Parathyroidectomy in Maryland: effects of an endocrine center

BACKGROUND: Surgery for hyperparathyroidism is associated with high cure rates and low morbidity and mortality when performed by experienced surgeons. We wanted to determine whether referral of patients with hyperparathyroidism to an endocrine surgery center has an impact on patient outcomes and costs. METHODS: Data from 901 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy recorded in the Maryland inpatient discharge database between 1990 and 1994 at 52 hospitals were compared with 169 consecutive patients who underwent surgical exploration by one surgeon (R.U.) at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. RESULTS: Although in 47 of 52 hospitals fewer than 10 parathyroidectomies were performed each year, in these hospitals four of five related deaths occurred before patient discharge. The percentage of parathyroidectomies in Maryland performed by one endocrine surgeon has increased from 8% in 1990 to 21% in 1994 and is associated with a 97% cure rate and no mortality. Moreover, while hospital length of stay (LOS) in the state has decreased from 7 to 3.1 days, LOS for the high-volume provider has declined to a mean of 1.3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hyperparathyroidism are increasingly referred to an endocrine surgery center, which results in a high cure rate, low morbidity, no mortality, and a shorter LOS. Improved surgical outcomes and lower costs depend on an experienced surgeon and argue for the referral of these patients to endocrine surgery centers.     

Open heart surgery in adults at Ramathibodi Hospital

Two hundred and thirty consecutive adult patients underwent open heart surgery at Ramathibodi Hospital from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1995. The patients were categorised into 4 groups, A, B, C and D; consisting of 52 (22.4%) with adult congenital heart disease, 121 (52.2%) with acquired valvular heart disease 52 (22.4%) with coronary heart disease and 7 (3%) with diseases of the aorta. The mortality in various groups were analyzed separately each year, in 1994 and 1995. The overall mortality, in adult congenital heart disease, was 5.7 per cent consisting of acquired valvular heart disease (6.6%), coronary artery disease (CAD) (3.8%) and diseases of the aorta (14.2%). We found that the incidence of CAD and the patients underwent CABG were increasing. The overall mortality for open heart surgery in adults was 6 per cent. Though the number of patients who underwent open heart surgery did not truly represent all heart diseases, trends of coronary artery disease seem to be increasing. Risk factors of coronary artery disease and low mortality from CABG might be the main reasons that CABG has increased obviously.     

Models of preoperative risk stratification in cardiac surgery: the prediction of mortality or of survival?

BACKGROUND: The need to assess the quality of heart surgery outcomes stimulated the development of pre-surgical risk stratification models in order to predict outcome on the basis of patient characteristics. The aim of the study was to compare the predictive accuracy of hospital mortality according to the following three models: Parsonnet (NBI Score), Higgins (CCF Score) and Roques (French Score), in a setting totally independent from the one in which the models were derived. METHODS: For each of the 516 patients undergoing heart surgery at our institution between January 1992 and December 1993, we calculated the pre-surgical risk according to the three models. Then we compared the predicted mortality against the observed mortality by means of the Shannon accuracy index, the ROC curve analysis and the overestimation histogram. RESULTS: Overall observed mortality (1.5%) was similar to the predicted mortality by the NBI Score (1.5 +/- 2.1%, p = ns), the CCF Score (1.7 +/- 2.0%, p = ns) and the French Score (1.9 +/- 2.5%, p = ns). The predictive accuracy of global mortality is very high and equal with the three models, and it is very low in the 8 patients who died (NBI Score = 0.06 +/- 0.06; CCF Score = 0.125 +/- 0.067; French Score = 0.102 +/- 0.07, p = ns). The area under the ROC curve is identical in the 3 models. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted mortality obtained by the three models is not significantly different from the observed mortality and therefore, the global accuracy is similar and very high, while it is very low for patients who will die. The models for pre-surgical risk stratification are useful for comparing the results among different institutions or different surgeons, or for monitoring the results over time in the same institution, but they cannot be used to accurately predict the individual risk of hospital mortality.     

A national survey of emergency department chest pain centers in the United States

Although chest pain centers are promoted as improving emergency cardiac care, no data exist on their structure and processes. This national study determines the 1995 prevalence rate for emergency department (ED)-based chest pain centers in the United States and compares organizational differences of EDs with and without such centers. A mail survey was directed to 476 EDs randomly selected from the American Hospital Association's database of metropolitan hospitals (n = 2,309); the response rate was 63%. The prevalence of chest pain centers was 22.5% (95% confidence interval 18% to 27%), which yielded a projection of 520 centers in the United States in 1995. EDs with centers had higher overall patient volumes, greater use of high-technology testing, lower treatment times for thrombolytic therapy, and more advertising (all p <0.05). Hospitals with centers had greater market competition and more beds per annual admissions, cardiac catheterization, and open heart surgery capability (all p <0.05). Logistic regression identified open heart surgery, high-admission volumes, and nonprofit status as independent predictors of hospitals having chest pain centers. Thus, chest pain centers have a moderate prevalence, offer more services and marketing efforts than standard EDs, and tend to be hosted by large nonprofit hospitals.     

Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between each of 2 provider volume measures (annual hospital volume and annual cardiologist volume) for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and 2 outcomes of PTCA (in-hospital mortality and same-stay coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery). DESIGN: Cohort study, using data from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1994, from the Coronary Angioplasty Reporting System of the New York State Department of Health. SETTING: Thirty-one hospitals in New York State in which PTCA was performed during 1991-1994. PATIENTS: All 62670 patients discharged after undergoing PTCA in these hospitals during 1991-1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of in-hospital mortality and CABG surgery during the same stay as the PTCA. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality rate for patients undergoing PTCA in New York during 1991-1994 was 0.90%, and the same-stay CABG surgery rate was 3.43%. Patients undergoing PTCA in hospitals with annual PTCA volumes less than 600 experienced a significantly higher risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rate of 0.96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91%-1.01%) and risk-adjusted same-stay CABG surgery rate of 3.92% (95% CI, 3.76%-4.08%). Patients undergoing PTCA by cardiologists with annual PTCA volumes less than 75 had mortality rates of 1.03% (95% CI, 0.91%-1.17%) and same-stay CABG surgery rates of 3.93% (95% CI, 3.65%-4.24%); both of these rates were also significantly higher than the rates for all patients. Also, same-stay CABG surgery rates for patients undergoing PTCA in hospitals with annual volumes of 600 to 999 performed by cardiologists with annual volumes of 75 to 174 (2.99%; 95% CI, 2.69%-3.31 %) and 175 or more (2.84%; 95% CI, 2.57%-3.14%) were significantly lower than the overall statewide rate (3.43%). CONCLUSIONS: In New York State, both hospital PTCA volume and cardiologist PTCA volume are significantly inversely related to in-hospital mortality rate and same-stay CABG surgery rate for patients undergoing PTCA.     

Chemotherapy in the treatment of the early relapse of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: Introducing accreditation as conducted by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (Oakbrook Terrace, III) into Spain has raised many issues regarding the internationalization of accreditation. CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCREDITATION: In recent years more and more countries have considered accreditation a useful tool for the improvement of health care quality. In spite of the differences in the health care systems of the countries where accreditation has been introduced, many of the original characteristics of accreditation as seen in the United States largely remain: peer review evaluation, support of professional associations, voluntary participation, and a national approach. These similarities reflect the fact that the majority of the programs are based on models created by the Joint Commission. THE EXPERIENCE OF THE AVEDIS DONABEDIAN FOUNDATION: In 1994 the Avedis Donabedian Foundation (FAD), a nonprofit organization founded in Barcelona in 1988, broadened its scope to include accreditation. Having rejected the idea of creating de novo its own standards and accreditation program, FAD worked out an agreement with the Joint Commission whereby FAD would become a Spanish accrediting body to accredit Spanish hospitals but would collaborate with Joint Commission International to adopt the Joint Commission's accreditation standards and processes. DISCUSSION: The development of accreditation continues. As of spring 1998, seven hospitals and two ambulatory care centers are preparing for accreditation. FAD's experience with adapting the Joint Commission model of accreditation should be instructive to other countries considering health care accreditation.     

Severity measurement methods and judging hospital death rates for pneumonia

Payers and policymakers are increasingly examining hospital mortality rates as indicators of hospital quality. To be meaningful, these death rates must be adjusted for patient severity. This research examined whether judgments about an individual hospital's risk-adjusted mortality is affected by the severity adjustment method. Data came from 105 acute care hospitals nationwide that use the Medis-Groups severity measure. The study population was 18,016 adults hospitalized in 1991 for pneumonia. Multivariable logistic models to predict in-hospital death were computed separately for 14 severity methods, controlling for patient age, sex, and diagnosis-related group (DRG). For each hospital, observed-to-expected death rates and z scores were calculated for each severity method. The overall in-hospital death rate was 9.6%. Unadjusted mortality rates for the 105 hospitals ranged from 1.4% to 19.6%. After adjusting for age, sex, DRG, and severity, 73 facilities had observed mortality rates that did not differ significantly from expected rates according to all 14 severity methods; two had rates significantly higher than expected for all 14 severity methods. For 30 hospitals, observed mortality rates differed significantly from expected rates when judged by one or more but not all 14 severity methods. Kappa analysis showed fair to excellent agreement between severity methods. The 14 severity methods agreed about relative hospital performance more often than expected by chance, but perceptions of individual hospitals' mortality rates varied using different severity adjustment methods for almost one third of facilities. Judgments about individual hospital performance using different severity adjustment approaches may reach different conclusions.     

Referral selection bias in the Medicare hospital mortality prediction model: are centers of referral for Medicare beneficiaries necessarily centers of excellence?

OBJECTIVE: Although the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) uses Medicare hospital mortality data as a measure of hospital quality of care, concerns have been raised regarding the validity of this concept. A problem that has not been fully evaluated in these data is the potential confounding effect of illness severity factors associated with referral selection and hospital mortality on comparisons of risk-adjusted hospital mortality. We address this issue. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We analyzed the 1988 Medicare hospitalization data file (MEDPAR). We selected data on patients treated at the two Mayo Clinic-associated hospitals in Rochester, Minnesota, and a group of seven other hospitals that treat many patients from large geographic areas. These hospitals have had observed mortality rates substantially lower than those predicted by the HCFA model for the period 1987-1990. STUDY DESIGN: Using the multiple logistic regression model applied by HCFA to the 1988 data, we evaluated the relationship between distance from patient residence to the admitting hospital and risk-adjusted hospital mortality. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among patients admitted to Mayo Rochester-affiliated hospitals, residence outside Olmsted County, Minnesota was independently associated with a 33 percent lower 30-day mortality rate (p < .001) than that associated with residence in Olmsted County. When patients at Mayo hospitals were stratified by residence (Olmsted County versus non-Olmsted County), the observed mortality was similar to that predicted for community patients (9.6 percent versus 10.2 percent, p = .26), whereas hospital mortality for referral patients was substantially lower than predicted (5.0 percent versus 7.5 percent, p = < .001). After incorporation of the HCFA risk adjustment methods, distance from patient residence to the hospitals was also independently associated with mortality among the Mayo Rochester-affiliated hospitals and seven other referral center hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The HCFA Medicare hospital mortality model should be used with extreme caution to evaluate hospital quality of care for national referral centers because of residual confounding due to severity of illness factors associated with geographic referral that are inadequately captured in the extant prediction model.     

A regional evaluation of variation in low-severity hospital admissions

OBJECTIVE: Determine patient and hospital-level variation in proportions of low-severity admissions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Thirty hospitals in a large metropolitan region. PATIENTS: A total of 43,209 consecutive eligible patients discharged in 1991 through 1993 with congestive heart failure (n = 25,213) or pneumonia (n = 17,995). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Admission severity of illness was measured from validated multivariable models that estimated the risk of in-hospital death; models were based on clinical data abstracted from patients' medical records. Admissions were categorized as "low severity" if the predicted risk of death was less than 1%. Nearly 15% of patients (n = 6,382) were categorized as low-severity admissions. Compared with other patients, low-severity admissions were more likely (p < .001) to be nonwhite and to have Medicaid or be uninsured. Low-severity admissions had shorter median length of stay (4 vs 7 days; p < .001), but accounted for 10% of the total number of hospital days. For congestive heart failure, proportions of low-severity admissions across hospitals ranged from 10% to 25%; 12 hospitals had rates that were significantly different (p < .01) than the overall rate of 17%. For pneumonia, proportions ranged from 3% to 22%; 12 hospitals had rates different from the overall rate of 12%. Variation across hospitals remained after adjusting for patient sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of low-severity admissions for congestive heart failure and pneumonia varied across hospitals and were higher among nonwhite and poorly insured patients. Although the current study does not identify causes of this variability, possible explanations include differences in access to ambulatory services, decisions to admit patients for clinical indications unrelated to the risk of hospital mortality, and variability in admission practices of individual physicians and hospitals. The development of protocols for ambulatory management of low-severity patients and improvement of access to outpatient care would most likely decrease the utilization of more costly hospital services.     

Preliminary report of data collection in hospital quality assurance programs--a project of the Association of Hospitals of the Czech Republic

OBJECTIVES: This was the first attempt of the association representing all acute care hospitals in the Czech Republic to collect mutual data which might be used for quality assurance (QA) purposes and which might lead to the development of national standards of care which could be used for hospital accreditation. Data collected included information which was available universally and which could be measured; in addition, information was intended to be similar in each hospital. In most cases, the data collection systems were based on financial information and data had to be identified which might be used for QA purposes, rather than being able to design a system specific for QA purposes. DESIGN: Since the hospital payment system was established in 1992, hospitals have had to develop data collection systems to measure clinical activity; this current study was based on this data collection, adapted to QA purposes. SETTING: The Executive Committee of the Hospital Association agreed to a pilot study of hospitals in 1993; data were collected from approximately 40 hospitals, beginning in 1994. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Hospitals were chosen based on their ability to collect data and participate in the program, and it was determined that there should be variability in the hospitals, in size, location and activities, but that the data collected should be generic. INTERVENTIONS: Raw data included 33 different items, most of which were irrelevant to QA. Using a computer program, various combinations of data were reviewed and evaluated to ascertain the most appropriate for QA purposes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were chosen for study which included (a) data from the largest departments in the individual hospitals; (b) length of stay for patients hospitalized in these departments; (c) number of occupied beds/physician in the department and (d) mortality/1000 admissions to the department. RESULTS: The combination of (1) a long length of stay; (2) a high occupied bed/doctor ratio; and (3) a high mortality rate/1000 admissions might be indicators of poor quality. Additional factors to consider include: the type of department-emergency, cancer, geriatric, etc.; the nature of the medical activity-acute, referral, primary care, etc.; whether or not "social" beds are included and, generally, comparability among departments. However, as a pilot study, certain indicators can be determined which then can be used for future study to determine quality of care. The ability to cooperate and collect seemingly comparable data indicates reason for optimism in the future; more detailed and accurate studies can be carried out which will enable assessment of the quality of care given in comparable situations in hospitals throughout the Czech Republic.     

Do "America's Best Hospitals" perform better for acute myocardial infarction?

BACKGROUND: "America's Best Hospitals," an influential list published annually by U.S. News and World Report, assesses the quality of hospitals. It is not known whether patients admitted to hospitals ranked at the top in cardiology have lower short-term mortality from acute myocardial infarction than those admitted to other hospitals or whether differences in mortality are explained by differential use of recommended therapies. METHODS: Using data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project on 149,177 elderly Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction in 1994 or 1995, we examined the care and outcomes of patients admitted to three types of hospitals: those ranked high in cardiology (top-ranked hospitals); hospitals not in the top rank that had on-site facilities for cardiac catheterization, coronary angioplasty, and bypass surgery (similarly equipped hospitals); and the remaining hospitals (non-similarly equipped hospitals). We compared 30-day mortality; the rates of use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and reperfusion; and the relation of differences in rates of therapy to short-term mortality. RESULTS: Admission to a top-ranked hospital was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.87; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.00; P=0.05 for top-ranked hospitals vs. the others). Among patients without contraindications to therapy, top-ranked hospitals had significantly higher rates of use of aspirin (96.2 percent, as compared with 88.6 percent for similarly equipped hospitals and 83.4 percent for non-similarly equipped hospitals; P<0.01) and beta-blockers (75.0 percent vs. 61.8 percent and 58.7 percent, P<0.01), but lower rates of reperfusion therapy (61.0 percent vs. 70.7 percent and 65.6 percent, P=0.03). The survival advantage associated with admission to top-ranked hospitals was less strong after we adjusted for factors including the use of aspirin and beta-blockers (odds ratio, 0.94; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.08; P=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Admission to a hospital ranked high on the list of "America's Best Hospitals" was associated with lower 30-day mortality among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. A substantial portion of the survival advantage may be associated with these hospitals' higher rates of use of aspirin and beta-blocker therapy.     

Annual league tables of mortality in neonatal intensive care units: longitudinal study. International Neonatal Network and the Scottish Neonatal Consultants and Nurses Collaborative Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether crude league tables of mortality and league tables of risk adjusted mortality accurately reflect the performance of hospitals. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of mortality occurring in hospital. SETTING: 9 neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 2671 very low birth weight or preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units between 1988 and 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude hospital mortality and hospital mortality adjusted using the clinical risk index for babies (CRIB) score. RESULTS: Hospitals had wide and overlapping confidence intervals when ranked by mortality in annual league tables; this made it impossible to discriminate between hospitals reliably. In most years there was no significant difference between hospitals, only random variation. The apparent performance of individual hospitals fluctuated substantially from year to year. CONCLUSIONS: Annual league tables are not reliable indicators of performance or best practice; they do not reflect consistent differences between hospitals. Any action prompted by the annual league tables would have been equally likely to have been beneficial, detrimental, or irrelevant. Mortality should be compared between groups of hospitals using specific criteria-such as differences in the volume of patients, staffing policy, training of staff, or aspects of clinical practice-after adjusting for risk. This will produce more reliable estimates with narrower confidence intervals, and more reliable and rapid conclusions.     

Traumatic subdural pneumocephalus causing rise in intracranial pressure in the early phase of head trauma: report of two cases

The mortality rate is high and prognosis is worse among new-borns with prenatal diagnosis of heart malformation, mainly due to factors such as its association with other malformations, and a range of more severe diseases probably resulting from the predominance of the obstetric use of the four chamber view. In this study we retrospectively assessed the range of cardiopathies diagnosed by foetal echocardiography and their evolution, compared with previous years. From January 1994 to December 1995, 1173 foetal echocardiograms were performed at a gestation age of 24 weeks. Sixty-one foetuses (5.2%) had cardiac anomalies, structural in 56 and arrhythmia in 5. The risks and indications were maternal in 37%, foetal in 31%, familial in 17% and environmental in 15%. Three were false negatives (VSD:2; truncus arteriosus: 1). Five died in utero, and 18 were assessed after birth with a mean gestational age of 37 weeks and birth weight of 3 Kg, a caesarean section was performed in 9. All but one were born in central hospitals. Six children were operated on. Two children died, one after surgery. Compared with the four previous years of activity, indication due to foetal risk rose from 6 to 31%, the number of cases diagnosed with heart disease increased from 14 to 30 per year, and the mortality decreased from 59 to 11%. Despite this, we still observe that the vast majority of new-borns who are hospitalised due to a severe heart disease had no prenatal diagnosis, indicating the need to continue our educational policy in this field.     

Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports

OBJECTIVES: Quality report cards are becoming increasingly more common and receive much publicity. They can have significant impact on competition among providers, costs, and quality of health care. The authors test the hypotheses that hospitals and surgeons with better outcomes reported in the NYS Cardiac Surgery Reports experience a relative increase in their market share and prices. METHODS: Information from the New York State Cardiac Surgery Reports was linked with physicians' claims submitted to Medicare and was used to calculate market shares and average prices for hospitals and physicians performing CABG surgeries. Regression models were estimated to test hypotheses. All 30 hospitals offering coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were studied as well as a majority of surgeons (114 or approximately 80%) performing CABG surgery in New York State during the 1990-1993 period. RESULTS: Findings indicate that hospitals and physicians with better outcomes experienced higher rates of growth in market shares. Physicians with better outcomes also had higher rates of growth in charges for this procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients (and referring physicians) seem to respond to information about quality of individual surgeons and hospitals as expected. The magnitude of the association between reported mortality and market shares varies geographically, potentially reflecting differences in sociodemographic characteristics. The association tends to decline over time, suggesting that it is primarily due to "new" information.     

Differences in pediatric ICU mortality risk over time

OBJECTIVES: To compare pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) mortality risk using models from two distinct time periods; and to discuss the implications of changing mortality risk for severity systems and quality-of-care assessment. DATA SOURCES AND SETTING: Consecutive admissions (n = 10,833) from 16 pediatric ICUs across the United States that participate in the Pediatric Critical Care Study Group were recorded prospectively. Data collection occurred during a 12-mo period beginning in January 1993. METHODS: Data collection for the development and validation of the original Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score occurred from 1980 to 1985. The original PRISM coefficients were used to calculate mortality probabilities in the current data set. Updated estimates of mortality probabilities were calculated, using coefficients from a logistic regression analysis using the original PRISM variable set. Quality-of-care tests were performed using standardized mortality ratios. RESULTS: Risk of mortality from pediatric ICU admission improved considerably between the two periods. Overall, the reduction in mortality risk averaged 15% (p < .001). Analysis of mortality risk by age indicated a large improvement for younger infants. The mortality risk for infants <1 mo improved by 39% (p < .001). Mortality risk improved by 28% (p < .001) for infants between 1 and 12 mos. Analysis of mortality risk by principal diagnosis indicated substantial improvement in respiratory diseases, including respiratory diseases developing in the perinatal period. The mortality risk for respiratory diseases improved by 45% (p < .001). The improvement in mortality risk substantially deteriorated the calibration of the original PRISM severity system (p < .001). As a result of changing mortality risk, the standardized mortality ratios across the 16 pediatric ICUs demonstrated substantial disparities, depending on the choice of models. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents differences in pediatric ICU risk of mortality over time that are consistent with a general improvement in the quality of pediatric intensive care. Despite continued widespread use of the original PRISM, recent improvements in pediatric ICU quality of care have negated its usefulness for many intended applications, including quality-of-care assessment.     

Lung abscess caused by Paecilomyces lilacinus

AIM: To present characteristics of heart and great vessel injuries in patients wounded during the 1992-1994 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina and their management in conditions of lack of complex diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of 31 patients treated for cardiac and great vessel injuries at the Department of Surgery, Tuzla University Hospital, between January 1992 and December 1994. RESULTS: The most frequent localization of the injuries was the right and left ventricles (each 10 cases), left atrium in 5, superior caval vein in 5, and inferior caval vein in 5 cases. Isolated pericardial injury was found in 5 cases. Immediately after injury, 22 injured suffered from shock, 7 from pericardial tamponade, and 2 were in a stable state. The mortality rate was 58%. Eight patients died during the operation as a consequence of bleeding. The highest mortality rate was recorded in the injuries of the left ventricle followed by the injuries of the in right ventricle and of superior caval vein. All 4 patients with multiple heart and great vessel injuries died. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who suffered from shock than in those who suffered from tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating war injuries of heart and great vessels are among the most serious injuries in war. These injuries require prompt treatment to save life, but this is hardly manageable in hospitals without cardiopulmonary bypass facilities.     

A national study of postoperative mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting in Israel. ISCAB Consortium. Israel Coronary Artery Bypass Study

BACKGROUND: Investigation of observed differences in outcomes among medical centers is of major interest to the medical community and the public and has a substantial impact on efforts to improve the quality of medical care. METHODS: This study analyzed data from consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at 14 medical centers. Data included demographic and clinical information, comorbidity, cardiac catheterization results, and 30-day postoperative vitality status. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with mortality. An outlier hospital was defined as one having an observed mortality outside the 95% confidence interval boundaries around the expected mortality rate calculated, given the patient risk factors. RESULTS: The overall crude 30-day mortality rate for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting among the 4,835 patients in this study was 3.1%. The rate varied among centers, ranging from 0.85% to 7.05%. Predictors of 30-day mortality included advanced age, female sex, diabetes mellitus, poor left ventricular function, high creatinine level, high priority of operation, and three-vessel disease (with or without left main coronary artery disease). After adjustment for risk factors, two hospitals were defined as outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The observed disparity in early mortality among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is not due solely to differences in case mix.     

Heart surgery in the elderly

The number of octogenarian patients undergoing an open heart procedure in our unit is the fastest increasing group of patients. Between June 1985 and July 1994 112 octogenarians (mean age 81.7 years, 60 males, 52 females) underwent cardiac operations. The postoperative course was uneventful in 90 patients (80.4%). The perioperative mortality rate was 8.9% (10 patients). Mortality was lowest in the group receiving aortic valve replacement, with one death out of 30 patients (3.3%). The cause of death was left- or biventricular heart failure in more than half of the fatalities. Postoperative complications included: AV-block III (n = 1), postoperative bleeding (n = 2), unstable sternum (n = 3), acute cholecystitis (n = 1), low cardiac output syndrome (n = 1), stroke (n = 1), pneumothorax (n = 2) and urinary tract infections (n = 1). We consider open heart procedures in octogenarians, despite a mortality rate of 8.9%, as justified. According to the severity and course of clinical symptoms and the type of surgery required, selection of patients for operation should be decided on at an early stage of the disease. Not only life expectancy increases, but there is also a significant increase in life quality for these patients.     

Center-specific graft and patient survival rates: 1997 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) report

CONTEXT: Multiple comprehensive, risk-adjusted studies evaluating short-term surgical mortality have been reported previously. This report analyzes short-term and long-term outcomes, both nationally and at each individual transplant program, for all solid organ transplantations performed in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To report graft and patient survival rates for all solid organ transplantations, both nationally and at each specific transplant program in the United States, and to compare the expected survival rate with the actual survival rate of each individual program. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multivariate regression analysis of donor and recipient factors affecting graft and patient survival of all kidney, liver, pancreas, heart, lung, and heart-lung transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing from 742 separate transplant programs. PATIENTS: A cohort of 97587 solid organ transplantations performed on 92966 recipients in the United States from January 1988 through April 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term and conditional 3-year national and individual transplant program graft and patient survival rates overall and from 2 separate eras (era 1, January 1988-April 1992; era 2, May 1992-April 1994); comparison of actual center-specific performance with risk-adjusted expected performance and identification of centers with better-than-expected or worse-than-expected survival rates. RESULTS: One-year graft follow-up exceeded 98% and conditional 3-year follow-up exceeded 91% for all organs. Graft and patient survival improved significantly in era 2 compared with era 1 for all cadaver organs except heart, which remained the same. One-year cadaveric graft survival ranged from 81.5% for heart to 61.9% for heart-lung and 3-year conditional graft survival ranged from 91.3% for pancreas to 74.7% for lung. The percentage of programs whose actual 1-year graft survival was not different from or was better than their risk-adjusted expected survival ranged from 98.3% for heart-lung to 75.7% for liver. Most kidney, liver, and heart programs whose actual survival was significantly less than expected performed small numbers (less than the national average) of transplantations per year. CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival for solid organ transplantations showed improvement over time. Conditional 3-year graft and patient survival rates were approximately 90% for all organs except for lung and heart-lung. The conditional 3-year survival rates were better than 1-year survival rates, indicating the major risk after transplantation occurs in the first year. The majority of transplant programs achieved actual survival rates not significantly different from their expected survival rates. Center effects were most significant within the first year after transplantation and had much less influence on long-term survival outcomes.