Effects of postbreeding gonadotropin treatments on conception rates of lactating dairy cows subjected to timed artificial insemination or embryo transfer in a tropical environment

The objective of experiment 1 was to evaluate the effects of treatments with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or GnRH 7 d after induced ovulation on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows submitted to timed artificial insemination (TAI) or timed embryo transfer (TET). A total of 834 potential breedings were used from 661 lactating Holstein cows (37.3 ± 0.3 kg of milk/d). Cows had ovulation synchronized and were assigned randomly to receive TAI on d 0 or TET on d 7. Within each group, cows were assigned randomly to receive on d 7 no additional treatment (control; n_TAI = 156; n_TET = 126), a 100 μg i.m. injection of GnRH (n_TAI = 155; n_TET = 124), or a 2,500 IU i.m. injection of hCG (n_TAI = 151; n_TET = 122). Postbreeding treatment affected the percentages of pregnant cows at TET on d 28 (control: 38.1%; GnRH: 52.4%; hCG: 45.1%) and on d 60 (control: 32.5%; GnRH: 41.1%; hCG: 38.5%), but postbreeding treatment did not affect percentages of pregnant cows at TAI on d 28 (control: 30.1%; GnRH: 32.2%; hCG: 32.4%) or on d 60 (control: 25.6%; GnRH: 27.1%; hCG: 29.8%). The objective of experiment 2 was to evaluate the effect of a treatment with GnRH 7 d after TET on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows that received a previous GnRH treatment at TET. A total of 285 potential breedings were used from 257 lactating Holstein cows (35.1 ± 0.8 kg of milk/d). Cows had ovulation synchronized and were assigned for TET on d 7. Immediately after TET, all cows were treated with a 100 μg i.m. injection of GnRH. On d 14, cows were assigned randomly to receive (G7-14; n = 147) or not (G7; n = 138) an additional injection of GnRH. Pregnancy diagnosis were performed on d 28 and 60. The additional treatment with GnRH on d 14 did not affect the percentages of pregnant cows on d 28 (G7: 48.5%; G7-14: 42.9%) or on d 60 (G7: 39.8%; G7-14: 37.4%). In conclusion, treatment with GnRH or hCG 7 d after induced ovulation increased conception rates in lactating dairy cows submitted to TET, but not in cows submitted to TAI. Moreover, treatment with GnRH 7 d after TET did not enhance reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows that received a previous GnRH treatment at TET.     

Maintenance of pregnancy in dairy cattle after treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin or gonadotropin-releasing hormone

The objectives were to determine whether a single injection of either human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or GnRH would: 1) increase ancillary formation of new luteal structures, 2) increase serum concentrations of progesterone, and 3) increase pregnancy survival in dairy females treated once between 26 and 71 d of pregnancy. A total of 421 cows were enrolled between January and November 2001, with 92, 106, and 223 females (included 68 nulliparous heifers at 1 location) treated at the 3 locations. Upon diagnosis of pregnancy, females were allocated randomly to receive 100 μg of GnRH, 1,000 IU of hCG, or 2 mL of saline. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, and 4 wk after treatment, and pregnancy status was reassessed at 1, 2, and 4 wk. New luteal structures were formed in 23.8% of cattle, with hCG (50%) and GnRH (26%) being more effective than saline (7%). Treatment had no effect on the proportion of females forming 2 new luteal structures (7.6%), and 36.2% of all induced structures regressed during the 4-wk study period. Pregnancy losses were unaffected by treatment, stage of pregnancy, or number of induced luteal structures but were nearly 9-fold greater in females in which induced luteal structures regressed. No loss occurred in females having 2 new luteal structures. Pregnancy losses decreased quadratically from 30 to 42 d. Serum progesterone did not differ among treatments, but among females forming new luteal structures, progesterone was greater at 1 (7.2 ± 0.3 vs. 6.3 ± 0.2 ng/ mL) and 2 wk (7.0 ± 0.3 vs. 6.1 ± 0.2 ng/mL) after treatment. Progesterone at the first pregnancy diagnosis was predictive of imminent pregnancy loss; the lower the initial progesterone, the sooner subsequent loss was observed. The right ovary was dominant in the location of new luteal structures. Regression of new luteal structures occurred more often on the left ovary and contra-lateral to the corpus luteum of pregnancy (53.2 vs. 22%). In conclusion, treatment of dairy cattle with either GnRH or hCG failed to prevent pregnancy loss, but concentrations of progesterone were predictive of subsequent pregnancy loss.     

Effect of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration 2 days after insemination on progesterone concentration and pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a single administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) during the establishment of the corpus luteum (CL) on progesterone (P4) concentration and pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows. Postpartum spring-calving lactating dairy cows (n = 800; mean ± SD days in milk and parity were 78.5 ± 16.7 and 2.3 ± 0.8, respectively) on 3 farms were enrolled on the study. All cows underwent the same fixed-time AI (FTAI) protocol involving a 7-d progesterone-releasing intravaginal device with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) administration at device insertion, prostaglandin at device removal followed by GnRH 56 h later, and AI 16 h after the second GnRH injection. Cows were blocked on days postpartum, body condition score, and parity and randomly assigned to receive either 3,000 IU of hCG 2 d after FTAI or no further treatment (control). Blood samples were collected on d 7 and 14 postestrus by coccygeal venipuncture on a subset of 204 cows to measure serum P4 concentration, and pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography approximately 30 and 70 d after FTAI. Administration of hCG caused an increase in circulating P4 concentrations compared with the control treatment on d 7 (+22.2%) and d 14 (+25.7%). The P/AI at 30 d after FTAI was affected by treatment, farm, body condition score, and calving to service interval. Overall, administration of hCG decreased P/AI (46.3% vs. 55.1% for the control). Among cows that did not become pregnant following AI, a greater proportion of control cows exhibited a short repeat interval (≤17 d) compared with cows treated with hCG (8.6% vs. 2.8%, respectively). In addition, the percentages of cows pregnant at d 21 (59.6% vs. 52.0%) and d 42 (78.3% vs. 71.9%) were greater in control than in hCG-treated cows. The overall incidence of embryo loss was 10.7% and was not affected by treatment. There was a tendency for an interaction between treatment and CL status at synchronization protocol initiation for both P4 concentration and P/AI. In conclusion, administration of hCG 2 d after FTAI increased circulating P4 concentrations. Unexpectedly, cows treated with hCG had lower fertility; however, this negative effect on fertility was manifested primarily in cows lacking a CL at the onset of the synchronization protocol.     

Replacing the first gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment in an Ovsynch protocol with human chorionic gonadotropin decreased pregnancies per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows

Our objective was to compare the effect of treatment with GnRH at the first treatment (G1) of the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of a Double-Ovsynch (DO) protocol with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows. In experiment 1, lactating dairy cows (n = 1,932) submitted to a DO protocol for first timed artificial insemination (TAI) on 2 commercial dairy farms were blocked by parity (primiparous vs. multiparous) and were randomly assigned to receive 100 µg of GnRH versus 2,500 IU of hCG at G1. Overall, P/AI 39 d after TAI for cows inseminated with sexed dairy semen was greater for cows treated with GnRH than for cows treated with hCG within each parity (primiparous: 42.6% vs. 38.2%; multiparous: 39.4% vs. 30.3%). Similarly, P/AI 39 d after TAI for multiparous cows inseminated with conventional beef semen tended to be greater for cows treated with GnRH than for cows treated with hCG (41.1% vs. 34.3%). In experiment 2, lactating Holstein cows (n = 43) were blocked by parity and were randomly assigned to the treatment protocols described for experiment 1. Ovaries were evaluated with transrectal ultrasonography immediately before treatment and 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40 h after treatment to assess time from treatment to ovulation, and blood samples were collected immediately before G1, at the first PGF_2α treatment, 8 and 16 h later, at the second PGF_2α treatment, 8 and 16 h later, at the second GnRH (G2) treatment, and at TAI to compare luteolysis based on serum progesterone (P4) concentrations. Although mean (± standard error of the mean) time from treatment to ovulation was approximately 2 h greater for cows treated with hCG than for cows treated with GnRH (33.7 ± 0.6 vs. 31.5 ± 0.6 h), P4 concentrations during luteolysis and the proportion of cows with complete luteolysis (P4 <0.4 ng/mL at G2) did not differ between treatments. We conclude that replacing 100 µg of GnRH with 2,500 IU of hCG at G1 of a DO protocol decreased fertility to TAI in lactating dairy cows but did not affect the rate or completeness of luteolysis despite the increased interval from treatment to ovulation.     

Effect of treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin 7 days after artificial insemination or at the time of embryo transfer on reproductive outcomes in nulliparous Holstein heifers

Our objective was to assess the effect of treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 7 d after artificial insemination (AI) or at the time of in vitro-fertilized (IVF) embryo transfer on reproductive outcomes, including progesterone (P4), interferon-tau stimulated gene 15 (ISG15), pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB), and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) or pregnancies per embryo transfer (P/ET), in nulliparous Holstein heifers. Heifers in experiment 1 were randomly assigned to receive no treatment (control; n = 129) or 2,000 IU of hCG 7 d after AI to a detected estrus (estrus = experimental d 0; hCG; n = 132). Heifers in experiment 2 were randomly assigned to receive no treatment (control; n = 143) or 2,000 IU of hCG (hCG; n = 148) at transfer of an IVF embryo 7 d after the last GnRH treatment of a 5-d controlled internal drug release-synch protocol (last GnRH = experimental d 0). Blood samples were collected from a subgroup of heifers (experiment 1, n = 82; experiment 2, n = 104) at d 7, 11, 18, 20, 25, 28, and 32, and blood samples from heifers diagnosed pregnant were collected on d 35, 39, 46, 53, 60, and 67. Blood samples were assayed for P4 by RIA and for PSPB by ELISA, and expression of ISG15 was assessed in mRNA isolated from blood leukocytes on d 18 and 20. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and logistic regression using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures. In both experiments, treatment with hCG increased P4 concentrations from d 11 to 32; however, treatment did not affect P/AI or P/ET at d 32 or 67, PSPB concentrations from d 11 to 67 of pregnancy, or relative ISG15 mRNA concentrations on d 18 or 20. Heifers diagnosed not pregnant at d 32 in experiment 2 with an extended luteal phase (>20 d) and treated with hCG had greater relative ISG15 mRNA concentrations on d 20 than control heifers. Treatment with hCG did not affect pregnancy loss in experiment 1, whereas heifers treated with hCG at the time of IVF embryo transfer had fewer pregnancy losses from d 32 to 67 than control heifers. We concluded that treatment with 2,000 IU of hCG 7 d after AI or at the time of embryo transfer increased P4 concentrations without affecting P/AI or P/ET in nulliparous Holstein heifers.     

Interactions of human chorionic gonadotropin with genotype and parity on fertility responses of lactating dairy cows

Fertility-promoting effects of treatment of lactating dairy cattle with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) after artificial insemination (AI) have been variable. Here, we tested whether fertility response to hCG in lactating Holstein cows interacts with genotype and parity. Primiparous (n = 538) and multiparous (n = 613) cows were treated with hCG (3,300 IU) or vehicle 5 d after AI. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 32 and 60 after AI. A subset of cows (n = 593–701) was genotyped for 4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) previously associated with fertility. Treatment with hCG increased progesterone concentration on d 12 after AI regardless of genotype or parity. Pregnancy per AI was improved by hCG in primiparous cows but not in multiparous cows. Moreover, hCG treatment interacted with a SNP in coenzyme Q9 (COQ9) to affect fertility. Fertility of cows treated with vehicle was greatest for the AA allele, whereas fertility was lowest for the same genotype among cows treated with hCG. Pregnancy per AI was also affected by genotype for heat shock protein A1-like (HSPA1L) and progesterone receptor (PGR), but no interactions were observed with treatment. Genotype for a SNP in prostate androgen-regulated mucin-like protein 1 (PARM1) was not associated with fertility. Overall, results show that variation in response to hCG treatment on fertility depends on parity and interacts with a SNP in COQ9.     

Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone after first timed artificial insemination improves fertility in noncycling lactating dairy cows

Lactating Holstein cows were assigned randomly to treatments to improve fertility after first postpartum timed artificial insemination (TAI). In Experiment 1, cows received no treatment (control; n = 9), a controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) insert from 5 to 12 d after TAI (CIDR; n = 9), or 100 μg of GnRH 5 d after TAI (G5; n = 7). Although treatments did not affect circulating progesterone (P₄) concentrations from 5 to 19 d after TAI, there was a tendency for CIDR cows to have greater P₄ compared with control or G5 cows within 24 h after treatment. In 2 field trials, cows received either control (n = 223), CIDR (n = 218), or G5 (n = 227) treatments (Experiment 2), or control (n = 160), G5 (n = 159), or treatment with 100 μg of GnRH 7 d after TAI (G7; n = 163; Experiment 3). Treatment did not affect pregnancies per AI (P/AI) in Experiments 2 or 3; however, when data were combined to compare control (n = 383) and G5 (n = 386) treatments, P/AI tended to be greater for G5 (49.1%) than for control (45.8%) cows. This effect resulted from a GnRH treatment × cyclicity status interaction in which P/AI for noncycling cows receiving G5 was greater than for noncycling control cows (45.5 vs. 31.1%). In conclusion, treatment with CIDR inserts after TAI had no effect on P/AI, whereas treatment with GnRH 5 d after TAI improved P/AI for noncycling, but not for cycling cows.     

Effect of equine chorionic gonadotropin treatment during a progesterone-based timed artificial insemination program on reproductive performance in seasonal-calving lactating dairy cows

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of progesterone (P4)-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) programs on fertility in seasonal-calving, pasture-based dairy herds. A total of 1,421 lactating dairy cows on 4 spring-calving farms were stratified based on days in milk (DIM) and parity and randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: (1) control: no hormonal treatment; cows inseminated at detected estrus; (2) P4-Ovsynch: cows received a 7-d P4-releasing intravaginal device (PRID Delta; CEVA Santé Animale, Libourne, France) with 100 μg of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog (Ovarelin; CEVA Santé Animale) at PRID insertion, a 25-mg injection of PGF_2α (Enzaprost; CEVA Santé Animale) at PRID removal, GnRH at 56 h after device removal and TAI 16 h later; (3) P4-Ovsynch+eCG: the same as P4-Ovsynch, but cows received 500 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG; Syncrostim; CEVA Santé Animale) at PRID removal. At 10 d before mating start date (MSD), all cows that were ≥35 DIM were examined by transrectal ultrasound to assess presence or absence of a corpus luteum; body condition score (BCS) was also recorded. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal ultrasonography 30 to 35 d after insemination. Overall pregnancy/AI (P/AI) was not different between groups (50.9, 49.8, and 46.3% for control, P4-Ovsynch, and P4-Ovsynch+eCG, respectively) but the 21-d pregnancy rate was increased by the use of synchronization (35.0, 51.7, and 47.2%, respectively). Compared with the control group, synchronization significantly reduced the interval from MSD to conception (34.6, 23.0, and 26.5 d, respectively) and consequently reduced the average days open (98.0, 86.0, and 89.0 d). Across all treatment groups, DIM at the start of synchronization affected P/AI (42.3, 49.5, and 53.9% for <60, 60–80, and >80 DIM, respectively), but neither parity (46.5, 50.4, and 48.4% for parity 1, 2, and ≥3, respectively) nor BCS (44.0, 49.4, and 58.6% for ≤2.50, 2.75–3.25, and ≥3.50, respectively) affected the likelihood of P/AI. Two-way interactions between treatment and DIM, parity, or BCS were not detected. In conclusion, the use of TAI accelerated pregnancy establishment in cows in a pasture-based system by reducing days open, but eCG administration at PRID removal did not affect P/AI.     

Factors influencing upfront single-and multiple-ovulation incidence, progesterone, and luteolysis before a timed insemination resynchronization protocol

Our objectives were to determine relationships among factors influencing responses to the first GnRH injection in a timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol and subsequent fertility after altering timing of the second GnRH injection and AI relative to PGF_2α injection. Replacement heifers (n = 86) and 613 lactating cows previously inseminated were diagnosed not pregnant to form 77 breeding clusters spanning 36 mo. At not-pregnant diagnosis (d 0), females received 100 μg of GnRH, and then 7 d later, they received 25 mg of PGF_2α. Females in 2 treatments received GnRH 48 h (G48) after PGF_2α injection and TAI at the time of the second GnRH injection (G48 + TAI48) or 24 h later (G48 + TAI72). Females in the third treatment received GnRH 72 h after PGF_2α when inseminated (G72 + TAI72). Neither timing of GnRH nor time of AI altered TAI pregnancy rates (average of 20.4%). Ovaries of females in 65 clusters were scanned on d 0 (first GnRH injection) and 7 d later (PGF_2α injection). Ovarian structures were mapped and ovulation in response to the first GnRH injection was evaluated on d 7. When estrus was detected before scheduled TAI, females were inseminated; otherwise, TAI conception of remaining females was based on timing of GnRH and AI in 3 treatments. On d 7, 1 or more new corpora lutea (CL) were detected in 43% of females and their pregnancy rate was subsequently greater (28 vs. 18%) than those not ovulating. Follicle diameters on d 0 did not differ between females that did (11.9 ± 0.3 mm) and did not (11.8 ± 0.4 mm) subsequently ovulate in response to GnRH. Follicle diameter and number of follicles ≥5 mm increased with increasing lactation number, but decreased with increasing number of CL. Diameter of follicles in which more than 1 follicle ovulated decreased linearly from that in which only 1 follicle ovulated. Incidence of ovulation increased with increasing lactation number and total number of follicles ≥5 mm, but decreased with increasing number of CL. Incidence of multiple ovulations (15%) was greater in females having more follicles ≥5 mm and in those in early diestrus. Multiple ovulation did not occur in heifers, but was decreased in cows having more than 1 CL. In cows having more than 1 CL, luteal regression was reduced by 5.6 percentage units compared with those having 1 CL. In a TAI protocol, pregnancy rate was greater for females in early diestrus compared with females in other stages of the cycle, in those that ovulated after the first GnRH injection, in those having luteolysis, and in those inseminated during nonsummer months.     

Resynchronization of ovulation protocols for dairy cows including or not including gonadotropin-releasing hormone to induce a new follicular wave: Effects on re-insemination pattern,ovarian responses,and pregnancy outcomes

Our objectives were to evaluate the pattern of re-insemination, ovarian responses, and pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) of cows submitted to different resynchronization of ovulation protocols. The base protocol started at 25 ± 3 d after artificial insemination (AI) and was as follows: GnRH, 7 and 8 d later PGF_2α, GnRH 32 h after second PGF_2α, and fixed timed AI (TAI) 16 to 18 h after GnRH. At 18 ± 3 d after AI, cows were randomly assigned to the G25 (n = 1,100) or NoG25 (n = 1,098) treatments. The protocol for G25 and NoG25 was the same, except that cows in NoG25 did not receive GnRH 25 ± 3 d after AI. At nonpregnancy diagnosis (NPD), 32 ± 3 d after AI, cows from G25 and NoG25 with a corpus luteum (CL) ≥15 mm in diameter and a follicle ≥10 mm completed the protocol (G25 CL = 272, NoG25 CL = 194), whereas cows from both treatments that did not meet these criteria received a modified Ovsynch protocol with P4 supplementation [controlled internal drug release insert plus GnRH, controlled internal drug release insert removal, and PGF_2α 7 and 8 d later, GnRH 32 h after second PGF_2α, and TAI 16 to 18 h after GnRH (G25 NoCL = 53, NoG25 NoCL = 78)]. Serum concentrations of progesterone (P4) were determined and ovarian ultrasonography was performed thrice weekly from 18 ± 3 d after AI until 1 d after TAI (G25 = 46, NoG25 = 44 cows). A greater percentage of NoG25 cows were re-inseminated at detected estrus (NoG25 = 53.5%, G25 = 44.6%), whereas more cows had a CL at NPD in G25 than NoG25 (83.7 and 71.3%). At 32 d after AI, P/AI was similar for G25 and NoG25 for inseminations at detected estrus (38.4 and 42.9%), TAI services for cows with no CL (40.4 and 36.7%), and for all services combined (39.6 and 39.0%). However, P/AI were greater for cows with a CL in G25 than NoG25 (40.6 and 32.8%) that received TAI. More cows ovulated spontaneously or in response to GnRH for the G25 than the NoG25 treatment (70 and 36%) but a similar proportion had an active follicle at NPD (G25 = 91% and NoG25 = 96%). The largest follicle diameter at NPD (G25 = 15.0 ± 0.4 mm, NoG25 = 16.5 ± 0.6 mm) and days since it reached ≥10 mm (G25 = 4.0 ± 0.3 d, NoG25 = 5.8 ± 0.6 d) were greater for the NoG25 than G25 treatment. For cows with a CL at NPD, CL regression after NPD, ovulation after TAI, and ovulatory follicle diameter did not differ. In conclusion, removing the first GnRH of a modified Resynch-25 protocol for cows with a CL at NPD and a modified Ovsynch protocol with P4 supplementation for cows without a CL at NPD resulted in a greater percentage of cows re-inseminated at detected estrus and a similar proportion of cows pregnant in spite of reduced P/AI for cows with a CL at NPD.     

Luteolysis,progesterone, and pregnancy per insemination after modifying the standard 7-day Ovsynch program in Holstein-Friesian and Holstein cows

Two experiments were conducted with Holstein-Friesian cows in the Republic of North Macedonia and with Holstein cows in Kansas. We hypothesized that 1 dose of PGF_2α administered on d 8 (Ov-8×1) instead of d 7 (Ov-7×1) in an Ovsynch program [GnRH-1 (d 0)–7 d–PGF_2α–56 h–GnRH-2–16 h–timed artificial insemination (AI)] would increase the proportion of cows with complete luteolysis compared with controls receiving a single dose on d 7. Cows were treated with Ov-7×1 or with Ov-8×1 in experiment 1 (n = 347), using only a single dose of PGF_2α. In experiment 2 (n = 452), a third treatment was added (Ov-7×2), in which a second dose of PGF_2α was administered on d 8. Progesterone was measured in blood samples collected before the first or only PGF_2α administration and 72 h later before insemination. Complete luteolysis was defined as having occurred when progesterone was ≥1 ng/mL before PGF_2α and ≤0.3 ng/mL 72 h later (time of AI). Follicles and luteal structures were mapped before GnRH-1 and PGF_2α administrations. The results of experiment 1 demonstrated a greater percentage of multiparous cows in OV-8×1 having complete luteal regression compared with multiparous Ov-7×1 cows, whereas treatments were equally effective in primiparous cows, as reflected in the concentrations of progesterone before AI. Furthermore, pregnancy per AI did not differ between treatments. Results in experiment 2 revealed that 99.3% of cows in the Ov-7×2 treatment receiving the second dose of PGF_2α had complete luteolysis, regardless of parity, compared with significantly fewer cows in the Ov-7×1 and Ov-8×1 treatments (91.2 and 90.6%, respectively). Neither concentrations of progesterone, which averaged <0.4 ng/mL at AI, nor pregnancy per AI differed among the 3 treatments. In both experiments, when status of luteal function before PGF_2α treatment was examined [cows with no corpus luteum (CL) before GnRH-1 but which had formed a new CL in response to ovulation after GnRH-1; cows with an older CL (the same CL that was detected before GnRH-1); or cows with both a new and an older CL], treatments did not differ in causing complete luteolysis. Furthermore, complete luteolysis in experiment 2 did not differ regardless of whether cows had 1, 2, or 3 or more CL before PGF_2α administration. Pregnancy per AI did not differ among treatments, indicating that any of the 3 treatments might produce similar pregnancy outcomes with the flexibility of applying either of the 7- or the 8-d treatments.     

Immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone in dairy cattle: Antibody titers,ovarian function,hormonal levels,and reversibility

Suppression of cyclic activity in cattle is often desired in alpine farming and for feedlot cattle not intended for breeding. A cattle-specific anti-GnRH vaccination (Bopriva, Zoetis Australia Ltd., West Ryde, Australia) is approved for use in heifers and bulls in New Zealand, Australia, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Turkey, and Peru. Eleven healthy, cyclic Swiss Fleckvieh cows were included in the study and vaccinated twice with Bopriva 4 wk apart. Injection site, rectal body temperature, and heart and respiratory rates were recorded before and 3 d following each vaccination. Blood samples were taken weekly for progesterone and estrogen analysis and to determine GnRH antibody titer. Ovaries were examined weekly, using ultrasound to count the number of follicles and identify the presence of a corpus luteum. Thirty weeks after the first vaccination, the cows were subjected to a controlled internal drug-releasing device-based Select-Synch treatment. The GnRH antibody titers increased after the second vaccination and peaked 2 wk later. Estrogen levels were not influenced by vaccination, and progesterone level decreased in 7 of 11 cows up to 3 wk after the second vaccination and remained low for 10 to 15 wk following the second vaccination. The number of class I follicles (diameter ≤5 mm) was not influenced by vaccination, whereas the number of class II follicles (diameter 6–9 mm) decreased between 7 and 16 wk after the first vaccination. Class III follicles (diameter >9 mm) were totally absent during this period in most cows. The median period until recurrence of class III follicles was 78 d from the day of the second vaccination (95% confidence interval: 60–92 d). After vaccination, all cows showed swelling and pain at the injection site, and these reactions subsided within 2 wk. Body temperature and heart and respiratory rates increased after the first and second vaccinations and returned to normal values within 2 d of each vaccination. The cows in our study were not observed to display estrus behavior until 30 wk after the first vaccination. Therefore, a Select-Synch protocol was initiated at that time. Ten cows became pregnant after the first insemination (the remaining cow was reinseminated once until confirmed pregnancy). Bopriva induced a reliable and reversible suppression of reproductive cyclicity for more than 2 mo. The best practical predictor for the length of the anestrus period was the absence of class III follicles.     

Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone at initiation of the 5-d timed artificial insemination (AI) program and timing of induction of ovulation relative to AI on ovarian dynamics and fertility of dairy heifers

Two experiments evaluated the effects of the first GnRH injection of the 5-d timed artificial insemination (AI) program on ovarian responses and pregnancy per AI (P/AI), and the effect of timing of the final GnRH to induce ovulation relative to AI on P/AI. In experiment 1, 605 Holstein heifers were synchronized for their second insemination and assigned randomly to receive GnRH on study d 0 (n = 298) or to remain as untreated controls (n = 307). Ovaries were scanned on study d 0 and 5. All heifers received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone on d 0, a single injection of PGF_2α and removal of the CIDR on d 5, and GnRH concurrent with timed AI on d 8. Blood was analyzed for progesterone at AI. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 32 and 60 after AI. Ovulation on study d 0 was greater for GnRH than control (35.4 vs. 10.6%). Presence of a new corpus luteum (CL) at PGF_2α injection was greater for GnRH than for control (43.1 vs. 20.8%), although the proportion of heifers with a CL at PGF_2α did not differ between treatments and averaged 87.1%. Progesterone on the day of AI was greater for GnRH than control (0.50 ± 0.07 vs. 0.28 ± 0.07 ng/mL). The proportion of heifers at AI with progesterone <0.5 ng/mL was less for GnRH than for control (73.8 vs. 88.2%). The proportion of heifers in estrus at AI did not differ between treatments and averaged 66.8%. Pregnancy per AI was not affected by treatment at d 32 or 60 (GnRH = 52.5 and 49.8% vs. control = 54.1 and 50.0%), and pregnancy loss averaged 6.0%. Responses to GnRH were not influenced by ovarian status on study d 0. In experiment 2, 1,295 heifers were synchronized for their first insemination and assigned randomly to receive a CIDR on d 0, PGF_2α and removal of the CIDR on d 5, and either GnRH 56 h after PGF_2α and AI 16 h later (OVS56, n = 644) or GnRH concurrent with AI 72 h after PGF_2α (COS72; n = 651). Estrus at AI was greater for COS72 than for OVS56 (61.4 vs. 47.5). Treatment did not affect P/AI on d 32 in heifers displaying signs of estrus at AI, but COS72 improved P/AI compared with OVS56 (55.0 vs. 47.6%) in those not in estrus at AI. Similarly, P/AI on d 60 did not differ between treatments for heifers displaying estrus, but CO S72 improved P/AI compared with OVS56 (53.0 vs. 44.7%) in those not in estrus at AI. Administration of GnRH on the first day of the 5-d timed AI program resulted in low ovulation rate and no improvement in P/AI when heifers received a single PGF_2α injection 5 d later. Moreover, extending the proestrus by delaying the final GnRH from 56 to 72 h concurrent with AI benefited fertility of dairy heifers that did not display signs of estrus at insemination following the 5-d timed AI protocol.     

Effects of resynchronization programs on pregnancy per artificial insemination, progesterone, and pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in plasma of lactating dairy cows

Objectives were to develop a timed artificial insemination (TAI) resynchronization program to improve pregnancy per AI and to evaluate responses of circulating progesterone and pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in lactating cows. Cows (n = 1,578) were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF_2α, given 14 d apart starting on d 45 ± 3 postpartum, followed by Ovsynch [2 injections of GnRH 7 d before and 56 h after injection of PGF_2α, TAI 16 h after second injection (d 0)]. The Resynch-treated cows received an intravaginal progesterone insert from d 18 to 25, GnRH on d 25, and pregnancy diagnosis on d 32, and nonpregnant cows received PGF_2α., GnRH 56 h later, and TAI 16 h later (d 35). The control cows were diagnosed for pregnancy on d 32 and nonpregnant cows received GnRH, PGF_2α 39 d after TAI, GnRH 56 h later, and TAI 16 h later (d 42). Pregnancy was reconfirmed on d 60 after AI. Ovarian structures were examined in a subset of cows at the time of GnRH and PGF_2α injections. Blood samples for analyses of progesterone and pregnancy-associated glycoproteins were collected every 2 d from d 18 to 30 in 100 cows, and collection continued weekly to d 60 for pregnant cows (n = 43). Preenrollment pregnancies per AI on d 32 did not differ for cows subsequently treated as Resynch (45.8%, n = 814) and control (45.9%, n = 764), and pregnancy losses on d 60 were 6.7 and 4.0%, respectively. Resynchronized service pregnancy per AI (36%, n = 441; 39.5%, n = 412) and pregnancy losses (6.3 and 6.7%) did not differ for Resynch and control treatments, respectively. Days open for pregnant cows after 2 TAI were less for the Resynch treatment than for the control treatment (96.2 ± 0.82 vs. 99.5 ± 0.83 d). Cows in the Resynch treatment had more large follicles at the time of GnRH. The number of corpora lutea did not differ between treatments at the time of PGF_2α. Plasma progesterone for pregnant cows was greater for Resynch cows than for control cows (18-60 d; 6.6 vs. 5.3 ng/mL), and plasma concentrations of progesterone on d 18 were greater for pregnant cows than for nonpregnant cows (5.3 vs. 4.3 ng/mL). Plasma pregnancy-associated glycoproteins during pregnancy were lower for cows in the Resynch treatment compared with control cows on d 39 (2.8 vs. 4.1 ng/mL) and 46 (1.3 vs. 3.0 ng/mL). Cows pregnant on d 32 that lost pregnancy by d 60 (n = 7) had lower plasma concentrations of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins on d 30 than cows that maintained pregnancy (n = 36; 2.9 vs. 5.0 ng/mL). Pregnancy-associated glycoproteins on d 30 (>0.33 ng/mL) were predictive of a positive d 32 pregnancy diagnosis (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 90.6%). In conclusion, Resynch and control protocols had comparable pregnancy per AI for first and second TAI services, but pregnancy occurred 3.2 d earlier in the Resynch group because inseminations in the Resynch treatment began 7 d before those in the control treatment. Administration of an intravaginal progesterone insert, or GnRH, or both increased progesterone during pregnancy. Dynamics of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins were indicative of pregnancy status and pregnancy loss.     

Resynchronization strategies to improve fertility in lactating dairy cows utilizing a presynchronization injection of GnRH or supplemental progesterone: I. Pregnancy rates and ovarian responses

Objectives were to evaluate 3 resynchronization protocols for lactating dairy cows. At 32 ± 3 d after pre-enrollment artificial insemination (AI; study d −7), 1 wk before pregnancy diagnosis, cows from 2 farms were enrolled and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 resynchronization protocols after balancing for parity, days in milk, and number of previous AI. All cows were examined for pregnancy at 39 ± 3 d after pre-enrollment AI (study d 0). Cows enrolled as controls (n = 386) diagnosed not pregnant were submitted to a resynchronization protocol (d 0-GnRH, d 7-PGF_2α, and d 10-GnRH and AI) on the same day. Cows enrolled in the GGPG (GnRH-GnRH-PGF_2α-GnRH) treatment (n = 357) received a GnRH injection at enrollment (d −7) and if diagnosed not pregnant were submitted to the resynchronization protocol for control cows on d 0. Cows enrolled in CIDR treatment (n = 316) diagnosed not pregnant received the resynchronization protocol described for control cows with addition of a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone (P₄) from d 0 to 7. In a subgroup of cows, ovaries were scanned and blood was sampled for P₄ concentration on d 0 and 7. After resynchronized AI, cows were diagnosed for pregnancy at 39 ± 3 and 67 ± 3 d (California herds) or 120 ± 3 d (Arizona herds). Cows in the GGPG treatment had more corpora lutea than CIDR and control cows on d 0 (1.30 ± 0.11, 1.05 ± 0.11, and 1.05 ± 0.11, respectively) and d 7 (1.41 ± 0.14, 0.97 ± 0.13, and 1.03 ± 0.14, respectively). A greater percentage of GGPG cows ovulated to GnRH given on d 0 compared with CIDR and control cows (48.4, 29.6, and 36.6%, respectively), but CIDR and control did not differ. At 39 ± 3 d after resynchronized AI, pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was increased in GGPG (33.6%) and CIDR (31.3%) cows compared with control (24.6%) cows. At 67 or 120 ± 3 d after resynchronized AI, P/AI of GGPG and CIDR cows was increased compared with control cows (31.2, 29.5, and 22.1%, respectively). Presynchronizing the estrous cycle of lactating dairy cows with a GnRH 7 d before the start of the resynchronization protocol or use of a CIDR insert within the resynchronization protocol resulted in greater P/AI after resynchronized AI compared with control cows.