Efficacy of ondansetron in prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients following infratentorial surgery: a placebo-controlled prospective double-blind study

Competitive PCR was used to monitor the survival of a 520-bp DNA target sequence from a recombinant plasmid, pVACMC1, after admixture of the plasmid with freshly sampled human saliva. The fraction of the target remaining amplifiable ranged from 40 to 65% after 10 min of exposure to saliva samples from five subjects and from 6 to 25% after 60 min of exposure. pVACMC1 plasmid DNA that had been exposed to degradation by fresh saliva was capable of transforming naturally competent Streptococcus gordonii DL1 to erythromycin resistance, although transforming activity decreased rapidly, with a half-life of approximately 50 s. S. gordonii DL1 transformants were obtained in the presence of filter-sterilized saliva and a 1-microg/ml final concentration of pVACMC1 DNA. Addition of filter-sterilized saliva instead of heat-inactivated horse serum to S. gordonii DL1 cells induced competence, although with slightly lower efficiency. These findings indicate that DNA released from bacteria or food sources within the mouth has the potential to transform naturally competent oral bacteria. However, further investigations are needed to establish whether transformation of oral bacteria can occur at significant frequencies in vivo.     

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting with ondansetron: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study in 90 patients

Cortical variation in mammals and other terrestrial vertebrates, re-examined by current comparative methodology (out-group analysis), indicates that separate lateral (olfactory), dorsal and medial (hippocampal) pallial or cortical formations arose with the origin of vertebrates. Although the exact origin of mammalian isocortex (so-called neocortex) is still disputed, it appears that the earliest mammals already had a six-layered isocortex with ten to 20 functional subdivisions. Among placental mammals, at least, isocortex has expanded numerous times, producing additional cortical subdivisions. Because these expansions were independent transformations of a simpler cortex, they produced subdivisions that are not homologous.     

Intravenous dolasetron and ondansetron in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Intravenous dolasetron mesilate has shown efficacy in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) when administered as a single dose prior to emergence from anesthesia. This trial compared intravenous dolasetron and ondansetron for the prevention of PONV when administered at induction of anesthesia. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial randomized patients to one of four single IV treatments placebo, 25 or 50 mg dolasetron, or 4 mg ondansetron. Efficacy was measured by complete response (0 emetic episodes and no rescue medication), nausea severity and patient satisfaction as measured on a visual analog scale (VAS), investigator's rating, of nausea severity, and total response (complete response with no nausea [< or = 5 mm VAS]). RESULTS: 514 patients at 24 sites were evaluated for efficacy. The 50 mg dolasetron and 4 mg ondansetron doses were statistically equivalent, and superior to placebo, for all efficacy measures. Complete response rates were 49%, 51%, 71% and 64% for placebo, 25 and 50 mg dolasetron, and ondansetron, respectively. Dolasetron 50 mg was statistically superior to 25 mg dolasetron for complete response, total response, VAS maximum nausea, time to first emetic episode, and patient satisfaction. The majority of adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity. Headache was the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event with a 3%-5% incidence across treatments. CONCLUSION: When given at induction of anesthesia, 50 mg intravenous dolasetron is equivalent to 4 mg ondansetron and superior to 25 mg dolasetron and placebo for the prevention of PONV. All treatments were safely administered and well tolerated.     

Ketorolac and propofol administration for prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery

This clinical review explores the efficacy of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent, ketorolac tromethamine, added to an anesthetic regimen utilizing intravenous propofol. Both agents have been shown to reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting postoperatively when administered to patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery. Because the incidence of nausea and vomiting is significantly reduced when ketorolac is used in place of opioids to attenuate postoperative pain, it would appear to be an appropriate choice of agent to use following propofol anesthesia. The use of this combination of drugs may not only reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery, but could reduce the duration of hospitalization and enhance recovery from anesthesia.     

Prophylactic oral antiemetics for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: granisetron versus domperidone

In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, we evaluated the efficacy of the oral antiemetics, granisetron and domperidone, for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 100 women undergoing major gynecologic surgery. Patients received either granisetron 2 mg or domperidone 20 mg (n = 50 in each group) orally 1 h before surgery. Standardized anesthetic techniques and postoperative analgesia regimens were used. Complete response (defined as no PONV and no administration of rescue antiemetic medication) for 0-3 h after anesthesia was 88% with granisetron and 52% with domperidone; the corresponding incidence for 3-24 h after anesthesia was 86% and 48% (P < 0.05). No clinically important adverse events due to the drugs were observed in any of the groups. In conclusion, the efficacy of preoperative oral granisetron is superior to that of domperidone for the prevention of PONV after major gynecologic surgery. IMPLICATIONS: We compared the efficacy of granisetron and domperidone administered orally for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing gynecologic surgery. Preoperative oral granisetron was more effective than domperidone.     

Ondansetron versus droperidol or placebo to prevent nausea and vomiting after otologic surgery

This study compares the preoperative administration of ondansetron with that of droperidol or saline solution for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in otologic surgery patients. A total of 120 otherwise healthy individuals were randomly assigned to receive either saline solution, ondansetron (4 mg intravenously), or droperidol (25 microg/kg intravenously) before anesthetic induction. Intraoperative and postanesthesia care unit times were recorded along with incidence of nausea, vomiting, pain, nausea and recovery scores, and the administration of rescue antiemetics. Similar assessments were made during the next 24 hours. Demographics were similar, but more males received ondansetron. Anesthetic recovery scores were lower after administration of droperidol than after ondansetron. Incidence of nausea was similar between groups, but severity was greater with placebo and droperidol than with ondansetron. More vomiting occurred with placebo than with ondansetron or droperidol. No intergroup differences in rescue antiemetic administration were noted, however. Twenty-four hours later, more patients receiving placebo had nausea or vomited than patients receiving droperidol or ondansetron. Fewer women in the ondansetron group vomited than in the other two groups. Ondansetron 4 mg intravenously is as effective as droperidol and better than saline solution in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing otologic surgery. No cost advantage as determined by lower use of rescue antiemetics or shorter postanesthesia care unit times was noted after ondansetron therapy.     

Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study

PURPOSE: The antiemetic effectiveness and safety of single-dose oral granisetron were compared with intravenous (I.V.) ondansetron in chemotherapy-naive patients who received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group study, patients naive to emetogenic chemotherapy (N = 1,085) who were scheduled to receive cyclophosphamide- (500 to 1,200 mg/m2) or carboplatin (> or = 300 mg/m2) based chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either oral granisetron (n = 542) or I.V. ondansetron (n = 543). Efficacy assessments included the proportion of patients in each treatment group with total control over the 24 and 48 hours following chemotherapy initiation, as well as incidence and severity of nausea and emesis and use of antiemetic rescue medication. Prophylactic corticosteroids were allowed. Safety assessment was based on patients' reports of adverse experiences. RESULTS: Approximately 80% of patients received prophylactic corticosteroids. Single-dose oral granisetron (2 mg) and I.V. ondansetron (32 mg) resulted in equivalent levels of total emetic control during the first 48 hours after chemotherapy. The proportion of nausea- and emesis-free patients at 24 and 48 hours were also approximately equivalent. The most commonly reported adverse experiences were headache, asthenia, and constipation. More patients who received ondonsetron than granisetron reported dizziness (9.6% v 5.4%, respectively; P = .011) and abnormal vision (4.2% v 0.6%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A single oral dose of granisetron (2 mg) resulted in equivalent levels of antiemetic protection as I.V. ondansetron (32 mg). Both agents were well tolerated, although more dizziness and abnormal vision were reported with ondansetron. Because the two antiemetic regimens exhibited equivalent efficacies, additional factors such as convenience and cost of therapy should be considered.     

Oral dolasetron mesylate for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The Oral Dolasetron PONV Prevention Study Group

Parafunctional activities are assumed to play an important role in temporomandibular disorders (TMD), but experimental data in support of this hypothesis are lacking. This study examined the role of parafunctional clenching on various measures of TMD pain. Five subjects participated in daily 17-minute electromyogram biofeedback training sessions structured in three phases. Subjects were instructed to maintain temporalis and masseter muscle activity below 2 microV in the first (decrease) phase of training (10 sessions), above 10 microV in the second (increase) phase (1 to 8 sessions), and below 2 microV in the third (decrease) phase (10 to 15 sessions). Preliminary screening examinations showed that none of the subjects had TMD. Two subjects reported intolerable pain during increase training, and both were diagnosed with a TMD during this phase. No subject was diagnosed with TMD pain during either decrease training phase. The authors conclude that chronic, low-level parafunctional clenching may be a factor in the cause of TMD pain.     

Efficacy of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures: a randomized, double-blind, comparative trial

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the efficacy of ondansetron hydrochloride compared with prochlorperazine maleate for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prophylaxis of PONV in patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, comparative trial was conducted at a tertiary care, university hospital. Seventy-eight patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee replacement procedures received a single dose of ondansetron hydrochloride (n = 37), 4 mg intravenously, or prochlorperazine maleate (n = 41), 10 mg intramuscularly, at the end of the surgical procedure. Rescue therapy was administered every 4 hours as needed during the initial 48 hours. Primary outcome measures were the incidences and severity of PONV. Secondary outcome measures included the number of rescue antiemetic doses required, number of physical therapy cancellations because of PONV, length of hospital stay, and cost of antiemetic agents administered. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea was significantly greater in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group (81% vs 56%; odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-9.4) as was the severity of nausea (P = .04). Multivariate analysis identified administration of ondansetron, history of PONV, obesity, and female sex as risk factors for a nausea event. The incidence of vomiting tended to be greater in the ondansetron group (49% vs 32%; odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-5.0). The need for rescue antiemetic therapy was also greater in the ondansetron group (46% vs 27%; odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-6.0). The mean antiemetic drug cost per patient was significantly greater for the ondansetron group ($47.56 vs $2.47; P<.001). However, the proportion of patients who were unable to participate in physical therapy because of PONV and the median length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Prochlorperazine is associated with superior efficacy and significant cost savings compared with ondansetron for the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing total hip and total knee replacement procedures.     

Tropisetron or ondansetron compared with placebo for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, the efficacy of prophylactic tropisetron (2 mg) or ondansetron (4 mg) for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting after abdominal or non-abdominal surgery with general balanced anaesthesia was studied in 842 ASA I-III patients. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, ondansetron and tropisetron reduced the frequency of emetic episodes compared with the placebo (29%, 30% vs. 42% respectively). In men, neither tropisetron nor ondansetron had an effect different from the placebo, whereas in women both drugs led to lower rates of emetic episodes and nausea. In comparison with abdominal surgery, fewer patients in the non-abdominal surgery subgroup had emetic episodes (42% vs. 23% in the placebo group). However, neither tropisetron nor ondansetron was significantly different from the placebo in this patient subgroup. In conclusion, for patients at increased risk of post-operative nausea and vomiting, a prophylactic therapy at the lowest effective dose with tropisetron or ondansetron may be useful.     

Intravenous dolasetron mesilate in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in females undergoing gynecological surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a range of doses of intravenous (i.v.) dolasetron mesilate, in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial. SETTING: Ten hospitals and/or surgical centers. PATIENTS: 281 women undergoing gynecologic surgery with general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received one of four single, i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate (12.5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) or placebo administered following cessation of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were monitored for 24 hours following study drug administration. The antiemetic efficacy of each dolasetron mesilate dose was evaluated by recording the number and timing of emetic episodes, and the effects on nausea were assessed by use of visual analog scales (VAS). Safety was assessed by adverse event reports, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiographic (ECG) measurements, and monitoring vital signs. Complete responses (patients with no emetic episodes and no escape antiemetic medication requirements in 24 hours) were achieved by 54% in the 12.5-mg, 67% in the 25-mg, and 59% in both the 50-mg and 100-mg dolasetron mesilate dose groups, and by 43% in the placebo group. Nausea VAS assessments demonstrated that dolasetron-treated patients were significantly (p = 0.048) more likely to report no nausea (VAS score < 5 mm) than those in the placebo group. Adverse events reported generally were mild in intensity, and there were no clinically significant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs, or ECG parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Dolasetron was effective and well tolerated for the prevention of PONV in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery with general anesthesia.     

Efficacy, dose-response, and safety of ondansetron in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed efficacy and safety data for ondansetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: Systematically searched, randomized, controlled trials (obtained through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts, manufacturer's database, manual searching of journals, and article reference lists) were analyzed. Relevant end points were prevention of early PONV (within 6 h after surgery) and late PONV (within 48 h) and adverse effects. Relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat were calculated. The number-needed-to-treat indicated how many patients had to be exposed to ondansetron to prevent PONV in one of them who would have vomited or been nauseated had he or she received placebo. RESULTS: Fifty-three trials were found that had data from 7,177 patients receiving 24 different ondansetron regimens and from 5,712 controls receiving placebo or no treatment. Average early and late PONV incidences without ondansetron were 40% and 60%, respectively. There was a dose response for oral and intravenous ondansetron. Best number-needed-to-treat to prevent PONV with the best documented regimens was between 5 and 6. This was achieved with an intravenous dose of 8 mg and an oral dose of 16 mg. Antivomiting efficacy was consistently better than antinausea efficacy. Efficacy in children was poorly documented. Ondansetron significantly increased the risk for elevated liver enzymes (number-needed-to-harm was 31) and headache (number-needed-to-harm was 36). CONCLUSIONS: If the risk of PONV is very high, for every 100 patients receiving an adequate dose of ondansetron 20 patients will not vomit who would have vomited had they received placebo. The antinausea effect is less pronounced. Of these 100, three will have elevated liver enzymes and three will have a headache who would not have had these adverse effects without the drug.     

Results of a survey of anesthetists on postoperative nausea and vomiting

OBJECTIVE: Although an increasing number of studies concerning postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) have been performed, we do not know, what anaesthesiologists think about this problem and how they handle it in their daily routine. METHODS: A survey was performed involving anesthesiologists at 30 institutions of different size. 474 out of 1000 questionnaires were returned. RESULTS: When asked what kind of general anaesthesia they prefere in a woman at a very high risk to suffer PONV, the following answers were obtained: anaesthesia induction with propofol (78%), thiopentone (17%), etomidate (5%). Maintenance of anaesthesia with an inhalation anesthetic (44%) or with propofol (44%). The remaining 14% would use a combination of these techniques (6%) or neuroleptanaesthesia with droperidol (5%) or midazolam (1%). Only 10% of the respondants would omit nitrous oxide. There is no consensus about the optimal amount of intraoperative opioids. Fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil are rated to contribute equally to the occurence of PONV, whereas opioids used for postoperative analgesia are thought to have substantial differences: piritramid is rated to be much less emetogenic than tramadol and morphine. 70% advocate routine antiemetic prophylaxis for high-risk patients (most often mentioned risk factors were: female sex: 85%, obesity: 81%, high doses of intraoperative opioids: 72%) and 23% administrate antiemetics even for all patients. Ondansetron and droperidol are suggested to be superior to metoclopramide, triflupromazine, dimenhydrinate, and transdermal scopolamine. However, metoclopramide is the drug of first choice for more than 50% of the respondants followed by droperidol, whereas only 29% use ondansetron as a first line drug. An unexpected high number of anaesthesiologists (13%) have experience with non-pharmacological methods for prophylaxis and treatment of PONV. Acupuncture/acupressure (10%) was most often mentioned. CONCLUSION: A great majority (93%) stated, that PONV is a relevant problem, that still remains unsolved. This proofs the need for further controlled studies.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled comparison of droperidol, ondansetron, and metoclopramide for the prevention of vomiting following outpatient strabismus surgery in children

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of ondansetron, droperidol, or metoclopramide with placebo in preventing postoperative vomiting following strabismus surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: University outpatient surgery center. PATIENTS: 160 ASA physical status I and II children ages 1 to 12 years who were scheduled for strabismus surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of either ondansetron 100 mcg/kg, metoclopramide 250 mcg/kg, droperidol 75 mcg/kg, or placebo intravenously after induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Both ondansetron and droperidol were superior to metoclopramide and placebo in preventing predischarge vomiting, with incidences of 5%, 5%, 32%, and 25%, respectively. However, there was no difference in the incidence of postdischarge vomiting among the groups (ondansetron 25%, droperidol 25%, metoclopramide 20%, and placebo 25%). CONCLUSIONS: While both ondansetron and droperidol are more effective than metoclopramide when compared with placebo in decreasing the incidence of predischarge vomiting, none of these drugs was more effective than placebo in decreasing the incidence of postdischarge vomiting. Recovery from anesthesia was not significantly different among the groups as assessed by time to awakening, initial Steward score, and time to discharge.     

Ketorolac and diclofenac for postoperative pain relief following oral surgery

Revascularization of severely ischemic limbs was performed on 212 limbs of 156 patients by creating an arteriovenous fistula between the arterial trunk proximal to the obliteration and a deep venous trunk of the ischemic limb, constricting the venous trunk proximal to the anastomosis by two thirds of its original diameter, ligating rami communicans and small tributaries of the deep vein distal to the fistula. The results of experimental and clinical studies showed that the ischemic limb was quickly revascularized and the cardiac function was not damaged after the operation, and the result is more satisfactory than that of arteriovenous reversal by stages.     

Does oral ondansetron reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting after surgery for strabismus in children?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oral ondansetron with oral metoclopramide for the prevention of postoperative vomiting and nausea in children undergoing strabismus surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. PATIENTS: Thirty children of physical class 1, age 9 +/- 4 years, scheduled for strabismus surgery, were randomized into two groups (ondansetron and metoclopramide). METHODS: In the ondansetron group, the children received the first oral dose of ondansetron (4 mg) 1 hour before induction of anaesthesia and the other doses 8 and 16 hours later. In the metoclopramide group, children received metoclopramide (5 mg) in the same conditions. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone, vecuronium and fentanyl and maintained with halothane and N2O/O2. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer for nausea and emesis in recovery room (0-2 h) and on the ward. The adverse effects of oral ondansetron and metoclopramide were assessed. RESULTS: There were non-significant differences between the two groups for incidence of nausea and vomiting (40% and 53% in ondansetron group versus 33 and 60% in metoclopramide group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Unlike intravenous ondansetron, oral ondansetron is not superior to metoclopramide for the prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by strabismus surgery in children.     

Prevention of nausea and vomiting with granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium given orally every 12 hours (amoxicillin, 875 mg; clavulanate, 125 mg) with that given every 8 hours (amoxicillin, 500 mg; clavulanate, 125 mg) for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis. DESIGN: Multicenter double-blind randomized double-dummy controlled trial. SETTING: Physicians' offices and ambulatory care clinics. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy patients at least 18 years of age with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis who could be treated with an oral antimicrobial agent were randomized, and data from 134 were suitable for evaluation. Four patients were withdrawn from this study because of adverse effects. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate orally every 12 hours (amoxicillin, 875 mg; clavulanate, 125 mg) or every 8 hours (amoxicillin, 500 mg; clavulanate, 125 mg) for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical success at the end of therapy. RESULTS: Clinical success at the end of therapy was similar for the 2 treatment groups, 93% and 88% of patients in the every 12-hour and every 8-hour groups, respectively (P = .76; 95% confidence interval, -4.0% to 15.6%). Clinical success rates at follow-up 2 to 4 weeks after the end of therapy were also similar in the 2 groups. Adverse events related to treatment were reported with similar frequency in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Amoxicillin and clavulanate given every 12 hours is as effective and as safe as administration every 8 hours for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.