Studying psychotherapy using the one-with-many design: The therapeutic alliance as an exemplar.

Most psychotherapy research uses a one-with-many design, in which each therapist (the one) treats multiple clients (the many), which raises the challenge of nonindependent data. We present a statistical model for analyzing data from studies that use a one-with-many design. This model addresses the problems associated with nonindependence and can address theoretically relevant questions. To illustrate this model, we analyzed data in which 65 therapists and their 227 clients rated their therapeutic alliance. The primary finding was that both therapist and client alliance ratings were largely relational (i.e., specific to the unique therapist–client combination). There was little consensus among clients treated by the same therapist about the quality of the therapeutic alliance, although some therapists reported forming stronger alliances than other therapists. There was substantial dyadic reciprocity, indicating that if a therapist reported an especially good alliance with a particular client (better than with his or her other clients), then that client was also likely to report an especially good alliance (better than those reported by the therapist’s other clients). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Countertransference, attachment, and the working alliance: The therapist's contribution.

This study examined the relationship among therapist attachment styles, countertransference behaviors, and working alliance. Fifty therapists in training and their supervisors participated in the study. Therapists completed a self-rated measure of attachment style and a measure of working alliance with 1 of their clients. Supervisors completed measures of working alliance and countertransference behaviors about their supervisee's relationship with the same client. Results indicate that therapist attachment style did not correlate with either countertransference behaviors or working alliance. However, negative countertransference was associated with poorer working alliances, and positive countertransference was related to a weak bond within the working alliance. Additional analyses indicate that disagreement among supervisors and therapists about the bond component was predictive of countertransference behaviors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The dependability of alliance assessments: The alliance–outcome correlation is larger than you might think.

Objective: To examine the dependability of alliance scores at the patient and therapist level, to evaluate the potential causal direction of session-to-session changes in alliance and depressive symptoms, and to investigate the impact of aggregating the alliance over progressively more sessions on the size of the alliance–outcome relationship. Method: We used data from a study (N = 45 patients; N = 9 therapists) of psychotherapy for major depressive disorder in which the alliance was measured at every treatment session to calculate generalizability coefficients and to predict change in depressive symptoms from alliance scores. Two replication samples were also used. Results: At the therapist level, a large number of patients (about 60) per therapist is needed to provide a dependable therapist-level alliance score. At the patient level, generalizability coefficients revealed that a single assessment of the alliance is only marginally acceptable. Very good (>.90) dependability at the patient level is only achieved through aggregating 4 or more assessments of the alliance. Session-to-session change in the alliance predicted subsequent session-to-session changes in symptoms. Evidence for reverse causation was found in later-in-treatment sessions, suggesting that only aggregates of early treatment alliance scores should be used to predict outcome. Session 3 alliance scores explained 4.7% of outcome variance, but the average of Sessions 3–9 explained 14.7% of outcome variance. Conclusion: Adequate assessment of the alliance using multiple patients per therapist and at least 4 treatment sessions is crucial for fully understanding the size of the alliance–outcome relationship. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

The alliance.

Two decades of empirical research have consistently linked the quality of the alliance between therapist and client with therapy outcome. The magnitude of this relation appears to be independent of the type of therapy and whether the outcome is assessed from the perspective of the therapist, client, or observer. Although the strength of the connection between alliance and therapy outcome appears to be relatively uniform throughout therapy, the client's report of the early alliance may be the most clinically useful indicator. In successful treatments, the therapist's and client's assessments of the alliance tend to converge over time. Recent research suggests that the therapist's skills and personal factors both influence the likelihood of developing a good therapeutic alliance with the client. Though the relation between the therapist's level of training and the quality of the alliance is inconsistent, it is likely that the more trained therapists are able to form better alliances with severely impaired clients. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Attachment to the therapist.

This study examines the ways in which therapists function as attachment figures for patients. Patients in long-term psychoanalytic therapy answered questionnaires about their feelings about their therapists and their closest personal relationships. Components of attachment prominent in the therapeutic relationships were looking up to the therapist and feeling the therapist was responsive to emotional needs. Stronger attachment to therapists was associated with greater frequency and duration of therapy, a stronger working alliance, and greater security of the patients' attachment style, as well as with the gender of the patient and therapist. Using attachment theory to understand psychoanalytic relationships emphasizes the unique importance of a therapist to a patient and can offer new perspectives on both therapeutic and attachment processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Weakenings and repairs of the working alliance in short-term psychotherapy.

Investigated how the weakening and repair of the working alliance in short-term psychotherapies relates to change in therapy. In 6 short-term, time-limited therapies involving 4 therapists and 6 patients, weakenings and repairs were identified with a unitized process ratings scale. Though the data must be considered preliminary, interesting relations emerged. Patients with greater ego strength had a higher initial quality of alliance with their therapist and were better able to work to repair any weakenings. These patients also exhibited a growing use of observing ego in their increasing ability to initiate talk about weakenings. Highest levels of patient alliance were preceded by high levels of therapist repair action. The success with which weakenings and repairs were handled was predictive of the general outcome of therapy. Surprisingly, more frequent interpretations of transference allusions were associated with poor outcome. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Do Gender and Racial Differences Between Patient and Therapist Affect Therapeutic Alliance and Treatment Retention in Adolescents?

Parents, referral sources, and even therapists wonder whether the gender and racial match between therapists and patients contributes to poorer alliances and treatment dropout. Six hundred adolescent substance abusers and their therapists from a large randomized clinical trial were grouped according to matches and mismatches on both gender and race, and alliance ratings were collected from both patients and therapists. Results revealed that gender-matched dyads reported higher alliances and were more likely to complete treatment. Racial matching predicted greater retention but not patient-rated alliance. However, therapists in mismatched dyads rated significantly lower alliances. Results suggest that, although multicultural training remains critical, training emphasis should also be placed on understanding how gender and racial differences affect therapeutic processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Patient interpersonal impacts and the early therapeutic alliance in interpersonal therapy for depression.

The therapeutic alliance consistently predicts positive psychotherapy outcomes. Thus, it is important to uncover factors that relate to alliance development. The goal of this study was to examine the association between patient interpersonal characteristics and alliance quality in interpersonal therapy for depression. Data derive from a subsample (n = 74) of a larger naturalistic database of outpatients treated at a mood disorders clinic of a university-affiliated psychiatric hospital. Following Session 3 of treatment, therapists completed the Impact Message Inventory (Kiesler & Schmidt, 1993) to assess patients' interpersonal impacts on them. Also following Session 3, patients completed the Working Alliance Inventory (Horvath & Greenberg, 1989) to assess alliance quality. As predicted, patients' affiliative interpersonal impacts, as perceived by their therapists, were positively associated with alliance quality, controlling for baseline depression severity. Although unrelated to the initial hypotheses, patients concurrently taking psychotropic medications reported better alliances than patients receiving psychotherapy only. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Interpersonal complementarity and the therapeutic alliance: A study of relationship in psychotherapy.

Examined the relationship between the therapeutic alliance and interpersonal complementarity during the early stage of psychotherapy. 36 pairs of patients (aged 18–57 yrs) and therapists from 14 outpatient settings recorded their perceptions of their therapeutic alliance, using a working alliance inventory, and rated each other's therapy behaviors on the Checklist of Interpersonal Transactions. There were positive associations between patient–therapist interpersonal complementarity and both patients' and therapists' perceptions of the alliance. The more extreme/abnormal the patient's interpersonal behavior, the more both patient and therapist perceived a less positive working alliance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Therapist Alliance-Building Behavior Within a Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Anxiety in Youth.

Explored the specific behavior of therapists contributing to a child client's perception of a therapeutic alliance with youth (n = 56) who received a manualized cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders. The first 3 sessions were coded for 11 therapist behaviors hypothesized to predict ratings of alliance. Child, therapist, and observer alliance ratings were gathered after the 3rd and 7th therapy sessions. "Collaboration" positively predicted early child ratings of alliance, and "finding common ground" and "pushing the child to talk" negatively predicted early child ratings of alliance. Although no coded therapist behaviors predicted early therapist ratings of alliance, "collaboration" and "not being overly formal" positively predicted therapist alliance ratings by Session 7. Child, observer, and therapist ratings of alliance were significantly correlated. Results are discussed with regard to the identified behavior of the therapist as a step toward the identification of empirically supported strategies for building a stronger child-therapist alliance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The role of the alliance and techniques in predicting outcome of supportive-expressive dynamic therapy for cocaine dependence.

We examine the complex relations among therapeutic alliance, adherence to Supportive-Expressive Therapy (SET), therapist competence, and their interactions in predicting change in drug use. Experts rated early therapy sessions of cocaine dependent patients (n = 108) randomized to SET as part of the Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Moderate adherence to SET and competent delivery of SET were separately associated with poorer outcome. Further, strong alliance combined with low levels of SET adherence was associated with a better outcome than moderate or high levels. Moreover, the usage of nonprescribed techniques (i.e., Individual Drug Counseling [IDC]) by SET therapists predicted better outcome in a subsample (n = 36), and SET patients receiving high levels of IDC adherence had less predicted drug use compared with those with high levels of SET techniques. Overall results may suggest that decreasing cocaine use through straightforward drug counseling techniques instead of trying to help patients understand the reasons for their use is a better initial road to recovery. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Therapeutic Alliance in Depression Treatment: Controlling for Prior Change and Patient Characteristics.

Although many studies report that the therapeutic alliance predicts psychotherapy outcome, few exclude the possibility that this association is accounted for by 3rd variables, such as prior improvement and prognostically relevant patient characteristics. The authors treated 367 chronically depressed patients with the cognitive-behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP), alone or with medication. Using mixed effects growth-curve analyses, they found the early alliance significantly predicted subsequent improvement in depressive symptoms after controlling for prior improvement and 8 prognostically relevant patient characteristics. In contrast, neither early level nor change in symptoms predicted the subsequent level or course of the alliance. Patients receiving combination treatment reported stronger alliances with their psychotherapists than patients receiving CBASP alone. However, the impact of the alliance on outcome was similar for both treatment conditions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The therapeutic alliance in adolescent substance abuse treatment: A one-with-many analysis.

Studies of the therapeutic alliance typically use a one-with-many (OWM) design in which each therapist (the one) treats multiple clients (the many). This study used Kenny, Kashy, and Cook's (2006) OWM method to examine the composition of the therapeutic alliance and to analyze the association between alliance and outcome in a sample of 398 adolescents treated for substance abuse by 14 therapists. Both the client and therapist alliance ratings yielded large relationship variances, with limited consensus among clients treated by the same therapist about the quality of the alliance. If a client reported an especially strong alliance with his or her therapist, the therapist was likely to also report an especially strong alliance with that client (dyadic reciprocity). The association between the components of the alliance and treatment outcome was complicated, with different levels of measurement and different components of the alliance (perceiver, partner, or relationship) derived from different informants (therapist or client) relating to different outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

The therapeutic alliance in psychodynamic psychotherapy: Theoretical conceptualizations and research findings.

The construct of the therapeutic alliance is approached from the psychoanalytic tradition by reference to the ideas of Freud, R. Sterba, E. R. Zetzel, R. R. Greenson, and L. Luborsky. The transtheoretical approaches posited by E. S. Bordin and L. Gaston are also presented and the relation of alliance to the transference is discussed. The empirical evidence as to the role of the alliance in psychodynamically oriented psychotherapy is presented, and the construct is operationally defined by means of the major psychometric instruments. Factors that foster the development of strong alliances (patient and therapist factors), as well as those that hinder or result in its rupture are discussed in detail. The differential association of alliance to outcome depending on who measures the alliance (patient, therapist, or independent observer) and the timing of the measurement of the alliance (first, third, fifth, or later session) are considered. Last, there is a discussion of the criticisms of how research in this area is conducted, and suggestions for future researchers are made. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Commentary on Dinger et al.: Therapist’s attachment, interpersonal problems and alliance development over time in inpatient psychotherapy.

This short article is a commentary on a research study investigating therapist and client attachment styles and their relationship to alliance development in a 12-week psychodynamic psychotherapy program for nonpsychotic inpatients. The relationship is complex; unsurprisingly, securely attached therapists with less distressed clients formed the strongest alliances. A significant proportion of therapists were insecure, almost entirely in the preoccupied or hyperactivating mode. It is argued that collusive relationships between such therapists and similarly overaroused clients may be common. Therapists need both to accommodate to their client’s attachment style and to confound it if positive change is to result. Therapist self-scrutiny is likely to be a precondition for such positive outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The alliance in couple therapy: Partner influence, early change, and alliance patterns in a naturalistic sample.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the alliance and outcome in couple therapy and examine whether the alliance predicted outcomes over and above early change. The authors also investigated partner influence and gender and sought to identify couple alliance patterns that predicted couple outcomes. Method: The authors examined the alliances and outcomes at posttreatment and follow-up of 250 couples seeking treatment for marital distress in a naturalistic setting. The Session Rating Scale was used to measure the alliance; the Outcome Rating Scale and Locke Wallace Marital Adjustment Scale were used to measure outcomes. Couples were White, Euro-Scandinavian, and heterosexual, with a mean age of 38.5 years and average number of years together of 11.8. On a subsample (n = 118) that included couples with 4 or more sessions, the authors investigated the relationship between the alliance and outcome controlling for early change, and patterns of alliance development were delineated. Results: In the full sample, first-session alliances were not predictive of outcomes, but last-session alliances were predictive for both individuals and their partners. In the subsample, third-session alliances predicted outcome significantly above early change (d = 0.25) that exceeded the reliable change index. Couple alliances that started over the mean and increased were associated with significantly more couples achieving reliable or clinically significant change. Gender influences were mixed. Conclusions: Given the current findings suggesting a potential alliance impact over and above symptom relief as well as the importance of ascending alliance scores, continuous assessment of the alliance appears warranted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Systematic effects of participant role on evaluation of the psychotherapy session.

This study identified systematic differences between therapists (n?=?114) and patients (n?=?119) in the process components that predict evaluation of psychotherapy sessions. The Comprehensive Scale of Psychotherapy Session Constructs was developed to measure 9 process variables and their relationships to session evaluation from the perspectives of therapist and patient. Regression equations predicting session evaluation from the process components for the 2 groups were significantly different. Therapist session evaluation was best predicted by therapist expertness, and patient session evaluation was best predicted by the therapist real relationship. The therapist real relationship negatively predicted therapist session evaluation when all process variables were considered simultaneously. Patient progress and patient involvement significantly and positively predicted both therapist and patient evaluation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Alliance-building interventions with adolescents in family therapy: A process study.

Identified, articulated, and measured therapist behaviors associated with improving initially poor therapist–adolescent alliances in multidimensional family therapy (MDFT). A list of preliminary alliance-building interventions was generated from MDFT theory and adolescent development research. This list was then refined through the observation of videotaped MDFT sessions. A sample of 5 improved and 5 unimproved alliance cases was then drawn from a larger treatment study. Ss (mean age 15 yrs) were primarily African American, male, adolescent substance abusers and their families. Coders rated the 1st 3 sessions of each case (30 sessions) to determine the extent to which each alliance-building intervention was employed. Measures of alliance features included the Vanderbilt Alliance Scale (D. E. Hartley and H. H. Strupp, 1983), the Alliance Building Behavior Scale (G. M. Diamond, et al, 1996), and the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents (S. Harter, 1988). By session 3, therapists were attending to the adolescent's experience, formulating personally meaningful goals, and presenting as the adolescent's ally more extensively in the improved alliance cases than in the unimproved alliance cases. Using these data, proposed stages of alliance building with adolescents are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Adolescent and Parent Alliance and Treatment Outcome in Multidimensional Family Therapy.

In this study, the authors examined the relation between adolescent and parent therapeutic alliances and treatment outcome among 65 substance-abusing adolescents receiving multidimensional family therapy. Observer ratings of parent alliance predicted premature termination from treatment. Observer ratings, but not self-report, of adolescent alliance predicted adolescents' substance abuse and dependency symptoms at posttreatment, as well as days of cannabis use at 3-month follow-up. The association between adolescent alliance and substance abuse and dependency symptoms at posttreatment was moderated by the strength of the parent alliance. Results reveal the unique and interactive effects of the 2 alliances on treatment outcome and emphasize the need for a systemic and well-articulated approach to developing and maintaining the multiple alliances inherent to family therapy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Patient-therapist matching for prediction of optimal and minimal therapeutic outcome

Exp I (a) established outcome criteria using evaluation ratings from 24 patient-therapist dyads; (b) produced 11 quantifiable personality predictors through factor analysis of 18 therapists' and 65 patients' scores on a test battery (including the MMPI and the Omnibus Personality Inventory); (c) identified 3 typological categories of both patients and therapists homogeneous with respect to these variables and 2 groups of therapists each homogeneous with respect to therapeutic approach; and (d) derived 5 regression equations predicting outcome for each patient and therapist group. Exp II, with 24 therapists and 56 patients who were university students or their spouses, utilized these findings to form 2 experimental dyad groups for which (a) optimal or (b) minimal therapist outcome ratings were predicted, and 2 control groups each for both optimal and deterioration matches that controlled for patient type and therapist type, respectively. Results indicate significant differences between mean outcome in the comparison of the deterioration-matched group both with its control and the optimally matched group. Findings demonstrate the usefulness of carefully planned matching techniques. (18 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)