Immunochemical particularities of anaphylactic reactions to compounds used in anesthesia

Three adult mini-pigs were employed to assess the effects of a twice daily dosage (40 mg kg-1) of oxytetracycline hydrochloride (OTC) and a combination of OTC with (0.5 mg kg-1) bromhexine hydrochloride (BHC) on the rheological properties and wet weight of secreted tracheal mucus. Mucus was collected daily from open-ended tracheal pouches established surgically in the mini-pigs. After a five day control period, either OTC or OTC plus BHC was administered twice daily with the normal diet. Each study period was followed by a five day washout period when mucus was collected but no drug given. The viscoelastic properties of each mucus sample were determined using creep compliance analysis. OTC was shown to increase the residual shear viscosity IP < 0.01) and increase the instantaneous compliance (P < 0.01). An increase in the wet weight of the collected mucus occurred in one pig only (P < 0.01). When BHC was co-administered with OTC, all of these changes were abolished. Evidence was obtained to suggest that BHC increased the concentration of OTC within the secreted mucus. BHC appeared to reverse the mucospissic activity of OTC in-vivo.     

Lack of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression with once-daily or twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray administered to patients with allergic rhinitis

The potential for a newly developed, double-strength (0.084%) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aqueous (AQ) nasal suspension to produce effects associated with exposure to systemic corticosteroids was assessed by the plasma cortisol response to cosyntropin stimulation induced by a 6-hour intravenous infusion of 250 micrograms of cosyntropin in 500 mL of normal saline. Sixty-four patients with allergic rhinitis were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four treatment groups: (1) BDP AQ Forte (0.084%) nasal spray 336 micrograms once daily; (2) BDP AQ (0.042%) nasal spray 168 micrograms twice daily; (3) placebo nasal spray twice daily; or (4) oral prednisone 10 mg once daily in the morning. After 36 consecutive days of treatment, there was a significant (P < 0.01) difference in the plasma cortisol response to cosyntropin stimulation between the prednisone and placebo groups; however, there were no significant differences between the BDP AQ Forte or the BDP AQ groups compared with the placebo group. Secondary analyses comparing BDP AQ Forte administered as 336 micrograms once daily with BDP AQ administered as 168 micrograms twice daily showed no significant differences in plasma cortisol responses to cosyntropin stimulation. No serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events consisted of headache, pharyngitis, or nasal irritation, with headache being reported most frequently. These adverse events were similarly distributed among active treatment groups and were similar to placebo. No clinically relevant changes were observed in any treatment group in findings on clinical laboratory tests, physical examination, or electrocardiography. Vital signs, obtained daily, were consistent with values observed in healthy individuals. No patient exhibited signs of oral candidiasis. All patients met the plasma cortisol concentration criteria for discharge relative to expected hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in plasma cortisol responses to cosyntropin stimulation between groups of patients with allergic rhinitis treated with either BDP AQ Forte (0.084%) nasal spray 336 micrograms once daily or BDP AQ (0.042%) nasal spray 168 micrograms twice daily compared with the placebo group. These results indicate that the dosing regimens of BDP AQ nasal suspensions used in this study lack systemic effects and are safe and well tolerated.     

Controlled study of fluconazole in the prevention of fungal infections in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies and bone marrow transplant recipients

The efficacy and safety of oral fluconazole versus a polyene regimen in preventing mycoses in neutropenic patients was compared. Patients with haematological malignancy or bone marrow transplantation received as antifungal prophylaxis either fluconazole 200 mg daily or a regimen consisting of clotrimazole trouches 10 mg twice daily with mycostatin, 500,000 I.U. four times daily, benadryl and cepacol mouthwash. Ninety patients at risk for fungus infection were evaluable. Four of 42 patients (9.5%; confidence interval 2%-23%) on fluconazole and 17 of 48 patients (35.4%; confidence interval 22%-52%) (p < 0.01) on the clotrimazole regimen developed a clinically significant fungal infection, including 3 (7.1%) and 11 (22.9%) patients respectively who had severe fungal infection, mainly pulmonary aspergillosis. Death directly due to a fungal infection within 100 days of the start of prophylaxis occurred in 2 of 42 patients (4.8%) and 9 of 48 patients (18.8%) respectively (p < 0.06). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the chance of survival on fluconazole was statistically greater than for the clotrimazole regimen (p < 0.04). A decrease of candidal colonisation of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts occurred only in patients receiving fluconazole. No significant toxicity occurred. A 200 mg daily dose of fluconazole given to these patients thus appears to be well tolerated and to provide a protective effect against the development of fungal infection and death from severe fungal disease.     

Salmeterol compared with slow-release terbutaline in nocturnal asthma. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, sequential clinical trial. French Multicenter Study Group

The aim of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group clinical trial with a 2-week treatment period was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) with slow-release (SR) terbutaline (5 mg orally, twice daily) in nocturnal asthma. A total of 159 asthmatic adults (FEV, 50-90% of predicted value; sex ratio: 0.87) with at least two nocturnal awakenings during a 7-d run-in period was included in the study. Patients were centrally randomized with a national computer network (Minitel). The main variable (number of awakening-free nights during the last week of treatment) was analyzed according to a sequential method with the one-sided triangular test. The number of awakening-free nights (+/- SD) was significantly higher in the salmeterol group: 5.3 +/- 2.4 vs 4.6 +/- 2.3 (P = 0.006). Salmeterol was significantly more effective than SR-terbutaline in the following factors: number of patients without any awakening during the last week of treatment (50% vs 27%, P = 0.003), mean morning PEF (351 +/- 109 l/min-1 vs 332 +/- 105 l/min-1, P = 0.04), PEF diurnal variation 6 +/- 10% vs 11 +/- 12%, P = 0.01), overall assessment of efficacy by the patient and the investigator (P = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively), and daily rescue salbutamol intakes (P = 0.004). In the salmeterol group, significantly fewer patients reported adverse events (16% vs 29%, P = 0.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Salmeterol xinafoate as maintenance therapy compared with albuterol in patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, with that of albuterol, a short-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist, in the treatment of asthma. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Eleven outpatient clinical centers. SUBJECTS: A total of 322 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with chronic symptomatic asthma requiring daily therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with salmeterol xinafoate (42 micrograms inhaled twice daily), albuterol (180 micrograms inhaled four times daily), or placebo (four times a day) for 12 weeks; patients in all three groups could use inhaled albuterol as backup medication for breakthrough symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serial 12-hour forced expiratory flow in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings due to asthma, episodes of asthma exacerbations, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: The mean area under the curve for FEV1 throughout each 12-hour period was consistently greater after a single dose of salmeterol than after two doses of albuterol administered 6 hours apart (P < .001), with the difference ranging from 3.1 to 4.3 L.h. Salmeterol produced an average increase in morning and evening PEF of 26 and 29 L/min, respectively, over pretreatment values compared with decreases of -13 and -3 L/min, respectively, in the albuterol group and -2 L/min both in the morning and evening in the placebo group (P < .001). Patients in the salmeterol group had significantly fewer days and nights with symptoms than did either the albuterol or placebo group (P < .001). Responses to salmeterol were similar at day 1 and at week 12. Adverse events in all treatment groups were equally infrequent, and no clinically significant change in cardiac rhythm was observed with salmeterol treatment. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol inhaled twice daily is more effective than albuterol inhaled four times a day (or as needed) in patients with asthma requiring maintenance therapy. No deterioration of asthma control was observed with the use of salmeterol over a 3-month period.     

A randomized comparative study on the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and erythromycin in treating community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin, a new macrolide, has distinct microbiological and pharmacokinetic advantages compared with erythromycin. This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and erythromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: Forty adult patients, diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, were randomly arranged to received either clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily (20 patients) or erythromycin 500 mg four times daily (20 patients), over a period of 14 days each. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of clinical cure (65% for clarithromycin, 65% for erythromycin), clinical success (clinical cure and improvement: 95% for clarithromycin, 90% for erythromycin) and radiological response (95% for clarithromycin, 90% for erythromycin). However, adverse effects, mainly gastrointestinal, were significantly higher among patients treated with erythromycin than among patients treated with clarithromycion (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily is at least as effective as erythromycin 500 mg four times daily for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, and is much better tolerated.     

Once-daily administration of didanosine in combination with anti-retroviral zidovudine in previously untreated patients]

25 HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive adults were included in a 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of a zidovudine/didanosine combination therapy in which didanosine was administered once daily (200 mg if weight < 60 kg, 300 mg if weight > 60 kg) and zidovudine twice daily (500 mg/day if weight < 90 kg, 600 mg/day if weight > 90 kg). 5 patients discontinued their treatment early: 3 had poor compliance and 2 presented adverse events. Evaluation of treatment efficacy was based on CD4+ T cell enumeration and HIV RNA level quantitation in plasma (NASBA). Baseline values were 278 CD4+/mm3 and 5.42 log RNA copies/ml. Mean changes from baseline were +102 CD4+/mm3 and -2.14 log RNA copies/ml at week 8 and +156 CD4+/mm3 and -2.07 log RNA copies/ml at week 24. HIV RNA in plasma was lower than the detection limit (2.60 log RNA copies/ml) in 55% of patients at week 8 and in 30% at week 24. No major adverse events such as neuropathy or pancreatitis were observed. Once-daily administration of didanosine in combination with twice-daily administration of zidovudine is a well tolerated regimen that appears to be as effective ad the conventional zidovudine/didanosine combination regimen.     

Efficacy of home cervical traction therapy

Cervical traction is administered by various techniques ranging from supine mechanical motorized cervical traction to seated cervical traction using an over-the-door pulley support with attached weights. Duration of cervical traction can range from a few minutes to 20 to 30 min, once or twice weekly to several times per day. Anecdotal evidence suggests efficacy and safety, but there is no documentation of efficacy of cervical traction beyond short-term pain reduction. Because of a clinical impression that a simplified, inexpensive, over-the-door home cervical traction method of treatment requiring 5 min of cervical traction twice daily was efficacious for both cervical pain and radiculopathic syndromes, we undertook a retrospective study of 58 outpatients treated between 1994 and 1996. Age range was 29 to 84 (mean, 56) yr. Twenty-three males and 35 females were classified as Grade 1 to Grade 3 according to the Quebec Task Force of Whiplash-Associated Disorders Cohort Study. Outcomes were as follows: Grade 1 (mild)--4 of 4 (100%) patients improved; Grade 2 (moderate)--34 of 44 (77%) patients improved (P < 0.01), 5 were unchanged, and 5 felt their symptoms were aggravated by cervical traction; Grade 3 (patients with radiculopathy)--9 of 10 (90%) patients improved (P < 0.01). In a retrospective study, a brief (3-5 min), over-the-door home cervical traction modality provided symptomatic relief in 81% of the patients with mild to moderately severe (Grade 3) cervical spondylosis syndromes. Prospective, randomized assessment of cervical traction for this and other methods is needed.     

Parity among atopic and non-atopic mothers

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a copper-salicylate gel in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Rheumatology Clinic of St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales (a tertiary referral hospital), June 1993 to October 1994. PATIENTS: 116 patients with pain associated with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee (diagnosed by criteria of the European League against Rheumatism), drawn from patients attending the Clinic or self-referred after newspaper advertisements. INTERVENTION: Copper-salicylate or placebo gel (1.5 g) applied twice daily to the forearm for four weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-assessment of pain before the trial and after two and four weeks of treatment; patient and investigator assessments of efficacy; additional analgesia required; adverse reactions; and withdrawal rates. RESULTS: Pain scores at rest and on movement decreased in both the copper-salicylate and placebo groups by 13%-20%. There was no significant difference between the two groups for decrease in pain score, patient and investigator efficacy ratings, number of patients requiring paracetamol for extra analgesia (active, 77%; placebo, 71%) and average dose of paracetamol (active, 555 mg/day; placebo, 600 mg/day). Significantly more patients in the copper-salicylate group reported adverse reactions (83% versus 52% of the placebo group), most commonly skin reactions, and withdrew from the trial because of these reactions (17% versus 1.7% of the placebo group). CONCLUSION: Copper-salicylate gel applied to the forearm was no better than placebo gel as pain relief for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, but produced significantly more skin rashes.     

CD56+ NK lymphomas: clinicopathological features and prognosis

Dosing regimen is an important determinant of both drug cost and patient compliance. This retrospective analysis evaluated dosing regimens and drug acquisition costs for 101 patients identified from medical records in a large metropolitan hospital as having hypertension and/or benign prostatic hyperplasia and receiving alpha-blocker therapy with either doxazosin or terazosin. Although once-daily administration is generally recommended for both drugs, 25 (38%) of 66 patients receiving terazosin were treated twice daily compared with 6 (17%) of 35 patients treated twice daily with doxazosin. This difference was statistically significant. The average (mean +/- SD) daily treatment cost per patient for all individuals receiving terazosin during the period of the record review was $1.68 +/- 0.60. For patients treated with doxazosin, the average was $0.96 +/- 0.65-a highly statistically significant result. If all 66 patients receiving terazosin had been converted to doxazosin at the beginning of the study, annual savings would have been $17,345.00. These results demonstrate the importance of reviewing actual dosing regimens. The fact that doxazosin could be administered to a significantly higher percentage of patients once daily rather than twice daily substantially decreased its cost relative to terazosin. A once-daily treatment regimen may also enhance patient compliance, thereby improving the chances of therapeutic success.     

Ranitidine controls nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough on omeprazole: a controlled study in normal subjects

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors administered twice daily do not provide complete nocturnal acid suppression. Acid breakthrough, or decrease in intragastric pH to <4 for an hour or longer, occurs in three quarters of normal subjects and patients at night. We compared the effect of a third dose of omeprazole at bedtime with that of a dose of ranitidine at bedtime on residual nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily. METHODS: Twelve volunteers underwent overnight intragastric pH monitoring after 7 days of treatment with omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily, followed by different treatment supplements at bedtime: placebo; additional omeprazole, 20 mg; ranitidine, 150 mg; and ranitidine, 300 mg. RESULTS: Additional omeprazole at bedtime reduced the percentage of time with intragastric pH of <4 from 48% to 31% (P < 0.005) compared with omeprazole twice daily with placebo at bedtime. Ranitidine at bedtime reduced this parameter more, 5% with 150 mg and 6% with 300 mg (P <0.01 vs. omeprazole twice daily plus bedtime). Results for percentage of time with intragastric pH <3 were similar. Eleven subjects had acid breakthrough with placebo at bedtime; 7 with omeprazole at bedtime (P = NS); 4 with ranitidine, 150 mg at bedtime; and 3 with ranitidine, 300 mg at bedtime (P < 0. 05, ranitidine vs. placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Bedtime ranitidine is more effective than bedtime omeprazole on residual nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily. This finding suggests that fasting breakthrough nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily is most likely histamine related.     

A randomized comparison of a conventional dose, a low dose and alternate-day dosing of bendrofluazide in hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2.5 mg bendrofluazide daily (the standard antihypertensive dose), 1.25 mg bendrofluazide daily and 2.5 mg bendrofluazide on alternate days, in terms of reduction of blood pressure, patient compliance and adverse effect profile. DESIGN: A single-blind parallel group trial of patients who were randomly assigned to 16 weeks' treatment with bendrofluazide at doses of 2.5 mg daily, 1.25 mg daily and 2.5 mg every other day after a 4-week placebo run-in period. SETTING: General practices in the greater Belfast and Lisburn area in Northern Ireland. PATIENTS: Ninety-three patients with newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed hypertension, who had a mean diastolic blood pressure of 90-110 mmHg after receiving placebo for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in blood pressure, patient compliance and changes in biochemical variables. RESULTS: Sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures in members of all three groups were significantly lowered with respect to baseline (P < 0.01) with no differences among groups. Overall mean compliance was 97%. No clear relation between dose and biochemical changes was apparent. CONCLUSIONS: Bendrofluazide at doses of 1.25 mg daily or 2.5 mg every other day reduces blood pressure as effectively as does the conventional 2.5 mg daily regimen.     

Combination amoxycillin and metronidazole with famotidine in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori--a randomized, double-blind comparison of a three times daily and twice daily regimen

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of a three times daily (t.i.d.) versus a twice daily (b.i.d.) regimen of combination amoxycillin and metronidazole and famotidine in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and the influence of metronidazole resistance on the outcome of treatment. PATIENTS: Patients selected had unequivocal evidence of H. pylori infection based on the urease test, culture and histology and had either peptic ulcer disease or non-ulcer dyspepsia. DESIGN: The study was a comparative and double-blind study and patients were randomized to receive either amoxycillin 750 mg t.i.d. and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. for 12 days or amoxycillin 1000 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 12 days. Both groups also received famotidine 40 mg for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients were assessed for successful eradication, defined as absence of bacteria in all tests, at least 4 weeks after completion of antibiotic therapy by repeat gastroscopy. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients were recruited for the study. Two patients defaulted follow-up, two patients were withdrawn from the study and six patients were found to be non-compliant with medications. The eradication rates of the t.i.d. regimen was higher than the b.i.d. regimen (per protocol (PP) analysis: 83.3% (50/60) vs. 76.3% (45/59), P=0.337; intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis: 78.5% (51/65) vs. 75.0% (48/64), P=0.642). Seventy-five patients had pre-treatment cultures checked for metronidazole resistance, 33 (44.0%) were found to be resistant. Acquired resistance occurred in 3/40 (7.5%) patients. Eradication rates of metronidazole-sensitive and metronidazole-resistant patients: t.i.d. regimen - 100% (17/17) and 88.2% (15/17), b.i.d. regimen - 19/21 (90.5%) and 11/15 (73.3%). Side effects were reported in up to 70% of patients but were mild and tolerable in the majority. Two patients were withdrawn from the study because of a fixed drug eruption in one and generalized macular rash in the other. CONCLUSION: Combination amoxycillin and metronidazole is effective in eradicating H. pylori. There was a tendency for the t.i.d. regimen to be better than the b.i.d. regimen and for metronidazole-resistant infections to be associated with a lower eradication rate but these differences did not reach statistical significance.     

Efficacy and safety of salmeterol in childhood asthma

In children with asthma, twice daily administration of salmeterol 25 micrograms, salmeterol 50 micrograms and salbutamol 200 micrograms were compared in two, 3-month, double-blind, parallel group studies, one using metered dose inhalers (MDIs), the other using dry powder inhalers (Diskhaler, DPIs). Both studies were continued for a further 9 months during which time exacerbation rates, lung function at the clinic and adverse events were monitored. Similarities in design and methodology of the two studies justified a combined analysis. Eight hundred and forty-seven asthmatic children aged between 4 and 16 (mean 10.1) years, requiring inhaled beta 2-agonist treatment were randomised to treatment. After a 2 week run-in when all bronchodilator therapy was withdrawn, 279 patients received salmeterol 25 micrograms bd, 290 patients salmeterol 50 micrograms bd and 278 patients salbutamol 200 micrograms bd. After 3 months' treatment the change from baseline in daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was significantly greater with salmeterol 50 micrograms bd than with salbutamol 200 micrograms bd (P < 0.001). Salmeterol 50 micrograms bd was also significantly better than salmeterol 25 micrograms bd at improving mean morning PEF (P = 0.017) but both treatments had a similar effect on evening PEF. Analysis of variance showed an interaction between baseline PEF less than 100% predicted normal value and treatment outcome. Analysis of this sub-set of patients with lower lung function revealed similar results to the total population although the improvements in PEF from baseline were greater. Data from both studies, showed that the improvement in lung function was maintained throughout 12 months' treatment. Patients receiving salmeterol 50 micrograms bd had significantly more symptom-free nights (P < 0.01) and a higher percentage of rescue bronchodilator-free days (P = 0.01). The incidence of asthma exacerbations was evenly distributed between the three treatment groups and there was no evidence of any change in the rate of occurrence of exacerbations over the 12 month period. Adverse events were no different across treatment groups or across age groups and were primarily related to the patients' disease state. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol 50 micrograms bd is the appropriate dose for the treatment of children with mild to moderate asthma.     

Effectiveness of three different doses of carvedilol for exertional angina. Carvedilol-Angina Study Group

Carvedilol is a nonselective beta-receptor antagonist with vasodilating properties primarily due to selective alpha-1 antagonism. This 4-treatment, 5-period, double-blind, crossover study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 3 doses of carvedilol (12.5, 25, and 50 mg given twice daily) versus placebo in 122 patients with chronic stable angina. Carvedilol in doses of 25 mg twice daily and 50 mg twice daily was statistically superior to placebo with respect to time to angina (placebo: 316 seconds; 25 mg carvedilol: 337 seconds, p = 0.0039; 50 mg: 345 seconds, p <0.0001) and time to 1-mm ST-segment depression (placebo: 301 seconds; 25 mg: 313 seconds; 50 mg: 323 seconds; p <0.0001). The percentage of patients reporting any adverse experience was slightly less in those receiving placebo (placebo: 28.4%; 12.5 mg: 33.1%; 25 mg: 34.5%; 50 mg: 31.9%). Carvedilol is effective and safe in treating patients with chronic stable angina.     

Omeprazole 10 milligrams once daily, omeprazole 20 milligrams once daily, or ranitidine 150 milligrams twice daily, evaluated as initial therapy for the relief of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general practice

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and the therapeutic advantages over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists are well documented. This study assessed 20 mg omeprazole daily (OM20), 10 mg omeprazole daily (OM10), and 150 mg ranitidine (RAN) twice daily for symptom relief in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). METHODS: Patients (n = 994) presenting with heartburn to their general practitioner underwent endoscopy to exclude peptic ulcer disease and were randomized into a UK, multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind comparison of the three treatments for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at clinic visits after 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Symptom relief after 4 weeks was achieved by 61% (OM20), 49% (OM10), and 40% (RAN) patients (OM20 versus OM10, P < 0.0167; OM20 versus RAN, P < 0.0001; OM10 versus RAN, P < 0.01). Among the patients (32%) with erosive reflux oesophagitis, symptom relief was achieved in 79% (OM20), 48% (OM10), and 33% (RAN) (OM20 versus OM10, P < 0.0001; OM20 versus RAN, P < 0.0001; OM1O versus RAN, NS). CONCLUSION: Omeprazole, 20 mg, is the most effective initial therapy for relief of GORD symptoms.     

Maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis: a comparison between balsalazide 3 g daily and mesalazine 1.2 g daily over 12 months. ABACUS Investigator group

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use of aminosalicylates as maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), patients still report troublesome symptoms, often nocturnally. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of balsalazide (Colazide) with mesalazine (Asacol) in maintaining UC remission. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind comparison of balsalazide 3 g daily (1.04 g 5-ASA) and mesalazine 1.2 g daily for 12 months, in 99 (95 evaluable) patients in UC remission. RESULTS: Balsalazide patients experienced more asymptomatic nights (90% vs. 77%, P=0.0011) and days (58% vs. 50%, N.S.) during the first 3 months. Balsalazide patients experienced more symptom-free nights per week (6.4+/-1.7 vs. 4.7+/-2.8; P=0.0006) and fewer nights per week with blood on their stools or on the toilet paper, mucus with their stools or with sleep disturbance resulting from symptoms or lavatory visits (each P < 0.05). Fewer balsalazide patients relapsed within 3 months (10% vs. 28%; P=0.0354). Remission at 12 months was 58%, in both groups. Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (61% balsalazide vs. 65% mesalazine). There were five serious adverse events (two balsalazide, three mesalazine) and four withdrawals due to unacceptable adverse events (three balsalazide, one mesalazine), of which one in each group was also a serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Balsalazide 3 g/day and mesalazine 1.2 g/ day effectively maintain UC remission and are equally well tolerated over 12 months. At this dose balsalazide prevents more relapses during the first 3 months of treatment and controls nocturnal symptoms more effectively.     

Comparison of once-daily doses of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg) and placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, conducted in 520 patients, was to compare the efficacy and safety of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg once daily) with placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer. METHODS: Treatment with omeprazole or placebo lasted 4 wk; those whose ulcers remained unhealed continued the same treatment regimen for an additional 4 wk. The effects of therapy were determined by endoscopy and assessment of GI symptoms. Safety and tolerability were evaluated through reported adverse events, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: At weeks 4 and 8, the proportion of patients with healed ulcers was significantly greater in the omeprazole 40- and 20-mg groups than in the placebo group (p < 0.01). At week 8, the healing rate was significantly greater in the 40-mg group than in the 20-mg group (82.7 vs 74.8%, p < 0.05). In patients with large ulcers (>1 cm), the 40-mg regimen was associated with a significantly higher healing rate (78.9%) than both the 20-mg regimen (61.4%) and placebo (34.6%) at week 8 (p < 0.05 vs omeprazole 20 mg; p < 0.01 vs placebo). Healing rates in patients with small ulcers were similar for the 40- and 20-mg groups. Omeprazole was well tolerated, with no significant differences versus placebo in the overall incidence of clinical or laboratory adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 40 and 20 mg, administered once daily, healed a significantly greater proportion of patients than did placebo. The 40-mg regimen offered significant advantages over the 20-mg regimen in patients with large ulcers.