Effect of adhesive systems on microleakage in endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts

The effect of adhesive systems on microleakage in endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts was studied. Forty carious and crack-free premolars were prepared using a stepback technique and obturated with gutta-percha. The endodontically treated roots were randomly divided into four groups (n?=?10). Glass fiber posts cemented following adhesive luting agents; group 1: All Bond 3/Duo Link (ALB/DL), group 2: One-Step Plus/Duo-Link (OSP/DL), group 3: Panavia F 2.0/Panavia ED Primer II (PAN/ED), and group 4: Rely X Unicem (RU). All specimens were thermal cycled and stored in basic fuchsin solution for one week. The roots were sectioned horizontally into three sections: apical, middle, and coronal. The occlusal direction of each section was digitally photographed under a stereomicroscope. Dye penetration area was calculated as the basic fuchsin infiltrated surface divided by total dentin. The data were statistically analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Tests (α?=?0.05). The mean area measurements were ranged between 0 and 3.7357. According to the Mann–Whitney U test, there was no significant difference among the groups and sections (p?>?0.05). Intragroup comparisons showed a significant difference between coronal-apical and middle-coronal sections in Panavia group (p?=?0.043) by Wilcoxon Signed Test. It was found that there was no significant difference among four groups and the apical, coronal, and middle sections. The only difference was found for the group of PAN/ED between coronal-apical and coronal-middle sections.     

Effects of simulated pulpal pressure,mechanical and thermocycling challenge on the microtensile bond strength of resin luting cements

This study aimed at comparing the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of three simplified luting strategies after different aging processes. Sixty human molars were prepared to expose flat middle dentin surfaces which received the following luting procedures: (i) SB+ARC – two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive+conventional resin cement (Adper Singlebond 2+RelyX ARC, 3M-ESPE); (ii) S3+PAN – one-step self-etch adhesive+conventional resin cement (Clearfil S3+Panavia F2.0, Kuraray Medical); (iii) U200 – self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200,3M-ESPE). The specimens were finally restored by indirect resin composite procedures (Filtek Z100,3M-ESPE). The aging regimens were water storage at 37 °C for one week (control), one week of 20 cm H₂O simulated pulpal pressure (SPP), 200,000 mechanical loading (ML) cycles, or 5000 thermal cycles (TC). The µTBS data was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). SB+ARC showed significantly higher µTBS for control and all aging processes (p<0.001). Nevertheless, TC had no effect on the bond strength of SB+ARC. No difference in µTBS was observed between S3+PAN and U200 after SPP (p=0.251), but significant lower values were found for U200 after ML (p=0.010) besides being superior in the control groups (p<0.001). For U200, all ageing regimens induced significant reductions in the bond strength (p<0.001) with a more pronounced negative effect after ML. S3+PAN showed significant lower bond strength (p=0.010) only after ML aging. Two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive associated with dual-curing conventional resin cement may present the highest overall µTBS. However, the use of S3 one-step self-etch adhesive along with conventional resin cements may provide the most stable luting performance under the tested aging strategy.     

Impact of conditioning regimens and time on adhesion of a fiber post to root dentin using two resin cements

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of irrigation protocols on the bond strength of a glass fiber post bonded to dentin using two resin cements. In 200 root-filled teeth, post space was prepared and divided into five groups (n?=?40) based on the irrigation protocol: group 1 (3% sodium hypochlorite), group 2 (3% sodium hypochlorite – 17% Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid), group 3 (a mixture of sodium hypochlorite and etidronic acid), group 4 (sodium hypochlorite – QMix), and group 5 (distilled water). Samples were subdivided into two subgroups (n?= 10) and fiber posts were cemented using subgroup A (Self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; SEA) or B (dual-cure resin cement following an etch-and-rinse protocol, ER). Push-out bond strength was performed after 24 h and four months (n?= 10) and failure modes were categorized. Statistical analysis of data was carried out by appropriate analyses (p < 0.05). The irrigation protocol and the resin cement had a significant impact on push-out bond strength. Subgroup A group showed lower bond strength than B at both time periods when 3% NaOCl–17% EDTA and 1:1 mixture of 6% NaOCl + 18%EA protocols were used. Three percent NaOCl used in combination with 17% EDTA or QMix significantly decreased the push-out bond strength of ER at the end of four months (p < 0.05). In conclusion, dual-cure resin cements bonded with etch-and-rinse protocol showed highest bond strength when a mixture of NaOCl and etidronic acid was used as root canal irrigant. These values were differentially influenced by time.     

Effect of desensitizers on the microleakage of previously restored Class V resin composite restorations

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different desensitizers’ application on the microleakage of previously restored Class V composite resin restorations.

Materials and methods: Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 40 extracted human third molars. Forty box-shaped cavities were divided into four groups, based on the desensitizers used (n = 10). All teeth were restored with the same bonding agent and composite material. No desensitizer was applied in the control group. In the experimental groups, BisBlock, Gluma and Universal bonding agents were the desensitizers. The desensitizers were applied after completion of composite restorations according to manufacturers’ instructions. All specimens were then thermocycled at 5–55 °C, with a 10-s dwell time for 500 cycles. The samples were then immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye for 24 h, sectioned into two equal halves, evaluated for microleakage using a stereomicroscope at 30× magnification and scored on a scale of 0–3. The data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test at the significance level p < 0.05.

Results: There were no significant differences in microleakage after desensitizer application (p > 0.05). However, based on the obtained numerical values in our study, while the BisBlock and bonding groups showed lower microleakage at the occlusal margin, BisBlock, Gluma and bonding group showed lower microleakage at the gingival margin compared to the control group.

Conclusions: The application of desensitizers as a post-treatment option could be considered an advisable procedure to minimize microleakage.     

The effect of canal cleansing protocols on cementation of a fiber post to saliva-contaminated root canals

Objective: This study investigated the effect of saliva contamination and cleansing effect of a self-etching primer (SEP), phosphoric acid (PA), chlorhexidine (CHX), and ethanol (EtOH) on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a fiber post cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement (SAC) to root canal dentin.

Material and methods: Sixty human lower premolar roots were randomly divided into 10 groups: (1) no saliva contamination, no cleansing (Control); (2) no saliva contamination, cleansing with SEP (NC-SEP); (3) no saliva contamination, cleansing with PA (NC-PA); (4) no saliva contamination, cleansing with CHX (NC-CHX); (5) no saliva contamination, cleansing with EtOH (NC-EtOH); (6) with saliva contamination, no cleansing (SC-NC); (7) with saliva contamination, cleansing with SEP (SC-SEP); (8) with saliva contamination, cleansing with PA (SC-PA); (9) with saliva contamination, cleansing with CHX (SC-CHX); (10) with saliva contamination, cleansing with EtOH (SC-EtOH). After cementation of posts, the roots were transversally sectioned to obtain six slices (n = 36) followed by μTBS test. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (p = 0.05).

Results: Saliva contamination and cleansing methods had a significant effect on μTBS values (p < 0.0001). All cleansing agents improved bond strengths when compared with Control and SC-NC. Cleansing with CHX and ethanol showed lower μTBS values than phosphoric acid and SEP, regardless of saliva contamination (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Saliva contamination negatively affected bonding performance of SAC to root dentin. However; SEP, PA, CHX and EtOH can be used on contaminated dentin surfaces to optimize bonding performance of self-adhesive cements.     

Mechanical properties of flared root canals restored with fiber post and chemically activated resin: study using push-out bond strength and fracture load tests

This study aimed to evaluate the fracture load and push-out bond strength of flared root canals restored with different procedures, including a technique with a fiber post and a chemically activated resin composite. Eighty human canines were selected and treated endodontically. Two methodologies were used: push-out and fracture load. The teeth were divided into four groups: Cast metal core (CMC); PAN (direct anatomic post); PAC (fiber post and accessory posts); and PE (fiber post with chemically activated resin composite). For the fracture load test, the samples were submitted to load application in a universal testing machine. The fracture mode was evaluated visually. Forty other samples were submitted to the push-out test. The fracture load (n = 10) and the bond strength (n = 10) were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey tests (α < 0.05). CMC presented the highest fracture load (p < 0.05), and no significant differences were observed in the fracture load values for Groups PAN, PAC, and PE. CMC presented 90% of unfavorable failures; PAN and PAC, the remaining 10% of these failures. PE presented only favorable failures. PAC presented lower push-out bond strength values. The fracture load for CMC procedure was higher than that of the others, but presented 90% unfavorable fractures, indicating the use of any of the glass fiber post techniques evaluated for restoring flared root canals due to favorable fracture modes.     

Shear bond strengths of six different porcelain laminate veneer materials cemented to enamel with two different MDP-containing resin cements

Purpose: To compare the shear bond strengths of six different porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) materials cemented to enamel with two different MDP-containing resin cements. Materials and methods: Totally 120 disc specimens were fabricated with In-Ceram alumina (ICA), Turkom-Cera^TM (TCR), IPS Empress (IPS), IPS Empress-II (IPS2), Finesse (FNS), and Ceramco-3 (CER) ceramic systems (n = 20). Sixty specimens were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (Clearfil SA), and 60 specimens were cemented with self-etch resin cement (Panavia F2.0) to enamel. Thus, 120 PLV–enamel specimens were assigned to 12 experimental groups (ICA/Pv, ICA/Cf, TCR/Pv, TCR/Cf, IPS/Pv, IPS/Cf, IPS2/Pv, IPS2/Cf, CER/Pv, CER/Cf). Shear force was applied on PLV–enamel interfaces until failure. Obtained data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and t-tests. Results: Obtained shear bond strength values (SBSV) ranged as follows, respectively; TCR/Cf (7.70 MPa), FNS/Cf (7.57 MPa), TCR/Pv (6.91 MPa), ICA/Pv (5.05 MPa), CER/Pv (4.75 MPa), IPS2/Cf (4.66 MPa), FNS/Pv (4.43 MPa), IPS2/Pv (3.97 MPa), CER/Cf (3.82 MPa), IPS/Pv (3.62 MPa), ICA/Cf (3.59 MPa), IPS/Cf (3.11 MPa). Highest SBSV were obtained in TCR groups (7.70 MPa for TCR/Cf and 6.91 MPa for TCR/Pv) and lowest SBSV were obtained in IPS groups (3.11 MPa for IPS/Cf and 3.62 MPa for IPS/Pv) in both resin cements. No significant bond strength difference was found between two resin cements. Conclusions: TCR groups showed highest SBSV; lowest SBSV were obtained with both IPS PLVs. The resin cement type did not significantly affect the bond strength value of a ceramic type, except for the Finesse system.     

Influence of glass fiber post translucency on microhardness and dentin bond strength of resin cement at different root levels

The aims of this study were (a) to evaluate the influence of glass fiber post translucency on the hardness of a light-cure resin cement within the root canal; (b) to assess dentin bond strength at different root levels. Fifty human canine roots were randomly divided into five groups. Translucent posts (Exacto, Angelus; White Post DC, FGM; FRC Postec Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent) were used in three groups, opaque posts (Exacto Opaco, Angelus) were used in one group and no posts were used in the last group. The posts were cemented using a light-cure resin cement (Variolink N Base, Ivoclar Vivadent). The roots were cross-sectioned into slices (two from the cervical, two from the middle, and two from the apical thirds) which were then submitted to microhardness and push-out tests. Two-way analysis of variance and Tukey test were performed. Cement microhardness was significantly higher in the translucent post groups when compared to opaque posts and no post. At the apical third, the White Post DC and FRC Postec groups showed higher microhardness values than those in the Exacto Translucido group. The type of glass fiber post did not significantly influence bond strength values. White Post DC and FRC Postec Plus provided higher resin cement microhardness values, especially at the most apical thirds. Bond strength was not dependent on the type of post used. Failure mode analysis suggested superior cement curing when the translucent posts were used.     

The influence of delayed light curing on the degree of conversion and polymerization contraction stress in dual-cured resin luting agents

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of delayed photo-initiation on the polymerization contraction stress (PCS) and degree of conversion (DC) of a dual-cure resin-luting agent. Thirty-five disk (6 mm × 1 mm) samples (n = 10 each group) of dual cure resin luting agent for PCS assessment were fabricated and polymerized using two illuminated quartz rods. Based on the delay in photo-initiation, 30 disks were divided among six groups [group A-0 min (min) delay, group B-2 min, group C-4 min, group D-6 min, group E-8 min and group F-10 min]. A non-photoinitiated group (group G – chemical cure – n = 5) was included as control. The PCS for all specimens was assessed using a Tensometer. For DC evaluation thirty-five specimens were divided into seven groups with delays in photo-initiation (group H-0 min, group I-2 min, group J-4 min, group K-6 min, group L-8 min and group M-10 min, group N-chemical cure). DC was assessed using attenuated total reflectance spectroscopic technique. Statistical comparison among groups was performed using analysis of variance (α = 0.05). The maximum and minimum PCS and DC values with delayed photo-initiation was observed in group-C (3.34 MPa) & group-F (2.44 MPa); and group-M (0.78 MPa) and group-H (0.55 MPa) respectively. Chemically cured samples showed the least PCS (group-G, 1.94) and DC (group-N, 0.53) values in their respective categories. PCS significantly decreased with delayed photo-initiation. A significant increase in DC was noticed when photo-initiation was delayed in the dual cure resin luting agent.     

Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhesives in class II resin restorations

Aim: The aim was to compare the microleakage of resin composite bonded with different adhesive systems in class-II cavities at enamel or dentine margins. Material and methods: 60 extracted human molar teeth received slot cavity preparations on mesial and distal surfaces (mesial cervical margin was prepared in enamel and distal in dentine). They were randomly divided into five groups (n?=?12) according to the adhesive system: Group-A: Silorane Bond (S), Group-B: Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), Group-C: Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Group-D: Single Bond Universal (USel) (selective etch-and-rinse), Group-E: Single Bond Universal (USE) (all-in-one). The preparations were restored using the same resin composite (Filtek Ultimate) except Group A which was restored by Silorane composite. The teeth were thermocycled, immersed in dye, sectioned, and dye penetration was evaluated quantitatively using image analysis. The data were analyzed using the two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test. Results: In all groups, there was no statistically significant difference between enamel margins at occlusal and gingival sites (p?>?0.05). The statistical difference between Group-A (S) and Group-B (SB) was significant at all margins. Group-B (SB) presented the greatest microleakage amounts at all margins and the highest scores were obtained in the dentine. Likewise, SB demonstrated statistically significant differences between dentine and enamel margins (occlusal and gingival)(p?<?0.05). Conclusion: All adhesive systems showed similar microleakage values between enamel margins in occlusal and gingival regions. However, when the gingival margin is located in the dentine, etch&rinse adhesive systems may not be a choice in terms of microleakage prevention.     

Adhesion of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements to indirect resin composite using different surface conditioning methods

This study evaluated the adhesion of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements to indirect resin composite (IRC) using different surface conditioning methods. Cylindrical IRC specimens (N = 192) were randomly assigned to four surface conditioning methods (n = 8 per group): (a) Control group, (b) Hydrofluoric acid, (c) Tribochemical silica-coating, and (d) 50 μm Al₂O₃ air-abrasion. Specimen surfaces were finished using silicon carbide papers up to 600 grit under water irrigation, rinsed and dried. Direct composite blocks were bonded to IRC specimens using three conventional resin cements (Multilink, Panavia F2.0, and Resicem) and three self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX U100, Gcem, Speed Cem). Specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Failure types were categorized as mixed, adhesive and cohesive. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Two-parameter Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (0) were calculated. The bond strength results (MPa) were significantly affected by the surface conditioning method (p < 0.0001) and cement type (p < 0.001). For Panavia F2.0, Resicem, air-abrasion with 50 μm Al₂O₃ significantly increased the results (22.6 ± 6.5, 26.2 ± 6.5, respectively) compared to other conditioning methods (13.6 ± 1.4–21.9 ± 3.1) but for Multilink, hydrofluoric acid etching (20.5 ± 3.5) showed significantly higher results (p < 0.01). For the self-adhesive resin cements, air-abrasion with 50 μm Al₂O₃ significantly increased the results compared to other conditioning methods, except for RelyX U100 (p < 0.05). After air-abrasion with Al₂O₃, Gcem, (11.64), RelyX U100 (9.05), and SpeedCem (8.29) presented higher Weilbul moduli. Exclusively cohesive failure in the IRC was observed with RelyX U100 and Speedcem after Al₂O₃ air-abrasion.     

The effect of MDP-based primer on shear bond strength of various cements to two different ceramic materials

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based primer on the shear bond strengths of thermally aged self-adhesive and conventional adhesive resin cements and zinc phosphate cement to zirconia and lithium disilicate substructures. Sixty zirconia (Z) and 60 lithium disilicate (L) disk specimens were cut from ceramic blocks. Each group was divided into six subgroups (n = 10). Half of the specimens of each ceramic group were treated with primer (P) and the other half was remained untreated. Three types of cement were applied: zinc phosphate cement [(ZPC) (Hoffmann Harmonic Shades)]; self-adhesive resin cement [(SAC) (RelyX U200)]; conventional adhesive resin cement [(CAC) (C&B)]. The specimens were subjected to thermal aging procedure for 1 week under 37 °C water bath. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed with three-way (ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons and interactions between groups were analyzed by using Tukey’s simultaneous confidence intervals. There was no significant difference between the SBS values of SAC-Z (11,47 ± 0,47) and SAC-ZP (11,39 ± 0,42) (p > 0.05). However, the SBS values of SAC-L (12.34 ± 0,55) and SAC-LP (12,50 ± 0,49) were significantly higher than those of SAC-Z and SAC-ZP (p < 0.00). The use of primer significantly increased the SBS value of CAC-ZP (8,05 ± 0,55) when compared to the SBS value of CAC-Z (3,53 ± 0,41) (p < 0.00). Resin cement that contains methacrylate monomers with phosphoric ester functional groups exhibited reliable bond to zirconia. However, the use of an MDP-based primer may not further improve its bond strength.     

Evaluation of the shear bond strength of two resin cements on different CAD/CAM materials

Objective: This study investigated the bond strength of two resin cements (Panavia F 2.0 and Multilink N) to different CAD/CAM materials: resin nanoceramic (RNC; Lava Ultimate), hybrid ceramic (HC; Vita Enamic), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLDC; Vita Suprinity), and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDG; IPS e.max CAD HT).

Material and methods: CAD/CAM blocks of 2-mm thickness were sectioned with a slow-speed diamond-saw sectioning machine. The slabs were then embedded in autopolymerizing acrylic resin (n = 12), and resin cements were applied to the surface of the specimens. All specimens were stored in water for 24 h and subjected to 5000 thermal cycles. Bond strength was measured by means of the shear bond strength test. The data were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey LSD post hoc tests.

Results: The results of the two-way ANOVA test indicated that the bond strength values varied significantly depending on the CAD/CAM restorative materials, resin cements, and interaction of these variables (p < 0.05). The RNC group showed the highest bond strength for Panavia F 2.0 (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences among other CAD/CAM materials for Panavia F 2.0 (p > 0.05). The LDG group showed the highest bond strength for Multilink N, it was followed by the ZLDC group (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences between RNC and HC groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Choosing resin cements for restorations should be done carefully because bond strength values vary significantly depending on the resin cement and CAD/CAM restorative material.     

Effect of dentinal surface preparation on the bonding of self-adhesive luting cements

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bond strength and the interaction morphology of self-adhesive resin luting cements (SLCs) to dentin prepared with different methods. Four SLCs were used: RelyX U100^®, RelyX U200^®, Clearfil SA Luting^®, and SmartCem2^®. A flat dentin surface of 40 human molars was exposed and each tooth was sectioned in four tooth-quarters, which were distributed into four groups according to the SLC used to cement indirect resin composite restorations. The tooth-quarters of each group were then distributed in four subgroups according to the method used for dentin preparation: flat-ended cylindrical fine-grit diamond, flat-ended cylindrical median-grit diamond, flat-ended cylindrical plain-cut tungsten carbide, or abraded with #600-grit SiC paper (control). The restored tooth-quarters were sectioned to obtain beams (0.8?mm²) and submitted to the microtensile bond strength test (n?=?10). The results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA/Tukey (α?=?0.05). Forty-four additional teeth were used for micromorphological investigation of the SLC/dentin interface and of the topographic aspect of the dentin surfaces after application of the SLCs. Only the bond strength of RelyX U200 was significantly influenced by the surface preparation. No interference was identified on the micromorphological aspect of the bonding interfaces. The topographic investigation of the dentinal surfaces showed that the SLCs were not able to effectively remove the smear layer and etch the underlying dentin, irrespective of the preparation method. So, the interference of the dentin preparation on the bond strength of SLCs is material dependent, but don’t influence the micromorphologic aspect of the interaction zone.     

Effect of clinical and laboratory contamination media on the adhesion of luting cement to direct and indirect resin composite materials

This study evaluated the effect of contamination media on the adhesion of resin cement to resin composites. Specimens of direct (DRC) (Quadrant Photo Posterior) and indirect resin composite (IRC) (Gradia) (N = 300, n = 15 per group) were prepared. Except the control group (C), the specimens of DRC and IRC were contaminated with one of the following media: (a) saliva (S), (b) silicon (SI), (c) dental stone (D), and (d) isolation medium (I). While one half was only rinsed with water, the other half was silica coated (30 μm SiO₂, Siljet). All specimens were silanized (Monobond Plus) and coated with adhesive resin (Heliobond). Resin cement (Variolink II) was bonded to the substrates and photo-polymerized for 40 s. After thermocycling (x5.000, 5–55 °C), composite–cement interface was loaded under shear in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using Univariate analysis, Tukey’s and Dunnett-T3 tests. Both contamination media (p = 0.000) and surface conditioning (p = 0.005) significantly affected adhesion to DRC and IRC. No significant difference was found between the DRC and IRC (without: p = 0.098; with: p = 0.084). Significantly lower results were obtained after SI (DRC: 0.66 ± 0.6; IRC: 0.8 ± 1.3) followed by I contamination (DRC: 2.1 ± 2.6; IRC: 0.8 ± 1.3) (p < 0.05). Regardless of contamination medium, surface conditioning significantly increased the results for both DRC (15.1 ± 6.1–23.6 ± 3.7) and IRC (20.3 ± 5.4–25.1 ± 3.6) (p < 0.05). Weibull distribution increased after surface conditioning for both DRC (without: 1.33–3.27; with: 2.55–9.34) and IRC (without: 1.07–3.75; with: 3.7–7.73). Predominantly adhesive (132 out of 150) failures were observed when surfaces were not conditioned.     

Adhesion of dual-polymerized luting cement on superficial and deep dentin using different one-step self-etch mild adhesive systems

This study evaluated adhesion of dual-polymerized resin cement to superficial dentin (SD) and deep dentin (DD) using one-step self-etch adhesives at varying pH. After smear layer was created on third molars (N?=?60, n?=?15 per group), adhesive resins, 1- Clearfil S3 Bond Plus-CBP (Kuraray) (pH: 2.3), 2- Bisco All Bond Universal-BAU (Bisco) (pH: 3.2), 3- Single Bond Universal Adhesive-SBU (3M ESPE) (pH: 2.7), 4- Nova Compo-B Plus-NCBP (Imicryl) (pH: 2.5–3), were applied on SD and DD. Resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent) was adhered incrementally on the SD surfaces using polyethylene molds and photo-polymerized for 40?s from 5 directions (output: 1200?mw/cm²). After macroshear and microshear test, in order to achieve DD specimens, SD were removed 1?mm in the pulp direction and the same bonding and test procedures were performed. The specimens were kept at 37?°C for 24?h. The adhesion tests were conducted in the Universal Testing Machine and failure types were analyzed. The data were analyzed using Univariate ANOVA, Tukey`s, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (α?=?.05). Test method, dentin level and the adhesive resin significantly affected the results (MPa) (p?<?.05). After macroshear test, more incidences of cohesive failures in DD were observed with NCBP Plus. On SD, NCBP presented the highest results followed by BAU using macroshear test. On DD, NCBP presented the highest results followed by SBU. Not only the pH but the chemical composition affected adhesion especially to SD while in DD, the difference between the adhesive resins was less significant.     

Effect of timing for core preparation,luting cement type and root level on adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin

This study assessed the effect of timing of core preparation and luting cement on adhesion of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts on different levels of intraradicular dentin when cemented with either conventional dual-polymerized or self-adhesive resin cement. Single-rooted human teeth (N = 80) were endodontically treated and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 40) according to resin cement: (a) Conventional dual resin cement (Variolink II, V) or (b) Self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, R). They were further divided into two subgroups according to timing of core preparation (n = 20): (a) immediate (i) or (b) delayed (d). FRC posts (Cytec Blanco) were cemented and the roots were sliced into discs at the coronal, middle, and apical levels. Push-out tests were then performed in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests considering the factors ‘core preparation time’, ‘luting cement’, and ‘root level’ (α = 0.05). Type of luting cement (p < 0.001), time of core preparation (p < 0.001), and root level (p < 0.001) significantly affected the bond strength results. R cement was more significantly affected by core preparation time (Ri: 2.91 ± 1.1; Rd: 4.83 ± 1.68) compared to V cement (Vi: 2.92 ± 1.63; Vd: 2.65 ± 1.6) (p < 0.05). Coronal region demonstrated significantly higher bond strength values than those of middle and apical third in all groups (coronal: 4 ± 1.9; middle: 3.1 ± 1.4; apical: 2.4 ± 1.1) (p < 0.05). Adhesive failure between cement and dentin was the most frequent (64%) followed by adhesive failure between cement and post (18%). Delayed core preparation can improve bond strength of FRC posts to intraradicular dentin when cemented with self-adhesive cement compared to conventional dual-polymerized resin cement.     

PF与UF复合树脂对制品粘接性能的影响

以酚醛树脂(PF)为基础,与不同加量的脲醛树脂(UF)复合,形成一系列复合胶粘剂。在不同的热压条件下,用复合胶粘剂压制竹帘胶合板,经对各组分制品的耐沸水和耐老化性检验,确认当热压温度为140℃时,UF树脂的最大加量可以达到PF树脂量的40%。     

Effect of monolithic zirconia on the degree of conversion of two resin cements analyzed by FT-IR/ATR spectroscopy

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) of two different resin cements polymerized under the monolithic zirconia specimens in different thicknesses and colors.

Material and methods: Partially stabilized monolithic zirconia blocks (inCoris TZI) were cut into three different thicknesses (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm) and the specimens were divided into four color groups (A1, A2, A3, and A4). The light transmittance of each specimen was measured. Panavia F 2.0 or Variolink N resin cement was applied into teflon mold and irradiated using the light emitting diode curing unit for 20 s under monolithic zirconia specimen (n = 10). The resin cement specimens were stored at room temperature under dry conditions. The DC of each specimen was measured by Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflection (FT-IR/ATR) spectroscopy after the 1st and 10th day. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), two-way repeated measures ANOVA, three-way repeated measures ANOVA, and the Tukey least significant difference (LSD) tests (α = 0.05).

Results: The light-cure resin cement groups showed higher DC than the dual-cure resin cement groups (p < 0.05). The DC of both resin cements reduced with an increase in the thickness and darkening of the color of monolithic zirconia specimens. There was a statistically meaningful increase in the 10th-day values for dual-cure resin cement (p < 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences between the 1st- and 10th-day values for light-cure resin cement (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The use of light-cure resin cement can be suggested for the luting of monolithic zirconia restorations.     

Evaluation of a new test method to determine the failure mode and macro-shear bond strength of dental materials to metals

Objective: To compare the macro mean shear bond strength (SBS) and failure mode of three cements to two types of metal using mould-enclosed and non-enclosed cement specimens. Methods: Titanium and base metal cobalt-based substrates were finished with 50 μm aluminium oxide. Two resin-modified glass-ionomers (Riva Luting Plus, Fuji Plus) and one resin cement (RelyX Unicem) were prepared as per manufacturers’ instructions. Metal mould-enclosed and non-enclosed cement specimens with a bonding area diameter of 3.5?mm were prepared and stressed to failure using a 2 mm blunt edge shear knife at a cross-head speed of 1?mm/min to determine mean SBS. The shear knife was placed against the surface of the substrate. Failure analysis of the failed interface was performed with a stereo microscope at 40× magnification. Results: Two-way Analysis of Variance demonstrated a significant difference in mean SBS between materials (p?=?0.004) and cement (p?=?0.001). There was also a significant interaction between method and cement on SBS, F(2,?170)?=?7.209, p?=?0.003. Post hoc Tukey tests demonstrated no significant difference for either resinmodified glass-ionomer cements (RMGIC) (p?=?0.864, p?=?0.620) when comparing non-enclosed and mould-enclosed test methods bonded to titanium. There was however a significant difference (p?<?0.001) between the mean SBS obtained for the resin cement when comparing the non-enclosed and mould-enclosed test methods. For base metal, the RMGIC’s SBS was higher than resin cement but no difference was observed between one of RMGIC’s and the resin cement non-enclosed mean SBS. Although not the case for RMGIC’s bonded to titanium or one RMGIC bonded to non-precious cobalt-based metal, when comparing the test method on each cement, RMGIC and the resin cement showed significant differences between non- and mould-enclosed specimens mean SBS. In the non-enclosed specimen tests, 71% of all specimens tested exhibited adhesive failure, which was statistically different (p?<?0.001) to 91% for the mould-enclosed specimens. Failure mode was not always statistically different within groups, however non-enclosed specimens showed higher frequencies of mixed failures. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, significant differences were found in comparing the mean SBS between mould-enclosed and non-enclosed specimens. A significant difference was found in failure mode between mould-enclosed and non-mould enclosed specimens. Mould-enclosed specimens bonded to metal exhibited a higher frequency of adhesive failure than non-mould enclosed specimens. Relevance: Mould-enclosed specimens used in place of non-enclosed specimens can be used in SBS testing to give a more valid result when bonding to metal.