High-dose therapy with cytostatic agents as primary treatment of advanced breast cancer

Thousands of women with breast cancer have received high dose chemotherapy prior to the results from controlled clinical trials being known. As one of these patients the author reviews and discusses the results of the first randomised study from South Africa. High dose therapy with autologous stem cell support was compared with conventional chemotherapy in 90 young women with metastatic aggressive breast cancer. Though survival was short in both groups the disease free survival was doubled in the high dose group. A significant increase was found in response rate, duration of response and survival. Data from America show the cost effectiveness of this treatment to be comparable to that of other life-saving therapies. A comparison is made with the absolute and relative survival benefit of simvastatin treatment. A Norwegian White Paper on high dose therapy does not include advanced breast cancer in the planned trial protocols. It is argued that future health planning should give high priority to the treatment of advanced breast cancer in young women.     

A combination of ifosfamide and mitoxantrone as salvage therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Ifosfamide (IFX) and mitoxantrone (MXN) have been found to be effective against advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The combination of these two agents has not yet been tested in this setting but seems to be rational, given the different action mechanisms of these drugs and their not completely overlapping side effects. Between June 1987 and November 1991, 37 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma recurrent or refractory to primary cisplatin-based chemotherapy entered the study. Therapy consisted of MXN, given i.v. at 10 mg/m2 on day 1 and IFX given i.v. at 2,000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-3 with mesna. The cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Four patients achieved a complete remission and three achieved a partial remission, for response rates of 18.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3-31.5%] in the whole sample and 38.8% (95% CI 16.3-61.3%) in the subset of 18 patients responding to first-line cisplatin. No response was obtained in the remaining patients, whose disease was refractory to primary platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinically significant toxicity (WHO grades 3-4) included leukopenia in 46% of the patients and anemia in 32.5%. The non-hematologic toxicity was mild, except for reversible alopecia (57%) and nausea and vomiting (48.5%). This regimen seems attractive for patients who have either failed or not received platinum retreatment, especially when limiting neurotoxicity occurs. Further studies are warranted to establish the relative impact of both of these agents.     

Topotecan. A review of its potential in advanced ovarian cancer

The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan has shown antitumour activity against a variety of tumour types in vitro and in vivo. Topotecan in combination with drugs that induce DNA damage generally results in synergistic killing of tumour cells in vitro. As the activity of topotecan is related to exposure time, the drug is administered by intravenous infusion either continuously or once daily over a 30-minute period for several consecutive days. A 30-minute infusion of topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks produced response rates of up to approximately 20% in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who had failed to respond to platinum-based regimens or relapsed after initial response to such regimens. No significant differences in efficacy were apparent between topotecan and paclitaxel in a phase III study in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, although a trend in favour of topotecan was evident for all major efficacy parameters. Non-cumulative myelosuppression, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia, is the dose-limiting toxicity associated with topotecan. Myelo-suppression was significantly more common with topotecan than with paclitaxel in a single comparative study. Non-haematological adverse events in topotecan recipients are generally mild and include alopecia, nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal problems. Thus, topotecan has modest efficacy in the treatment of recurrent advanced ovarian cancer, with clinical activity similar to that of paclitaxel in a large randomised phase III study in this setting. Combinations of paclitaxel and a platinum compound are being used increasingly for first-line therapy, although relapse rates remain significant. Topotecan is therefore a suitable second-line option, providing antitumour response for some patients whose disease has relapsed after, or is refractory to, platinum-based therapy. Its wider potential when used either alone or in combination regimens should become clearer from ongoing studies.     

Carboplatin in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. A phase II study

Seventy-one patients with epithelial ovarian cancer stage III (n = 56) or IV (n = 15) were treated with carboplatin 300 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 every fourth week. Patients clinically free of tumour after six courses (n = 58) underwent a second-look laparotomy. Seventeen patients were microscopically tumour-free (24% of all) and an additional 10 (14%) had only microscopic cancer. Median time to progression was 19 months. The median survival was 33 months and the estimated 5-year survival 27%. The toxicity was mainly haematological, with leukopenia WHO grade 3-4 seen in 88% and thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 42% of the patients. The gastrointestinal toxicity was mild and no renal toxicity was seen. This chemotherapy regimen was effective with acceptable toxicity and could be given on an out-patient basis. The possibility of increasing the efficacy and decreasing the toxicity was discussed.     

Patterns of inheritance of ovarian cancer. An analysis from an ovarian cancer screening program

BACKGROUND: A variety of inheritance patterns for familial ovarian cancer have been proposed including an autosomal dominant inheritance, a breast-ovary cancer syndrome and Lynch Cancer Family Syndrome (involving breast, bowel, ovary, and endometrial cancers). METHODS: Women participating in an ovarian cancer screening study completed a questionnaire concerning their family history of ovarian and other malignancies (in particular breast, bowel, and endometrial cancer). Confirmation of the diagnosis was sought when there was uncertainty. RESULTS: Two hundred forty women with a first-degree relative with ovarian cancer participated in the study. Nine percent of these women (representing 13 families) gave a definite history of two or more affected first-degree relatives. Two families had a pedigree consistent with an autosomal dominant inheritance. A breast-ovary cancer family and a Lynch cancer family syndrome were suspected in one family each, although 34% of all women gave a history of at least one other first-degree relative with either breast, bowel, or endometrial cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small number of women with a family history of ovarian cancer fit into the recognized hereditary patterns. Difficulty in recognizing the inheritance patterns and the lack of definitive genetic markers poses problems in providing adequate counseling regarding screening and prophylactic oophorectomy.     

The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer

In this study, 16 experienced oncologists each measured 12 simulated tumor masses employing their usual clinical methods. Unknown to the oncologists, two pairs of these tumors were identical in size. This permitted a total of 64 measurement comparisons of the same investigator measuring the same size mass and 1920 comparisons of different investigators measuring the same size mass. If a 50% reduction in the product of perpendicular diameters is accepted as a criterion, the objective response rate due to measuring error alone was 7.8% by the same investigator and 6.8% by different investigators. If a 25% reduction criterion is used, the respective "placebo" response rates were 19% and 25%. In the clinical setting it is recommended that the 50% reduction criterion be employed and that the investigator should anticipate an objective response rate of 5 to 10% due to human error in tumor measurement.     

Quality of life in advanced prostate cancer: results of a randomized therapeutic trial

BACKGROUND: For patients with metastatic prostate cancer, treatment is primarily palliative, relying mainly on the suppression of systemic androgen hormone levels. To help document the achievement of palliation and to characterize positive and negative effects of treatment, we evaluated quality-of-life (QOL) parameters in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to two methods of androgen deprivation. METHODS: Patients (n = 739) with stage M1 (bone or soft tissue metastasis) prostate cancer were enrolled in a QOL protocol that was a companion to Southwest Oncology Group INT-0105, a randomized double-blind trial comparing treatment with bilateral orchiectomy (surgical castration) plus either flutamide or placebo. Patients completed a comprehensive battery of QOL questionnaires at random assignment to treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months later. Data were collected on three treatment-specific symptoms (diarrhea, gas pain, and body image), on physical functioning, and on emotional functioning. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Questionnaire return rates for this study never dropped below 80%; only 2% of the patients did not submit baseline QOL assessments. Cross-sectional analyses (corrected for multiple testing) identified statistically significant differences that favored orchiectomy plus placebo for two of the five primary QOL parameters as follows: patients receiving flutamide reported more diarrhea at 3 months (P = .001) and worse emotional functioning at 3 and 6 months (both P<.003). Longitudinal analyses replicated these findings. Other analyzed QOL parameters favored the group receiving placebo but were not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: We found a consistent pattern of better QOL outcomes at each follow-up assessment during the first 6 months of treatment for orchiectomized patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received placebo versus flutamide. Improvement over time was evident in both treatment groups but more so for patients receiving placebo.     

Increased cell-surface urokinase in advanced ovarian cancer

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), uPA receptors, and cathepsin B were quantitated by using an immunological method, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and amidolytic activity assays in 15 malignant and 10 benign epithelial ovarian tumors. The levels of uPA and uPA receptors, as well as cathepsin B, were found to be higher in membrane preparations obtained from malignant tumors than in those obtained from benign tumors. Acid-treated membranes acquired the ability to bind uPA, indicating that uPA is bound to a specific surface receptor that is not completely saturated. Levels of single-chain uPA (pro-uPA) and high-molecular-weight uPA in membrane preparations were measured by immunoadsorbent-amidolytic assay. The finding of a significant increase in amidolytic activity following activation of uPAs by plasmin suggested that less than half (30-40%) of all membrane immunoreactive uPAs is present in the enzymatically inactive pro-uPA form. In the membranes of malignant tumors, levels of uPA receptor and cathepsin B did not vary with stage of disease. On the other hand, we found that the level of receptor-bound uPA antigen/activity was significantly increased in advanced malignant tumors. Receptor-bound uPA may play an important role in determining invasive potential of tumor cells. Since ovarian cancer cells produce both pro-uPA and cathepsin B, the possibility of activation of tumor cell-derived pro-uPA by cellular protease cathepsin B must be considered.     

A case of advanced vulvar cancer treated with combination therapy

Presented is a patient with advanced vulvar cancer involving the vagina, the perineum and the anus, with metastases to inguinal lymph nodes. The patient received irradiation and next, an artificial sigmoidal anus was made, with simultaneous vulvectomy performed with an electrosurgery. The patient's survival of 3 years and 3 months encourages to consider in such cases an attempt at applying aggressive surgical treatment combined with external radiotherapy.     

Maximal cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

The standard form of surgical intervention in advanced ovarian cancer is to undertake a pelvic clearance, and remove all tumour. When the latter is not feasible, then a ‘debulking’ operation is performed. This is a procedure whereby the intra-abdominal tumour load is reduced to what is termed ‘optimum’ residual disease (which has varied definitions). Compared with other intra-abdominal solid tumours, this approach is unique to ovarian malignancies. Whilst many retrospective studies, and meta-analyses may indicate that patients with ‘optimum’ debulking survive longer than those with a greater amount of residual disease, the reality is that this surgical intervention has never been exposed to a randomised controlled trial. Therefore, rather than ‘optimum’ debulking enhancing survival, it could be that the ability to achieve the ‘optimum’ is only reflecting the inherent tumour biology of a more chemo-sensitive disease. This debate will continue until such studies are completed.     

Treatment of ovarian cancer with photodynamic therapy and immunoconjugates in a murine ovarian cancer model

In photodynamic therapy (PDT), photosensitisers accumulate somewhat preferentially in malignant tissues; photoactivation with appropriate wavelength of light release toxic molecular species which lead to tumour tissue death. In order to target ovarian cancer with increased specificity, a chlorin-based photosensitiser (chlorin e6 monoethylendiamine monoamide) was conjugated to OC125, a monoclonal antibody recognising an antigen expressed in 80% of non-mucinous ovarian cancers. In previous work, this immunoconjugate (IC) was shown to be selectively phototoxic to cancer cells from ovarian cancer patients ex vivo and to localise preferentially in ovarian cancer tissue in vivo. In this study we report results from in vivo phototoxicology and photodynamic treatment studies using this IC in a murine model for ovarian cancer. A comparison of single vs multiple treatments was also made. For in vivo experimentation, Balb C nude mice were injected with 30 x 10(6) NIH:OVCAR 3 cancer cells to create an ascitic tumour model. Animals were then given intraperitoneal injections of the immunoconjugate (0.5 mg kg-1). Twenty-four hours later the intraperitoneal surfaces were exposed to 656 nm light from an argon-ion pumped-dye laser (50 mW, 656 nm), using a cylindrical diffusing tip fibre. The overall treatment was given either once or multiply. No animals died from treatment complications. Twenty-four hours following one and three PDT treatments, the percentage of viable tumour cells in the ascites of the treated animals analysed ex vivo was 34% and 5% of control for one and three treatments respectively. With respect to survival, all control mice (n = 18) died between 30 and 50 days. However, for those treated three times (n = 10), 40% were still alive after 50 days, and for those treated four times (n = 12) 58% were alive after 50 days. Evaluation with log-rank test revealed a significant survival with intraperitoneal PDT compared with controls (P = 0.0006). These preliminary results suggest that PDT with an OC125 immunoconjugate may be an effective therapy for the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Clinical application of this therapy needs to be further optimised and may require multiple treatments, similar to fractionated radiation therapy and cyclic chemotherapy, in order to control malignant disease with acceptable toxicity to normal tissue.     

Dose intensity analysis in advanced ovarian cancer patients

To determine if chemotherapy dose intensity influences treatment outcome in advanced ovarian cancer, all randomised studies of first line chemotherapy, published between 1975 and 1989, were analysed for relationships between planned dose intensity and (a) objective response and (b) median survival. Total dose intensity of each study regimen was calculated and a weighted regression model providing for systemic differences in response or survival among studies was utilised. Hence, treatment arms of different studies were never directly compared. In addition, relative dose intensities of individual drugs within combinations was similarly evaluated. The improvement in objective response rate when adding one unit of total dose intensity ranged between 12% and 16% depending on baseline response rate. The improvement in median survival when adding one unit of total dose intensity ranged between 2 and 4 months. One unit of total dose intensity corresponds to, for example, 20 mg m2 week of cisplatin, or 25 mg m2 week of doxorubicin, or 350 mg m2 week of cyclophosphamide. The analysis of individual drugs suggested that doxorubicin and the platinum compounds were about equally effective, with cyclophosphamide being less effective. The methodological benefits and limitations of the approach used and the implication of the results are discussed.     

Angiogenic protein expression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

We set out to determine whether advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is associated with elevated serum and ascitic concentrations of the angiogenic factors angiogenin (ANG), basic fibroblastic growth factor (bFGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and whether the expression of angiogenic factors was associated with tumor vascularity. Serum and ascitic samples were collected from previously untreated patients with FIGO stage III and IV EOC and stored at -70 degreesC. Levels of the three factors were determined by enzyme-linked immunoassay. Histological sections from paraffin blocks of ovarian cancers were stained immunochemically for factor VIII, CD34, and VEGF. Thirty-nine patients were studied, although not all had paired serum and ascitic samples. For each angiogenic factor, the following findings were noted: (a) there was a wide range in serum and ascitic fluid concentrations; (b) the mean serum concentration was higher (P < 0.05) than the mean concentration in normal serum; and (c) the mean serum concentration was lower (P < 0. 05) than the mean ascitic concentration. Overall, the most consistent pattern of elevated serum and ascitic concentrations was with bFGF. With serum samples, 38.9% of patients had a normal VEGF concentration, as did 15.3% for ANG and 7.7% for bFGF. In ascites, the VEGF concentration was in the range for normal serum in 24.5% of samples, compared to 39.4% for ANG and 2.8% for bFGF. In paired samples, both VEGF and bFGF showed higher ascitic concentrations in 100 and 88.3% of samples, compared to 53.3% for ANG. There was no correlation between the serum and/or ascitic concentration of one factor and that of another, suggesting that these factors are independently regulated. Staining with anti-CD34 was more sensitive and reliable than with anti-factor VIII. VEGF staining was most prominent in poorly differentiated tumors and was observed only on tumor cells. There was no correlation between the serum or ascitic concentrations of angiogenic factors and tumor vascularity. Advanced EOC is associated with raised serum and ascitic bFGF concentrations and with markedly elevated ascitic VEGF in most cases. Serum VEGF and serum and ascitic ANG are less often elevated. There was no correlation between the angiogenic profile in serum and ascites and tumor vascularity.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine in platinum pre-treated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer will relapse following platinum-based combination chemotherapy and be considered for second-line treatment. Gemcitabine, a nucleoside analogue, is active against a range of solid tumors. This phase II study investigated the activity of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with FIGO stage III (34%) or IV (64%) ovarian cancer who were previously treated with platinum-containing regimens were enrolled. Patients received 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Patients completed an average of 3.6 cycles. Two complete and three partial responses were seen in 36 evaluable patients, for an overall response rate of 13.9% (95% CI: 4.7%-29.5%). The median survival time was 6.7 months. Toxicities were generally mild. The most common were grade 3-4 neutropenia and grade 3 leukopenia reported in 23.7% and 10.5% of patients, respectively. One patient had grade 4 pulmonary toxicity. CONCLUSION: Single-agent gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.     

Palliative therapy in advanced ovarian cancer: balancing patient expectations, quality of life and cost

The goals of chemotherapy for recurrent/refractory ovarian cancer are the palliation of disease-related symptoms, and improvement of quality and quantity of life. Previous studies of palliative therapy in advanced ovarian cancer have focused on surrogate measures of patient benefit rather than evaluating palliative end-points such as quality of life and clinical benefit. The impact of palliative chemotherapy on survival, quality of life and cost in advanced ovarian cancer are unknown as there have been no studies comparing palliative treatment with best supportive care. Although there is insufficient information from existing studies to determine whether palliative therapy in advanced ovarian cancer is cost-effective, there is some evidence to suggest that chemotherapy has a role in palliation of symptoms with an apparent improvement in quality of life. We relate the results of two studies. (i) A prospective study evaluating the cost of second/third-line chemotherapy as well as its effectiveness, which found the mean total cost per patient for the study period (one line of chemotherapy) was Canadian $12500. In addition, half of patients seemed to derive some palliative benefit and a quarter of patients had an objective response in their disease. (ii) A retrospective study evaluating all costs from the initiation of palliative chemotherapy until death which demonstrated a cost of Canadian $53000 per patient. Our studies demonstrate that patient expectations of palliative therapy in ovarian cancer are high and patients are willing to put up with significant toxicity for modest benefit. Although palliative therapy may be associated with high costs, even modest prolongation of survival can render such treatment cost-effective. The major cost saving associated with palliative therapy is from the reduced need for hospitalization towards the end of life. Future studies in recurrent/refractory ovarian cancer should focus on palliative end-points and include a comparison with best supportive care.     

Salvage mitomycin/5-fluorouracil after platinum-based therapy for women with advanced ovarian cancer and related gynecologic malignancies

PURPOSE: to determine response rates, survival, and toxicity of a regimen of mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil in patients previously treated with platinum-based combinations for ovarian cancer and related gynecologic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: retrospective chart review of all cases of persistent or recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with mitomycin-C 7 mg/m2 followed by continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2/day over 4 days. RESULTS: 26 patients were treated after a median of 2 prior platinum-based regimens, 22 with ovarian cancer, 3 with peritoneal cancer, and one with fallopian tube cancer. Only 2 patients completed 6 or more cycles. 2 patients had partial responses (8%); no complete responses were seen. 24 patients died a median of 3 months after the initiation of therapy, while 2 patients were alive 4 and 8 months after beginning therapy. All deaths were attributable to disease, not complications of treatment. 8 patients required dose modification or treatment delay for toxicity. Nine patients required a total of 11 unscheduled admissions. CONCLUSIONS: toxicity attributable to mitomycin-C/5-fluorouracil therapy of ovarian cancer is acceptable, but responses are few. More effective alternative should be sought.