Pile Spacing Effects on Lateral Pile Group Behavior: Load Tests

To investigate group interaction effects as a function of pile spacing, full-scale cyclic lateral load tests were performed on pile groups in stiff clay spaced at 3.3, 4.4, and 5.65 pile diameters in the direction of loading with as many as five rows of piles. Group interaction effects decreased considerably as pile spacing increased from 3.3 to 5.65D. Lateral resistance was a function of row location in the group, rather than location within a row. For a given deflection, the leading (first) row piles carried the greatest load, while the second and third row piles carried successively smaller loads. Fourth and fifth row piles carried about the same load as the third row piles. For a given load, the maximum bending moments in the trailing row piles were greater than those in the lead row, but these effects decreased as spacing increased. Cyclic loading reduced the peak load by about 15% after 15 cycles; however, distribution of load within the pile group was essentially the same as at the peak load. Gaps significantly reduced resistance for small deflections.     

Pile Spacing Effects on Lateral Pile Group Behavior: Analysis

Using the results from three full-scale lateral pile group load tests in stiff clay with spacing ranging from 3.3 to 5.65, computer analyses were performed to back-calculate p multipliers. The p multipliers, which account for reduced resistance due to pile–soil–pile interaction, increased as pile spacing increased from 3.3 to 5.65 diameters. Extrapolation of the test results suggests that group reduction effects can be neglected for spacings greater than about 6.5 for leading row piles and 7–8 diameters for trailing row piles. Based on analysis of the full-scale test results, pile behavior can be grouped into three general categories, namely: (1) first or front row piles; (2) second row piles; and (3) third and higher row piles. p multiplier versus normalized pile spacing curves were developed for each category. The proposed curves yield p multipliers which are higher than those previously recommended by AASHTO in 2000, the US Army in 1993, and the US Navy in 1982 based on limited test data, but lower values than those proposed by Reese et al. in 1996 and Reese and Van Impe in 2001. The response (load versus deflection, maximum moment versus load, and bending moment versus depth) for each row of the pile groups computed using GROUP and Florida Pier generally correlated very well with measurements from the full-scale tests when the p multipliers developed from this test program were employed.     

Centrifuge Modeling of Large-Diameter Bored Pile Groups with Defects

In this research, centrifuge model pile-load tests were carried out to failure to investigate the behavior of large-diameter bored pile groups with defects. The model piles represented cast-in-place concrete piles 2.0?m in diameter and 15?m in length. Two series of static loading tests were performed. The first series of tests simulated the performance of a pile founded on rock and a pile with a soft toe. The second series of tests simulated the performance of three 2×2 pile groups: One reference group without defects, one group containing soft toes, and one group with two shorter piles not founded on rock. The presence of soft toes and shorter piles in the defective pile groups considerably reduced the pile group stiffness and capacity. As the defective piles were less stiff than the piles without defects, the settlements of the individual piles in the two defective pile groups were different. As a result, the applied load was largely shared by the piles without defects, and the defective pile groups tilted significantly. The rotation of the defective pile groups caused large bending moments to develop in the group piles and the pile caps. When the applied load was large, bending failure mechanisms were induced even though the applied load was vertical and concentric. The test results confirm findings from numerical analyses in the literature.     

Group Interaction Effects on Laterally Loaded Piles in Clay

This paper presents the results of static lateral load tests carried out on 1×2, 2×2, 1×4, and 3×3 model pile groups embedded in soft clay. Tests were carried out on piles with length to diameter ratios of 15, 30, and 40 and three to nine pile diameter spacing. The effects of pile spacing, number of piles, embedment length, and configuration on pile-group interaction were investigated. Group efficiency, critical spacing, and p multipliers were evaluated from the experimental study. The experimental results have been compared with those obtained from the program GROUP. It has been found that the lateral capacity of piles in 3×3 group at three diameter spacing is about 40% less than that of the single pile. Group interaction causes 20% increase in the maximum bending moment in piles of the groups with three diameter spacing in comparison to the single pile. Results indicate substantial difference in p multipliers of the corresponding rows of the linear and square pile groups. The predicted field group behavior is in good agreement with the actual field test results reported in the literature.     

Numerical Analysis of Laterally Loaded 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 Pile Groups in Sands

The coupled bridge foundation-superstructure finite-element code FLPIER was employed to predict the lateral response of the single piles and 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 pile groups founded in both loose and medium dense sands. The p-multiplier factors suggested by McVay et al. for laterally loaded pile groups with multiple pile rows were implemented for the predictions. The soil parameters were obtained through a back-analysis procedure based on single pile test results. The latter, as well as the numerical predictions of both the single and group tests, are presented. It was found that the numerical code FLPIER did an excellent job of predicting the response of both the single piles and the 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 pile groups. The latter involved the predictions of lateral load versus lateral deflection of the group, the shears and bending moments developed in the individual piles, and the distributions of the lateral loads in each pile row, which were all in good agreement with the measured results.     

Behavior of Pile Groups Subject to Excavation-Induced Soil Movement in Very Soft Clay

A series of centrifuge model tests was conducted to investigate the behavior of pile groups of various sizes and configurations behind a retaining wall in very soft clay. With a 1.2-m excavation in front of the wall, which may simulate the initial stage of an excavation prior to strutting, the test results reveal that the induced bending moment on an individual pile in a free-head pile group is always smaller than that on a corresponding single pile located at the same distance behind the wall. This is attributed to the shadowing and reinforcing effects of other piles within the group. The degree of shadowing experienced by a pile depends on its relative position in the pile group. With a capped-head pile group, the individual piles are forced to interact in unison though subjected to different magnitudes of soil movement. Thus, despite being subjected to a larger soil movement, the induced bending moment on the front piles is moderated by the rear piles through the pile cap. A finite element program developed at the National University of Singapore is employed to back-analyze the centrifuge test data. The program gives a reasonably good prediction of the induced pile bending moments provided an appropriate modification factor is applied for the free-field soil movement and the amount of restraint provided by the pile cap is properly accounted for. The modification factor applied to the free-field soil movement accounts the reinforcing effect of the piles on the soil movement.     

Centrifuge Modeling of Torsionally Loaded Pile Groups

This paper reports a series of centrifuge model tests on torsionally loaded 1×2, 2×2, and 3×3 pile groups in sand. The objectives of the paper are to investigate: (1) the response of the pile groups subjected to torsion; (2) the way in which the applied torque is transferred in the pile groups; (3) the internal forces mobilized in these torsionally loaded pile groups and their contributions to resist the applied torque; and (4) the influence factors that affect the load transfer, such as soil density and pile-cap connection. In these model tests, the group torsional resistances of the pile groups increased monotonically in the test range of twist angles up to 8°. Both torsional and lateral resistances of the individual piles were simultaneously mobilized to resist the applied torque. The torsional resistances were substantially mobilized at small twist angles, while the lateral resistances kept increasing in the whole range of twist angles. Thus, the contribution of the torsional resistances to the applied torque decreased at large twist angles. The piles at different locations in a pile group could develop not only different horizontal displacements, but also different pile–soil–pile interactions and load–deformation coupling effect, hence, the torsional and lateral resistances of the piles are a function of pile location. The soil density had a more significant effect on the torsional resistances than on the lateral resistances of the group piles.     

Simplified Lateral Load Analyses of Fixed-Head Piles and Pile Groups

The characteristic load method (CLM) can be used to estimate lateral deflections and maximum bending moments in single fixed-head piles under lateral load. However, this approach is limited to cases where the lateral load on the pile top is applied at the ground surface. When the pile top is embedded, as in most piles that are capped, the additional embedment results in an increased lateral resistance. A simple approach to account for embedment effects in the CLM is presented for single fixed-head piles. In practice, fixed-head piles are more typically used in groups where the response of an individual pile can be influenced through the adjacent soil by the response of other nearby piles. This pile–soil–pile interaction results in larger deflections and moments in pile groups for the same load per pile compared to single piles. A simplified procedure to estimate group deflections and moments was also developed based on the p-multiplier approach. Group amplification factors are introduced to amplify the single pile deflection and bending moment to reflect pile–soil–pile interaction. The resulting approach lends itself well to simple spreadsheet computations and provides good agreement with other generally accepted analytical tools and with values measured in published lateral load tests on groups of fixed-head piles.     

Behavior of Pile Groups Subject to Excavation-Induced Soil Movement

Centrifuge model tests have been conducted on free-head and capped-head pile groups consisting of two, four, and six piles located adjacent to an unstrutted deep excavation in sand. It is found that when two free- or capped-head piles are arranged in a row parallel to the retaining wall, the interaction effect between piles is insignificant. When two piles are arranged in a line perpendicular to the wall, the existence of a front pile would reduce the detrimental effect of excavation-induced soiled movement on the rear pile. In addition, the provision of a pile cap for two piles arranged in a line would exert a significant influence on the behavior of the pile group. For free-head four- or six-pile groups, the induced bending moment decreases as the number of piles increases. Moreover, the interior piles of the pile group always experience lower bending moments than those of peripheral piles as the latter have more exposure to the excavation-induced soil movement and are thus more adversely affected. For the capped-head four- or six-pile groups, it can be established that the provision of a pile cap would help to moderate the pile-group deflection against soil movement as the rear piles, that are located farther away from the wall and thus less affected by the soil movement, would drag the front piles back.     

Rotational Restraint of Pile Caps during Lateral Loading

A pure fixed-head (zero-rotation) condition at the top of a group of laterally loaded piles is seldom achievable in the field, even when piles are installed in a group that is “rigidly” constrained by a stiff concrete pile cap. Assuming complete fixity during design (zero rotation at the pile head) can result in underestimated values of pile-head deflection, and incorrect estimates of the magnitude and the location of maximum bending moments. A simple and practical approach is presented for estimating the moment restraint that is provided by the pile cap at the top of a pile group. The moment restraint, represented by the rotational restraint coefficient (KMθ), serves as a boundary condition for analyzing groups of laterally loaded piles. Full-scale field tests performed on two pile groups with concrete pile caps show that the proposed method for estimating rotational restraint provides results that are in good agreement with measured field performance.     

Centrifuge Modeling of Ship Impact Loads on Bridge Pile Foundations

Bridges that cross navigable waterways may be affected by accidental ship impacts. To better characterize ship impact loads on bridge pier structures, a comprehensive centrifuge model test program involving 48 ship impact tests was performed on a 2×3 pile group and a 3×3 pile group founded in saturated silty sand. These model tests simulated groups of 2-m-diameter by 31.5-m-long pipe piles. The effects of three factors related to the ship (tonnage, speed, and bow structure) and two factors related to the bridge pier structure (superstructure mass and pile-group size) were investigated through these impact tests. The characteristics of the ship impact load were identified and the mechanism of the ship-bridge collision was analyzed. The test results show that the ship impact load was highly dependent on the ship bow structure and the ship impact speed. The test results were compared with other published data and the AASHTO loads. An empirical equation was suggested to relate the ship impact load to the five influencing factors.     

Behavior of Axially Loaded Pile Groups Driven in Clayey Silt

This paper presents a case history describing measurements made during the installation and load testing of groups of five, closely spaced, precast concrete piles in a soft clay-silt. The test results extend the presently limited set of reported high-quality data for pile groups at field scale and allow assessment of the reliability of existing numerical and analytical predictive approaches. Full scale maintained compression and tension load tests on groups as well as tests on single (reference) piles and an individual test on a pile within a pile group enable the effects of multiple pile installations and interaction between piles under load to be assessed. The results are compared with existing simple methods of pile group analysis and with other case histories reporting results on small pile groups. A simple expression to evaluate pile group stiffness efficiency is proposed.     

Soil–Pile Response to Blast-Induced Lateral Spreading. I: Field Test

Two full-scale experiments using controlled blasting were conducted in the Port of Tokachi on Hokkaido Island, Japan, to assess the behavior of a single pile, a four-pile group, and a nine-pile group subjected to lateral spreading. The test piles were extensively instrumented with strain gauges to measure the distribution of bending moment during lateral spreading which allowed the backcalculation of the loading conditions, as well as the assessment of damage and performance of the piles. Based on the test results, it was concluded that using controlled blasting successfully liquefied the soil, and subsequently induced lateral spreading in the 4–6% surface slope test beds. The free-field soil displacements in the vicinity of the test piles were over 40 cm for both tests. When compared with the results from the single pile case, the effect of pile head restraint from the pile cap improved overall pile performance by decreasing the displacement of the pile groups and lowering the maximum moments in individual piles within each group. Finally, backcalculated soil reactions indicated that the liquefied soil layer imparted insignificant force to the piles. In the companion to this paper (Part II), an assessment of the potential of using the p–y analysis method for single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral spreading is presented.     

Settlement Ratio of Pile Groups in Sandy Soils from Field Load Tests

This note studies settlement ratio, Rs, of pile groups in sandy soils, defined as the ratio of the settlement of a pile group to that of a single pile at the same average load per pile. 31 cases of field pile-group load tests and the corresponding field single-pile load tests were collected for this study. More than one-half of the cases consist of 3-diameter spaced, 9-pile groups. Based on the field test data, statistical analyses of Rs at different load levels were conducted for pile groups with cap-ground contact (PGCs) and pile groups with freestanding caps (PGFs), respectively. The mean of Rs decreases with the load level for both PGCs and PGFs, whereas the coefficient of variation of Rs increases with the load level. The influence of cap-ground contact on Rs does not appear to be significant based on a comparison of the mean Rs values of these PGCs and PGFs. In addition, a comparative study on Rs and group resistance ratio Rr, which is defined as the ratio of the average resistance of a pile in a group to that of a single pile at the same settlement, was conducted to clarify possible misunderstanding between Rs and pile group efficiency factor η for driven pile groups in sandy soils. The value of Rs compares settlement at the working load and is often larger than unity. The value of η compares failure loads, which occur at different settlements for pile groups and their respective single piles. η is usually larger than unity due to soil densification and additional contributions from the cap-ground contact for PGCs.     

Lateral Behavior of Vertical Pile Group Embedded in Stabilized Earth Slope

An experimental study of the lateral behavior of vertical pile groups embedded in reinforced and nonreinforced sandy earth slopes was carried out. The model tests include studies of group configurations, pile spacing, embedment length of pile, relative densities of sand, and location of pile groups relative to the slope crest. Several configurations of geogrid reinforcement with different lengths, widths, and number of layers were used to reinforce a sandy slope of 1 (V): 1.5 (H). Pile groups of 2×2 and 3×3 along with center-to-center pile spacing of 2D, 3D, and 4.5D and piles with embedment length to diameter ratios of L/D = 12 and 22 were considered. Based on test results, geogrid parameters that give the maximum lateral capacity improvement are presented and discussed.     

Development of Downdrag on Piles and Pile Groups in Consolidating Soil

Development of pile settlement (downdrag) of piles constructed in consolidating soil may lead to serious pile foundation design problems. The investigation of downdrag has attracted far less attention than the study of dragload over the years. In this paper, several series of two-dimensional axisymmetric and three-dimensional numerical parametric analyses were conducted to study the behavior of single piles and piles in 3×3 and 5×5 pile groups in consolidating soil. Both elastic no-slip and elasto-plastic slip at the pile–soil interface were considered. For a single pile, the downdrag computed from the no-slip elastic analysis and from the analytical elastic solution was about 8–14 times larger than that computed from the elasto-plastic slip analysis. The softer the consolidating clay, the greater the difference between the no-slip elastic and the elasto-plastic slip analyses. For the 5×5 pile group at 2.5 diameter spacing, the maximum downdrag of the center, inner, and corner piles was, respectively, 63, 68, and 79% of the maximum downdrag of the single pile. The reduction of downdrag inside the pile group is attributed to the shielding effects on the inner piles by the outer piles. The relative reduction in downdrag (Wr) in the 5×5 pile group increases with an increase in the relative bearing stiffness ratio (Eb/Ec), depending on the pile location in the group. Compared with the relative reduction in dragload (Pr), Wr at the corner pile is less affected by the group interaction for a given surcharge load. This suggests that the use of sacrificing piles outside the pile group will be more effective on Pr than on Wr. Based on the three cases studied, the larger the number of piles in a group, the greater the shielding effects on Wr. Relatively speaking, Wr is more sensitive to the total number of piles than to the pile spacing within a pile group.     

Behavior of Slender Piles Subject to Free-Field Lateral Soil Movement

Soil movements associated with slope instability induce shear forces and bending moments in stabilizing piles that vary with the buildup of passive pile resistance. For such free-field lateral soil movements, stress development along the pile element is a function of the relative displacement between the soil and the pile. To investigate the effects of relative soil-pile displacement on pile response, large-scale load tests were performed on relatively slender, drilled, composite pile elements (cementitious grout with centered steel reinforcing bar). The piles were installed through a shear box into stable soil and then loaded by lateral translation of the shear box. The load tests included two pile diameters (nominal 115 and 178?mm) and three cohesive soil types (loess, glacial till, and weathered shale). Instrumentation indicated the relative soil-pile displacements and the pile response to the loads that developed along the piles. Using the experimental results, an analysis approach was evaluated using soil p-y curves derived from laboratory undrained shear strength tests. The test piles and analyses helped characterize behavioral stages of the composite pile elements at loads up to pile section failure and also provided a unique dataset to evaluate the lateral response analysis method for its applicability to slender piles.     

Pile Response to Lateral Spreads: Centrifuge Modeling

The paper presents results of eight centrifuge models of vertical single piles and pile groups subjected to earthquake-induced liquefaction and lateral spreading. The centrifuge experiments, conducted in a slightly inclined laminar box subjected to strong in-flight base shaking, simulate a mild, submerged, infinite ground slope containing a 6-m-thick prototype layer of liquefiable Nevada sand having a relative density of 40%. Two- and three-layer soil profiles were used in the models, with a 2-m-thick nonliquefiable stratum placed below, and in some cases also above the liquefiable Nevada sand. The model piles had an effective prototype diameter, d, of 0.6 m. The eight pile models simulated single end-bearing and floating reinforced concrete piles with and without a reinforced concrete pile cap, and two 2×2 end-bearing pile groups. Bending moments were measured by strain gauges placed along the pile models. The base shaking liquefied the sand layer and induced free field permanent lateral ground surface displacements between 0.7 and 0.9 m. In all experiments, the maximum permanent bending moments, Mmax occurred at the boundaries between liquefied and nonliquefied layers; the prototype measured values of Mmax ranged between about 10 and 300 kN?m. In most cases the bending moments first increased and then decreased during the shaking, despite the continued increase in free field displacement, indicating strain softening of the soil around the deep foundation. The largest values of Mmax were associated with single end-bearing piles in the three-layer profile, and the smallest values of Mmax were measured in the end-bearing pile groups in the two-layer profile. The companion paper further analyzes the Mmax measured in the single pile models, and uses them to calibrate two limit equilibrium methods for engineering evaluation of bending moments in the field. These two methods correspond to cases controlled, respectively, by the pressure of liquefied soil, and by the passive pressure of nonliquefied layers on the pile foundation.     

Effect of Soil Permeability on Centrifuge Modeling of Pile Response to Lateral Spreading

This paper presents experimental results and analysis of six model centrifuge experiments conducted on the 150?g-ton Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute centrifuge to investigate the effect of soil permeability on the response of end-bearing single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral spreading. The models were tested in a laminar box and simulate a mild infinite slope with a liquefiable sand layer on top of a nonliquefiable layer. Three fine sand models consisting of a single pile, a 3×1 pile group, and a 2×2 pile group were tested, first using water as pore fluid, and then repeated using a viscous pore fluid, hence simulating two sands of different permeability in the field. The results were dramatically different, with the three tests simulating a low permeability soil developing 3–6 times larger pile head displacements and bending moments at the end of shaking. Deformation observations of colored sand strips, as well as measurements of sustained negative excess pore pressures near the foundations in the “viscous fluid” experiments, indicated that an approximately inverted conical zone of nonliquefied soil had formed in these tests at shallow depths around the foundation, which forced the liquefied soil in the free field to apply its lateral pressure against a much larger effective foundation area. Additional p-y and limit equilibrium back-analyses support the hypothesis that the greatly increased foundation bending response observed when the soil is less pervious is due to the formation of such inverted conical volume of nonliquefied sand. This study provides evidence of the importance of soil permeability on pile foundations response during lateral spreading for cases when the liquefied deposit reaches the ground surface, and suggests that bending response may be greater in silty sands than in clean sands in the field. Moreover, the observations in this study may serve as basis for realistic practical engineering methods to evaluate pile foundations subjected to lateral spreading and pressure of liquefied soil.     

Data Reduction of Horizontal Load Full-Scale Tests on Bored Concrete Piles and Pile Groups

This paper proposes a new approach for data reduction of horizontal load full-scale tests on piles and pile groups. This approach has been developed on results from tests run on bored concrete piles embedded in homogeneous and nonhomogeneous ground. Due to nonlinear response of pile material and also to nonhomogeneous embedding ground, the problem of fitting reliable curves for representing strains along shafts is increased. It is suggested that B-splines fixed by a weighted least-squares algorithm should be used to overcome that problem. Taking advantage of the mathematical properties of B-splines, an algorithm for computing the internal force distribution amongst pile heads direct from test results is also proposed for pile groups. It is shown that the integration of the curvatures to compute pile movements should be done using natural boundary conditions instead of pile head measurements whenever possible. Despite the concrete crack, the distribution of bending moments can be computed from curvatures provided a reliable reinforced concrete model is used. Finally, it is proposed to compute the soil reactions by the integration of bending moments, solving an integral equation by again using B-spline functions.