Micro‐ and macrophase separation of thermosetting systems modified with epoxidized styrene‐block‐butadiene‐ block‐styrene linear triblock copolymers and their influence on final mechanical properties

BACKGROUND: The goal of this work was to establish the minimum degree of epoxidation needed to develop nanostructured epoxy systems by modification with poly(styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene) (SBS) triblock copolymers epoxidized to several degrees, and also to investigate the effect of polystyrene (PS) content on the final morphologies. By using two SBS copolymers, the influence of the weight ratio of the two blocks on the generated morphologies and mechanical properties was also analysed. RESULTS: Nanostructured thermosets were effectively obtained through reaction‐induced microphase separation of PS blocks from the matrix. A minimum of 27 mol% of epoxidation, which corresponds to 4.8 wt% of epoxidized polybutadiene (PB) units in the overall mixture, was needed to ensure nanostructuring of final mixtures and thus their transparency. Hexagonally ordered nanostructures were achieved for PS contents of around 16–20 wt%, which agrees with our previous results for mixtures with other SBS copolymers with different ratios between blocks. The fracture toughness of the epoxy matrix was improved or at least retained with mixing. CONCLUSION: The degree of epoxidation of PB blocks needed to switch epoxy/SBS mixtures from a macrophase‐separated to a nanostructured state has been established. The generated morphologies in the epoxy systems are mainly dependent on the PS content in the mixture. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Polymorphism and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/ poly(ϵ‐caprolactone)–block–poly(dimethylsiloxane)–block–poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) blends

The miscibility, crystallization kinetics and crystalline morphology of a new system of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(?‐caprolactone)‐block‐poly(dimethylsiloxane)‐block‐poly(?‐caprolactone) (PVDF/PCL‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PCL) triblock copolymer were investigated by a variety of techniques. The miscibility and phase behaviour of PVDF/PCL‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PCL were studied by determination of the melting point temperature, crystallization kinetics and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) mapping. Chemical imaging was used as a new technique to characterize the interaction of polymer blends in crystalline morphology. The results demonstrate the existence of characteristic peaks of both PVDF and PCL in the chosen crystalline area. The crystalline structures of PVDF were affected by the PCL‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PCL triblock copolymer and facilitate the formation of the β polymorph which was illustrated by FTIR analysis. The β crystal phase fraction increases significantly on increasing the composition of the PCL‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PCL triblock copolymer. In addition, confined crystallization of PCL within PVDF inter‐lamellar and/or inter‐fibrillar regions was confirmed through polarizing optical microscopy, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and small‐angle X‐ray scattering analysis. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Amphiphilic block copolymer poly(lactic acid)‐block‐(glycidylazide polymer)‐block‐polystyrene: synthesis and self‐assembly

The triblock energetic copolymer poly(lactic acid)‐block‐(glycidylazide polymer)‐block‐polystyrene (PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS) was synthesized successfully through atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of styrene and ring‐opening polymerization of d,l ‐lactide. The energetic macroinitiator GAP‐Br, which was made from reacting equimolar GAP with α‐bromoisobutyryl bromide, firstly triggered the ATRP of styrene with its bromide group, and then the hydroxyl group on the GAP end of the resulting diblock copolymer participated in the polymerization of lactide in the presence of stannous octoate. The triblock copolymer PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS had a narrow distribution of molecular weight. In the copolymer, the PS block was solvophilic in toluene and improved the stability of the structure, the PLA block was solvophobic in toluene and served as the sacrificial component for the preparation of porous materials, and GAP was the basic and energetic material. The three blocks of the copolymer were fundamentally thermodynamically immiscible, which led to the self‐assembly of the block copolymer in solution. Further studies showed that the concentration and solubility of the copolymer and the polarity of the solvent affected the morphology and size of the micelles generated from the self‐assembly of PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS. The micelles generated in organic solvents at 10 mg mL^?1 copolymer concentration were spherical but became irregular when water was used as a co‐solvent. The spherical micelles self‐assembled in toluene had three distinct layers, with the diameter of the micelles increasing from 60 to 250 nm as the concentration of the copolymer increased from 5 to 15 mg L^?1. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Nanostructured thermosets from self‐assembled amphiphilic block copolymer/epoxy resin mixtures: effect of copolymer content on nanostructures

Nanostructure formation in thermosets can allow the design of materials with interesting properties. The aim of this work was to obtain a nanostructured epoxy system by self‐assembly of an amphiphilic diblock copolymer in an unreacted epoxy/amine mixture followed by curing of the matrix. The copolymer employed was polystyrene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS‐b‐PMMA). The thermoset system, formed by a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A‐type epoxy resin and diaminodiphenylmethane hardener, was chosen to ensure the miscibility of most of the PMMA block until matrix gelation. Transparent materials with microphase‐separated domains were obtained for copolymer contents lower than 40 wt%. In systems containing 20 and 30 wt% block copolymer, the PS block formed spherical micelles or worm‐like structures before curing, which were stabilized through curing by the more compatible PMMA block phase. Nanostructured thermoset systems were successfully synthesized for self‐assembled amphiphilic block copolymer–epoxy/amine mixtures for copolymer contents lower than 40 wt%. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

AB‐ and ABC‐type di‐ and triblock copolymers of poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)] and poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)‐block‐lactide]: synthesis,characterization and thermal studies

Polystyrene terminated with benzyl alcohol units was employed as a macroinitiator for ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L ‐lactide to yield AB‐ and ABC‐type block copolymers. Even though there are many reports on the diblock copolymers of poly(styrene‐block‐lactide) and poly(styrene‐block‐lactone), this is the first report on the poly(styrene‐block‐lactone‐block‐lactide) triblock copolymer consisting of two semicrystalline and degradable segments. The triblock copolymers exhibited twin melting behavior in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis with thermal transitions corresponding to each of the lactone and lactide blocks. The block derived from ε‐caprolactone also showed crystallization transitions upon cooling from the melt. In the DSC analysis, one of the triblock copolymers showed an exothermic transition well above the melting temperature upon cooling. Thermogravimetric analysis of these block copolymers showed a two‐step degradation curve for the diblock copolymer and a three‐step degradation for the triblock copolymer with each of the degradation steps associated with each segment of the block copolymers. The present study shows that it is possible to make pure triblock copolymers with two semicrystalline segments which also consist of degradable blocks. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology and thermomechanical properties of epoxy thermosets modified with polysulfone‐block‐polydimethylsiloxane multiblock copolymer

Polysulfone‐block‐polydimethylsiloxane (PSF‐b‐PDMS) multiblock copolymer was synthesized via the Mannich polycondensation between phenolic hydroxyl‐terminated polysulfone and aminopropyl‐terminated polydimethylsiloxane in the presence of formaldehyde. The multiblock copolymer was characterized by means of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and used as a modifier to improve the thermomechanical properties of epoxy thermosets. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that the epoxy thermosets containing PSF‐b‐PDMS multiblock copolymer possesses the microphase‐separated morphological structures. Depending on the content of the PSF‐b‐PDMS multiblock copolymer, the spherical particles with the size of 50–200 nm in diameter were dispersed into the continuous epoxy matrices. The measurement of static contact angles showed that with the inclusion of PSF‐b‐PDMS multiblock copolymer, the epoxy thermosets displayed the improved surface hydrophobicity. It is noted that the epoxy resin was significantly toughened in terms of the measurement of critical stress field intensity factor (K_1C). © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Synthesis,characterization and biocompatibility of novel biodegradable poly[((R)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate)‐block‐(D,L‐lactide)‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)] triblock copolymers

BACKGROUND: Biodegradable block copolymers have attracted particular attention in both fundamental and applied research because of their unique chain architecture, biodegradability and biocompatibility. Hence, biodegradable poly[((R )‐3 ‐hydroxybutyrate)‐block‐(D ,L ‐lactide)‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)] (PHB‐PLA‐PCL) triblock copolymers were synthesized, characterized and evaluated for their biocompatibility. RESULTS: The results from nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography and thermogravimetric analysis showed that the novel triblock copolymers were successfully synthesized. Differential scanning calorimetry and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction showed that the crystallinity of PHB in the copolymers decreased compared with methyl‐PHB (LMPHB) oligomer precursor. Blood compatibility experiments showed that the blood coagulation time became longer accompanied by a reduced number of platelets adhering to films of the copolymers with decreasing PHB content in the triblocks. Murine osteoblast MC3T3‐E1 cells cultured on the triblock copolymer films spread and proliferated significantly better compared with their growth on homopolymers of PHB, PLA and PCL, respectively. CONCLUSION: For the first time, PHB‐PLA‐PCL triblock copolymers were synthesized using low molecular weight LMPHB oligomer as the macroinitiator through ring‐opening polymerization with D ,L ‐lactide and ε‐caprolactone. The triblock copolymers exhibited flexible properties with good biocompatibility; they could be developed into promising biomedical materials for in vivo applications. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Self-organized thermosets involving epoxy and poly(?-caprolactone)-block-poly(ethylene-co-ethylethylene)-block-poly(?-caprolactone) amphiphilic triblock copolymer

In this work, we investigated the self-assembly behavior of poly(?-caprolactone)-block-poly(ethylene-co-ethylethylene)-block-poly(?-caprolactone) (PCL-b-PEEE-b-PCL) triblock copolymer in epoxy thermosets. The PCL-b-PEEE-b-PCL triblock copolymer was synthesized via the ring-opening polymerization of ?-caprolactone with a hydroxyl-terminated poly(ethylene-co-ethylethylene) as the macromolecular initiator. The hydroxyl-terminated poly(ethylene-co-ethylethylene) was prepared with the hydrogenation reaction of a hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene. The triblock copolymer was incorporated into the precursors of epoxy to obtain the nanostructured thermosets. It was found that the self-organized nanophases were formed in the mixture before curing reaction and the nanostructures can be further fixed via curing reaction. The self-assembly behavior of the triblock copolymer in epoxy thermosets was investigated by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) shows that the formation of the self-organized nanophase in the thermosets caused that a part of poly(?-caprolactone) subchains were demixed from epoxy matrix with the occurrence of curing reaction; the fractions of demixed PCL blocks were estimated according to the T_g-composition relation of the model binary blends of epoxy and PCL.     

Morphology of poly(styrene‐block‐dimethylsiloxane) copolymer films

The morphologies of poly(styrene‐block‐di‐methylsiloxane) (PS‐b‐PDMS) copolymer thin films were analyzed via atomic force microscopy and transition electron microscopy (TEM). The asymmetric copolymer thin films spin‐cast from toluene onto mica presented meshlike structures, which were different from the spherical structures from TEM measurements. The annealing temperature affected the surface morphology of the PS‐b‐PDMS copolymer thin films; the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) phases at the surface were increased when the annealing temperature was higher than the PDMS glass‐transition temperature. The morphologies of the PS‐b‐PDMS copolymer thin films were different from solvent to solvent; for thin films spin‐cast from toluene, the polystyrene (PS) phase appeared as pits in the PDMS matrix, whereas the thin films spin‐cast from cyclohexane solutions exhibited an islandlike structure and small, separated PS phases as protrusions over the macroscopically flat surface. The microphase structure of the PS‐b‐PDMS copolymer thin films was also strongly influenced by the different substrates; for an asymmetric block copolymer thin film, the PDMS and PS phases on a silicon substrate presented a lamellar structure parallel to the surface at intervals. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 1010–1018, 2007     

Cure kinetics and thermal stability of micro and nanostructured thermosetting blends of epoxy resin and epoxidized styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene triblock copolymer systems

The compatibility of styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene (SBS) triblockcopolymer in epoxy resin is increased by the epoxidation of butadiene segment, using hydrogen peroxide in the presence of an in situ prepared catalyst in water/dichloroethane biphasic system. Highly epoxidized SBS (epoxy content SBS >26 mol%) give rise to nanostructured blends with epoxy resin. The cure kinetics of micro and nanostructured blends of epoxy resin [diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A; (DGEBA)]/amine curing agent [4,4′‐diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM)] with epoxidized styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene (eSBS 47 mol%) triblock copolymer has been studied for the first time using differential scanning calorimetry under isothermal conditions to determine the reaction kinetic parameters such as kinetic constants and activation energy. The cure reaction rate is decreased with increasing the concentration of eSBS in the blends and also with the lowering of cure temperature. The compatibility of eSBS in epoxy resin is investigated in detailed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, optical and transmition electron microscopic analysis. The experimental data of the cure behavior for the systems, epoxy/DDM and epoxy/eSBS(47 mol%)/DDM show an autocatalytic behavior regardless of the presence of eSBS in agreement with Kamal's model. The thermal stability of cured resins is also evaluated using thermogravimetry in nitrogen atmosphere. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Flexible and flame‐retardant S‐SEB‐S triblock copolymer/PPE nano‐alloy

We observed that modified polyphenylene ether (PPE) was solubilized in thermoplastic styrenic elastomer (TPS) and that a two‐phase lacy structure formed on nanometer scales when the TPS composition was 67 wt % and modified PPE and polystyrene‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (S‐SEB‐S triblock copolymer) were blended. However, the molecular weight of the outer PS block segments M_outPS and the content of the outer PS block segments ?_outPS were <10,000 g/mol and 20 wt %, respectively. The resulting S‐SEB‐S/modified PPE nano‐alloy exhibited both flexibility and flame retardancy, unlike other materials, where a trade‐off exists between these two properties; that is, the flame retardancy was excellent when the phosphorus additive was present. This combination of properties might be attributed to the two‐phase nanometer‐scale structure consisting of flame‐retardant styrene/PPE domains and a continuous soft, lacy SEB matrix. The results for polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (S‐EB‐S triblock copolymer)/modified PPE blends were presented for comparison. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40446.     

Nanostructures and thermomechanical properties of epoxy thermosets containing reactive diblock copolymer

Polystyrene‐block‐poly(glycidyl methacrylate) reactive diblock copolymer (PS‐b‐PGMA) was synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The diblock copolymer was characterized using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The cured epoxy thermosets with 10–20 nm PS particles were prepared by blending the diblock copolymer with epoxy resin. The nanostructures were examined by means of transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) and small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). The formation of the nanostructures was caused by the reaction‐induced microphase separation mechanism. It is significant that the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of these epoxy thermosets were increased by the addition of PS‐b‐PGMA reactive block copolymer as revealed by both differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Nanostructured polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐polybutadiene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers modified with polystyrene and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) homopolymers

Morphologies of polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐ polybutadiene‐b ‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (SBM) triblock copolymer were predicted, adopting the phase diagram proposed by Stadler and co‐workers for neat SBM block copolymer, and were experimentally proved using atomic force microscopy. All investigated polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymer modified with polystyrene (PS) and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) homopolymers showed the expected nanostructures. For polymer blends of symmetric SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with PS homopolymer, the cylinders in cylinders core?shell morphology and the perforated lamellae morphology were obtained. Moreover, modifying the same SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with both PS and PMMA homopolymers the cylinders at cylinders morphology was reached. The predictions for morphologies of blends based on asymmetric SBM‐2 triblock copolymer were also confirmed experimentally, visualizing a spheres over spheres structure. This work presents an easy way of using PS and/or PMMA homopolymers for preparing nanostructured polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymers with desired morphologies, similar to those of neat SBM block copolymers. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Blending of styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene copolymer with sulfonated vinyl aromatic polymers

Different polymers containing sulfonic groups attached to the phenyl rings were prepared by sulfonation of polystyrene (PS) and styrene‐block‐(ethylene‐co‐1‐butene)‐block‐styrene (SEBS). The sulfonation degree (SD) was varied between 1 and 20 mol% of the styrene units. Polyphase materials containing sulfonated units were prepared by blending styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene (SBS), with both sulfonated PS and sulfonated SEBS in a Brabender mixer. Such a procedure was performed as an alternative route to direct sulfonation of SBS which is actually not selective towards benzene rings because of the great reactivity of the double bonds in polybutadiene (PB) blocks to sulfonation agents. Thermal and dynamic‐mechanic analysis, together with morphology characterization of the blends, is consistent with obtaining partially compatible blends characterized by higher T_g of the polystyrene domains and improved thermal stability. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐b‐poly(ethylene glycol)‐b‐poly(ε‐caprolactone) triblock copolymers with dibutylmagnesium as catalyst

Two series of poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐b‐poly(ethylene glycol)‐b‐poly(ε‐caprolactone) triblock copolymers were prepared by the ring opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone in the presence of poly(ethylene glycol) and dibutylmagnesium in 1,4‐dioxane solution at 70°C. The triblock structure and molecular weight of the copolymers were analyzed and confirmed by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, FTIR, and gel permeation chromatography. The crystallization and thermal properties of the copolymers were investigated by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results illustrated that the crystallization and melting behaviors of the copolymers were depended on the copolymer composition and the relative length of each block in copolymers. Crystallization exothermal peaks (T_c) and melting endothermic peaks (T_m) of PEG block were significantly influenced by the relative length of PCL blocks, due to the hindrance of the lateral PCL blocks. With increasing of the length of PCL blocks, the diffraction and the melting peak of PEG block disappeared gradually in the WAXD patterns and DSC curves, respectively. In contrast, the crystallization of PCL blocks was not suppressed by the middle PEG block. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Synthesis of poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐polystyrene and poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐[polystyrene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)] through atom transfer radical polymerization

A new graft copolymers poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐polystyrene (PSF‐g‐PS) and poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐[polystyrene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)] (PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA)) were successfully prepared via atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) catalyzed by FeCl₂/isophthalic acid in N,N‐dimethyl formamide. The products were characterized by GPC, DSC, IR, TGA and NMR. The characterization data indicated that the graft copolymerization was accomplished via conventional ATRP mechanism. The effect of chloride content of the macroinitiator on the graft copolymerization was investigated. Only one glass transition temperature (T_g) was detected by DSC for the graft copolymer PSF‐g‐PS and two glass transition temperatures were observed in the DSC curve of PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA). The presence of PSF in PSF‐b‐PS or PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA) was found to improve thermal stabilities. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Surface microphase separation in PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films

Well‐defined poly(dimethylsiloxane)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(2,2,3,3,4,4,4‐heptafluorobutyl methacrylate) (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA) triblock copolymers were synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Surface microphase separation in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films was investigated. The microstructure of the block copolymers was investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Surface composition was studied by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The chemical composition at the surface was determined by the surface microphase separation in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films. The increase of the PHFBMA content could strengthen the microphase separation behavior in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films and reduce their surface tension. Comparison between the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymers and the PDMS‐b‐PHFBMA diblock copolymers showed that the introduction of the PMMA segments promote the fluorine segregation onto the surface and decrease the fluorine content in the copolymers with low surface energy. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Crystallization behavior of “wet brush” and “dry brush” blends of PS‐b‐PEO‐b‐PS/h‐PEO

The crystallization behavior of the blending system consists of homopolymer poly(ethylene oxide) (h‐PEO) with different molecular weights, and polystyrene‐block‐poly (ethylene oxide)‐block‐polystyrene (PS‐b‐PEO‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer has been investigated by DSC measurements. The crystallization of PEO block (b‐PEO) in block copolymer occurs under much lower temperature than that of the h‐PEO in the bulk (ΔT > 65 °C), which is attributed to the homogeneous nucleation crystallization behavior of the b‐PEO microdomains. In both the “dry‐brush” and the “wet brush” blending systems, the homogeneous nucleation crystallization temperature of PS‐b‐PEO‐b‐PS/h‐PEO blends increases due to the increase of the domain size. The heterogeneous nucleation crystallization temperatures of h‐PEO in the wet brush blending systems are higher than that of the corresponding h‐PEO in the bulk. At the same time, the heterogeneous nucleation crystallization temperature of b‐PEO10000 decreases from 43°C to 30°C and 40°C in the h‐PEO600 and h‐PEO2000 blending systems, respectively, because of the stretching of the PEO chains in the wet brush. However, this kind of phenomenon does not happen in the dry brush blending systems. The self‐seeding procedure was used to further ascertain the nucleation mechanism in the crystallization process. As a result, the self‐seeding domains have been confirmed, and the difference between the dry brush and wet brush systems has been observed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

The role of the ratio (PEG:PPG) of a triblock copolymer (PPG‐b‐PEG‐b‐PPG) in the cure kinetics,miscibility and thermal and mechanical properties in an epoxy matrix

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of different poly(ethylene glycol):poly(propylene glycol) (PEG:PPG) molar ratios in a triblock copolymer in the cure kinetics, miscibility and thermal and mechanical properties in an epoxy matrix. The poly(propylene glycol)‐block‐poly(ethylene glycol)‐block‐poly(propylene glycol) (PPG‐b‐PEG‐b‐PPG) triblock copolymers used had two different molecular masses: 3300 and 2000 g mol^?1. The mass concentration of PEG in the copolymer structure played a key role in the miscibility and cure kinetics of the blend as well as in the thermal–mechanical properties. Phase separation was observed only for blends formed with the 3300 g mol^?1 triblock copolymer at 20 wt%. Concerning thermal properties, the miscibility of the copolymer in the epoxy matrix reduced the T_g value by 13 °C, although a 62% increase in fracture toughness (K_IC) was observed. After the addition of PPG‐b‐PEG‐b‐PPG with 3300 g mol^?1 there was a reduction in the modulus of elasticity by 8% compared to the neat matrix; no significant changes were observed in T_g values for the immiscible system. The use of PPG‐b‐PEG‐b‐PPG with 2000 g mol^?1 reduced the modulus of elasticity by approximately 47% and increased toughness (K_IC) up to 43%. Finally, for the curing kinetics of all materials, the incorporation of the triblock copolymer PPG‐b‐PEG‐b‐PPG delayed the cure reaction of the DGEBA/DDM (DGEBA, diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A; DDM, Q3‐4,4′‐Diaminodiphenylmethane) system when there is miscibility and accelerated the cure reaction when it is immiscible. All experimental curing reactions could be fitted to the Kamal autocatalytic model presenting an excellent agreement with experimental data. This model was able to capture some interesting features of the addition of triblock copolymers in an epoxy resin. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry