Quality assurance of the dose delivered by small radiation segments

The use of intensity modulation with multiple static fields has been suggested by many authors as a way to achieve highly conformal fields in radiotherapy. However, quality assurance of linear accelerators is generally done only for beam segments of 100 MU or higher, and by measuring beam profiles once the beam has stabilized. We propose a set of measurements to check the stability of dose delivery in small segments, and present measured data from three radiotherapy centres. The dose delivered per monitor unit, MU, was measured for various numbers of MU segments. The field flatness and symmetry were measured using either photographic films that are subsequently scanned by a densitometer, or by using a diode array. We performed the set of measurements at the three radiotherapy centres on a set of five different Philips SL accelerators with energies of 6 MV, 8 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV. The dose per monitor unit over the range of 1 to 100 MU was found to be accurate to within +/-5% of the nominal dose per monitor unit as defined for the delivery of 100 MU for all the energies. For four out of the five accelerators the dose per monitor unit over the same range was even found to be accurate to within +/-2%. The flatness and symmetry were in some cases found to be larger for small segments by a maximum of 9% of the flatness/symmetry for large segments. The result of this study provides the dosimetric evidence that the delivery of small segment doses as top-up fields for beam intensity modulation is feasible. However, it should be stressed that linear accelerators have different characteristics for the delivery of small segments, hence this type of measurement should be performed for each machine before the delivery of small dose segments is approved. In some cases it may be advisable to use a low pulse repetition frequency (PRF) to obtain more accurate dose delivery of small segments.     

Isolation, primary sequence determination, and disulfide bond structure of cyanovirin-N, an anti-HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) protein from the cyanobacterium Nostoc ellipsosporum

PURPOSE: To determine if portal setup films are an accurate representation of a patient's position throughout the course of fractionated tangential breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen patients undergoing external beam irradiation for T1-T2 infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast following excisional biopsy and axillary dissection were imaged using an on-line portal imaging device attached to a 6 MV linear accelerator. Medial and lateral tangential fields were imaged and a total of 139 fractions, 225 portal fields, and 4450 images were obtained. Interfractional and intrafractional variations for anatomical parameters including the central lung distance (CLD), central flash distance (CFD), and inferior central margin (ICM) were calculated from these images. A pooled estimate of the random error associated with a given treatment was determined by adding the interfractional and intrafractional standard deviations in quadrature. A 95% confidence level assigned a value of two standard deviations of the random error estimate. Central lung distance, CFD, and ICM distances were then measured for all portal setup films. Significant differences were defined as occurring when the simulation-setup difference was greater than the 95% confidence value. RESULTS: Differences between setup portal and simulation films were less than their 95% confidence values in 70 instances indicating that in 90% of the time these differences are a result of random differences in daily treatment positioning. CONCLUSIONS: In 90% of cases tested, initial portal setup films are an accurate representation of a patients daily treatment setup.     

Monte Carlo dosimetry study of a 6 MV stereotactic radiosurgery unit

Small-field and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) dosimetry with radiation detectors, used for clinical practice, have often been questioned due to the lack of lateral electron equilibrium and uncertainty in beam energy. A dosimetry study was performed for a dedicated 6 MV SRS unit, capable of generating circular radiation fields with diameters of 1.25-5 cm at isocentre using the BEAM/EGS4 Monte Carlo code. With this code the accelerator was modelled for radiation fields with a diameter as small as 0.5 cm. The radiation fields and dosimetric characteristics (photon spectra, depth doses, lateral dose profiles and cone factors) in a water phantom were evaluated. The cone factor (St) for a specific cone c at depth d is defined as St(d, c) = D(d, c)/D(d, c(ref)), where c(ref) is the reference cone. To verify the Monte Carlo calculations, measurements were performed with detectors commonly used in SRS such as small-volume ion chambers, a diamond detector, TLDs and films. Results show that beam energies vary with cone diameter. For a 6 MV beam, the mean energies in water at the point of maximum dose for a 0.5 cm cone and a 5 cm cone are 2.05 MeV and 1.65 MeV respectively. The values of St obtained by the simulations are in good agreement with the results of the measurements for most detectors. When the lateral resolution of the detectors is taken into account, the results agree within a few per cent for most fields and detectors. The calculations showed a variation of St with depth in the water. Based on calculated electron spectra in water, the validity of the assumption that measured dose ratios are equal to measured detector readings was verified.     

Calculating dose and output factors for wedged photon radiotherapy fields using a convolution/superposition method

To account for clinical divergent and polychromatic photon beams, we have developed kernel tilting and kernel hardening correction methods for convolution dose calculation algorithms. The new correction methods were validated by Monte Carlo simulation. The accuracy and computation time of the our kernel tilting and kernel hardening correction methods were also compared to the existing approaches including terma divergence correction, dose divergence correction methods, and the effective mean kernel method with no kernel hardening correction. Treatment fields of 10 x 10-40 x 40 cm2 (field size at source to axis distance (SAD)) with source to source distances (SSDs) of 60, 80, and 100 cm, and photon energies of 6, 10, and 18 MV have been studied. Our results showed that based on the relative dose errors at a depth of 15 cm along the central axis, the terma divergence correction may be used for fields smaller than 10 x 10 cm2 with a SSD larger than 80 cm; the dose divergence correction with an additional kernel hardening correction can reduce dose error and may be more applicable than the terma divergence correction. For both these methods, the dose error increased linearly with the depth in the phantom; the 90% isodose lines at the depth of 15 cm were shifted by about 2%-5% of the field width due to significant underestimation of the penumbra dose. The kernel hardening effect was less prominent than the kernel tilting effect for clinical photon beams. The dose error by using nonhardening corrected kernel is less than 2.0% at a depth of 15 cm along the central axis, yet it increased with a smaller field size and lower photon energy. The kernel hardening correction could be more important to compute dose in the fields with beam modifiers such as wedges when beam hardening is more significant. The kernel tilting correction and kernel hardening correction increased computation time by about 3 times, and 0.5-1 times, respectively. This can be justified by more accurate dose calculations for the majority of clinical treatments.     

Glass transition temperatures of dental porcelains determined by DSC measurement

The dosimetric data on tissue maximum ratios (TMR), output factors, off axis ratios and beam profiles are presented for small circular fields of diameters ranging from 12.5 to 40 mm for 6 MV radiosurgery beam. It is noticed that dmax increases as the collimator field size increases. Comparison of our data with the published TMR and output factors of similar small circular fields shows that our values are higher than those data. Similarities in trend are noticed with the published isodose volumes for 1-5 and 10 arcs. Not much variation is seen beyond two arcs for 80% isodose volumes for all the field sizes. The variation is small in 20% isodose volumes beyond three arcs. Variations are noticed in 5% isodose volumes for 12.5 mm diameter collimated beam. Our experience has been exclusively with malignant neoplasms. An ideal target volume is covered by 80% isodose volume with 3-4 arcs and a single isocenter. Sixteen patients have been treated to date at our institution, including one patient with brain metastases, two patients with meningiomas, one patient with lymphoma and 12 patients with astrocytomas. The majority of tumors have been treated with single isocenter but some as large as 7 cm have been treated safely with two isocenters.     

Measurement of off-axis and peripheral skin dose using radiochromic film

A radiotheraphy skin dose profile can be obtained with radiochromic film. The central axis skin dose relative to Dmax for a 10 x 10 cm2 field size was found to be 22%, 17% and 15.5% for 6 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV photon beams. Peripheral dose increased with increasing field size. At 10 MV the skin dose 2 cm outside the geometric field edge was measured as 6%, 10% and 17% for 10 x 10 cm2, 20 x 20 cm2 and 30 x 30 cm2 field sizes respectively. Off-axis skin dose decreased as distance increased from central axis for fields with Perspex block trays. For a 20 x 20 cm2 field, an approximately 5-8% drop in percentage skin dose was observed from central axis to the beam edge.     

Utility of three-dimensional planning for axillary node coverage with breast-conserving radiation therapy: early experience

PURPOSE: To examine the dosimetric axillary nodal coverage with standard tangential breast radiation fields and determine the utility of three-dimensional treatment planning for such coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six consecutive patients who were to undergo whole-breast irradiation underwent computed tomographic scanning with 5-mm sections at the time of treatment simulation. Contours were made with a commercial workstation for the lower axillary tissues, lungs, and heart. Axillary coverage was examined with three-dimensional isodose visualization and dose-volume histograms for four plans for each patient: (a) standard tangential radiation fields designed to cover only the breast, with clinical setup; (b) standard tangential fields with beam's-eye-view optimization of collimator angles for axillary and breast coverage; (c) standard tangential fields with adjustment of field width and collimator angles; and (d) customized fields, by adjusting width, collimator angle, and gantry angle and by using customized blocks. RESULTS: With plan a, only one patient had a simulated mean axillary dose greater than 90% of that prescribed. Underdosing occurred primarily in the posterior-superior axillary nodal region. Plan b improved axillary coverage; five patients had a simulated mean axillary dose of 89% or more of the prescribed dose, with adequate whole-breast coverage and no increased pulmonary or cardiac doses. Adjusting the field width and gantry angle further improved simulated mean axillary doses; however, customized blocking was then required to avoid increased mean pulmonary and cardiac doses and unacceptable contralateral breast doses. CONCLUSION: When coverage of lower axillary nodal tissue is desired at breast irradiation, three-dimensional planning with beam's-eye-view adjustment of tangential fields should be considered.     

No association between c-myc amplification and TP53 mutation in sarcoma tumorigenesis

Accuracy of dose delivery at low monitor unit setting is studied for a dual photon energy linear accelerator. Dose delivered per MU is found to be constant for both the photon beams for MU settings above 30. For lower MUs there is definite deviation from the calibrated value and the error is found to be increasing as fewer MUs are set for dose delivery. This dose/MU ratio at low MU setting is found to be dose-rate dependent, showing an increasing trend with pulse repetition frequency (PRF). Also, the dosimetric ratio is observed to be mode dependent; its value for an 18 MV beam is almost double that observed in the case of a 6 MV beam at very low MU setting. The magnitude of this error should be determined for each energy so that appropriate corrections can be applied if very low MUs are to be used.     

Microdosimetric specification of the radiation quality of a d(48.5)+Be fast neutron therapy beam produced by a superconducting cyclotron

The proportional counter microdosimetric technique has been employed to quantify variations in the quality of a d(48.5)+Be fast neutron beam passing through a homogeneous water phantom. Single event spectra have been measured as a function of spatial location in the water phantom and field size. The measured spectra have been separated into component spectra corresponding to the gamma, recoil proton and alpha plus heavy recoil ion contribution to the total absorbed dose. The total absorbed dose normalized to the "monitor units" used in daily clinical use has been calculated from the measured spectra and compared to the data measured with calibrated ion chambers. The present measurements agree with the ion chamber data to within 5%. The RBE of the neutron beam is assumed to be proportional to the microdosimetric parameter y* for the dose ranges pertinent to fractionated neutron therapy. The relative variations in y*, assumed to be representative of variations in the RBE are mapped as a function of field size and spatial location in the phantom. A variation in the RBE of about 4% for points within and 8% for points outside a 10 cm x 10 cm field is observed. The variations in the RBE within the beam are caused by an increase in the gamma component with depth. An increase in the RBE of about 4% is observed with increasing field size which is attributed to a change in the neutron spectrum. Compared to the uncertainties in the prescribed dose, associated with uncertainties in the clinically used RBE, variation in the RBE between various tissues, and other dosimetric uncertainties caused by factors such as patient inhomogeneities, patient setup errors, patient motion, etc., the measured spatial RBE variations are not considered significant enough to be incorporated into the treatment planning scheme.     

Clinical use of on-line portal imaging for daily patient treatment verification

PURPOSE: To determine the ease of use by clinical staff and reliability of an electronic portal imaging system and evaluate the potential to utilize on-line imaging to assess accuracy of daily patient treatment positioning in radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computer controlled fluorescent screen-mirror imaging system was used to acquire on-line portal images. A physician panel assessed on-line image quality relative to standard portal film. Clinical use of the imager was implemented through a protocol where images were obtained during the first six monitor units of external beam. The images were visually compared to a reference portal and patient setup was adjusted for errors exceeding 5 mm. Subsequent off-line analysis was utilized to give insight into the magnitude of clinical setup error in the visually accepted images. RESULTS: Physician evaluation of on-line image quality with an initial 211 images found that 70% were comparable or superior to standard film portal images. Eighty percent of treatment fields fit completely within the on-line imaging area. Eight percent of on-line images were rejected due to poor image quality. Twelve percent of the daily treatment setups imaged required adjustment overall, but specific field types predictably required more frequent adjustment (pelvic and mantle fields). Off-line analysis of accepted images demonstrates that 18% of the final images had setup errors exceeding 5 mm. CONCLUSION: On-line imaging facilitated daily portal alignment and verification. Ease of use, almost instantaneous viewing and consistent ability to identify and locate anatomical landmarks imply the potential for on-line imaging to replace film based approaches. Retrospective analysis of daily images reveals that visual assessment of setup is not sufficient for eliminating localization errors. Further improvement is required with respect to detecting localization error and fully encompassing larger field sizes.     

Population dynamics of the Wolbachia infection causing cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster

PURPOSE: The use of escalated radiation doses to improve local control in conformal radiotherapy of prostatic cancer is becoming the focus of many centers. There are, however, increased side effects associated with increased radiotherapy doses that are believed to be dependent on the volume of normal tissue irradiated. For this reason, accurate patient positioning, CT planning with 3D reconstruction of volumes of interest, clear definition of treatment margins and verification of treatment fields are necessary components of the quality control for these procedures. In this study electronic portal images are used to (a) evaluate the magnitude and effect of the setup errors encountered in patient positioning techniques, and (b) verify the multileaf collimator (MLC) field patterns for each of the treatment fields. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Phase I volume, with a planning target volume (PTV) composed of the gross tumour volume (GTV) plus a 1.5 cm margin is treated conformally with a three-field plan (usually an anterior field and two lateral or oblique fields). A Phase II, with no margin around the GTV, is treated using two lateral and four oblique fields. Portal images are acquired and compared to digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and/or simulator films during Phase I to assess the systematic (CT planning or simulator to treatment error) and the daily random errors. The match results from these images are used to correct for the systematic errors, if necessary, and to monitor the time trends and effectiveness of patient imobilization systems used during the Phase I treatment course. For the Phase II, portal images of an anterior and lateral field (larger than the treatment fields) matched to DRRs (or simulator images) are used to verify the isocenter position 1 week before start of Phase II. The Portal images are acquired for all the treatment fields on the first day to verify the MLC field patterns and archived for records. The final distribution of the setup errors was used to calculate modified dose-volume histograms (DVHs). This procedure was carried out on 36 prostate cancer patients, 12 with vacuum-molded (VacFix) bags for immobilization and 24 with no immobilization. RESULTS: The systematic errors can be visualized and corrected for before the doses are increased above the conventional levels. The requirement for correction of these errors (e.g., 2.5 mm AP shift) was demonstrated, using DVHs, in the observed 10% increase in rectal volume receiving at least 60 Gy. The random (daily) errors observed showed the need for patient fixation devices when treating with reduced margins. The percentage of fields with displacements of < or = 5.0 mm increased from 82 to 96% with the use of VacFix bags. The rotation of the pelvis is also minimized when the bags are used, with over 95% of the fields with rotations of < or = 2.0 degrees compared to 85% without. Currently, a combination of VacFix and thermoplastic casts is being investigated. CONCLUSION: The systematic errors can easily be identified and corrected for in the early stages of the Phase I treatment course. The time trends observed during the course of Phase I in conjunction with the isocenter verification at the start of Phase II give good prediction of the accuracy of the setup during Phase II, where visibility of identifiable structures is reduced in the small fields. The acquisition and inspection of the portal images for the small Phase I fields has been found to be an effective way of keeping a record of the MLC field patterns used. Incorporation of the distribution of the setup errors into the planning system also gives a clearer picture of how the prescribed dose was delivered. This information can be useful in dose-escalation studies in determining the relationship between the local control or morbidity rates and prescribed dose.     

Electron contamination in clinical high energy photon beams

The electron contamination in photon beams has been investigated by means of contaminating lepton depth doses and dose profiles in different geometries with two 20 MV beams. Different components of this contamination have been investigated separately by systematically adding contamination to a "clean" reference field. At 20 MV, the air generated electrons were found to be almost negligible compared to the electrons originating from the accelerator head when measurements were performed in standard fields at SSDs between 80 and 120 cm. The total electron part of the depth dose curve was then almost the same, i.e., independent of SSD, when the collimator opening was held fixed. However, when different accessories such as a shaping block and different attenuating plates were located in the beam path below the collimators, a large SSD dependence of the electron contamination was noticed. A comparison was also made between two machines, one equipped with a multileaf collimator, with similar beam qualities at 20 MV. These measurements indicate that the interior view of the treatment head seen by the detector (mainly the flattening filter, monitor chamber, or other electron generating material) influences the magnitude of the electron contamination. When the collimator opening is decreased the electron contamination will also decrease as parts of the electron source will be shielded by the collimator blocks.     

An experimental investigation of the tongue and groove effect for the Philips multileaf collimator

The tongue and groove effect is an underdosing effect which can occur in certain applications of multileaf collimators. It results from the need to overlap adjacent leaves of a multileaf collimator in order to limit leakage between leaves. The applications in which the effect can occur are the abutment of fields where the beam edges are defined by the leaf edge and the production of intensity-modulated fields by dynamic collimation. The effect has been measured for the 'worst case' when just two MLC fields are matched along leaf edges which have overlapping steps. Measurements of the dose have been made at d(max) and also at a more clinically relevant depth of 87 mm in Perspex for beam energies of 6 MV, 8 MV and 20 MV on two Philips SL series accelerators. Dose distributions were recorded on radiographic film which was subsequently digitized for analysis. The dose reduction of the tongue and groove effect was found to be 15-28% and spread over a width of 3.8 to 4.2 mm. This is somewhat shallower and wider than would be expected from a simple, idealized model of the effect which would predict a dose reduction of 80% over a width of 1 mm.     

Radiation dose perturbation at tissue-titanium dental interfaces in head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE: To determine the dose perturbation effects at the tissue-metal implant interfaces in head and neck cancer patients treated with 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Phantom measurements were performed to investigate the magnitude of dose perturbation to the tissue adjacent to the titanium alloy implants with (100 mu and 500 mu thick) and without hydroxylapatite (HA) coating. Radiographic and radiochromic films were placed at the upper (and lower) surface of circular metal discs (diameter x thickness: 15 x 3.2, 48 x 3.2, 48 x 3.8 mm2) in a solid water phantom and were exposed perpendicular to radiation beams. The dosimeters were scanned with automatic film scanners. Using a thin-window parallel-plate ion chamber, dose perturbation were measured for a 48 x 3.2 mm2 disc. RESULTS: At the upper surface of the tissue-dental implant interface, the radiographic data indicate that for 15 x 3.2 mm2 uncoated, as well as 100 mu coated discs, dose perturbation is about +22.5% and +20.0% using 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams, respectively. For 48 x 3.2 mm2 discs, these values basically remain the same. However, for 48 x 3.8 mm2 discs, these values increase slightly to about +23.0% and +20.5% for 6 MV and 10 MV beams, respectively. For 48 x 3.2 mm2 discs with 500 mu coating, dose enhancement is slightly lower than that obtained for uncoated and 100 mu coated discs for each beam energy studied. At the lower interface for 15 x 3.2 mm2 and 48 x 3.2 mm2 uncoated and 100 mu coated discs, dose reduction is similar and is about -13.5% and -9.5% for 6 MV and 10 MV beams, respectively. For 48 x 3.8 mm2 discs, dose reduction is about -14.5% and -10.0% for 6 MV and 10 MV beams, respectively. For 48 x 3.2 mm2 discs with 500 mu coating, the dose reduction were slightly higher than those for uncoated and 100 mu coated discs. CONCLUSIONS: For the beam energies studied, dose enhancement is slightly larger for the lower energy beam. The results of dose perturbation were similar for 100 mu coated and uncoated discs. These results were slightly lower for the 500 mu coated discs but are not clinically significant. The dosimetry results obtained from radiochromic films were similar to the ones obtained from radiographic film. The dose enhancement results obtained from ion chamber dosimetry are higher than those obtained from film dosimetry. The ion chamber data represent the data at "true" tissue-titanium interface, whereas the ones obtained from film dosimetry represent the data at film-titanium interface.     

Endothelin in migraine patients

AIM: Improvement of the dose homogeneity in radiation treatment of the intact breast using 3D-planning and dose volume histograms. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 3D-planning, including the calculation of dose volume histograms of the planning target volume, was performed on 15 patients, who underwent radiation therapy with tangential photon beams. A standard plan and 2 modified or optimized plans were evaluated. Different dosimetric parameters like maximum dose, mean dose, standard deviation and the fractional volume which receives doses from 95 to 105% of the reference dose were compared and correlated with breast size. RESULTS: With increasing breast size standard planning leads to increased overdosage, both in magnitude and volume. Individual optimization by modifying weights and wedges gives no improvement in dose homogeneity, whereas a photon energy of 10 MV results in a more homogeneous dose distribution. The drawback of the higher energy is the increased underdosage of the skin. CONCLUSION: Using the standard geometry of tangential fields the dose homogeneity cannot be improved significantly by 3D-planning, compared to our standard technique.     

Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy

The use of a multileaf collimator in the dynamic mode to perform intensity modulated radiotherapy became a reality at our institution in 1995. Unlike treatment with static fields using a multileaf collimator, there are significant dosimetric issues which must be assessed before dynamic therapy can be implemented. We have performed a series of calculations and measurements to quantify head scatter for small fields, collimator transmission, and the transmission through rounded leaf ends. If not accounted for, these factors affect the delivered dose to the prostate by 5%-20% for a typical plan. Data obtained with ion chambers and radiographic film are presented for both 6 and 15 MV x-ray beams. The impact on the delivered dose of the mechanical accuracy of the multileaf collimator, achieved during leaf position calibration and maintained during dose delivery, is also discussed.     

Negative regulation of the anti-human immunodeficiency virus and chemotactic activity of human stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha by CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV

A method to characterize the energy distribution in the whole photon field is valuable when designing an accelerator for choosing target and flattening filter or scan pattern. Another field of application is beam characterization for treatment planning systems or other dosimetric purposes. This work is focused on the energy distribution in different 50 MV bremsstrahlung beams with different scanning of electrons on three different targets. Fluence differential in energy and angle at the exit of each target has been determined by Monte Carlo calculations for a narrow beam. Data for broad beams were obtained by convolution of the narrow beams with different scan patterns. Photon energy fluence differential in energy at SSD 100 were thus found to be rather different for the targets studied. The results are presented as mean energy profiles and narrow beam half-value layer (HVL) in water. Two different experimental setups were used to measure HVL at the central axis and at off-axis positions. The two methods gave results which differ by 5%-6% and the calculated data where within these experimental results. In conclusion, the presented method for characterization of the photon field energy distribution is well within the experimental results and can thus be used to improve accelerator design or dosimetric calculations, e.g., for treatment planning.     

The use of adaptive radiation therapy to reduce setup error: a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE: Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) is a feedback treatment process that optimizes a patient's treatment according to the patient specific information measured during the course of treatment. Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and a computer-controlled multileaf collimator (MLC), the ART process is currently being implemented in our clinic to improve the treatment accuracy by compensating for the treatment setup error. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the ART process for clinical use. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The prospective study included 20 patients who underwent conventional radiotherapy on a linear accelerator equipped with an EPID and a MLC. No specific changes were made in the routine clinical procedures except daily portal images were obtained for each treatment field. Two-dimensional setup error for each treatment field was then measured offline using a software tool. The measured setup errors from initial treatment days were used to predict the systematic and random setup errors for each treatment field. An adjustment decision was made if the predicted systematic error was larger than or equal to 2 mm. Furthermore, the treatment field was extended if the predicted random setup error could not be effectively compensated by the predefined treatment setup margin. Instead of the conventional approach of patient repositioning, setup adjustment was implemented by reshaping the MLC field. The entire process from measuring setup error to reshaping the MLC field was performed offline through a computer network. After completion of a patient's treatment, the systematic and random setup errors after adjustment were compared with those predicted prior to the adjustment. The accuracy of the adjustment, and the reliability and stability of the process were analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment fields of 13 patients were modified to correct for systematic errors. The mean systematic error was 4 mm with a range of 2 to 7 mm before adjustment. It was reduced to 0.5 mm with a range of 0.2 to 1.4 mm after adjustment. There was no significant difference in random setup errors before and after adjustment. The ART process was found to be stable, as more than 95% of patient specific setup margins were predictable within 1 mm using the first four to nine fractions of treatment, confirming the feasibility of treatment plan reoptimization with the ART process. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective study demonstrates that the ART process can be effectively implemented in routine clinical practice to improve treatment accuracy. This process is also ready to be further extended to reoptimize the treatment plan by incorporating the predicted patient specific setup variation.     

Optimized lens-sparing treatment of retinoblastoma with electron beams

PURPOSE: The ideal lens-sparing radiotherapy technique for retinoblastoma calls for 100% dose to the entire retina including the ora serrata and zero dose to the lens. Published techniques, most of which use photons, have not accomplished this ideal treatment. We describe here a technique that approaches this ideal configuration using electron beam therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose-modeling calculations were made using a computer program built around a proprietary algorithm. This program calculates 3D dose distribution for electrons and photons and uses the Cimmino feasibility method for the inverse problem of beam weighting to achieve the prescribed dose. The algorithm has been verified in the ocular region by measurements in a RANDO phantom. To search for an ideal lens-sparing beam setup, a stylized phantom of an 8-month-old infant was generated with built-in inhomogeneities, and a phantom of a 5-year-old child was generated from a patient CT series. RESULTS: Of more than 100 different beam setups tested, two 9 MeV electron beams at gantry angles plus and minus 26 degrees from the optic nerve axis achieved the best distribution. Both fields have a lens block and an isocenter between the globe and origin of the optic nerve. When equal doses are given to both fields, the entire extent of the retina (including ora serrata) received 100%, while the lens received 10% or less. CONCLUSION: The two-oblique-electron-beam technique here described appears to meet most of the stringent dosimetry needed to treat retinoblastoma. It is suitable for a range of ages, from infancy to early childhood years.     

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in a low-risk European population for coronary artery disease

PURPOSE: Physiologic and non-physiologic tumor motion complicates the use of tight margins in three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy. Setup reproducibility is an important non-physiologic cause of tumor motion. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare patient setup reproducibility using the reusable T-bar and the disposable expanded foam immobilization device (EFID) in radiation therapy for lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred forty-four portal films were taken from 16 prospectively accrued patients treated for lung cancer. Patients were treated with either a pair of anterior and posterior parallel opposing fields (POF), or a combination of POF and a three-field isocentric technique. Each patient was treated in a supine position using either the T-bar setup or EFID. Six patients were treated in both devices over their treatment courses. Field placement analysis was used to evaluate 3D setup reproducibility, by comparing positions of bony landmarks relative to the radiation field edges in digitized simulator and portal images. Anterior-posterior, lateral, and longitudinal displacements, as well as field rotations along coronal and sagittal planes were measured. Statistical analyses of variance were applied to the deviations among portal films of all patients and the subgroup treated with both immobilization methods. RESULTS: For the T-bar immobilization device, standard deviations of the setup reproducibility were 5.1, 3.7, and 5.1 mm in the anterior-posterior, lateral, and longitudinal dimensions, respectively. Rotations in the coronal plane and the sagittal plane were 0.9 degrees and 1.0 degrees, respectively. For the EFID, corresponding standard deviations of set up reproducibility were 3.6 mm, 5.3 mm, 5.4 mm, 0.7 degrees and 1.4 degrees, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.22) in the 3D setup reproducibility between T-bar and EFID. Subgroup analysis for the patients who were treated with both immobilization devices did not reveal a difference either. There was no consistent systematic error from simulator to treatment unit identified for either immobilization device. CONCLUSION: Although the optimal immobilization technique and patient positioning for thoracic radiotherapy have yet to be determined, this study indicates that T-bar is comparable with EFID in its setup reproducibility. In view of the inherent advantages of T-bar, it has become a standard immobilization device at our institution. The observed range of displacements in field positioning with either immobilization device implies that one cm (two standard deviations [SD] of setup error) will be a more appropriate margin to allow for setup variability in radiation therapy for lung cancer.