Autoepistemic logics as a unifying framework for the semantics of logic programs

In this paper, it is shown that a three-valued autoepistemic logic provides an elegant unifying framework for some of the major semantics of normal and disjunctive logic programs and logic programs with classical negation, namely, the stable semantics, the well-founded semantics, supported models, Fitting's semantics, Kunen's semantics, the stationary semantics, and answer sets. For the first time, so many semantics are embedded into one logic. The framework extends previous results—by Gelfond, Lifschitz, Marek, Subrahmanian, and Truszczynski —on the relationships between logic programming and Moore's autoepistemic logic. The framework suggests several new semantics for negation-as-failure. In particular, we will introduce the epistemic semantics for disjunctive logic programs. In order to motivate the epistemic semantics, an interesting class of applications called ignorance tests will be formalized; it will be proved that ignorance tests can be defined by means of the epistemic semantics, but not by means of the old semantics for disjunctive programs. The autoepistemic framework provides a formal foundation for an environment that integrates different forms of negation. The role of classical negation and various forms of negation-by-failure in logic programming will be briefly discussed.     

Symmetric structure in logic programming

It is argued that some symmetric structure in logic programs could be taken into account when implementing semantics in logic programming. This may enhance the declarative ability or expressive power of the semantics. The work presented here may be seen as representative examples along this line. The focus is on the derivation of negative information and some other classic semantic issues. We first define a permutation group associated with a given logic program. Since usually the canonical models used to reflect the common sense or intended meaning are minimal or completed models of the program, we expose the relationships between minimal models and completed models of the original program and its so-called G-reduced form newly-derived via the permutation group defined. By means of this G-reduced form, we introduce a rule to assume negative information termed G-CWA, which is actually a generalization of the GCWA. We also develop the notions of G-definite, G-hierarchical and G-stratified logic programs,     

Complexity and undecidability results for logic programming

This paper surveys complexity, degree of uncomputability, and expressive power results for logic programming. Some major decision problem complexity results and other results for logic programming are also covered. It also proves several new results filling in previous gaps in the literature. The paper considers seven logic programming semantics: the van Emden-Kowalski semantics for definite (Horn) logic programs; the perfect model semantics for stratified and for locally stratified logic programs; and the two- and three-valued program completion semantics, the well-founded semantics, and the stable semantics, all for normal logic programs, under skeptical inference. The main results concern expressibility and query complexity/uncomputability in five contexts: for propositional logic programs, for first order logic programs with infinite Herbrand universes on their Herbrand universes (a closed domain assumption), for first order logic programs with infinite Herbrand universes on those universes extended with infinitely many new elements (an open domain assumption), and for logic programs without function or constant symbols evaluated over varying extensional databases (DATALOG-type results, data complexity results only) under both closed and open domain assumptions. Several of the open domain assumption results are new to this paper. Other results surveyed are (1) results about the family of all stable models of a program and (2) decision questions about when a logic program has nice properties with respect to a semantics (e.g., a unique stable model). One decision result, for well-founded semantics, is new to this paper.Work supported in part by NSF grant IRI-8905166.     

Disjunctive LP+integrity constraints= stable model semantics

We show that stable models of logic programs may be viewed as minimal models of programs that satisfy certain additional constraints. To do so, we transform the normal programs into disjunctive logic programs and sets of integrity constraints. We show that the stable models of the normal program coincide with the minimal models of the disjunctive program thatsatisfy the integrity constraints. As a consequence, the stable model semantics can be characterized using theextended generalized closed world assumption for disjunctive logic programs. Using this result, we develop a bottomup algorithm for function-free logic programs to find all stable models of a normal program by computing the perfect models of a disjunctive stratified logic program and checking them for consistency with the integrity constraints. The integrity constraints provide a rationale as to why some normal logic programs have no stable models.     

Set based logic programming

In a previous paper (Blair et al. 2001), the authors showed that the mechanism underlying Logic Programming can be extended to handle the situation where the atoms are interpreted as subsets of a given space X. The view of a logic program as a one-step consequence operator along with the concepts of supported and stable model can be transferred to such situations. In this paper, we show that we can further extend this paradigm by creating a new one-step consequence operator by composing the old one-step consequence operator with a monotonic idempotent operator (miop) in the space of all subsets of X, 2 ^X . We call this extension set based logic programming. We show that such a set based formalism for logic programming naturally supports a variety of options. For example, if the underlying space has a topology, one can insist that the new one-step consequence operator always produces a closed set or always produces an open set. The flexibility inherent in the semantics of set based logic programs is due to both the range of natural choices available for specifying the semantics of negation, as well as the role of monotonic idempotent operators (miops) as parameters in the semantics. This leads to a natural type of polymorphism for logic programming, i.e. the same logic program can produce a variety of outcomes depending on the miop associated with the semantics. We develop a general framework for set based programming involving miops. Among the applications, we obtain integer-based representations of real continuous functions as stable models of a set based logic program.      

Running programs backwards: The logical inversion of imperative computation

Imperative programs can be inverted directly from their forward-directed program code with the use of logical inference. The relational semantics of imperative computations treats programs as logical relations over the observable state of the environment, which is taken to be the state of the variables in memory. Program relations denote both forward and backward computations, and the direction of the computation depends upon the instantiation pattern of arguments in the relation. This view of inversion has practical applications when the relational semantics is treated as a logic program. Depending on the logic programming inference scheme used, execution of this relational program can compute the inverse of the imperative program. A number of nontrivial imperative computations can be inverted with minimal logic programming tools.     

Logical approximation for program analysis

The abstract interpretation of programs relates the exact semantics of a programming language to a finite approximation of those semantics. In this article, we describe an approach to abstract interpretation that is based in logic and logic programming. Our approach consists of faithfully representing a transition system within logic and then manipulating this initial specification to create a logical approximation of the original specification. The objective is to derive a logical approximation that can be interpreted as a terminating forward-chaining logic program; this ensures that the approximation is finite and that, furthermore, an appropriate logic programming interpreter can implement the derived approximation. We are particularly interested in the specification of the operational semantics of programming languages in ordered logic, a technique we call substructural operational semantics (SSOS). We show that manifestly sound control flow and alias analyses can be derived as logical approximations of the substructural operational semantics of relevant languages.     

Logic Programs,Compatibility and Forward Chaining Construction

Logic programming under the stable model semantics is proposed as a non-monotonic language for knowledge representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence. In this paper, we explore and extend the notion of compatibility and the Λ operator, which were first proposed by Zhang to characterize default theories. First, we present a new characterization of stable models of a logic program and show that an extended notion of compatibility can characterize stable submodels. We further propose the notion of weak auto-compatibility which characterizes the Normal Forward Chaining Construction proposed by Marek, Nerode and Remmel. Previously, this construction was only known to construct the stable models of FC-normal logic programs, which turn out to be a proper subclass of weakly auto-compatible logic programs. We investigate the properties and complexity issues for weakly auto-compatible logic programs and compare them with some subclasses of logic programs.     

On the autoepistemic reconstruction of logic programming

Current semantics of logic programs normally ignore thesyntactical aspects of the programs. As a result, only the meanings ofsome well-behaved programs can be captured by these semantics. In this paper however, we propose a new semantics of logic programs that can reflectsome of the syntactical behaviours of the programs. The central notion of the semantics is the concept of aneutral clause p ← A which does not affect the behaviour of p in a program. The logic that underlies the semantics is based on anintensional extension of Levesque’s autoepistemicpredicate logic. It differs from existing autoepistemic logics in that it isquantificational andconstructive. We will also compare and contrast our semantics with some well-known semantics. In particular, we will show how to capture the undefined value of a logic program without resorting to a three-valued nonmonotonic formalism. This is achieved by translating an incoherent AE logic program to a program with multiple AE extensions whose intersection can then be used to characterize the undefined value of a logic program.     

Well-founded and stationary models of logic programs

We investigate the class ofstationary or partial stable models of normal logic programs. This important class of models includes all (total)stable models, and, moreover, thewell-founded model is always its smallest member. Stationary models have several natural fixed-point definitions and can be equivalently obtained as expansions or extensions of suitable autoepistemic or default theories. By taking a particular subclass of this class of models one can obtain different semantics of logic programs, including the stable semantics and the well-founded semantics. Stationary models can be also naturally extended to the class of all disjunctive logic programs. These features of stationary models designate them as an important class of models with applications reaching far beyond the realm of logic programming.Partially supported by the National Science Foundation grant #IRI-9313061.     

A new fixpoint semantics for general logic programs compared with the well-founded and the stable model semantics

We study a new fixpoint semantics for logic programs with negation. Our construction is intermediate between Van Gelder’s well-founded model and Gelfond and Lifschitz’s stable model semantics. We show first that the stable models of a logic programP are exactly the well-supported models ofP, i.e. the supported models with loop-free finite justifications. Then we associate to any logic programP a non-monotonic operator over the semilattice of justified interpretations, and we define in an abstract form its ordinal powers. We show that the fixpoints of this operator are the stable models ofP, and that its ordinal powers after some ordinala are extensions of the well-founded partial model ofP. In particular ifP has a well-founded model then that canonical model is also an ordinal power and the unique fixpoint of our operator. We show with examples of logic programs which have a unique stable model but no well-founded model that the converse is false. We relate also our work to Doyle’s truth maintenance system and some implementations of rule-based expert systems.     

Polynomial-time computable stable models

We study the relations between the expressive power of non-monotonic formalisms and polynomial-time computability in the framework of stable models semantics. While the problem of deciding whether a logic program has a total stable model isNP-complete, we introduce a polynomial-time algorithm that generates such a model for several important classes of programs, that are discussed in this paper. In the general case, the algorithm generates a (not necessarily total)p-stable model of the input program.This work was partially written while the first author was visiting at the UCLA Computer Science Department. The first author has been supported in part by the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche of Italy.     

Strong order equivalence

Recently, strong equivalence for Answer Set Programming has been studied intensively, and was shown to be beneficial for modular programming and automated optimization. In this paper we define the novel notion of strong order equivalence for logic programs with preferences (ordered logic programs). Based on this definition we give, for several semantics for preference handling, necessary and sufficient conditions for programs to be strongly order equivalent. These results allow us also to associate a so-called SOE structure to each ordered logic program, such that two ordered logic programs are strongly order equivalent if and only if their SOE structures coincide. We also present the relationships among the studied semantics with respect to strong order equivalence, which differs considerably from their relationships with respect to preferred answer sets. Furthermore, we study the computational complexity of several reasoning tasks associated to strong order equivalence. Finally, based on the obtained results, we present – for the first time – simplification methods for ordered logic programs.     

Consistency properties and set based logic programming

Blair et al. (2001) developed an extension of logic programming called set based logic programming. In the theory of set based logic programming the atoms represent subsets of a fixed universe X and one is allowed to compose the one-step consequence operator with a monotonic idempotent operator O so as to ensure that the analogue of stable models in the theory are always closed under O. Marek et al. (1992, Ann Pure Appl Logic 96:231–276 1999) developed a generalization of Reiter’s normal default theories that can be applied to both default theories and logic programs which is based on an underlying consistency property. In this paper, we show how to extend the normal logic programming paradigm of Marek, Nerode, and Remmel to set based logic programming. We also show how one can obtain a new semantics for set based logic programming based on a consistency property.     

Static semantics for normal and disjunctive logic programs

In this paper, we propose a newsemantic framework for disjunctive logic programming by introducingstatic expansions of disjunctive programs. The class of static expansions extends both the classes of stable, well-founded and stationary models of normal programs and the class of minimal models of positive disjunctive programs. Any static expansion of a programP provides the corresponding semantics forP consisting of the set of all sentences logically implied by the expansion. We show that among all static expansions of a disjunctive programP there is always theleast static expansion, which we call thestatic completion ¯P ofP. The static completion¯P can be defined as the least fixed point of a naturalminimal model operator and can be constructed by means of a simpleiterative procedure. The semantics defined by the static completion¯P is called thestatic semantics ofP. It coincides with the set of sentences that are true inall static expansions ofP. For normal programs, it coincides with the well-founded semantics. The class of static expansions represents a semantic framework which differs significantly from the other semantics proposed recently for disjunctive programs and databases. It is also defined for a much broader class of programs.Dedicated to Jack MinkerPartially supported by the National Science Foundation grant # IRI-9313061.     

An alternative approach to the semantics of disjunctive logic programs and deductive databases

In this paper, we study a new semantics of logic programming and deductive databases. Thepossible model semantics is introduced as a declarative semantics of disjunctive logic programs. The possible model semantics is an alternative theoretical framework to the classical minimal model semantics and provides a flexible inference mechanism for inferring negation in disjunctive logic programs. We also present a proof procedure for the possible model semantics and show that the possible model semantics has an advantage from the computational complexity point of view.This is a revised and extended version of the paper [36] which was presented at the Tenth International Conference on Logic Programming, Budapest, 21–25 June 1993.     

Optimal models of disjunctive logic programs: semantics, complexity, and computation

Almost all semantics for logic programs with negation identify a set, SEM(P), of models of program P, as the intended semantics of P, and any model M in this class is considered a possible meaning of P with regard to the semantics the user has in mind. Thus, for example, in the case of stable models [M. Gelfond et al., (1988)], choice models [D. Sacca et al., (1990)], answer sets [M. Gelfond et al., (1991)], etc., different possible models correspond to different ways of "completing" the incomplete information in the logic program. However, different end-users may have different ideas on which of these different models in SEM(P) is a reasonable one from their point of view. For instance, given SEM(P), user U/sub 1/ may prefer model M/sub 1//spl isin/SEM(P) to model M/sub 2//spl isin/SEM(P) based on some evaluation criterion that she has. We develop a logic program semantics based on optimal models. This semantics does not add yet another semantics to the logic programming arena - it takes as input an existing semantics SEM(P) and a user-specified objective function Obj, and yields a new semantics Opt(P)_/spl sube/ SEM(P) that realizes the objective function within the framework of preferred models identified already by SEM(P). Thus, the user who may or may not know anything about logic programming has considerable flexibility in making the system reflect her own objectives by building "on top" of existing semantics known to the system. In addition to the declarative semantics, we provide a complete complexity analysis and algorithms to compute optimal models under varied conditions when SEM(P) is the stable model semantics, the minimal models semantics, and the all-models semantics.     

On the computational cost of disjunctive logic programming: Propositional case

This paper addresses complexity issues for important problems arising with disjunctive logic programming. In particular, the complexity of deciding whether a disjunctive logic program is consistent is investigated for a variety of well-known semantics, as well as the complexity of deciding whether a propositional formula is satisfied by all models according to a given semantics. We concentrate on finite propositional disjunctive programs with as well as without integrity constraints, i.e., clauses with empty heads; the problems are located in appropriate slots of the polynomial hierarchy. In particular, we show that the consistency check is ₂ ^p -complete for the disjunctive stable model semantics (in the total as well as partial version), the iterated closed world assumption, and the perfect model semantics, and we show that the inference problem for these semantics is ₂ ^p -complete; analogous results are derived for the answer sets semantics of extended disjunctive logic programs. Besides, we generalize previously derived complexity results for the generalized closed world assumption and other more sophisticated variants of the closed world assumption. Furthermore, we use the close ties between the logic programming framework and other nonmonotonic formalisms to provide new complexity results for disjunctive default theories and disjunctive autoepistemic literal theories.Parts of the results in this paper appeared in form of an abstract in the Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM SIGACT SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS-93), pp. 158–167. Other parts appeared in shortened form in the Proceedings of the International Logic Programming Symposium, Vancouver, October 1993 (ILPS-93), pp. 266–278. MIT Press.     

Extremal problems in logic programming and stable model computation

We study the following problem: given a class of logic programs ¢, determine the maximum number of stable models of a program from ©. We establish the maximum for the class of all logic programs with at most n clauses, and for the class of all logic programs of size at most n. We also characterize the programs for which the maxima are attained. We obtained similar results for the class of all disjunctive logic programs with at most n clauses, each of length at most m, and for the class of all disjunctive logic programs of size at most n. Our results on logic programs have direct implication for the design of algorithms to compute stable models. Several such algorithms, similar in spirit to the Davis-Putnam procedure, are described in the paper. Our results imply that there is an algorithm that finds all stable models of a program with n clauses after considering the search space of size O(3^n/3) in the worst case. Our results also provide some insights into the question of representability of families of sets as families of stable models of logic programs.