Morphology and properties of nylon 6 and high density polyethylene blends in presence of nanoclay and PE‐g‐MA

In this study, we report the synergistic effect of nanoclay and maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA) on the morphology and properties of (80/20 w/w) nylon 6/high density polyethylene (HDPE) blend. Polymer blend nanocomposites containing nanoclay with and without compatibilizer (PE‐g‐MA) were prepared by melt mixing, and their morphologies and structures were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and wide angle X‐ray diffractometer (WAXD) study. The size of phase‐separated domains decreased considerably with increasing content of nanoclay and PE‐g‐MA. WAXD study and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed the presence of exfoliated clay platelets in nylon 6 matrix, as well as, at the interface of the (80/20 w/w) nylon 6/HDPE blend–clay nanocomposites. Addition of PE‐g‐MA in the blend–clay nanocomposites enhanced the exfoliation of clays in nylon 6 matrix and especially at the interface. Thus, exfoliated clay platelets in nylon 6 matrix effectively restricted the coalescence of dispersed HDPE domains while PE‐g‐MA improved the adhesion between the phases at the interface. The use of compatibilizer and nanoclay in polymer blends may lead to a high performance material which combines the advantages of compatibilized polymer blends and the merits of polymer nanocomposites. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Effect of nanoclay on the morphology and properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/high‐density polyethylene blends

The effect of nanoclay on the morphology and properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) blends was studied. A scanning electron microscopy study of the PMMA/HDPE (70/30 w/w) blends with nanoclay indicated a reduction in the average domain sizes of the dispersed HDPE phase and, hence, a better extent of mixing compared to that of the blends without any nanoclay. An X‐ray diffraction study and transmission electron microscopy revealed the localization of intercalated nanoclay in the PMMA matrix of the PMMA/HDPE (70/30 w/w) blend. However, the same effect of clay was not observed in the PMMA/HDPE (30/70 w/w) blend when HDPE became the matrix. In the PMMA/HDPE (30/70 w/w) blend, the addition of nanoclay increased the domain size of the dispersed PMMA domains by preferential location of the clays inside the PMMA domains. The addition of polyethylene‐grafted maleic anhydride in both compositions of the PMMA/HDPE blend effectively reduced the domain size of the disperse phases in the blend. However, the presence of clay increased the tensile strength and storage modulus of the PMMA/HDPE blends in both blend compositions. Thus, in the PMMA/HDPE blend, the clay platelets acted as a effective compatibilizer as long as they were dispersed mainly in the matrix phase. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Phase structure and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/high‐density polyethylene based on recycled materials

Blends based on recycled high density polyethylene (R‐HDPE) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET) were made through reactive extrusion. The effects of maleated polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA), triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene (SEBS), and 4,4′‐methylenedi(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) on blend properties were studied. The 2% PE‐g‐MA improved the compatibility of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in all blends toughened by SEBS. For the R‐HDPE/R‐PET (70/30 w/w) blend toughened by SEBS, the dispersed PET domain size was significantly reduced with use of 2% PE‐g‐MA, and the impact strength of the resultant blend doubled. For blends with R‐PET matrix, all strengths were improved by adding MDI through extending the PET molecular chains. The crystalline behaviors of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in one‐phase rich systems influenced each other. The addition of PE‐g‐MA and SEBS consistently reduced the crystalline level (χ_c) of either the R‐PET or the R‐HDPE phase and lowered the crystallization peak temperature (T_c) of R‐PET. Further addition of MDI did not influence R‐HDPE crystallization behavior but lowered the χ_c of R‐PET in R‐PET rich blends. The thermal stability of R‐HDPE/R‐PET 70/30 and 50/50 (w/w) blends were improved by chain‐extension when 0.5% MDI was added. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Effect of core‐shell morphology evolution on the rheology,crystallization, and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE ternary blend

In this article, polyamide 6 (PA6), maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer (EPDM‐g‐MA), high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) were simultaneously added into an internal mixer to melt‐mixing for different periods. The relationship between morphology and rheological behaviors, crystallization, mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blends were studied. The phase morphology observation revealed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE (70/15/15 wt %) blend is constituted from PA6 matrix in which is dispersed core‐shell droplets of HDPE core encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase and indicated that the mixing time played a crucial role on the evolution of the core‐shell morphology. Rheological measurement manifested that the complex viscosity and storage modulus of ternary blends were notable higher than the pure polymer blends and binary blends which ascribed different phase morphology. Moreover, the maximum notched impact strength of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blend was 80.7 KJ/m² and this value was 10–11 times higher than that of pure PA6. Particularly, differential scanning calorimetry results indicated that the bulk crystallization temperature of HDPE (114.6°C) was partly weakened and a new crystallization peak appeared at a lower temperature of around 102.2°C as a result of co‐crystal of HDPE and EPDM‐g‐MA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Encapsulated phase structure and morphology evolution during quiescent annealing in ternary polymer blends with PA6 as matrix

This work is aim to study the encapsulated morphology development in ternary blends of polyamide 6/high density polyethylene/maleic anhydride‐grafted‐ethylene propylene diene monomer (PA6/HDPE/EPDM‐g‐MA) and polyamide 6/maleic anhydride‐grafted‐high density polyethylene/ethylene propylene diene monomer (PA6/HDPE‐g‐MA/EPDM) through thermodynamically control described by Harkins spreading theory. The phase morphology was confirmed by using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and selective solvent extraction revealed that PA6/HDPE/EPDM‐g‐MA blend having a composition of 70/15/15 vol % is constituted of polyamide 6 matrix with dispersed composite droplets of HDPE subinclusions encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase, while for PA6/HDPE‐g‐MA/EPDM blend with the same composition is constituted of polyamide 6 matrix with dispersed composite droplets of HDPE‐g‐MA subinclusions encapsulated by EPDM phase. Quiescent annealing test revealed that for PA6/HDPE/EPDM‐g‐MA blend, a perfect core–shell structure with one HDPE particle encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase was formed during annealing, and for PA6/HDPE‐g‐MA/EPDM blend, a novel complete inverting HDPE‐g‐MA/EPDM core/shell structure was achieved. Moreover, quantitative analysis about coalescent behaviors of HDPE‐g‐MA and HDPE subinclusions during quiescent annealing were investigated by image analysis and the result suggested that the grafted maleic anhydride group in HDPE‐g‐MA, acted as a role of steric repulsion, could suppress coalescence effects, thus leaded to a lower coalescent rate than that of HDPE subinclusions. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 39937.     

Gasoline permeation behavior and mechanical properties of polyamide 6/nanoclay,polyamide 6/PE‐g‐maleic anhydride blend,and polyamide 6/PE‐g‐maleic anhydride/clay nanocomposite

In this article, polyamide 6 (PA6)/clay nanocomposites, PA6/polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MA) blends, and PA6/PE‐g‐MA/clay nanocomposites were prepared and their gasoline permeation behavior and some mechanical properties were investigated. In PA6/clay nanocomposites, cloisite 30B was used as nanoparticles, with weight percentages of 1, 3, and 5. The blends of PA6/PE‐g‐MA were prepared with PE‐g‐MA weight percents of 10, 20, and 30. All samples were prepared via melt mixing technique using a twin screw extruder. The results showed that the lowest gasoline permeation occurred when using 3 wt % of nanoclay in PA6/clay nanocomposites, and 10 wt % of PE‐g‐MA in PA6/PE‐g‐MA blends. Therefore, a sample of PA6/PE‐g‐MA/clay nanocomposite containing 3 wt % of nanoclay and 10 wt % of PE‐g‐MA was prepared and its gasoline permeation behavior was investigated. The results showed that the permeation amount of PA6/PE‐g‐MA/nanoclay was 0.41 g m^?2 day^?1, while this value was 0.46 g m^?2 day^?1 for both of PA6/3wt % clay nanocomposite and PA6/10 wt % PE‐g‐MA blend. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40150.     

Melt rheology and morphology of uncompatibilized and in situ compatibilized nylon‐6/ethylene propylene rubber blends

Melt rheology and morphology of nylon‐6/ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) blends were studied as a function of composition, temperature, and compatibilizer loading. Uncompatibilized blends with higher nylon‐6 content (N90 and N95) and rubber content (N5 and N10) had viscosities approximately intermediate between those of the component polymers. A very clear negative deviation was observed in the viscosity–composition curve over the entire shear rate range studied for blends having composition N30, N50, and N70. This was associated with the interlayer slip resulting from the high‐level incompatibility between the component polymers. The lack of compatibility was confirmed by fracture surface morphology, given that the dispersed domains showed no sign of adhesion to the matrix. The phase morphology studies indicated that EPR was dispersed as spherical inclusions in the nylon matrix up to 30 wt % of its concentration. A cocontinuous morphology was observed between 30 and 50 wt % nylon and a phase inversion beyond 70 wt % nylon. Various models based on viscosity ratios were used to predict the region of phase inversion. Experiments were also carried out on in situ compatibilization using maleic anhydride–modified EPR (EPR‐g‐MA). In this reactive compatibilization strategy, the maleic anhydride groups of modified EPR reacted with the amino end groups of nylon. This reaction produced a graft copolymer at the blend interface, which in fact acted as the compatibilizer. The viscosity of the blend was found to increase when a few percent of modified EPR was added; at higher concentrations the viscosity leveled off, indicating a high level of interaction at the interface. Morphological investigations indicated that the size of the dispersed phase initially decreased when a few percent of the graft copolymer was added followed by a clear leveling off at higher concentration. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 252–264, 2004     

Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on compatibilization and properties of nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 blends

Effects of a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) on compatibilization and mechanical properties of nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 blends were investigated. The results showed that addition of SEBS‐g‐MA could improve the compatibility between nylon‐12,12 and nylon‐6. Nylon‐12,12 could disperse very well in nylon‐6 matrix, although the dispersion of nylon‐6 was poor when nylon‐6 was the dispersed phase. At a fixed nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 ratio of 30/70, supertoughness was achieved with addition of 15% SEBS‐g‐MA in weight. Scanning electron microscopy of the impact‐fractured surface indicated that cavitation and matrix shear yielding were the predominant mechanisms of impact energy dissipation. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1446–1453, 2004     

Effects of different compatibilizers on the rheological,thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE blend‐based nanocomposites

The influence of two different compatibilizers and their combination (maleic anhydride grafted high density polyethylene, HDPE‐g‐MA; maleic anhydride grafted linear low density polyethylene, LLDPE‐g‐MA; and 50/50 wt % mixture of these compatibilizers) on the rheological, thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE/organoclay blend‐based nanocomposites was evaluated. Nanocomposites were obtained by melt‐intercalation in a torque rheometer in two steps. Masterbatches (compatibilizer/nanoclay 2:1) were obtained and subsequently diluted in the HDPE/LLDPE matrix producing nanocomposites with 2.5 wt % of nanoclay. Wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), steady‐state rheological properties, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to determine the influence of different compatibilizer systems on intercalation and/or exfoliation process which occurs preferentially in the amorphous phase, and thermomechanical properties. The LLDPE‐g‐MA with a high melt index (and consequently low viscosity and crystallinity) was an effective compatibilizer for this system. Furthermore, the compatibilized nanocomposites with LLDPE‐g‐MA or mixture of HDPE‐g‐MA and LLDPE‐g‐MA exhibited better nanoclay's dispersion and distribution with stronger interactions between the matrix and the nanoclay. These results indicated that the addition of maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene facilitates both, the exfoliation and/or intercalation of the clays and its adhesion to HDPE/LLDPE blend. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 1726–1735, 2013     

The preparation and properties of compatibilized nylon 6/ABS blends using functionalized polybutadiene. Part I: Impact properties

The impact behaviors of nanoclay filled nylon 6 (nano‐nylon 6) or nylon 6 blended with poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) terpolymers (ABS) were investigated here using polybutadiene grafted maleic anhydride (PB‐g‐MA) as a compatibilizer to enhance interphase interaction. It is found that impact strength increases slightly for nano‐nylon 6/ABS blend system with the addition of compatibilizer at various ABS compositions, but increases to a certain degree for nylon 6/ABS case. Similar effects are also found with decreasing test temperature, especially at a blend composition of 80/20. These discrepancies are attributed to a different degree of available reaction sites from amine group on nano‐nylon 6 and nylon 6 as well as the rigidity of clay in deteriorating toughness. As for thermal properties, the heat distortion temperature shows marginally decrease in the nano‐nylon 6/ABS blend. Through morphology observations, the etched ABS particle sizes tend to decrease with the additions of compatibilizer for both blends, but are larger with higher contents of ABS concentrations. Those observations account for impact behaviors of the investigated blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:1461–1470, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Poly(ethylene‐graft‐ethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO) and poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) as compatibilizers in blends of LDPE and polyamide‐6

In a blend of two immiscible polymers a controlled morphology can be obtained by adding a block or graft copolymer as compatibilizer. In the present work blends of low‐density polyethylene (PE) and polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) were prepared by melt mixing the polymers in a co‐rotating, intermeshing twin‐screw extruder. Poly(ethylene‐graft‐polyethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO), synthesized from poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) (backbone) and poly(ethylene oxide) monomethyl ether (MPEO) (grafts), was added as compatibilizer. As a comparison, the unmodified backbone polymer, PEAA, was used. The morphology of the blends was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Melting and crystallization behavior of the blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and mechanical properties by tensile testing. The compatibilizing mechanisms were different for the two copolymers, and generated two different blend morphologies. Addition of PE‐PEO gave a material with small, well‐dispersed PA‐spheres having good adhesion to the PE matrix, whereas PEAA generated a morphology characterized by small PA‐spheres agglomerated to larger structures. Both compatibilized PE/PA blends had much improved mechanical properties compared with the uncompatibilized blend, with elongation at break (ε_b) increasing up to 200%. Addition of compatibilizer to the PE/PA blends stabilized the morphology towards coalescence and significantly reduced the size of the dispersed phase domains, from an average diameter of 20 μm in the unmodified PE/PA blend to approximately 1 μm in the compatibilized blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2416–2424, 2000     

Structural,thermal, and gas transport properties of HDPE/LLDPE blend‐based nanocomposites using a mixture of HDPE‐g‐MA and LLDPE‐g‐MA as compatibilizer

Nanocomposites based on high density polyethylene (HDPE)/linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) blend were prepared by melt compounding in a twin‐screw extruder using organoclay (montmorillonite) as nano‐filler and a 50/50 wt% mixture of maleic anhydride functionalized high density polyethylene (HDPE‐g‐MA) and linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE‐g‐MA) as the compatibilizing system. The addition of a maleated polyethylene‐based compatibilizing system was required to improve the organoclay dispersion in the HDPE/LLDPE blend‐based nanocomposite. In this work, the relationships between thermal properties, gas transport properties, and morphology were correlated. The compatibilized nanocomposite exhibited an intercalated morphology with a small number of individual platelets dispersed in the HDPE/LLDPE matrix, leading to an significant decrease in the oxygen permeation coefficient of the nanocomposites. A decrease in the carbon dioxide permeability and oxygen permeability with increase of nanoclay was observed for the compatibilized nanocomposites. The carbon dioxide permeability of the compatibilized nanocomposites was lower than the carbon dioxide permeability of the uncompatibilized nanocomposites even with the low intrinsic barrier properties of the compatibilizer. These effects were attributed to a good dispersion of the inorganic filler, good wettability of the filler by the polymer matrix, and strong interactions at the interface that increased the tortuous path for diffusion. Theoretical permeability models were used to estimate the final aspect ratio of nanoclay in the nanocomposite and showed good agreement with the aspect ratio obtained directly from TEM images. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:765–775, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Toughening and compatibilization of polypropylene/polyamide‐6 blends with a maleated–grafted ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate

In this article, maleated–grafted ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MA) was used as the interfacial modifier for polypropylene/polyamide‐6 (PP/PA6) blends, and effects of its concentration on the mechanical properties and the morphology of blends were investigated. It was found that the addition of EVA‐g‐MA improved the compatibility between PP and PA6 and resulted in a finer dispersion of dispersed PA6 phase. In comparison with uncompatibilized PP/PA6 blend, a significant reduction in the size of dispersed PA6 domain was observed. Toluene‐etched micrographs confirmed the formation of interfacial copolymers. Mechanical measurement revealed that the addition of EVA‐g‐MA markedly improved the impact toughness of PP/PA6 blend. Fractograph micrographs revealed that matrix shear yielding began to occur when EVA‐g‐MA concentration was increased upto 18 wt %. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99:3300–3307, 2006     

Blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 toughened by maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers: Mechanical properties,morphology, and rheology

Poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 (PPO/PA6 30/70) blends were impact modified by addition of three kinds of maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers, i.e., maleated styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), maleated methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (MBS‐g‐MA), and maleated acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA). The mechanical properties, morphology and rheological behavior of the impact modified PPO/PA6 blends were investigated. The selective location of the maleated copolymers in one phase or at interface accounted for the different toughening effects of the maleated copolymer, which is closely related to their molecular structure and composition. SEBS‐g‐MA was uniformly dispersed in PPO phase and greatly toughened PPO/PA6 blends even at low temperature. MBS‐g‐MA particles were mainly dispersed in the PA6 phase and around the PPO phase, resulting in a significant enhancement of the notched Izod impact strength of PPO/PA6 blends from 45 J/m to 281 J/m at the MBS‐g‐MA content of 20 phr. In comparison, the ABS‐g‐MA was mainly dispersed in PA6 phase without much influencing the original mechanical properties of the PPO/PA6 blend. The different molecule structure and selective location of the maleated copolymers in the blends were reflected by the change of rheological behavior as well. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Effects of maleated syndiotactic polystyrene on the morphology,mechanical properties,and crystallization behavior of syndiotactic polystyrene/polyamide 6 blends

The compatibilization of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)/polyamide 6 (PA‐6) blends with maleic anhydride grafted syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS‐g‐MA) as a reactive compatibilizer was investigated. The sPS/PA‐6 blends were in situ compatibilized by a reaction between the maleic anhydride (MA) of sPS‐g‐MA and the amine end group of PA‐6. The occurrence of the chemical reaction was substantiated by the disappearance of a characteristic MA peak from the Fourier transform infrared spectrum. Morphology observations showed that the size of the dispersed PA‐6 domains was significantly reduced and that the interfacial adhesion was much improved by the addition of sPS‐g‐MA. As a result of reactive compatibilization, the impact strengths of the sPS/PA‐6 blends increased with an increase in the sPS‐g‐MA content. The crystallization behaviors of the blends were affected by the compatibilization effect of sPS‐g‐MA. A single melting peak of sPS in the noncompatibilized blend was gradually split into two peaks as the amount of the compatibilizer increased. A single crystallization peak of PA‐6 in the noncompatibilized blend became two peaks with the addition of 3 wt % sPS‐g‐MA. The new peak was a result of the fractionation crystallization. As the amount of sPS‐g‐MA increased, the intensity of the new peak increased, and the original peak nearly disappeared. Finally, the crystallization peak of PA‐6 disappeared with 20 wt % sPS‐g‐MA in the blend. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 2502–2506, 2003     

Study on the microstructures and mechanical behaviour of compatibilized polypropylene/polyamide‐6 blends

A series of blends of polypropylene (PP)–polyamide‐6 (PA6) with either reactive polyethylene–octene elastomer (POE) grafted with maleic anhydride (POE‐g‐MA) or with maleated PP (PP‐g‐MA) as compatibilizers were prepared. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the blends were investigated by means of tensile and impact testing and by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The results indicated that the miscibility of PP–PA6 blends was improved with the addition of POE‐g‐MA and PP‐g‐MA. For the PP/PA6/POE‐g‐MA system, an elastic interfacial POE layer was formed around PA6 particles and the dispersed POE phases were also observed in the PP matrix. Its Izod impact strength was four times that of pure PP matrix, whilst the tensile strength and Young's modulus were almost unchanged. The greatest tensile strength was obtained for PP/PA6/PP‐g‐MA blend, but its Izod impact strength was reduced in comparison with the pure PP matrix. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Photobiodegradation of low‐density polyethylene/banana starch films

The effects of the starch content, photosensitizer content, and compatibilizer on the photobiodegradability of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and banana starch polymer blend films were investigated. The compatibilizer and photosensitizer used in the films were PE‐graft‐maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MA) and benzophenone, respectively. Dried banana starch at 0–20% (w/w) of LDPE, benzophenone at 0–1% (w/w) of LDPE, and PE‐g‐MA at 10% (w/w) of banana starch were added to LDPE. The photodegradation of the blend films was performed with outdoor exposure. The progress of the photodegradation was followed by determining the carbonyl index derived from Fourier transform IR measurements and the changes in tensile properties. Biodegradation of the blend films was investigated by a soil burial test. The biodegradation process was followed by measuring the changes in the physical appearance, weight loss, and tensile properties of the films. The results showed that both photo‐ and biodegradation rates increased with increasing amounts of banana starch, whereas the tensile properties of the films decreased. The blends with higher amounts of benzophenone showed higher rates of photodegradation, although their biodegradation rates were reduced with an increase in benzophenone content. The addition of PE‐g‐MA into polymer blends led to an increase in the tensile properties whereas the photobiodegradation was slightly decreased compared to the films without PE‐g‐MA. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 2725–2736, 2006     

Cocontinuous phase morphology of asymmetric compositions of polypropylene/high‐density polyethylene blend by the addition of clay

A novel method of developing cocontinuous morphology in 75/25 and 80/20 w/w polypropylene/high density polyethylene (PP/HDPE) blends in the presence of small amount (0.5 phr) of organoclay has been reported. SEM study indicated a reduction in average domain sizes (D) of disperse HDPE when PP, HDPE, and the organoclay were melt‐blended simultaneously at 200°C. However, when the two‐sequential heating protocol was employed, (that is, the organoclay was first intercalated by HDPE chains at 150°C, followed by melt blending of PP at 200°C), very interestingly a cocontinuous morphology was found even for very asymmetric blend compositions. WAXD study revealed the intercalation of both PP and HDPE chains inside the clay galleries, when PP/HDPE and clay were melt‐mixed together at 200°C. However, when the two‐sequential heating protocol was used the organoclay platelets were selectively intercalated by the HDPE chains. Addition of SEPS in the blend decreased the D of HDPE domains in both the blending methods. Thus, the observed cocontinuous morphology in asymmetric composition of PP/HDPE blend in presence of clay is because of the barrier effect of the clay platelets in the HDPE phase that restrict the phase inversion into the domain/matrix morphology. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Toughened poly(trimethylene terephthalate) by blending with a functionalized ethylene–propylene–diene copolymer

A series of blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) with ethylene–propylene–diene copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (EPDM‐g‐MA) were prepared in composition by weight 95/5, 90/10, 80/20, and 70/30. Their morphologies, crystallization behavior, and mechanical properties were investigated. Morphology observation shows the well‐dispersed domains of EPDM‐g‐MA in PTT matrix with weight‐average particle size from 0.98 to 3.64 μm when the EPDM‐g‐MA content increases from 5% to 30% (mass fraction) in the blends. The constancy of the crystallinity level indicates that the elastomeric phase does not disturb the crystallization process of PTT. The addition of rubbery EPDM‐g‐MA to PTT matrix increases the notched Izod impact strength, but impairs the tensile strength properties. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Alteration of the mechanical and thermal properties of nylon 6/nylon 6,6 blends by nanoclay

Nylon 6 [N(6)], nylon 6,6 [N(6,6)], and their blends at different clay loadings were prepared. The mix was melted and injected into strip‐shaped samples. Mechanical and thermal analyses were performed to investigate the effect of blending and the incorporated clay on the mechanical and thermal properties. Enhancements in the Young's modulus and hardness were obtained for all of the nanocomposites, with a 55% increase in Young's modulus after the addition of 6 wt % nanoclay, although the improvement in tensile strength depended on the blend ratio, with greatest effects on the 50% N(6)/50% N(6,6) blend with increases of 44 and 59% for 2 and 4% clay loadings, respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis showed an enhancement in the thermal properties in the 50% N(6)/50% N(6,6) blend at 2% clay loading, and the blend exhibited ductile behavior at this loading. Increases in the crystallization peak temperatures of 10–15° in N(6,6) and the two blends 30% N(6)/70% N(6,6) and 50% N(6)/50% N(6,6) were observed after the addition of the clay. The nanoclay enhanced the γ‐/β‐form crystals in N(6) and N(6,6) neat polymers and also in the blends. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy FT‐IR revealed the formation of hydrogen bonding and the possible formation of ionic bonds between the polymers and the nanoclay, which resulted in enhancements in the mechanical properties of the blends. The distribution of the nanoclay in the blend was well dispersed, as shown by X‐ray diffraction analysis. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012