Post-OKT3 induction therapy CD complex response predicts renal allograft rejection

CD complex response to cessation of induction with OKT3 may be predictive of rejection. Twenty-seven patients receiving renal allografts and OKT3 induction immunosuppression were retrospectively analyzed for CD complex repopulation and allograft rejection. Flow cytometric monitoring was utilized in all patients. Responder status groups were identified based on CD complex repopulation, with fast responders demonstrating CD complex repopulation above the determined cohort mean. Slow responders had repopulation below this mean. Student's t test yielded P<0.01 (CD2), P<0.02 (CD3), and P<0.01 (CD8). Nonresponder patients were identified with repopulation below the mean, but flat compared with depletion. All nine fast responders lost their graft or were treated for rejection. No slow responder experienced graft loss or rejection episodes. One nonresponder was treated for rejection. CD complex activity following OKT3 cessation correlates with future rejection. Identification of responder status provides insight into propensity to reject, allowing individual tailoring of immunosuppression to patient response.     

Delayed function reduces renal allograft survival independent of acute rejection

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms by which delayed allograft function reduces renal allograft survival are poorly understood. This study evaluated the relationship of delayed allograft function to acute rejection and long-term survival of cadaveric allografts. METHODS: 338 recipients of cadaveric allografts were followed until death, resumption of dialysis, retransplantation, loss to follow-up, or the study's end, which ever came first. Delayed allograft function was defined by dialysis during the first week following transplantation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards survival analysis was used to assess the relationship of delayed allograft function to rejection and allograft survival. RESULTS: Delayed allograft function, recipient age, preformed reactive antibody levels, prior kidney transplantation, recipient race, rejection during the first 30 days and rejection subsequent to 30 days following transplantation were predictive of allograft survival in multivariate survival models. Delayed allograft function was associated with shorter allograft survival after adjustment for acute rejection and other covariates (relative rate of failure [RR]+1.72 [95% CI, 1.07, 2.76]). The adjusted RR of allograft failure associated with any rejection during the first 30 days was 1.99 (1.23, 3.21), and for rejection subsequent to the first 30 days was 3.53 (2.9 08, 6.00). The impact of delayed allograft function did not change substantially (RR=1.84 [1.15, 2.95]) in models not controlling for acute rejection. These results were stable among several subgroups of patients and using alternative definitions of allograft survival and delayed allograft function. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that delayed allograft function and acute allograft rejection have important independent and deleterious effects on cadaveric allograft survival. These results suggest that the effect of delayed allograft function is mediated, in part, through mechanisms not involving acute clinical rejection.     

Treatment of renal allograft rejection with T10B9.1A31 or OKT3: final analysis of a phase II clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute renal allograft rejection with the monoclonal antibody (mAb) OKT3 has been shown to be superior to treatment with polyclonal antisera. To date, only OKT3 has demonstrated consistent efficacy in reversing rejection crisis. METHODS: From 1989 to 1993, a phase II trial comparing the mAb T10B9.1A31 (T10B9) with OKT3 for treatment of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients was done at the University of Kentucky. We collected data from 178 patients potentially eligible to enter the study; 48 never rejected, 9 refused, 13 could not be biopsied, 16 received methylprednisolone, and 11 received antithymocyte globulin or OKT3. Altogether, 81 patients entered the study, 76 of whom were able to be evaluated. Patients with biopsy-confirmed acute rejection were randomly assigned to T10B9 or OKT3 for at least 10 days. RESULTS: Demographically, there was no difference between the T10B9 or OKT3 cohorts. Actuarial graft survival at 4 years was 87% for patients receiving T10B9, 79% for those receiving OKT3, and 89% for those receiving both mAbs (P=0.55). Patient survival at 4 years was 94% for T10B9, 100% for OKT3, and 89% for both mAbs (P=0.45). Mean creatinines of the cohorts were no different at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. There was less cytokine nephropathy (P<0.001) observed in patients receiving T10B9. Untoward gastrointestinal, neurological, respiratory, and febrile effects were significantly more frequent in the OKT3 cohort after the first dose (day 0) and with later (day 1-9) administration. Cytokine levels (tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon gamma) measured 2 hr after the first dose were three to six times higher in patients treated with OKT3 than in those treated with T10B9 (P<0.005). Infectious complications were not significantly different, although serious infections occurred only in patients receiving OKT3. No cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder were seen in either cohort. Human anti-mouse antibody development was as follows: titer 1:100, 30% T10B9, 42% OKT3; titer 1:1000, 3% T10B9, 3% OKT3. There was no cross-reactivity with OKT3 in patients treated with T10B9, and there was only 9.7% cross-reactivity to T10B9 in patients treated with OKT3. CONCLUSIONS: T10B9 provides treatment for renal allograft acute cellular rejection as effective as that of OKT3 with fewer untoward effects, less cytokine release and nephropathy, fewer serious infections, and without increased development of human anti-mouse antibody. The lack of cross-reactivity offers an alternative therapy should the first mAb fail or re-rejection occur. A phase III trial should be initiated in renal allograft recipients, and phase I and phase II trials should be initiated in other solid-organ transplantations.     

Cytomegalovirus preemptive therapy with ganciclovir in renal transplant patients treated with OKT3

In an attempt to decrease the prevalence and severity of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, preemptive therapy with ganciclovir was administered to all renal transplant patients treated with OKT3 between February 1993 and December 1994 (26 patients). The results were compared with those of a historical group treated with OKT3 but not with ganciclovir (29 patients). Both groups were similar in age, sex, number of previous transplants, number of rejections, serological status of donor and recipient and OKT3 dose. Ganciclovir was administered during the period of treatment with OKT3. Only 2 (7.7%) treated patients developed CMV disease versus 11 (37.9%) of the control group (p = 0.01). In the control group the intensity of the disease was severe in 7 (63.6%) cases, whereas in the treated patients it was always of slight intensity (p = 0.01). In conclusion, preemptive therapy with ganciclovir during treatment with OKT3 decreases the prevalence and severity of CMV disease.     

Prophylaxis of acute renal allograft rejection using FTY720 in combination with subtherapeutic doses of cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: In rodent transplant models, FTY720 exerts a synergistic affect with cyclosporine (CsA) to prolong allograft survival. The present experiments sought to test this combination in subhuman primates. METHODS: Cynomolgus monkeys were transplanted with kidney allografts that were incompatible in mixed lymphocyte culture reactions. The animals were treated with daily intramuscular injections of CsA using doses selected to maintain whole blood trough concentrations at therapeutic values between 40 and 200 ng/ml. The 4 experimental groups included CsA without or with 0.1, 0.3, or 1 mg/kg/day FTY720 delivered daily by intravenous bolus injection. Therapeutic effects were suggested both by the graft histology of biopsy within the first 10 posttransplant days and by the length of host survival. RESULTS: Whereas recipients treated with CsA alone rejected kidney allografts at a median survival time of 8.5 days (n=4), those treated with either 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg/day FTY720 in addition to CsA showed significant prolongation of kidney allograft survival to 71 days (n=3; P<0.04) or 63 days (n=5; P<0.05), respectively. The hosts in the 1.0 mg/kg/day FTY720 group survived 48 days, with 2 of 5 recipients succumbing at 9 or 17 days postgraft, suggesting possible complications caused by overimmunosuppression. Biopsies of the 0.1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group on posttransplant day 7 documented mild to moderate rejection (grade I), indicated by multiple focal areas of tubular destruction. The histology results of transplants in the 0.3 or 1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group showed only minimal interstitial inflammatory infiltrates (borderline grade), with no evidence of tubular or arterial damage. Serum creatinine values among the animals in the 0.1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group showed increases in 2 of 3 recipients by day 20 and in the third by day 41 postgraft. Among the 0.3 mg/kg/day FTY720 group, 3 of 5 recipients maintained baseline creatinine values to 45 days postgraft; 1 recipient had stable kidney function for 120 days postgraft. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of FTY720 therapy to a subtherapeutic CsA immunosuppressive regimen delays the rejection of renal allografts in subhuman primates.     

Localization of inducible nitric oxide synthase in acute renal allograft rejection in the rat

There is increasing evidence for a role for nitric oxide (NO) in the alloimmune response and induction of NO synthesis occurs during allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate the source of NO synthesis in rejecting allografts. Localization of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was studied by immunohistochemistry, in a rat model of acute renal allograft rejection, in unmodified Lewis recipients in which rejection is complete 7 days after transplantation of F1 hybrid Lewis-Brown Norway kidneys. High levels of iNOS expression were found in infiltrating mononuclear cells in glomeruli and interstitium of rejecting kidneys; there was no expression in parenchymal renal cells, or in control isografts of either rat strain. Expression of iNOS in the cortex was present from 4 to 6 days posttransplantation, and had declined by the 7th day, where expression was principally in the medulla. The pattern of iNOS staining was similar to ED1 staining, a marker for rat macrophages. These findings suggest that infiltrating macrophages in the graft reaction are a prominent source of NO; this iNOS expression supports a role for NO in the modulation of local allogeneic responses, and possibly as a mediator of cytotoxic graft damage.     

Results of transplantation for acute and chronic hepatic allograft rejection

B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by an accumulation of long-lived, resting B cells expressing the Bcl-2 protein. However, less than 10% of the CLL patients shows bcl-2 gene rearrangement in blood cells, using traditional Southern blotting analysis. In the present study, rearrangement of the bcl-2 gene in CLL cells was studied by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). With this method, large DNA fragments (> 50-10,000 kb) could be analyzed. Blood CLL cells from 9 of 9 patients and 2 of 2 CLL cell lines showed rearranged bcl-2 gene. In comparison, healthy blood B cells and lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) established from normal peripheral blood lymphocytes of the patients showed only germ line configuration. Thus, the possibility of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in this gene could be excluded. The primary cell involved in CLL might be a progenitor B cell that has accidentally rearranged the bcl-2 gene. As a consequence, such cells express stable amount of Bcl-2 protein and do not enter apoptosis. During prolonged survival, such cells may acquire secondary changes including chromosomal translocations and mutations.     

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression in human renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) plays a pivotal role in immune-mediated diseases. Despite the long-standing association of MIF with the delayed-type hypersensitivity response, the potential role of MIF in allograft rejection is unknown. METHODS: MIF expression was assessed by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry staining in 62 biopsies of human renal allograft rejection and in normal human kidney. RESULTS: MIF mRNA and protein is constitutively expressed in normal kidney, being largely restricted to tubular epithelial cells, some glomerular epithelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells. In both acute and chronic renal allograft rejection, there was marked up-regulation of MIF mRNA and protein expression by intrinsic kidney cells such as tubular epithelial cells and vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. There was also MIF expression by infiltrating macrophages and T cells. Of note, macrophage and T cell infiltrates were largely restricted to areas with marked up-regulation of MIF expression, potentially contributing to the development of severe tubulitis and intimal or transmural arteritis. Quantitative analysis found that increased MIF expression in allograft rejection gave a highly significant correlation with macrophage and T cell accumulation in both the glomerulus and interstitium (P<0.001). In addition, the number of MIF+ tubules and interstitial MIF+ cells correlated significantly with the severity of allograft rejection (P<0.01), and the loss of renal function (P<0.01). In contrast, no up-regulation of renal MIF expression and no leukocyte accumulation was seen in allograft biopsies without evidence of rejection. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that local MIF expression is up-regulated during allograft rejection. The association between up-regulation of MIF expression, macrophage and T cell infiltration and the severity of renal allograft rejection suggests that MIF may be an important mediator in the process of allograft rejection.