Power of a Unit‐Root Test and the Initial Condition

Abstract. It is now well known that how the initial observation is generated can have a significant effect on the power of a unit‐root test. In this article, we show that by taking a simple data‐dependent weighted average of the initial condition‐robust test of Elliott and Müller [Journal of Econometrics (2006), forthcoming] and the standard augmented Dickey–Fuller test, we are able to produce a new unit‐root test that can improve power, both asymptotically and in finite samples, over a wide range of possibilities governing the generation of the initial observation.     

A HYBRID BOOTSTRAP APPROACH TO UNIT ROOT TESTS

This article proposes a hybrid bootstrap approach to approximate the augmented Dickey–Fuller test by perturbing both the residual sequence and the minimand of the objective function. Since innovations can be dependent, this allows the inclusion of conditional heteroscedasticity models. The new bootstrap method is also applied to least absolute deviation‐based unit root test statistics, which are efficient in handling heavy‐tailed time‐series data. The asymptotic distributions of resulting bootstrap tests are presented, and Monte Carlo studies demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed tests.     

Examination of Some More Powerful Modifications of the Dickey–Fuller Test

Abstract. Although the t‐ratio variant of the Dickey–Fuller test is the most commonly applied unit‐root test in practical applications, it has been known for some time that readily implementable, more powerful modifications are available. We explore the large‐sample properties of five of these modified tests, and the small‐sample properties of these five plus six hybrids. As a result of this study we recommend two particular test procedures.     

Unit‐root testing: on the asymptotic equivalence of Dickey–Fuller with the log–log slope of a fitted autoregressive spectrum

In this article we consider the problem of testing for the presence of a unit root against autoregressive alternatives. In this context we prove the asymptotic equivalence of the well‐known (augmented) Dickey–Fuller test with a test based on an appropriate parametric modification of the technique of log‐periodogram regression. This modification consists of considering, close to the origin, the slope (in log–log coordinates) of an autoregressively fitted spectral density. This provides a new interpretation of the Dickey–Fuller test and closes the gap between it and log‐periodogram regression. This equivalence is based on monotonicity arguments and holds on the null as well as on the alternative. Finally, a simulation study provides indications of the finite‐sample behaviour of this asymptotic equivalence.     

On the use of Sub‐sample Unit Root Tests to Detect Changes in Persistence

Abstract. We investigate the behaviour of rolling and recursive augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) tests against processes which display changes in persistence. We show that the power of the tests depend crucially on the window width and warm up parameter for the rolling and recursive procedures respectively, on whether forward or reverse recursive sequences of tests are computed, and on the persistence change process generating the data. To ameliorate these dependencies we extend the available critical values for these tests, and propose a number of new sub‐sample unit root tests for which finite sample and asymptotic critical values are also provided. An empirical illustration on OECD real output data is also provided.     

Bootstrap Unit‐Root Tests: Comparison and Extensions

Abstract. In this article, we study and compare the properties of several bootstrap unit‐root tests recently proposed in the literature. The tests are Dickey–Fuller (DF) or Augmented DF, based either on residuals from an autoregression and the use of the block bootstrap or on first‐differenced data and the use of the stationary bootstrap or sieve bootstrap. We extend the analysis by interchanging the data transformations (differences vs. residuals), the types of bootstrap and the presence or absence of a correction for autocorrelation in the tests. We show that two sieve bootstrap tests based on residuals remain asymptotically valid. In contrast to the literature which focuses on a comparison of the bootstrap tests with an asymptotic test, we compare the bootstrap tests among themselves using response surfaces for their size and power in a simulation study. This study leads to the following conclusions: (i) augmented DF tests are always preferred to standard DF tests; (ii) the sieve bootstrap performs better than the block bootstrap; (iii) difference‐based tests appear to have slightly better size properties, but residual‐based tests appear more powerful.     

Testing for a unit root under errors with just barely infinite variance

Abstract. This article investigates the problem of testing for a unit root in the case that the error, {u_t}, of the model is a strictly stationary, mixing process with just barely infinite variance. Such errors have the property that for every δ such that 0 ≤ δ < 2, the moments E|u_t|^δ are finite. Under some additional restrictions on the rate of decay of the mixing rates, these errors belong to the domain of the non‐normal attraction of the normal law and obey the invariance principle. This in turn implies that there might be conditions under which the usual Phillips‐type test statistics for unit roots may still converge to the corresponding Dickey–Fuller distributions. In such a case, the unit‐root hypothesis can be tested within an infinite‐variance framework without any modifications to either the tests themselves or the critical values employed. This article derives a necessary and sufficient condition for convergence of the standard test statistics to the Dickey–Fuller distributions. By means of Monte Carlo simulations, the article also shows that this condition is likely to hold in the case that {u_t} is a serially correlated, integrated generalized autoregressive conditionally heteroskedastic (IGARCH) process and the standard unit‐root tests work well.     

The power of unit root tests against nonlinear local alternatives

This article extends the analysis of local power of unit root tests in a nonlinear direction by considering local nonlinear alternatives and tests built specifically against stationary nonlinear models. In particular, we focus on the popular test proposed by Kapetanios et al. (2003, Journal of Econometrics 112, 359–379) in comparison to the linear Dickey–Fuller test. To this end, we consider different adjustment schemes for deterministic terms. We provide asymptotic results which imply that the error variance has a severe impact on the behaviour of the tests in the nonlinear case; the reason for such behaviour is the interplay of non‐stationarity and nonlinearity. In particular, we show that nonlinearity of the data generating process can be asymptotically negligible when the error variance is moderate or large (compared to the ‘amount of nonlinearity’), rendering the linear test more powerful than the nonlinear one. Should however the error variance be small, the nonlinear test has better power against local alternatives. We illustrate this in an asymptotic framework of what we call persistent nonlinearity. The theoretical findings of this article explain previous results in the literature obtained by simulation. Furthermore, our own simulation results suggest that the user‐specified adjustment scheme for deterministic components (e.g. OLS, GLS, or recursive adjustment) has a much higher impact on the power of unit root tests than accounting for nonlinearity, at least under local (linear or nonlinear) alternatives.     

Testing for a Unit Root in Autoregressive Moving-average Models with Missing Data

Testing for a single autoregressive unit root in an autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) model is considered in the case when data contain missing values. The proposed test statistics are based on an ordinary least squares type estimator of the unit root parameter which is a simple approximation of the one-step Newton–Raphson estimator. The limiting distributions of the test statistics are the same as those of the regression statistics in AR(1) models tabulated by Dickey and Fuller (Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc . 74 (1979), 427–31) for the complete data situation. The tests accommodate models with a fitted intercept and a fitted time trend.     

A Sieve Bootstrap For The Test Of A Unit Root

Abstract. In this paper, we consider a sieve bootstrap for the test of a unit root in models driven by general linear processes. The given model is first approximated by a finite autoregressive integrated process of order increasing with the sample size, and then the method of bootstrap is applied for the approximated autoregression to obtain the critical values for the usual unit root tests. The resulting tests, which may simply be viewed as the bootstrapped versions of Augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) unit root tests by Said and Dickey (1984 ), are shown to be consistent under very general conditions. The asymptotic validity of the bootstrap ADF unit root tests is thus established. Our conditions are significantly weaker than those used by Said and Dickey. Simulations show that bootstrap provides substantial improvements on finite sample sizes of the tests.     

Continuous manufacturing: Is the process mean stationary?

The statistical framework to systematically detect mean stationarity in the context of continuous manufacturing is described in this article. The methods presented in this article use econometric and financial time‐series analysis concepts in the form of unit‐root and stationarity hypothesis tests. The tests under discussion are the augmented Dickey‐Fuller, Philips‐Perron, Leybourne‐McCabe, and Kwiatkowski‐Phillips‐Schmidt‐Shin. These hypothesis tests are evaluated on data generated by a focused‐beam reflectance measurement sensor implemented on‐line in a continuous plug‐flow crystallizer. This contribution has shown that the hypothesis tests can be used to detect steady‐state conditions on‐line in a plug‐flow crystallizer. Furthermore, this econometric framework can be used as a mean stationarity “certificate” of collected samples to document that the process was mean stationary during the sampling. The statistical framework described in this article can be applied to any continuously operated unit operation or sensor measurement. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 64: 2426–2437, 2018     

IV‐BASED COINTEGRATION TESTING IN DEPENDENT PANELS WITH TIME‐VARYING VARIANCE

The distributions of cointegration tests are affected when the innovation variance varies over time. In panels, one must also pay attention to dependence among units. To obtain a panel cointegration test robust to both heteroskedasticity and dependence, we adapt the nonlinear instruments method proposed for the Dickey–Fuller test by Chang (2002, J Econometrics 110, 261–292) to an error‐correction framework. We show that IV‐based testing of the no error‐correction null in individual equations yields standard normal test statistics when computed with heteroskedasticity‐robust standard errors. The result holds under endogenous regressors, irrespective of the number of integrated covariates and for any variance profile. A non‐cointegration test combining single‐equation tests retains these nice properties. In panels of fixed cross‐sectional dimension, such test statistics from individual units are shown to be asymptotically independent even under dependence, leading to panel tests robust to dependence and heteroskedasticity. The tests perform well in finite panels.     

TESTING FOR A UNIT ROOT IN AN AR(1) TIME SERIES USING IRREGULARLY OBSERVED DATA

Abstract. For an AR(1) model having a unit root with nonconsecutively observed or missing data we consider the ordinary least squares estimator, the one-step Newton-Raphson estimator and an ordinary least squares type estimator which is a simple approximation of the Newton-Raphson estimator. It is shown that the limiting distributions of these estimators of the unit root are the same as those of the regression estimators as tabulated by Dickey and Fuller (Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 74 (1979), 427–31) for the complete data situation. Simulation results show that our proposed unit root tests perform very well for small samples.     

Dickey–Fuller, Lagrange Multiplier and Combined Tests for a Unit Root in Autoregressive Time Series

In this paper we investigate (augmented) Dickey–Fuller (DF) and Lagrange multiplier (LM) type unit root tests for autoregressive time series through comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations. We consider two sorts of null and alternative hypotheses: a unit root without drift versus level stationarity and a unit root with drift versus trend stationarity. The DF-type coef ficient tests are found to show the best overall performance in both cases, at least if the sample size is sufficiently large. How ever, it is also found that the DF and LM tests are roughly complementary with regard to their finite-sample power. We therefore consider combining these two types of unit root tests to obtain ( ad hoc 'but') 'robust' test procedures. Critical values for the proposed tests are provided     

Joint Hypothesis Tests for a Unit Root When There is a Break in the Innovation Variance

Abstract. We develop extensions of the Dickey–Fuller F‐statistics for the joint null hypothesis of a unit root that allows for a break in the innovation variance. Our statistics are based on the modified generalized least squares (GLS) strategy outlined in Kim, Leybourne and Newbold [Journal of Econometrics (2002) Vol. 109, pp. 365–387] that requires estimation of the break‐date and corresponding pre‐break and post‐break variances. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the new F‐statistics, tabulate their finite sample and asymptotic critical values, and present finite sample simulation evidence regarding their size and power.     

A computationally convenient unit root test with covariates,conditional heteroskedasticity and efficient detrending

When testing for a unit root in a time series, in spite of the well‐known power problem of univariate tests, it is quite common to use only the information regarding the autoregressive behaviour contained in that series. In a series of influential papers, Elliott et al. (Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root, Econometrica 64, 813–836, 1996), Hansen (Rethinking the univariate approach to unit root testing: using covariates to increase power, Econometric Theory 11, 1148–1171, 1995a) and Seo (Distribution theory for unit root tests with conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 91, 113–144, 1999) showed that this practice can be rather costly and that the inclusion of the extraneous information contained in the near‐integratedness of many economic variables, their heteroskedasticity and their correlation with other covariates can lead to substantial power gains. In this article, we show how these information sets can be combined into a single unit root test.     

On the Robustness of Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Double Unit Roots

We examine some of the consequences on commonly used unit root tests when the underlying series is integrated of order two rather than of order one. It turns out that standard augmented Dickey–Fuller type of tests for a single unit root have excessive density in the explosive region of the distribution. The lower (stationary) tail, however, will be virtually unaffected in the presence of double unit roots. On the other hand, the Phillips–Perron class of semi-parametric tests is shown to diverge to plus infinity asymptotically and thus favouring the explosive alternative. Numerical simulations are used to demonstrate the analytical results and some of the implications in finite samples.     

Long-Memory Errors in Time Series Regressions with a Unit Root

This paper is concerned with estimation and inference in univariate time series regression with a unit root when the error sequence exhibits long-range temporal dependence. We consider generating mechanisms for the unit root process which include models with or without a drift term and we study the limit behavior of least squares statistics in regression models without drift and trend, with drift but no time trend, and with drift and time trend. We derive the limit distribution and rate of convergence of the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator of the unit root, the intercept and the time trend in the three regression models and for the two different data-generating processes. The limiting distributions for the OLS estimator differ from those obtained under the hypothesis of weakly dependent errors not only in terms of the limiting process involved but also in terms of functional form. Further, we characterize the asymptotic behavior of both the t statistics for testing the unit root hypothesis and the t statistic for the intercept and time trend coefficients. We find that t ratios either diverge to infinity or collapse to zero. The limiting behavior of Phillips's Z _α and Z _t semiparametric corrections is also analyzed and found to be similar to that of standard Dickey– Fuller tests. Our results indicate that misspecification of the temporal dependence features of the error sequence produces major effects on the asymptotic distribution of estimators and t ratios and suggest that alternative approaches might be more suited to testing for a unit root in time series regression.     

Constructing Optimal tests on a Lagged dependent variable

Abstract. Via the leading unit‐root case, the problem of testing on a lagged dependent variable is characterized by a nuisance parameter which is present only under the alternative [see Andrews and Ploberger, Econometrica (1994 ) Vol. 62, pp. 1318–1414]. This has proven to be a barrier to the construction of optimal tests. Moreover, in their absence it is impossible to objectively assess the absolute power properties of existing tests. Indeed, feasible tests based upon the optimality criteria used here are found to have numerically superior power properties to both the original Dickey and Fuller [Econometrica (1981 ) Vol. 49, pp. 1057–1072] statistics and the efficient detrended versions suggested by Elliott et al. [Econometrica (1996 ) Vol. 64, pp. 813–836] and analysed in Burridge and Taylor [Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (2000 ) Vol. 62, pp. 633–645].     

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON DICKEY-FULLER-TYPE TESTS

Abstract. The empirical performance of tests of the Dickey–Fuller type for unit autoregressive roots in the generating model of a time series is studied. In particular, the case where the true generating model structure is unknown and may involve a substantial moving-average component is examined.