共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
针对国内传统水泥土搅拌桩存在的缺陷,介绍了变径双向水泥土搅拌桩技术,并对其施工机械和施工工艺进行说明。为了验证变径双向水泥土搅拌桩的软土地基加固效果,通过现场试验和理论分析,分别就上部桩体扩径(钉形搅拌桩)和中部桩体扩径(中字形搅拌桩)这两种典型搅拌桩桩型的搅拌均匀性、桩身强度与承载力、路堤荷载下复合地基工作性状以及工程经济性等与试验段内的常规搅拌桩进行对比。试验结果表明,由于采用了变径和双向搅拌工艺,消除了溢浆现象,保证了桩身水泥掺入量,提高了桩身均匀性、强度及承载力;在路堤荷载作用下,采用变径搅拌桩可比常规搅拌桩节约近15%的水泥用量。 相似文献
2.
3.
钉形水泥土双向搅拌桩作为一种新的地基处理的技术,其承载特性不同于常规水泥土搅拌桩,适宜处理深厚软土地基,文章重点介绍了钉形水泥土双向搅拌桩在某工程地基加固上的应用,对其进行取芯和加固地基承载力的质量检测,其加固效果难以达到设计要求。通过对荷载传递,桩身强度,淤泥含水量等方面分析,找出问题的原因。 相似文献
4.
为了有效处理软土层位于中间的多层软弱地基,开发了中间桩体直径扩大的变径双向水泥土搅拌桩,并通过现场试桩施工及检测,介绍了变径双向水泥土搅拌桩的施工原理、机械设备、施工工艺和桩身质量检测结果。现场试桩结果表明所提的变径水泥土搅拌桩施工工艺是合适的,能形成中间截面扩大的新型搅拌桩。由于采用了双向搅拌工艺,保证了水泥掺量,提高了搅拌均匀性,变径双向水泥土搅拌桩的桩身强度大大高于常规水泥土搅拌桩。变径双向水泥土搅拌桩的研发丰富了水泥土搅拌桩处理软弱地基的形式,能经济、有效地对中间软土层的多层地基进行针对性地的处理,具有很好的应用前景。 相似文献
5.
钉形水泥土双向搅拌桩施工技术及应用 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
分析了常规水泥土搅拌桩产生桩身质量问题的原因,介绍了钉形水泥土双向搅拌桩施工机械、成桩原理及施工工艺。通过钉形水泥土双向搅拌桩在高速公路软土地基处理中的应用实例,表明该工艺成桩质量均匀,解决了常规水泥土搅拌桩身上部强度高、下部强度低的不均匀问题。 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
针对砼芯水泥土搅拌桩复合地基处理高速公路深厚软土段的工程实例,通过地表沉降、分层沉降、深层水平位移、砼芯荷载以及桩土应力比测试,讨论了砼芯水泥土搅拌桩处理深厚软土地基的加固效果,荷载分布和传递规律。测试结果表明:砼芯水泥土搅拌桩对于路基沉降和水平位移控制效果优于水泥土搅拌桩,且横断面差异沉降较小。复合地基的主要压缩量发生在桩顶至砼芯底端一定范围的土体内,沉降发生深度由砼芯控制。砼芯水泥土搅拌桩上部出现负摩阻力,中性点位于砼芯1/3长度处。桩土应力比为水泥土搅拌的2~3倍,与刚性桩相近,桩体承担大部分路堤荷载。砼芯水泥土搅拌桩复合地基排水通畅,超静孔隙水压力消散迅速。路堤荷载下砼芯水泥土搅拌桩工作特性与载荷板试验下的测试结果有所不同。最后从沉降和承载力控制角度给出了砼芯水泥土搅拌桩复合地基的设计方法 相似文献
9.
《建设科技(建设部)》2017,(9)
为进一步研究双向水泥土搅拌桩的加固效果以及促进该工艺的推广应用,在连盐高速铁路的软基处理中应用双向搅拌粉喷桩技术。文章分析了搅拌桩的成桩质量、单桩承载力和路堤荷载作用下的工作性状特点。现场检测结果表明,双向搅拌粉喷桩桩身质量比较均匀,成桩质量较好,体现了双向搅拌粉喷桩的优越性,能够有效控制软土地基沉降和水平位移,满足工程设计要求,值得推广和应用。 相似文献
10.
变径水泥土搅拌桩处理软土地基的应用研究 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
本文介绍了变径水泥土搅拌桩作为一种新型的地基处理方式在高速公路软基处理中的应用情况,并对其施工机械和施工工艺进行说明。通过现场试验和理论分析,分别从桩身强度、承栽力及工程经济等方面与同标段的常规水泥土搅拌桩进行了比较。结果表明,通过对常规水泥土搅拌桩机械设备的改造,采用了双向搅拌的施工工艺,从而保证了桩身的水泥掺入量,提高了桩身强度;变截面的设计使得扩大头部分的面积置换率得到提高,有利于提高单桩和复合地基的承载力;同时,相对节约了工程成本,经济效益较明显。 相似文献
11.
12.
路堤下钉形搅拌桩复合地基性状的数值分析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
针对国内水泥土搅拌桩存在的问题,介绍一种新型水泥土搅拌桩——钉形搅拌桩,在现场试验的基础上通过三维数值模拟对路堤荷载下钉形搅拌桩和常规搅拌桩复合地基的工作性状进行对比分析,结果表明:在其他条件相同的情况下,由于钉形搅拌桩的扩大头作用,钉形搅拌桩的桩体荷载分担比高于常规搅拌桩,而相同深度加固区上部的桩身负摩阻力小于常规搅拌桩;钉形搅拌桩复合地基加固区上部的土体附加应力小于常规搅拌桩复合地基;与常规搅拌桩相比,钉形搅拌桩不仅能有效减小复合地基地表桩、土沉降、坡角侧向位移,更重要的是可以有效减小地表桩土差异沉降,防止发生桩顶向上刺入破坏,不需在顶部设置加筋及垫层。 相似文献
13.
14.
《Soils and Foundations》2019,59(6):2206-2219
Soil-cement columns are widely used to improve soft ground, and the bearing capacity of the formed composite ground is a key design parameter. The currently employed design method was developed for composite grounds under rigid footings, whilst the bearing capacity behavior of composite grounds under earth fills with different degrees of stiffness has rarely been investigated. Hence, the present study attempts to fill this gap. In this investigation, 1-g laboratory model tests are conducted to compare the bearing capacity behavior of composite grounds under a rigid footing and under embankment fill, based on which a numerical model that can capture the strain-softening behavior of soil-cement columns is established. The calibrated numerical model is further employed to perform 144 analyses. The results indicate that the failure mode of composite grounds differs for different types of earth fills: soil failure occurs prior to column failure under soft clay and dredged slurry, whereas column failure is the primary failure mode for composite grounds under embankment fill. This difference in failure mode of composite grounds can be explained using soil arching theories. For different failure modes, different bearing capacity efficiency factors should be used in design. 相似文献
15.
以新建塔然高勒煤矿铁路专用线工程为例,介绍了双向水泥土搅拌桩复合地基,通过现场搅拌桩单桩复合地基静载试验,确定复合地基承载力,验证地基处理效果,并对该种地基处理方法进行评述,为双向水泥土搅拌桩在铁路专用线软弱土地基工程中的应用积累了经验。 相似文献
16.
17.
Deep mixing columns are commonly employed for soft ground improvement. However, the diameter of a single conventional column is a constant and the area replacement ratio does not vary with depth. Hence, the conventional column is not the ideal solution for multi-layered soft grounds, where different layers have remarkably different soil properties. Accordingly, this study proposes a better solution, which is the variable-diameter deep mixing column with a large diameter in the soil layer having high compressibility and a small diameter in the soil layer having relatively low compressibility. In this study, small-scale laboratory model tests were firstly employed to compare the performance of two-layered soft grounds improved by a variable-diameter column and a conventional column. The additional vertical stress in the soil and the column, the excess pore water pressure, and the ground settlement were analyzed. Then, a field application of variable-diameter columns for multi-layered soft ground improvement was presented; the design considerations, column installation, and monitored settlement were introduced and analyzed. The results indicated that the additional stress in the soil and the column in the highly compressible soil layer were much lower in the variable-diameter column-improved ground than in the conventional column-improved ground. Consequently, the variable-diameter column-improved ground yielded less total settlement and less post-construction settlement compared to the conventional column-improved ground. 相似文献