Life cycle assessment of nuclear hydrogen production processes based on high temperature gas-cooled reactor

Conventional hydrogen production technologies mostly fossil fuels as energy and material basis. The rapid development of nuclear energy in recent years offers a new opportunity. Clean electricity and process heat generated by nuclear reactors can provide energy for hydrogen production, effectively reducing the environmental burden. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA) method to sort out the inputs and outputs of the nuclear hydrogen production processes and analyze the environmental impacts based on local data in China. In this study, we constructed frameworks for two nuclear energy-based processes and created four different scenarios to compare the effect of energy efficiency. Six indicators were used to quantify the environmental impact. The results showed that: (1) electrolysis cell manufacturing and spent fuel disposal generate the largest emissions in hydrogen production. (2) S–I cycle is sensitive to heat transfer efficiency, while high-temperature electrolysis is more sensitive to power generation efficiency; (3) The environmental impact of high-temperature electrolysis (without carrier gas) is slightly lower than that of S–I cycle, but the advantage will disappear as energy efficiency increases. At present, high-temperature electrolysis offers a clean alternative to conventional technologies for hydrogen energy and hydrogen economy. The S–I cycle might have a better prospect in the future. Our study results will provide a scientific assessment of the possibilities of developing nuclear energy for hydrogen production in China and help to make some decisions and policies.     

Clean fuel options with hydrogen for sea transportation: A life cycle approach

In this study, two potential fuels, namely hydrogen and ammonia, are alternatively proposed to replace heavy fuel oils in the engines of sea transportation vehicles. A comparative life cycle assessments of different types of sea transportation vehicles are performed to investigate the impacts of fuel switching on the environment. The entire transport life cycle is considered in the life cycle analyses consisting of production of freight ship and tanker; operation of freight ship and tanker; construction and land use of port; operation, maintenance and disposal of port; production and transportation of these clean fuels. Various environmental impact categories, such as global warming, marine sediment ecotoxicity, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, acidification and ozone layer depletion are selected in order to examine the diverse effects of switching to clean fuels in maritime transportation. As a carbon-free fuel for marine vehicle engines, ammonia and hydrogen, yield considerably lower global warming impact during the operation. Furthermore, numerous production methods of alternative fuels are evaluated to comparatively show environmentally benign options. The results of this study demonstrate that if ammonia is even partially utilized in the engines of ocean tankers as dual fuel (with heavy fuel oils), overall life cycle greenhouse gas emissions per tonne-kilometer can be decreased about 27% whereas it can be decreased by about 40% when hydrogen is used as dual fuel.     

Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods

A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) is reported for five methods of hydrogen production, namely steam reforming of natural gas, coal gasification, water electrolysis via wind and solar electrolysis, and thermochemical water splitting with a Cu–Cl cycle. Carbon dioxide equivalent emissions and energy equivalents of each method are quantified and compared. A case study is presented for a hydrogen fueling station in Toronto, Canada, and nearby hydrogen resources close to the fueling station. In terms of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl cycle is found to be advantageous over the other methods, followed by wind and solar electrolysis. In terms of hydrogen production capacities, natural gas steam reforming, coal gasification and thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl cycle methods are found to be advantageous over the renewable energy methods.     

Life cycle net energy and global warming impact assessment for hydrogen production via decomposition of ammonia recovered from source-separated human urine

Decomposition of ammonia derived from source-separated human urine is a renewable approach for hydrogen production. Life cycle net energy analysis and global warming impact of scaled-up hydrogen production via this technique are studied in this paper. Ammonia decomposition processes, including fixed-bed reactors with Ru/Al₂O₃ and Ni/Al₂O₃ as catalyst options are simulated using the Aspen Plus software, and the results are compared with published data for validation. The life cycle net energy indicators are assessed for three scenarios of ammonia generation: conventional air stripping, microbial fuel cell, and electrochemical cell methods at a unit basis of 1000 kg of H₂ production. Results show that the microbial fuel cell process is more energy-efficient and emits lower greenhouse gases. The net energy ratio of the microbial fuel cell method is 1.38, and 1.12, for Ru/Al₂O₃ and Ni/Al₂O₃, respectively. A comparative assessment of ammonia generation and decomposition options for environmentally-benign hydrogen production is discussed.     

A well to pump life cycle environmental impact assessment of some hydrogen production routes

In the present study, a comparative well to pump life cycle assessment is conducted on the hydrogen production routes of water electrolysis, biomass gasification, coal gasification, steam methane reforming, hydrogen production from ethanol and methanol. The CML 2001 impact assessment methodology is employed for assessment and comparison. Comparatively higher life cycle Carbon dioxide and Sulphur oxide emissions of 27.3 kg/kg H₂ and 50.0 g/kg H₂ respectively are determined for the water electrolysis hydrogen production route via U.S. electricity mix. In addition, the life cycle global warming potential of this route (28.6 kg CO_2eq/kg H₂) is found to be comparatively higher than other routes followed by coal gasification (23.7 kg CO_2eq/kg H₂)_. However, the ethanol based hydrogen production route is estimated to have comparatively higher life cycle emissions of nitrogen dioxide (19.6 g/kg H₂) and volatile organic compounds (10.3 g/kg H₂). Moreover, this route is determined to have a comparatively higher photochemical ozone creation potential of 0.0045 kg-ethene_eq/kg H₂ as well as eutrophication potential of 0.0043 kg PO_4eq/kg H_2. The results of this study are comparatively discussed to signify the importance of life cycle assessment in comparing the environmental sustainability of hydrogen production routes.     

A comparative life cycle analysis of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a Cu-Cl cycle

In this paper, a comparative environmental study is reported of the Cu-Cl water-splitting cycle with various other hydrogen production methods: the sulphur-iodine (S-I) water-splitting cycle, high temperature water electrolysis, conventional steam reforming of natural gas and hydrogen production from renewable resources. The investigation uses life cycle assessment (LCA), which is an analytical tool to identify and quantify environmentally critical phases during the life cycle of a system or a product and/or to evaluate and decrease the overall environmental impact of the system or product. The LCA results for the hydrogen production processes indicate that the thermochemical cycles have lower environmental impacts while steam reforming of natural gas has the highest.     

Life cycle assessment of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production via nuclear energy

A life cycle assessment (LCA) of one proposed method of hydrogen production—the high temperature electrolysis of water vapor—is presented in this paper. High temperature electrolysis offers an advantage of higher energy efficiency over the conventional low-temperature alkaline electrolysis due to reduced cell potential and consequent electrical energy requirements. The primary energy source for the electrolysis will be advanced nuclear reactors operating at temperatures corresponding to those required for the high temperature electrolysis. The LCA examines the environmental impact of the combined advanced nuclear-high temperature electrolysis plant, focusing upon quantifying the emissions of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides per kilogram of hydrogen produced. The results are presented in terms of the global warming potential (GWP) and the acidification potential (AP) of the system. The GWP for the system is 2000 g carbon dioxide equivalent and the AP, 0.15 g equivalents of hydrogen ion equivalent per kilogram of hydrogen produced. The GWP and AP of this process are one-sixth and one-third, respectively, of those for the hydrogen production by steam reforming of natural gas, and are comparable to producing hydrogen from wind- or hydro-electricity powered conventional electrolysis.     

Life cycle evaluation of hydrogen and other potential fuels for aircrafts

In the present study, hydrogen and some other alternative fuels (such as ammonia, methanol, ethanol, liquefied natural gas) are considered for aviation applications under a comprehensive life cycle assessment study and are evaluated comparatively with the conventional kerosene based jet fuel for various impact categories. Therefore, this study is performed with a well-to-wake approach to evaluate the overall life cycle of an aircraft running on these conventional and alternative fuels. Both conventional and renewable fuel routes are considered for the production of ammonia and hydrogen fuels. Although there are modifications required to fulfill the aviation fuel specifications for such alternative fuels, the long term viability and environmental sustainability make them attractive solutions for the future of aviation industry. This study uses a life cycle assessment of an average aircraft utilizing various alternative aviation fuels to determine the relative environmental impact of each life cycle phase. The life cycle phases included in the analyses are as follows: (i) production, operation and maintenance of the aircraft, (ii) construction, maintenance and disposal of the airport, (iii) production, transportation and utilization of the aviation fuel in the aircraft. The results show that hydrogen and liquefied natural gas represent more environmentally benign alternatives although fuel costs are higher compared to ammonia, jet fuel and methanol. The total GHG emissions from hydropower based ammonia and hydrogen are calculated to be about 0.24 kg CO₂ eq. per traveled tonne-km and 0.03 kg CO₂ eq. per traveled tonne-km, respectively. Renewable based ammonia and hydrogen fueled aircrafts can further decrease the overall environmental impact in many categories allowing a brighter future for aviation industry.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production by methane decomposition using carbonaceous catalysts

Methane decomposition to yield hydrogen and carbon (CH₄ ? 2H₂ + C) is one of the cleanest alternatives, free of CO₂ emissions, for producing hydrogen from fossil fuels. This reaction can be catalyzed by metals, although they suffer a fast deactivation process, or by carbonaceous materials, which present the advantage of producing the catalyst from the carbon obtained in the reaction. In this work, the environmental performance of methane decomposition catalyzed by carbonaceous catalysts has been evaluated through Life Cycle Assessment tools, comparing it to other decomposition processes and steam methane reforming coupled to carbon capture systems. The results obtained showed that the decomposition using the autogenerated carbonaceous as catalyst is the best option when reaction conversions higher than 65% are attained. These were confirmed by 2015 and 2030 forecastings. Moreover, its environmental performance is highly increased when the produced carbon is used in other commercial applications. Thus, for a methane conversion of 70%, the application of 50% of the produced carbon would lead to a virtually zero-emissions process.     

Environmental impacts of a standalone solar water splitting system for sustainable hydrogen production: A life cycle assessment

Hydrogen is broadly utilized in various industries. It can also be considered as a future clean energy carrier. Currently, hydrogen is mainly produced from typical fuels such as coal; however, there exist some other clean alternatives which use water decomposition techniques. Water splitting via the copper-chlorine (Cu–Cl) thermochemical cycle is a superb option for producing clean carbon-free fuel. Here, the life cycle assessment (LCA) technique is used to investigate the environmental consequences of an integrated solar Cu–Cl fuel production facility for large-scale hydrogen production. The impact of varying important input parameters including irradiation level, plant lifetime, and solar-to-hydrogen efficiency on various environmental impacts are investigated next. For instance, an improve in the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency from 15% to 30%, results in a reduction in the GWP from 1.25 to 6.27E-01 kg CO₂ eq. An uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to deal with the study uncertainties. The results of the LCA show that the potential of acidification and global warming potential (GWP) of the current system are 8.27E-03 kg SO₂ eq. and 0.91 kg CO₂ eq./kg H₂, respectively. According to the sensitivity analysis, the plant lifetime has the highest effect on the total GWP of the plant with a range of 0.63–1.88 kg of CO₂ eq./kg H₂. Results comparison with past thermochemical-based studies shows that the GWP of the current integrated system is 7% smaller than that of a solar sulfur-iodine thermochemical cycle.     

Life cycle assessment of three types of hydrogen production methods using solar energy

A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) is carried out for three methods of hydrogen production by solar energy: hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis coupling photothermal power generation, hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis coupling photovoltaic power generation, and hydrogen production by thermochemical water splitting method using S–I cycle coupling solar photothermal technology. The assessment also contains an evaluation of four environmental factors which are global warming potential, acidification potential, ozone depletion potential, and nutrient enrichment potential. After conducting a quantitative analysis of all three methods with environmental factors being considered, a conclusion has been drawn: The global warming potential and the acidification potential of the thermochemical water splitting by S–I cycle coupling solar photothermal technology are 1.02 kg CO₂-eq and 6.56E-3 kg SO₂-eq. And this method has significant advantages in the environmental impact of the whole ecosystem.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen supply chain with special attention on hydrogen refuelling stations

The controversial and highly emotional discussion about biofuels in recent years has shown that greenhouse gas² (GHG) emissions can only be evaluated in an acceptable way by carrying out a full life cycle assessment (LCA) taking the overall life cycle including all necessary pre-chains into consideration. Against this background, the goal of this paper is it to analyse the overall life cycle of a hydrogen production and provision. A state of the art hydrogen refuelling station in Hamburg/Germany opened in February 2012 is therefore taken into consideration. Here at least 50% hydrogen from renewable sources of energy is produced on-site by water electrolysis based on surplus electricity from wind (mainly offshore wind parks) and water. The remaining other 50% of hydrogen to be sold by this station mainly to hydrogen-fuelled buses is provided by trucks from a large-scale production plant where hydrogen is produced from methane or glycerol as a by-product of the biodiesel production. These two pathways are compared within the following explanations with hydrogen production from biomass and from coal. The results show that – with the goal of reducing GHG emissions on a life cycle perspective – hydrogen production based on a water electrolysis fed by electricity from the German electricity mix should be avoided. Steam methane reforming is more promising in terms of GHG reduction but it is still based on a finite fossil fuel. For a climatic sound provision of hydrogen as a fuel electricity from renewable sources of energy like wind or biomass should be used.     

A life cycle impact analysis of various hydrogen production methods for public transportation sector

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is an important task to reduce the adverse effects of climate change. A large portion of greenhouse gas emissions apparently originates from the transportation sector. Therefore, adopting cleaner technologies with lower emission footprints has become vital. For this reason, in this study, a life cycle impact analysis of hydrogen production technologies as an alternative to fossil fuels and the utilization of hydrogen in fuel cell electric buses is carried out. According to the results of this study, the operational contributions of internal combustion engines have a significant impact on life cycle impact analysis indicators. The global warming potentials of clean hydrogen production technologies result in much lower results compared to conventional hydrogen production technologies. Also, almost all indicators for biohydrogen production technologiess yield lower results because of the wastewater removal. The global warming potential results of hydrogen production methods are found to be 6.8, 1.9, 2.1, 0.5, 0.2, and 7.9 kg CO₂ eq./kg H₂ for PV electrolysis, wind electrolysis, high temperature electrolysis, dark fermentation, photo fermentation and conventional hydrogen production, respectively. However, the chemicals used in PV and wind turbine production increased the ecotoxicological indicators. On the other hand, hydrogen utilization in buses is a better option environmentally. The global warming potentials for PV electrolysis, wind electrolysis, high temperature electrolysis, dark fermentation, photo fermentation, conventional hydrogen, compressed natural gas bus, and diesel bus are found to be 0.060, 0.016, 0.018, 0.007, 0.006, 0.053, 0.082, and 0.125 kg CO₂ eq./p.km, respectively. The results are especially important in terms of reducing the effects at the source and optimizing the systems.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from biomass gasification. Evaluation of different Spanish feedstocks

Gasification of biomass can be used for obtaining hydrogen reducing the total greenhouse gases emissions due the fixation of CO₂ during photosynthetic processes. The kind of raw materials is an important variable since has a great influence on the energy balance and environmental impacts. Wastes from forestry are considered as the most appropriate raw materials since they do not compete for land. The aim of this work is to determine the environmental feasibility of four Spanish lignocellulosic wastes (vine and almond pruning and forest waste coming from pine and eucalyptus plantation) for the production of hydrogen through gasification. LCA methodology was applied using global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication and the gross energy necessary for the production of 1 Nm³ of hydrogen as impact categories. As expected, the use of biomass instead of natural gas leads to the reduction of CO₂ emissions. Regarding to the different feedstocks, biomass coming from forestry is more environmental-friendly since does not need cropping procedures. Finally, the distribution of environmental charges between pruning wastes and fruits (grape and almond) and the use of obtained by-products have a great influence, reducing the environmental impacts.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell and gasoline vehicles

A life cycle assessment of hydrogen and gasoline vehicles, including fuel production and utilization in vehicles powered by fuel cells and internal combustion engines, is conducted to evaluate and compare their efficiencies and environmental impacts. Fossil fuel and renewable technologies are investigated, and the assessment is divided into various stages.     

Review and comparison of various hydrogen production methods based on costs and life cycle impact assessment indicators

Hydrogen is a clean, renewable secondary energy source. The development of hydrogen energy is a common goal pursued by many countries to combat the current global warming trend. This paper provides an overview of various technologies for hydrogen production from renewable and non-renewable resources, including fossil fuel or biomass-based hydrogen production, microbial hydrogen production, electrolysis and thermolysis of water and thermochemical cycles. The current status of development, recent advances and challenges of different hydrogen production technologies are also reviewed. Finally, we compared different hydrogen production methods in terms of cost and life cycle environmental impact assessment. The current mainstream approach is to obtain hydrogen from natural gas and coal, although their environmental impact is significant. Electrolysis and thermochemical cycle methods coupled with new energy sources show considerable potential for development in terms of economics and environmental friendliness.     

Comprehensive comparative analysis of open-loop and closed-loop iodine-sulfur thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production

The Iodine-Sulfur (IS) or called Sulfur-Iodine (SI) thermochemical water-splitting cycle is one of the most promising hydrogen production methods through heat. For future commercial application, the closed-loop cycle coupled to nuclear power plant and the open-loop cycle coupled to sulfuric acid plant are the best solutions. In this study, comprehensive comparative analysis between four different hydrogen production cases is investigated from the aspects of thermal efficiency calculation, economic evaluation and life cycle assessment. With reasonable assumptions, the processes of IS closed-loop and open-loop cycle are designed and optimized through the Aspen Plus software. The corresponding stream results, specific parameters of heat exchangers and reactors and power demand of the cycle are presented in detail. With sufficient internal heat exchange, the calculated thermal efficiency is 50.94% and 81.9% respectively. The levelized cost of Case A, B, C and D is 2.26, 1.82, 1.33 and 1.64 US$/kg H₂ respectively with market electricity and sulfuric acid price, so Case C and D seem more competitive. With life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluation, the environmental impacts of Case A and Case D are smaller, followed by Case B and Case C. Through comprehensive consideration of the levelized cost and environmental impacts, Case B and Case D are more promising.     

Life cycle environmental impact comparison of solid oxide fuel cells fueled by natural gas,hydrogen, ammonia and methanol for combined heat and power generation

This study aims to provide a comprehensive environmental life cycle assessment of heat and power production through solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) fueled by various chemical feeds namely; natural gas, hydrogen, ammonia and methanol. The life cycle assessment (LCA) includes the complete phases from raw material extraction or chemical fuel synthesis to consumption in the electrochemical reaction as a cradle-to-grave approach. The LCA study is performed using GaBi software, where the selected impact assessment methodology is ReCiPe 1.08. The selected environmental impact categories are climate change, fossil depletion, human toxicity, water depletion, particulate matter formation, and photochemical oxidant formation. The production pathways of the feed gases are selected based on the mature technologies as well as emerging water electrolysis via wind electricity. Natural gas is extracted from the wells and processed in the processing plant to be fed to SOFC. Hydrogen is generated by steam methane reforming method using the natural gas in the plant. Methanol is also produced by steam methane reforming and methanol synthesis reaction. Ammonia is synthesized using the hydrogen obtained from steam methane reforming and combined with nitrogen from air in a Haber-Bosch plant. Both hydrogen and ammonia are also produced via wind energy-driven decentralized electrolysis in order to emphasize the cleaner fuel production. The results of this study show that feeding SOFC systems with carbon-free fuels eliminates the greenhouse gas emissions during operation, however additional steps required for natural gas to hydrogen, ammonia and methanol conversion, make the complete process more environmentally problematic. However, if hydrogen and ammonia are produced from renewable sources such as wind-based electricity, the environmental impacts reduce significantly, yielding about 0.05 and 0.16 kg CO₂ eq., respectively, per kWh electricity generation from SOFC.     

Environmental life cycle feasibility assessment of hydrogen as an automotive fuel in Western Australia

A life cycle assessment has been undertaken in order to determine the environmental feasibility of hydrogen as an automotive fuel in Western Australia. The criterion for environmental feasibility has been defined as having life cycle impacts equal to or lower than those of petrol. Two hydrogen production methods have been analysed. The first is steam methane reforming (SMR), which uses natural gas (methane) as a feedstock. The second method analysed is alkaline electrolysis (AE), a mature technology that uses water as a feedstock. The life cycle emissions and impacts were assessed per kilometre of vehicle travel.     

Life cycle analysis of processes for hydrogen production

Hydrogen is considered to be an ideal energy carrier in the foreseeable future and can play a very important role in the energy system. A variety of technologies can be used to produce hydrogen. One of the most remarkable methods for large-scale hydrogen production is thermo-chemical water decomposition using heat energy from nuclear, solar and other sources. Detailed simulations of the two most promising water splitting thermo-chemical cycles (the Westinghouse cycle and the Sulphur-Iodine cycle) were performed in Aspen Plus code and obtained results were used for life cycle analysis. They were compared with two different processes for hydrogen production (coal gasification and coal pyrolysis). Some of the results obtained from LCA are also reported in the paper.