First record of trypanosomes in Tasmanian bandicoots

Postoperative pain control after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is effectively obtained with morphine 0.1-0.3 mg intrathecally, although there may be dose-dependent side effects. We evaluated the quality of analgesia and the incidence of side effects with smaller doses of intrathecal morphine combined with intramuscular (i.m.) diclofenac. One hundred-twenty pregnant patients were allocated into six groups, which received the following treatments: Groups 1, 3, and 5 received 0.1, 0.05, and 0.025 mg of intrathecal morphine, respectively, plus 75 mg of i.m. diclofenac every 8 h; Groups 2, 4, and 6 received 0.1, 0.05, and 0.025 mg of intrathecal morphine, respectively, plus i.m. diclofenac on demand. Spinal anesthesia was performed with 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Pain scores and side effects were evaluated hourly for the first 24 h. Groups 1 and 2 had lower pain scores than Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6. However, only patients in Groups 2, 4, and 6 requested additional analgesics. Severe pruritus was more frequent in Groups 1 and 2. No patient experienced respiratory depression. We conclude that there is no advantage in using doses larger than 0.025 mg of intrathecal morphine if they are combined with systemic diclofenac. IMPLICATIONS: A multimodal approach to pain control may provide good quality analgesia while reducing drug-related side effects. In this study, a very small dose of intrathecal morphine, in association with intramuscular diclofenac, proved effective for controlling pain after cesarean delivery, with a low incidence of morphine-induced pruritus.     

Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia

BACKGROUND: This series investigated the quality of analgesia and the incidence and severity of side effects of intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia administered over a dose range of 0.0-0.5 mg. METHODS: ONE hundred eight term parturients undergoing cesarean delivery at term and given spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive a single dose of intrathecal morphine (0.0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 mg). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device provided free access to additional analgesics. PCA morphine use, incidence and severity of side effects, and need for treatment interventions were recorded for 24 h. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and linear regression analysis for trends among groups. RESULTS: Patient-controlled analgesia use differed significantly between groups; PCA use was higher in the control group than in groups receiving 0.075, 0.1, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 mg. Twenty-four-hour PCA morphine use was 45.7 mg lower (95% CI, 4.8-86.6 mg lower) in the 0.075-mg group than the control group. There was no difference in PCA morphine use between the 0.075- and 0.5-mg groups (95% CI, 36.8 mg lower to 45.0 mg higher); despite a fivefold increase in intrathecal morphine dose, PCA morphine use remained constant. There was no difference between control and treatment groups or among treatment groups with respect to nausea and vomiting. Pruritus and the need for treatment interventions increased in direct proportion to the dose of intrathecal morphine (linear regression, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate there is little justification for use of more than 0.1 mg for post-cesarean analgesia. For optimal analgesia, augmentation [corrected] of intrathecal morphine with systemic opioids may be necessary.     

A survey on the intended purposes and perceived utility of preoperative cardiology consultations

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, such as MK801, delay the development of morphine tolerance. Magnesium, a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, reduces postoperative morphine requirements. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of intrathecal co-administration of magnesium sulfate with morphine on antinociceptive potentiation, tolerance, and naloxone-induced withdrawal signs. Magnesium sulfate (40-60 microg/h) co-administration for 7 days, similar to MK801 (10 nmol/h), prevented the decline in antinociceptive response compared with morphine (20 nmol/h). Magnesium sulfate (60 microg/h) produced no antinociception, but co-infused with morphine (1 nmol/h), it resulted in potentiated antinociception compared with morphine throughout the 7-day period. Probe morphine doses after 7-day infusions demonstrated a significantly greater 50% effective dose value for morphine 1 nmol/h (109.7 nmol) compared with saline (10.9 nmol), magnesium sulfate 60 microg/h (10.9 nmol), and magnesium sulfate 60 microg/h plus morphine 1 nmol/h (11.2 nmol), which indicates that magnesium had delayed morphine tolerance. Morphine withdrawal signs after naloxone administration were not altered by the co-infusion of magnesium sulfate. Cerebrospinal fluid magnesium levels after intrathecal magnesium sulfate (60 microg/h) for 2 days increased from 17.0 +/- 1.0 microg/mL to 41.4 +/- 23.6 microg/mL, although serum levels were unchanged. This study demonstrates antinociceptive potentiation and delay in the development of morphine tolerance by the intrathecal coinfusion of magnesium sulfate and morphine in the rat. Implications: The addition of magnesium sulfate, an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, to morphine in an intrathecal infusion provided better analgesia than morphine alone in normal rats. These results suggest that intrathecal administration of magnesium sulfate may be a useful adjunct to spinal morphine analgesia.     

Evaluation of intravenous tenoxicam for postoperative cesarean delivery pain relief. Preliminary report

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess safety and efficacy of tenoxicam for postoperative pain relief after cesarean delivery. METHODS: Postoperative pain relief, supplemental analgesic requirements, and adverse side effects were evaluated in 80 patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Forty patients received a slow intravenous injection of tenoxicam at a fixed dose of 20 mg (2 mL), immediately before induction of spinal anesthesia with 15 mg (3 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The other 40 patients received 2 mL of saline solution. Newborns were evaluated by means of Apgar score and umbilical cord blood gases. RESULTS: There was a significant prolongation of analgesia in the tenoxicam group (365 +/- 91.1 minutes versus 305 +/- 53.2 minutes in control group, P < .001). Supplementary analgesic requirements were significantly decreased by intravenous tenoxicam (1.55 +/- 0.70 versus 2.25 +/- 0.68). Adverse side effects did not differ between groups and few complaints of phlebitis were noted. Apgar scores and blood gas analyses were similar in neonates from both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous tenoxicam is safe and slightly increases the length of postoperative analgesia provided by the local anesthetic. It is effective in decreasing analgesic consumption in cesarean delivery patients.     

Drug-resistant tuberculosis in Singapore, 1995 to 1996

BACKGROUND: Thymectomy can induce a remission or at least an improvement in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. After sternotomy MG patients with compromised muscle strength need an excellent postoperative pain relief. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal morphine (ITM) on ventilatory function among MG patients undergoing trans-sternal thymectomy, when intravenous morphine served as control. METHODS: Twenty consecutive MG patients were randomised to receive either morphine (10 micrograms/kg) intrathecally at induction or intravenous morphine (30 micrograms/kg) with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Anaesthesia was standardised. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, arterial blood gases, pain intensity and morphine consumption were assessed during 48 hours. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 35 +/- 3.4 years and the mean duration of the disease 1.9 +/- 0.5 years. According to Osserman's classification 70% of the patients belonged to Class IIA and 30% to Class IIB. ITM restored ventilatory function significantly better than iv PCA morphine. FVC recovered to 60% and FEV1 to 57% of the baseline values in the ITM group compared with 32% (P < 0.05) and 37% in the PCA morphine group, respectively. Postpuncture headache occurred in 4/10 patients. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal morphine provided effective postoperative analgesia and significantly improved ventilatory function when compared with intravenous morphine.     

Adrenalectomy for a solitary adrenal metastasis from lung cancer

Intrathecal sufentanil provides approximately 2 h of excellent labor analgesia with minimal motor blockade. Epidural sufentanil has received less scrutiny but may provide the same benefits as intrathecal sufentanil. In this study, we compared epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine with an epinephrine test dose with intrathecal (i.t.) sufentanil 10 microg with respect to onset and duration of analgesia, degree of motor block, side effect profile, and mode of delivery. Seventy ASA physical status I or II parturients in early labor (< or = 4 cm cervical dilation) were randomized to receive either i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with a combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) or epidural sufentanil 40 microg (e.p.) after epidural catheter placement and testing with 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine (15 microg). After the administration of analgesia, pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, and every 30 min thereafter, by an observer blinded to the technique used. The study period was completed when the patients requested additional analgesia. All patients, except one, achieved adequate analgesia with the initial study dose and satisfactorily completed the study. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Pain relief was rapid for all patients; pain scores were significantly lower at 5 and 10 min in the i.t. group versus the e.p. group. The mean duration of analgesia was similar between the e.p. group (127 +/- 40 min) and the i.t. group (110 +/- 48 min). No patient experienced any motor block. Side effects were similar between the two groups, except for pruritus-both the incidence and severity were significantly more profound at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in the i.t. group. There was no difference in time from analgesic to delivery, incidence of operative or assisted delivery, or cervical dilation at the time of redose. For early laboring patients, epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine test dose provides analgesia comparable to that of i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with less pruritus. Implications: We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal sufentanil with epidural sufentanil with a local anesthetic test dose for analgesia during labor. Analgesia was equally good, although the intrathecal group experienced more itching.     

High-Resolution Infrared Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy and Rotational Constants of the nu4 Band of BrNO2

In this study, we assessed the influence of three analgesic techniques on postoperative knee rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty-five patients scheduled for elective TKA under general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups. Postoperative analgesia was provided with i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine in Group A, continuous 3-in-1 block in Group B, and epidural analgesia in Group C. Immediately after surgery, the three groups started identical physical therapy regimens. Pain scores, supplemental analgesia, side effects, degree of maximal knee flexion, day of first walk, and duration of hospital stay were recorded. Patients in Groups B and C reported significantly lower pain scores than those in Group A. Supplemental analgesia was comparable in the three groups. Compared with Groups A and C, a significantly lower incidence of side effects was noted in Group B. Significantly better knee flexion (until 6 wk after surgery), faster ambulation, and shorter hospital stay were noted in Groups B and C. However, these benefits did not affect outcome at 3 mo. We conclude that, after TKA, continuous 3-in-1 block and epidural analgesia provide better pain relief and faster knee rehabilitation than i.v. PCA with morphine. Because it induces fewer side effects, continuous 3-in-1 block should be considered the technique of choice. Implications: In this study, we determined that, after total knee arthroplasty, loco-regional analgesic techniques (epidural analgesia or continuous 3-in-1 block) provide better pain relief and faster postoperative knee rehabilitation than i.v. patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. Because it causes fewer side effects than epidural analgesia, continuous 3-in-1 block is the technique of choice.     

Correlation between motility of testicular spermatozoa, testicular histology and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Many studies have demonstrated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of fentanyl delivered i.v. by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) devices at demand doses ranging from 10 to 50 microg, but none has sought to define the optimal fentanyl PCA dose. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, we compared the safety and efficacy of three administered demand-dose sizes of fentanyl (20, 40, and 60 microg) in 150 patients after major surgery. Efficacy was dose-dependent; positive response rates (i.e., a global assessment score of "very good" or "excellent" and the absence of severe opioid adverse effects) were 42%, 52%, and 68% for the 20, 40, and 60 microg demand-dose groups, respectively, and were significantly higher in the 60 microg demand-dose group. The number of doses administered and missed attempts were significantly smaller in the 40 and 60 microg demand-dose groups compared with the 20 microg demand-dose group. This suggests that the 20 microg demand dose provided inadequate pain relief. Adverse respiratory events were more frequent and mean respiratory rates were significantly slower with the 60 microg demand dose, compared with the 20 or 40 microg demand doses. These results indicate that, of these three doses, the 40 microg demand dose was optimal for fentanyl PCA management of moderate to severe pain after major surgery. IMPLICATIONS: The postoperative analgesic efficacy of fentanyl delivered i.v. by patient-controlled analgesia devices has been demonstrated for demand doses ranging from 10 to 50 microg, but the optimal fentanyl dose remains unknown. In this randomized, double-blind study, we compared three demand dose sizes of fentanyl (20, 40, and 60 microg) and found that the 40 microg demand dose was the most appropriate for fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia management of postoperative pain.     

Discovery of a new cyclooxygenase-2 lead compound through 3-D database searching and combinatorial chemistry

Prolonged nerve conduction blockade has been proposed to result from the summed effects of charged and neutral local anaesthetics. Thirty-seven patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenous patient-controlled analgesia alone or combined with intercostal blockade (T7-T11) with a mixture of 0.45% bupivacaine and 0.6% phenol for post-cholecystectomy analgesia. Adequacy of pain relief was measured by patient scores on a 10-cm visual analogue scale and by dose-demand ratio, amounts of loading dose and total consumption of morphine and also the duration of patient-controlled analgesia in each group. No differences were found between groups in post-operative scores, dose-demand ratios and loading doses of morphine. However, in the combined treatment group, a significantly lower total consumption of morphine (P < 0.05), associated with a shorter duration of patient-controlled analgesia (P < 0.02) and a decreased mean number of unsuccessful demands (P < 0.001) were recorded. Intercostal blockade with bupivacaine-phenol supplements intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for post-cholecystectomy pain relief.     

A pharmacokinetic study of sublingual aerosolized morphine in healthy volunteers

A pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to compare the pharmacokinetics of morphine after an intravenous dose with the pharmacokinetics after a sublingual dose administered from an aerosol. Plasma levels of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide were measured in five normal volunteers after morphine administration by the intravenous route and from a novel sublingual pressurized aerosol formulation. The mean (+/- s.d.) bioavailability of the sublingual aerosol morphine was 19.7 +/- 6.7%. The morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine and the morphine-6-glucuronide/morphine ratios were 5.1 +/- 1.6 and 1.2 +/- 0.4, respectively, for the intravenous route and 28.3 +/- 11.3 and 5.2 +/- 1.4, respectively, for the sublingual route. The combined total areas under the plots of systemic concentration against time (AUC) for the metabolites after the two routes was not significantly different. When compared with published data for oral administration the results demonstrate that the sublingual aerosol morphine might provide an alternative to conventional methods of morphine delivery, and has similar pharmacokinetics to a sublingual morphine tablet. It has no particular pharmacokinetic advantages over oral morphine, except a potential for a faster onset of analgesia. Bioavailability, maximum plasma concentration, Cpmax, and the time at which the maximum plasma concentration is reached, Tmax, are equivalent to those for orally administered morphine.     

Peridural anesthesia versus subarachnoid anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To compare technical and clinical differences between epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 64 pregnant women at term scheduled for elective cesarean section. Two groups were randomized: A) PD Group (n = 32): continuous epidural anesthesia by administration of bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1/400,000 via an epidural catheter. Epidural morphine 3 mg was administered at the end of surgery. B) SP Group (n = 32): "single shot" spinal anesthesia by intrathecal administration of hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine 1-1.4 ml plus morphine 0.2 mg. The pin prick block level reached T2-T6 at incision time. DATA COLLECTION: 1) Time from the beginning of anesthesia to surgical incision. 2) Hypotension episodes. 3) Ephedrine consumption. 4) Intraoperative discomfort at delivery, traction and uterine manipulation, peritoneal toilette. 5) Nausea and vomiting. 6) Apgar score. 7) Postoperative headache. RESULTS: Women in the SP group had more hypotensive episodes (81% vs 53%: p < 0.05) and more ephedrine consumption with a large individual variability (29.12 mg +/- 20.4 vs 12.83 +/- 13.8: p < 0.01) when compared to PD group, without any difference in the Apgar score. The SP group required less time consumption (10.5 min. +/- 6.7 vs 35.9 min. +/- 17.3: p < 0.01) and had less intraoperative discomfort with less analgesic and/or sedative drugs consumption (9.7% vs 29%: p < 0.05) and less vomiting (3% vs 22.5%: p < 0.05). No postoperative headache was noticed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the described pharmacological and technical approach, spinal anesthesia is more suitable than continuous epidural technique for cesarean section, unless contraindicated.     

Rectal indomethacin potentiates spinal morphine analgesia after caesarean delivery

This double-blind, randomized study was designed to evaluate the use of indomethacin (Indocid, MSD) following caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia. Thirty ASA I-II women presenting for elective caesarean were recruited. Spinal anaesthesia was performed in a standard manner using hyperbaric bupivacaine, fentanyl and morphine. At the completion of surgery, subjects were administered two rectal suppositories, followed by 12-hourly suppositories for six doses (three days). The study group received 100 mg indomethacin suppositories and controls were given placebo (Anusol). Data collected included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and with movement, VAS scores for nausea and itch, and analgesic use. Demographic data were similar in the two groups. Median time to first analgesia (TTFA) was nine hours in the control group v. 39.5 hours in the indomethacin group (P < 0.003). Additional analgesic requests throughout the postoperative period were less in women who received indomethacin: 4 v 11 (P < 0.001). Women who received indomethacin had significantly less pain on the first postoperative day, especially on movement: mean VAS 1.4 v 5.1 (P < 0.00001). There were no reported adverse neonatal or maternal effects from the use of indomethacin. Rectal indomethacin use following caesarean delivery leads to significantly improved pain relief compared with placebo. The combination of spinal morphine and rectal indomethacin leads to high-quality postoperative analgesia.     

Observations on the zinc protoporphyrin/heme ratio in whole blood

The aim of this study was to examine whether severity of preoperative pain intensity is related to postoperative pain and morphine consumption. Sixty consecutive patients scheduled for total hip surgery during intrathecal anesthesia were studied. Preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and analgesic intake was assessed 1 day before surgery. Three groups of patients were identified: those with mild pain (n = 12, VAS score 0-4), moderate pain (n = 18, VAS score 4-7), and severe pain (n = 28, VAS score 7-10). Postoperative pain scores were recorded in the first 24 h, as was the amount of morphine delivered by the patient-controlled analgesia pump. There were no differences among the groups in VAS scores at any time. Severe preoperative pain levels correlated with significantly greater postoperative morphine intake. The mean morphine intake during the first 24 h postoperatively was 19.2 mg in the mild pain group, 21.2 mg in the moderate pain group, and 29.5 mg in the severe pain group (P < 0.05 compared with both other groups). We conclude that patients with severe preoperative pain self-medicate to achieve postoperative pain scores equivalent to those of patients with mild and moderate pain and require a greater postoperative morphine intake for adequate analgesia than patients with mild or moderate preoperative pain. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we showed that severity of preoperative pain intensity relates to postoperative pain levels and morphine consumption. Patients scheduled for total hip surgery with severe preoperative pain require more postoperative morphine in the first 24 h.     

Opioid-sparing effects of a low-dose infusion of naloxone in patient-administered morphine sulfate

BACKGROUND: A naloxone infusion is effective in reducing epidural and intrathecal opioid-related side effects. The use of naloxone infusion concomitant with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has not been evaluated, probably because of an expected direct antagonism of the systemic opioid effect. The authors compared the incidence of morphine-related side effects and the quality of analgesia from two small doses of naloxone infusion. METHODS: Sixty patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1, 2, or 3 who were scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomies were enrolled in the study. Patients received a standardized general anesthetic. In the postanesthetic care unit, patients received morphine as a PCA. They were randomized to receive either 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) naloxone (low dose), 1 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) (high dose), or saline (placebo) as a continuous infusion. Verbal rating scores for pain, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus; sedation scores; requests for antiemetic; and morphine use were recorded for 24 h. Blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation were also monitored. RESULTS: Sixty patients completed the study. Both naloxone doses were equally effective in reducing the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus compared with placebo (P < 0.05 by the chi-squared test). There was no difference in the verbal rating scores for pain between the groups. The cumulative morphine use was the lowest in the low-dose group (42.3 +/- 24.1 mg; means +/- SD) compared with the placebo (59.1 +/- 27.4 mg) and high-dose groups (64.7 +/- 33.0 mg) at 24 h (P < 0.05 by analysis of variance). There was no incidence of respiratory depression (<8 breaths/min) and no difference in sedation scores, antiemetic use, respiratory rate, and hemodynamic parameters among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone is effective in preventing PCA opioid-related side effects. Naloxone infusion at 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) not only attenuates these side effects but appears to reduce postoperative (beyond 4-8 h) opioid requirements. This dosing regimen can be prepared with 400 microg naloxone in 1,000 ml crystalloid given in 24 h to a patient weighing 70 kg.     

Comparison of pre- versus post-incision administration of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine in a rat model of postoperative pain

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies in experimental animals suggest that preemptive analgesia may improve postoperative pain management. The beneficial effects of preemptive analgesia appear less remarkable clinically. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of pre- and post-incision administration of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine in a rat model for postoperative pain. METHODS: Rats with intrathecal catheters were anesthetized with halothane, and the surgical field was prepared. A saline vehicle or the test drug was administered 15 min before an incision was made in the plantar aspect of the hindpaw or after the incision was completed. After recovery, mechanical hyperalgesia to punctate and nonpunctate stimuli was measured. Rats were tested on the day of surgery for the first 5 h and each day for 6 days. RESULTS: In saline vehicle-treated rats, the median withdrawal threshold decreased from 522 mN to 54 mN or less, and the response frequency to pressure from application of the plastic disc increased from 0 +/- 0% to 96 +/- 12% or greater after incision. Hyperalgesia was persistent through 2 days after surgery and then gradually returned toward preincision values over the next 4 days. Pre- or postincision administration of either intrathecal morphine or intrathecal bupivacaine reduced hyperalgesia on the day of surgery; at all subsequent times, there were no differences between the saline vehicle groups and the drug treatment groups. There were never any significant differences between pre- and postincision treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Early reduction in pain behaviors either by pre- or postincision management had no impact on subsequent measures of hyperalgesia in this model. These results agree with a number of clinical studies and suggest that incisional pain may be initiated and maintained differently than pain in other models.     

Decrease in isoflurane requirements and of postoperative pain with preanesthetic intrathecal morphine

OBJECTIVES: 1) To determine whether preanesthetic intrathecal administration of 0.5 mg morphine reduces isoflurane requirements for anesthetic maintenance. 2) To assess the duration of postoperative analgesia and the type and frequency of complications attributable to the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 45 adults were distributed into 3 groups of 15 patients each based on site of surgery and site of preanesthetic (30 min) injection of 0.5 mg pure morphine. Control group (C0) patients underwent lumbar surgery and received subcutaneous morphine. Group C0.5 patients also underwent lumbar surgery but received intrathecal morphine. Group A0.5 patients underwent long-duration high abdominal surgery and received intrathecal morphine. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide (60%) in oxygen (40%) and a variable concentration of isoflurane. Isoflurane needs were assessed by averaging six consecutive measurements of end-tidal isoflurane pressure (M30FETiso) taken at intervals of 5 min. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by means of a visual analog scale that was converted to numerical units (VASn). RESULTS: M30FETiso in group C0 (0.8%) was always higher (p < 0.01) than in the other two groups. M30FETiso in group A0.5 was higher (p < 0.01) than in group C0.5 during the first 150 min of surgery. After 180 min, there were no differences in M30FETiso (0.10-0.16%) between the two groups receiving intrathecal morphine. VASn results (mean +/- SD) in the first 4 hours were higher in group C0 (7.33 +/- 0.6) than in group C0.5 (1.13 +/- 0.35) and group A0.5 (1.07 +/- 0.26). The time of morphine-dependent analgesia was shorter (p < 0.01) in group C0 (0.62 +/- 0.38 hours) than in groups C0.5 (30.4 +/- 5.11 hours) and A0.5 (28 +/- 4.34 hours). There were no significant differences between the two groups receiving intrathecal morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Preanesthetic subarachnoid lumbar injection of 0.5 mg of pure morphine reduced early requirements for isoflurane in lumbar surgery (0.14% after 60 min). This reduction was initially less in patients undergoing abdominal surgery (0.44% at 60 min) but was the same after 150 min. Postoperative analgesia was long-term and independent of type or duration of surgery. There was no respiratory depression after surgery and the incidence of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups that received subarachnoid morphine.     

Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with opioid bupivacaine mixtures

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia of morphine or fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Forty ASA I-II patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were studied. After insertion of a lumbar epidural catheter, patients were given a non-opioid general anaesthetic. After surgery patients complaining of pain, received a loading dose of 2 mg morphine (Group I) or 50 micrograms fentanyl (Group II). For continuing pain, 1 mg morphine in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (0.25 mg.ml-1 morphine and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine, Group I) or 20 micrograms fentanyl in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (5 micrograms.ml-1 fentanyl and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine Group II) were administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 were monitored. Assessments of pain (VAS), nausea-vomiting, motor block, pruritus and sedation were recorded for 24 hr. RESULTS: No difference in pain or sedation was observed between groups. The 24 hr postoperative opioid consumption was 15.50 +/- 7.53 mg morphine and 555.10 +/- 183.85 micrograms fentanyl. Total bupivacaine 0.125% consumption was 58.00 +/- 30.14 ml in Group I and 101.05 +/- 36.77 ml in Group II. One patient in Group II complained of motor weakness in one leg. The incidence of nausea (Group I 45%, Group II 10% P < 0.05) and pruritus (Group I 30%, Group II 5% P < 0.05) was less in patients receiving fentanyl. CONCLUSION: Both methods were effective in the prevention of pain but, because of fewer side effects, fentanyl may be preferable to morphine.     

Intravenous regional analgesia using morphine. The effect on postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: We hypothesised that any peripheral action of morphine may contribute to improved postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of morphine administered preoperatively into an exsanguinated limb prior to total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, controlled study was performed in 50 patients having total knee arthroplasty surgery. Patients were divided into two groups. In the study group, 0.125 mg/kg morphine in 60 ml of saline was administered intravenously (iv) into the exsanguinated operative limb via a cannula in the foot. A saline intramuscular (im) injection was administered into the opposite leg. The control group received 60 ml saline iv into the operative leg and 0.125 mg/kg morphine im into the opposite leg. Pain was assessed postoperatively using a 10-point visual analogue scale and by comparing morphine requirements and demand:delivery ratios from a patient-controlled analgesic pump. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference between the groups in relation to any of the analgesic measures employed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous regional analgesia using morphine provides no analgesic advantage over the intramuscular route from 6-24 h postoperatively.     

Is there any clinical advantage of increasing the pre-emptive dose of morphine or combining pre-incisional with postoperative morphine administration?

Pre-emptive treatment with an i.v. infusion of morphine 10 mg at induction reduces postoperative analgesic requirement and wound hypersensitivity compared with the same dose administered at the end of operation. Increasing the dose of preemptive morphine may potentially reduce postoperative pain further, while administering morphine at the end of operation, in addition to the beginning, may reduce pain generated by the sensory activity elicited from the wound in the immediate postoperative period. To examine this we have conducted a randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy to compare the effect of morphine 20 mg administered before operation with 10 mg at induction and 10 mg on closure of the peritoneum. Postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue score (VAS) at rest and on movement and by total morphine consumption administered by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Wound sensitivity was assessed by von Frey pain thresholds. Both groups had similar morphine consumption, VAS scores and touch and pain thresholds, and in both, secondary hyperalgesia was prevented. Nausea and vomiting scores were higher in the 20-mg group. There was no significant difference between the two groups and neither regimen appeared to offer obvious clinical advantages compared with a lower dose (10 mg) morphine analgesic strategy. Therefore, there may be a ceiling effect to the production of pre-emptive analgesia by morphine.     

The peripheral effect of fentanyl on postoperative pain

The clinical value of the analgesic effect of opioids administered peripherally (except for intraarticular administration) has not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that fentanyl, added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration, can enhance postoperative analgesia via a peripheral mechanism. Patients with inguinal herniorrhaphy performed under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups (n = 10 each). At the end of surgery, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL of lidocaine 0.5% and fentanyl 0.001% (10 microg) in one group; in the other group, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL of lidocaine 0.5% alone (and fentanyl 10 microg IM contralaterally). The following variables were determined in a double-blind manner: the duration of anesthesia (response to a von Frey filament), the duration of analgesia (time to mild postoperative pain), postoperative meperidine consumption, intensity visual analog scale of spontaneous and movement-associated pain 24 h after surgery, and wound pain threshold 24 h after surgery (pressure algometry). The addition of fentanyl for wound infiltration enhanced the duration of anesthesia (130+/-37 vs 197+/-27 min; P < 0.001) and decreased the intensity of spontaneous (50+/-17 vs 19+/-18 mm; P < 0.002) and movement-associated (56+/-15 vs 26+/-21 mm; P < 0.002) pain 24 h postoperatively. Differences between groups for other variables were not statistically significant. Fentanyl added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration after spinal anesthesia can enhance postoperative analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. IMPLICATIONS: Fentanyl can enhance analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. Added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration, it may be of benefit for the relief of postoperative pain.