Fluticasone propionate nasal spray is more effective and has a faster onset of action than placebo in treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa

BACKGROUND: Controversy still exists about the treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa and treatment has never been objectively evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray compared to placebo nasal spray in the treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa. METHODS: A parallel randomized, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa. Two groups containing 10 patients with rhinitis medicamentosa in each group stopped their overuse of nasal vasoconstrictor spray immediately and were treated with either fluticasone propionate nasal spray once daily 200 micrograms, or placebo nasal spray for 14 days. The nasal mucosal swelling was recorded with rhinostereometry, acoustic rhinometry and a peak inspiratory flow meter. Nasal stuffiness was estimated on a visual analogue scale in the morning and in the evening of each day. RESULTS: The mucosal swelling decreased after 7 and 14 days of treatment with fluticasone propionate as well as placebo, but the reduction was significantly greater after treatment with fluticasone propionate. The symptom scores for nasal stuffiness showed a marked reduction during the treatment period in both groups, but there was a faster onset of symptom reduction after treatment with fluticasone propionate. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone propionate is more effective and has a faster onset of action than placebo in the treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa. An adequate treatment of these patients consists of a combination of vasoconstrictor withdrawal and a topical corticosteroid to alleviate the withdrawal process.     

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is safe and effective for children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

INTRODUCTION: Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a new topical corticosteroid preparation, is effective when given as 200 micrograms once daily in patients (> 12 years of age) with seasonal allergic rhinitis. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone proprionate aqueous nasal spray in children aged 4 to 11 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group. PATIENTS: Two hundred fifty children aged 4 to 11 years with moderate-to-severe nasal symptoms, a positive skin test reaction to a late-summer or autumn allergen, a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and documentation of an unsatisfactory response to conventional treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly assigned to receive fluticasone propionate, either 100 micrograms or 200 micrograms, or placebo, given by intranasal spray once daily in the morning for 14 days. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Severity of nasal symptoms (obstruction, rhinorrhea, itching, and sneezing) was recorded on visual analog scales by investigators at weekly visits and by patients (or adult guardian) daily in the evening. According to investigator and patient ratings, both fluticasone propionate 100 micrograms/d and 200 micrograms/d lowered total nasal symptom scores when compared with placebo. Both dosages of fluticasone propionate were more effective than placebo on the basis of investigator-rated overall clinical evaluation of efficacy at the end of treatment, with significant improvement (as opposed to moderate or mild improvement, no change or worsening) noted in 21% to 29% of the active-treatment groups vs 9% in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between the two fluticasone propionate dosages in any efficacy measurement. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations and frequency of drug-related adverse events were similar in the fluticasone propionate and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: In children as young as 4 years, 100 micrograms of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray given once daily is as effective as 200 micrograms given once daily, the usual adult dose for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both fluticasone propionate dosages were well tolerated and neither dosage appears to interfere with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in children.     

The efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray for allergic rhinitis and its relationship to topical effects

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is an intranasal corticosteroid for the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis. This double-masked, double-dummy, parallel-group study was conducted to confirm that the efficacy of fluticasone propionate nasal spray is attributable to topical rather than systemic effects. A total of 304 patients with documented seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive fluticasone propionate nasal spray 200 micrograms once daily (n = 77), oral fluticasone propionate 5 mg once daily (n = 73), oral fluticasone propionate 10 mg once daily (n = 77), or placebo (n = 77) for 14 days. Plasma fluticasone propionate concentrations were determined at baseline and after 14 days of treatment (day 15). Nasal symptoms were recorded daily by patients and assessed weekly by clinicians. On day 15, more patients in the oral fluticasone propionate 5-mg or 10-mg groups, compared with patients in the fluticasone propionate nasal spray group or the placebo group, had detectable plasma fluticasone propionate concentrations, and mean concentrations were higher in the oral fluticasone propionate groups. Both clinician- and patient-rated total and individual nasal symptom scores for obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching were significantly lower in the fluticasone propionate nasal spray group compared with either of the oral fluticasone propionate groups or the placebo group. With few exceptions, oral fluticasone propionate (5 mg or 10 mg) was not significantly different from placebo on any measures of efficacy. These findings indicate that the efficacy of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 micrograms once daily) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis results from direct topical effects rather than from indirect effects after systemic absorption.     

Intranasal fluticasone propionate is more effective than terfenadine tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy and tolerability of the intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone propionate with that of the antihistamine terfenadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two adults and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis received intranasal fluticasone propionate (200 micrograms once daily), terfenadine tablets (60 mg twice daily), or placebo for 2 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Main outcome measures were clinician- and patient-rated individual and total nasal symptom scores (based on ratings of nasal obstruction, sneezing, nasal itching, and rhinorrhea); clinician-rated overall response to therapy; changes in nasal inflammatory cell counts; adverse events; and morning plasma cortisol concentrations. RESULTS: Both clinician- and patient-rated total and individual nasal symptom scores were significantly lower in the fluticasone group than in either the terfenadine group or the placebo group at nearly every measured time point throughout the treatment period. After 2 weeks of therapy, clinician-rated total nasal symptom scores decreased by 49% in the fluticasone group compared with 27% in the terfenadine group and 19% in the placebo group. In general, therapy with terfenadine was not statistically distinguishable from that with placebo based on patient-rated total or individual nasal symptom scores. According to clinician ratings, 64% of fluticasone-treated patients compared with 49% and 44% of patients treated with terfenadine and placebo, respectively, experienced significant or moderate improvement. A greater percentage of fluticasone-treated patients compared with either terfenadine- or placebo-treated patients experienced reductions in intranasal eosinophil and basophil counts after 2 weeks of therapy. No unusual or serious drug-related adverse events were reported. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations after 2 weeks of therapy did not differ among groups. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone aqueous nasal spray, a well-tolerated corticosteroid preparation that can be administered once daily, is more effective than terfenadine tablets or placebo in controlling symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Interrater reliability issues in multicenter trials, Part I: Theoretical concepts and operational procedures used in Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #394

The most common upper respiratory illness is rhinitis. The majority of ENT specialists and general practitioners prescribe topical decongestants as first line therapy in rhinitis, independently of causes and kind of rhinitis. Long term use of topical vasoconstrictors for the nose may result in rhinitis medicamentosa, the rebound swelling of the nasal mucosa. The swelling probably is due to vasodilatation, but it may be also due to interstitial oedema. The prolonged use of decongestants may destroy the nasal cilia and mitochondria of epithelial cells, disturbing their function. Rhinitis medicamentosa from topical vasoconstrictor abuse results in nasal obstruction which can be life-threatening in neonates. Rhinitis medicamentosa is a increasing therapeutical problem that is best managed by prevention.     

Eosinophil markers in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Intranasal fluticasone propionate inhibits local and systemic increases during the pollen season

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to study activation markers of the eosinophil granulocytes in seasonal allergic rhinitis, and the impact of topical steroid therapy thereupon. METHODS: Sixty-three rhinitis patients with monoallergy to grass were examined before and at peak pollen season. Blood eosinophil count, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) in serum and nasal lavage fluid were measured. During the season, patients were randomized to treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate 0.1 mg o.d. (n=26), 0.2 mg o.d. (n=25), or placebo (n=12). Six healthy persons served as controls. RESULTS: During the season, all parameters, except nasal lavage ECP, increased in the placebo group (P<0.001-P<0.05). Significant differences were seen between the steroid groups and the placebo group for all parameters (P<0.001-P<0.05). Higher eosinophil count (P<0.05), serum EPO (P<0.02), and nasal lavage EPO (P<0.05) were found in patients before season than in controls. The following winter, 44 patients returned for repeated measurement. Lower levels of nasal lavage EPO were observed for patients than levels at the beginning of the season (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal fluticasone propionate reduced inflammation of the nasal mucosa, demonstrated locally by nasal lavage ECP and EPO, and systemically by blood eosinophils, serum ECP, and serum EPO. EPO seemed more sensitive than ECP as indicator of allergic inflammation. EPO demonstrated some perennial eosinophil activity in hay fever patients, increasing locally during spring.     

Prevalence of malingering in inpatient suicide ideators and attempters

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: In an attempt to study the pathogenesis of mucosal hypersensitivity in allergic rhinitis, we investigated the suppressive effects of cyclosporin A (CyA) and glucocorticosteroids on ovalbumin (OA)-induced hypersensitivity to topical histamine challenge. MATERIALS: Actively sensitized Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs. TREATMENT: OA and alum were applied to guinea pigs intraperitoneally 3 times at two-week intervals. After general sensitization, OA inhalation was performed every day for 6 days as topical sensitization. Before inhalation, treatment with CyA (50 mg/kg, p.o.), glucocorticosteroids (beclomethasone propionate (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.), fluticasone propionate (FP, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.)) or vehicle were performed, and the sensitivity to histamine was measured before and after the inhalation. Moreover, in actively (general and topical) sensitized guinea pigs, FP (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) was applied every day for 5 days and histamine sensitivity was evaluated before and after the application. RESULTS: We found that histamine sensitivity was significantly increased by nasal antigen challenge in this guinea pig model, and that the occurrence of histamine hypersensitivity was inhibited by the pretreatment with CyA and glucocorticosteroids. Although multiple administration of FP gradually reduced the histamine hypersensitivity according to the period of administration, it did not significantly alter the histamine hypersensitivity after the occurrence of hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that CyA and glucocorticosteroids suppress antigen-induced histamine hypersensitivity in a guinea pig model of allergic rhinitis.     

Expression of IL-16 in allergen-induced late-phase nasal responses and relation to topical glucocorticosteroid treatment

Allergen-induced late nasal responses (LNRs) are associated with a cellular infiltrate in which CD4+ cells are prominent. These cells have been shown to be the major cellular source of Th2-type cytokines. Mechanisms responsible for the local accumulation of CD4+ cells in the nasal mucosa after allergen exposure are unclear. IL-16 is a potent chemoattractant for CD4+ cells in vitro and may play a significant role in recruiting CD4+ cells in LNRs. We investigated the expression of IL-16 messenger RNA and immunoreactivity in nasal biopsy specimens from 17 subjects with allergic rhinitis. A biopsy specimen of the nasal inferior turbinate was obtained before and 24 hours after local nasal provocation with grass pollen extract after 6 weeks of treatment with either topical fluticasone propionate (n = 9) or placebo (n = 8) nasal spray twice daily. IL-16 mRNA-positive cells and IL-16-immunoreactive cells were identified in both the epithelium and the subepithelial tissue at baseline. Within the placebo-treated group, the numbers of epithelial and subepithelial IL-16 mRNA-positive cells and IL-16-immunoreactive cells were significantly increased 24 hours after challenge compared with baseline (p < 0.001). Topical glucocorticoid therapy resulted in a decrease in allergen-induced epithelial immunoreactive cells and subepithelial IL-16 mRNA-positive cells. The numbers of CD4+ cells increased after antigen challenge compared with baseline (p < 0.05), and this increase was inhibited by glucocorticoid treatment. There were significant correlations between epithelial and subepithelial IL-16 immunoreactivity and CD4+ cell infiltration after antigen challenge. The upregulation of IL-16 expression in allergic nasal mucosa after antigen challenge may have critical implications in the accumulation of CD4+ cells in response to antigen exposure. Steroid-mediated inhibition of IL-16 may be partly responsible for the decrease in local CD4+ cells after topical glucocorticoid therapy.     

The relationships between nasal hyperreactivity, quality of life, and nasal symptoms in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: A clinical test that could inform the clinician about the severity of a patient's nasal symptoms and health-related quality of life (QOL) would be very useful. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine whether, in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, nasal challenge with histamine could be used to estimate daily symptoms and QOL. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with perennial allergic rhinitis were challenged with histamine to determine nasal hyperreactivity. Nasal response was monitored by the number of sneezes, the amount of secretion, and a symptom score. Daily nasal symptoms were recorded during the 2 preceding weeks. Patients also completed a rhinitis QOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Responsiveness to histamine and total daily nasal symptoms were moderately correlated (r = 0.51, p = 0.001). Comparison of total daily nasal symptoms with the overall QOL score showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). Nasal response to histamine and overall QOL score were also correlated (r = 0.43, p = 0.002). However, overall QOL and daily nasal symptoms could be predicted by wide 95% confidence intervals only for each decade of nasal responsiveness to histamine (expressed as a composite symptom score). CONCLUSION: In patients with perennial allergic rhinitis nasal hyperreactivity as determined by histamine challenge, QOL, and daily nasal symptoms are moderately correlated. Therefore nasal histamine challenge can be used as a tool for estimating the severity of daily nasal symptoms and QOL, although it cannot predict nasal symptoms and QOL very accurately.     

Pharmacotherapy in the elderly--pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations]

OBJECTIVE: N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamic acid (NAAGA) was effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, with an action on early allergen-induced nasal symptoms and mediator release. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical activity of NAAGA and its effects on the late antigen-induced reaction in the nose. METHODS: Ten patients with allergic seasonal rhinitis were included in this randomized double-blind crossover trial of a 6% wt/vol solution of NAAGA (daily dosage 84 mg) versus placebo (lactose). The drug and placebo were administered intranasally five times daily for 1 week, with a 2-week interval between treatments. RESULTS: Treatment with NAAGA, but not with placebo, significantly reduced the late antigen-induced nasal symptoms, mainly nasal obstruction. Eosinophil numbers in the nasal lavages collected 6 h and 24 h after challenge were significantly lower after NAAGA than after placebo. Active treatment also significantly reduced the neutrophil count 6 h after antigen challenge, and significantly lowered eosinophil cationic protein and myeloperoxidase levels in nasal lavages 6 h and 24 h after antigen challenge. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that treatment for 1 week with NAAGA can reduce the late antigen-induced reaction in the nose. This is accompanied by a reduction in eosinophil and neutrophil recruitment and release of eosinophil cationic protein and myeloperoxidase.     

Video laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a case of biliary lithiasis associated with gallbladder tuberculosis. Considerations and review of the literature

METHODS: We have investigated the effects of allergen immunotherapy on the nasal responses in the guinea-pigs with allergic rhinitis. Thirty-three male Hartley guinea-pigs with allergic rhinitis were divided into three groups; those receiving intradermal injection of saline (Group 1) or 0.1% ovalbumin (Group 2) 6 days after the last intranasal sensitization, and those injected with 0.1% ovalbumin intradermally once daily for 6 consecutive days from the next day after the last intranasal sensitization (Group 3). RESULTS: The dye leakage and histamine content into the nasal lavage significantly decreased at 30 min after antigen challenge in Group 3, compared with Group 1 or 2. We also observed the change of mast cell numbers in superficial nasal mucosa, lamina propria and injected dorsal skin. The number of mast cells in superficial nasal mucosa significantly decreased in Group 3 compared with Group 1 or 2, but not those in nasal lamina propria or dorsal skin. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the improvements of nasal responses such as dye leakage and histamine content may be caused by the decrease of mast cell numbers in the superficial mucosal layer after the specific immunotherapy, which may be developing tolerance and one of the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of immunotherapy.     

Substance P is generated in vivo following nasal challenge of allergic individuals with bradykinin

BACKGROUND: Bradykinin, a potent inflammatory mediator, is released during allergic and non-allergic rhinitis and asthma in man. Nasal bradykinin challenge induces a dose-dependent plasma leakage into the nasal cavity and relevant symptoms of rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: We now report on substance P generation during nasal bradykinin challenge in vivo. METHODS: The effect of locally applied bradykinin on substance P generation was studied in nine individuals, allergic to grass pollen and six non-allergic controls. In the allergics TAME-esterase activity, histamine and substance P concentrations were measured in nasal lavages and correlated to the clinical symptoms. RESULTS: Substance P concentrations in nasal lavages increased in a dose-dependent fashion during nasal bradykinin challenge in both groups. In the allergic group Substance P-increases correlated with the production of TAME-esterase activity (r = 0.9, P < 0.05) whereas these allergic individuals did not produce any histamine increases. The generation of substance P and the increase of TAME-esterase activity was associated with the onset of clinical symptoms. Correlation of oedema and hypersecretion to substance P were significant by linear regression analysis (r = 0.88, P < 0.005 and r = 0.89, P < 0.02, respectively). Bradykinin induced irritations like burning and itching were short-term and rare. Serial dilutions of nasal washes produced Substance P-RIA displacement curves that paralleled the standard curve and recovery of standard substance P that was added to nasal washes was 76 +/- 4% (mean +/- SEM), n = 8. CONCLUSION: Bradykinin induces in vivo a dose-dependent plasma leakage into the nasal cavity without affecting mast cells, but stimulates nerve endings resulting in the release of the neuropeptide substance P.     

Mometasone furoate. A review of its intranasal use in allergic rhinitis

Mometasone furoate is a synthetic corticosteroid which has been evaluated for intranasal use in the treatment of adults and children with allergic rhinitis. In several large, well-controlled clinical trials, mometasone furoate 200 micrograms administered once daily as an aqueous intranasal spray was significantly more effective than placebo in controlling the symptoms associated with moderate to severe seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate or once-daily fluticasone propionate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis, and was as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate and slightly more effective than once-daily oral loratadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was also as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate or once-daily budesonide, and significantly more effective than placebo in the prophylaxis of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The onset of action of mometasone furoate was approximately 7 hours in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate and budesonide in clinical trials, with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to placebo. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and of limited duration. The most common adverse events associated with mometasone furoate therapy were nasal irritation and/or burning, headache, epistaxis and pharyngitis. Intranasal or oral mometasone furoate had no detectable effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in studies of < or = 1 year in duration. CONCLUSIONS: Mometasone furoate is a well tolerated intranasal corticosteroid with minimal systemic activity and an onset of action of < or = 7 hours. It is effective in the prophylaxis and treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis in patients with moderate to severe symptoms.     

The effect of terfenadine on unilateral nasal challenge with allergen

To investigate the role of H1 receptor-mediated effects in allergic rhinitis, we challenged 12 allergic volunteers with allergen 2 hours after administration of either placebo or 60 mg of terfenadine. Filter paper discs were used for the unilateral administration of allergen and the collection of nasal secretions. Secretion weights, levels of histamine in recovered nasal secretions, and nasal airway resistance (NAR) were measured for each nostril separately, and the number of sneezes was counted. After placebo treatment, allergen challenge led to significant increases in ipsilateral and contralateral secretion weights, ipsilateral histamine levels, ipsilateral NAR, and sneezing. Contralateral histamine levels were not elevated. H1 antagonism with terfenadine markedly reduced the number of sneezes and partially decreased ipsilateral and contralateral secretion weights, without affecting the increase in NAR. Terfenadine premedication also lowered the amount of histamine in ipsilateral secretions after allergen challenge. Performing identical nasal challenges with a 10-fold lower dose of antigen produced similar results. Previous studies showed that terfenadine had no effect on methacholine provocation and completely abolished ipsilateral and contralateral secretion weights after histamine challenge. We conclude that sneezing after allergen challenge is caused almost exclusively by a reflex initiated through H1 receptors and that H1 antagonism has no influence on allergen-induced increases in NAR. Unilateral allergen challenge leads to bilateral increases in secretion weights, which are only partially inhibited by terfenadine, suggesting the involvement of mediators other than histamine in the nasonasal reflex. As reported earlier, terfenadine also decreases allergen-induced histamine release after challenge with the highest dose of antigen.     

Preseasonal intranasal immunotherapy in birch-alder allergic rhinitis. A double-blind study

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to test the clinical efficacy and safety of local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) in powder form. Twenty-two patients suffering from allergic rhinitis strictly associated with early spring symptoms, with positive skin prick tests and RAST for birch-alder, all responders to a specific nasal provocation test (NPT), received randomly active or placebo treatment for 4 months. Immunotherapy consisted of administration of a set of capsules containing progressively increasing amounts of birch (Betula pendula) and speckled alder (Alnus incana) allergens in powder form with controlled granulometry. The active (birch-alder) and placebo (lactose) group completed the treatment according to a similar schedule. During the pollen season (March-April), the patients who took the active treatment reported less sneezing and rhinorrhea than the placebo group, on the basis of a symptoms score, and the differences were statistically significant; the need for drugs (terfenadine) was also significantly reduced. These findings agreed well with the results of specific NPT after the treatment; only patients in the active group had a higher threshold dose of nasal specific reactivity to birch-alder allergens than in tests before the LNIT.     

Cervical actinomycosis. A rare differential diagnosis of parotid tumor]

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is usually treated with oral antihistamines or nasal steroids. Topically active nasal antihistamine is a new treatment modality for allergic rhinitis. The efficacy in comparison to well established topical treatment alternatives is not fully known. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intranasally administered azelastine to budesonide, at their respectively recommended dosage, on the symptoms of perennial rhinitis patients. METHODS: A placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal budesonide aqueous suspension (256 microg once daily) with azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray (280 microg twice daily (560 microg/day)) and with placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. The 195 patients (with at least a 2-year history of perennial allergic rhinitis) recorded individual nasal symptom scores, the degree of symptom control achieved and any adverse events experienced over a 2-week baseline period and a 6-week treatment period. RESULTS: Following treatment, the reductions in mean combined and individual nasal symptom scores from baseline values were significantly greater in the budesonide group compared with the placebo group (P < .0001 for all variables except runny nose P = .01). In patients treated with budesonide, there were also significantly larger reductions from baseline values in combined nasal symptom scores (P < .01) and in scores for all individual nasal symptoms (P < or = .05) compared with those treated with azelastine. The reductions from baseline in both combined and individual nasal symptom scores did not differ between azelastine and placebo. The study medications were well tolerated, producing no unexpected or serious treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: A once-daily dose of 256 microg of intranasal budesonide aqueous suspension is significantly more effective at relieving the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis compared with a twice daily dose of 280 microg of azelastine nasal spray.     

Detection and quantification of Epstein-Barr virus EBER1 in EBV-infected cells by fluorescent in situ hybridization and flow cytometry

BACKGROUND: The level of histamine in nasal lavage fluid has been used as an index of mast cell/basophil activation in a number of studies. Obviously, such an index can only be valid if changes in the secretory activity of nasal glands do not affect the level of histamine in lavage fluid (i.e. hypersecretion, without a simultaneous activation of mast cells/basophils in the nasal mucosa, must not increase the level of histamine). OBJECTIVES: To asses the effect of nasal hypersecretion on histamine levels in lavage fluid. METHODS: Nasal challenges were performed with methacholine and allergen in grass pollen-allergic patients and non-allergic controls. Nasal lavage fluid was collected before and repeatedly for nine hours after nasal challenge, and the level of histamine was compared with that of a specific mast cell-derived enzyme, tryptase. In addition, the effect of methacholine on basophils was examined in vitro. RESULTS: Allergen challenge of allergic patients produced sneezing and a significant increase in histamine and tryptase levels, whereas challenge of non-allergic subjects produced no such response. Interestingly, challenge with methacholine also induced a significant increase in histamine levels. This increase was seen in both allergic and non-allergic subjects and it was not associated with any sneezing or increase in tryptase levels, indicating that mast cells were not activated. Furthermore, stimulation of basophils with methacholine did not induce any histamine release in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Apparently, there exists a pool of histamine in the human nose that can be transferred to lavage fluid during glandular hypersecretion. The source of this histamine is yet to be identified. As the level of histamine seems to be affected by the secretory activity of nasal glands, we question the use of this single mediator as an index of mast cell/basophil activation in nasal lavage studies.     

Medicine and the manic defence

It has been suggested that the onset of the late phase response (LPR) and hyperreactivity to non-specific stimuli occurs in the lower airway. However, its relationship in the nose has not yet been studied. This study was designed to examine the mechanism of LPR and the relationship between LPR and hyperreactivity. A total of 25 Japanese cedar pollinosis patients participated in this study. On the first visit, the frequency of sneezes, weight of nasal discharge, and the nasal airway resistance (NAR) were time-dependently measured without antigen challenge. The histamine reactivity was observed after 12 h. The same protocol was used during the second to fourth visits. The frequency of sneezes, weight of nasal discharge, and NAR were measured continuously for 12 h after antigen challenge, and nasal reactivity to histamine was observed. The percent change of NAR during immediate phase response (IR) and during LPR showed a significant correlation. The frequency of sneezes and weight of nasal discharge induced by histamine were both significantly higher in the positive than in the negative LPR group. These results suggest that the chemical mediators and inflammatory cells inducing nasal swelling during IR cause, directly or indirectly, nasal swelling during LPR, and induce hyperreactivity to histamine.     

An in situ nanoindentation specimen holder for a high voltage transmission electron microscope

BACKGROUND: Allergen-induced late nasal responses are associated with recruitment of T lymphocytes and eosinophils, and preferential messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of 'TH2-type' cytokines. We previously showed that topical steroid inhibited the late response and associated tissue eosinophilia. In this study we tested the hypothesis that granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) may contribute to late-responses and tissue eosinophilia and is inhibitable by topical corticosteroid. METHODS: Nasal biopsies were taken before and 24 h after nasal allergen provocation following 6 weeks of treatment with either a nasal corticosteroid spray (fluticasone propionate) or a matched placebo nasal spray twice daily. Cryostat sections were processed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to assess cytokine mRNA expression for GM-CSF. RESULTS: Increases in T lymphocytes and eosinophils were seen in the nasal mucosa after allergen challenge (p = 0.01) which were accompanied by a 5-fold increase in cells expressing mRNA for GM-CSF (p = 0.01). Double immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization demonstrated that the majority of GM-CSF mRNA+ cells were co-localized to CD68+ (40%), or T cells (40%) with a lesser contribution from eosinophils (<20%). Topical steroid treatment was accompanied by a decrease in both the CD3+ and major basic protein (MBP+) cells expressing GM-CSF mRNA (p = 0.01) with a corresponding proportionate increase in the % of macrophages expressing GM-CSF. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that after allergen provocation, eosinophils are recruited to the nasal mucosa and that, at least in part, this may be due to GM-CSF. Topical nasal corticosteroid inhibits late responses and the associated eosinophilia, possibly indirectly by decreasing GM-CSF from T lymphocytes or reducing autocrine production of GM-CSF from eosinophils.     

The effect of IL-4 on human nasal mucosal responses

Interleukin (IL)-4 causes the dose limiting sensation of nasal congestion when administered systematically at doses of 3 micrograms/kg or higher thrice daily to humans. This side effect was observed in a group of patients treated as part of an immunotherapy protocol for cancer management. To determine the source of this congestion, nasal secretions were collected prospectively in a group of patients at baseline and after provocation with normal saline, methacholine (which stimulates glandular secretion), and histamine (which causes increased vascular permeability). Nasal lavages obtained at baseline and after provocation were analyzed for the presence of these glandular and vascular proteins and inflammatory mediators. Washings and provocations were performed before IL-4 administration, after 24 hours of IL-4 treatment, and after 3 days of treatment, at a time when nasal congestion was maximal. Compared with histamine challenge before IL-4 treatment, the secretion of the plasma proteins albumin and IgG were significantly decreased after 3 days of IL-4 treatment. IL-4 treatment had no apparent effect on methacholine-induced responses. Thus systemically administered IL-4 causes the subjective sensation of nasal congestion, increased histamine in nasal lavages, and the development of vascular unresponsiveness to histamine, without affecting parasympathetic responses to histamine. The relationships among increases in nasal lavage histamine, vascular unresponsiveness to histamine, and the sensation of nasal congestion are unclear.