Adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil: impact on disease-free survival and overall survival

PURPOSE: The rationale for using adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer is to achieve better disease control and thus reduce the high rates of tumor recurrence and mortality in patients who undergo curative surgery. The current literature, including relevant abstracts, on clinical trials of fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with high-dose leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer is reviewed. The intent is not to present new data, but to present the reader with a broad perspective and larger patient experience on which to base well-reasoned treatment decisions. DESIGN: Published clinical trials and abstracts presented at the 1996 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting that assessed 5-FU in combination with high-dose leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer were surveyed. End points of interest were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, and toxicity. RESULTS: In randomized trials that used high-dose leucovorin at doses that ranged from daily-times-five 200 mg/m2 to weekly 500 mg/m2 in combination with 5-FU, significant improvements in both DFS and overall survival were observed over surgery alone (control). In patients treated with high-dose leucovorin/5-FU, DFS rates ranged from 71% to 77% compared with control (58% to 64%). A similar trend was seen in overall survival, with a range of 75% to 84% compared with control (63% to 77%). Toxicities observed for high-dose leucovorin administered on a weekly or daily-times-five schedule were diarrhea, stomatitis, myelosuppression, and nausea. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results of these randomized trials support the use of high-dose leucovorin/5-FU as adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. Longer follow-up studies are needed to compare the benefits of these different regimens in terms of survival and to characterize adverse effects, especially those that may not be immediately evident. Adjuvant therapy with high-dose leucovorin/5-FU is an effective regimen that is well tolerated by many patients with colorectal cancer.     

Chemotherapy of colorectal cancers with metastases

The chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer has demonstrated a symptomatic benefit and a prolongation in survival. The modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin is the current standard treatment. The best protocols include 5-FU 24 or 48 hour continuous infusion on a weekly or bimonthly schedule. The response rate is about 30%, the median progression-free survival is 6 to 8 months and the median survival 10 to 15 months. The toxicity is moderate. New drugs are available or under evaluation: 5-FU prodrugs, raltitrexed, CPT11, oxaliplatin, trimetrexate. Synergisms with 5-FU allow to consider more effective polychemotherapies.     

Biomodulation of Fluorouracil in colorectal cancer

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) remains the agent of choice for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Research has focused on the biomodulation of 5-FU in order to attempt to improve the cytotoxity and therapeutic effectiveness of this drug in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Modulation of 5-FU by methotrexate (MTX), trimetrexate (TMTX), interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), leucovorin (LV), or N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-asparte acid (PALA) has produced higher response rates than those observed with 5-FU alone. Methotrexate may improve the durability of response to or survival with 5-FU, but with inferior results compared with those in trials of 5-FU and leucovorin. Trimetrexate produces a number of responses, and further phase III trials are in progress to confirm the results of promising phase II trials with this drug. IFN-alpha has shown therapeutic efficiency when combined with 5-FU alone or with 5-FU and leucovorin, but latest studies with these combinations have shown increased toxicity. Initial single-institution phase I trials with 5-FU and PALA reported promising responses, but the latter responses with PALA were not substantiated in randomized multicenter trials. Leucovorin enhances the cytotoxic activity of 5-FU in vitro and in vivo, and several clinical trials have shown improved response rates and possible trends in improved survival when such therapy is compared with the use of 5-FU as a single-agent. More recent randomized trials have focused their attention on determining the optimal dose and schedule with this combination for producing a better clinical response with minimal toxicity. Schedules using infusional 5-FU appear to be the most active regimens when 5-FU is used as a single agent, as demonstrated by recent randomized trials. The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) have performed separate randomized trials and have shown that the optimal regimens employ infusional 5-FU as a single agent, and that these are the least toxic regimens, perhaps more effective, and associated with a better quality of life. Future studies will focus on infusional regimens involving either short-term, high-dose protracted or long-term, low-dose protracted infusion of 5-FU, since these regimens have shown the most favorable toxicity spectrum and produced the longest survival times. Future research will also focus on the evaluation of various methods of delivery of 5-FU, including oral administration of the drug in combination with compounds that can modify its catabolism.     

Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer

PURPOSE: This study had two major goals: (1) to assess the effectiveness of a regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole plus leucovorin as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk colon cancer, and (2) to evaluate 6 months versus 12 months of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with poor-prognosis stage II or III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either intensive-course 5-FU and leucovorin combined with levamisole, or a standard regimen of 5-FU plus levamisole. Patients were also randomly assigned to receive either 12 months or 6 months of chemotherapy, which resulted in four treatment groups. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-one of 915 patients entered (97.4%) were eligible. The median follow-up duration is 5.1 years for patients still alive. There was a difference among the four treatment groups with respect to patient survival, and a significant duration-by-regimen interaction was observed. Specifically, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was inferior to 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole when treatment was given for 6 months (5-year survival rate, 60% v 70%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: There was no significant improvement in patient survival when chemotherapy was given for 12 months compared with 6 months. When chemotherapy was given for 6 months, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with inferior patient survival compared with intensive-course 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole. These data suggest that 5-FU plus levamisole for 6 months should not be used in clinical practice, whereas 6 months of treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole is effective.     

Arterial infusion chemotherapy of 5-FU and leucovorin for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Fifteen patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer were treated by arterial infusion of 5-FU and leucovorin. Two regimens were performed. One was weekly bolus infusion of leucovorin following bolus infusion of 5-FU (bolus group), the other was 5 days continuous infusion of 5-FU and leucovorin in 3 weeks (continuous group). One PR was obtained both in the bolus group and in the continuous groups. The objective response rate was 11% in the bolus group and 20% in the continuous group. The one- and 2-year survival rates for these patients were 40% and 0% in the bolus group, and 80% and 60% in the continuous group, respectively. These results suggest that continuous arterial infusion of 5-FU and leucovorin was more effective than individual bolus arterial infusion of leucovorin and 5-FU for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.     

Comparison of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine with 5-fluorouracil and their role in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Despite more than 30 years of intensive studies on new drugs against advanced colorectal cancer, the fluoropyrimidines remain the drugs of choice for systemic treatment and for hepatic artery infusion (HAI). This overview describes new developments in advanced colorectal cancer chemotherapy, providing a rationale for more effective use of the fluoropyrimidines, with biochemical modulation, scheduling or by revealing biochemical mechanisms of action that correlate with antitumour activity. In human colorectal cancer cell lines and various animal tumour model systems 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) is more effective than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Comparably, FdUrd's modulation by leucovorin (LV) is more potent than 5-FU. In animal studies it is shown that intermittent high-bolus administration of FdUrd generates better antitumour activity, compared with equal toxic doses or any other schedule of 5-FU. These effects are related to prolonged-thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition and the prevention of TS induction, rather than RNA incorporation. Preclinical studies with modulators such as N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), WR-2721, mitomycin C and platinum derivatives provide a rationale for clinical use in the future. The first choice systemic chemotherapy of patients with advanced colorectal cancer remains 5-FU combined with LV. Some improvement in therapeutic efficacy has been achieved with locoregional HAI. In randomised studies HAI FdUrd improves the quality of life and survival as compared with optimal systemic therapy. Chronomodulation decreases toxicity, allowing dose intensification, while modulators such as LV or dexamethasone increase survival of patients treated with HAI FdUrd to 86% after 1 year. In conclusion, the clinical use of FdUrd has not been fully explored. Intermittent high-dose FdUrd, chronomodulation together with the use of modulators or drugs focused on prolonged TS inhibition, should be studied in large randomised studies.     

Sequential intrahepatic fluorodeoxyuridine and systemic fluorouracil plus leucovorin for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer confined to the liver

PURPOSE: Extrahepatic metastasis represents a frequent pattern of disease progression when fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) is given by the intraarterial route for the treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Systemic fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin was added to intrahepatic FUDR to prolong the duration of disease control. METHODS: Only patients with colorectal cancer who had evidence of unresectable metastases confined to the liver were eligible. Laparotomy was performed to establish arterial perfusion of the liver. Cycles of intrahepatic FUDR followed by a 1-week rest period then intravenous chemotherapy with 5-FU plus leucovorin were administered until maximal regression of hepatic metastases. Maintenance chemotherapy with 5-FU plus leucovorin was then given until disease progression. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients entered this trial; four patients (7%) were ineligible and 13 (23%) did not receive any chemotherapy on study because of findings at laparotomy. The 40 eligible patients who began chemotherapy are included in the statistical analyses. Twenty-five patients (62% of those who received chemotherapy) experienced regression of liver metastases. The median time to tumor progression was 9 months, but only 3% remained progression-free at 24 months. The median survival duration was 18 months. Toxicity was tolerable with no cases of biliary sclerosis. One treatment-related fatality due to sepsis was observed. CONCLUSION: Although short-term treatment results appear to be somewhat better than we have previously observed with intrahepatic FUDR alone, the sequential regimen did not have an impact on long-term, progression-free survival in patients with unresectable liver metastases. We are now investigating this regimen as surgical adjuvant therapy in selected patients following hepatic metastasectomy where this aggressive approach might have a greater therapeutic effect in the minimal residual disease setting.     

Effects of systemic and regional chemotherapy after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND: Although the survival benefit of hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis has been established, some controversy remains regarding the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatic resection. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients who had liver resection for colorectal metastasis at our hospital between 1980 and 1997 were studied. After curative hepatic resection, 37 patients underwent systemic chemotherapy, administered orally or intravenously, and 38 patients underwent regional chemotherapy, given intra-arterially or intraportally. Forty patients had no adjuvant chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic agents used for oral administration were uracil and Tegafur or Tegafur alone. Mitomycin C (MMC) or 5-FU was used for IV chemotherapy. Combinations of 5-FU/leucovorin or MMC/5-FU (doxorubicin) were used for regional chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to test the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy for patient survival or disease-free survival. RESULTS: Overall 5-year survival was 42.2% (95% CL: 31.2%, 53.2%). Among the possible prognostic factors studied, univariate analysis showed a significant difference in survival based on the number of tumors and lymph node metastases in the hepatic hilum. There was a significant difference in disease-free survival based on adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node metastasis. The multivariate analysis for patient survival selected four prognostic factors (P < .05), including adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, disease-free interval, and tumor size. The multivariate analysis for disease-free survival selected adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, and disease-free interval as significant factors. The most common recurrence site was remnant liver, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved survival and disease-free survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. It did not decrease recurrence rate in the remnant liver.     

Oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (folfox) in pretreated patients with metastatic advanced cancer. The GERCOD

Preliminary studies suggest synergy between oxaliplatin and fluorouracil (5-FU). To assess this issue, we performed a study in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) resistant to leucovorin and 5-FU. Regimen consisted of oxaliplatin day 1, 130 mg/m2 every two cycles (folfox 1) or 100 mg/m2/cycle (folfox 2) or 85 mg/m2/cycle (folfox 3) and leucovorin 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion, followed by 5-FU 22 h infusion 1.5-2 g/m2 for two consecutive days every 2 weeks. One hundred and thirteen patients have been treated. One complete response (CR) and 32 partial responses (PRs) were observed for an overall response rate of 29.2%. Sixty-seven patients had prior documented progression while receiving the same schedule of leucovorin and 5-FU than the one used in the folfox regimens, among them 18 had PRs (26.9%). The best response rate was observed in patients treated with the folfox 2 regimen: 41.7%. From start of folfox, median progression-free survival was 6 months and median survival 13 months. Limiting toxicities were peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. Fifty-four percent of the patients experienced WHO toxicity > or = grade 3 with the folfox1 regimen, 45% with the folfox2 and 40% with the folfox3. The folfox regimens achieve a high response rate in pretreated patients with CRC. Further studies are needed to determine the best oxaliplatin dose-intensity.     

Risk factors for thrombotic events in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica

BACKGROUND: FOLFOX2, a bimonthly regimen of high-dose leucovorin (LV), 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (LV-5-FU) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) produced a high response rate (46%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 31%-60%) in 5-FU pre-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In this phase II study, pre-treated patients were given a lower dose of oxaliplatin to reduce the toxic effects of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma and progression while receiving bimonthly LV-5-FU (LV: 500 mg/m2, 5-FU: 1.5-2 g/m2/22 hours, days 1-2, every two weeks), were given the same LV-5-FU schedule with the addition of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every two weeks (FOLFOX3). RESULTS: The main toxic effects were peripheral neuropathy (90%) with four severe sensitive neuropathies (WHO grade 2: 13%). The response rate was 20% (95% CI: 8%-39%). Median progression-free survival was 26 weeks, median survival was 57 weeks from the start of FOLFOX3 and median duration of the response was 37 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Results obtained with FOLFOX3 confirmed the synergy between oxaliplatin and 5-FU in 5-FU-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the response rate seems to be lower than that obtained with FOLFOX2. Further studies to determine the best oxaliplatin dose intensity are in progress.     

Abnormalities of CD45 isoform expression in HIV infection

Systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the mainstay of treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Administering the drug in a continuous low-dose schedule has produced better result than bolus therapy. Resistance to short-pulse treatment can also be overcome by prolonged exposure. Recent studies suggest the feasibility of biomodulation of 5-FU with recombinant interferon (rIFN alpha-2a) with improved response. Sixteen patients were treated with continuous 5-FU 250 mg/m2 and rIFN alpha-2a 10 x 10(6) u thrice weekly for a maximum of 24 weeks. Five of them had received bolus 5-FU previously. Nine (82%) of the chemonaive group and 1 (20%) previously treated patient had partial response. The median duration of response was 7 months. Grade II to III mucositis were seen in 44% of the patients and 2 patients developed neurological complications. Although the overall response appeared encouraging, the incidence of toxicity was high. In the absence of further phase III studies, rIFN alpha-2a biomodulation of 5-FU cannot be regarded as standard treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.     

A phase II study of irinotecan alternated with five days bolus of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of the alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer, and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion, aged 18-70, with performance status < or = 2, normal baseline biological values and no prior chemotherapy (or only adjuvant chemotherapy completed > or = 6 months before study entry) were selected. Treatment was irinotecan 350 mg/m2, i.v., day 1, alternating with leucovorin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-FU 425 mg/m2, i.v. daily for five consecutive days, day 22-26 (Mayo Clinic regimen). One alternating cycle was to be performed every six weeks. Patients were evaluated for efficacy every alternating cycle. Treatment was administered until five alternating cycles, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (28 chemotherapy-na?ve and five with prior adjuvant treatment completed > 1 year prior to accrual) were enrolled. The objective response rate (RR) was 30% (95% CI: 16-49; 10 patients/33; nine partial response and one complete response). All responses were reviewed by an independent external review committee. An additional 49% of patients had stable disease. The median survival was 16 months, the one year survival amounted to 58% and the median progression free survival was 7.2 months. Relative dose intensity was nearly 90% for both drugs. Grade 3-4 diarrhea and neutropenia were the most frequent severe toxic events, seen in 24% and 64% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The alternating schedule of CPT-11 350 mg/m2 with five days bolus of 5-FU and low dose LV is an active and feasible regimen as front-line therapy for metastatic CRC. It is well tolerated, without evidence of overlapping toxicity. The response rate appears promising with regard to that expected with either single agent. This regimen warrants further assessment in randomized trials.     

Anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM)-antibody-mediated disease with normal renal function

The purpose of this study was to compare the objective response rate, duration of remission, and survival of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus those of 5-FU plus levamisole in metastatic colorectal cancer using the same dose and schedule of these agents as in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and intergroup studies of adjuvant therapy. Patients with no prior history of chemotherapy for metastatic disease were entered on this Hoosier Oncology Group randomized Phase III trial. Patients were stratified by Karnofsky performance status and presence or absence of liver metastases. They were randomized to receive 450 mg/m2 5-FU i.v. for 5 days followed by 15 mg/kg i.v. weekly (arm 1) or the same dose of 5-FU plus levamisole 50 mg p.o. every 8 h for 3 days every 2 weeks (arm 2). The duration of treatment for both arms was 26 weeks. From April 1990 to March 1995, 199 patients were entered. One hundred eighty-two patients, 91 in each arm, were fully evaluable. The response rates were 12% on arm 1 and 13% on arm 2. The median duration of response was 18 weeks on both arms. The median survival was 48 weeks on arm 1 and 41 weeks on arm 2 (P = 0.20). This study failed to show any improvement in survival, response, or duration of remission with the addition of levamisole to 5-FU in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Phase II trials of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic gastric or pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Previous trials in patients with colorectal carcinoma have indicated that enhancement of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin (LV) can result in an improved response rate and increased survival. METHODS: Phase II trials were performed with patients who had either gastric or papcreatic adenocarcinoma with inetastases. Forty-one gastric carcinoma patients and 31 pancreatic carcinoma patients with measurable disease were treated with 5-FU, 425 mg/m2 intraveneosly (i.v.) on Days 1-5 plus LV, 20 mg/m2 i.v., on Days 1-5, reported at 4 and 8 weeks, and then every 5 weeks thereafter. RESULTS: The patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma had a median survival of 4.8 months. There was a 22% objective response rate, including a 4.9% complete response rate and a 17.1% partial response rate. Among the 31 patients with pancreatic carcinoma, there was a median survival of 5.7 months. No patients in this group showed a response. CONCLUSIONS: The response rate for patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma was modest and this regimen may provide temporary palliation for some patients. However, 5-FU and LV treatment is ineffective against metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.     

In vitro percutaneous penetration through hairless rat skin: influence of temperature, vehicle and penetration enhancers

From February 1995 through October 1996, 25 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer showing a clinical resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) entered this study. Thirteen received oxaliplatin alone and 12 received it in combination with 5-FU. Oxaliplatin was administered at 130 mg/m2 over a 2-hour infusion every 3 weeks, alone or added either to 5-FU as a continuous infusion at 200 mg/m2 to 300 mg/m2 (six patients) or to a 5-FU bolus, 375 mg/m2, plus leucovorin, 100 mg/m2, daily for 5 days every 3 weeks (6 patients). Eighty-six of 98 administered cycles were evaluable for toxicity (47 for oxaliplatin plus 5-FU and 39 for oxaliplatin alone). Hematologic toxicity was mild, occurring as grade 2 leukopenia in 23% of the cycles of 5-FU and oxaliplatin and in 5% of the cycles of oxaliplatin alone. The most common toxicity was neurologic (grade 1 to 2 in 60%-6% of the cycles of the combination, respectively, and 68%-10% of oxaliplatin given alone) as hand-foot paresthesia or hypersensitivity to cold. No grade 4 toxicity was reported and only three patients in the 5-FU group developed grade 3 diarrhea. Grade 2 nausea and vomiting occurred in 33% of the cycles when both drugs were given and in 15% when oxaliplatin was administered alone. The combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU induced four partial remissions (33%; 95% confidence interval, 6%-60%), whereas eight patients of the whole group had stable disease. No response occurred when oxaliplatin was administered as a single agent. The results of this study confirm the antitumor activity of oxaliplatin when added to 5-FU in patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer previously refractory to 5-FU. The possible therapeutic synergy with 5-FU was not accompanied by increased toxicity.     

Unknown primary carcinoma: randomised studies are needed to identify optimal treatments and their benefits

This is a retrospective review of 101 patients with unknown primary carcinoma (UPC) treated between 1989 and 1994, on whom data were collected prospectively. 92 patients received platinum-based chemotherapy and 9 had single agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In the platinum group, an objective response rate of 37.2% was seen, with a median duration of 4.5 months (range 1.9-17.5). There were no responses with 5-FU alone, while median survival was 6.4 months and was not different from the platinum group (P = 0.09). Considerable symptomatic resolution was noted, although the contribution of chemotherapy alone to this is difficult to define. The impact of tumour response on quality of life and survival in UPC requires further elucidation in prospective studies with a "best supportive care' arm. The superiority of platinum-based treatments reported in selected subgroups cannot be applied to the whole spectrum of UPC.     

A new complication of chemotherapy administered via permanent indwelling central venous catheter

BACKGROUND: The use of permanent intravenous access devices for chemotherapy administration has become a common practice in clinical oncology. Therefore, awareness of potential complications is important. The authors previously reported the use of high dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (2600 mg/m2) and leucovorin (500 mg/m2) as a weekly 24-hour infusion for patients with colorectal carcinoma. In this report, a new complication of permanent indwelling catheters with high dose 5-fluorouracil (2600 mg/m2) and leucovorin (500 mg/m2) as a weekly 24-hour infusion for colorectal carcinoma is described. METHODS: Twenty-two patients in the previous Phase II trial on weekly high dose 5-FU and leucovorin were included in this study. All patients had either a single-lumen Port-o-cath (Pharmacia Deltec, St. Paul, MN) or Hickman catheter (Travenol Laboratories, Deerfield, IL). Occluded catheters were explanted, and the material found in their lumen was analyzed using infrared spectroscopy. RESULTS: Eleven of 22 patients had catheter blockage, and calcium carbonate formation (Calcite 100%) was identified within these catheters. CONCLUSION: Calcite formation causing catheter occlusion is a new and important complication resulting from using intravenous access devices for chemotherapy administration. Oncologists should be alerted to this phenomenon when high dose 5-FU and leucovorin are administered for 24 hours by continuous infusion using a single-port port-o-cath.     

Dissent over standards in adjuvant management of colon carcinoma

Since 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole substantially reduces the recurrence rate and improves survival in adjuvantly treated patients with curative resected stage III colon cancer this combination has been considered the standard therapy. Shortly thereafter folinic acid modulated 5-FU-therapy also demonstrated adjuvant efficacy compared to surgery alone. Therefore various schedules of folinic acid modulated 5-FU-therapy were compared with the standard regimen (5-FU/levamisole). Randomized multicentric studies revealed: In three of four studies 5-FU/FA is superior to 5-FU/levamisole. Treatment duration of 6 months for 5-FU/FA is similar to 12 months 5-FU/Levamisole. No benefit is obtained for 5-FU/FA by additional levamisole. The effect of regional (portal vein or intraperitoneal) treatment is controversial discussed, but combination of the treatment with systemic chemotherapy versus 5-FU/levamisole demonstrated slightly increased therapeutic efficacy. Immunotherapy with autologous tumor cell-BCG or monoclonal antibody treatment improved survival and is currently investigated in studies with conventional systemic treatment and combined chemoimmunotherapy. Beside treatment in studies patients with colon cancer stage III should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU/FA. Further improvements and adjuvant treatment protocols for stage II carcinoma have to be investigated in studies.     

A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (FLP) for metastatic gastric cancer

The modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (leucovorin, LV) is more efficacious than 5-FU alone in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, and the combination of 5-FU with cisplatin is currently one of the most active regimens in advanced gastric cancer. A phase II study was therefore conducted to test the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of 5-FU, LV and cisplatin (FLP) in metastatic gastric cancer. 28 patients entered the study. Metastatic sites were observed in the liver (in 21 patients), the peritoneum (in 8), the lymph nodes (in 7) or the bones (in 1) and a local recurrence was noted in 4 cases. The performance status (using World Health Organisation criteria) was 0 for 13 patients and 1 or 2 for the others. Cycles of treatment were administered every 28 days and consisted of LV 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2/day for 5 days with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2. The response rate for the 27 evaluable patients was 51.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 33-70.6%). There were four complete responses (14.8%) and 10 partial responses (37%). Median survival was 11 months and 4 patients were alive at 2 years. Both response rate and survival were better for patients with a good performance status. The overall toxicity was very low, except for 1 patient who died of dehydration and cardiac failure. In conclusion, the FLP protocol was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.     

Cervical meningoceles and myelocystoceles: a unifying hypothesis

We initiated a pilot study of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (AHAIC) using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin. Hepatic arterial infusion ports were placed in 15 consecutive patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal liver metastases. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a weekly infusion of 5-FU (12 mg m 2 per day) and leucovorin (200 mg m 2 per day) for 12 months. The mean follow-up was 22 months (range 3-62 months, SD 21-37 months). There were no clinical or biological complications related to chemotherapy, except for sharp epigastric burns in four patients immediately after 5-FU infusions. Catheter irreversible occlusions led to early cessation of the treatment in three patients. Four of the 15 evaluable patients developed recurrent disease. The site of relapse was the liver in two patients and extra-hepatic sites in the two remaining patients. Three of these four patients died of their recurrent disease. These results suggest that 5-FU and leucovorin can be combined for AHAIC in a long duration regimen with a very low rate of side-effects. This protocol could be safely employed in a prospective randomized study in combination with 5-FU systemic infusions.