Production of isomalto‐oligosaccharide syrup from rice starch using an one‐step conversion method

Isomalto‐oligosaccharides (IMO) belong to a group of prebiotics that can significantly increase the number of protective gut microflora. A one‐step method using neopullulanase (NPN) in conjunction with saccharifying α‐amylase (SAA) for the bioconversion of rice starch into IMO was investigated. Purified rice starch slurry (30% w/w) was mixed with NPN (3.5 U g^?1 starch substrate) and SAA (6.5 U g^?1 starch substrate) and the slurry was incubated at 57 °C for 92 h under constant stirring. The carbohydrate composition of the resulting syrup was analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the dextrose equivalent (DE) determined by titration. The amount of IMO in the syrup reached maximum (59.2%, dry basis) after 72 h of bioconversion. The concentration of glucose and maltose, which were the main carbohydrate residues of the IMO syrup, was 25.5% while the concentration of other oligosaccharide residues was about 1.0%. The results demonstrate that rice starch is a suitable matrix for producing IMO syrup and the one‐step conversion procedure appears to be an efficient method for converting starch into IMO syrup.     

Batter rheology and bread texture of sorghum‐based gluten‐free formulations modified with native or pregelatinised cassava starch and α‐amylase

The influence of α‐amylase (0–0.3 U g^?1) on the crumb properties of gluten‐free sorghum batter and bread, respectively, was investigated. The formulations were modified using native or pregelatinised cassava starch (i.e. batter A – 17% pregelatinised starch, 83% sorghum, 100% water fwb; batter B – 17% native starch, 83% sorghum, 100% water fwb; and batter C – 30% native starch, 70% sorghum, 80% water fwb). The batters had solid viscoelastic character with the storage modulus predominant over the loss modulus. Storage moduli of batter A decreased with increasing angular frequency, whereas the moduli of batters B and C were independent from the angular frequency. Increasing enzyme concentration did not affect the loss factors of the batters. Batters’ resistance to deformation, from highest to lowest, followed the order C > A > B. Increasing enzyme concentration decreased crumb firmness, cohesiveness, springiness, resilience and chewiness but increased adhesiveness. Overall, breads containing native starch had better crumb properties (i.e. springier and less firm, chewy and adhesive) than breads containing pregelatinised starch.     

Synthesis and in vitro digestion of resistant starch type III from enzymatically hydrolysed cassava starch

Resistant starch type III (RS III) was synthesised from cassava starch by autoclaving followed by debranching with pullulanase, at varied concentrations (0.4–12 U g^?1) and times (2–8 h), and recrystallisation (?18 to 90 °C for 1–16 h). The highest RS III yield (22 g/100 g) was obtained at an enzyme concentration of 4 U g^?1 after 8 h incubation, followed by recrystallisation at 25 °C for 16 h. Varying the recrystallisation conditions indicated that higher RS III yields (30–35 g/100 g) could be obtained at 90 °C within 2 h. Thinning cassava starch using α‐amylase prior to debranching using pullulanase did not further increase the RS III content. In vitro digestion data showed that whereas 44% RS III was digested after 6 h, the corresponding value for cassava starch was 89%.     

Effect of cross-linking on the resistance to enzymatic hydrolysis of waxy maize starch and low-methoxy pectin

Gelatinised waxy maize starch and low-methoxy pectin mixtures were solubilised/dispersed in water and cross-linked with sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP). The polysaccharides were subjected to α-amylase, β-amylase or amyloglucosidase (AMG) hydrolysis for different times, and at two starch to pectin combination ratios (3:2 and 2:3). The extent of hydrolysis by porcine pancreatic α-amylase of the cross-linked (gelatinised) starch was 54.8–58.9% in comparison with gelatinised starch (for different incubation times), corresponding to 52.3–58.9% and 51.3–55.3% of the starch in the uncross-linked (UL) 3:2 and 2:3 starch to pectin ratios (for the same hydrolysis times). Blends of individually cross-linked starch to pectin ratios (3:2 and 2:3) were hydrolysed to 66.2–67.0% and 65.4–71.8%, respectively, compared with the corresponding UL counterparts. When the gelatinised starch was incubated for 0.5–36 h with β-amylase, hydrolysis ranged from 9.2% to 26.2%, and from 5.4% to 12.2% when the starch was cross-linked (corresponding to 40.0–58.7% of the gelatinised starch). For starch to pectin ratios of 3:2 or 2:3 blended after cross-linking, or by simultaneous cross-linking, hydrolysis represented 2.3–3.4% and 0.3–0.6% for the 3:2 ratio but only 1.2–2.0% and 0–0.3% for the 2:3 ratio. Hydrolysis with AMG using a 0.1 mg ml⁻¹ enzyme concentration caused 51.8% hydrolysis of gelatinised starch, which was lowered to 35.2% (i.e. by 68%) after cross-linking. At a higher enzyme concentration (1 mg ml⁻¹), the comparable figures were 91.7% and 71.9% (a reduction of 78.4%). For the UL 3:2 starch to pectin ratio and 0.1 and 1 mg ml⁻¹ enzyme concentrations, there was 27.8% and 56.5% hydrolysis of the polysaccharide which translated to 24.3% (87.4%) and 45.8% (81.1%), respectively, after cross-linking. Comparable figures for the 2:3 ratio (for the 0.1 and 1 mg ml⁻¹ enzyme concentrations) were 20.2% and 36.5% hydrolysis of the UL samples and 18.2% (90.1%) and 32.5% (89.0%) hydrolysis, respectively, after cross-linking.