Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4 modified by NbF5

In this work, the hydriding–dehydriding properties of the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures were investigated. It was found that the dehydrogenation and reversibility properties of LiBH₄ were significantly improved by NbF₅. Temperature-programed dehydrogenation (TPD) showed that 5LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample started releasing hydrogen from as low as 60 °C, and 4 wt.% hydrogen could be obtained below 255 °C. Meanwhile, ∼7 wt.% H₂ could be reached at 400 °C in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample, whereas pristine LiBH₄ only released ∼0.7 wt.% H₂. In addition, reversibility measurement demonstrated that over 4.4 wt.% H₂ could still be released even during the fifth dehydrogenation in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample. The experimental results suggested that a new borohydride possibly formed during ball milling the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures might be the source of the active effect of NbF₅ on LiBH₄.     

Destabilization of LiBH4 by nanoconfinement in PMMA–co–BM polymer matrix for reversible hydrogen storage

Destabilization of LiBH₄ by nanoconfinement in poly (methyl methacrylate)–co–butyl methacrylate (PMMA–co–BM), denoted as nano LiBH₄–PMMA–co–BM, is proposed for reversible hydrogen storage. The onset dehydrogenation temperature of nano LiBH₄–PMMA–co–BM is reduced to ∼80 °C (ΔT = 340 and 170 °C as compared with milled LiBH₄ and nanoconfined LiBH₄ in carbon aerogel, respectively). At 120 °C under vacuum, nano LiBH₄–PMMA–co–BM releases 8.8 wt.% H₂ with respect to LiBH₄ content within 4 h during the 1st dehydrogenation, while milled LiBH₄ performs no dehydrogenation at the same temperature and pressure condition. Moreover, nano LiBH₄–PMMA–co–BM can be rehydrogenated at the mildest condition (140 °C under 50 bar H₂ for 12 h) among other modified LiBH₄ reported in the previous literature. Due to the hydrophobicity of PMMA–co–BM host, deterioration of LiBH₄ by oxygen and humidity in ambient condition is avoided after nanoconfinement. Although the interaction between LiBH₄ and the pendant group of PMMA–co–BM leads to a reduced hydrogen storage capacity, significant destabilization of LiBH₄ is accomplished.     

Comprehensive hydrogen storage properties and catalytic mechanism studies of 2LiBH4–MgH2 system with NbF5 in various addition amounts

In the present work, the role of NbF₅ addition amount in affecting the comprehensive hydrogen storage properties (dehydrogenation, rehydrogenation, cycling performance, hydrogen capacity) of 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ system as well as the catalytic mechanism of NbF₅ have been systematically studied. It is found that increasing the addition amount of NbF₅ to the 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ system not only results in dehydrogenation temperature reduction and hydriding–dehydriding kinetics enhancement but also leads to the de/rehydrogenation capacity loss. Compared with other samples, 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ doping with NbF₅ in weight ratios of 40:4 exhibits superior comprehensive hydrogen storage properties, which can stably release ∼8.31 wt.% hydrogen within 2.5 h under 4 bar H₂ and absorb ∼8.79 wt.% hydrogen within 10 min under 65 bar H₂ at 400 °C even up to 20 cycling. As far as we know, this is the first time that excellent reversibility as high as 20 cycles without obvious degradation tendency in both of hydrogen capacity and reaction rate has been achieved in the 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ system. The further experimental study reveals that the highly catalytic effects of NbF₅ on the 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ system are derived from the reaction between NbF₅ and LiBH₄, which provides a fundamental insight into the catalytic mechanism of NbF₅.     

Effects of nano additives on hydrogen storage behavior of the multinary complex hydride LiBH4/LiNH2/MgH2

Multinary complex hydrides comprised of borohydrides, amides and metal hydrides have been synthesized using the solid state mechano-chemical process. After the optimization of the system, it was found that LiBH₄/LiNH₂/MgH₂ exhibits potential reversible hydrogen storage behavior (>6 wt.%) at temperatures of 125–175 °C. To further improve the hydrogen performance of the system, various nano additives namely, nickel, cobalt, iron, copper, and manganese were investigated. It was observed that some of these additives (Co, Ni) lowered the hydrogen release temperature at least 75–100 °C in the major hydrogen decomposition step. While other additives acted as catalysts and increased the rate at which hydrogen was released. Combinatorial addition of selected materials were also investigated and found to have both a positive effect on kinetics and reduction in hydrogen desorption temperature.     

Promoted hydrogen release from 3LiBH4/MnF2 composite by doping LiNH2: Elimination of diborane release and reduction of decomposition temperature

The evolution of diborane accompanying H₂ release during the decomposition of transition metal borohydrides reduces the purity of evolved hydrogen and results in capacity loss during cycling. To solve the problem, a small amount of LiNH₂ is doped into a 3LiBH₄/MnF₂ composite and the decomposition properties are investigated. The results show that after doping LiNH₂, the formation of diborane during decomposition is effectively suppressed meanwhile the decomposition temperature is significantly reduced. Around 5 wt.% pure hydrogen can be released at 95–140 °C from 5 wt.% LiNH₂-doped 3LiBH₄/MnF₂ composite. These improvements in the decomposition performance are mainly attributed to the prevention of the formation of B–H–B bonds for B₂H₆ and the destabilization of B–H bonds in borohydrides by the interaction of BH₄⁻ and NH₂⁻.     

Combined effects of hydrogen back-pressure and NbF5 addition on the dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation kinetics of the LiBH4–MgH2 composite system

It is well known that the dehydrogenation pathway of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ composite system is highly reliant on whether decomposition is performed under vacuum or a hydrogen back-pressure. In this work, the effects of hydrogen back-pressure and NbF₅ addition on the dehydrogenation kinetics of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ system are studied under either vacuum or hydrogen back-pressure, as well as the subsequent rehydrogenation and cycling. For the pristine sample, faster desorption kinetics was obtained under vacuum, but the performance is compromised by slow absorption kinetics. In contrast, hydrogen back-pressure remarkably promotes the absorption kinetics and increases the reversible hydrogen storage capacity, but with the penalty of much slower desorption kinetics. These drawbacks were overcome after doping with NbF₅, with which the dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation kinetics was significantly improved. In particular, the enhanced kinetics was observed to persist well, even after 9 cycles, in the case of the NbF₅ doped sample under hydrogen back-pressure, as well as the suppression of forming Li₂B₁₂H₁₂. Furthermore, the mechanism that is behind these effects of NbF₅ additive on the reversible dehydrogenation reaction of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ system is discussed.     

The milled LiBH4/h-BN composites exhibiting unexpected hydrogen storage kinetics and reversibility

The effect of nanoscale h-BN addition by milling on the de-/re-hydrogenation of LiBH₄ was investigated. With the increasing h-BN ratio, the milled LiBH₄/h-BN composites showed lower dehydrogenation temperature. For the LiBH₄-3BN composite (mole ratio 1:3), the on-set dehydrogenation temperature was reduced from 290 °C for the milled pure LiBH₄ down to 175 °C, and the initial dehydrogenation capacity could reach 3.1 wt.% (equivalent to 13.7 wt.% of the component LiBH₄) within ～2 h at 400 °C. Under moderate rehydrogenation conditions of 400 °C and 10 MPa H₂ pressure, the 2nd and 3th cyclic dehydrogenation capacity of LiBH₄-3BN composite almost remained unchanged, indicating remarkably improved rehydrogenation reversibility in comparison to milled pure LiBH₄. FTIR analysis reveals specific interaction between h-BN and LiBH₄ probably originating from the polar mechanism between polarizable B–H bond and B–N bond, which should be responsible for the enhanced dehydrogenation kinetics and reversibility. This work demonstrates the specific catalytic role of nanoscale h-BN and its potential for reversible hydrogen storage by compositing with high-capacity borohydrides.     

Destabilization of LiBH4 by MH2 (M = Ce, La) for hydrogen storage: Nanostructural effects on the hydrogen sorption kinetics

Destabilization of LiBH₄ by addition of metal hydrides or borohydrides is a powerful strategy to develop new promising hydrogen storage systems. In this study, we compare the destabilization behavior of the LiBH₄ by addition of MH₂ (M = La, Ce). A notable improvement in the hydrogen desorption temperature, the rate and the weight percentage of hydrogen released is observed for LiBH₄-MH₂ with respect to LiBH₄. Formation of LaB₆ and CeB₆ after dehydriding of the composites is proved by PXRD. Remarkable hydrogen storage reversibility of LiBH₄-MH₂ composites is confirmed under moderate conditions: 400 °C and 6.0 MPa of hydrogen pressure for 4 h without catalyst. The LiBH₄-LaH₂ composite exhibits improved hydrogen desorption performance compared with LiBH₄-CeH₂ composite, but the hydrogen storage reversibility is inferior. Notably, the LiBH₄-CeH₂ nanocomposite produced by in situ formation of CeH₂ from Ce(BH₄)₃-LiH displays excellent hydrogen storage properties. The addition of ZrCl₄ as a catalyst improves dehydriding kinetics. The mechanism underlying the enhancement in the LiBH₄-MH₂ composites is also discussed. Our study is the first work about reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH₄-LaH₂.     

Remarkable irreversible and reversible dehydrogenation of LiBH4 by doping with nanosized cobalt metalloid compounds

Nanosized cobalt sulfide and cobalt boride were synthesized and doped into LiBH₄ to improve the dehydrogenation properties of this important candidate for hydrogen storage. With respect to CoS_x doping, the dehydrogenation temperature (peak temperature observed by mass spectrometry) of pristine LiBH₄ can be reduced from 440 °C to 175 °C with a maximum capacity of 6.7 wt% at 50% doping. Unfortunately, B₂H₆ is liberated and the process is not reversible because the CoS_x dopant reacts with LiBH₄ to form more stable compounds. By changing CoS_x to CoB_x, a reversible dehydrogenation was realized with greatly improved reversibility. The dehydrogenation temperature was reduced to 350 °C with a maximum capacity of 8.4 wt% at 50% doping amount. It is very significant that CoB_x is stable and the release of B₂H₆ is eliminated. A reversible hydrogen desorption of about 5.3 wt% can be achieved with a LiBH₄ + 50% CoB_x mixture under a mild rehydrogenation condition of 400 °C at 10 MPa H₂. It is obvious that CoS_x acts as a reactant even though the dehydrogenation is greatly enhanced, while CoB_x behaves as a catalyst significantly promoting the dehydrogenation and reversibility of LiBH₄.     

Interface effects in NaAlH4–carbon nanocomposites for hydrogen storage

For practical solid-state hydrogen storage, reversibility under mild conditions is crucial. Complex metal hydrides such as NaAlH₄ and LiBH₄ have attractive hydrogen contents. However, hydrogen release and especially uptake after desorption are sluggish and require high temperatures and pressures. Kinetics can be greatly enhanced by nanostructuring, for instance by confining metal hydrides in a porous carbon scaffold. We present for a detailed study of the impact of the nature of the carbon–metal hydride interface on the hydrogen storage properties. Nanostructures were prepared by melt infiltration of either NaAlH₄ or LiBH₄ into a carbon scaffold, of which the surface had been modified, varying from H-terminated to oxidized (up to 4.4 O/nm²). It has been suggested that the chemical and electronic properties of the carbon/metal hydride interface can have a large influence on hydrogen storage properties. However, no significant impact on the first H₂ release temperatures was found. In contrast, the surface properties of the carbon played a major role in determining the reversible hydrogen storage capacity. Only a part of the oxygen-containing groups reacted with hydrides during melt infiltration, but further reaction during cycling led to significant losses, with reversible hydrogen storage capacity loss up to 40% for surface oxidized carbon. However, if the carbon surface had been hydrogen terminated, ∼6 wt% with respect to the NaAlH₄ weight was released in the second cycle, corresponding to 95% reversibility. This clearly shows that control over the nature and amount of surface groups offers a strategy to achieve fully reversible hydrogen storage in complex metal hydride-carbon nanocomposites.     

Synthesis and hydrogen storage properties of lithium borohydride amidoborane complex

A series of mixtures of LiAB/LiBH₄ with different molar ratios were prepared and their hydrogen storage properties were investigated in this study. Among them, a new structure was found in the LiAB/LiBH₄ sample with a molar ratio of 1/1. It is of orthorhombic structure and composed of alternative layers of LiAB and LiBH₄. It shows similar hydrogen desorption behaviors of LiAB–LiBH₄ and LiAB–0.5LiBH₄. For use in hydrogen storage, high hydrogen capacity and low operation temperature are demanded, thus, the dehydrogenation properties of LiAB–0.5LiBH₄ were subsequently measured. Three steps of desorption were observed during the heating process, with a total release of 11.5 wt% H₂ at 500 °C. The reaction path was identified using a combined investigation of XRD and ¹¹B solid state NMR. Dehydrogenation kinetic analyses show that the complex has lower activation energy (61 ± 4 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂) than that of LiAB (71 ± 5 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂). It is likely that dehydrogenation process was promoted due to the presence of LiBH₄.     

Superior dehydrogenation performance of nanoscale lithium borohydride modified with fluorographite

A significant enhancement in the dehydrogenation performance of LiBH₄ is achieved by modifying with fluorographite (FGi). In-depth investigations show that the dehydrogenation thermodynamics and kinetics of LiBH₄ are strongly improved by ball milling LiBH₄ with FGi. The ball-milled LiBH₄–FGi (mass ratio of 1:1) composite starts to release hydrogen without impurity gas at around 180 °C, and obtains a hydrogen desorption capacity of 7.2 wt% below 200 °C in seconds, which is improved dramatically compared with pristine ball-milled LiBH₄. Microscopic morphology indicates that numerous ∼90 nm spots formed on the surface of FGi. Based on the microstructure analyses combined with hydrogen storage performances, the prominent effect of FGi is largely attributed to the nano-modifying effect and the exothermic reaction between LiBH₄ and FGi during the dehydrogenation process. Furthermore, partial reversibility of the LiBH₄–FGi composite has been demonstrated and the mechanism underlying the cycling capacity loss is discussed. The use of FGi may shed light on future study on searching for new strategies to improve both the thermodynamics and kinetics of light-metal complex hydrides.     

Reversible hydrogen storage from 6LiBH4-MCl3 (M = Ce, Gd) composites by in-situ formation of MH2

Different destabilized LiBH₄ systems with several interacting components are being explored for hydrogen storage applications. In this study, hydrogen sorption properties of as-milled 6LiBH₄-MCl₃ composites (M = Ce, Gd) are investigated by X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and thermovolumetric measurements. The chemical interaction between metal halides and LiBH₄ decreases the dehydrogenation temperature in comparison with as-milled LiBH₄. Hydrogen release starts at 220 °C from the decomposition of M(BH₄)₃ formed during milling and proceeds through destabilization of LiBH₄ by in-situ formed MH₂. The dehydrogenation products CeB₆-LiH and GdB₄-LiH can be rehydrided under moderate conditions, i.e 400 °C and 6.0 MPa of hydrogen pressure for 2 h without catalyst. A new 6LiBH₄-CeCl₃-3LiH composite shows promissory hydrogen storage properties via the formation by milling of CeH_2+x. Our study is the first work about reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH₄-MCl₃ composites destabilized by in-situ formed MH₂.     

Nanoconfined 2LiBH4–MgH2–TiCl3 in carbon aerogel scaffold for reversible hydrogen storage

Nanoconfinement of 2LiBH₄–MgH₂–TiCl₃ in resorcinol–formaldehyde carbon aerogel scaffold (RF–CAS) for reversible hydrogen storage applications is proposed. RF–CAS is encapsulated with approximately 1.6 wt. % TiCl₃ by solution impregnation technique, and it is further nanoconfined with bulk 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ via melt infiltration. Faster dehydrogenation kinetics is obtained after TiCl₃ impregnation, for example, nanoconfined 2LiBH₄–MgH₂–TiCl₃ requires ∼1 and 4.5 h, respectively, to release 95% of the total hydrogen content during the 1st and 2nd cycles, while nanoconfined 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ (∼2.5 and 7 h, respectively) and bulk material (∼23 and 22 h, respectively) take considerably longer. Moreover, 95–98.6% of the theoretical H₂ storage capacity (3.6–3.75 wt. % H₂) is reproduced after four hydrogen release and uptake cycles of the nanoconfined 2LiBH₄–MgH₂–TiCl₃. The reversibility of this hydrogen storage material is confirmed by the formation of LiBH₄ and MgH₂ after rehydrogenation using FTIR and SR-PXD techniques, respectively.     

Reversible hydrogen storage in a 3NaBH4/YF3 composite

A 3NaBH₄/YF₃ hydrogen storage composite was prepared through ball milling and its hydrogen sorption properties were investigated. It is shown that NaBH₄ does not react with YF₃ during ball milling. The dehydrogenation of the composite starts at 423 °C, which is about 100 °C lower than the dehydrogenation temperature of pure NaBH₄, with a mass loss of 4.12 wt%. Pressure–Composition–Temperature tests reveal that the composite has reversible hydrogen sorption performance in the temperature range from 350 °C to 413 °C and under quite low hydrogenation plateau pressures (<1 MPa). Its maximum hydrogen storage capacity can reach up to 3.52 wt%. The dehydrogenated composite can absorb 3.2 wt% of hydrogen within 5 min at 400 °C. Based on the Pressure–Composition–Temperature analyses, the hydrogenation enthalpy of the composite is determined to be −46.05 kJ/mol H₂, while the dehydrogenation enthalpy is 176.76 kJ/mol H₂. The mechanism of reversible hydrogen sorption in the composite involves the decomposition and regeneration of NaBH₄ through the reaction with YF₃. Therefore, the addition of the YF₃ to NaBH₄ as a reagent forms a reversible hydrogen storage composite.     

Effective nanoconfinement of 2LiBH4–MgH2 via simply MgH2 premilling for reversible hydrogen storages

To improve nanoconfinement of LiBH₄ and MgH₂ in carbon aerogel scaffold (CAS), particle size reduction of MgH₂ by premilling technique before melt infiltration is proposed. MgH₂ is premilled for 5 h prior to milling with LiBH₄ and nanoconfinement in CAS to obtained nanoconfined 2LiBH₄–premilled MgH₂. Significant confinement of both LiBH₄ and MgH₂ in CAS, confirmed by SEM–EDS–mapping results, is achieved due to MgH₂ premilling. Due to effective nanoconfinement, enhancement of CAS:hydride composite weight ratio to 1:1, resulting in increase of hydrogen storage capacity, is possible. Nanoconfined 2LiBH₄–premilled MgH₂ reveals a single–step dehydrogenation at 345 °C with no B₂H₆ release, while dehydrogenation of nanoconfined sample without MgH₂ premilling performs in multiple steps at elevated temperatures (up to 430 °C) together with considerable amount of B₂H₆ release. Activation energy (E_A) for the main dehydrogenation of nanoconfined 2LiBH₄–premilled MgH₂ is considerably lower than those of LiBH₄ and MgH₂ of bulk 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ (ΔE_A = 31.9 and 55.8 kJ/mol with respect to LiBH₄ and MgH₂, respectively). Approximately twice faster dehydrogenation rate are accomplished after MgH₂ premilling. Three hydrogen release (T = 320 °C, P(H₂) = 3–4 bar) and uptake (T = 320–325 °C, P(H₂) = 84 bar) cycles of nanoconfined 2LiBH₄–premilled MgH₂ reveal up to 4.96 wt. % H₂ (10 wt. % H₂ with respect to hydride composite content), while the 1st desorption of nanoconfined sample without MgH₂ premilling gives 4.30 wt. % of combined B₂H₆ and H₂ gases. It should be remarked that not only kinetic improvement and B₂H₆ suppression are obtained by MgH₂ premilling, but also the lowest dehydrogenation temperature (T = 320 °C) among other modified 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ systems is acquired.     

Effects of MoS2 addition on the hydrogen storage properties of 2LiBH4–MgH2 systems

A 2LiBH₄–MgH₂–MoS₂ composite was prepared by solid-state ball milling, and the effects of MoS₂ as an additive on the hydrogen storage properties of 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ system together with the corresponding mechanism were investigated. As shown in the TG–DSC and MS results, with the addition of 20 wt.% of MoS₂, the onset dehydrogenation temperature is reduced to 206 °C, which is 113 °C lower than that of the pristine 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ system. Meanwhile, the total dehydrogenation amount can be increased from 9.26 wt.% to 10.47 wt.%, and no gas impurities such as B₂H₆ and H₂S are released. Furthermore, MoS₂ improves the dehydrogenation kinetics, and lowers the activation energy (E_a) 34.49 kJ mol⁻¹ of the dehydrogenation reaction between Mg and LiBH₄ to a value lower than that of the pristine 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ sample. According to the XRD test, Li₂S and MoB₂ are formed by the reaction between LiBH₄ and MoS₂, which act as catalysts and are responsible for the improved hydrogen storage properties of the 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ system.     

NEXAFS study of 2LiF–MgB2 composite

Synthesis of lithium borohydridofluorides may pave a new way to pursue improved hydrogen storage properties of LiBH₄ as reversible hydrogen storage materials that fit the fuel cell application. The main products of the hydrogen absorption by 2LiF–MgB₂ composite are MgF₂ and LiBH₄. In addition to them, LiBH_4−xF_x compounds might be present during hydrogen absorption–desorptions and play important role on their kinetics and reversibility.     

Enhanced dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation properties of LiBH4 catalyzed by graphene

The investigation of thermally induced dehydrogenation of LiBH₄ reveals that LiBH₄ doped with the graphene catalysts shows superior dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation performance to that of Vulcan XC-72, carbon nanotube and BP2000 doped LiBH₄. For doping with 20 wt.% graphene, thermal dehydrogenation of LiBH₄ is found to start at ca. 230 °C and a total weight loss of 11.4 wt.% can be obtained below 700 °C. With increased loading of graphene within a LiBH₄ sample, the onset dehydrogenation temperature and the two main desorption peaks from LiBH₄ are found to decrease while the hydrogen release amount is found to increase. Moreover, variation of the equilibrium pressure obtained from isotherms measured at 350–450 °C indicate the dehydrogenation enthalpy is reduced from 74 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂ for pure LiBH₄ to ca. 40 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂ for 20 wt.% graphene doped LiBH₄. Importantly, the reversible dehydrogenation/rehydrogenation process was achieved under 3 MPa H₂ at 400 °C for 10 h, with a capacity of ca. 4.0 wt.% in the tenth cycle. Especially, LiBH₄ is reformed and new species, Li₂B₁₀H₁₀, is detected after the rehydrogenation process.     

Hydrogen storage performance of 5LiBH4 + Mg2FeH6 composite system

The hydrogen storage properties of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ reactive hydride composites for reversible hydrogen storage were investigated by comparing with the 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ composite in the present work. The dehydrogenation pathway and reaction mechanism of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite were also investigated and elucidated. The self-decomposition of Mg₂FeH₆ leads to the in situ formation of Mg and Fe particles on the surface of LiBH₄, resulting in a well dispersion between different reacting phases. The formation of FeB is observed during the dehydrogenation of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite, which might supplies nucleation sites of MgB₂ during the dehydrogenation process, but is not an ascendant catalyst for the self-decomposition of LiBH₄. And FeB can also transform to the LiBH₄ and Fe by reacting with LiH and H₂ during the rehydrogenation process. The dehydrogenation capacity for 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite still gets to 6.5 wt% even after four cycles. The X-ray diffraction analyses reveal the phase transitions during the hydriding and dehydriding cycle. The formed FeB in the composite maintains a nanostructure after four hydriding-dehydriding cycles. The loss of hydrogen storage capacity and de-/rehydrogenation kinetics can be attributed to the incomplete generation of Mg₂FeH₆ during the rehydrogenation process.