Estimation of hand force in ergonomic job evaluations

The aims of the present study were: (1) to collect normative data of pinch and power grip strength with a newer digital dynamometer; (2) to study the ability of hand grip force matching using a hand dynamometer where the validity and reliability issues were studied; and (3) to study the relationship between hand grip force matching and muscle activities of three forearm and hand muscles. This study consisted of two experiments. One hundred and twenty subjects volunteered in the first experiment, where hand grip strength and hand force estimation data were collected. The second experiment had 14 volunteers, where muscle activities of the hand and forearm were collected during the tests of hand grip strength and hand force matching estimations. Results showed that the power grip and pinch grip strengths collected with a newer digital dynamometer were comparable to similar studies using older equipment. At the group level, the force matching method was largely accurate and consistent. Instructions to the subjects about force matching estimation were important to the accuracy and consistency of the estimated forces. Estimation in force matching might depend on perceptions of several major muscle activities.     

A systematic exploration of distal arm muscle activity and perceived exertion while applying external forces and moments

The purpose of this study was to systematically explore and describe the response of selected hand and forearm muscles during a wide range of static force and moment exertions. Twenty individuals with manual work experience performed exertions in power grip, pulp pinch and lateral pinch grips. Electromyography (EMG) from eight sites of the hand and forearm, grip force as well as ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were monitored as each participant exerted approximately 350 short (5 s) static grip forces and external forces and moments. As expected, strong relationships were found between grip force alone without other actions and muscle activation. When the hand was used to grip and transmit forces and moments to the environment, the relationships between grip force and muscle activation were much weaker. Using grip force as a surrogate for forearm and hand tissue loading may therefore be misleading.     

A systematic exploration of distal arm muscle activity and perceived exertion while applying external forces and moments

The purpose of this study was to systematically explore and describe the response of selected hand and forearm muscles during a wide range of static force and moment exertions. Twenty individuals with manual work experience performed exertions in power grip, pulp pinch and lateral pinch grips. Electromyography (EMG) from eight sites of the hand and forearm, grip force as well as ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were monitored as each participant exerted approximately 350 short (5 s) static grip forces and external forces and moments. As expected, strong relationships were found between grip force alone without other actions and muscle activation. When the hand was used to grip and transmit forces and moments to the environment, the relationships between grip force and muscle activation were much weaker. Using grip force as a surrogate for forearm and hand tissue loading may therefore be misleading.     

Characterizing human hand prehensile strength by force and moment wrench

Characterizing human hand capabilities or demand created by various occupational tasks or activities of daily living has been mainly accomplished by measuring the maximum force exerted on a force dynamometer in a number of standard grips, for example power, key pinch and tip pinch grips. A framework is proposed instead to characterize human hand prehensile strength in generic form by describing external force and moment wrench capability, where a wrench is a vector describing the forces and moments applied at a point. It is further suggested that if tools and activities are characterized by the internal forces and external forces and moments required, a better understanding of the human prehension in occupational settings and during activities of daily living can be obtained. An example of using a pistol grip drill is used to show the utility of the approach.     

Characterizing human hand prehensile strength by force and moment wrench

Characterizing human hand capabilities or demand created by various occupational tasks or activities of daily living has been mainly accomplished by measuring the maximum force exerted on a force dynamometer in a number of standard grips, for example power, key pinch and tip pinch grips. A framework is proposed instead to characterize human hand prehensile strength in generic form by describing external force and moment wrench capability, where a wrench is a vector describing the forces and moments applied at a point. It is further suggested that if tools and activities are characterized by the internal forces and external forces and moments required, a better understanding of the human prehension in occupational settings and during activities of daily living can be obtained. An example of using a pistol grip drill is used to show the utility of the approach.     

Forearm posture and grip effects during push and pull tasks

Direction of loading and performance of multiple tasks have been shown to elevate muscle activity in the upper extremity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of gripping on muscle activity and applied force during pushing and pulling tasks with three forearm postures. Twelve volunteers performed five hand-based tasks in supinated, neutral and pronated forearm postures with the elbow at 90° and upper arm vertical. All tasks were performed with the right (dominant) hand and included hand grip alone, push and pull with and without hand grip. Surface EMG from eight upper extremity muscles, hand grip force, tri-axial push and pull forces and wrist angles were recorded during the 10 s trials. The addition of a pull force to hand grip elevated activity in all forearm muscles (all p < 0.017). During all push with grip tasks, forearm extensor muscle activity tended to increase when compared with grip only while flexor activity tended to decrease. Forearm extensor muscle activity was higher with the forearm pronated compared with neutral and supinated postures during most isolated grip tasks and push or pull with grip tasks (all p < 0.017). When the grip dynamometer was rotated so that the push and pull forces could act to assist in creating grip force, forearm muscle activity generally decreased. These results provide strategies for reducing forearm muscle loading in the workplace.

Statement of Relevance: Tools and tasks designed to take advantage of coupling grip with push or pull actions may be beneficial in reducing stress and injury in the muscles of the forearm. These factors should be considered in assessing the workplace in terms of acute and cumulative loading.     

Effect of grip span on lateral pinch grip strength

Repetitive, high-force pinch grip exertions are common in many occupational activities. The goal of the current study was to quantify the relationship between lateral pinch grip span (distance between thumb and index finger) and lateral pinch grip strength. An experiment was conducted in which 40 participants performed maximal lateral pinch grip exertions at 11 levels of grip span distances (0, 10%, ... 100% of maximum functional lateral pinch grip span distance). The results show a significant effect of lateral pinch grip span, with strength at the maximum functional lateral pinch grip span 40% higher than that found at the smallest lateral pinch grip span considered. Between these two endpoints, strength increased monotonically with increasing pinch grip span. The application of these results in pinch grip design criteria for both high-force and long-duration exertions is discussed. Potential applications of this research include the design of hand tools and controls for which significant force is applied by the user.     

Measurement of prehensile grasp capabilities by a force and moment wrench: methodological development and assessment of manual workers

Prehensile grasp capability is typically quantified by pinch and grasp forces. This work was undertaken to develop a methodology to assess complex, multi-axis hand exertions through the measurement of forces and moments exerted by the hand along and about three orthogonal axes originating at the grip centre; termed an external wrench. Instrumentation consisting of a modified pinch/grip dynamometer affixed to a 6 df force cube was developed to simultaneously measure three forces, three moments and the pinch/grip force about the centre of the grip. Twenty right hand dominant manual workers (10 male and 10 female), free of hand or wrist disorders, completed a variety of maximal strength tasks. The randomized block design involved three separate grips--power grip, lateral pinch and pulp pinch. Randomized within each block were three non-concurrent repetitions of isolated maximal force and moment generations along and about the three principle orthogonal axes and a maximal grip force exertion. Trials were completed while standing, with the arm abducted and elbow flexed to 90 degrees with a wrist posture near neutral. Where comparable protocols existed in the literature, forces and moments exerted were found to be of similar magnitude to those reported previously. Female and male grip strengths on a Jamar dynamometer were 302.6 N and 450.5 N, respectively. Moment exertions in a power grip (female and male) were 4.7 Nm and 8.1 Nm for pronator, 4.9 Nm and 8.0 Nm for supinator, 6.2 Nm and 10.3 Nm for radial deviator, 7.7 Nm and 13.0 Nm for ulnar deviator, 6.2 Nm and 8.2 Nm for extensor, and 7.1 Nm and 9.3 Nm for flexor moments. Correlations with and between maximal force and moment exertions were only moderate. This paper describes instrumentation that allows comprehensive characterization of prehensile force and moment capability.     

Measurement of prehensile grasp capabilities by a force and moment wrench: Methodological development and assessment of manual workers

Prehensile grasp capability is typically quantified by pinch and grasp forces. This work was undertaken to develop a methodology to assess complex, multi-axis hand exertions through the measurement of forces and moments exerted by the hand along and about three orthogonal axes originating at the grip centre; termed an external wrench. Instrumentation consisting of a modified pinch/grip dynamometer affixed to a 6?df force cube was developed to simultaneously measure three forces, three moments and the pinch/grip force about the centre of the grip. Twenty right hand dominant manual workers (10 male and 10 female), free of hand or wrist disorders, completed a variety of maximal strength tasks. The randomized block design involved three separate grips?–?power grip, lateral pinch and pulp pinch. Randomized within each block were three non-concurrent repetitions of isolated maximal force and moment generations along and about the three principle orthogonal axes and a maximal grip force exertion. Trials were completed while standing, with the arm abducted and elbow flexed to 90° with a wrist posture near neutral. Where comparable protocols existed in the literature, forces and moments exerted were found to be of similar magnitude to those reported previously. Female and male grip strengths on a Jamar dynamometer were 302.6?N and 450.5?N, respectively. Moment exertions in a power grip (female and male) were 4.7 Nm and 8.1 Nm for pronator, 4.9 Nm and 8.0 Nm for supinator, 6.2 Nm and 10.3 Nm for radial deviator, 7.7 Nm and 13.0 Nm for ulnar deviator, 6.2 Nm and 8.2 Nm for extensor, and 7.1 Nm and 9.3 Nm for flexor moments. Correlations with and between maximal force and moment exertions were only moderate. This paper describes instrumentation that allows comprehensive characterization of prehensile force and moment capability.     

The development and validation of equations to predict grip force in the workplace: contributions of muscle activity and posture

The inherent difficulty of measuring forces on the hand in ergonomic workplace assessments has led to the need for equations to predict grip force. A family of equations was developed, and validated, for the prediction of grip force using forearm electromyography (six finger and wrist muscles) as well as posture of the wrist (flexed, neutral and extended) and forearm (pronated, neutral, supinated). Inclusion of muscle activity was necessary to explain over 85% of the grip force variance and was further improved with wrist posture but not forearm posture. Posture itself had little predictive power without muscle activity (<1%). Nominal wrist posture improved predictive power more than the measured wrist angle. Inclusion of baseline muscle activity, the activity required to simply hold the grip dynamometer, greatly improved grip force predictions, especially at low force levels. While the complete model using six muscles and posture was the most accurate, the detailed validation and error analysis revealed that equations based on fewer components often resulted in a negligible reduction in predictive strength. Error was typically less than 10% under 50% of maximal grip force and around 15% over 50% of maximal grip force. This study presents detailed error analyses to both improve upon previous studies and to allow an educated decision to be made on which muscles to monitor depending on expected force levels, costs and error deemed acceptable by the potential user.     

A linear force-summing hand dynamometer independent of point of application

Theory, design and construction details are presented for a versatile strain gauge hand dynamometer. What distinguishes this instrument is that sensitivity is completely independent of the location. Force is applied so it is capable of linearly summing forces exerted at multiple locations along the length of the active area of the dynamometer. In addition to including the basic principles of this transducer, a template for the instrument and an accompanying spread sheet is provided for computing transducer response characteristics for instruments of arbitrary size, including sensitivity and force range, depending on particular measurement requirements. Variations of this dynamometer were constructed and used for measuring grip and pinch strength, as well as for measuring submaximal exertions produced during manual activities and tasks. Because this dynamometer is compact and rigid, one of suitable dimensions may be substituted as a handle for tools or objects handled during work for directly measuring applied exertions and grip force. Examples of practical applications of this instrument are given for hand biomechanics, hand tool ergonomics, and clinical evaluations.     

The development and validation of equations to predict grip force in the workplace: contributions of muscle activity and posture

The inherent difficulty of measuring forces on the hand in ergonomic workplace assessments has led to the need for equations to predict grip force. A family of equations was developed, and validated, for the prediction of grip force using forearm electromyography (six finger and wrist muscles) as well as posture of the wrist (flexed, neutral and extended) and forearm (pronated, neutral, supinated). Inclusion of muscle activity was necessary to explain over 85% of the grip force variance and was further improved with wrist posture but not forearm posture. Posture itself had little predictive power without muscle activity (<1%). Nominal wrist posture improved predictive power more than the measured wrist angle. Inclusion of baseline muscle activity, the activity required to simply hold the grip dynamometer, greatly improved grip force predictions, especially at low force levels. While the complete model using six muscles and posture was the most accurate, the detailed validation and error analysis revealed that equations based on fewer components often resulted in a negligible reduction in predictive strength. Error was typically less than 10% under 50% of maximal grip force and around 15% over 50% of maximal grip force. This study presents detailed error analyses to both improve upon previous studies and to allow an educated decision to be made on which muscles to monitor depending on expected force levels, costs and error deemed acceptable by the potential user.     

Power grip force is modulated in repeated elbow movement

The objective of this study was to quantitatively investigate the modulation of power grip force under repeated elbow movement and its relation to muscle cocontraction and potential risk of developing cumulative trauma disorders (CTD). Thirteen right-handed participants without any neuromuscular disorders were recruited. Participants were instructed to hold a digital dynamometer in the hand with three levels of grip forces (20%, 40% and 60% of the maximum grip force) and perform repeated arm movement in the sagittal plane at three speeds (slow, self-paced and fast) with the upper arm voluntarily held by side by the participant. With the increase of motion rate and target force level, the grip force fluctuation, finger flexor muscle activities, elbow muscles cocontraction and apparent stiffness were significantly increased (p < 0.01). This study suggests that the power grip coupled with fast arm movement be avoided as much as possible in the workplace. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Power grip is usually accompanied with arm movement in workplaces and the increased physical demand might result in higher muscle activities and potentially higher risk of repetitive musculoskeletal injuries.     

Calibrating Borg scale ratings of hand force exertion

A study was conducted to assess the efficacy of calibrating subjective worker ratings of hand exertions to reduce error in estimates of applied force. Twenty volunteer subjects applied pinch and power grip forces corresponding to their perceptions of different Borg CR-10 scale levels using both "grip-to-scale" and "guided-grip" procedures. These data were used separately to define relationships between scale ratings and actual force application. Two gripping tasks were performed and corresponding subjective hand force ratings were calibrated using the grip-to-scale calibration data. Results showed that the mean estimation error for a 44.5 N (10 lb) power grip task was significantly reduced from 142.8 (+/-69.0) to 62.3 (+/-58.3) N. The guided-grip calibration method also significantly reduced rating error for the power grip task, however the estimates were biased toward zero. Neither calibration procedure improved rating accuracy of an 8.9 N (2 lb) pinch grip task. The study results indicate that calibration of hand force ratings using the grip-to-scale procedure may improve the accuracy of hand exertion measurements using the Borg CR-10 scale.     

The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping

The purpose of this study was to quantify the response of the forearm musculature to combinations of wrist and forearm posture and grip force. Ten healthy individuals performed five relative handgrip efforts (5%, 50%, 70% and 100% of maximum, and 50 N) for combinations of three wrist postures (flexed, neutral and extended) and three forearm postures (pronated, neutral and supinated). ‘Baseline’ extensor muscle activity (associated with holding the dynamometer without exerting grip force) was greatest with the forearm pronated and the wrist extended, while flexor activity was largest in supination when the wrist was flexed. Extensor activity was generally larger than that of flexors during low to mid-range target force levels, and was always greater when the forearm was pronated. Flexor activation only exceeded the extensor activation at the 70% and 100% target force levels in some postures. A flexed wrist reduced maximum grip force by 40-50%, but EMG amplitude remained elevated. Women produced 60-65% of the grip strength of men, and required 5-10% more of both relative force and extensor activation to produce a 50 N grip. However, this appeared to be due to strength rather than gender. Forearm rotation affected grip force generation only when the wrist was flexed, with force decreasing from supination to pronation (p<0.005). The levels of extensor activation observed, especially during baseline and low level grip exertions, suggest a possible contributing mechanism to the development of lateral forearm muscle pain in the workplace.     

The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping

The purpose of this study was to quantify the response of the forearm musculature to combinations of wrist and forearm posture and grip force. Ten healthy individuals performed five relative handgrip efforts (5%, 50%, 70% and 100% of maximum, and 50 N) for combinations of three wrist postures (flexed, neutral and extended) and three forearm postures (pronated, neutral and supinated). 'Baseline' extensor muscle activity (associated with holding the dynamometer without exerting grip force) was greatest with the forearm pronated and the wrist extended, while flexor activity was largest in supination when the wrist was flexed. Extensor activity was generally larger than that of flexors during low to mid-range target force levels, and was always greater when the forearm was pronated. Flexor activation only exceeded the extensor activation at the 70% and 100% target force levels in some postures. A flexed wrist reduced maximum grip force by 40-50%, but EMG amplitude remained elevated. Women produced 60-65% of the grip strength of men, and required 5-10% more of both relative force and extensor activation to produce a 50 N grip. However, this appeared to be due to strength rather than gender. Forearm rotation affected grip force generation only when the wrist was flexed, with force decreasing from supination to pronation (p < 0.005). The levels of extensor activation observed, especially during baseline and low level grip exertions, suggest a possible contributing mechanism to the development of lateral forearm muscle pain in the workplace.     

Effect of grip span on maximal grip force and fatigue of flexor digitorum superficialis.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of grip span on isometric grip force and fatigue of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle during sustained voluntary contractions at 60-65% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Eighteen subjects performed isometric, submaximal gripping contractions using a grip dynamometer at four different grip span settings while the pronated forearm rested on a horizontal surface. Maximal absolute grip force and median power frequency of FDS surface electromyography (EMG) during the submaximal trials were analyzed. Fatigue of FDS, as inferred from EMG frequency shifts, did not change as a function of grip size. However, middle grip sizes allowed for greater absolute forces than the small or large size. When contractions are at 60-65% MVC and the muscle is allowed to fatigue, however, grip size may be less influential than when maximal absolute force is required.     

An investigation of finger pull strengths.

This paper describes a study to investigate the nature of pull strength with the fingers. Three types of pulls, distinguished by the type of pinch grip used, were investigated. The experiment was performed in two stages, using different subjects (36 male adults in Stage I and 34 in Stage II). The results indicated that finger pull strength depended on the type of pinch grip used but not on the direction of pull (in the saggital plane) nor on hand laterality. Pull forces with the lateral pinch grip were 1.6 times as strong as with the chuck pinch grip, which was, in turn, 1.5 times as strong as with the pulp pinch grip. Ergonomic design applications suggest a larger pinch handle and workspace to accommodate the lateral grip. Finger pull strength could not be predicted very accurately from pure pinch strengths or anthropometric dimensions accurately enough to be of value to designers, even though there were many statistically significant pairwise correlations.     

Effect of carpal tunnel syndrome on grip force coordination on hand tools

This study investigated coordination of the grip force on and force applied with a hand tool using a precision pinch grip. A simulated hand tool was developed to measure grip force exerted on the tool as a function of the force transmitted from the tool to an external object in a dynamic force matching paradigm. Grip force coordination measures reflected subjects' abilities to modulate grip force in parallel with the tool application force and their abilities to minimize excessive grip force. These measures were calculated for seven subjects with a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and seven age- and gender-matched controls. The absolute magnitude of excessive grip force (safety margin) was unreliable because of the high intrasubject variability in coefficient of friction measurements. Linear regression equations predicting coefficient of friction from pinch force magnitude had low r2 coefficients of determination and were generally not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Relative comparisons of grip force control showed that individuals with CTS exhibited a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in ratio of grip force to application force (54% higher than controls) and a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in modulation of pinch force with application force (12% lower than controls). These results suggest that individuals with CTS lose some ability to coordinate efficiently grip force on hand tools and exert higher grip forces on tools, at equivalent application forces, than controls. This is believed to be a result of tactile sensibility deficits associated with CTS. As a result, workers with CTS may be at increased risk of accelerating the progression of their musculoskeletal disorder.     

A review of: “Health Hazards of the Human Environment.” (Geneva: World Health Organization, 1972.) | Pp. 387.] £4 40

This study investigated coordination of the grip force on and force applied with a hand tool using a precision pinch grip. A simulated hand tool was developed to measure grip force exerted on the tool as a function of the force transmitted from the tool to an external object in a dynamic force matching paradigm. Grip force coordination measures reflected subjects' abilities to modulate grip force in parallel with the tool application force and their abilities to minimize excessive grip force. These measures were calculated for seven subjects with a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and seven age- and gender-matched controls. The absolute magnitude of excessive grip force (safety margin) was unreliable because of the high intrasubject variability in coefficient of friction measurements. Linear regression equations predicting coefficient of friction from pinch force magnitude had low r ² coefficients of determination and were generally not statistically significant (p &;gt; 0.05). Relative comparisons of grip force control showed that individuals with CTS exhibited a statistically significant (p &;lt; 0.05) increase in ratio of grip force to application force (54% higher than controls) and a significant (p &;lt; 0.05) decrease in modulation of pinch force with application force (12% lower than controls). These results suggest that individuals with CTS lose some ability to coordinate efficiently grip force on hand tools and exert higher grip forces on tools, at equivalent application forces, than controls. This is believed to be a result of tactile sensibility deficits associated with CTS. As a result, workers with CTS may be at increased risk of accelerating the progression of their musculoskeletal disorder.