Effect of LiBH4 on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

The effect of lithium borohydride (LiBH₄) on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of magnesium hydride (MgH₂) was investigated. It was found that LiBH₄ played both positive and negative effects on the hydrogen sorption of MgH₂. With 10 mol.% LiBH₄ content, MgH₂–10 mol.% LiBH₄ had superior hydrogen absorption/desorption properties, which could absorb 6.8 wt.% H within 1300 s at 200 °C under 3 MPa H₂ and completed desorption within 740 s at 350 °C. However, with the increasing amount of LiBH₄, the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation kinetics deteriorated, and the starting desorption temperature increased and the hysteresis of the pressure-composition isotherm (PCI) became larger. Our results showed that the positive effect of LiBH₄ was mainly attributed to the more uniform powder mixture with smaller particle size, while the negative effect of LiBH₄ might be caused by the H–H exchange between LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Enhanced dehydrogenation properties of LiBH4 compositing with hydrogenated magnesium-rare earth compounds

LiBH₄ is regarded as a promising hydrogen storage material due to its high hydrogen density. In this study, the dehydrogenation properties of LiBH₄ were remarkably enhanced by doping hydrogenated Mg₃RE compounds (RE denotes La, Ce, Nd rare earth metals), which are composed of nanostructured MgH₂ and REH_2+x (denoted as H − Mg₃RE). For the LiBH₄ + H − Mg₃La mixture, the component LiBH₄ desorbed 6 wt.% hydrogen even at a relatively low temperature of 340 °C, far lower than the desorption temperature of pure LiBH₄ or the 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ system. This kinetic improvement is attributed to the hydrogen exchange mechanism between the H − Mg₃La and LiBH₄, in the sense that the decomposition of MgH₂ and LaH_2+x catalyzed the dehydrogenation of LiBH₄ through hydrogen exchange effect rather than mutual chemical reaction requiring higher temperature and hydrogen pressure. However, prior to fast hydrogen release, the hydrogen exchange effect suppressed the dehydriding of MgH₂ and elevated its desorption temperature. It is expected to strengthen the hydrogen exchange effect by compositing the LiBH₄ with other nanosized metal hydrides and to obtain better dehydrogenation properties.     

Hydrogen sorption in MgH2-based composites: The role of Ni and LiBH4 additives

In the present work we investigate the hydrogen sorption properties of composites in the MgH₂–Ni, MgH₂–Ni–LiH and MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ systems and analyze why Ni addition improve hydrogen sorption rates while LiBH₄ enhance the hydrogen storage capacity. Although all composites with Ni addition showed significantly improved hydrogen storage kinetics compared with the pure MgH₂, the fastest hydrogen sorption kinetics is obtained for Ni-doped MgH₂. The formation of Mg₂Ni/Mg₂NiH₄ in Ni-doped MgH₂ composite and its microstructure allows to uptake 5.0 wt% of hydrogen in 25 s and to release it in 8 min at 275 °C. In the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite, decomposition of LiBH₄ occurs during the first dehydriding leading to the formation of diborane, which has a Ni catalyst poison effect via the formation of a passivating boron layer. A combination of FTIR, XRD and volumetric measurements demonstrate that the formation of MgNi₃B₂ in the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite happens in the subsequent hydriding cycle from the reaction between Mg₂Ni/Mg₂NiH₄ and B. Activation energy analysis demonstrates that the presence of Ni particles has a catalytic effect in MgH₂–Ni and MgH₂–Ni–LiH systems, but it is practically nullified by the addition of LiBH₄. The beneficial role of LiBH₄ on the hydrogen storage capacity of the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite is discussed.     

Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4 modified by NbF5

In this work, the hydriding–dehydriding properties of the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures were investigated. It was found that the dehydrogenation and reversibility properties of LiBH₄ were significantly improved by NbF₅. Temperature-programed dehydrogenation (TPD) showed that 5LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample started releasing hydrogen from as low as 60 °C, and 4 wt.% hydrogen could be obtained below 255 °C. Meanwhile, ∼7 wt.% H₂ could be reached at 400 °C in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample, whereas pristine LiBH₄ only released ∼0.7 wt.% H₂. In addition, reversibility measurement demonstrated that over 4.4 wt.% H₂ could still be released even during the fifth dehydrogenation in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample. The experimental results suggested that a new borohydride possibly formed during ball milling the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures might be the source of the active effect of NbF₅ on LiBH₄.     

Hydrogen storage performance of 5LiBH4 + Mg2FeH6 composite system

The hydrogen storage properties of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ reactive hydride composites for reversible hydrogen storage were investigated by comparing with the 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ composite in the present work. The dehydrogenation pathway and reaction mechanism of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite were also investigated and elucidated. The self-decomposition of Mg₂FeH₆ leads to the in situ formation of Mg and Fe particles on the surface of LiBH₄, resulting in a well dispersion between different reacting phases. The formation of FeB is observed during the dehydrogenation of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite, which might supplies nucleation sites of MgB₂ during the dehydrogenation process, but is not an ascendant catalyst for the self-decomposition of LiBH₄. And FeB can also transform to the LiBH₄ and Fe by reacting with LiH and H₂ during the rehydrogenation process. The dehydrogenation capacity for 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite still gets to 6.5 wt% even after four cycles. The X-ray diffraction analyses reveal the phase transitions during the hydriding and dehydriding cycle. The formed FeB in the composite maintains a nanostructure after four hydriding-dehydriding cycles. The loss of hydrogen storage capacity and de-/rehydrogenation kinetics can be attributed to the incomplete generation of Mg₂FeH₆ during the rehydrogenation process.     

Hydrogen generation from the ball milled composites of sodium and lithium borohydride (NaBH4/LiBH4) and magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) without and with the nanometric nickel (Ni) additive

The composites of (NaBH₄+2Mg(OH)₂) and (LiBH₄+2Mg(OH)₂) without and with nanometric Ni (n-Ni) added as a potential catalyst were synthesized by high energy ball milling. The ball milled NaBH₄-based composite desorbs hydrogen in one exothermic reaction in contrast to its LiBH₄-based counterpart which dehydrogenates in two reactions: an exothermic and endothermic. The NaBH₄-based composite starts desorbing hydrogen at 240 °C. Its ball milled LiBH₄-based counterpart starts desorbing at 200 °C. The latter initially desorbs hydrogen rapidly but then the rate of desorption suddenly decelerates. The estimated apparent activation energy for the NaBH₄-based composite without and with n-Ni is equal to 152 ± 2.2 and 157 ± 0.9 kJ/mol, respectively. In contrast, the apparent activation energy for the initial rapid dehydrogenation for the LiBH₄-based composite is very low being equal to 47 ± 2 and 38 ± 9 kJ/mol for the composite without and with the n-Ni additive, respectively. XRD phase studies after volumetric isothermal dehydrogenation tests show the presence of NaBO₂ and MgO for the NaBH₄-based composite. For the LiBH₄-based composite phases such as MgO, Li₃BO₃, MgB₂, MgB₆ are the products of the first exothermic reaction which has a theoretical H₂ capacity of 8.1 wt.%. However, for reasons which are not quite clear, the first reaction never goes to full completion even at 300 °C desorbing ∼4.5 wt.% H₂ at this temperature. The products of the second endothermic reaction for the LiBH₄-based composite are MgO, MgB₆, B and LiMgBO₃ and the reaction has a theoretical H₂ capacity of 2.26 wt.%. The effect of the addition of 5 wt.% nanometric Ni on the dehydrogenation behavior of both the NaBH₄-and LiBH₄-based composites is rather negligible. The n-Ni additive may not be the optimal catalyst for these hydride composite systems although more tests are required since only one n-Ni content was examined.     

Effect of SWNTs on the reversible hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4–MgH2 composite

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) were mechanically milled with LiBH₄/MgH₂ mixture, and examined with respect to its effect on the reversible dehydrogenation properties of the Li–Mg–B–H system. Experimental results show that the addition of SWNTs results in an enhanced dehydriding rate and improved cyclic stability of the LiBH₄/MgH₂ composite. For example, the LiBH₄/MgH₂ composite with 10 wt% purified SWNTs additive can release nearly 10 wt% hydrogen within 20 min at 450 °C, with an average dehydriding rate over 2 times faster than that of the neat LiBH₄/MgH₂ sample. Based on the results of phase analysis and a series of designed experiments, the mechanism underlying the observed property improvement was discussed.     

Improvement of hydrogen-storage properties of MgH2 by Ni,LiBH4, and Ti addition

In this work, differently from our previous work, MgH₂ instead of Mg was used as a starting material. Ni, Ti, and LiBH₄ with a high hydrogen-storage capacity of 18.4 wt% were added. A sample with a composition of MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti was prepared by reactive mechanical grinding. MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti after reactive mechanical grinding contained MgH₂, Mg, Ni, TiH_1.924, and MgO phases. The activation of MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti for hydriding and dehydriding reactions was not required. At the number of cycles, n = 2, MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti absorbed 4.09 wt% H for 5 min, 4.25 wt% H for 10 min, and 4.44 wt% H for 60 min at 573 K under 12 bar H₂. At n = 1, MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti desorbed 0.13 wt% H for 10 min, 0.54 wt% H for 20 min, 1.07 wt% H for 30 min, and 1.97 wt% H for 60 min at 573 K under 1.0 bar H₂. The PCT (Pressure–Composition–Temperature) curve at 593 K for MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti showed that its hydrogen-storage capacity was 5.10 wt%. The inverse dependence of the hydriding rate on temperature is partly due to a decrease in the pressure differential between the applied hydrogen pressure and the equilibrium plateau pressure with the increase in temperature. The rate-controlling step for the dehydriding reaction of the MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti at n = 1 was analyzed.     

A comparative study of LiBH4-based composites with metal hydrides and fluorides for hydrogen storage

A comparative study was performed on four LiBH₄-based hydrogen storage composites 2LiBH₄ + MgX₂ and 6LiBH₄ + CaX₂ (X = H and F). The composites with fluorides and those with corresponding hydrides exhibited similar hydrogen storage properties. The dehydrogenation of 2LiBH₄ + MgF₂ demonstrated a strong dependence on the hydrogen back pressure, similar to that of 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂. The reversible hydrogen storage of 2LiBH₄ + MgF₂ was achieved under a back pressure of 5 bar at 450 °C. Dehydrogenation under lower H₂ pressures resulted in the production of Mg and thus a partial reversibility. In contrast, both 6LiBH₄ + CaH₂ and 6LiBH₄ + CaF₂ revealed reversible hydrogen storage properties regardless of the hydrogen back pressure. The structural difference between MgB₂ and CaB₆ may account for the observed differences in hydrogen storage properties of the Mg- and Ca-containing LiBH₄ reactive composites.     

Hydrogen storage behavior of 2LiBH4/MgH2 composites improved by the catalysis of CoNiB nanoparticles

2LiBH₄/MgH₂ system is a representative and promising reactive hydride composite for hydrogen storage. However, the high desorption temperature and sluggish desorption kinetics hamper its practical application. In our present report, we successfully introduce CoNiB nanoparticles as catalysts to improve the dehydrogenation performances of the 2LiBH₄/MgH₂ composite. The sample with CoNiB additives shows a significant desorption property. Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) measurement demonstrates that the peak decomposition temperatures of MgH₂ and LiBH₄ are lowered to be 315 °C and 417 °C for the CoNiB-doped 2LiBH₄/MgH₂. Isothermal dehydrogenation analysis demonstrates that approximately 10.2 wt% hydrogen can be released within 360 min at 400 °C. In addition, this study gives a preliminary evidence for understanding the CoNiB catalytic mechanism of 2LiBH₄/MgH₂     

Mechanical milling of Mg,Ni and Y powder mixture and investigating the effects of produced nanostructured MgNi4Y on hydrogen desorption properties of MgH2

It has been reported that intermetallic compounds could be used to improve hydrogen storage properties of Mg-based alloys. In this study, an attempt was made to synthesize the MgNi₄Y compound from pure Ni, Mg and Y elemental powders via the combination of mechanical milling and heat treatment methods. In this regard, powders were ball milled in different conditions and then heat treated at 400 and 600 °C for 4 h to investigate the effect of temperature on the formation of MgNi₄Y intermetallic compound. The characteristics of mixtures were evaluated via (XRD) and (SEM) methods. It was found from the results of XRD analysis that ternary intermetallic compound was not formed completely via ball milling alone. Nanostructured intermetallic compound was formed after heat treatment of milled powder at 600 °C for 25 h. Furthermore, addition of 5 and 10 wt% of the produced intermetallic compound to MgH₂ decreased hydrogen desorption temperature and increased released hydrogen content.     

Enhanced hydrogen desorption from the Co-catalyzed LiBH4–Mg(BH4)2 eutectic composite

Co-based catalyst can significantly improve the dehydrogenation kinetics of the eutectic composite of LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂ (1/1 M ratio). The onset hydrogen desorption temperature of the composite is at about 155 °C, which is ca. 245, 110 or 27 °C lower than that of LiBH₄, Mg(BH₄)₂ or pristine LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂, respectively. Upon holding the samples at 270 °C, the Co catalyzed composite can release hydrogen at a rate 1.6 times faster than that of the pristine one. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) characterization evidenced that Co was in a reduced state of Co⁺ which may serve as the functional species in catalyzing the dehydrogenation of the composite.     

Synthesis and hydriding properties of Li2Mg(NH)2

The phase pure Li₂Mg(NH)₂ has been synthesized via a dehydriding treatment of a ball milled 2LiNH₂ + MgH₂ mixture. This phase pure Li₂Mg(NH)₂ has been utilized to investigate its hydriding kinetics at the temperature range 180-220 °C. It is found that the hydriding process of Li₂Mg(NH)₂ is very sluggish even though it has favorable thermodynamic properties for near the ambient temperature operation. Holding at 200 °C for 10 h only results in 3.75 wt.% H₂ uptake. The detailed kinetic analysis reveals that the hydriding process of Li₂Mg(NH)₂ is diffusion-controlled. Thus, this study unambiguously indicates that the future direction to enhance the hydriding kinetics of this promising hydrogen storage material system should be to minimize the diffusion distance and increase the diffusion rate.     

Destabilization effects of Mg(AlH4)2 on MgH2: Improved desorption performances and its reaction mechanism

Both kinetics and thermodynamics properties of MgH₂ are significantly improved by the addition of Mg(AlH₄)₂. The as-prepared MgH₂–Mg(AlH₄)₂ composite displays superior hydrogen desorption performances, which starts to desorb hydrogen at 90 °C, and a total amount of 7.76 wt% hydrogen is released during its decomposition. The enthalpy of MgH₂-relevant desorption is 32.3 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂ in the MgH₂–Mg(AlH₄)₂ composite, obviously decreased than that of pure MgH₂. The dehydriding mechanism of MgH₂–Mg(AlH₄)₂ composite is systematically investigated by using x-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry. Firstly, Mg(AlH₄)₂ decomposes and produces active Al^∗. Subsequently, the in-situ formed Al^∗ reacts with MgH₂ and forms Mg–Al alloys. For its reversibility, the products are fully re-hydrogenated into MgH₂ and Al^∗, under 3 MPa H₂ pressure at 300 °C for 5 h.     

Desorption kinetics of lithium amide/magnesium hydride systems at constant pressure thermodynamic driving forces

Lithium amide and magnesium hydride are lightweight materials with high hydrogen-holding capacities and thus they are of interest for hydrogen storage. In the present work mixtures with initial molar compositions of (LiNH₂ + MgH₂) and (2LiNH₂ + MgH₂) were ball milled with and without the presence of 3.3 mol% potassium hydride dopant. Temperature programmed desorption, TPD, analyses of the mixtures showed that the potassium hydride doped samples had lower onset temperatures than their corresponding pristine samples. The dehydrogenation kinetics of the doped and pristine mixtures was compared at 210 °C. In each case a constant pressure thermodynamic driving force was applied in which the ratio of the plateau pressure to the applied hydrogen pressure was set at 10. Under equivalent conditions, the (LiNH₂ + MgH₂) mixture desorbed hydrogen about 4 times faster than the (2LiNH₂ + MgH₂) mixture. The addition of potassium hydride dopant was found to have a 25-fold increase on the desorption rates of the (2LiNH₂ + MgH₂) mixture, however it had almost no effect on the desorption rates of the (LiNH₂ + MgH₂) mixture. Activation energies were determined by the Kissinger method. Results showed the potassium hydride doped mixtures to have lower activation energies than the pristine mixtures.     

Synthesis and hydrogen storage thermodynamics and kinetics of Mg(AlH4)2 submicron rods

Mg(AlH₄)₂ submicron rods with 96.1% purity have been successfully synthesized in a modified mechanochemical reaction process followed by Soxhlet extraction. ∼9.0 wt% of hydrogen is released from the as-prepared Mg(AlH₄)₂ at 125–440 °C through a stepwise reaction. Upon dehydriding, Mg(AlH₄)₂ decomposes first to generate MgH₂ and Al. Subsequently, the newly produced MgH₂ reacts with Al to form a Al_0.9Mg_0.1 solid solution. Finally, further reaction between the Al_0.9Mg_0.1 solid solution and the remaining MgH₂ gives rise to the formation of Al₃Mg₂. The first step dehydrogenation is a diffusion-controlled reaction with an apparent activation energy of ∼123.0 kJ/mol. Therefore, increasing the mobility of the species involved in Mg(AlH₄)₂ will be very helpful for improving its dehydrogenation kinetics.     

Desorption properties of MgH2 composite with a composition of 40MgH2 + 37LiBH4 + 18MgF2 + 5Ti isopropoxide

In order to increase the hydrogen storage capacity of Mg-based materials, a mixture with a composition of 2LiBH₄ + MgF₂ and LiBH₄, which has a hydrogen storage capacity of 18.4 wt%, were added to MgH₂. Ti isopropoxide was also added to MgH₂ as a catalyst. A MgH₂ composite with a composition of 40 wt%MgH₂ + 25 wt%LiBH₄ + 30 wt% (2LiBH₄ + MgF₂) + 5 wt%Ti isopropoxide (corresponding to 40 wt%MgH₂ + 37 wt%LiBH₄ + 18 wt%MgF₂ + 5 wt%Ti isopropoxide) was prepared by reactive mechanical grinding. The hydrogen storage properties of the sample were then examined. Hydrogen content vs. desorption time curves for consecutive 1st desorptions of 40 wt%MgH₂ + 37 wt%LiBH₄ + 18 wt%MgF₂ + 5 wt%Ti isopropoxide from room temperature to 823 K showed that the total desorbed hydrogen quantity for consecutive 1st desorptions was 8.30 wt%.     

A comparative study for synthesis methods of nano-structured (9Ni–2Mg–Y) alloy catalysts and effect of the produced alloy on hydrogen desorption properties of MgH2

9Ni–2Mg–Y alloy powders were prepared by arc melting, induction melting, mechanical alloying, solid state reaction and subsequent ball milling processes. The results showed that melting processes are not suitable for preparation of 9Ni–2Mg–Y alloy due to high losses of Mg and Y. Therefore, 9Ni–2Mg–Y alloy powder was prepared by three methods including: 1) mechanical alloying, 2) mechanical alloying + solid state reaction + ball milling, and 3) mixing + solid state reaction + ball milling. The prepared 9Ni–2Mg–Y alloy powders were compared for their catalytic effects on hydrogen desorption of MgH₂. It is found that 9Ni–2Mg–Y alloy powder prepared by mechanical alloying + solid state reaction + ball milling method has a smaller particle size (1–5 μm) and higher surface area (1.7 m² g⁻¹) than that of other methods. H₂ desorption tests revealed that addition of 9Ni–2Mg–Y alloy prepared by mechanical alloying + solid state reaction + ball milling to MgH₂ decreases the hydrogen desorption temperature of MgH₂ from 425 to 210 °C and improves the hydrogen desorption capacity from 0 to 3.5 wt.% at 350 °C during 8 min.     

Reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH4/Ca(AlH4)2 systems

To improve the hydrogen storage property of LiBH₄, the LiBH₄/Ca(AlH₄)₂ reactive systems with various ratios were constructed, and their de-/hydrogenation properties as well as the reaction mechanisms were investigated experimentally. It was found that the sample with the LiBH₄ to Ca(AlH₄)₂ molar ratio of 6:1 exhibits the best comprehensive hydrogen storage properties, desorbing hydrogen completely (8.2 wt.%) within 35 min at 450 °C and reversibly absorbing 4.5 wt.% of hydrogen at 450 °C under a hydrogen pressure as low as 4.0 MPa. During the first dehydrogenation process of the LiBH₄/Ca(AlH₄)₂ systems, the CaH₂ and Al particles were in situ precipitated via the self-decomposition of Ca(AlH₄)₂, and then reacted with LiBH₄ to form CaB₆, AlB₂ and LiH. Whereafter, the sample can cycle between LiBH₄ + Ca(BH₄)₂ + Al in the hydrogenated state and CaB₆ + AlB₂ + LiH in the dehydrogenated state.     

Effect of LiH on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

Recent works showed that the addition of LiBH₄ significantly improves the sorption kinetics of MgH₂, and LiH decomposed from LiBH₄ was supposed to play the catalytic effect on MgH₂. In order to clarify this mechanism, the effect of LiH on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of MgH₂ was systematically investigated. The hydrogenation kinetics of LiH-doped samples, as well as the morphology after several cycles, was similar to those of pure MgH₂, which indicate that Li⁺ had no catalytic effect on the hydrogenation of Mg. Moreover, the addition of LiH strongly retarded the hydrogen desorption of MgH₂ doped with/without Nb₂O₅, and resulted in higher starting temperature of desorption, larger activation energy and larger pressure hysteresis of PCI curves of MgH₂. H₂, HD and D₂ were observed in the desorption products of MgH₂-2LiD, which confirms that H–H exchange indeed occurs between MgH₂ and LiH, hence deteriorate desorption kinetics/thermodynamics of MgH_2. The results implied that the additives containing H⁻ could retard the hydrogen desorption of MgH₂ by H–H exchange effect.