On the equivalence of semantics for normal logic programs

Despite the frequent comment that there is no general agreement on the semantics of logic programs, this paper shows that a number of independently proposed extensions to the stable model semantics coincide: the regular model semantics proposed by You and Yuan, the partial stable model semantics by Saccà and Zaniolo, the preferential semantics by Dung, and a stronger version of the stable class semantics by Baral and Subrahmanian. We show that these equivalent semantics can be characterized simply as selecting a particular kind of stable classes, called normal alternating fixpoints. In addition, we indicate that almost all of the previously proposed semantic frameworks coincide with that of normal alternating fixpoints. Due to its simplicity and naturalness, the framework of normal alternating fixpoints offers great potential in the study of the semantics for various nonmonotonic systems.     

A new fixpoint semantics for general logic programs compared with the well-founded and the stable model semantics

We study a new fixpoint semantics for logic programs with negation. Our construction is intermediate between Van Gelder’s well-founded model and Gelfond and Lifschitz’s stable model semantics. We show first that the stable models of a logic programP are exactly the well-supported models ofP, i.e. the supported models with loop-free finite justifications. Then we associate to any logic programP a non-monotonic operator over the semilattice of justified interpretations, and we define in an abstract form its ordinal powers. We show that the fixpoints of this operator are the stable models ofP, and that its ordinal powers after some ordinala are extensions of the well-founded partial model ofP. In particular ifP has a well-founded model then that canonical model is also an ordinal power and the unique fixpoint of our operator. We show with examples of logic programs which have a unique stable model but no well-founded model that the converse is false. We relate also our work to Doyle’s truth maintenance system and some implementations of rule-based expert systems.     

Well-founded and stationary models of logic programs

We investigate the class ofstationary or partial stable models of normal logic programs. This important class of models includes all (total)stable models, and, moreover, thewell-founded model is always its smallest member. Stationary models have several natural fixed-point definitions and can be equivalently obtained as expansions or extensions of suitable autoepistemic or default theories. By taking a particular subclass of this class of models one can obtain different semantics of logic programs, including the stable semantics and the well-founded semantics. Stationary models can be also naturally extended to the class of all disjunctive logic programs. These features of stationary models designate them as an important class of models with applications reaching far beyond the realm of logic programming.Partially supported by the National Science Foundation grant #IRI-9313061.     

Stable semantics for disjunctive programs

We introduce the stable model semantics fordisjunctive logic programs and deductive databases, which generalizes the stable model semantics, defined earlier for normal (i.e., non-disjunctive) programs. Depending on whether only total (2-valued) or all partial (3-valued) models are used we obtain thedisjunctive stable semantics or thepartial disjunctive stable semantics, respectively. The proposed semantics are shown to have the following properties:

? For normal programs, the disjunctive (respectively, partial disjunctive) stable semantics coincides with thestable (respectively,partial stable) semantics.

? For normal programs, the partial disjunctive stable semantics also coincides with thewell-founded semantics.

? For locally stratified disjunctive programs both (total and partial) disjunctive stable semantics coincide with theperfect model semantics.

? The partial disjunctive stable semantics can be generalized to the class ofall disjunctive logic programs.

? Both (total and partial) disjunctive stable semantics can be naturally extended to a broader class of disjunctive programs that permit the use ofclassical negation.

? After translation of the programP into a suitable autoepistemic theory \( \hat P \) the disjunctive (respectively, partial disjunctive) stable semantics ofP coincides with the autoepistemic (respectively, 3-valued autoepistemic) semantics of \( \hat P \) .

     

扩充析取逻辑程序的争论语义

该文探讨争论推理在扩充逻辑程序中的实现及其关系问题.基于“相干原理”,建立了扩充逻辑程序的争论推理框架,多种争论推理形式都可以嵌入其中.特别是提出了一种谨慎语义Acc.同时又定义了良基语义的一种合理扩充Mod,以处理较为大胆的推理形式.另外也研究了相关的理论性质.     

Static semantics for normal and disjunctive logic programs

In this paper, we propose a newsemantic framework for disjunctive logic programming by introducingstatic expansions of disjunctive programs. The class of static expansions extends both the classes of stable, well-founded and stationary models of normal programs and the class of minimal models of positive disjunctive programs. Any static expansion of a programP provides the corresponding semantics forP consisting of the set of all sentences logically implied by the expansion. We show that among all static expansions of a disjunctive programP there is always theleast static expansion, which we call thestatic completion ¯P ofP. The static completion¯P can be defined as the least fixed point of a naturalminimal model operator and can be constructed by means of a simpleiterative procedure. The semantics defined by the static completion¯P is called thestatic semantics ofP. It coincides with the set of sentences that are true inall static expansions ofP. For normal programs, it coincides with the well-founded semantics. The class of static expansions represents a semantic framework which differs significantly from the other semantics proposed recently for disjunctive programs and databases. It is also defined for a much broader class of programs.Dedicated to Jack MinkerPartially supported by the National Science Foundation grant # IRI-9313061.     

SLT-Resolution for the Well-Founded Semantics

Global SLS-resolution and SLG-resolution are two representative mechanisms for top-down evaluation of the well-founded semantics of general logic programs. Global SLS-resolution is linear for query evaluation but suffers from infinite loops and redundant computations. In contrast, SLG-resolution resolves infinite loops and redundant computations by means of tabling, but it is not linear. The principal disadvantage of a nonlinear approach is that it cannot be implemented by using a simple, efficient stack-based memory structure nor can it be easily extended to handle some strictly sequential operators such as cuts in Prolog. In this paper, we present a linear tabling method, called SLT-resolution, for top-down evaluation of the well-founded semantics. SLT-resolution is a substantial extension of SLDNF-resolution with tabling. Its main features are the following. First, it resolves infinite loops and redundant computations while preserving the linearity. Second, it is terminating and is sound and complete w.r.t. the well-founded semantics for programs with the bounded-term-size property with nonfloundering queries. Its time complexity is comparable with SLG-resolution and polynomial for function-free logic programs. Third, because of its linearity for query evaluation, SLT-resolution bridges the gap between the well-founded semantics and standard Prolog implementation techniques. It can be implemented by an extension to any existing Prolog abstract machines such as WAM or ATOAM.     

Computation of stable models and its integration with logical queryprocessing

The well-founded semantics and the stable model semantics capture intuitions of the skeptical and credulous semantics in nonmonotonic reasoning, respectively. They represent the two dominant proposals for the declarative semantics of deductive databases and logic programs. However, neither semantics seems to be suitable for all applications. We have developed an efficient implementation of goal-oriented effective query evaluation under the well-founded semantics. It produces a residual program for subgoals that are relevant to a query, which contains facts for true instances and clauses with body literals for undefined instances. We present a simple method of stable model computation that can be applied to the residual program of a query to derive answers with respect to stable models. The method incorporates both forward and backward chaining to propagate the assumed truth values of ground atoms, and derives multiple stable models through backtracking. Users are able to request that only stable models satisfying certain conditions be computed. A prototype has been developed that provides integrated query evaluation under the well-founded semantics, the stable models, and ordinary Prolog execution. We describe the user interface of the prototype and present some experimental results     

Complexity and undecidability results for logic programming

This paper surveys complexity, degree of uncomputability, and expressive power results for logic programming. Some major decision problem complexity results and other results for logic programming are also covered. It also proves several new results filling in previous gaps in the literature. The paper considers seven logic programming semantics: the van Emden-Kowalski semantics for definite (Horn) logic programs; the perfect model semantics for stratified and for locally stratified logic programs; and the two- and three-valued program completion semantics, the well-founded semantics, and the stable semantics, all for normal logic programs, under skeptical inference. The main results concern expressibility and query complexity/uncomputability in five contexts: for propositional logic programs, for first order logic programs with infinite Herbrand universes on their Herbrand universes (a closed domain assumption), for first order logic programs with infinite Herbrand universes on those universes extended with infinitely many new elements (an open domain assumption), and for logic programs without function or constant symbols evaluated over varying extensional databases (DATALOG-type results, data complexity results only) under both closed and open domain assumptions. Several of the open domain assumption results are new to this paper. Other results surveyed are (1) results about the family of all stable models of a program and (2) decision questions about when a logic program has nice properties with respect to a semantics (e.g., a unique stable model). One decision result, for well-founded semantics, is new to this paper.Work supported in part by NSF grant IRI-8905166.     

Non-determinism and weak constraints in Datalog

This paper introduces a simple and powerful extension of stratified DATALOG which permits to express various DB-complexity classes. The new language, called DATALOG^¬s,c,p , extends DATALOG with stratified negation, a non-deterministic construct, calledchoice, and a weak form of constraints, calledpreference rules, that is, constraints that should be respected but, if they cannot be eventually enforced, they only invalidate the portions of the program which they are concerned with. Although DATALOG with stratified negation is not able to express all polynomial time queries,²⁰⁾ the introduction of the non-deterministic constructchoice permits to express, exactly, the ‘deterministic fragment’ of the class of DB-queriesP, under the non-deterministic semantics,NP, under the possible semantics, and coNP, under the certain semantics. The introduction of preference rules, further increases the expressive power of the language, and permits to express the complexity classes Σ ₂ ^p , under the possibility semantics, and Π ₂ ^p , under the certainty semantics.     

Nondeterministic flowchart programs with recursive procedures: semantics and correctness I

In this paper, we study some aspects of the semantics of nondeterministic flowchart programs with recursive procedures. In the first part of this work we provide the operational semantics of programs using the concept of an execution tree. We propose a new definition of the semantics of a non-deterministic recursive program as a mapping from the input domain to the set of execution trees determined by the program. Using this new concept, we prove that every nondeterministic flowchart program with recursive procedures can be unfolded into a semantically equivalent infinite pure flowchart (without procedures). This result is applied in the second part of this work to prove the soundness of an inductive assertion method which is also complete with a finite number of assertions (contrary to De Bakker and Meertens's method [11]).     

A semantics for a class of non-deterministic and causal production system programs

We define a class of function-free rule-based production system (PS) programs that exhibit non-deterministic and/or causal behavior. We develop a fixpoint semantics and an equivalent declarative semantics for these programs. The criterion to recognize the class of non-deterministic causal (NDC) PS programs is based upon extending and relaxing the concept of stratification, to partition the rules of the program. Unlike strict stratification, this relaxed stratification criterion allows a more flexible partitioning of the rules and admits programs whose execution is non-deterministic or causal or both. The fixpoint semantics is based upon a monotonic fixpoint operator which guarantees that the execution of the program will terminate. Each fixpoint corresponds to a minimal database of answers for the NDC PS program. Since the execution of the program is non-deterministic, several fixpoints may be obtained. To obtain a declarative meaning for the PS program, we associate a normal logic program with each NDC PS program. We use the generalized disjunctive well-founded semantics to provide a meaning to the normal logic program Through these semantics, a well-founded state is associated with and a set of possible extensions, each of which are minimal models for the well-founded state, are obtained. We show that the fixpoint semantics for the NDC PS programs is sound and complete with respect to the declarative semantics for the corresponding normal logic program .This research is partially sponsored by the National Science Foundation under grant IRI-9008208 and by the Institute for Advanced Computer Studies.     

Autoepistemic logics as a unifying framework for the semantics of logic programs

In this paper, it is shown that a three-valued autoepistemic logic provides an elegant unifying framework for some of the major semantics of normal and disjunctive logic programs and logic programs with classical negation, namely, the stable semantics, the well-founded semantics, supported models, Fitting's semantics, Kunen's semantics, the stationary semantics, and answer sets. For the first time, so many semantics are embedded into one logic. The framework extends previous results—by Gelfond, Lifschitz, Marek, Subrahmanian, and Truszczynski —on the relationships between logic programming and Moore's autoepistemic logic. The framework suggests several new semantics for negation-as-failure. In particular, we will introduce the epistemic semantics for disjunctive logic programs. In order to motivate the epistemic semantics, an interesting class of applications called ignorance tests will be formalized; it will be proved that ignorance tests can be defined by means of the epistemic semantics, but not by means of the old semantics for disjunctive programs. The autoepistemic framework provides a formal foundation for an environment that integrates different forms of negation. The role of classical negation and various forms of negation-by-failure in logic programming will be briefly discussed.     

Iterative belief revision in extended logic programming

Extended logic programming augments conventional logic programming with both default and explicit negation. Several semantics for extended logic programs have been proposed that extend the well-founded semantics for logic programs with default negation (called normal programs). We show that two of these extended semantics are intractable; both Dung's grounded argumentation semantics and the well-founded semantics of Alferes et al. are NP-hard. Nevertheless, we also show that these two semantics have a common core, a more restricted form of the grounded semantics, which is tractable and can be computed iteratively in quadratic time. Moreover, this semantics is a representative of a rich class of tractable semantics based on a notion of iterative belief revision.     

On the autoepistemic reconstruction of logic programming

Current semantics of logic programs normally ignore thesyntactical aspects of the programs. As a result, only the meanings ofsome well-behaved programs can be captured by these semantics. In this paper however, we propose a new semantics of logic programs that can reflectsome of the syntactical behaviours of the programs. The central notion of the semantics is the concept of aneutral clause p ← A which does not affect the behaviour of p in a program. The logic that underlies the semantics is based on anintensional extension of Levesque’s autoepistemicpredicate logic. It differs from existing autoepistemic logics in that it isquantificational andconstructive. We will also compare and contrast our semantics with some well-known semantics. In particular, we will show how to capture the undefined value of a logic program without resorting to a three-valued nonmonotonic formalism. This is achieved by translating an incoherent AE logic program to a program with multiple AE extensions whose intersection can then be used to characterize the undefined value of a logic program.     

Uniform semantic treatment of default and autoepistemic logics

We revisit the issue of epistemological and semantic foundations for autoepistemic and default logics, two leading formalisms in nonmonotonic reasoning. We develop a general semantic approach to autoepistemic and default logics that is based on the notion of a belief pair and that exploits the lattice structure of the collection of all belief pairs. For each logic, we introduce a monotone operator on the lattice of belief pairs. We then show that a whole family of semantics can be defined in a systematic and principled way in terms of fixpoints of this operator (or as fixpoints of certain closely related operators). Our approach elucidates fundamental constructive principles in which agents form their belief sets, and leads to approximation semantics for autoepistemic and default logics. It also allows us to establish a precise one-to-one correspondence between the family of semantics for default logic and the family of semantics for autoepistemic logic. The correspondence exploits the modal interpretation of a default proposed by Konolige. Our results establish conclusively that default logic can be viewed as a fragment of autoepistemic logic, a result that has been long anticipated. At the same time, they explain the source of the difficulty to formally relate the semantics of default extensions by Reiter and autoepistemic expansions by Moore. These two semantics occupy different locations in the corresponding families of semantics for default and autoepistemic logics.     

A representation independent language for planar spatial databases with Euclidean distance

Linear constraint databases and query languages are appropriate for spatial database applications. Not only is the data model suitable for representing a large portion of spatial data such as in GIS systems, but there also exist efficient algorithms for the core operations in the query languages. An important limitation of linear constraints, however, is that they cannot model constructs such as Euclidean distance; extending such languages to include such constructs, without obtaining the full power of polynomial constraints has proven to be quite difficult.One approach to this problem, by Kuijpers, Kuper, Paredaens, and Vandeurzen, used the notion of Euclidean constructions with ruler and compass as the basis for a first order query language. While their language had the desired expressive power, the semantics are not really natural, due to its use of an ad hoc encoding. In this paper, we define a language over a similar class of databases, with more natural semantics. We show that this language captures a natural subclass, the representation independent queries of the first order language of Kuijpers, Kuper, Paredaens, and Vandeurzen.