Speech perception performance in experienced cochlear-implant patients receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant

Sixteen experienced cochlear implant patients with a wide range of speech-perception abilities received the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant. Speech perception was assessed in quiet and in noise with SPEAK and with the patients' previous strategies (for most, Multipeak) at the study onset, as well as after using SPEAK for 6 months. Comparisons were made within and across the two test sessions to elucidate possible learning effects. Patients were also asked to rate the strategies on seven speech recognition and sound quality scales. After 6 months' experience with SPEAK, patients showed significantly improved mean performance on a range of speech recognition measures in quiet and noise. When mean subjective ratings were compared over time there were no significant differences noted between strategies. However, many individuals rated the SPEAK strategy better for two or more of the seven subjective measures. Ratings for "appreciation of music" and "quality of my own voice" in particular were generally higher for SPEAK. Improvements were realized by patients with a wide range of speech perception abilities, including those with little or no open-set speech recognition.     

Integrin associated proteins

The Clarion cochlear implant was developed in the USA and received FDA approval in August 1996. It consists of an implantable cochlear stimulator (ICS), speech processor with headpiece, and in addition, a clinician's programming system and portable cochlear implant tester. One of the features of the device is its stimulation-coding process for which two methods of continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) and compressed analogue (CA) are applicable. Regardless of which is used, stimulation can be provided over 8 channels. The device was used in 2 cases. Both patients were operated on in October 1996, and 16 electrodes in 8 pairs were mounted in the cochlea. Mapping, performed 3 weeks after the operation, showed good speech perception in both patients with only a cochlear implant in the "open-set" status. CIS was used as the stimulation-coding method. CA has yet to be applied.     

Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative performance of 12 children who demonstrated some open-set speech recognition skills before receiving a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant with a view toward expanding the selection criteria for cochlear implant candidacy to include children who derive minimal benefit from amplification. DESIGN: Pre- and postoperative performance of two groups of children were compared. Group 1 consisted of 12 children who demonstrated some open-set speech recognition skills before receiving a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant (Borderline group). Group 2 consisted of 12 children who demonstrated no open-set speech recognition skills before implantation with a Nucleus device (Traditional group). In all children, candidacy was determined based on preimplant binaural aided performance. For most subjects, the poorer ear was selected for implantation. Mean pre- and postoperative speech recognition scores of the Borderline subjects were compared to determine the benefit provided by their cochlear implants. Secondly, matched-pair analyses were used to compare the mean speech recognition scores obtained by the Borderline and Traditional subjects. RESULTS: The scores of the Borderline group improved significantly on five of six speech recognition measures when 6 mo postoperative scores obtained with the implant were compared with preoperative test scores obtained with hearing aids. By the 12 mo postoperative interval, the scores of the Borderline group had improved significantly (p < 0.05) on all six measures. In contrast, scores obtained by the Traditional group had improved significantly on three of six measures at both the 6 and 12 mo postoperative intervals. Comparison of postoperative test scores revealed that the Borderline group scored significantly higher than the Traditional group on three of six measures at the 6 mo test interval and on six of six measures at the 12 mo test interval (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that both groups derive significant benefit from their cochlear implants. Although the mean preoperative audiograms for the implanted ears did not differ significantly for the two groups of subjects, members of the Borderline group exhibited significantly better speech recognition skills than the Traditional group during the first year after implantation. These findings suggest that the increased auditory experience of the Borderline subjects positively influenced their performance with a cochlear implant. The authors advocate that the selection criteria used to determine pediatric cochlear implant candidacy be broadened to include consideration of children who demonstrate minimal open-set speech recognition skills.     

Improvements in speech perception by children with profound prelingual hearing loss: effects of device, communication mode, and chronological age

The present investigation expanded on an earlier study by Miyamoto, Osberger, Todd, Robbins, Karasek, et al. (1994) who compared the speech perception skills of two groups of children with profound prelingual hearing loss. The first group had received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant and was tested longitudinally. The second group, who were not implanted and used conventional hearing aids, was tested at a single point in time. In the present study, speech perception scores were examined over time for both groups of children as a function of communication mode of the child. Separate linear regressions of speech perception scores as a function of age were computed to estimate the rate of improvement in speech perception abilities that might be expected due to maturation for the hearing aid users (n=58) within each communication mode. The resulting regression lines were used to compare the estimated rate of speech perception growth for each hearing aid group to the observed gains in speech perception made by the children with multichannel cochlear implants. A large number of children using cochlear implants (n=74) were tested over a long period of implant use (m=3.5 years) that ranged from zero to 8.5 years. In general, speech perception scores for the children using cochlear implants were higher than those predicted for a group of children with 101-110 dB HL of hearing loss using hearing aids, and they approached the scores predicted for a group of children with 90-100 dB HL of hearing loss using hearing aids.     

A new quadruple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Effect of pretreatment with omeprazole on the cure rate

The aim of the study was to assess the speech discrimination ability of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant and to compare the results with the postoperative data published for other devices. The postoperative open and closed set speech perception performance of 21 consecutive patients was tested using a standardized test battery comprising a number, monosyllable, sentence, consonant and vowel discrimination test as well as a rhyme test in the sound only condition. Mean values achieved for each test 1, 6 and 12 months after "switch on" were evaluated. The results demonstrate that all patients have a substantial benefit from their implant and show a continuous improvement in their speech perception abilities with increased device experience. The mean percentages of correct answers after 12 months were 93.4 for numbers, 44.6 for monosyllables, 78.5 for sentences, 67.6 for the rhyme test, 59.8 for vowel, and 67.3 for consonant discrimination. Preoperatively, the mean discrimination score for monosyllables was 0%. The speech discrimination scores of our patients were similar or higher than described for similar patient groups implanted with other devices. The high stimulation rate of the implant system using the continuous interleaved speech processing strategy as well as a deep atraumatic electrode insertion into the apicalmost regions of the scala tympani may be the reason for good performance.     

Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing

Current multichannel cochlear implant devices provide high levels of speech performance in quiet. However, performance deteriorates rapidly with increasing levels of background noise. The goal of this study was to investigate whether the noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users is primarily due to the loss of fine spectral information. Recognition of vowels and consonants was measured as a function of signal-to-noise ratio in four normal-hearing listeners in conditions simulating cochlear implants with both CIS and SPEAK-like strategies. Six conditions were evaluated: 3-, 4-, 8-, and 16-band processors (CIS-like), a 6/20 band processor (SPEAK-like), and unprocessed speech. Recognition scores for vowels and consonants decreased as the S/N level worsened in all conditions, as expected. Phoneme recognition threshold (PRT) was defined as the S/N at which the recognition score fell to 50% of its level in quiet. The unprocessed speech had the best PRT, which worsened as the number of bands decreased. Recognition of vowels and consonants was further measured in three Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users using either their normal SPEAK speech processor or a custom processor with a four-channel CIS strategy. The best cochlear implant user showed similar performance with the CIS strategy in quiet and in noise to that of normal-hearing listeners when listening to correspondingly spectrally degraded speech. These findings suggest that the noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users is at least partly due to the loss of spectral resolution. Efforts to improve the effective number of spectral information channels should improve implant performance in noise.     

Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations

We performed a case study and intervention study, with follow-up of 1 to 5 years, in 4 children with inner ear malformations who underwent implantation of a multichannel cochlear implant (Nucleus, Cochlear Corporation) at ages 3 to 12 years. Malformations included a common cavity deformity, 2 incomplete partitions, and 1 case of isolated bilateral vestibular aqueduct enlargement. One child had a single-channel implant placed at 3 years of age, and this was exchanged for a 22-channel implant at age 9. One child had her implant placed at age 4.5 years, but due to complications from a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak had the initial implant removed and replaced at age 5 years during repair of the CSF leak. Intraoperative findings included a CSF leak at the time of surgery in 3 patients. One patient contracted bacterial meningitis 7 months postimplantation that was thought to be secondary to acute otitis media in the unoperated ear. Bilateral CSF leaks were noted in the middle ear by a lumbar puncture radionuclide and fluorescein dye study. Successful repair of the CSF leaks and reimplantation of the cochlear implant was carried out in this patient. Mapping and programming of the implant was found to be challenging in each of these patients. All patients demonstrated improved performance after implantation. Two patients demonstrated some open-set speech perception. One patient demonstrates improved use of temporal cues in a structured closed set. One patient has achieved no significant speech recognition at this time, but does have improved sound detection and awareness. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital inner ear abnormalities can be a successful method of rehabilitation. It should be recognized that the postoperative speech perception results may be highly variable among patients, and that intraoperative complications may occur.     

Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of cochlear implant patients and normal-hearing subjects on a musical interval labeling task, and to determine whether information regarding musical interval size is available to cochlear implant patients under realistic everyday listening conditions. DESIGN: Two Nucleus cochlear implant patients listened to musical intervals that consisted of systematic variations of electric pulse rate on single bipolar intracochlear electrode pairs, whereas normal-hearing listeners were presented with the acoustical analog of these stimuli. Subjects labeled the intonation quality of the stimulus intervals ("flat," "sharp," or "in tune"), relative to their memory for specific intervals abstracted from familiar melodies. The cochlear implant patients, in addition, performed this task with realistic acoustical musical stimuli. RESULTS: The interval labeling behavior of cochlear implant subjects, at low pulse rates, was similar to that of normal-hearing subjects. Furthermore, pitch interval information does not appear to be available to cochlear implant subjects when they are listening to acoustical stimuli via their speech processors. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal information appears to be sufficient for the perception of musical pitch. Encoding strategies that are highly successful in restoring speech understanding do not necessarily provide information regarding melodic pitch interval size.     

Predictive factors for speech perception in patients with cochlear implant

Cochlear implant therapy is an epoch-making advance in artificial sensory organ transplants, but the positive effects on speech perception vary. Quantification theory type I, a multivariate analysis, was used to determine predictive factors for speech perception in patients with cochlear implants. Fifty-one postlingual deaf adults (18 male and 33 female, mean age, 53.4, mean duration of deafness, 8.6 years) were tested for speech perception three or more months after a Nucleus 22 channels cochlear implant. The cause of deafness in nine patients was labyrinthitis, ototoxicity in five, meningitis in three and unknown in the remaining 34. Speech perception was measured by vowel, consonant and word recognition using a live voice, and monosyllable, word and sentence recognition using a videodisc. All tests were administered in a sound only condition. Results of the univariate analysis indicated that age at implantation was correlated with monosyllable recognition, and duration of deafness was correlated with live voice word recognition. Residual hearing and coding strategy were both correlated with all outcome measures. The multivariate analysis revealed that coding strategy, duration of deafness, residual hearing and the number of electrodes were significant predictors of live voice word recognition in that order.     

Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients

The cognitive P300 evoked potential was elicited by speech stimuli in successful cochlear implant recipients, and the resulting P300 morphology was remarkably similar to that of normal-hearing individuals. The P300 was elicited by the synthesized speech pair/da/and/di/ presented using an oddball paradigm to nine "good" Nucleus cochlear implant users and nine age-matched normal-hearing subjects (34-81 yr old). There were no significant differences in P300 amplitude and latency between the two groups. Moreover, the N1 and P2 potentials occurred at similar latencies in the two groups, although the N1 amplitude was significantly smaller in the cochlear implant users. The P300 was absent in one "poor" cochlear implant user. The results suggest that the P300 may serve as a useful tool for evaluating the cognitive aspects of auditory processing in cochlear implant recipients, and that it may aid in assessing the success of cochlear implantation.     

Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners

Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were obtained for different azimuths of up to three interfering sound sources in a simulated ("virtual") spatial arrangement. For the SRT measurements a fast subjective threshold assessment method was used. The reduction in SRT relative to the reference threshold caused by spatial separation of target and interference signal is called the intelligibility level difference (ILD). For normal listeners, the maximum ILD was achieved at 105 degrees or 255 degrees azimuth of a single noise source when the target emanated from the front (0 degree azimuth). The ILD decreased rapidly if the number of interfering signals was increased and if they were located on opposite sides of the head. When using continuous speech as interference, this decrease of ILD was less pronounced. These findings indicate that the binaural system can suppress interference from only one azimuthal region at a time and can utilize temporal pauses in the interference to suppress a second interference from a different direction. For eight sensorineural impaired listeners, the maximum attainable ILD for one interfering noise source was reduced in a way not predictable from the audiogram. The ability to exploit pauses in the signal of an interfering talker was also reduced. Hence, hearing-impaired listeners are handicapped in realistic spatial interference situations both by an increased monaural SRT and a reduced binaural noise reduction ability.     

Aided speech recognition abilities of adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing loss

Adults with severe or severe-to-profound hearing losses constitute between 11% and 13.5% of the hearing-impaired population. A detailed investigation of the speech recognition of adults with severe (n = 20) or severe-to-profound (n = 14) hearing loss was conducted at The University of Melbourne. Each participant took part in a series of speech recognition tasks while wearing his or her currently fitted hearing aid(s). The assessments included closed-set tests of consonant recognition and vowel recognition, combined with open-set tests of monosyllabic word recognition and sentence recognition. Sentences were presented in quiet and in noise at +10 dB SNR to replicate an environment more typical of everyday listening conditions. Although the results demonstrated wide variability in performance, some general trends were observed. As expected vowels were generally well perceived compared with consonants. Monosyllabic word recognition scores for both the adults with a severe hearing impairment (M = 67.2%) and the adults with a severe-to-profound hearing impairment (M = 38.6%) could be predicted from the segmental tests, with an allowance for lexical effects. Scores for sentences presented in quiet showed additional linguistic effects and a significant decrease in performance with the addition of background noise (from 82.9% to 74.1% for adults with a severe hearing loss and from 55.8% to 34.2% for adults with a severe-to-profound hearing loss). Comparisons were made between the participants and a group of adults using a multiple-channel cochlear implant. This comparison indicated that some adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing loss may benefit from the use of a cochlear implant. The results of this study support the contention that cochlear implant candidacy should not rely solely on audiometric thresholds.     

Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates

Some cochlear implant patients achieve better speech recognition with pulsatile electrical stimulation presented at high rates. The present study aimed to explore, in an animal model of cochlear implants, how the excitability of the cochlear nerve is affected by pulsatile electrical stimulation delivered at high rates, of up to 1,000-2,000 pulses per second (pps). Adult rats (n=23) were implanted with two or three stimulating electrodes in the left cochlea. In four of these rats, the left cochlea was deafened by local perfusion with 1 per cent or 4 per cent neomycin solutions prior to implantation. Pulsatile stimuli consisted of 20 micros electrical pulses, delivered in trains of 200 ms duration, separated by a pause of 200 ms. The pulse rates ranged from 100 to 2,000 pps (intra-train pulse rate). Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) of the cochlear nerve were recorded either intracochlearly or from epidural electrodes (extra-cochlearly). With increasing pulse rates, the average ECAP amplitude decreased, whereas the average ECAP latency and its variability (SD) increased. For rates above 300 pps, the amplitude of the ECAP to the individual successive pulses delivered in the train progressively decreased during the initial part of the train, corresponding to a short-term adaptation of the cochlear nerve. This effect progressively increased for pulse rates ranging from 300 to 2,000 pps. In addition, there was a phenomenon of long-term adaptation, as indicated by a decrease in the amplitude of the ECAP to the first pulse of the train, indicating that the pause of 200 ms between each train was not long enough for full recovery of the cochlear nerve. This long-term adaptation was progressively more pronounced for increasing pulse rates. To characterize further the recovery in excitability of the cochlear nerve, forward masking experiments were conducted, showing a decrease of the ECAP amplitude when the interval between the first pulse (masker) and the second pulse (probe) was shorter than 2 ms. This ECAP decrease was slow for intervals between 2 and 1 ms and then abrupt for shorter intervals. The observations described above were similar for extra- and intra-cochlear recordings and were little, if at all, affected by treatment of the cochlea with neomycin.     

Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners

It is widely assumed that the proper transformation of acoustic amplitude to electric amplitude is a critical factor affecting speech recognition in cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. A four-channel noise-band speech processor was implemented, reducing spectral information to four bands. A power-law transformation was applied to the amplitude mapping stage in the speech processor design, and the exponent of the power function varied from a strongly compressive (p = 0.05) to a weakly compressive (p = 0.75) for implant listeners and from 0.3 to 3.0 for acoustic listeners. Results for implants showed that the best performance was achieved with an exponent of about 0.2, and performance gradually deteriorated when either more compressive or less compressive exponents were applied. The loudness growth functions of the four activated electrodes in each subject were measured and those data were well fit by a power function with a mean exponent of 2.72. The results indicated that the best performance was achieved when the normal loudness growth was restored. For acoustic listeners, results were similar to those observed with cochlear implant listeners, except that best performance was achieved with no amplitude nonlinearity (p = 1.0). The similarity of results in both acoustic and electric stimulation indicated that the performance deterioration observed for extreme nonlinearity was due to similar perceptual effects. The function relating amplitude mapping exponent and performance was relatively flat, indicating that phoneme recognition was only mildly affected by amplitude nonlinearity.     

Premorbid educational attainment in schizophrenia: association with symptoms, functioning, and neurobehavioral measures

The current adjustment of cochlear implant (CI) speech processors is based on a knowledge of the lower and upper limits (T- and C-levels) for electrical stimulus currents. These data are usually acquired from subjective classifications of individual patients. In cases with non-reliable patient responses, objective methods are necessary. Especially for the estimation of correct T-levels, auditory evoked potentials (AEP) can be applied, since they allow the determination of response thresholds in a frequency-specific manner. By determining the AEP of different latencies, late cortical responses can be registered almost without artifact contamination. These patients have been examined in 20 patients provided with 22- or 8-channel CI-systems (Nucleus or Med-EI implants). In all cases, clear responses and clearly discernible threshold transitions could be detected. By making use of acoustical stimulation in a free sound field, subjective hearing threshold and the T-levels of electrical stimulation could be verified. Since late responses are generated in the primary auditory cortex, their assessment permits a nearly integral functional control of the aided hearing system. To date, no problems have occurred from maturation or attentional effects in either pediatric or adult patients. The applicability in very young children remains to be explored.     

Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: This study compares auditory performance between original and replacement cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data from 18 U.S. cochlear implant programs were obtained by retrospective chart review. Patients received and returned subjective questionnaires. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight adults with once-functioning Nucleus 22 cochlear implants that failed received replacement Nucleus 22 cochlear implants in the same ears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective measures included sentence (CID Everyday Sentences or Iowa Sentences) and monosyllabic word (NU-6 Words or CNC Words) speech discrimination scores. Patients also rated and compared performance using subjective scales. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of patients had significantly higher sentence or word scores with their replacement cochlear implants than with their original implants, 26% had no significant change, and 37% had significantly poorer scores. Subjectively, 57% of patients reported that the performance of their replacement device was better or the same and 43% reported that it was poorer. There was no correlation between performance with the replacement cochlear implant and cause of the original device failure, duration of original device use before failure, surgical complications with either implantation, changes in electrode insertion depths, or preoperative variables, such as age, etiology, or duration of deafness. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition ability with a replacement cochlear implant may significantly increase or decrease from that with the original implant. Experienced cochlear implant patients facing reimplantation must be counseled regarding the possibility of differences in sound quality and speech recognition performance with their replacement device.     

First field trials with a portable CIS processor for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant

The continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy is a promising sound processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants which provides immediate improvements in speech recognition when tested on Ineraid users: patients with only a few hours of experience (in laboratory testing) with the CIS strategy score better than with the Ineraid prosthesis they used since they, were implanted. The goal of this study was to evaluate the benefits that can be gained by the use of the new strategy in every day life. Two patients, implanted with the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant, were equipped with a portable numerical processor programmed to implement a high rate CIS strategy. Their speech recognition was evaluated periodically with consonant and vowel identification tests for more than 6 months of use. Tests were also made with the Ineraid processor during the same experimental sessions and patients were regularly interviewed about their experience. Performance with the portable CIS processor was superior or equal to that obtained previously in the laboratory with the same strategy. Both patients achieved the best scores in 6 years of cochlear implant use. Qualitative reports from the patients suggest that the CIS strategy can improve "hearing" performance of cochlear implant users in many important situations of every day life. Altogether, these results hold great promises for all users of the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.     

Asynchronous sequential stimulation. A new signal treatment for cochlear implants

Cochlear implants use a fixed or FO dependent stimulation rate, whatever the sound analysed (vowel or consonant) and its analysis procedure (fixed filters or FFT). We present a procedure which varies as a function of the nature of the input signal. This method is based on FFT analysis using a variable with analysis window. Short windows are applied on the transient part of the signal, providing poor frequency resolution but good time resolution; they accurately permit to follow the speech signal in time during its fast temporal variations. Large windows are applied on the stationary parts of the signal, providing better frequency resolution, but poor time resolution. Transient parts of the speech order this window switching; they are detected using the statistical properties of the FFT; moreover the narrow windowing is coupled with an increase of the stimulation frequency. This strategy has been implemented using the Digisonic cochlear implant software, and clinically assessed on 6 regular cochlear implant users, owing to a consonant-vowel-consonant test. This Asynchronous-Interleaved-Stimulation (AIS) strategy provides the patients with better discrimination than fixed window FFT analysis. The coding protocol are described and results presented.     

Loudness balance between acoustic and electric stimulation by a patient with a multichannel cochlear implant

Estimates of loudness balance were obtained for acoustically and electrically presented 250 Hz sine signals from a patient who uses the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Acoustic and electric loudness matching was possible because the patient evidenced a 25 dB HL threshold at 250 Hz in his nonimplanted ear. The level of the electrical stimulus in microamperes required for a balance of loudness grew linearly with equal increments in decibels for the acoustic stimulus. These data, in concert with the very limited data from previous studies, provide a rationale for using a logarithmic transformation of acoustic to electric intensity in signal processors for cochlear implants.