Responses by king snakes (Lampropeltis getulus) to chemicals from colubrid and crotaline snakes

Four litters of king snakes (Lampropeltis getulus), a snake-eating species, were tested for responses to chemicals from colubrid and crotaline snakes. King snakes presented with swabs rubbed against the dorsal skin of living snakes and with swabs treated with methylene chloride extracts of shed snake skins tongue-flicked more to swabs from a northern copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix), a crotaline, than to swabs from some colubrid snakes or to blank swabs. Six out of 10 king snakes in one litter attacked and attempted to ingest swabs treated with snake skin chemicals, implicating these chemicals as feeding stimuli for these ophiophagous snakes. Ingestively naive king snakes presented with plain air and snake odors in an olfactometer tongue-flicked more to snake odors. This study and others suggest that crotaline and colubrid snakes can be distinguished by chemical cues.     

Following of conspecific and avoidance of predator chemical cues by pine snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus)

The ability of hatchling pine snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus) to follow or avoid the chemical trails of conspecifics and a king snake (Lampropeltis getulus) on paper substrates was investigated inY-maze experiments. Hatchlings entered the arm with the adult conspecific trail and avoided the arm containing the king snake trail at a frequency much greater than that due to chance. The data support the hypotheses that pine snakes follow the chemical trails of adult conspecifics and avoid the chemical trails of a predator.     

Effect of experience with pine (Pituophis melanoleucus) and king (Lampropeltis getulus) snake odors on Y-maze behavior of pine snake hatchlings

The abilities of hatchling pine snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus) and king snakes (Lampropeltis getulus) to discriminate the chemical trails of pine and king snakes was investigated inY-maze experiments. Pine snakes were housed for 17 days either with shavings impregnated with pine snake odor, king snake odor, or no odor to test for the effect of experience on choice. Both pine and king snake hatchlings entered the arm with the pine snake odor and did not enter the arm with the king snake odor. The data support the hypothesis that hatchlings of both species can distinguish conspecific odors from other odors and that our manipulation of previous experience was without effect for pine snake hatchlings.     

Predatory response of brown tree snakes to chemical stimuli from human skin

The brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis) is an exotic pest species on Pacific islands, most notably on Guam where it has caused considerable ecological and economic damage. On Guam, the snake commonly associates with people and can be found near or in human habitations. Bites are common, approximately 1 of 1200 emergency room visits to Guam hospitals were reported to be the result of B. irregularis bites; 80% of these victims were attacked while sleeping. Most of the attacks occurred on fingers and hands and the attacks appeared to be predatory, rather than defensive, in nature. In order to characterize the mechanism releasing this unusual behavior, we measured the predatory response of B. irregularis to chemical stimuli from humans and controls using a lab population that originated from Guam and a wild population from the species' native range in Queensland, Australia. To quantify behavior we measured the proportion of snakes displaying predatory behavior to each of the stimuli, the latency to attack, and the number of tongue-flicks displayed. We quantified predatory behavior using the tongue-flick attack score for repeated measures [TFAS(R)], a common method for quantifying predatory behavior in squamate reptiles. Captive brown tree snakes responded to human skin stimuli with feeding behavior, including predatory attacks, at the same frequency as they did to prey stimuli derived from mice, while never responding to controls with such behavior. Captive snakes also responded to human skin stimuli and prey stimuli with significantly higher TFAS(R) scores than to controls, although there were no differences between the human and mouse stimuli. Wild-caught animals in Australia also responded with predatory attacks to human skin stimuli, while not showing predatory behavior to a blank control and with higher TFAS(R) scores to human skin stimuli than to the control. As B. irregularis is a generalized predator that relies heavily on chemical signals to recognize prey, we hypothesize that the snakes recognize compounds on human skin that may be shared with other prey.     

Naive ophiophagus lizards recognize and avoid venomous snakes using chemical cues

Monitor lizards prey on snakes. Conversely, venomous snakes prey on juvenile monitor lizards. Immediately after hatching, monitor lizards are naive to all prey items, thus correct assessment of snake prey is paramount for survival. Experiments were conducted to determine how hatchling monitor lizards (Varanus albigularis) with no previous exposure to snakes reacted to sympatric venomous and nonvenomous snakes. Hatchling lizards attacked harmless snakes, but avoided venomous species. Lizards readily accepted meat from skinned snakes, regardless of species. When invertebrate prey covered with skin segments from venomous snakes were restrained from moving, they were usually investigated by tongue-flicking and rejected. Unrestrained skin-covered prey, however, were generally attacked and eaten without prior evaluation by tongue-flicking. Attack was inhibited in trials in which unrestrained prey were tongue-flicked, suggesting that chemical cues contained in snake skins mediate avoidance of venomous snakes. Selection for the ability to perceive snake integumental chemicals may be especially strong in species that both consume and are consumed by snakes.     

Responses by domestic cats (Felis catus) to snake scent gland secretions

The scent gland secretions of snakes are thought to repel predators, but few predator species have been tested for responses to these exudates. Domestic cats (Felis catus) were tested for responses to scent gland secretions of the gray rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta), or to choloroform extracts of them, applied to filter paper or food. More cats salivated or rubbed on filter papers treated with scent gland secretions than on control papers. Scent gland exudates elicited rubbing and pawing in cats more frequently than did chemicals from a shed snake skin. Cats offered food pieces treated either with water or with scent gland secretions ate fewer of the latter; this result is consistent with the hypothesis that scent gland secretions deter feeding.     

Chemoreceptive responses of two sympatric water snakes to extracts of commonly ingested prey species

Newborn of two locally sympatric species of water snakes,Nerodia fasciata andN. erythrogaster, were exposed to skin extracts of frequently ingested prey. In southern Louisiana, fish account for 78% of the diet of adultNerodia fasciata and about 15% forNerodia erythrogaster. Anurans comprise most of the remainder of the diets of these water snakes. Responses of naive individuals were compared to the chemoreceptive response profiles of groups of snakes reared on limited diets of fish and/or frogs. All snakes were tested seven times over a nine-month period and ontogenetic changes were apparent. NewbornNerodia fasciata have a strong chemoreceptive response for fish extract that remains unchanged by early dietary restrictions for the first six months of life. After that time their responses are more variable and can be altered by recent feeding experience. In southern Louisiana, this species is the least specialized water snake, an observation supported by these laboratory results. While newbornN. erythrogaster did not respond preferentially to any of the prey extracts, a significant response rate for fish extract is established by two months of age that persists for several months regardless of dietary restrictions. A subsequent shift of the response to frog extract at eight months of age regardless of diet may reflect a maturational process. Field studies are in agreement with these results and support the notion of ontogenetic changes related to predator size and age. This is the first demonstration of an ontogenetic change in chemoreceptive response that is not related to dietary experience.     

Volatile components in scent gland secretions of garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.)

Previous analyses of the scent gland secretions of snakes have focused on the nonvolatile components. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of secretions from North American garter snakes (Thamnophis butleri, T. couchi, T. elegans, T. melanogaster, andT. sirtalis) indicated the following seven major volatile components: acetic, propanoic, 2-methylpropanoic, butanoic, and 3-methylbutanoic acids, trimethylamine, and 2-piperidone. Five or more of these compounds were observed in secretions of select boid, colubrid, pythonid, and viperid snakes, suggesting that they are widespread scent gland products. 3-Methylbutanal also was detected in some snake species.     

A complex,cross-taxon,chemical releaser of antipredator behavior in amphibians

Prey species show diverse antipredator responses to chemical cues signaling predation threat. Among terrestrial vertebrates, the red-backed salamander, Plethodon cinereus, is an important species in the study of these chemical defenses. During the day and early evening, this species avoids rinses from garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis, independent of snake diet, but late at night, avoids only those rinses from garter snakes that have recently eaten P. cinereus. We tested whether the selective, late-night response requires the ingestion or injury of salamanders. In three experiments, we tested P. cinereus for their responses to separate or combined rinses from salamanders (undisturbed, distressed, and injured P. cinereus) and snakes (unfed, earthworm fed, and salamander-fed T. sirtalis). When paired against a water control, only rinses from salamander-fed snakes were avoided. When salamander treatments (undisturbed or distressed) were combined with the snake treatments (unfed or earthworm-fed) and tested against a water control, the combinations elicited avoidance. When selected treatments were paired against the standard rinse from salamander-fed snakes, only the combined rinses from salamanders and snakes nullified the avoidance response to the standard rinse. These data reveal a prey defense mechanism involving chemical elements from both the predator and prey that does not require injury or ingestion of the prey in the formation of the cue.     

Discriminative Response to Animal, But Not Plant, Chemicals by an Insectivorous, Actively Foraging Lizard, Scincella lateralis, and Differential Response to Surface and Internal Prey Cues

Responses by the insectivorous, actively foraging scincid lizard, Scincella lateralis, to chemical cues from a plant food favored by herbivorous lizards, its ability to discriminate prey chemicals from control substances, and its relative response to internal and surface prey chemicals were studied experimentally. We presented chemical cues to the lizards on cotton swabs and recorded their tongue-flicks and biting attacks on the swabs. The lizards exhibited significantly greater tongue-flick rates and biting frequencies to prey surface cues than to plant surface chemicals from romaine lettuce, diluted cologne (pungency control), and deionized water. Responses to the plant stimuli did not differ from those to the two control stimuli, in contrast with strong responses to the same plant cues by herbivores. This finding provides the first information suggesting that chemosensory response may be adapted to diet, with responsiveness to plant stimuli evolving de novo in herbivores. Biting and tongue-flicking responses were significantly greater to cricket chemicals than to all other stimuli, among which there were no differences. Thus, the lizards are capable of prey chemical discrimination, which may be ubiquitous among actively foraging lizards. The lizards exhibited more frequent biting and higher tongue-flick rates to internal than surface prey chemicals. Although different methods of stimulus preparation are appropriate for different purposes, we conclude that prey surface chemicals available to foraging lizards are most desirable for studies bearing on location and identification of prey.     

Responses by canids to scent gland secretions of the western diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox)

Many snakes discharge malodorous fluids from paired scent glands in the base of the tail when they are disturbed. A number of authors suggest that these secretions repel predators. Scent gland secretions of the western diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox), or dichloromethane extracts of them, were presented to coyotes (Canis latrans) in three field tests, and to domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) in two kennel tests, to determine whether responses of possible benefit to snakes are elicited. Free-ranging coyotes visited and rubbed and rolled at stations containing scent gland secretions in perforated plastic capsules more frequently than at those containing untreated or dichloromethane-treated capsules. Responses to dichloromethane extracts of scent gland secretions subjected to rotary evaporation were not significantly different from those to dichloromethane. Pure and mixed breeds of dogs presented with filter papers treated with dichloromethane or a dichloromethane extract of scent gland secretions mouthed (licked, bit, or ate) secretion-treated papers more frequently. Staffordshire terriers presented with filter papers treated with dichloromethane or dichloromethane extracts of snake scent gland and alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) paracloacal gland secretions exhibited urination postures to snake secretion-treated papers more frequently than to dichloromethane-treated papers, but responses to snake- and alligator-treated papers did not differ significantly. There was no indication that canids are repelled by scent gland secretions.     

Responses to major categories of food chemicals by the lizard Podarcis lilfordi

Many lizards are capable of identifying food using only chemical cues from food surfaces, but almost nothing is known about the types of compounds that are effective stimuli. We experimentally studied lingual and biting responses by a lacertid lizard, Podarcis lilfordi, to single representatives of three major categories of food chemicals, sucrose as a carbohydrate, pure pork fat as a mixture of lipids, and bovine gamma globulin as a protein. In 60-sec trials in which stimuli were presented on cotton swabs, the lizards detected all three stimuli, exhibiting more tongue-flicks, licks, or bites, or a greater tongue-flick attack score (TFAS; overall measure of response strength to prey stimuli) than to deionized water. The initial response to all stimuli was tongue-flicking, but the lizards discriminated among the types of chemical stimuli. After preliminary tongue-flicks, the lizards responded to sucrose solutions by licking at high rates, to pure pork fat by biting, and to protein by a combination of additional tongue-flicks and biting. Biting is a feeding response to prey or solid plant material. Licking is a feeding response to sugars in nectar or ripe fruit. Its frequency increased with sucrose concentration. Our data suggest that lizards can identify several types of chemicals associated with food and direct feeding attempts to sources of such chemicals in the absence of visual cues.     

Purification and preliminary characterization of a frog-derived proteinaceous chemoattractant eliciting prey attack by checkered garter snakes (Thamnophis marcianus)

A potent proteinaceous chemoattractant, eliciting prey attack by checkered garter snakes (Thamnophis marcianus) was isolated from aqueous washes of the common frogRana temporaria and purified by preparative continuous-elution electrophoresis. The biological activity of the frog crude extract or of the purified chemoattractive protein, measured by a snake bioassay, was unaffected by freezing, lyophilization, or dialysis but was lost after proteolytic digestion. The purified chemoattractant is glycosylated, has an apparent molecular mass of 24 kDa, estimated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS-PAGE), and a pI of 4.8. It gave one spot in two-dimensional electrophoresis. The bioassay showed that this protein is highly attractive to snakes. The lowest concentration yielding positive responses in the snake bioassay was approximately 25 µg/ml. These results suggest that a water-soluble Mr 24 kDa glycoprotein molecule produced by the common frog may be a vomeronasal stimulus used by checkered garter snakes for prey recognition.     

Discrimination of Prey, But Not Plant, Chemicals by Actively Foraging, Insectivorous Lizards, the Lacertid Takydromus sexlineatus and the Teiid Cnemidophorus gularis

Sampling environmental chemicals to reveal prey and predators and to provide information about conspecifics is highly developed in lizards. Actively foraging lizards can discriminate between prey chemicals and control stimuli, but ambush foragers do not exhibit prey chemical discrimination. Recent experiments on a few species of herbivorous lizards have also demonstrated an ability to identify plant food chemicals. We studied chemosensory responses to chemicals from prey and palatable plants in two species of actively foraging, insectivorous lizards. Both the lacertid Takydromus sexlineatus and the teiid Cnemidophorus gularis exhibited strong responses to prey chemicals, but not to plant chemicals. These findings increase confidence in the relationship between prey chemical discrimination and foraging mode, which is based on data for very few species per family. They also provide data showing that actively foraging insectivores in two families do not respond strongly to plant cues. Such information is essential for eventual comparative studies of the relationship between plant diet and responses to food chemicals. The traditional method of presenting stimuli by using hand-held cotton swabs worked well for T. sexlineatus but could not be used for C. gularis due to repeated escape attempts. When stimuli were presented to C. gularis on ceramic tiles and no experimenter was visible, the lizards responded readily. Presentation of stimuli on tiles in the absence of a visible experimenter may be a valuable approach to study of food chemical discrimination by active foragers in which antipredatory behavior interferes with responses to swabs.     

Population and sex differences in antipredator responses of breeding fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) to chemical stimuli from garter snakes (Thamnophis radix andT. sirtalis)

We conducted a predator bite survey on a population of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) considered to be under substantial predation pressure by western plains garter snakes (Thamnophis radix). Scarring, due to failed predation attempts by garter snakes and crayfish (Orconectes virilis), was observed significantly more often in breeding males than in breeding females and nonbreeding minnows. Likely, territorial nest defense under the edges of rocks along the water's edge, a habitat occupied by crayfish and frequented by snakes, caused the breeding males to be differentially vulnerable to predation. Under controlled laboratory conditions, breeding males from this population exhibited an antipredator response to chemical stimuli from live snakes (T. sirtalis andT. radix) significantly more often than breeding female minnows from the same population and breeding minnows of both sexes from a population that was presumed to be under lower predation pressure from snakes.     

Responses of ecologically dissimilar populations of the water snakeNatrix s. sipedon to chemical cues from prey

Three populations of the water snake,Natrix s. sipedon, were tested for their responses to surface water extracts prepared from various prey species. It was clearly shown that these snakes can distinguish between different prey genera on the basis of chemical cues alone. Adult snakes caught at a fish hatchery where goldfish (Carassius auratus) were abundant responded most to goldfish extract, as did laboratory-born snakes reared on goldfish for one year. However, snakes caught in a relatively undisturbed mountain stream environment and naive young born to a mountain female responded more to the extracts of various sympatric-mountain fish and amphibians. The evidence indicates that newborn snakes have genetic predispositions for sympatric species of the classes of prey normally eaten. These preferences can be enhanced or inhibited during ontogeny.     

Correspondence Between Diet and Food Chemical Discriminations by Omnivorous Geckos (Rhacodactylus)

Chemosensory responses to food are correlated with geographic variation in diet of some colubrid snakes, but the influence of diet on chemosensory behavior has not been established generally in snakes or lizards. Most lizards are generalist predators of small animals, making it difficult to study effects of diet, but herbivory and omnivory have evolved in several lineages, providing an excellent opportunity to study the effects of dietary change on chemosensory behavior. Based on ecological considerations, I argue that inclusion of plants in the diet of lizards that evolved from ambush foragers lacking prey chemical discrimination might be expected to evolve responsiveness to plant food chemicals. If animal prey also are retained in the diet, then responsiveness to prey chemicals should evolve as well. I experimentally studied tongue-flicking and biting responses by omnivorous geckos of the genus Rhacodactylus to chemical stimuli from plant and animal foods and control substances presented on cotton swabs. The lizards exhibited significantly greater responses to plant stimuli than to control stimuli. One of two species tested responded strongly to cricket chemicals, but the other showed no significant response to mouse surface chemical stimuli. The results support the hypothesis that dietary shifts induce corresponding changes in chemosensory response, but establishment of correlated evolution between diet and food chemical discriminations in lizards will require study of many herbivores/omnivores and insectivores as controls.     

Chemosensory predator recognition in the lizardPodarcis hispanica: Effects of predation pressure relaxation

We compared the behavior of two subspecies ofPodarcis hispanica lizards in cages that had been chemically marked by a saurophagous snake, the viperVipera latastei. One of the subspecies (P.h. atrata) has experienced a relaxation from predation pressure by this viper, as snakes were eradicated from the island it inhabits over 100 years ago. Nevertheless, individuals fromP.h. atrata responded to the snake's chemicals similarly to individuals from a population ofP.h. hispanica, currently sympatric withV. latastei. Lizards exhibited more stress-indicating behaviors (foot shakes, tail vibrations, sudden starts), became less mobile, and tongue-flicked more while moving in a snake-inhabited terrarium than when in a clean, unfamiliar terrarium.     

Elevation in tongue-flick rate after biting prey in the broad-headed skink,Eumeces laticeps

A postbite elevation in tongue-flicking (PETF) rate occurs in adult male broad-headed skinks,Eumeces laticeps. Males having bitten neonatal mice showed significantly higher tongue-flicking rates in the 2 min following experimental removal of the prey than did males in several control conditions. In a second experiment designed to separate the effects of tactile and chemical stimulation of the oral cavity during biting, males tongue-flicked at significantly higher rates in response to swabs bearing surface chemicals from neonatal mice than to identical swabs lacking the surface chemicals. These findings agree with previous data showing that PETF and searching movements occur in those families of lizards that can detect prey chemicals and use the tongue to do so during active foraging. The occurrence of PETF and putative searching movements supports the interpretation that PETF represents an attempt to relocate lost prey by chemosensory means. PETF was much briefer inE. laticeps than in many snakes and in a representative species from another lizard family and was not detectable after the first minute. This brevity is consistent with the prediction that PETF should be brief in squamates that feed on prey not likely to be located by scent-trailing.     

Epicuticular Wax Chemicals in Zea mays Influence Oviposition in Ostrinia nubilalis

The chemical basis of oviposition elicitation in a generalist herbivore was determined by examination of oviposition responses in Ostrinia nubilalis to corn (Zea mays) chemicals in two-choice laboratory bioassays. A pentane extract of corn leaves stimulated oviposition and the activity persisted for three days, indicating that oviposition in O. nubilalis is elicited by low-volatility chemicals. Chemicals in the extract were fractionated by column chromatography on Florisil, using a sequence of solvents of increasing polarity. Bioassays of Florisil fractions indicated that the stimulants were eluted with nonpolar solvents. Positive bioassay results with an extract prepared by dipping corn leaves in pentane for 20 sec for extraction of leaf surface chemicals suggested that some of the active material was present in the leaf epicuticle. Gas chromatographic analyses and comparisons with retention times of standards suggested the presence of several n-alkanes in the dip extract. Five n-alkanes—hexacosane, heptacosane, octacosane, nonacosane, and tritriacontane—known to be present in the epicuticle of corn leaves were bioassayed, and all five elicited oviposition responses. These results suggest that oviposition elicitation in O. nubilalis is influenced by the presence of n-alkanes in the host plant epicuticle.