improving the compatibility between the two phases in terms of interfacial adhesion. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Toughening effects of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers with different vinyl acetate content and viscosity on nylon 1010 blends

Nylon 1010 blends with ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) and maleated ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MAH) were prepared through melt blending. The vinyl acetate (VA) content and viscosity of EVA significantly affected the notched impact strength of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends. The nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH blends with high notched impact strength (over 60 kJ/m²) were obtained when the VA content in EVA ranged from 28 to 60 wt%. The effect of VA content on the notched impact strength of blends was related to the glass transition temperature for EVA with high VA content and crystallinity for EVA with low VA content. For nylon blends with EVA with the same VA content, low viscosity of EVA led to high notched impact strength. Fracture morphology of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends showed that blends with ductile fracture behavior usually had large matrix plastic deformation, which was the main energy dissipation mechanism. A relationship between the notched impact strength and the morphology of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends was well correlated by the interparticle distance model. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Cocontinuous morphologies in polystyrene/ethylene–vinyl acetate blends: The influence of the processing temperature

The influence of the compression‐molding temperature on the range of cocontinuity in polystyrene (PS)/ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer blends was studied. The blends presented a broad range of cocontinuity when compression‐molded at 160°C, and they became narrower when compression‐molded at higher temperatures. A coarsening effect was observed in PS/EVA (60:40 vol %) blends upon compression molding at higher temperature with an increase in the phase size of the cocontinuous structure. Concerning PS/EVA (40:60 vol %) blends, an increase in the mixing and molding temperatures resulted in a change from a cocontinuous morphology to a droplet–matrix morphology. This effect was observed by selective extraction experiments and scanning electron microscopy. The changes in the morphology with the molding conditions affected the storage modulus. An increase in the storage modulus in blends compression‐molded at 160°C was observed as a result of dual‐phase continuity. An EVA copolymer with a higher vinyl acetate content (28 wt %) and a higher melt‐flow index resulted in blends with a broader range of cocontinuity. This effect was more pronounced in blends with lower amounts of PS, that is, when EVA formed the matrix. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 386–398, 2003     

Rheological and mechanical properties of compatibilized polystyrene/ethylene vinyl acetate blends

In this study, a blend of polystyrene (PS)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) (PS/EVA, 90 : 10 wt %) was compatibilized with three different block copolymers, in which their end blocks were compatible with either styrene or EVA. The compatibilized blends with different compositions were prepared using a twin‐screw extruder and injection molded into the required test specimens. Mechanical properties of the blends, such as tensile properties and Charpy impact strength, morphology of tensile fractured surfaces, rheological properties, and thermal properties, were investigated. The results show that the interaction between the dispersed and continuous phase can be improved by the addition of a compatibilizer. Appreciable improvement in the impact strength of the blend with 15 wt % of compatibilizer C (polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene) was observed. Its mechanical properties are comparable to those of the commercial high‐impact polystyrene, STYRON 470. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 2071–2082, 2004     

Effect of the elastomer type on the microstructure and mechanical properties of polypropylene

In this study, the effects of the elastomer type—ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM), three kinds of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA 9, EVA 18, and EVA 28, where the number is the vinyl acetate concentration), and styrene–butadiene–styrene—and content on the microstructure and mechanical and thermal properties of isotactic polypropylene (i‐PP) blends were investigated. Five different elastomer concentrations (3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt %) were added to i‐PP to produce polypropylene/elastomer blends. The yield and tensile strengths, elastic modulus, impact strength, hardness, melt flow index (MFI), and structural properties of the blends were investigated. The tensile and yield strengths, elastic modulus, and hardness decreased gradually, whereas the impact strength and MFI increased as the elastomer content increased. As a result, with respect to the impact strength, the most effective elastomers were EPDM with 15 wt % and EVA 28 with 15 wt % for higher impact strength values. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 1445–1450, 2005     

Poly(methyl methacrylate) toughened by ethylene‐vinyl acetate copolymer: Physico‐mechanical,thermal, and chemical properties

Blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with different composition viz., 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt % of ethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer were prepared by extrusion in a corotating twin screw extruder. These prepared PMMA/EVA blends have been characterized for physicomechanical properties such as density, surface hardness, izod impact strength, tensile strength, tensile elongation, and tensile modulus. The chemical aging and heat aging tests were performed on the blends by exposing them to different chemical environments and to 80°C for 168 h respectively. The influence of chemical aging and heat ageing on the mechanical performance of PMMA/EVA blends has been studied. The PMMA/EVA blends were also characterized for thermal properties such as vicat softening point (VSP) and melt flow index (MFI). That means significant improvement in impact strength of PMMA was noticed after incorporation of EVA into PMMA matrix and it lies in the range 19.1–31.96 J/m. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Compatibility of low‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) binary blends prepared by melt mixing

The compatibility of low‐density polyethylene and poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) containing 18 wt % vinyl acetate units (EVA‐18) was studied. For this purpose, a series of different blends containing 25, 50, or 75 wt % EVA‐18 were prepared by melt mixing with a single‐screw extruder. For each composition, three different sets of blends were prepared, which corresponded to the three different temperatures used in the metering section and the die of the extruder (140, 160, and 180°C), at a screw rotation speed of 42 rpm. Blends that contained 25 wt % EVA‐18 were also prepared through mixing at 140, 160, or 180°C but at a screw speed of 69 rpm. A study of the blends by differential scanning calorimetry showed that all the prepared blends were heterogeneous, except that containing 75 wt % EVA‐18 and prepared at 180°C. However, because of the high interfacial adhesion, a fine dispersion of the minor component in the polymer matrix was observed for all the studied blends with scanning electron microscopy. The tensile strengths and elongations at break of the blends lay between the corresponding values of the two polymers. The absence of any minimum in the mechanical properties was strong evidence that the two polymers were compatible over the whole range of composition. The thermal shrinkage of the blends at various temperatures depended mainly on the temperature and EVA‐18 content. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 841–852, 2003     

Toughening and compatibilization of polypropylene/polyamide‐6 blends with a maleated–grafted ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate

In this article, maleated–grafted ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MA) was used as the interfacial modifier for polypropylene/polyamide‐6 (PP/PA6) blends, and effects of its concentration on the mechanical properties and the morphology of blends were investigated. It was found that the addition of EVA‐g‐MA improved the compatibility between PP and PA6 and resulted in a finer dispersion of dispersed PA6 phase. In comparison with uncompatibilized PP/PA6 blend, a significant reduction in the size of dispersed PA6 domain was observed. Toluene‐etched micrographs confirmed the formation of interfacial copolymers. Mechanical measurement revealed that the addition of EVA‐g‐MA markedly improved the impact toughness of PP/PA6 blend. Fractograph micrographs revealed that matrix shear yielding began to occur when EVA‐g‐MA concentration was increased upto 18 wt %. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99:3300–3307, 2006     

Thermal and mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) and ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer blends

A series of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends have been prepared with different compositions viz., 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt % ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer by melt blending method in Haake Rheocord. The effect of different compositions of EVA on the physico‐mechanical and thermal properties of PMMA and EVA copolymer blends have been studied. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) has been employed to investigate the phase behavior of PMMA/EVA blends from the point of view of component specific interactions, molecular motions and morphology. The resulting morphologies of the various blends also studied by optical microscope. The DSC analysis indicates the phase separation between the PMMA matrix and EVA domains. The impact strength analysis revealed a substantial increase in impact strength from 19 to 32 J/m. The TGA analysis reveals the reduction in onset of thermal degradation temperature of PMMA with increase in EVA component of the blend. The optical microscope photographs have demonstrated the PMMA/EVA system had a microphase separated structure consisting of dispersed EVA domains within a continuous PMMA matrix. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Studies on miscibility of blends of poly (ethylene acrylic acid) and ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate by melt rheology

Rheological behavior of blends of poly (ethylene‐acrylic acid) (EAA) and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer have been carried out at various temperatures, namely, 100, 110, and 120°C, and different shear rates from 61.33 to 613.30 s^?1 using a Monsanto Processability Tester. The melt viscosity of the blends shows synergism during processing. The activation energy of the blends is in the range 20.7–44.6 kJ/mol. Highest activation energy was observed for the blends containing 40–60% of EVA by weight. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 1947–1954, 2005     

Effect of electron beam irradiation and vinyl acetate content on the physicochemical properties of LDPE/EVA blends

The radiation‐induced crosslinking, compatibility, and surface modification of low density polyethylene/ethylene vinyl acetate blends (LDPE/EVA) were investigated. The structural and physical properties were characterized in terms of gel content, hot set, mechanical properties, contact angle, and surface free energy. The highest crosslink density was obtained at 20 wt % of EVA. Gel content of LDPE/EVA blends was increased with increasing irradiation dose, vinyl acetate (VA), and EVA contents. The hot set results are consistent with the gel content data. Mechanical testing showed that the tensile strength of samples increased with increasing irradiation dose up to 180 kGy, whereas the elongation at break was decreased with increasing irradiation dose. Contact angle measurements showed that the surface hydrophillicity of LDPE blend was increased with increasing irradiation dose and contents of both VA and EVA. The surface free energy was greatly dependent on irradiation dose and content of both VA and EVA. The total surface free energies of different LDPE formulations were in the range 17.25–32.51 mN/m, in which the polar (^pσ) and disperse (^dσ_s) values were within the range 16.52–26.6 and 0.9–5.91 mN/m, respectively. In conclusion, electron beam irradiation and blending LDPE with EVA improved the wettability or adhesion properties of LDPE/EVA blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Thermal and mechanical properties of uncrosslinked and chemically crosslinked polyethylene/ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer blends

Uncrosslinked and chemically crosslinked binary blends of low‐ and high‐density polyethylene (PE), with ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), were prepared by a melt‐mixing process using 0–3 wt % tert‐butyl cumyl peroxide (BCUP). The uncrosslinked blends revealed two distinct unchanged melting peaks corresponding to the individual components of the blends, but with a reduced overall degree of crystallinity. The crosslinking further reduced crystallinity, but enhanced compatibility between EVA and polyethylene, with LDPE being more compatible than HDPE. Blended with 20 wt % EVA, the EVA melting peak was almost disappeared after the addition of BCUP, and only the corresponding PE melting point was observed at a lowered temperature. But blended with 40% EVA, two peaks still existed with a slight shift toward lower temperatures. Changes of mechanical properties with blending ratio, crosslinking, and temperature had been dominated by the extent of crystallinity, crosslinking degree, and morphology of the blend. A good correlation was observed between elongation‐at‐break and morphological properties. The blends with higher level of compatibility showed less deviation from the additive rule of mixtures. The deviation became more pronounced for HDPE/EVA blends in the phase inversion region, while an opposite trend was observed for LDPE/EVA blends with co‐continuous morphology. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3261–3270, 2007     

Mechanical properties of ethylene–vinyl acetate/polystyrene blends studied by in situ polymerization

This study examined ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA)‐toughened polystyrene (PS). EVA is well‐known to be incompatible with PS; thus, the PS graft to the EVA backbone (EVA‐g‐PS) was used as a compatibilizer and provided good adhesion at the interface of PS and EVA. In addition, the mechanical properties and impact resistance of the PS matrix were obviously improved by EVA‐g‐PS and by EVA itself. Meanwhile, differential scanning calorimetry results showed that the grafted PS chain influenced the crystallization of EVA; for example, the melting temperature, the crystallization temperature, and the percentage crystallinity related to EVA were reduced. Moreover, the addition of 10% EVA increased the impact strength by a factor of five but reduced the modulus by the same factor. Additionally, a lower number‐average molecular weight EVA delayed phase inversion and resulted in poor mechanical properties. A fracture surface photograph revealed that the major mechanism of EVA‐toughened PS was craze and local matrix deformation. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 699–705, 2003     

High‐resolution solid‐state NMR and SEM study of the interaction behavior of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends

Binary blends formed by two types of ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate (EVA), which have different vinyl acetate contents, and poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) were prepared in a Haake Rheocord 9000 plastograph. A series of samples were obtained varying the PVAc amount up to 50%. The studies were carried out employing solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). The xenon‐129 (¹²⁹Xe) and carbon‐13 (¹³C) NMR response together with the microscopy results showed that the systems are heterogeneous. Therefore, EVA with a higher vinyl acetate content presented some interaction between the polymer blend components. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 116–124, 2002     

Influence of crosslinking on crystallization,rheological, and mechanical behaviors of high density polyethylene/ethylene‐vinyl acetate copolymer blends

High density polyethylene (HDPE)/ethylene‐vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) blends with selective crosslinking the EVA phase were prepared and the crystallization, rheological, and mechanical behaviors were studied. Selective crosslinking of EVA component could greatly improve both tensile and impact strengths of the HDPE‐rich blends and influence melting enthalpy at different annealing temperature in successive self‐nucleation and annealing procedure. Dynamic mechanical analysis reveals that glass transition temperatures of both the HDPE and EVA components are lowered upon blending and are raised upon crosslinking. The uncrosslinked HDPE/EVA blends are unstable in the melt and show increment in storage modulus (G′) and decay in loss tangent (tanδ) with annealing time associated with phase coarsening. However, morphology of selectively crosslinked blends in the melt state is highly unstable, characterized by a fast migration of uncrosslinked HDPE component out of the crosslinked EVA phase to the surface resulting in a rapid decay in G′ and an increment in tanδ at the early stage of annealing. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 54:2848–2858, 2014. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Melt rheology and elasticity of natural rubber—ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer blends

The melt rheology of blends of natural rubber (NR) and ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) has been studied with reference to the effects of blend ratio, cross-linking systems, shear stress, and temperature. When EVA formed the dispersed phase, the viscosity of the blends was found to be a nonadditive function of the viscosities of the component polymers at lower shear region, i.e., a positive deviation was observed. This behavior has been explained based on structural buildup of dispersed EVA domains in the continuous NR matrix. The effect of the addition of silica filler on the flow characteristics of the blends has been investigated. The melt elasticity parameters such as die swell, principal normal stress difference, recoverable shear strain, and elastic shear modulus of NR–EVA blends were also evaluated. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Influence of ethylene vinyl acetate on the spinnability and mechanical properties of poly(propylene)/zeolite‐Ag blend fibers

The spinnability and mechanical properties of poly(propylene) (PP)/zeolite‐supported Ag⁺ (zeolite‐Ag)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) ternary blend fibers were studied. It was found that the spinning temperature of the ternary blend fibers was decreased in the presence of EVA. The addition of 2 wt % EVA substantially improved the spinnability of the blend system by enhancing its flowability. It was also found that the ternary fiber with EVA₂₈ (28 wt % vinyl acetate content) showed balanced improvement of mechanical properties by a concomitant increase in modulus and tensile strength. The improvements of spinnability and mechanical properties suggested that a core–shell structure of zeolite‐Ag/EVA₂₈ particles, with zeolite‐Ag as the core and EVA₂₈ as the shell, was formed and remained during the melt‐mixing process of the blended chips and during the course of fiber processing. EVA probably enhanced the binding between the zeolite‐Ag and the PP matrix, as made evident in SEM microphotographs. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 96: 1460–1466, 2005     

Morphology and mechanical properties of reactive compatibilized polystyrene/ethylene‐vinyl acetate‐vinyl alcohol blends

A reactive compatibilizer, styrene‐maleic anhydride (SMA) was used to compatibilize the blends of polystyrene (PS) and ethylene‐vinyl acetate‐vinyl alcohol (EVAOH), which was synthesized from ethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA) using transesterification reaction. The compatibilized blends with different compositions were prepared using a twin‐screw extruder and injection molded into the required test specimens. Morphology of Charpy impact‐fractured surfaces, tensile, and impact properties of the blends were investigated. Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was also applied for specific samples to elucidate the presence of the functional groups reaction necessary for reactive compatibilization. The results of the ternary PS/EVAOH/SMA blends illustrate that the addition of SMA as a compatibilizer slightly reduce the elongation at break. From the impact‐fractured surfaces of the blends, it is evident that the morphology developed sizable pores when SMA was added into the blends. This might be attributed to the residual octanol‐1, produced from the synthesis of EVAOH, as there is a possibility of a reaction between hydroxyl groups in the octanol‐1 and the anhydride groups in the SMA. This disrupted the stability of the morphology and resulted in the decrease in the elongation, and hence, the tensile toughness. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 209–217, 2002     

Melt grafting of poly(ethylene‐vinyl acetate) copolymer with maleic anhydride

Poly(ethylene‐vinyl acetate) (EVA) copolymer was melt grafted with maleic anhydride (MAH) in a twin screw extruder in the presence of peroxide. It is confirmed that MAH has been melt grafted on the backbone of EVA by FTIR using the method of hydrolysis. The NMR analysis suggests that the grafting reaction occurs on the tertiary carbon of main chain of EVA other than the methyl moiety of vinyl acetate (VA) group. The incorporation of VA groups onto the matrix shows a competitive effect on the grafting. The existence of VA groups promotes the extent of MAH graft onto EVA; nevertheless, it also weakens the crystallizability of main chain. When the content of peroxide initiator is 0.1 wt % based on the polymer matrix, the grafting degree increases with increasing the concentration of monomer. When the peroxide content is higher than 0.1 wt %, side reactions such as crosslinking or disproportionation will be introduced into this system. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 841–846, 2006     

Processing and properties of an ethylene–vinyl acetate blend foam incorporating ethylene–vinyl acetate and polyurethane waste foams

Waste polyurethane foam (w‐PU) and waste ethylene–vinyl acetate foam (w‐EVA) were used as fillers for the production of an ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA) blend foam. Two different foaming techniques (single‐stage and heat–chill processes) were used for this purpose. The waste foam concentration was varied up to 30 wt % of the original EVA. The physical, mechanical, and morphological properties of the filled foam were studied. The single‐stage process produced blend foams with a lower density and a greater cell size than the foams obtained by the heat–chill process. The density and compression strength of the blend foam increased as the percentage of w‐PU foam increased. However, for the w‐EVA/EVA blend foams, the addition of w‐EVA foam did not significantly affect the density or compression strength compared to the original EVA foams. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 44708.