Phase II trial of docetaxel: a new, highly effective antineoplastic agent in the management of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy (objective response rate and duration of response and survival) and toxicity of docetaxel in patients with strictly defined anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with bidimensionally measurable MBC who had progressive disease while receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were registered onto the phase II trial. Docetaxel was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 over 1 hour every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were assessable for disease response; 18 (53%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 35% to 70%) achieved a partial response. The median times to disease progression and survival duration were 7.5 and 13.5 months, respectively, for responding patients. The median overall survival duration was 9 months. Two hundred eight cycles (median, five) of docetaxel were administered. Neutropenia with less than 500 cells/microL developed in 31 of 35 patients; it was complicated by fever in 30 (14%) of 208 cycles and in 18 (51%) of 35 patients, including one treatment-related death. Fluid retention was seen in 15 (43%) of 35 patients, including pleural effusions in 11 patients (31%). Moderate skin toxicity, asthenia, and myalgia were observed in 16%, 58%, and 37% of cycles, respectively. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel has the highest reported antitumor activity in anthracycline-resistant MBC. High objective response rates were seen in patients with visceral-dominant involvement, multiple metastatic sites, or extensive previous therapy. Docetaxel is associated with severe but reversible neutropenia, asthenia, and cumulative dose-related fluid retention. Dexamethasone decreased the frequency and severity of skin toxicity and appeared to ameliorate fluid retention.     

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in patients with paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel (100 mg/m2) was administered every 3 weeks to 46 patients registered at four centers. Patients had previously received < or = two chemotherapy regimens for MBC. All patients had progressive disease while receiving paclitaxel therapy. Treatment was repeated until there was evidence of disease progression or for a maximum of three cycles after best response. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in eight of 44 assessable patients (18.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7% to 29.5%). Seven patients had partial responses and one patient responded completely. Response rates were not significantly different by previously received paclitaxel dose or resistance. No responses were seen in 12 patients who had previously received paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion, but the response rate in 32 patients who had received paclitaxel by 1- to 3-hour infusion was 25%. The median response duration was 29 weeks and the median time to disease progression was 10 weeks. Median survival was 10.5 months. Clinically significant (severe) adverse events included neutropenic fever (24% of patients), asthenia (22%), infection (13%), stomatitis (9%), neurosensory changes (7%), myalgia (7%), and diarrhea (7%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is active in patients with paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer, particularly in those who failed to respond to brief infusions of paclitaxel. Response rates were comparable to or better than those seen with other therapies for patients with paclitaxel-resistant MBC. This confirms preclinical studies, which indicated only partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel.     

Docetaxel chronopharmacology in mice

Docetaxel tolerance and antitumor efficacy could be enhanced if drug administration was adapted to circadian rhythms. This hypothesis was investigated in seven experiments involving a total of 626 male B6D2F1 mice, synchronized with an alternation of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness (12:12), after i.v. administration of docetaxel. In experiment (Exp) 1, the drug was given once a week (wk) for 6 wks (20 mg/kg/wk) or for 5 wks (30 mg/kg/wk) at one of six circadian times, during light when mice were resting [3, 7, or 11 hours after light onset (HALO)], or during darkness, when mice were active (15, 19, or 23 HALO). Endpoints were survival and body weight change. In Exp 2 and 3, docetaxel (30 mg/kg/wk) was administered twice, 1 wk apart, at one of four circadian stages (7, 11, 19, or 23 HALO). Endpoints were hematological and intestinal toxicities. In Exp 4, circadian changes in cell cycle phase distribution and BCL-2 immunofluorescence were investigated in bone marrow as possible mechanisms of docetaxel tolerability rhythm. In Exp 5 to 7, docetaxel was administered to mice bearing measurable P03 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (270-370 mg), with tumor weight and survival as endpoints. Mice from Exp 5 and 6 received a weekly schedule of docetaxel at one of six circadian stages (20 or 30 mg/kg/wk at 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, or 23 HALO). In Exp 7, docetaxel (30 mg/kg) was given every 2 days (day 1, 3, 5 schedule) at 7, 11, 19, or 23 HALO. Docetaxel dosing in the second half of darkness (19 or 23 HALO) resulted in significantly worse toxicity than its administration during the light span (3, 7, or 11 HALO). The survival rate ranged from 56.3% in the mice treated at 23 HALO to 93.8 or 87.5% in those injected at 3 or 11 HALO, respectively (Exp 1, P < 0.01). Granulocytopenia at nadir was -49 +/- 14% at 7 HALO compared with -84 +/- 3% at 19 HALO (Exp 2 and 3, P < 0.029), and severe jejunal mucosa necrosis occurred in 5 of 8 mice treated at 23 HALO as opposed to 2 of 18 receiving docetaxel at 7, 11, or 19 HALO (Exp 2 and 3, P < 0.02). The time of least docetaxel toxicity corresponded to the circadian nadir in S or G2-M phase and to the circadian maximum in BCL-2 immunofluorescence in bone marrow. Docetaxel increased the median survival of tumor-bearing mice in a dose-dependent manner (controls: 24 days; 20 mg/kg weekly, 33 days; 30 mg/kg weekly or day 1, 3, 5 schedule, 44 or 46 days, respectively; Exp 5-7). Survival curves of treated mice differed significantly according to dosing time for each dose and schedule (P from log rank <0.003 to P < 0.03). In Exp 5 and 6, the percentage of increase in life span was largest if docetaxel was administered weekly at 7 HALO (20 mg/kg, 220%; 30 mg/kg, 372%) and lowest after docetaxel dosing at 19 HALO (80% with 20 mg/kg) or at 15 HALO (78% with 30 mg/kg). In Exp 7, (day 1, 3, 5 schedule), docetaxel was most active at 11 HALO (percentage increase in life span, 390%) and least active at 23 HALO (210%). Docetaxel tolerability and antitumor efficacy were simultaneously enhanced by drug dosing in the light span, when mice were resting. Mechanisms underlying the tolerability rhythm likely involved the circadian organization of cell cycle regulation. Docetaxel therapeutic index may be improved with an administration at night in cancer patients, when fewest bone marrow cells are in S or G2-M phase.     

Hepatitis G virus RNA and hepatitis G virus-E2 antibodies in Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to transfusion history

PURPOSE: Docetaxel is a highly active antineoplastic agent; however, grade IV leukopenia occurs in the large majority of patients treated with a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Recent experience with weekly paclitaxel has demonstrated a bone marrow-sparing effect when a weekly administration schedule is used. We investigated a weekly schedule of docetaxel in an attempt to alter the toxicity profile and improve the therapeutic index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with advanced, refractory malignancy entered this phase I trial between October 1996 and June 1997. Docetaxel was administered weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. Sequential cohorts of patients were treated at the following dose levels: 20, 25, 30, 36, 43, and 52 mg/m2. Patients were reevaluated after one course (8 weeks); patients with objective response or stable disease continued treatment for a maximum of four courses or until disease progression. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed at least one course of therapy. Myelosuppression was not a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at any of the doses tested. Only five episodes of grade III leukopenia occurred (14% of patients, 2% of doses), and no grade IV leukopenia was produced. No grade III or IV thrombocytopenia or anemia was observed. Grade III fatigue and asthenia were observed in all three patients treated at 52 mg/m2/wk and in two of 10 at 43 mg/m2/wk. Other grade III toxicity included acral erythema (n = 1), neuropathy (n = 1), peripheral edema (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). The DLTs of this docetaxel schedule are fatigue and asthenia. Although the maximum-tolerated dose by definition of this study was 43 mg/m2/wk, we selected 36 mg/m2/wk for ongoing phase II studies. CONCLUSION: The toxicity profile of docetaxel is markedly altered when the drug is administered by a weekly schedule. Myelosuppression is mild and uncommon. Fatigue and asthenia are the DLTs; other nonhematologic toxicities, which included peripheral edema and neuropathy, are uncommon, and the arthralgia/myalgia syndrome was not observed. Weekly administration of docetaxel may provide a better tolerated, efficacious use of this drug; further investigation of weekly docetaxel as a single agent and in combination regimens is warranted.     

Phase I trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior chemotherapy and to recommend a dose for phase II studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy received docetaxel over 1 hour followed by cisplatin over 1 hour with hydration. Dose levels studied were (docetaxel/cisplatin) 50/75, 75/75, 75/100, and 100/75 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. Colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support was not used. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and cisplatin were studied in the first cycle of therapy. Most patients (79%) had metastatic disease or intrathoracic recurrence after prior radiation and/or surgery. RESULTS: Of 24 patients entered, all were assessable for toxicity and 18 for response. The MTD schedules were docetaxel 75 mg/m2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] in five of six patients), and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (DLTs in two of two patients, including one fatal toxicity). Limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and nonhematologic, principally diarrhea and renal. Two patients had neutropenic enterocolitis. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were consistent with results from single-agent studies, which suggests no major pharmacokinetic interaction. Neutropenia was related to docetaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). An alternative schedule was investigated, with cisplatin being administered over 3 hours commencing 3 hours after docetaxel, but toxicity did not appear to be less. Independently reviewed responses occurred in eight of 18 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22% to 69%), most following 75 mg/m2 of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour is recommended for phase II studies. The responses seen in this phase I study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated advanced NSCLC.     

Randomized study of paclitaxel-cisplatin versus cisplatin-teniposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

PURPOSE: To compare two cisplatin based chemotherapy schedules in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 332 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 either in combination with teniposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 (arm A) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion on day 1 (arm B); cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were ineligible; patient characteristics were well balanced between the two arms: 71% were male, 71% had less than 5% weight loss, 89% had a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0 to 1, 51% had adenocarcinoma, and 61% had stage IV disease. Hematologic toxicity was significantly more severe in arm A (leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4: 66% v 19%, 83% v 55%, 36% v 2% in arms A and B, respectively), which resulted in more febrile neutropenia (27% v 3% in arms A and B, respectively), dose reductions, and treatment delays. There were a total of nine toxic deaths, six due to neutropenic sepsis: five in arm A and one in arm B. In contrast, arthralgia/myalgia (grade 2 or 3, 4% v 17%), peripheral neurotoxicity (grade 2 or 3, 6% v 29%), and hypersensitivity reactions (1% v 7%, all grades) were significantly more frequent in arm B. The frequency and severity of other toxicities were comparable between the two arms. Responses were one complete and 44 partial on arm A (28%) and two complete and 61 partial (41%) on arm B (P = .018). There was no significant difference in survival, with median and 1-year survivals 9.9 versus 9.7 months and 41% versus 43%, respectively in arm A and B. Progression-free survival was 4.9 and 5.4 months in arm A and B, respectively. Selected centers participated in a quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, which was performed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and LC-13 administered at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter. Arm B achieved a better score at week 6 for emotional, cognitive and social functioning, global health status, fatigue, and appetite loss, which was lost at 12 weeks. In conclusion, arm B appears superior to arm A with regard to response rate, side effects, and QoL. CONCLUSION: Although survival was not improved, arm B offers a better palliation for advanced NSCLC patients than arm A.     

Simultaneous radiochemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized multicenter study

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the contribution of simultaneously administered chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III/IV head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer were treated either with RT alone (arm A) or simultaneous RT plus CT (RCT; arm B). RT was identical in both arms and administered in three courses with 13 fractions of 1.8 Gy each twice daily. During one course, from day 3 to 11, 23.4 Gy was delivered. In arm B, cisplatin (CDDP) 60 mg/m2, fluorouracil (5-FU) 350 mg/m2 by intravenous (i.v.) bolus, and leucovorin (LV) 50 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus were given on day 2, and 5-FU 350 mg/m2/24 hour by continuous infusion and LV 100 mg/m2/24 hours by continuous infusion were given from day 2 to 5. Treatment was repeated on days 22 and 44; a total RT dose of 70.2 Gy was administered. Treatment breaks were scheduled from days 12 to 21 and days 34 to 43. RESULTS: From 1989 to 1993, 298 patients were enrolled and 270 patients were assessable. Acute mucositis grade 3 or 4 was more frequent in arm B (38%) than in arm A (16%) (P < .001). Total treatment time was significantly longer in arm B than in arm A (P < .001) due to prolonged breaks. According to hematologic toxicity, scheduled drug doses were given in 74% of patients for the second course and 46% for the third course. The 3-year overall survival rate was 24% in arm A and 48% in arm B (P < .0003). The 3-year locoregional control rate was 17% in arm A and 36% in arm B (P < .004). Both arms showed similar distant failure patterns (arm A, 13 of 140; arm B, 12 of 130). Serious late side effects were not significantly different between treatment arms (arm A, 6.4%; arm B, 10%; not significant). CONCLUSION: Concomitant CT offered improved disease control and survival in advanced head and neck cancer patients. Due to increased acute toxicity, more supportive care is demanded when CT is given simultaneously. Increased total treatment time does not exert a negative impact on outcome in this combined modality regimen.     

Capillary protein leak syndrome appears to explain fluid retention in cancer patients who receive docetaxel treatment

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to elucidate whether the fluid retention syndrome induced by docetaxel is caused by capillary protein leakage or by other mechanisms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 23 patients) or metastatic head and neck cancer (one patient) were included on this prospective, nonrandomized trial. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was administered every 3 weeks with 5 days of dexamethasone prophylaxis to avoid hypersensitivity reactions and edema formation. Transcapillary forces, ie, colloid osmotic pressure of plasma (COPpl) and interstitial fluid (COPint) and interstitial hydrostatic pressure (Pint), were measured before the start of treatment and after total docetaxel doses of 200 and 500 mg/m2 by means of the well-documented wick and wick-in-needle methods. Body weight, degree of edema, blood pressure, and heart rate and hemoglobin, hematocrit, albumin, and total protein values were registered in parallel. RESULTS: After a total docetaxel dose of 200 mg/m2, COPpl, COPint, and hemoglobin, hematocrit, albumin, and total protein values had decreased significantly; Pint and body weight were unchanged; and only mild edema was observed. These findings suggest a plasma volume increase followed by enhanced fluid filtration to the interstitium. After a cumulative docetaxel dose of 500 mg/m2, the COPpl continued to decrease significantly, but COPint remained unchanged despite a significant increase in mean body weight and edema formation. These observations support the theory of a capillary protein leakage. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel appears to induce an initial enhancement of fluid filtration followed by a capillary protein leakage that leads to edema formation.     

Randomized phase II noncomparative trial of oral and intravenous doxifluridine plus levo-leucovorin in untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Doxifluridine (5-dFUR) is a fluoropyrimidine derivative that has been shown to be active on a variety of solid tumors. The clinical use of intravenous (i.v.) 5-dFUR as a bolus injection or short term infusion has been limited because of its unpredictable severe neurotoxicity. Unlike fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-dFUR is effective when administered orally. METHODS: This randomized, parallel-group, Phase II trial of two schedules of 5-dFUR was conducted between April 1993 and September 1994. A total of 130 previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma were randomized to receive oral levo-leucovorin (1-leucovorin) 25 mg/dose followed by oral 5-dFUR 750 mg/m2 twice daily for 4 days every 12 days (arm A) or i.v. 1-leucovorin 25 mg/dose followed by i.v. 5-dFUR 3000 mg/m2 for 5 days every 21 days (arm B). RESULTS: The two treatment arms were well balanced in terms of age, sex, and disease extension. Metastases were present in more than 90% of the total population, with the liver being the most common site. A median of 7 oral courses (range, 1-15) and 5 intravenous courses (range, 1-9) were administered. Intent-to-treat analysis rate of the randomized patients revealed a response rate of 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-26) in arm A and 41% (95% CI, 29-54) in arm B. However, 7 cases in arm A and 12 in arm B were inadequately treated, and the response rates, according to standard analysis, were respectively 17% (95% CI, 8-28) and 51% (95% CI, 37-65). The median time to treatment failure was 4 months (range, 1-23) and 7 months (range, 1-9), respectively, for the two groups; median survival was 11 months (range, 1-24) in both groups. National Cancer Institute Grade 3 and 4 diarrhea were observed in 25% of the orally treated patients and in 18% of those receiving i.v. treatment. Stomatitis was reported mainly in arm B (15%). Mild and moderate neurotoxicity was observed in 6% of the patients in both arms; no severe neurotoxicity was reported. CONCLUSIONS: 5-dFUR with l-leucovorin, administered either orally or intravenously, produces response rates that are similar to those offered by the regimens containing 5-FU that are usually used to treat advanced colorectal carcinoma. This study documents the good tolerance of the i.v. schedule administered as a 1-hour infusion; furthermore, oral administration seems to be promising and feasible as a home treatment.     

多西他赛与吉西他滨分别顺泊治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and side effects of docetaxel/cisplatin regiment and gemcitabine/cisplatin regiment in the patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Seventy six patients with advanced NSCLC who were chemotherapy-naive were enrolled in two groups. In docetaxel group (DP group) the patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1. In gemcitabine group (GP group) the patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8. The dosage of cisplatin was the same as DP group. The two regiments were administrated intravenously every 21 days as a cycle, each patient received 2-4 cycles. All patients were followed up until disease progressed or patients died. Results: The overall response rates were 43.5% in DP group and 45.9% in GP group. The response rate was significantly different between the initial treated group and retreated group in both two groups (53.8% vs 23.0% in DP group and 56% vs 25% in GP group, P < 0.05, respectively). The main side effects were bone marrow suppression and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion: Docetaxel/cisplatin regiment and gemcitabine/cisplatin regiment for the patients with advanced NSCLC were efficient and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic approachs with low toxicity levels. The efficacy and major toxicity in two groups were similar.     

Preliminary report of the activity of docetaxel in advanced or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the cervix

Eighteen patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix were treated with i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 over 1 h every 21 days. No patient received prior chemotherapy, except as a radiation sensitizer. Median age was 42 years (range 30-58) and Zubrod performance status was 1 (0-2). Ten (59%) patients had prior surgery and 11 (65%) had prior radiation therapy. Sixteen patients were evaluable for response. Two patients had a partial response (13%; 95% CI 0-32%) and eight (50%; 95% CI 23-77%) had stable disease. Dose reduction to 75 mg/m2 was required in 10 patients and to 55 mg/m2 in one patient. Granulocytopenia was the major hematopoietic toxicity (31% grade 3 and 44% grade 4). Docetaxel is active in patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix and may be tolerable at this dose schedule.     

Klinefelter syndrome

BACKGROUND: To determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and therapeutic activity of MTHF-modulated FU using two different administration schedules of the antimetabolite (bolus vs. two-hour infusion), the present randomized study using a 'pick-the-winner' design was undertaken in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with previously untreated advanced measurable colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with MTHF (100 mg/m2 days 1-5 i.v. bolus) plus FU (400 mg/m2 days 1-5) given either as i.v. bolus injection or as a two-hour infusion every four weeks. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, defined as > or = WHO grade 3 hematotoxicity and/or > or = WHO grade 2 nonhematologic side effects) and evidence of progressive disease, the FU dose was escalated by 50 mg/m2/day during each subsequent cycle until the individual maximum tolerable dose (MTD) was reached. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomized to the FU bolus arm and 42 patients to the FU two-hour infusion arm. The median MTD was 475 mg/m2/day (95% CI: 450-500) in the FU bolus arm with stomatitis +/- diarrhea being the most common DLT. Gastrointestinal side effects were also dose-limiting in the two-hour infusion arm; however, the median MTD was 600 mg/m2/day (95% CI: 568-632). Myelosuppression was more pronounced in the FU bolus arm than in the two-hour infusion arm. The overall response rates were 27.5% (95% CI: 15-44%; 1 CR and 10 PR) for patients treated in the bolus arm and 14.5% (95% CI: 5-28%; 1 CR and 5 PR) for those treated in the two-hour infusion arm. Analogous to recorded response, median time to progression (8.5 vs. 6.25) and overall survival time (14.0 vs. 11.0) tended to be superior in the FU bolus arm. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences in tolerable drug dose and toxicity between the two treatment arms might be explained by the administration schedule-dependent clinical pharmacokinetics of FU and/or the difference in extent of biochemical modulation of the antimetabolite through MTHF. The fact that the two regimens were not equitoxic probably also helps to explain the favourable response activity noted in the MTHF/FU bolus arm. Whether MTHF is as effective as leucovorin for biochemical modulation of FU remains to be determined in a randomized trial, for which we would recommend its combined use with bolus FU ('winner arm') using a starting dose of 400 mg/m2/day x5.     

老年乳腺癌术后多西紫杉醇联合环磷酰胺辅助化疗的毒副作用研究

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the side effects of docetaxel with cyclophosphamide as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly breast cancer patients. Methods: Thirty-six operable elderly breast cancer patients at intermediate risk based on the St Gallen risk classi.cation underwent modified radical mastectomy and then were given four cycles of TC regimen (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; every 21 days ). Primary prophylaxis granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 200μg i.h. was administered on day 4-6. Results: The main side effect was neutropenia. Grade 3 neutropenia developed in 36.1% and G4 in 19.4%, respectively. Most of the other side effects were G1-2. Dose reduction occurred in 11.1% patients. The completion rate of chemotherapy was 100%. Conclusion:Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimen with G-CSF primary prophylaxis is tolerable for elderly patients in general good condition.     

High-dosage chemotherapy and the autologous transplantation of peripheral hematopoietic progenitor cells in breast cancer: the initial results, analysis of toxicity and the necessary support means

BACKGROUND: In the last years high dose chemotherapy (HDC) schedules have been developed with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) which are very effective in breast cancer. Expectation has been raised concerning the cure of a subgroup of patients with metastatic breast cancer and the improvement of prognosis in high risk stages II and III. METHODS: CTCb (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin 800 mg/m2) was administered with autologous peripheral hematopoietic progenitor cells transplantation (TACPHP) and granulocytic colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg/day to 27 patients with breast cancer: 9 in stage IV in complete remission, 12 in stage II with > or = 10 affected lymph nodes and 6 in stage III. RESULTS: No toxic deaths were reported. The median time to achieve > or = 0.5 x 10(9) neutrophils/l was 8 days, to > or = 20 x 10(9) platelets/l 9 days and to > or = 50 x 10(9) platelets/l 12 days. Fever was observed in 85% of the patients although its median duration was of only one day. Extrahematologic toxicity was moderate with grade III nausea/vomiting in 48% of patients, grade III mucositis in 22%, grade III hepatitis in 19%, and grade III diarrhea in 4%. No grade IV toxicity was observed. The median follow-up is still short (10 months, range: 2-25). All the patients maintain normal hematologic peripheral blood counts and only 4 (in stage IV) have relapsed. CONCLUSIONS: The slight extrahematologic toxicity observed in the high dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin, and the rapid hematologic recovery provided by the TACPHP and G-CSF allow the above schedule to be administered with moderate toxicity and no mortality. This low toxic profile leads to the possibility of future trials with this chemotherapy schedule in other subgroups of patients with breast cancer.     

Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099

PURPOSE: The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) coordinated an Intergroup study with the participation of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). This randomized phase III trial compared chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiotherapy was administered in both arms: 1.8- to 2.0-Gy/d fractions Monday to Friday for 35 to 39 fractions for a total dose of 70 Gy. The investigational arm received chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 during radiotherapy; postradiotherapy, chemotherapy with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 4 was administered every 4 weeks for three courses. Patients were stratified by tumor stage, nodal stage, performance status, and histology. RESULTS: Of 193 patients registered, 147 (69 radiotherapy and 78 chemoradiotherapy) were eligible for primary analysis for survival and toxicity. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 15 months for eligible patients on the radiotherapy arm and was not reached for the chemo-radiotherapy group. The 3-year PFS rate was 24% versus 69%, respectively (P < .001). The median survival time was 34 months for the radiotherapy group and not reached for the chemo-radiotherapy group, and the 3-year survival rate was 47% versus 78%, respectively (P = .005). One hundred eighty-five patients were included in a secondary analysis for survival. The 3-year survival rate for patients randomized to radiotherapy was 46%, and for the chemoradiotherapy group was 76% (P < .001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that chemoradiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancers with respect to PFS and overall survival.     

Intensive sequential chemotherapy with repeated blood stem-cell support for untreated poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of six ambulatory high-dose sequential chemotherapy courses that include three intensified cycles supported by stem-cell infusion in high-risk and high-intermediate-risk untreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pilot nonrandomized study included 20 untreated patients aged less than 60 years with aggressive histologically identified NHL and two or three adverse-prognosis criteria (International Index). Patients received an ambulatory regimen with high-dose chemotherapy supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and repeated peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) infusion. The median age was 39 years (range, 20 to 59), with 13 men and seven women. Chemotherapy consisted of one cycle every 21 days for a total of six cycles. The first three cycles (A1, A2, and A3) consisted of cyclophosphamide (Cy) 3,000 mg/m2, doxorubicin (Doxo) 75 mg/m2, and vincristine 2 mg (plus corticosteroids). The last three cycles (B4, B5, and B6) consisted of the same drug combination plus etoposide 300 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2. For an expected duration of 18 weeks, the projected dose-intensity was 25 mg/m2/wk for Doxo and 1,000 mg/m2/wk for Cy. G-CSF 300 micrograms was administered from day 6 following each cycle until neutrophil reconstitution. Two aphereses were performed at approximately day 13 after each A cycle, and PBSCs were injected at day 4 of each B cycle. Radiotherapy on tumor masses > or = 5 cm was scheduled after completion of the last cycle. RESULTS: The median duration of grade 4 neutropenia was 1 day (range, 0 to 7) for each A cycle and 4 days (range, 1 to 10) for each B cycle (P = .02). The median duration of grade 4 thrombopenia was 0 days (range, 0 to 8) for each A cycle and 6 days (range, 1 to 21) for each B cycle (P < .001). Hospitalization for febrile neutropenia was required for 18% and 44% of patients during cycles A and B, respectively (P < .01). Only three patients did not complete the protocol: one due to emergency surgery after cycle B4, one who died after cycle B5 from interstitial pneumonia, and one with delayed hematologic reconstitution after cycle B4. Chemotherapy delivery was optimal (median actual relative dose-intensity, 97%; range, 66 to 100). The median total dose administered over 18 weeks was 18,000 mg Cy (range, 12,000 to 18,000), 450 mg Doxo (range, 300 to 450), 900 mg etoposide (range, 300 to 900), and 300 mg cisplatin (range, 100 to 300). Evaluation of response after six courses showed 13 complete remissions ([CRs] 65%), four partial remissions (PRs), two nonresponses (NRs), and one toxic death. With a median follow-up period of 25 months (range, 16 to 43), 15 patients are alive, with 12 in continuous first CR; five patients relapsed (four of four PRs and one of 13 CRs). Two-year survival and failure-free survival (FFS) rates are 73% and 56%, respectively. The disease-free survival (DFS) rate for the CRs is 86%. CONCLUSION: PBSC support contributes to the feasibility of first-line, very-high-dose, ambulatory chemotherapy delivery in poor-risk NHL and is associated with a high rate of remission and FFS.     

First-line treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with docetaxel and vinorelbine

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and vinorelbine are active agents in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy and toxicity of this combination was evaluated in a Phase II study in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Forty-six chemotherapy-naive patients (44 men and 2 women with a median age of 64 years) with NSCLC (11 with Stage IIIB and 35 with Stage IV disease) were entered into the study; the World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 0, 1, and 2 in 32, 11, and 3 patients, respectively. Patients received vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) on Day 1 and docetaxel (100 mg/m2) on Day 2 in cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given to all patients from Day 3 to Day 10. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven courses of chemotherapy were administered. Adverse events included WHO Grade 4 neutropenia (15 patients), Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (3 patients), Grade 3 anemia (2 patients), Grade 2 and 3 neurotoxicity (7 patients and 1 patient, respectively), and Grade 3 fatigue (2 patients). Twenty patients (43%) required hospitalization: 11 (24%) for neutropenic fever (2 deaths from sepsis), and 9 (20%) for nonneutropenic pulmonary infections (2 deaths from cardiopulmonary insufficiency). The median overall survival was 5 months and the 1-year survival was 24%. Four complete responses (9.8%) and 11 partial responses (26.8%) (overall response rate of 36.6%; 95% confidence interval, 21.8-51.3%) were documented in 41 evaluable patients (intent-to-treat: 32.6%). Stable and progressive disease occurred in 13 patients each (31.7%). The median duration of response was 5 months and the median time to progression was 3 months (6 months for the responders). CONCLUSIONS: This schedule of docetaxel and vinorelbine combination is effective but its relatively high incidence of complicated neutropenia precludes its general use in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Randomized phase II study of two schedules of topotecan in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study

PURPOSE: As topotecan is S-phase-specific, its efficacy is likely schedule-dependent. Therefore, a randomized study using a "pick the winner" design was undertaken to compare two schedules in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with no more than two separate regimens of chemotherapy, one of which had to be platinum-containing, were randomized to either topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) over 30 minutes daily for 5 days repeated every 21 days (arm A, the standard arm), or topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion once a week for 4 weeks repeated every 6 weeks (arm B, the experimental arm). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were eligible and 63 were assessable for response. The response rate in arm A was 22.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6% to 41.2%), which was significantly superior to that in arm B, 3.1% (95% CI, 0.1% to 16%) (P = .026). The regimens were not equitoxic, with 94% of patients on arm A experiencing grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia as opposed to 52% on arm B. CONCLUSION: The weekly 24 hour infusion of topotecan at 1.75 mg/m2 was ineffective in relapsed ovarian cancer. The daily-times-five schedule remains the schedule of choice. As the regimens were not equitoxic, one cannot differentiate between an ineffective schedule and an ineffective dose as the reason for the differing response rates. However, the degree of myelotoxicity that already occurs will preclude any substantially higher dosing with the weekly regimen.     

The venotonic drug hydroxyethylrutosiden does not prevent or reduce docetaxel-induced fluid retention: results of a comparative study

PURPOSE: Fluid retention, which includes peripheral edema, ascites, pleural or pericardial effusion, or a combination of these that is sometimes associated with significant weight gain, is one of the most troublesome cumulative side effects of docetaxel. A suggestive observation from the data base available at the manufacturer (Rhone-Poulenc Rorer) was that patients who received venotonic drugs appeared to tolerate more courses of docetaxel. This prompted a comparative study to investigate whether the venotonic drug hydroxyethylrutosiden could reduce or delay docetaxel-related fluid retention. METHODS: A total of 85 patients with metastatic breast cancer who were treated with docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 with corticoid comedication were allocated to receive either 300 mg hydroxyethylrutosiden given orally four times daily (group A) or no hydroxyethylrutosiden (group B). The end point for analysis was the development of fluid retention of > or = grade 2. RESULTS: Fluid retention of > or = grade 2 was reported in 14 of 42 patients (33%) in group A and in 15 of 43 patients (35%) in group B and occurred after a median of 4 cycles of docetaxel in both groups. Weight gain was similar in groups A and B. CONCLUSION: We conclude that hydroxyethylrutosiden does not reduce or delay the incidence and severity of docetaxel-related fluid retention.     

Long-term follow-up of a randomized post-induction therapy trial in acute myelogenous leukemia (a Southeastern Cancer Study Group trial)

A phase III clinical trial was designed to determine if more intensive induction and consolidation therapy for acute myeloblastic leukemia increases the remission rate and prolongs survival. A minor objective was to determine if the use of non-cross resistant drugs was more effective than the same drugs used for induction. Patients with untreated leukemia between the ages of 15 and 50 were given daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 for the first 3 days of a 10-day continuous infusion of cytosine arabinoside, initially at a dose of 2000 mg/m2 but reduced to 100 mg/m2 because of toxicity. Those under 36 achieving a complete remission and with an histocompatible donor were assigned to a transplant arm. The rest were randomized to receive one of three consolidation arms: A, cytosine arabinoside, 200 mg/m2 daily for 7 days and daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 daily for 3 days for three courses; B, one course as in Arm A followed by amsacrine, 120 mg/m2 daily for 5 days followed by a 5-day continuous infusion of azacytidine, 150 mg/m2/day; C, thioguanine and cytosine arabinoside, 100 mg/m2 every 12 h and daunorubicin 10 mg/m2 daily for 5 days for three courses followed by four maintenance courses of cytosine arabinoside, 100 mg/m2 daily for 5 days and daunorubicin, 45 mg/m2 for 2 days every 13 weeks. From 1981 to 1986, 398 eligible patients were enrolled and 219 achieved a complete remission. The initial induction dose of cytosine arabinoside was reduced after five of 29 patients exhibited fatal gastrointestinal toxicity. Only 11 patients were assigned to the transplant arm. There were no significant differences in the consolidation arms. The 5 year disease-free survivals were 38, 31 and 27% in arms A, B, and C respectively. Intensive consolidation therapy with the same or different drugs used in induction was as effective as lower dose consolidation followed by maintenance therapy.