Thermal properties of blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate‐co‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Thermal properties of blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate‐co‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) prepared by solution casting were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. In the study of PHBV‐SAN blends by differential scanning calorimetry, glass transition temperature and melting point of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends were almost unchanged compared with those of the pure PHBV. This result indicates that the blends of PHBV and SAN are immiscible. However, crystallization temperature of the PHBV in the blends decreased approximately 9–15°. From the results of the Avrami analysis of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends, crystallization rate constant of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends decreased compared with that of the pure PHBV. From the above results, it is suggested that the nucleation of PHBV in the blends is suppressed by the addition of SAN. From the measured crystallization half time and degree of supercooling, interfacial free energy for the formation of heterogeneous nuclei of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends was calculated and found to be 2360 (mN/m)³ for the pure PHBV and 2920–3120 (mN/m)³ for the blends. The values of interfacial free energy indicate that heterogeneity of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends is deactivated by the SAN. This result is consistent with the results of crystallization temperature and crystallization rate constant of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 673–679, 2000     

Miscibility and crystallization kinetics of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization kinetics of the blends of random poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) [P(HB‐co‐HV)] copolymer and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends were miscible in the melt. Thus the single glass‐transition temperature (T_g) of the blends within the whole composition range suggests that P(HB‐co‐HV) and PMMA were totally miscible for the miscible blends. The equilibrium melting point (T°_m) of P(HB‐co‐HV) in the P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends decreased with increasing PMMA. The T°_m depression supports the miscibility of the blends. With respect to the results of crystallization kinetics, it was found that both the spherulitic growth rate and the overall crystallization rate decreased with the addition of PMMA. The kinetics retardation was attributed to the decrease in P(HB‐co‐HV) molecular mobility and dilution of P(HB‐co‐HV) concentration resulting from the addition of PMMA, which has a higher T_g. According to secondary nucleation theory, the kinetics of spherulitic crystallization of P(HB‐co‐HV) in the blends was analyzed in the studied temperature range. The crystallizations of P(HB‐co‐HV) in P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends were assigned to n = 4, regime III growth process. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3595–3603, 2004     

Preparation and electrochemical capacitance of poly(pyrrole‐co‐aniline)

The copolymer of pyrrole and aniline, poly(pyrrole‐co‐aniline), has been prepared by chemical oxidation of corresponding monomer mixtures with ammonium peroxysulfate. Techniques of FTIR, SEM‐EDS, and BET surface area measurement were used to characterize the structure and morphology of the copolymer. The electrochemical properties of the copolymer were investigated by cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge‐discharge, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The results indicated that poly(pyrrole‐co‐aniline) was about 100–300 nm in diameter and showed better electrochemical capacitive performance than polypyrrole and polyaniline. The specific capacitance of the copolymer electrode was 827 F/g at a current of 8 mA/cm² in 1 mol/L Na₂SO₄ electrolyte. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Tailoring the surface architecture of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐4‐hydroxybutyrate) scaffolds

This study was designed to determine whether the surface modifications of the various poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐4‐hydroxybutyrate) [P(3HB‐co‐4HB)] copolymer scaffolds fabricated would enhance mouse fibroblast cells (L929) attachment and proliferation. The P(3HB‐co‐4HB) copolymer with a wide range of 4HB monomer composition (16–91 mol %) was synthesized by a local isolate Cupriavidus sp. USMAA1020 by employing the modified two‐stage cultivation and by varying the concentrations of 4HB precursors, namely γ‐butyrolactone and 1,4‐butanediol. Five different processing techniques were used in fabricating the P(3HB‐co‐4HB) copolymer scaffolds such as solvent casting, salt‐leaching, enzyme degradation, combining salt‐leaching with enzyme degradation, and electrospinning. The increase in 4HB composition lowered melting temperatures (T_m) but increased elongation to break. P(3HB‐co‐91 mol % 4HB) exhibited a melting point of 46°C and elongation to break of 380%. The atomic force analysis showed an increase in the average surface roughness as the 4HB monomer composition increased. The mouse fibroblasts (L929) cell attachment was found to increase with high 4HB monomer composition in copolymer scaffolds. These results illustrate the importance of a detailed characterization of surface architecture of scaffolds to provoke specific cellular responses. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Interpolymer‐specific interactions and miscibility in poly(styrene‐co‐acrylic acid)/poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) blends

The miscibility or complexation of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylic acid) containing 27 mol % of acrylic acid (SAA‐27) and poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) containing 17 or 32 mol % of N,N‐dimethylacrylamide (SAD‐17, SAD‐32) or poly(N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) (PDMA) were investigated by different techniques. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis showed that a single glass‐transition temperature was observed for all the mixtures prepared from tetrahydrofuran (THF) or butan‐2‐one. This is an evidence of their miscibility or complexation over the entire composition range. As the content of the basic constituent increases as within SAA‐27/SAD‐32 and SAA‐27/PDMA, higher number of specific interpolymer interactins occurred and led to the formation of interpolymer complexes in butan‐2‐one. The qualitative Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy study carried out for SAA‐27/SAD‐17 blends revealed that hydrogen bonding occurred between the hydroxyl groups of SAA‐27 and the carbonyl amide of SAD‐17. Quantitative analysis carried out in the 160–210°C temperature range for the SAA‐27 copolymer and its blends of different ratios using the Painter–Coleman association model led to the estimation of the equilibrium constants K₂, K_A and the enthalpies of hydrogen bond formation. These blends are miscible even at 180°C as confirmed from the negative values of the total free energy of mixing ΔG_M over the entire blend composition. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1011–1024, 2007     

Antistatic performance and morphological observation of ternary blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(ether esteramide), and ionomers

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly (ether esteramide) (PEEA), which is known as an ion conductive polymer, were prepared by melt mixing using a twin screw extruder. Antistatic performance of the molded plaques and the effects of adding ionomers such as lithium neutralized poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) copolymer(E/MAA‐Li), magnesium neutralized poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) copolymer(E/MAA‐Mg), and zinc neutralized poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) copolymer (E/MAA‐Zn) were investigated. Antistatic effect of adding poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) copolymer(E/MAA) and polystyrene, and poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) into PET/PEEA blends were also investigated. Here we confirmed that lithium ionomer worked the most effectively in those blend systems. We also confirmed that E/MAA worked to enhance the antistatic performance of PET/PEEA blends. Morphological study of these ternary blends system was conducted by TEM. Specific interaction between PEEA and E/MAA‐Li, and E/MAA were observed. Those ionomers and copolymer domains were encapsulated by PEEA, which could increase the surface area of PEEA in PET matrix. This encapsulation effect explains the unexpected synergy for the static dissipation performance on addition of ionomers and E/MAA to PET/PEEA blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization,morphology, and electrical properties of bio‐based poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether esteramide)/ionomer blends

Bio‐based poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(ether esteramide) (PEEA) blends were prepared by melt processing with varying weight ratios (0–20 wt %) of ionomers such as lithium‐neutralized poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) copolymer (EMAA‐Li) and sodium‐neutralized poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) copolymer (EMAA‐Na). The blends were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), polarized light microscopy (PLM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). DSC and PLM results showed that EMAA‐Na increased the crystallization rate for PTT significantly, whereas EMAA‐Li did not enhance the crystallization rate at all. Specific interactions between PEEA and ionomers were confirmed by DSC and TEM. Electrostatic performance was also investigated for those PTT blends because PEEA is known as an ion‐conductive polymer. Here, we confirmed that both sodium and lithium ionomers work as a synergist to enhance the static decay performance of PTT/PEEA blends. Morphological study of these ternary blends systems was conducted by TEM. Dispersed ionomer domains were encapsulated by PEEA, which increases the interfacial surface area between PEEA and the PTT matrix. This encapsulation effect explains the unexpected synergy for the static dissipation performance on addition of ionomers to PTT/PEEA blends. This core–shell morphology can be predicted by calculating spreading coefficient for the ternary blends. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Crystallization and melting behavior of blends comprising poly(3‐hydroxy butyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxy valerate) and poly(ethylene oxide)

Blends of poly(3‐hydroxy butyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxy valerate) (PHBV) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were prepared by casting from chloroform solutions. Crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of blends have been studied by differential scanning calorimetry and optical polarizing microscopy. Experimental results reveal that the constituents are miscible in the amorphous state. They form separated crystal structures in the solid state. Crystallization behavior of the blends was studied under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. Owing to the large difference in melting temperatures, the constituents crystallize consecutively in blends; however, the process is affected by the respective second component. PHBV crystallizes from the amorphous mixture of the constituents, at temperatures where the PEO remains in the molten state. PEO, on the other hand, is surrounded during its crystallization process by crystalline PHBV regions. The degree of crystallinity in the blends stays constant for PHBV and decreases slightly for PEO, with ascending PHBV content. The rate of crystallization of PHBV decreases in blends as compared to the neat polymer. The opposite behavior is observed for PEO. Nonisothermal crystallization is discussed in terms of a quasi‐isothermal approach. Qualitatively, the results show the same tendencies as under isothermal conditions. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 2776–2783, 2006     

Melting behavior and surface morphology of poly(vinyl acetate‐co‐vinyl alcohol) copolymer

In a study of the surface morphology of commercial poly(vinyl acetate‐co‐vinyl alcohol) (ACA copolymer) with different percents of hydrolysis, different structures like fibrils, spherulites, micelles, vesicles, and spheroids were seen. The copolymer was crystallized by annealing at two different temperatures. The morphology of the polymer after crystallization and also without crystallization was studied. A decrease in the melting temperature just by heating to the melting temperature was observed, and for a detailed study, repetitive heating of the copolymer was carried out and changes in the mass and heat of fusion after every heating was recorded. The morphology of the copolymer after repetitive heating was studied. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1211–1218, 2002     

Specific interactions in poly(styrene‐co‐2‐hydroxyethyl acrylate)/poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) systems

Amphiphilic copolymers of poly(styrene‐co‐2‐hydroxyethyl acrylate) (SHEA) and poly(styrene‐co‐N, N‐dimethylacrylamide) (SAD) of different compositions were prepared by free radical copolymerization and characterized by different techniques. Depending on the nature of the solvent and the densities of interacting species incorporated within the polystyrene matrices, novel materials as blends or interpolymer complexes with properties different from those of their constituents were elaborated when these copolymers are mixed together. The specific interpolymer interactions of hydrogen bonding type and the phase behavior of the elaborated materials were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infra red spectroscopy (FTIR). The specific interactions of hydrogen bonding type that occurred within the SHEA and within their blends with the SAD were evidenced by FTIR qualitatively by the appearance of a new band at 1626 cm^?1 and quantitatively using appropriate spectral curve fitting in the carbonyl and amide regions. The variation of the glass transition temperature with the blend composition behaved differently with the densities of interacting species. The thermal degradation behavior of the materials was studied by thermogravimetry. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and their copolymers poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate) (PBET) containing 70/30, 65/35 and 60/40 molar ratios of 1,4‐butanediol/ethylene glycol were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at crystallization temperatures (T_c) which were 35–90 °C below equilibrium melting temperature . Although these copolymers contain both monomers in high proportion, DSC data revealed for copolymer crystallization behaviour. The reason for such copolymers being able to crystallize could be due to the similar chemical structures of 1,4‐butanediol and ethylene glycol. DSC results for isothermal crystallization revealed that random copolymers had a lower degree of crystallinity and lower crystallite growth rate than those of homopolymers. DSC heating scans, after completion of isothermal crystallization, showed triple melting endotherms for all these polyesters, similar to those of other polymers as reported in the literature. The crystallization isotherms followed the Avrami equation with an exponent n of 2–2.5 for PET and 2.5–3.0 for PBT and PBETs. Analyses of the Lauritzen–Hoffman equation for DSC isothermal crystallization data revealed that PBT and PET had higher growth rate constant G_o, and nucleation constant K_g than those of PBET copolymers. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Melt characteristics,mechanical, and thermal properties of blown film from modified blends of poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) and poly(lactide)

Blown films from poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) and poly(lactide) (PLA) blends were investigated. The blends were prepared in a twin‐screw extruder, in the presence of small amounts of dicumyl peroxide (DCP). The influence of DCP concentration on film blowing, rheological, mechanical, and thermal properties of the blends is reported in this article. Rheological results showed a marked increase in polymer melt strength and elasticity with the addition of DCP. As a consequence, the film homogeneity and the stability of the bubble were improved. The modified blend films, compared with the unmodified blend, showed an improvement in tensile strength and modulus with a slight loss in elongation. Fourier transform infrared and gel results revealed that chain scission and branching were more significant than crosslinking when the DCP loadings in the blends were not higher than 0.7%. A reduction in melt temperatures of PLA was observed due to difficulty in chain crystallization. The concentrations of DCP strongly affected the melting temperatures but had an insignificant effect on the decomposition behavior of the blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (P(HB‐co‐HV))/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) blends have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that P(HB‐co‐HV)/PVAc blends were miscible in the melt over the whole compositions. Thus the blend exhibited a single glass transition temperature (T_g), which increased with increasing PVAc composition. The spherulitic morphologies of P(HB‐co‐HV)/PVAc blends indicated that the PVAc was predominantly segregated into P(HB‐co‐HV) interlamellar or interfibrillar regions during P(HB‐co‐HV) crystallization because of the volume‐filled spherulites. As to the crystallization kinetics study, it was found that the overall crystallization and crystal growth rates decreased with the addition of PVAc. The kinetics retardation was primarily attributed to the reduction of chain mobility and dilution of P(HB‐co‐HV) upon mixing with higher T_g PVAc. The overall crystallization rate was predominantly governed by the spherulitic growth rate and promoted by the samples treated with the quenched state because of the higher nucleation density. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 980–988, 2006     

Poly(para‐dioxanone)/poly(D,L‐lactide) blends compatibilized with poly(D,L‐lactide‐co‐para‐dioxanone)

The effect of poly(D ,L ‐lactide‐co‐para‐dioxanone) (PLADO) as the compatibilizer on the properties of the blend of poly(para‐dioxanone) (PPDO) and poly(D ,L ‐lactide) (PDLLA) has been investigated. The 80/20 PPDO/PDLLA blends containing from 1% to 10% of random copolymer PLADO were prepared by solution coprecipitation. The PLADO component played a very important role in determining morphology, thermal, mechanical, and hydrophilic properties of the blends. Addition of PLADO into the blends could enhance the compatibility between dispersed PDLLA phase and PPDO matrix; the boundary between the two phases became unclear and even the smallest holes were not detected. On the other hand, the position of the T_g was composition dependent; when 5% PLADO was added into blend, the T_g distance between PPDO and PDLLA was shortened. The blends with various contents of compatibilizer had better mechanical properties compared with simple PPDO/PDLLA binary polymer blend, and such characteristics further improved as adding 5% random copolymers. The maximum observed tensile strength was 29.05 MPa for the compatibilized PPDO/PDLLA blend with 5% PLADO, whereas tensile strength of the uncompatibilized PPDO/PDLLA blend was 14.03 MPa, which was the lowest tensile strength. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (abbreviated as PSAN) containing 25 wt % of acrylonitrile in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PSAN. The aPMMA/PSAN and sPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs). The glass transition temperatures of the two miscible blends were fitted well by the Fox equation, and no broadening of the glass transition regions was observed. The iPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be immiscible, because most of the cast films were translucent and had two glass transition temperatures. Through the use of a simple binary interaction model, the following comments can be drawn. The isotactic MMA segments seemed to interact differently with styrene and with acrylonitrile segments from atactic or syndiotactic MMA segments. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 2894–2899, 1999     

Carbon black‐filled poly(ethylene‐co‐alkyl acrylate) composites: Calorimetric studies

The calorimetric characteristics of carbon black (CB)/poly(ethylene‐co‐alkyl acrylate) composites depend on both the CB and acrylate contents. An increase of the acrylate content in the pure copolymers tends to decrease all the crystalline characteristics: T_c,n, the nonisothermal crystallization temperature; T_m, the melting temperature, and ΔH_m, the melting enthalpy. CB modifies the crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate) (EEA) alone and in blends with poly(ethylene‐co‐24% w/w methyl acrylate) (24EMA) and poly(ethylene‐co‐35% w/w methyl acrylate) (35EMA). In the presence of CB, T_c,n, the nonisothermal crystallization temperature of EEA, increases and t_1/2, the half‐crystallization time, decreases for a given isothermal crystallization temperature, T_c,i. The thermograms obtained during the melting of EEA after isothermal crystallization show multiple endotherms, suggesting that crystalline‐phase segregation has occurred. The existence of different crystalline species can be explained by the presence of fractions of different acrylate content in the copolymers as shown by SEC. Therefore, CB does not seem to have much effect on the subsequent melting temperature of EEA, T_m,s. CB also induces a lower melting enthalpy, Δ H_m, in the blends. This decrease of ΔH_m appears to be constant whatever the compound, but when reported to the melting enthalpy of the polymer without CB, δΔH_m/ΔH_m increases with the acrylate content. A slight increase of the amorphous phase stiffness after CB introduction is noticed: The T_g of EEA/24EMA and EEA/35EMA blends increases by several degrees. Therefore, plotting ΔH_m versus ΔC_p shows that for the same ΔH_m the ΔC_p is lower in CB‐filled samples, suggesting there is some kind of rigid amorphous phase not contributing to the glass transition. We propose to explain the CB activity during the crystallization process by the existence of molecular interactions between CB and acrylate groups rather than by a pure nucleating effect. Thus, the increase of T_c,n and the decrease of ΔH_m could be explained by the fact that CB separates acrylate‐rich chains from the crystallization medium, accelerating the crystallization of the acrylate‐poor chains. During such a crystallization process, CB may be preferentially localized in the more polar amorphous phase and scattered between the two crystalline phases of EEA and EXA. These blends of poly(ethylene‐co‐alkyl acrylate) copolymers with CB provide interesting materials with adjustable properties depending on the acrylate and CB contents and on the thermomechanical treatments. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 779–793, 2001     

Effect of P(lLA‐co‐εCL) on the compatibility and crystallization behavior of PCL/PLLA blends

This article describes the compatibility of two semicrystalline polymers, poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(l‐lactic acid) (PLLA). The compatibility of the PCL/PLLA blends was enhanced by the compatibilizing effect of the poly(l,l‐lactide‐co‐ε‐caprolactone) [P(lLA‐co‐εCL)]. A discussion details the effect of the concentration of the compatibilizing agent, the copolymer of l,l‐lactide and ε‐caprolactone of a 50/50 mol ratio [P(lLA‐co‐εCL)], on the compatibility and the crystallization behavior of the blends of PCL and PLLA. It was found that the addition of P(lLA‐co‐εCL) could suppress the crystallization of PLLA at its T_c and induced the concurrent crystallization of PLLA and PCL. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 226–231, 2000     

Miscibility of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) with high molecular weight poly(lactic acid) blends determined by thermal analysis

An important strategy used in the polymer industry in recent years is blending two bio‐based polymers to attain desirable properties similar to traditional thermoplastics, thus increasing the application potential for bio‐based and bio‐degradable polymers. Miscibility of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) with poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLA) were characterized using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Three different grades of commercially available PLAs and one type of PHBV were blended in different ratios of 50/50, 60/40, 70/30, and 80/20 (PHBV/PLA) using a micro‐compounder at 175°C. The DSC and TGA analysis showed the blends were immiscible due to different stereo configuration of PLA polymer and two distinct melting temperatures. However, some compatibility between PHBV and PLA polymers was observed due to decreases in PLA's glass transition temperatures. Additionally, the blends do not show clear separation by SEM analysis, as observed in the thermal analysis. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Influence of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) on miscibility and properties of atactic poly(methyl methacrylate)

Miscibility and properties of two atactic poly(methyl methacrylate)‐based blends [containing 10 and 20% of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)] have been investigated as a function of thermal treatments. Differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis of blends quenched in liquid nitrogen or ice/water, after annealing at T > 190 °C, showed a single glass transition temperature, indicating miscibility of the components for the time‐temperature history. Two glass transition temperatures, equal to those of the pure components, are instead found for blends after annealing at T < 190 °C. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the homogeneity for the former quenched blends and phase separation for the latter. These results indicate the presence of an upper critical solution temperature (UCST). Tensile experiments, performed on two series of samples annealed at temperatures above and below the UCST, showed that the copolyester induces a decrease of Young's modulus and stresses at yielding and break points, and a marked increase of elongation at break. Differences in tensile properties between the two series of annealed blends are accounted for by the physical state of the components at room temperature after annealing above or below the UCST. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Blends of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)/natural rubber‐g‐(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) for improved impact resistance of PVC

To improve the mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), the possibility of combining PVC with elastomers was considered. Modification of natural rubber (NR) by graft copolymerization with methyl methacrylate (MMA) and styrene (St) was carried out by emulsion polymerization by using redox initiator to provide an impact modifier for PVC. The impact resistance, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of St and MMA grafted NR [NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA)]/PVC (graft copolymer product contents of 5, 10, and 15%) blends were investigated as a function of the amount of graft copolymer product. It was found that the impact strength of blends was increased with an increase of the graft copolymer product content. DMA studies showed that NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA) has partial compatibility with PVC. SEM confirmed a shift from brittle failure to ductility with an increase graft copolymer content in the blends. The mechanical properties showed that NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA) interacts well with PVC and can also be used as an impact modifier for PVC. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1666–1672, 2004