Clinical effects of childbirth with median episiotomy and anal sphincter injury on fecal incontinence of primiparous women

Obstetric damage of the anorectal continence organ can lead to impaired anal continence. To assess the effect of birth, either with or without direct injury of the anal sphincter, 123 primiparae were studied. 41 patients with a midline episiotomy and 82 patients with an additional injury of the anal sphincter were assessed at a median of 21 weeks postpartum and compared with 18 healthy volunteers. Anorectal manometry as well as a standardized questionnaire were employed. Patients with an additional injury of the anal sphincter reported persistent flatus incontinence significantly more often (p = 0.0069) than patients with a midline episiotomy only. Incontinence of solid or liquid stool occurred only transiently. Compared to nulliparae in all primiparae a significant shortening of anal canal and a decreased squeeze pressure were observed. In addition, a significantly reduced resting pressure was seen in patients with an anal sphincter injury. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex was absent significantly more often following anal sphincter tear (p = 0.0023). Vaginal delivery, both with and without anal sphincter injury, leads to early detectable changes in anorectal sphincter function.     

Diagnosing anal sphincter injury with transanal ultrasound and manometry

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate how well anorectal manometry and transanal ultrasonography diagnose anal sphincter injury. METHODS: Anorectal manometry and transanal ultrasonography were performed in 20 asymptomatic nulliparous women and 20 asymptomatic parous women, and the results were compared with those obtained in 31 incontinent women who subsequently underwent sphincteroplasty and, thus, had operatively verified anal sphincter injury. By using computerized manometry analysis, mean maximum resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter length, and vector symmetry were determined in all women. All transanal ultrasounds were interpreted blinded as to the patient's history, physical examination, and manometry results. RESULTS: Manometric resting and squeeze pressures were significantly higher in the asymptomatic nulliparous women than in the asymptomatic parous women, and both groups had significantly higher pressures than the incontinent women (P < 0.001). Anal sphincter length and vector symmetry index were significantly decreased in incontinent women compared with asymptomatic women (P < 0.01). Decreased resting and squeeze pressures suggestive of possible sphincter injury were found in 90 percent of incontinent women with known anal sphincter injury. Decreased anal sphincter length and vector symmetry were found in only 42 percent of women with known anal sphincter injury. Transanal ultrasound was able to identify 100 percent of the known sphincter injuries but also falsely diagnosed injury in 10 percent of the asymptomatic nulliparous women with intact anal sphincters. False identification of sphincter injury increased when transanal ultrasound scanning was performed proximal to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal. CONCLUSION: Although nonspecific, decreased resting and squeeze pressures were found in 90 percent of patients with anal sphincter injury. Decreased anal sphincter length or vector symmetry index were present in only 42 percent of patients with known sphincter injury. When limited to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal, transanal ultrasound identified all known sphincter injuries but falsely identified injury in 10 percent of women with intact anal sphincters. Transanal ultrasound in combination with decreased anal pressures correctly identified all intact sphincters and 90 percent of known anal sphincter injuries.     

Anorectal manometric examination in encopretic-constipated children

PURPOSE: We have investigated the use of anorectal manometry to distinguish encopretic-constipated children (n = 88) from sibling controls (n = 16) and nonsibling controls (n = 11). METHODS: Study variables included manometrically determined resting and maximum voluntary anal sphincter pressure, depth and speed of rectoanal inhibitory reflex, minimum rectal volume sensation, critical distending volume for fecal urgency, rectal and anal pressure responses during attempted defecation, and ability to defecate a water-filled balloon. RESULTS: Change in anal sphincter pressure during attempted defecation (P = 0.03), gradient between rectal and sphincter pressure during attempted defecation (P = 0.02), critical distending volume for fecal urgency (P = 0.02), and ability to defecate a water-filled balloon (P = 0.05) distinguished encopretic-constipated from control children. The change in rectal pressure associated with the rectoanal inhibitory reflex just escaped significance at P = 0.07. CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter spasm and megacolon are pathophysiologic abnormalities associated with pediatric constipation-encopresis.     

Serial evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection of the rectum

PURPOSE: This prospective study was performed to serially assess the changes in anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum, and to elucidate the mechanisms of functional impairment and the recovery process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer were evaluated prospectively. Standardized interviews concerning anorectal function and physiologic studies consisting of manometry and balloon proctometry were performed preoperatively, then at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year after the operation. Depending on the length of the residual rectum, patients were divided into two groups: (1) shorter than 4 cm (the short group, n = 18), and (2) longer than or equal to 4 cm (the long group, n = 14). RESULTS: Postoperatively, stool frequency increased and urgency to defecate occurred, which continued until 3-6 months had passed and was more remarkable in the short group. Overall incontinence score increased, which was more remarkable in the short group. Anal resting pressure showed a moderate reduction after 3 months, whereas squeeze pressure did not decrease significantly. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was postoperatively abolished in almost all patients in the short group, which showed nearly no recovery for 1 year. In the long group, it persisted postoperatively in half the cases, and the reflex returned in a few cases within 1 year. Balloon proctometry revealed overall reduction in rectal capacity and compliance. Although the values tended to recover steadily, they did not reach the preoperative level for 1 year. Urgent volume and maximal tolerable volume remarkably declined, which continued for 1 year and for 6 months, respectively. Rectal compliance also decreased considerably, which continued for 6 months. Most values of rectal capacity tended to be smaller in the short group. CONCLUSION: Impairment of continence after low anterior resection seemed multifactorial, including diminished rectal capacity and compliance, impaired internal anal sphincter tone, and loss of rectoanal inhibitory reflex. Clinical outcome was better and reduction in rectal capacity was less in patients whose rectum remained more than 4 cm. Most of the functional impairments clinically recovered by 6 months postoperation. In the process of clinical recovery of continence, restoration of rectal capacity and compliance and internal anal sphincter tone seemed to contribute a significant degree, while the rectoanal inhibitory reflex did not contribute as much.     

Dynamic anal manometry in the assessment of patients with obstructed defecation

Patients with obstructed defecation show no consistent abnormalities when assessed by standard anorectal physiologic methods. With a recently developed technique for dynamic anal manometry, we studied 13 female patients with obstructed defecation and 20 healthy volunteers. Seven parameters of anal function were measured. There were no differences between the median values for the two groups. Seven patients (54 percent; 95 percent confidence limits, 25-81 percent) had anal compliance below the normal range, either during opening or closing of the sphincter at rest (five patients), during squeeze (one patient), or both (one patient). Opening and closing pressures of the sphincter at rest, maximal closing pressure during squeeze, and anal hysteresis were normal. Standard anal manometry did not show any differences between patients and controls. Rectal compliance was lower in patients with obstructed defecation, median difference 5 ml/cm H2O (95 percent confidence limits, 1-9 ml/cm H2O). In conclusion, the more detailed method of dynamic anal manometry shows that some patients with obstructed defecation have a less compliant anal sphincter and a less compliant rectum, but in many patients no abnormal findings can be made.     

Colonic and anorectal function in constipated patients with anorexia nervosa

OBJECTIVES: Many patients with eating disorders complain of severe constipation. Previous studies have suggested that constipation in patients with anorexia nervosa may be associated with slow colonic transit. However, it is unclear whether a refeeding program will alter colonic transit in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate colorectal function by measuring colonic transit and anorectal function in anorexic patients with constipation during treatment with a refeeding program. METHODS: We prospectively studied 13 female patients with anorexia nervosa who were admitted to an inpatient treatment unit and compared them to 20 previously studied, age-matched, healthy female control subjects. Patients underwent colonic transit studies using a radiopaque marker technique and anorectal manometry measuring anal sphincter function, rectal sensation, expulsion dynamics, and rectal compliance. Patients were studied both early (< 3 wk) and late (> 3 wk) in their admission. We restudied two patients who had slow colonic transit. All patients also underwent structured interviews. RESULTS: Four of six patients studied within the first 3 wk of their admission had slow colonic transit, defined as > 70 h (108.0 +/- 17.0 h, mean +/- SEM), on initial evaluation. In contrast, none of the seven patients studied later than 3 wk into their admission had slow colonic transit. Two of the four patients with slow transit were restudied later in their admission and were found to have normal transit times. Rectal sensation, internal anal sphincter relaxation threshold, rectal compliance, sphincter pressures, and expulsion pattern were normal in all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite complaints of severe constipation, colonic transit is normal or returns to normal in the majority of patients with anorexia nervosa once they are consuming a balanced weight gain or weight maintenance diet for at least 3 wk.     

A retrospective study of the effects of pelvic irradiation for gynecological cancer on anorectal function

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of anorectal dysfunction following therapeutic pelvic irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Anorectal function was evaluated in 15 randomly selected patients (aged 47-84 years) who had received pelvic irradiation for treatment of carcinoma of the uterine body and cervix 5 and 10 years earlier. The following parameters were assessed in each patient: (a) anorectal symptoms (questionnaire), (b) anorectal pressures at rest and in response to rectal distension, voluntary squeeze, and increases in intraabdominal pressure (multiport anorectal manometry with concurrent electromyography of the anal sphincters), (c) rectal sensation (rectal balloon distension) and, (d) anal sphincteric morphology (ultrasound). Results were compared with those obtained in nine female control subjects. RESULTS: Ten of the 15 patients had urgency of defecation and 4 also suffered fecal incontinence. Basal anorectal pressures measured just proximal to the anal canal (p = 0.05) and anorectal pressures generated in response to voluntary squeeze measured at the anal canal were less (p < 0.01) in the patients. The fall in anal pressures in response to rectal distension was greater in the patients (p < 0.05) and the desire to defecate occurred at lower rectal volumes (p < 0.05). The slope of the pressure/volume relationship in response to rectal distension was greater (p < 0.05) in the patients, suggestive of a reduction in rectal compliance. In 14 of the 15 patients at least one parameter of anorectal motor function was outside the control range. There was no difference in the thickness of the anal sphincters between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Abnormal anorectal function occurs frequently following pelvic irradiation for gynecological malignant diseases and is characterized by multiple dysfunctions including weakness of the external anal sphincter, stiffness of the rectal wall, and a consequent increase in rectal sensitivity.     

Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the long-term clinical and anorectal functional results after primary repair of a third-degree obstetrical perineal rupture. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six consecutive women who had a primary repair of a third-degree perineal rupture were sent a questionnaire and asked to undergo anorectal function testing (anal manometry, anorectal sensitivity, anal endosonography and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML)) RESULTS: Some 117 women (75 per cent) responded. Anal incontinence was present in 47 women (40 per cent); however, in most cases only mild symptoms were present. In 40 women additional anorectal function tests were performed and compared with findings in normal controls. Mean(s.d.) maximum squeeze pressure (31(15) versus 63(17) mmHg, P< 0.001) was decreased and first sensation to filling of the rectum (88(47) versus 66(33) ml, P=0.03) and anal mucosal electrosensitivity (4.7(1.7) versus 2.5(0.8) mA, P=0.003) were increased compared with values in normal controls. In 35 women (88 per cent) a sphincter defect was found with anal endosonography. Factors related to anal incontinence were the presence of a combined anal sphincter defect (relative risk (RR) 1.7 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.1-2.8)) or subsequent vaginal delivery (RR 1.6 (95 per cent c.i. 1.1-2.5)). CONCLUSION: Anal incontinence prevails in 40 per cent of women 5 years after primary repair of a third-degree perineal rupture. The presence of a combined sphincter defect or subsequent vaginal delivery increase the risk of anal incontinence.     

Combining the strength-duration curve of the external anal sphincter with manometry for the assessment of faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND: The strength-duration curve of a muscle is thought to be a measure of its innervation. This study was designed to evaluate the ability of the strength-duration curve of the external anal sphincter to discriminate between controls and patients with faecal incontinence. METHODS: Forty-three women with faecal incontinence due to sphincter weakness were studied together with 45 age-matched women with no disorders of defaecation. Strength-duration curves of the external anal sphincter and anorectal manometry were recorded for all subjects with the additional measurement of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in the incontinent group. RESULTS: Logistic regression was performed using resting and voluntary squeeze pressures and current strengths at 28 different pulse durations to develop a predictive equation for incontinence. Only currents at 1 and 6 ms were significant predictors. When anorectal manometry data were included, only the current required to elicit contraction at 1 ms was necessary. The following regression equation can be applied to predict continence in this population with a sensitivity of 95 per cent and a specificity of 100 per cent: logit(P)=4.1605-(0.0559 x squeeze pressure)-(0.1755 x resting pressure)+0.8622I(1 ms). A negative value indicates continence. CONCLUSION: The strength-duration curve, when used in conjunction with anorectal manometry, may have a role in the investigation of faecal incontinence.     

Effects of nicotine, pilocarpine, and tetrahydroaminoacridine on hippocampal theta waves in freely moving rabbits

Fifty-eight patients with anorectal malformations were closely followed up for postoperative anorectal function. Constipation was noted shortly after anorectoplasty in 10 of 28 low anomalies (35.7%) treated with limited sagittal anorectoplasty (LSARP), in 18 of 25 high or intermediate anomalies (72.0%) treated with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), but in none of 5 high or intermediate anomalies treated with Rehbein's mucosa-stripping endorectal pull-through and anterior sagittal perineal anorectoplasty (R-ASAP). The constipation resolved mostly within 1-2 years after repair under conservative management, but persisted beyond 2 years after repair in 3/25 children with LSARP and 10/25 with PSARP. Anal soiling was noted in 1/23 (4.3%) LSARP and 6/22 (27.3%) PSARP patients, but normal anorectal function was attained in 20/23 LSARP (86.9%) and 11/12 PSARP patients (50.0%) by the time of toilet training. Manometric studies disclosed that the resting rectal pressure (RRP) was lower and the anorectal pressure gradient (ARPG) higher in the constipated than the non-constipated children, while the RRP was higher and the ARPG lower in the soiled than the non-soiled patients. The ARPG after R-ASPA was close to that of non-constipated and in between that of the constipated and soiled patients. The rectoanal sphincter inhibitory reflex was not related to defecation status or surgical procedures, but showed a tendency toward positive conversion with time or after exclusion of esctatic terminal bowel in the severely constipated. It is concluded that anorectal function in patients with repaired imperforate anus seems to be more affected by the extent of endopelvic dissection than by preservation of the terminal bowel or sphincter muscles.     

Prevalence and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis in healthy postmenopausal women

Fecal incontinence is an under-reported complication of scleroderma. Ten incontinent patients with scleroderma were evaluated through anorectal manometry and compared with 20 incontinent patients without scleroderma who were matched for age and sex as controls. The scleroderma patients had a higher voluntary external anal squeeze pressure, whereas the resting internal anal sphincter pressure was similar to that of the control group. The threshold for rectal sensation in the scleroderma group was significantly less than that in controls. Episodes of fecal incontinence, anal canal length, and maximal tolerable volume were not significantly different between the study groups. The rectoanal inhibitory response was abnormal in 80% of patients with systemic sclerosis but was normal in 70% of the controls. Stool consistency was significantly looser in the scleroderma patients. Treatment of fecal incontinence in scleroderma patients may be successful in many patients using a combination of dietary and pharmacologic manipulation because diarrhea is an important etiologic cofactor superimposed on reduced internal anal sphincter pressure.     

Influence of age and prostate-specific antigen on the chance of curable prostate cancer among men with nonpalpable disease

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to retrospectively analyze the Mayo Clinic experience of descending perineum syndrome from 1987-1997. METHODS: Clinical records were abstracted for demographic features, risk factors, results of anorectal and defecation tests, and a mailed questionnaire evaluated outcome and current symptoms. RESULTS: All results are mean +/- SD. Clinically, 39 patients (38 women, one man), mean age 53+/-14 yr, presented with constipation (97%), incomplete rectal evacuation (92%), excessive straining (97%), digital rectal evacuation (38%), and fecal incontinence (15%). Laboratory tests showed anal sphincter resting pressure was 54+/-26 mm Hg, and squeeze pressure was 96+/-35 mm Hg; expulsion from the rectum of a 50-ml balloon required > 200 g added weight in 27%; perineal descent was 4.4+/-1 cm (normal < 4 cm) by scintigraphy. Scintigraphic evacuation, rectoanal angle change during defecation, and perineal descent were abnormal in 23%, 57%, and 78% of the patients, respectively. Associated features included female gender (96%), multiparity with vaginal delivery (55%), hysterectomy or cystocele/rectocele repair (74%). On follow-up, 64% responded; 17 of these 25 responders underwent pelvic floor retraining. At 2-yr median follow-up (range, 1-6 yr), 12 still experienced constipation or excessive straining; their perineal descent was greater than in patients who responded to retraining (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Descending perineum syndrome is identifiable by clinical history and examination, and the most prevalent abnormality on testing is perineal descent > 4 cm; rectal balloon expulsion is an insensitive screening test for descending perineum syndrome. Pelvic floor retraining is a suboptimal treatment for this chronic disorder of rectal evacuation; the extent of perineal descent appears to be a useful predictor of response to retraining.     

Biofeedback training is useful in fecal incontinence but disappointing in constipation

BACKGROUND: Successful biofeedback therapy has been reported in the treatment of fecal incontinence and constipation. It is uncertain which groups of incontinent patients benefit from biofeedback, and our impression has been that biofeedback is more successful for incontinence than for constipation. PURPOSE: This study was designed to review the results of biofeedback therapy at the Lahey Clinic. METHODS: Biofeedback was performed using an eight-channel, water-perfused manometry system. Patients saw anal canal pressures as a color bar graph on a computer screen. Assessment after biofeedback was by manometry and by telephone interview with an independent researcher. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (13 women and 2 men) with incontinence underwent a mean of three (range, 1-7) biofeedback sessions. The cause was obstetric (four patients), postsurgical (five patients), and idiopathic (six patients). Complete resolution of symptoms was reported in four patients, considerable improvement in four patients, and some improvement in three patients. Manometry showed a mean increase of 15.3 (range, -3-30) mmHg in resting pressure and 35.7 (range, 13-57) mmHg in squeezing pressure after biofeedback. A successful outcome could not be predicted on the basis of cause, severity of incontinence, or initial manometry. Twelve patients (10 women and 2 men) with constipation underwent a mean of three (range, 1-14) biofeedback sessions. Each had manometric evidence of paradoxic nonrelaxing external sphincter or puborectalis muscle confirmed by defography or electromyography. All patients could be taught to relax their sphincter in response to bearing down. Despite this, only one patient reported resolution of symptoms, three patients had reduced straining, and three patients had some gain in insight. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback helped 73 percent of patients with fecal incontinence, and its use should be considered regardless of the cause or severity of incontinence or of results on initial manometry. In contrast, biofeedback directed at correcting paradoxic external sphincter contraction has been disappointing.     

Computer-generated profiles of the anal canal in patients with anal fissure

PURPOSE: The pathophysiology of anal fissure remains poorly understood. This study examines manometric findings in patients with anal fissure with use of a computer-assisted system, which helps to standardize manometric performance as well as generating longitudinal and cross-sectional profiles of the anal canal. METHODS: Water-perfused, eight-channel, computer-assisted manometry was performed on 12 patients with chronic anal fissure and compared with 12 age-matched and sex-matched controls. RESULTS: Mean maximum average resting pressure (MARP) was 120.5 mmHg in patients and 82.6 mmHg in controls (P = 0.0005). Pain was felt during manometry in six patients. In these patients, MARP was 123.2 mmHg, and, in the other six patients, MARP was 117.8 mmHg. Sphincter length was 4.72 cm, and the high pressure zone or that part of the sphincter with pressure more than 50 percent of MARP) was 2.78 cm in length. The high pressure zone/sphincter length ratio was 58 percent compared with 48 percent in controls. Longitudinal profile was bell shaped. Elevated pressures were not confined to the site of the fissure. Cross-sectional analysis showed higher anterior pressures in the distal sphincter. Ultraslow waves were seen in as many as 91 percent of patients and 73 percent of controls. However, ultraslow wave amplitude was 31 mmHg in patients and 15 mmHg in controls (P = 0.03). The rectoanal reflex was normal; overshoot was not seen. CONCLUSIONS: The primary abnormality in fissure is persistent hypertonia affecting the entire internal sphincter, unrelated to pain. Cross-sectional pressure profiles may explain the predilection of fissures to occur in the posterior midline; other factors must prevent chronic fissures from healing.     

A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients

PURPOSE: Constipation is a common complaint; however, clinical presentation varies with each individual. The aim of this study was to assess a standard scoring system for evaluation of constipated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with idiopathic constipation who were referred for anorectal physiologic testing were assessed. A subjective constipation score was calculated based on a detailed questionnaire that included over 100 constipation-related symptoms. Based on the questionnaire, scores ranged from 0 to 30, with 0 indicating normal and 30 indicating severe constipation. The constipation score was then compared with the objective findings of the physiology tests, which include colonic transit time (CTT), anal manometry (AM), cinedefecography (CD), and electromyography (EMG). Colonic inertia was defined as diffuse marker delay on CTT without evidence of paradoxical contraction on AM, CD, or EMG. Pelvic outlet obstruction was defined as paradoxical puborectalis contraction, rectal prolapse or rectoanal intussusception, rectocele, or sigmoidocele. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients (185 females and 47 males) of a mean age of 64.9 (range, 14-92) years were evaluated. All patients had a score of more than 15; on evaluation of the significance of different symptoms in the constipation score with the Pearson's linear correlation test, 8 of 18 factors were identified as significant (P < 0.05). These factors included frequency of bowel movements, painful evacuation, incomplete evacuation, abdominal pain, length of time per attempt, assistance for evacuation, unsuccessful attempts for evacuation per 24 hours, and duration of constipation. All 232 patients had objective obstruction attributable to one or more of the following causes: paradoxical puborectalis contraction (81), significant rectocele or sigmoidocele (48), rectoanal intussusception (64), and rectal prolapse (9). CONCLUSION: The proposed constipation scoring system correlated well with objective physiologic findings in constipated patients to allow uniformity in assessment of the severity of constipation.     

Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination

OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of obstructive defecation is unclear. We investigated whether impaired rectoanal coordination causes obstructive defecation and if this dysfunction can be corrected by biofeedback therapy. METHODS: We prospectively studied 25 healthy subjects and 35 consecutive patients with constipation (>1 year) with anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion test. Symptoms were assessed from diary cards. Patients found to have obstructive defecation were offered biofeedback therapy. After treatment, their defecation dynamics and symptoms were reassessed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had obstructive defecation and 17 had normal defecation dynamics (nonobstructive). Five normals (20%) exhibited obstructive pattern but only one failed to expel balloon. In the obstructive group, during straining, the intrarectal pressure and defecation index were lower (p < 0.05), and anal residual pressure was higher (p < 0.01) when compared with the nonobstructive group or normals. After biofeedback therapy, the intrarectal pressure and defecation index increased (p < 0.02) and anal residual pressure decreased (p < 0.001); stool frequency, degree of straining, and bowel satisfaction scores improved (p < 0.05); 67% stopped laxatives and 11 patients discontinued stooling with digitation. CONCLUSION: Patients with obstructive defecation showed impaired rectal contraction, paradoxical anal contraction, or inadequate anal relaxation. These features suggest that rectoanal coordination was impaired. Biofeedback therapy rectified these pathophysiological disturbances and improved constipation.     

Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent individuals

AIMS: A study is made of the alterations in anorectal physiology among rectal prolapse patients, evaluating the differences between fecal continent and incontinent individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with complete rectal prolapse were divided into two groups: Group A (8 continent individuals) and Group B (10 incontinent women), while 22 healthy women were used as controls (Group C). Clinical exploration and perineal level measurements were performed, along with anorectal manometry, electrophysiology, and anorectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli. RESULTS: The main antecedents of the continent subjects were excess straining efforts, while the incontinent women presented excess straining and complex deliveries. Pathological perineal descent was a frequent finding in both groups, with a hypotonic anal canal at rest (p < 0.001 vs controls) and at voluntary squeezing (p < 0.001 vs controls). In turn, the incontinent patients exhibited a significantly lower anal canal pressure at rest than the continent women (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between Groups A and C in terms of pudendal motor latency, though latency was significantly longer in Group B than in the controls (p < 0.01). Moreover, pudendal neuropathy was more common, severe and often bilateral in Group B. There were no differences in rectal sensation to distention or in terms of the volumes required to relax the internal anal sphincter. In turn, both prolapse groups exhibited diminished anal canal and rectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rectal prolapse exhibit a hypotonic anal canal at rest, regardless of whether they are continent to feces or not. Continent patients have less pudendal neuropathy and therefore less pressure alterations at voluntary sphincter squeeze than incontinent individuals.     

Manometric evaluation of constipation--Part I

Tests of anorectal function have evolved into clinically useful investigations, and they should no longer be regarded as esoteric tools. This transformation has led to major advances in understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of defecation disorders, such as constipation. Because constipation is a heterogeneous condition, it cannot be assessed by a single test. Judicious use of anorectal manometry, colon transit study, a test of simulated defecation, and defecography may provide invaluable pathophysiological information. Undoubtedly, examination of rectal and anal pressure activity, rectal sensation, rectoanal reflexes, and the functional morphology of the defecation unit provides more information than any other test of gastrointestinal motor function; however, there is no uniform criteria for defining manometric abnormalities. There is also an urgent need for establishing international standards for manometric techniques and for diagnosis. Nevertheless, knowledge and experience have paved the way for innovative diagnostic techniques and therapeutic approaches for patients with constipation.     

Combined percutaneous-endoscopic therapy for recurrent pancreatitis and pancreas divisum

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal motility is often impaired in patients with megaduodenum and other forms of intestinal pseudo-obstruction in which a visceral myopathy or neuropathy may be present. Idiopathic longstanding megacolon with onset in adult life is still a poorly defined entity, which may also be part of a more widespread motility disorder but in which oesophageal motility has not been yet systematically studied. AIMS: To assess oesophageal motility in patients with longstanding idiopathic megacolon with onset in adult life. PATIENTS: 14 consecutive subjects with idiopathic megacolon whose symptoms began after the age of 10 and a clinical history of 2-22 years. METHODS: Standard barium enema, water perfused oesophageal manometry, and also anorectal manometry. RESULTS: Oesophageal motility was impaired in five patients (36%; 95% confidence intervals 16 to 61%). Normal peristalsis was substituted by low amplitude multiple peaked simultaneous contractions in four subjects and by undetectable contractions in one. In three of them the lower oesophageal sphincter did not relax after swallows; in the same patients anal relaxation after rectal distension was also undetectable. All five patients with impaired oesophageal motility had a colonic dilatation sparing the rectum. Three of them reported constipation and a history of pesudo-obstruction and the other two only abdominal distension. CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal manometry should be performed in patients with longstanding idiopathic megacolon with onset in adult life, in particular if the rectum is not dilated and even in absence of pseudo-obstruction. This simple test may disclose a more widespread visceral neuropathy or myopathy. Such a diagnosis helps to better understand the cause of the colonic dilatation and may be clinically relevant for treatment of the patients.     

The PAI-1/vitronectin interaction: two cats in a bag?

Cisapride (CIS) is a prokinetic agent that increases gastrointestinal motility in normal individuals and improves constipation in Parkinson's disease (PD). We studied the effects of CIS on the clinical response and the peripheral pharmacokinetics of orally administered L-dopa given to patients with PD. Twenty patients with idiopathic PD and chronic constipation, whose response to L-dopa was suboptimal or characterized by fluctuations, agreed to participate in an open study that lasted for 2 weeks. Fourteen patients completed the study (mean age 65 +/- 9.3 years, mean duration of treatment 5.7 +/- 4.2 years, mean L-dopa daily doses 658.9 +/- 269.9 mg); six patients were excluded due to lack of compliance or changes in medication during the study. The end points of the study included the mean levels of L-dopa, the height of the peak of L-dopa in plasma, mean plasma levels of 3-OM-dopa, and the speed and quality of gait and visuomanual coordination before and during treatment with CIS. CIS increased peak plasma levels of L-dopa by 37% and the mean plasma levels of L-dopa by 13% with respect to those obtained with the same dose of L-dopa before the addition of CIS. Therefore, CIS appears to increase early absorption of L-dopa through acceleration of gastric emptying. CIS also increased plasma 3-OM-dopa levels, improved visuomanual coordination, and reduced gait disability. CIS improves gastrointestinal function and response to L-dopa in patients with PD and could be a helpful add-on medication in these patients.