Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis

Existing methods for generating common weights in data envelopment analysis (DEA) are either very complicated or unable to produce a full ranking for decision making units (DMUs). This paper proposes a new methodology based on regression analysis to seek a common set of weights that are easy to estimate and can produce a full ranking for DMUs. The DEA efficiencies obtained with the most favorable weights to each DMU are treated as the target efficiencies of DMUs and are best fitted with the efficiencies determined by common weights. Two new nonlinear regression models are constructed to optimally estimate the common weights. Four numerical examples are examined using the developed new models to test their discrimination power and illustrate their potential applications in fully ranking DMUs. Comparisons with a similar compromise approach for generating common weights are also discussed.     

Common weights data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: A robust optimization approach

One of the primary issues on data envelopment analysis (DEA) models is the reduction of weights flexibility. There are literally several studies to determine common weights in DEA but none of them considers uncertainty in data. This paper introduces a robust optimization approach to find common weights in DEA with uncertain data. The uncertainty is considered in both inputs and outputs and a suitable robust counterpart of DEA model is developed. The proposed robust DEA model is solved and the ideal solution is found for each decision making units (DMUs). Then, the common weights are found for all DMUs by utilizing the goal programming technique. To illustrate the performance of the proposed model, a numerical example is solved. Also, the proposed model of this paper is implemented by using some actual data from provincial gas companies in Iran.     

A full ranking methodology in data envelopment analysis based on a set of dummy decision making units

In this paper, we propose a new methodology for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Our approach is a benchmarking method, seeks a common set of weights using a proposed linear programming model and is based on the TOPSIS approach in multiple attribute decision making (MADM). To this end, five artificial or dummy decision making units (DMUs) are defined, the ideal DMU (IDMU), the anti-ideal DMU (ADMU), the right ideal DMU (RIDMU), the left anti-ideal DMU (LADMU) and the average DMU (AVDMU). We form two comprehensive indexes for the AVDMU called the Left Relative Closeness (LRC) and the Right Relative Closeness (RRC) with respect to the RIDMU and LADMU. The LRC and RRC indexes will be used in the new proposed linear programming model to estimate the common set of weights, the new efficiency of DMUs and finally an overall ranking for all the DMUs. The change of the ratio between LRC and RRC indexes is capable to be provoked alternative rankings. One of the best advantages of this model is that we can make a rationale ranking which is demonstrated by the realized correlation analysis. Also, the new proposed efficiency score of the DMUs is close to the efficiency score of the DEA (CCR) methodology. Three numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applicability of the new approach and the effectiveness of the new approach in DEA ranking in comparison with other conventional ranking methods. Also, an "error" analysis proves the robustness of the proposed methodology.     

A new method based on the dispersion of weights in data envelopment analysis

One of the drawbacks of the data envelopment analysis (DEA) is the problem of lack of discrimination among efficient decision making units (DMUs) and hence yielding many numbers of DMUs as efficient. The main purpose of this study is to overcome this inability. In the case in which the minimization of the coefficient of variation (CV) for input–output weights is added to the DEA model, more reasonable and more homogeneous input–output weights are obtained. For this new proposed model based on the CV it is observed that the number of efficient DMUs is reduced, improving the discrimination power. When this new approach is applied to two well-known examples in the literature, and a real-world data of OECD countries, it has been seen that the new model yielded a more balanced dispersion of input–output weights and reduced the number of efficient DMUs. In addition, the applicability of the new model is tested by a simulation study.     

Improving the discrimination power and weights dispersion in the data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been a very popular method for measuring and benchmarking relative efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs) with multiple input and outputs. Beside of its popularity, DEA has some drawbacks such as unrealistic input–output weights and lack of discrimination among efficient DMUs. In this study, two new models based on a multi-criteria data envelopment analysis (MCDEA) are developed to moderate the homogeneity of weights distribution by using goal programming (GP). These goal programming data envelopment analysis models, GPDEA-CCR and GPDEA-BCC, also improve the discrimination power of DEA.     

A new DEA approach to fully rank DMUs with an application to MBA programs

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be used to evaluate the efficiencies of decision‐making units (DMUs) in various areas like education, healthcare, and energy. Several DEA methods are proposed for this purpose; however, some of these methods cannot provide a full ranking and others often overlook some considerations that arise with special characteristics of DMUs. We propose a new DEA‐based approach to achieve a full ranking of DMUs. Our approach takes various issues into account such as the initial efficiency score of the DMU, the DMUs that should be removed from the set for it to become efficient (if any) and its effects on the efficiency scores of other DMUs. We demonstrate the shortcomings of several other DEA methods and discuss how our approach overcomes these. We apply our approach to evaluate 50 MBA programs from Financial Times 2018 rankings and compare the results with the evaluations of other methods. As opposed to some methods, our approach has the advantage of differentiating between all efficient DMUs as well as inefficient ones. In addition, the results demonstrate that we can achieve a consistent ranking that considers different aspects of the problem setting. The generated scores are also used to sort DMUs in classes of preference.     

A new data envelopment analysis method for ranking decision making units: an application in industrial parks

Relative efficiency of decision‐making units (DMUs) is assessed by classical data envelopment analysis (DEA) models. DEA is a popular technique for efficiency evaluation. There might be a couple of efficient DMUs. Classical DEA models cannot fully rank efficient DMUs. In this paper, a novel technique for fully ranking all DMUs based on changing reference set using a single virtual inefficient DMU is proposed. To this end, the first concept of virtual DMU is defined as average of all inefficient DMUs. Virtual DMU is a proxy of all inefficient DMUs. This new method proposes a new ranking method that takes into account impact of efficient DMUs on virtual DMU and impact of efficient DMUs on influences of other efficient DMUs. A case study is given to show applicability of the proposed approach.     

Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model

In this paper, the cross efficiency evaluation method, regarded as a DEA extension tool, is firstly reviewed for its utilization in identifying the Decision Making Unit (DMU) with the best practice and ranking the DMUs by their respective cross-efficiency scores. However, we then point out that the main drawback of the method lies in non-uniqueness of cross-efficiency scores resulted from the presence of alternate optima in traditional DEA models, obviously making it become less effective. Aiming at the research gap, a weight-balanced DEA model is proposed to lessen large differences in weighted data (weighted inputs and weighted outputs) and to effectively reduce the number of zero weights for inputs and outputs. Finally, we use two examples of the literature to illustrate the performance of this approach and discuss some issues of interest regarding the choosing of weights in cross-efficiency evaluations.     

Optimal direct mailing modelling based on data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a mathematical programming technique that is frequently used for measuring and benchmarking efficiency of the homogenous decision‐making units (DMUs). This paper proposes a new use of DEA for customers scoring and particularly their direct mailing modelling. Moreover, because DEA models suffer from some weaknesses, that is, unrealistic weighting scheme of the inputs and outputs and incomplete ranking among efficient DMUs, the present paper compares different ways of solving these problems and concludes that common set of weights method, as a result of some advantages, outperforms other procedures.     

The voting analytic hierarchy process method for discriminating among efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis

Making optimal use of available resources has always been of interest to humankind, and different approaches have been used in an attempt to make maximum use of existing resources. Limitations of capital, manpower, energy, etc., have led managers to seek ways for optimally using such resources. In fact, being informed of the performance of the units under the supervision of a manager is the most important task with regard to making sensible decisions for managing them. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) suggests an appropriate method for evaluating the efficiency of homogeneous units with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. DEA models classify decision making units (DMUs) into efficient and inefficient ones. However, in most cases, managers and researchers are interested in ranking the units and selecting the best DMU. Various scientific models have been proposed by researchers for ranking DMUs. Each of these models has some weakness(es), which makes it difficult to select the appropriate ranking model. This paper presents a method for ranking efficient DMUs by the voting analytic hierarchy process (VAHP). The paper reviews some ranking models in DEA and discusses their strengths and weaknesses. Then, we provide the method for ranking efficient DMUs by VAHP. Finally we give an example to illustrate our approach and then the new method is employed to rank efficient units in a real world problem.     

Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis under prospect theory

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a data‐driven tool for performance evaluation, measuring decision‐making units (DMUs) and designating them with specific weightings. The standard DEA model typically sets up that decision‐makers (DMs) are wholly rational to select the most favourable weights to obtain the maximum performance score, but does not take into account their attitude toward risk during the assessment. The prospect theory generally matches humans' psychological behaviours. Thus, our study captures the non‐rational behaviours of DMs, performing under risk scenarios, in order to construct a novel common‐weights DEA model that maximizes the total prospect value, which can vary more steeply for losses than for gains, hence obtaining a more realistic common weight scheme. Our proposed model not only generates DMUs, with higher total prospect values, but also greater degrees of satisfaction. The current study shows that the prospect theory can be aptly extended to the DEA research area, supplying a proper guideline for future DEA research.     

DEA efficiency analysis: A DEA approach with double frontiers

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring efficiency of peer decision-making units (DMUs). Conventional DEA evaluates the performance of each DMU using a set of most favourable weights. As a result, traditional DEA models can be considered methods for the analysis of the best relative efficiency or analysis of the optimistic efficiency. DEA efficient DMUs obtained from conventional DEA models create an efficient production frontier. Traditional DEA can be used to identify units with good performance in the most desirable scenarios. There is a similar approach that evaluates the performance indicators of each DMU using a set of most unfavourable weights. Accordingly, such models can be considered models for analysing the worst relative efficiency or pessimistic efficiency. This approach uses the inefficient production frontier for determining the worst relative efficiency that can be assigned to each DMU. DMUs lying on the inefficient production frontier are referred to as DEA inefficient while those neither on the efficient frontier nor on the inefficient frontier are declared DEA inefficient. It can be argued that both relative efficiencies should be considered simultaneously and any approach with only one of them would be biased. This paper proposed the integration of both efficiencies as an interval so that the overall performance score would belong to this interval. It was shown that efficiency interval provided more information than either of the two efficiencies, which was illustrated using two numerical examples.     

A study of optimal weights of Data Envelopment Analysis - Development of a context-dependent DEA-R model

The weight is one of the main issues of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), and relevant theoretical research indicates that many DEA mathematical models include redundant restraints on weight, resulting in underestimated efficiency, pseudo inefficiency, and difficulty in representing specific Input/Output relationships. This study proposes a context-dependent DEA-R model to address shortcomings resulting from redundant restraints on the weights of an efficient decision making unit (DMU), and converts the optimal weight to analyze the influences of redundant restraints on weights. The evaluation results of Taiwan medical centers show that the efficiency of the DMU is underestimated and pseudo inefficiency may occur due to redundant restraints on weight. Moreover, optimal weights are used as variables to conduct cluster analysis in order to determine the information of the weights. The results of cluster analysis indicate that it can assist DMUs in understanding the relationships between DMUs, and contribute to the development of a unique survival strategy for hospitals.     

Negative data in DEA: Recognizing congestion and specifying the least and the most congested decision making units

One of the important concepts of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is congestion. A decision making unit (DMU) has congestion if an increase (decrease) in one or more input(s) of the DMU leads to a decrease (increase) in one or more its output(s). The drawback of all existing congestion DEA approaches is that they are applicable only to technologies specified by non-negative data, whereas in the real world, it may exist negative data, too. Moreover, specifying the strongly and weakly most congested DMUs is a very important issue for decision makers, however, there is no study on specifying these DMUs in DEA. These two facts are motivations for creating this current study. Hence, in this research, we first introduce a DEA model to determine candidate DMUs for having congestion and then, a DEA approach is presented to detect congestion status of these DMUs. Likewise, we propose two integrated mixed integer programming (MIP)-DEA models to specify the strongly and weakly most congested DMUs. Note that the proposed approach permits the inputs and outputs that can take both negative and non-negative magnitudes. Also, a ranking DEA approach is introduced to rank the specified congested DMUs and identify the least congested DMU. Finally, a numerical example and an empirical application are presented to highlight the purpose of this research.     

Measurement of overall performances of decision-making units using ideal and anti-ideal decision-making units

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for evaluating relative efficiencies of decision-making units (DMUs) which perform similar functions in a production system, consuming multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. The conventional form of DEA evaluates performances of DMUs only from the optimistic point of view. In other words, it chooses the most favorable weights for each DMU. There is another approach that measures efficiency of a DMU from the pessimistic point of view. This approach chooses the most unfavorable weights for evaluation of each DMU. In this paper, we propose to integrate both efficiencies in the form of an interval in order to measure the overall performance of a DMU. The proposed DEA models for evaluation of efficiencies are called bounded DEA models. The proposed approach will be compared using a numerical example. Another example regarding performance evaluation of 50 bank branches in Iranian cities will be presented to demonstrate the advantages, simplicity, and utility of this approach in real-life situations.     

Ranking efficient DMUs using cooperative game theory

The problem of ranking Decision Making Units (DMUs) in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been widely studied in the literature. Some of the proposed approaches use cooperative game theory as a tool to perform the ranking. In this paper, we use the Shapley value of two different cooperative games in which the players are the efficient DMUs and the characteristic function represents the increase in the discriminant power of DEA contributed by each efficient DMU. The idea is that if the efficient DMUs are not included in the modified reference sample then the efficiency score of some inefficient DMUs would be higher. The characteristic function represents, therefore, the change in the efficiency scores of the inefficient DMUs that occurs when a given coalition of efficient units is dropped from the sample. Alternatively, the characteristic function of the cooperative game can be defined as the change in the efficiency scores of the inefficient DMUs that occurs when a given coalition of efficient DMUs are the only efficient DMUs that are included in the sample. Since the two cooperative games proposed are dual games, their corresponding Shapley value coincide and thus lead to the same ranking. The more an efficient DMU impacts the shape of the efficient frontier, the higher the increase in the efficiency scores of the inefficient DMUs its removal brings about and, hence, the higher its contribution to the overall discriminant power of the method. The proposed approach is illustrated on a number of datasets from the literature and compared with existing methods.     

New analytical hierarchical process/data envelopment analysis methodology for ranking decision‐making units

The analytical hierarchical process/data envelopment analysis (AHP/DEA) methodology for ranking decision‐making units (DMUs) has some problems: it illogically compares two DMUs in a DEA model; it is not compatible with DEA ranking in the case of multiple inputs/multiple outputs; and it leads to weak discrimination in cases where the number of inputs and outputs is large. In this paper, we propose a new two‐stage AHP/DEA methodology for ranking DMUs that removes these problems. In the first stage, we create a pairwise comparison matrix different from AHP/DEA methodology; the second stage is the same as AHP/DEA methodology. Numerical examples are presented in the paper to illustrate the advantages of the new AHP/DEA methodology.     

Slacks-based measures of efficiency in imprecise data envelopment analysis: An approach based on data envelopment analysis with double frontiers

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a mathematical approach for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) that convert multiple inputs into multiple outputs. Traditional DEA models assume that all input and output data are known exactly. In many situations, however, some inputs and/or outputs take imprecise data. In this paper, we present optimistic and pessimistic perspectives for obtaining an efficiency evaluation for the DMU under consideration with imprecise data. Additionally, slacks-based measures of efficiency are used for direct assessment of efficiency in the presence of imprecise data with slack values. Finally, the geometric average of the two efficiency values is used to determine the DMU with the best performance. A ranking approach based on degree of preference is used for ranking the efficiency intervals of the DMUs. Two numerical examples are used to show the application of the proposed DEA approach.     

A note on simulating weights restrictions in DEA: an improvement of Thanassoulis and Allen's method

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric technique for measuring and assessing the comparative efficiencies of decision making units (DMUs). Weights restrictions are often imposed on these assessments and create many problems in interpretations of results. This paper focuses on one of those and reviews unobserved DMUs method, introduced by Thanassoulis and Allen, to overcome this problem. This paper clarifies the method proposed by them for specifying full set of unobserved DMUs (FSUD) and reduced set of unobserved DMUs (RSUD) as two sets of unobserved DMUs, too. It is indicated that this method is not suitable for some cases and a simple approach is introduced to identify and eliminate redundant unobserved DMUs and specify a new RSUD convenient for all cases.