Comparative environmental impact assessment of various fuels and solar heat for a combined cycle

In the present study, a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) for evaluation of the environmental impacts of different fuels to generate electricity through a combined cycle is carried out. For this purpose, various heat sources including solar thermal, lignite, natural gas, oil, and hydrogen are investigated with LCA methods. The methods considered for the study include CML 2001 and ReCiPe Endpoint. The results of the present LCA study for both methods show that the hydrogen is the best fuel option according to the environmental impacts. The impact categories obtained from CML 2001 are the depletion of abiotic resources, eutrophication, global warming, marine sediment, and aquatic ecotoxicity, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity and the competition of land. Furthermore, the human health, ecosystems and resource availability are investigated with the ReCiPe Endpoint method. The greenhouse gas emissions per kWh electricity generation are 0.19 kg CO₂ eq for solar, 1.21 kg CO₂ eq for lignite, 0.53 kg CO₂ eq for natural gas, 1.11 kg CO₂ eq for oil and 0.04 kg CO₂ eq for hydrogen according to the CML 2001 method.     

LCA of domestic and centralized biomass combustion: The case of Lombardy (Italy)

This paper analyzes and compares the environmental impacts of biomass combustion in small appliances such as domestic open fireplaces and stoves, and in two types of centralized combined heat and power plants, feeding district heating networks. The analysis is carried out following a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach. The expected savings of GHG (greenhouse gases) emissions due to the substitution of fossil fuels with biomass are quantified, as well as emissions of toxic pollutants and substances responsible for acidification and ozone formation.The LCA results show net savings of GHG emissions when using biomass instead of conventional fuels, varying from 0.08 to 1.08 t of CO₂ eq. per t of dry biomass in the different scenarios. Avoided GHG emissions thanks to biomass combustion in Lombardy are 1.32 Mt year^?1(1.5% of total regional GHG emissions). For the other impact categories, the use of biomass in district heating systems can again cause a consistent reduction of impacts, whereas biomass combustion in residential devices shows higher impacts than fossil fuels with a particular concern for PAH, VOC and particulate matter emissions. For example, in Lombardy, PM10 emissions from domestic devices are about 8100 t year^?1, corresponding to almost one third of the total particulate emissions in 2005.     

Environmental impacts of a standalone solar water splitting system for sustainable hydrogen production: A life cycle assessment

Hydrogen is broadly utilized in various industries. It can also be considered as a future clean energy carrier. Currently, hydrogen is mainly produced from typical fuels such as coal; however, there exist some other clean alternatives which use water decomposition techniques. Water splitting via the copper-chlorine (Cu–Cl) thermochemical cycle is a superb option for producing clean carbon-free fuel. Here, the life cycle assessment (LCA) technique is used to investigate the environmental consequences of an integrated solar Cu–Cl fuel production facility for large-scale hydrogen production. The impact of varying important input parameters including irradiation level, plant lifetime, and solar-to-hydrogen efficiency on various environmental impacts are investigated next. For instance, an improve in the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency from 15% to 30%, results in a reduction in the GWP from 1.25 to 6.27E-01 kg CO₂ eq. An uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to deal with the study uncertainties. The results of the LCA show that the potential of acidification and global warming potential (GWP) of the current system are 8.27E-03 kg SO₂ eq. and 0.91 kg CO₂ eq./kg H₂, respectively. According to the sensitivity analysis, the plant lifetime has the highest effect on the total GWP of the plant with a range of 0.63–1.88 kg of CO₂ eq./kg H₂. Results comparison with past thermochemical-based studies shows that the GWP of the current integrated system is 7% smaller than that of a solar sulfur-iodine thermochemical cycle.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen-based electricity generation in place of conventional fuels for residential buildings

In the current study, environmental impact evaluation of electricity generation from hydrogen instead of conventional fuels is investigated with a life cycle impact assessment for residential usage. For this purpose, lignite, natural gas, and hydrogen are utilized to a power plant to generate electricity in Istanbul, Turkey throughout the year. The utilized method for life cycle analysis is the CML 2001 which considers the impacts of global warming, acidification, abiotic fossil depletion, photochemical ozone creation, ionising radiation, human toxicity potential, land use, eutrophication potential, ozone layer depletion, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, ecotoxicity of marine aquatic, ecotoxicity of marine sediment, and terrestrial ecotoxicity. The results of the present study illustrate that the generation with hydrogen is the best option for the environment in terms of all impact category. The global warming potentials with the 500 years time horizon for each option of electricity generation are found as 1.4 × 10⁶ ton CO₂ eq, 6 × 10⁵ ton CO₂ eq and 4.6 × 10⁴ ton CO₂ eq, respectively in the month of January.     

Energy crops in Ireland: Quantifying the potential life-cycle greenhouse gas reductions of energy-crop electricity

This study uses life-cycle assessment (LCA) to compare greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dominant agricultural land uses, and peat and coal electricity generation, with fuel-chains for Miscanthus and short-rotation-coppice willow (SRCW) electricity. A simple scenario was used as an example, where 30% of peat and 10% of coal electricity generation was substituted with co-fired Miscanthus and SRCW, respectively. Miscanthus and SRCW cultivation were assumed to replace sugar-beet, dairy, beef-cattle and sheep systems. GHG emissions of 1938 and 1346 kg CO₂ eq. ha⁻¹ a⁻¹ for Miscanthus and SRCW cultivation compared with between 3494 CO₂ eq. ha⁻¹ a⁻¹ for sugar-beet cultivation and 12,068 CO₂ eq. ha⁻¹ a⁻¹ for dairy systems. Miscanthus and SRCW fuel chains emitted 0.131 and 0.132 kg CO₂ eq. kWh⁻¹ electricity exported, respectively, compared with 1.150 and 0.990 kg CO₂ eq. kWh⁻¹ electricity exported for peat and coal fuel chains. 1.48 Mt CO₂ eq. a⁻¹ was saved from electricity production, and 0.42 Mt CO₂ eq. a⁻¹ was saved from displaced agriculture and soil C-sequestration. The total reduction of 1.9 Mt CO₂ eq. a⁻¹ represents 2.8% of Ireland's 2004 GHG emissions, but was calculated to require just 1.7% of agricultural land area and displace just 1.2% of the dairy herd (based on conservative Miscanthus and SRCW combustible-yield estimates of 11.7 and 8.81 t ha⁻¹ a⁻¹ dry matter, respectively). A 50% increase in cultivation emissions would still result in electricity being produced with an emission burden over 80% lower than peat and coal electricity. Lower yield assumptions had little impact on total GHG reductions for the scenario, but required substantially greater areas of land. It was concluded that energy-crop utilisation would be an efficient GHG reduction strategy for Ireland.     

Life cycle assessment of a renewable energy system with hydrogen-battery storage for a remote off-grid community

Remote areas usually do not have access to electricity from the national grid. The energy demand is often covered by diesel generators, resulting in high operating costs and significant environmental impacts. With reference to the case study of Ginostra (a village on a small island in the south of Italy), this paper analyses the environmental sustainability of an innovative solution based on Renewable Energy Sources (RES) integrated with a hybrid hydrogen-battery energy storage system. A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been carried out to evaluate if and to what extent the RES-based system could bring environmental improvements compared to the current diesel-based configuration. The results show that the impact of the RES-based system is less than 10% of that of the current diesel-based solution for almost all impact categories (climate change, ozone depletion, photochemical ozone formation, acidification, marine and terrestrial eutrophication and fossil resource use). The renewable solution has slightly higher values only for the following indicators: use of mineral and metal resources, water use and freshwater eutrophication. The climate change category accounts for 0.197 kg CO₂ eq./kWh in the renewable scenario and 1.73 kg CO₂ eq./kWh in the diesel-based scenario, which corresponds to a reduction in GHG emissions of 89%. By shifting to the RES-based solution, about 6570 t of CO₂ equivalent can be saved in 25 years (lifetime of the plant). In conclusion, the hydrogen-battery system could provide a sustainable and reliable alternative for power supply in remote areas.     

Effects of nuclear power plant shutdowns on electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions after the Tohoku Earthquake

This study analyzes how the substitution of fossil fuels for nuclear power due to the shutdown of nuclear power plants after the Tohoku Earthquake affects electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in Japan. Results indicate that Japan generated 4.3 million metric tons (or 0.3%, with a 95% confidence interval) of additional CO₂ emissions in 2011 following the earthquake. The increase in CO₂ emissions stemmed from the combined effects of decreased electricity consumption due to energy conservation efforts and the substitution of fossil fuels for nuclear power following the Tohoku Earthquake. Results also show considerable spatial variation in the impacts of the earthquake on net CO₂ emissions. A majority of the prefectures (40 of 47 prefectures, or 85%) were predicted to experience higher CO₂ emissions after the Tohoku Earthquake while the remaining (7 prefectures) were predicted to experience lower CO₂ emissions. Our findings suggest that Japan and countries under similar risks may want to reformulate energy policy by emphasizing utilization of diverse power and energy sources, including more renewable energy production and electricity conservation. The policy reform should also consider spatial variation in the combined effects of reduced reliance on nuclear power and increased CO₂ conversion factors.     

Reducing life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn ethanol by integrating biomass to produce heat and power at ethanol plants

A life-cycle assessment (LCA) of corn ethanol was conducted to determine the reduction in the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for corn ethanol compared to gasoline by integrating biomass fuels to replace fossil fuels (natural gas and grid electricity) in a U.S. Midwest dry-grind corn ethanol plant producing 0.19 hm³ y⁻¹ of denatured ethanol. The biomass fuels studied are corn stover and ethanol co-products [dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS), and syrup (solubles portion of DDGS)]. The biomass conversion technologies/systems considered are process heat (PH) only systems, combined heat and power (CHP) systems, and biomass integrated gasification combined cycle (BIGCC) systems. The life-cycle GHG emission reduction for corn ethanol compared to gasoline is 38.9% for PH with natural gas, 57.7% for PH with corn stover, 79.1% for CHP with corn stover, 78.2% for IGCC with natural gas, 119.0% for BIGCC with corn stover, and 111.4% for BIGCC with syrup and stover. These GHG emission estimates do not include indirect land use change effects. GHG emission reductions for CHP, IGCC, and BIGCC include power sent to the grid which replaces electricity from coal. BIGCC results in greater reductions in GHG emissions than IGCC with natural gas because biomass is substituted for fossil fuels. In addition, underground sequestration of CO₂ gas from the ethanol plant’s fermentation tank could further reduce the life-cycle GHG emission for corn ethanol by 32% compared to gasoline.     

Environmental and energy efficiency assessments of offshore hydrogen supply chains utilizing compressed gaseous hydrogen,liquefied hydrogen,liquid organic hydrogen carriers and ammonia

Hydrogen has emerged as an eco-friendly energy to replace fossil fuels. But, it is difficult to store large capacity and to transport long distance due to a low volumetric energy density. In order to overcome the disadvantages of hydrogen, hydrogen supply chains are being widely studied and reported to compare which chains are better to be deployed. However, few studies have reported in terms of an environmental impact assessment. Therefore, in this study, an environmental impact is analyzed using a life cycle assessment (LCA) for offshore hydrogen supply chains linked to offshore wind farms, as well as an energy efficiency. The hydrogen supply chains include all stages of converting hydrogen produced on an offshore platform into compressed gaseous hydrogen (CGH₂), liquefied hydrogen (LH₂), liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHC), or ammonia (NH₃), transporting them to an onshore plant and storing as CGH₂. In particular, in order to calculate the amount of fuel consumed in ship transportation, the weight of cargo is estimated accordingly. The results vary depending on the electrical energy sources used and the transport distance. In almost all stages except for transport, electrical energy sources have a significant impact on the environmental load. The global warming potential (GWP), which is an alternate value of greenhouse gas emissions, is in the range of 1.15–10.11 kg CO₂ eq when the national electricity grid and the offshore wind power (W + G) are used together. On the other hand, it shows a much lower value as 1.15–2.05 kg CO₂ eq when using only offshore wind power (W). As the transport distance increased, it is significantly affected in some impact categories, i.e. GWP, acidification potential (AP), and eutrophication potential (EP). The contribution of transport gradually increased, and at 10,000 km, the value was 25.32–35.42 kg CO₂ eq for W + G and 24.88–27.49 kg CO₂ eq for W. Comparing the efficiency, CGH₂ is the highest at all transport distances, followed by NH₃, LOHC, and LH₂. Considering that CGH₂ is typically unfeasible for ship transport, hydrogen transport using NH₃ can be the most attractive option. Finally, it is found that the longer the transport distance, the greater the effect on chain efficiency. Accordingly, the efficiency of the chains sharply decreases as the transport distance increases.     

Applying resource efficiency principles to the analysis of EU-27 bioenergy options by 2020 – Findings from a recent study for the European Environment Agency

The Renewable Energy Directive sets a target for the European Union (EU) to consume 20% of its final energy from renewable sources by 2020 and further targets are under discussion. EU renewable energy targets will lead to a substantial increase in the demand for bioenergy. As for other sectors, it is important, therefore, to apply the principles of the EU Resource efficiency roadmap to bioenergy production: producing more output with less material input and minimising adverse environmental impacts during the entire production life cycle. This paper uses that concept to analyse the most resource efficient ways for reaching the 2020 bioenergy targets (as set out in National Renewable Energy Action Plans).Scenario analysis with three different storylines is used to model environmental and land use implications plus total bioenergy potential and GHG reductions in 2020 from the agricultural, forest, and waste sectors. These storylines vary in environmental ambition level and economic and political assumptions and explore plausible bioenergy development paths. They show substantial variance in terms of environmental impact and the GHG efficiency between different bioenergy pathways.The modelling shows that under Storyline 1 bioenergy targets of the National Renewable Energy Action Plans would be achieved with CO₂ eq emissions of 44 kg GJ⁻¹, i.e. 62% less GHG emission than if the energy were generated using fossil fuels. In contrast, stricter environmental constraints in Storyline 3 lead to a substantially lower CO₂ eq burden of 25 kg GJ⁻¹, which represents an 80% reduction compared to fossil fuels.     

Is it only CO2 that matters? A life cycle perspective on shallow geothermal systems

Shallow geothermal systems such as open and closed geothermal heat pump (GHP) systems are considered to be an efficient and renewable energy technology for cooling and heating of buildings and other facilities. The numbers of installed ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems, for example, is continuously increasing worldwide. The objective of the current study is not only to discuss the net energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or savings by GHP operation, but also to fully examine environmental burdens and benefits related to applications of such shallow geothermal systems by employing a state-of the-art life cycle assessment (LCA). The latter enables us to assess the entire energy flows and resources use for any product or service that is involved in the life cycle of such a technology. The applied life cycle impact assessment methodology (ReCiPe 2008) shows the relative contributions of resources depletion (34%), human health (43%) and ecosystem quality (23%) of such GSHP systems to the overall environmental damage. Climate change, as one impact category among 18 others, contributes 55.4% to the total environmental impacts. The life cycle impact assessment also demonstrates that the supplied electricity for the operation of the heat pump is the primary contributor to the environmental impact of GSHP systems, followed by the heat pump refrigerant, production of the heat pump, transport, heat carrier liquid, borehole and borehole heat exchanger (BHE). GHG emissions related to the use of such GSHP systems are carefully reviewed; an average of 63 t CO₂ equivalent emissions is calculated for a life cycle of 20 years using the Continental European electricity mix with 0.599 kg CO₂ eq/kWh. However, resulting CO₂ eq savings for Europe, which are between ?31% and 88% in comparison to conventional heating systems such as oil fired boilers and gas furnaces, largely depend on the primary resource of the supplied electricity for the heat pump, the climatic conditions and the inclusion of passive cooling capabilities. Factors such as degradation of coefficient of performance, as well as total leakage of the heat carrier fluid into the soil and aquifer are also carefully assessed, but show only minor environmental impacts.     

An oil palm-based biorefinery concept for cellulosic ethanol and phytochemicals production: Sustainability evaluation using exergetic life cycle assessment

In this study, thermo-environmental sustainability of an oil palm-based biorefinery concept for the co-production of cellulosic ethanol and phytochemicals from oil palm fronds (OPFs) was evaluated based on exergetic life cycle assessment (ExLCA). For the production of 1 tonne bioethanol, the exergy content of oil palm seeds was upgraded from 236 MJ to 77,999 MJ during the farming process for OPFs production. Again, the high exergy content of the OPFs was degraded by about 62.02% and 98.36% when they were converted into cellulosic ethanol and phenolic compounds respectively. With a total exergy destruction of about 958,606 MJ (internal) and 120,491 MJ (external or exergy of wastes), the biorefinery recorded an overall exergy efficiency and thermodynamic sustainability index (TSI) of about 59.05% and 2.44 per tonne of OPFs' bioethanol respectively. Due to the use of fossil fuels, pesticides, fertilizers and other toxic chemicals during the production, the global warming potential (GWP = 2265.69 kg CO₂ eq.), acidification potential (AP = 355.34 kg SO₂ eq.) and human toxicity potential (HTP = 142.79 kg DCB eq.) were the most significant environmental impact categories for a tonne of bioethanol produced in the biorefinery. The simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) unit emerged as the most exergetically efficient (89.66%), thermodynamically sustainable (TSI = 9.67) and environmentally friendly (6.59% of total GWP) production system.     

Life cycle environmental impact comparison of solid oxide fuel cells fueled by natural gas,hydrogen, ammonia and methanol for combined heat and power generation

This study aims to provide a comprehensive environmental life cycle assessment of heat and power production through solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) fueled by various chemical feeds namely; natural gas, hydrogen, ammonia and methanol. The life cycle assessment (LCA) includes the complete phases from raw material extraction or chemical fuel synthesis to consumption in the electrochemical reaction as a cradle-to-grave approach. The LCA study is performed using GaBi software, where the selected impact assessment methodology is ReCiPe 1.08. The selected environmental impact categories are climate change, fossil depletion, human toxicity, water depletion, particulate matter formation, and photochemical oxidant formation. The production pathways of the feed gases are selected based on the mature technologies as well as emerging water electrolysis via wind electricity. Natural gas is extracted from the wells and processed in the processing plant to be fed to SOFC. Hydrogen is generated by steam methane reforming method using the natural gas in the plant. Methanol is also produced by steam methane reforming and methanol synthesis reaction. Ammonia is synthesized using the hydrogen obtained from steam methane reforming and combined with nitrogen from air in a Haber-Bosch plant. Both hydrogen and ammonia are also produced via wind energy-driven decentralized electrolysis in order to emphasize the cleaner fuel production. The results of this study show that feeding SOFC systems with carbon-free fuels eliminates the greenhouse gas emissions during operation, however additional steps required for natural gas to hydrogen, ammonia and methanol conversion, make the complete process more environmentally problematic. However, if hydrogen and ammonia are produced from renewable sources such as wind-based electricity, the environmental impacts reduce significantly, yielding about 0.05 and 0.16 kg CO₂ eq., respectively, per kWh electricity generation from SOFC.     

CO2 savings of ground source heat pump systems – A regional analysis

In the current study the savings of CO₂ emissions due to the use of ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems was investigated in comparison to conventional heating systems. Based on a subsidy program for GSHP systems in southwest Germany, the regional, average, and total CO₂ savings of 1105 installed GSHP systems were determined on a regional scale. The emitted CO₂ per kWh of heating demand for the studied scenario resulted in 149 g CO₂/kWh for GSHP using the German electricity mix and 65 g CO₂/kWh using the regional electricity mix, which results in CO₂ savings of 35% or 72%, respectively. Similar CO₂ avoidances of GSHP systems were found in American and European studies ranging between 15% and 77% strongly depending on the supplied energy for the heat pumps and the efficiency of installation. The resulting CO₂ savings for one installed GSHP unit in the present study therefore range between 1800 and 4000 kg per year. Nevertheless, the minimum average total annual CO₂ savings of all installed GSHP systems due to the subsidy program amounted to 2000 tons per year. The maximum regional avoided additional CO₂ emissions are primarily associated with the affluent suburbs of the most densely populated area in the region. In 2006 the total contribution of CO₂ savings due to GSHP systems in Germany was only about 3.4% of the total renewable energies. However, continuously rising numbers of installed GSHP units and the increasing use of renewable electricity demonstrate that there is a fine opportunity to substantially avoid additional CO₂ emissions associated with the provision of heating (and cooling) of buildings and other facilities.     

Competition for the biomass resource: Greenhouse impacts and implications for renewable energy incentive schemes

In Australia, the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (MRET) scheme, which targets a 9.5 TWh per annum increase in renewable electricity generation by 2010, is stimulating interest in bioenergy. Development of bioenergy projects may cause competition for biomass resources. For example, sawmill residues are an attractive feedstock for bioenergy, but are also utilised for particleboard manufacture. This study compares the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation impacts of alternative scenarios where sawmill residues are used either for generation of electricity or for manufacture of particleboard. The study considers a theoretical particleboard plant processing 100 kt feedstock of dry sawmill residues per annum. If the sawmill residues are used instead for bioenergy, and the particleboard plant utilises fresh plantation biomass, 205 kt CO₂eq emissions are displaced. However, GHG emissions for particleboard manufacture increase by about 38 kt CO₂eq, equivalent to 19% of the fossil fuel emissions displaced, due to the higher fossil fuel requirements to harvest, transport, chip and dry the green biomass. Also, plantation carbon stock declines by 147 kt CO₂eq per year until a new equilibrium is reached after 30 years. This result is influenced particularly by the fossil fuel displaced, the relative efficiency of the fossil fuel and bioenergy plants, the moisture content of the sawmill residues, and the efficiency of the dryer in the particleboard plant.Under MRET, calculation of Renewable Energy Certificates is based solely on the quantity of power generated. This study illustrates that indirect consequences can reduce the GHG mitigation benefits of a bioenergy project. Increased emissions off-site, and loss of forest carbon stock, should be considered in calculating the net GHG mitigation benefit, and this should determine the credit earned by a bioenergy project.     

Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of slow pyrolysis biochar systems (PBS) in the UK for small, medium and large scale process chains and ten feedstocks was performed, assessing carbon abatement and electricity production. Pyrolysis biochar systems appear to offer greater carbon abatement than other bioenergy systems. Carbon abatement of 0.7–1.3 t CO₂ equivalent per oven dry tonne of feedstock processed was found. In terms of delivered energy, medium to large scale PBS abates 1.4–1.9 t CO₂e/MWh, which compares to average carbon emissions of 0.05–0.30 t CO₂e/MWh for other bioenergy systems. The largest contribution to PBS carbon abatement is from the feedstock carbon stabilised in biochar (40–50%), followed by the less certain indirect effects of biochar in the soil (25–40%)—mainly due to increase in soil organic carbon levels. Change in soil organic carbon levels was found to be a key sensitivity. Electricity production off-setting emissions from fossil fuels accounted for 10–25% of carbon abatement. The LCA suggests that provided 43% of the carbon in the biochar remains stable, PBS will out-perform direct combustion of biomass at 33% efficiency in terms of carbon abatement, even if there is no beneficial effect upon soil organic carbon levels from biochar application.     

Life cycle assessment of a Brassica carinata bioenergy cropping system in southern Europe

The energetic and environmental performance of production and distribution of the Brassica carinata biomass crop in Soria (Spain) is analysed using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology in order to demonstrate the major potential that the crop has in southern Europe as a lignocellulosic fuel for use as a renewable energy source.The Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) including midpoint impact analysis that was performed shows that the use of fertilizers is the action with the highest impact in six of the 10 environmental categories considered, representing between 51% and 68% of the impact in these categories.The second most important impact is produced when the diesel is used in tractors and transport vehicles which represents between 48% and 77%. The contribution of the B. carinata cropping system to the global warming category is 12.7 g CO₂ eq. MJ⁻¹ biomass produced. Assuming a preliminary estimation of the B. carinata capacity of translocated CO₂ (631 kg CO₂ ha⁻¹) from below-ground biomass into the soil, the emissions are reduced by up to 5.2 g CO₂ eq. MJ⁻¹.The production and transport are as far as a thermoelectric plant of the B. carinata biomass used as a solid fuel consumes 0.12 MJ of primary energy per 1 MJ of biomass energy stored. In comparison with other fossil fuels such as natural gas, it reduces primary energy consumption by 33.2% and greenhouse gas emission from 33.1% to 71.2% depending on whether the capacity of translocated CO₂ is considered or not.The results of the analysis support the assertion that B. carinata crops are viable from an energy balance and environmental perspective for producing lignocellulosic solid fuel destined for the production of energy in southern Europe. Furthermore, the performance of the crop could be improved, thus increasing the energy and environmental benefits.     

Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity options for the UK

The UK electricity mix will change significantly in the future. This provides an opportunity to consider the full life cycle sustainability of the options currently considered as most suitable for the UK: gas, nuclear, offshore wind and photovoltaics (PV). In an attempt to identify the most sustainable options and inform policy, this paper applies a sustainability assessment framework developed previously by the authors to compare these electricity options. To put discussion in context, coal is also considered as a significant contributor to the current electricity supply. Each option is assessed and compared in terms of its economic, environmental and social implications, using a range of sustainability indicators. The results show that no one technology is superior and that certain trade‐offs must be made. For example, nuclear and offshore wind power have the lowest life cycle environmental impacts, except for freshwater ecotoxicity for which gas is the best option; coal and gas are the cheapest options (£74 and 66/MWh, respectively, at 10% discount), but both have high global warming potential (1072 and 379 g CO₂ eq./kWh); PV has relatively low global warming potential (88 g CO₂ eq./kWh) but high cost (£302/MWh), as well as high ozone layer and resource depletion. Nuclear, wind and PV increase some aspects of energy security: in the case of nuclear, this is due to inherent fuel storage capabilities (energy density 290 million times that of natural gas), whereas wind and PV decrease fossil fuel import requirements by up to 0.2 toe/MWh. However, all three options require additional installed capacity for grid management. Nuclear also poses complex risk and intergenerational questions such as the creation of 10.16 m³/TWh of nuclear waste for long‐term geological storage. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of an integrated biomass gasification combined cycle (IBGCC) with CO2 removal

Based on the results of previous studies, the efficiency of a Brayton/Hirn combined cycle fuelled with a clean syngas produced by means of biomass gasification and equipped with CO₂ removal by chemical absorption reached 33.94%, considering also the separate CO₂ compression process. The specific CO₂ emission of the power plant was 178 kg/MW h. In comparison with values previously found for an integrated coal gasification combined cycle (ICGCC) with upstream CO₂ chemical absorption (38–39% efficiency, 130 kg/MW h specific CO₂ emissions), this configuration seems to be attractive because of the possibility of operating with a simplified scheme and because of the possibility of using biomass in a more efficient way with respect to conventional systems. In this paper, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted with presenting the results on the basis of the Eco-Indicator 95 impact assessment methodology. Further, a comparison with the results previously obtained for the LCA of the ICGCC was performed in order to highlight the environmental impact of biomass production with fossil fuels utilisation. The LCA shows the important environmental advantages of biomass utilisation in terms of reduction of both greenhouse gas emissions and natural resource depletion, although an improved impact assessment methodology may better highlight the advantages due to the biomass utilisation.     

An evaluation of greenhouse gas mitigation options for coal-fired power plants in the US Great Lakes States

We assessed options for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation in the US Great Lakes States, a region heavily dependent on coal-fired power plants. A proposed 600 MW power plant in northern Lower Michigan, USA provided context for our evaluation. Options to offset fossil CO₂ emissions by 20% included biomass fuel substitution from (1) forest residuals, (2) short-rotation woody crops, or (3) switchgrass; (4) biologic sequestration in forest plantations; and (5) geologic sequestration using CO₂ capture. Review of timber product output data, land cover data, and expected energy crop productivity on idle agriculture land within 120 km of the plant revealed that biomass from forestry residuals has the potential to offset 6% and from energy crops 27% of the annual fossil fuel requirement. Furthermore, annual forest harvest in the region is only 26% of growth and the surplus represents a large opportunity for forest products and bioenergy applications. We used Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare mitigation options, using fossil energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions per unit electricity generation as criteria. LCA results revealed that co-firing with forestry residuals is the most attractive option and geologic sequestration is the least attractive option, based on the two criteria. Biologic sequestration is intermediate but likely infeasible because of very large land area requirements. Our study revealed that biomass feedstock potentials from land and forest resources are not limiting mitigation activities, but the most practical approach is likely a combination of options that optimize additional social, environmental and economic criteria.