Influence of desensitizing procedures on adhesion of resin cements to dentin

This study evaluated the effect of two desensitizer agents with different contents and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on the shear bond strength (SBS) of adhesive resin cements to dentin. New treatment options of Nd:YAG laser irradiation and tetracalcium phosphate-containing agent applications were compared with routinely used glutaraldehyde-containing agents. One hundred and twenty human, caries-free premolars were embedded in acrylic resin blocks 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction. Buccal surfaces of the teeth were ground to expose dentin. The specimens were randomly assigned into three different surface treatments (desensitizing agents, Nd:YAG laser) and the control, then into three different adhesive resin cement applications (n = 10). Resin cements (Panavia SA cement (PA), Panavia SA cement with Clearfil Universal Bond (PACU), and Multilink N (MN)) were applied to the conditioned teeth surfaces using Teflon tubes. The specimens were thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5–55 ± 1 °C, dwell time 30 s). The SBS test was performed in all groups. The results were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (p < .05). Further, SEM analysis was performed on the dentin surfaces. SBS values were significantly difference among the surface treatment groups and also among adhesive resin cement groups (p < .05). The specimen cemented with PA showed lower SBS values than PACU- and MN-applied specimens. The highest SBS value was obtained in the Nd:YAG laser group which was cemented with PACU cement. The lowest SBS value was obtained in the control group which was cemented with PA cement. In addition, SEM evaluation revealed that desensitizing agents and Nd:YAG laser occluded dentin tubules.     

Bond Strength of Porcelain Bonded to Enamel and Dentin Surfaces Prepared with Different Surface Treatments

Although acid etching is routinely used to condition tooth surfaces, it increases the caries susceptibility of enamel and enhances enamel demineralization; thus the role of alternative surface treatments such as alumina air abrasion and erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser irradiation for tooth conditioning is controversial. This study was undertaken to compare the effects of different conditioning methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement on enamel and dentin. Prepared permanent human dentin and enamel samples (N = 210) embedded in clear acrylic resin were conditioned by 37% phosphoric acid etching, 50-µm alumina air abrasion, Er:YAG laser irradiation (120 mJ, 10 Hz, medium short pulse mode), or their combinations. Porcelain laminates were cemented by using photopolymerizing luting composite. SBS was evaluated after thermal cycling (10,000 cycles, 5–55°C) and fracture types (adhesive, cohesive, or mixed) were observed by stereomicroscopy. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance and followed by Tamhane's test (p < 0.05). Enamel and dentin specimens showed significant differences in SBS (p < 0.000). Er:YAG laser etching presents successful alternatives to acid etching on dentin surfaces; it does not enhance adhesion of the resin cement on enamel surfaces.     

The effects of water flow rate on shear bond strength of self etch resin cement to dentin surface after Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of water flow rate on the morphological features of dentin and shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etching resin cement after Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching. Dentin specimens obtained from extracted human third molars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 23), including one that received no laser irradiation (control-group D) and three others with different laser parameters: 2.25 W, 50 Hz, 60% air with water flow rates of 19 mL/min-100% water (group A), 2.25 W, 50 Hz, 6.75 mL/min-50% water (group B), and 2.25 W, and 50 Hz, 2.75 mL/min-25% water (group C). The morphological features of each group were examined with scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The SBS of resin cement disks (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray; Tokyo, Japan) (3 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height) to the dentin specimens was measured using a universal testing machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Bond strength values were analyzed with one-way ANOVA/Tukey tests. There were no significant differences between the SBS values of groups A and B (p > 0.05). However, the SBS values of these groups were significantly higher when compared to groups C and D (p < 0.001). Er,Cr:YSGG laser application with water flow rates of 6.75 or 19 mL/min resulted in better dentin surface alterations and increased the SBS of self-etching resin cement to dentin.     

Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic and metal alloy*

The bonding of resin cement to ceramic materials plays an important role in dentistry. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia ceramic and metal alloy. A total of 60 specimens were prepared from Y-TZP ceramic and metal alloy. The specimens were divided into three subgroups (n = 10) that received different surface treatments for each material. An Er:YAG laser (ER), a femtosecond laser (FS), and air-borne particle abrasion (A) were employed as surface treatments. One specimen from each group was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 500 x magnification after surface treatments. The self-adhesive resin cement was then bonded to the treated surfaces using a Teflon mold. The specimens were thermocycled for 5,000 cycles at 5–55 °C, and then the SBS test was performed. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to determine the differences between the groups (p = 0.05), and failure modes were evaluated for each specimen. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the surface treatment methods. The mean SBS values of the air-borne particle-abraded groups were higher than those of the other groups. The femtosecond-irradiated groups of each material showed significantly higher SBS values than the Er:YAG-irradiated groups (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, air-borne particle abrasion and the femtosecond laser were more effective than Er:YAG laser treatment.     

Effect of caries removal techniques on bond strength to caries affected dentin on gingival wall: AFM observation of dentinal surface

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different caries removal techniques on the bond strength of two adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Seventy human molar teeth that had proximal carious lesions were randomly divided into four groups according to the technique used to remove the caries: a conventional steel bur, an Er:YAG laser, a chemomechanical Carisolv^® gel, and air polishing. The groups were then divided into two subgroups according to the adhesives used: Clearfil S³ (Kuraray Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and Adper SE Plus (3 M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). The enamel and superficial dentin of the crown was flattened and caries were removed using different methods. Teeth were restored with composite and three 1 mm² stick-shaped microtensile specimens were prepared from each tooth. For each removal technique, the surface roughness of one dentin sample was analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM). The microtensile bond strength data were then analyzed using a two-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests, and multiple comparison tests (p = 0.05). Results: The two-way ANOVA showed that the effects of the cavity preparation techniques and adhesive systems and their interaction were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The μTBS values were highest when bonding with Adper SE Plus to cavities prepared with the steel bur (37.20 ± 11.65 MPa) and lowest when bonding with Clearfil S³ Bond to cavities prepared with the Er:YAG laser (16.74 ± 6.95 MPa). Conclusion: The caries removal techniques affected the bond strength values of the self-etch adhesive systems.     

Effects of neutralizing or antioxidant agents on the consequences induced by enamel bleaching agents in immediate resin composite restorations

Purpose: Bleaching agents are claimed to impair the bonding to the tooth structure when resin composite restorations are immediately performed. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a neutralizing solution (10% sodium bicarbonate) or an antioxidant agent (10% sodium ascorbate) on the immediate or delayed (15 days) shear bond strength (SBS) of composite restorations performed on enamel. Seventy flat buccal enamel surfaces obtained from bovine incisors were divided into seven groups (n = 10): control group, unbleached enamel, restored (3M ESPE/Adper Single Bond 2/Filtek Z350XT) (G1); bleached, immediately restored (G2); bleached, delayed restoration (G3); bleached, antioxidant (sodium ascorbate), immediately restored (G4); bleached, antioxidant, delayed restoration (G5); bleached, neutralizing (sodium bicarbonate), immediate restoration (G6); bleached, neutralizing, delayed restoration (G7). Specimens were submitted to SBS test and examined after failure using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results were statistically analyzed with ANOVA/Tukey’s tests (5%). Bonding to enamel immediately restored after bleaching (G2) was significantly lower than G1 (unbleached enamel; p < 0.05). Applying the antioxidant or neutralizing agent significantly improved the bonding to enamel compared with G2 (bleached, immediate restored), irrespective of the restoration time (immediate or delayed) (p < 0.05). No significance was found between the two agents when applied after bleaching, and compared with the control group, regardless of evaluation time (p > 0.05). SEM images demonstrated adhesive failures in the bleached, immediately restored group (G2). G3–G7 exhibited majority of cohesive and mixed failure patterns. 10% sodium bicarbonate or 10% sodium ascorbate neutralizes the negative immediate and delayed effects of bleaching on bond strength of enamel bleached enamel.     

Temperature rises during tooth bleaching with different light-curing units

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of three different light-curing units on the temperature rise induced in the pulpal cavity, when bleached with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). Forty extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into four groups according to photoactivation procedure (n = 10). Whiteness HP (WHP) bleaching agent which contains 35% HP bleach was placed on the facial tooth surface and no photoactivation device was used (control); an blue light-emitting diode (LED, 40 s), a diode laser (4 W, Continous mode, 20 s), and Nd:YAG laser (4 W, 60 Hz frequency, 20 s). Temperature rise in the pulpal chamber was measured with a J-type thermocouple wire that was connected to a data logger before and immediately after each 20–40 s application. One tooth of each group was selected for scanning electron microscope analysis. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Games Howell post hoc test at a preset α of 0.05. One-way ANOVA revealed that there was a significant difference among the light-curing units (p < 0.05) and between control group and light-curing units (p < 0.05). The Nd:YAG induced significantly, which resulted in higher temperature increase than other light-curing units (10.7 °C). The LED unit produced the lowest temperature changes (3.2 °C) among the light-curing units. The presence of the bleaching gel did not cause a temperature increase in control group (0 °C). The results suggested that using light-curing units caused temperature changes in the intrapulpal cavity during tooth bleaching. The use of LED will be more safer for pulpal health when assisted with WHP bleaching gel.     

The effect of different in-office bleaching techniques and etching procedures on bond strength of orthodontic brackets

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different in-office bleaching techniques and acid/laser etching on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Ninety-six extracted human premolar teeth were used in the study. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups according to different in-office bleaching techniques (n = 24); Group I: Diode laser-assisted bleaching, Group II: Er:YAG laser-assisted bleaching, Group III: In-office bleaching with LED, Group IV: Unbleached (control). After the samples were kept in artificial saliva for 2 weeks, each group were randomly divided into 2 subgroups according to etching methods; a–acid etching; b–laser etching. For laser etching Er,Cr:YSGG laser was used at 1.5 W, 15 Hz with 140 μs pulse duration for 20 s. For acid etching, 37% phosphoric acid was used for 30 s. The shear bond strength testing was performed using Instron Testing Machine with a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores were also measured. Data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between bleaching groups and control (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between acid and laser etching within each group (p < 0.05). Acid etching caused significantly higher bond strength values (p < 0.05). While no statistically significant differences were observed between the ARI scores of bleaching and control groups (p > 0.05), acid etching caused statistically higher ARI scores than laser etching groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion in-office bleaching either with LED or laser before bracket bonding did not affect bond strength. Prior to bracket bonding, acid etching of enamel caused higher shear bond strength values than laser etching.     

Microleakage in class V cavities prepared using conventional method versus Er:YAG laser restored with glass ionomer cement or resin composite

This study evaluated the effect of tooth preparation method (diamond bur vs. Er:YAG laser) on the microleakage levels of glass ionomers and resin composite. Human permanent premolars (N = 80) were randomly divided into two groups (n = 40). Cavities on half of the teeth were prepared using diamond bur for enamel and carbide bur for dentin and the other half using Er:YAG laser. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups according to the restoration materials, namely (a) ChemFil Rock (CFR), (b) IonoluxAC (IAC), (c) EQUIA system (EQA) and one resin composite (d) AeliteLS (ALS) (n = 10 per group). Microleakage (μm) was assessed at the occlusal and gingival margins after dye penetration (0.5% basic fuchsine for 24 h). On the occlusal aspect, while the cavity preparation types significantly affected the microleakage for CFR (p = 0.015), IAC (p = 0.001) glass ionomer restorations, it did not show significant effect for glass ionomer EQA (p = 0.09) and resin composite ALS (p = 0.2). Er:YAG laser presented less microleakage compared to bur preparation in all groups except for EQA. On the gingival aspect, microleakage decreased significantly for CFR (p = 0.02), IAC (p = 0.001), except for EQA where significant increase was observed (p = 0.001) with the use of Er:YAG laser. Microleakage decrease was not significant at the gingival region between diamond bur and Er:YAG laser for ALS (p = 0.663). At the occlusal and gingival sites in all groups within each preparation method, microleakage level was not significant.     

Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser preparation on dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin prepared with SiC paper or an Er,Cr:YSGG laser using different bonding strategies (etch-and-rinse versus self-etch mode). Ninety-six extracted caries-free, sound human molars were used. The teeth were longitudinally sectioned in the mesiodistal direction and were wet polished with 600-grit SiC paper to obtain a standardized flat dentin surface. All prepared teeth were randomly divided into two groups, according to the surface preparation method: GroupI:an erbium, chromium:yttrium,scandium, gallium, garnet laser; Group II: silicon carbide paper[SiC] (n = 48). Each group was then assigned into three subgroups according to the universal adhesive’s (Single Bond Universal) bonding strategies: (a) etch-and-rinse mode with phosphoric acid, (b) etch-and-rinse mode with a laser, (c) self-etch mode (n = 16). For surface preparation, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser was used at 3 W, 30 Hz with 140 μs pulse duration for 25 s. For etching mode, the laser was used at 1.5 W (60% air, 70% water). Cylinders of composite were fabricated on the bonding area and shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test (p < 0.05). Bonding strategies showed statistically significant differences in both the SiC-and laser-prepared groups (p < 0.05).Universal adhesive used in etch-and-rinse mode with acid showed significantly higher bond strength values than in self-etch mode (p < 0.05). The bond strength values did not differ according to the surface preparation method (p > 0.05). Irrespective of preparation method, using universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode with acid might improve dentin bond strength. Laser preparation did not affect the bond strength of the universal adhesive tested.     

The effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation on root surface: shear-bond strength and SEM–EDX study

To investigate the effects of Nd:YAG laser and 17% EDTA treatment on root-dentin mineral content using scanning electron microscope–energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDX) and on shear-bond strength of epoxy-resin-based sealer (AH Plus) to root dentin. Twelve extracted premolars were decoronated and roots were sectioned, so that 24 two-root halves were obtained. Element levels of each half were examined by SEM/EDX, and AH Plus build-ups were created. After shear-testing, the test surfaces were reground and subjected to a 5.25% NaOCl. Two subgroups were created according to the surface treatment (n = 12): G1, with 17% EDTA for 5 min; G2, with the Nd:YAG laser. The element level analysis and shear-bond strength test were repeated for each half; the data were recorded (MPa) and analyzed (paired samples t-test). The EDTA treatment increased the O, C, Ca/P ratio (p < 0.001), decreased Ca, P content (p = 0.000), but did not change Na, Mg content (p > 0.05). The Nd:YAG laser increased O, Ca/P ratio (p < 0.001), and decreased the Ca, P content (p = 0.000). The C, Mg, Na content did not change with the Nd:YAG laser (p > 0.05). Both 17% EDTA and Nd:YAG laser had an effect on the mineral content of roots. The 17% EDTA treatment decreased the shear-bond strength of AH Plus to root dentin (p = 0.000); however, the Nd:YAG laser did not affect the bond strength (p = 0.238). Thus, an Nd:YAG laser can be used for disinfection of the root canal when AH Plus is used as a sealer.     

Effect of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate application and water storage on the bond strength to superficial and deep dentin

The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine, applied before a self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond) on microtensile bond strength to superficial and deep dentin (DD), immediately and after six months of water storage (WS). Forty dentin specimens were divided into two groups according to dentin depth: superficial and deep. The specimens were then divided according to the solution to be applied (n = 10): CLX: 2% chlorhexidine (passively applied for 60 s) and NT (no treatment). A self-etching adhesive system was applied according to the manufactures instructions, with composite restorative placed on the dentin surface. After 24 h, dentin–resin blocks were sectioned into beam-shaped specimens that were submitted to microtensile bond strength testing either immediately or after six months of WS. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Bond strength values for the deep dentin group were significantly lower than those observed for superficial dentin (SD) (p = 0.002), whether chlorhexidine solution had been applied or not. There was no statistical difference in bond strength for specimens tested after 24 h and 6 months of WS. The application of chlorhexidine did not affect immediate and long-term bond strength to dentin. Bond strength in deep dentin was lower than in SD.     

The effect of different surface pretreatments on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different surface pretreatment methods on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) based aesthetic frameworks. Five hundred and forty PEEK disks were fabricated and divided into 6 pretreatment groups (n = 90); (C) untreated control group, (B) airborne-particle abrasion, (S) silica coating, (L) etching with Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) laser, (LB) etching with Er:YAG laser and airborne-particle abrasion and (LS) etching with Er:YAG laser and silica coating. After topographical surface examinations, specimens were conditioned with adhesive and veneering resin was polymerized onto the PEEK specimens. Twenty-four hours after veneering, specimens were subjected to thermal aging. Afterwards, shear bond strength (SBS) tests were performed and the obtained data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey test at a significance level of α = .05. Group B (1.58 ± 0.15 μm), Group L (1.79 ± 0.29 μm), Group LB (2.20 ± 0.23 μm) and Group LS (2.31 ± 0.52 μm) demonstrated significantly higher surface roughness (SR) values compared to Group C (1.03 ± 0.11 μm). Group B (10.97 ± 2.88 MPa), Group S (12.07 ± 2.82 MPa), Group LB (12.09 ± 2.08 MPa) and Group LS (13.14 ± 1.45 MPa) demonstrated significantly higher SBS values compared to Group C (6.35 ± 1.21 MPa). Airborne-particle abrasion, silica coating or their combined use with Er:YAG laser system establish durable bond between PEEK and resin; however, only Er:YAG laser treatment has no positive effect on resin-PEEK bond.     

Effect of erosive challenge and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation and erosive challenge on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin.MethodsTwenty bovine incisors were cut and grounded to obtain eighty slabs of flat dentin. Specimens were allocated into eight groups, based on: adhesive system—a two-step etch-and-rinse and a two-step self-etch; laser irradiation—Nd:YAG (1 W/10 Hz) or control (no laser irradiation); and erosive challenge after restorative procedure—presence or absence of erosive challenge. Nd:YAG laser groups were submitted to laser irradiation before the restorative procedure. Blocks of composite resin were built up on the bonded surfaces with a Southern Dental Industries device to perform shear bond strength (SBS) test. After, each specimen of erosive challenge, groups were subjected to immersion in Sprite Zero^® (20 ml/2 h/24 °C/under agitation). The SBS test (0.5 mm/min) was performed after 24 h of water storage at 37 °C. Failure mode was evaluated with a stereomicroscope (X400). Data were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests (α=0.05).ResultsThe etch-and-rinse adhesive system presented higher bond strength values than self-etch adhesive. Laser irradiation increased the bond strengths values when erosive challenge was present. The predominant failure mode observed was adhesive.ConclusionsThe irradiation of Nd:YAG laser positively influences the bond strength values when erosive challenges are present. Moreover, the etch-and-rinse adhesive system is a better option to be used in dentin in this clinical condition.     

Laser type effects on repair bond strength of ormocers and nanoceramic based composites

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments and different restoration materials on repair bond strength of ormocer and nanoceramic based composites. 24 (12 Admira, Voco, 12 Ceram X duo, Dentsply) thermally aged blocks (6 × 6 × 5 mm) were roughened with either bur, Er:YAG or Nd:YAG laser. In each group half of the roughened samples were repaired with composite of their respective brand; other half was repaired with composite of the other brand. All samples were subjected to microtensile bond strength test. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni correction, Mann-Whitney U test (p = 0.05). For roughening methods no significant difference was found between Bur-Er:YAG (p = 0.536), however between the other groups (Bur-Nd:YAG and Er:YAG-Nd:YAG) significant difference were found (p < 0.001). For Admira as a filler material, no significant differences were found for bur, Er:YAG, Nd:YAG groups based on repair materials. For Ceram X duo as a filler material, while no significant differences were found for bur and Er:YAG groups; a significant difference was found for Nd:YAG group based on repair materials. A weak significant difference was found between the repair composite groups undergone thermocycling or not (p = 0.04). Surface roughening with Er:YAG laser can be used clinically for the repair of aged composite restorations.     

The effect of Er:YAG laser and bulk filled composite type on marginal adaptation of class II cavities: an SEM analysis study

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of cavity preparation method (Er:YAG laser or diamond bur) and bulk-filled composite material type on marginal adaptation mesial occlusal (MO) class II cavities. Materials and Methods: Two-surface box cavities (4-mm proximal depth and 5-mm occlusal width) were prepared on 60 human mandibular molar teeth. Cavities were prepared using Er:YAG laser or diamond burs in an air-turbine hand-piece. All cavities were applied Single Bond Universal dentin bonding agent. The cavities were further subdivided into three subgroups according to the restorative material used; two bulk-filled composites [Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior (3M ESPE) and SonicFill 2 (Kerr)] and one traditional composite material Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative (3M ESPE). Restorations were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy at ×200 magnification for their adaptation to the approximal margins of the tooth. Results were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA and Tukey Post Hoc Test (p < 0.05). Results: A total of 900 SEM figures were obtained from all groups. Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior, SonicFill 2, and Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative exhibited statistically similar gapped margins. However, the lowest scores of gapped margins were observed with SonicFill 2 (4.22%). Conclusions: Completely gap-free margins were not obtained with any of the tested materials. Bulk-fill composite materials showed similar marginal adapatation compared with standard composite. Marginal adaptation of Er:YAG laser prepared cavities was more irregular and had more gaps, but was statistically similar to diamond bur-prepared cavities.     

Evaluation of bonding effectiveness of a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive resin to un-treated and Er:Yag laser treated dentin using mini-interfacial fracture toughness test

The aim of current study was to assess interfacial bonding effectiveness of self-etch and etch-and-rinse dental adhesives to untreated and Er:YAG laser-treated dentine using mini-interfacial fracture toughness (mini-iFT) test. 32 selected non-carious third molars were divided into two groups: untreated and Er:YAG laser treated. The laser-treated specimens were subjected to Er:YAG laser with energy density of 25.82?J/cm². Both groups were further assigned to two groups based on adhesive systems: self-etch and etch-and-rinse. The teeth were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive/dentine interface to obtain 1.5?×?2?mm wide longitudinal rectangular sections. A single notch then was prepared at the adhesive-dentine interface. The mini-iFT test was done via a 4-point bend testing until failure and the KIC was calculated. All specimens were observed using a, scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significant level of 0.05. Weibull parameters including Weibull modulus and characteristic strength also were calculated for each experimental group. Two-way ANOVA showed both variables (the type of adhesive system and laser treatment) significantly influenced the mini-iFT values of specimens (p?≤?0.001). The self-etch and laser-treated group showed lower mini-iFT than the etch-and-rinse and untreated samples. SEM observations revealed that the fracture region was located at the adhesive-dentine interface in most of the specimens. The Er:YAG laser treatment may adversely affects the bonding effectiveness of the dentine/adhesive interface. The mini-iFT method can be used as a discriminative and valid method for the evaluation of bonding effectiveness at the adhesive-dentine interface.     

Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite

Purpose: To evaluate the wetting ability and the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems in various depths of dentin. Materials and Method: 48 extracted human molars cut in half in buccolingual direction. Buccal and lingual surfaces were used to obtain deep (n = 48) and superficial (n = 48) dentin. Groups were divided into 4 subgroups: Self-etch (CSE), etch&rinse (SB), multi-mode self-etch (SAU) and multimode etch&rinse (EAU) adhesive systems. 3 consecutive contact-angle measurements were obtained: T0- 3 μl drop of distilled water on dentin; T1-Droplet of the adhesive; T2- Distilled water after polymerization of the adhesive. After composite build-ups, microtensile measurements were performed. Contact angle data were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measures. Bond strength data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance, comparisons were made according to the logarithmic values (p < 0.05). Results: The difference between groups was not significant regardless of dentin depth for all measurements (p < 0.05). All groups except CSE enhanced the wetting ability of the adhesive but reduced the wetting ability of distilled water after application of the adhesive (p < 0.05). Regarding adhesive systems, the groups showed no significant difference between bond strengths to various depths of dentin except SAU (p > 0.05); in SAU, bond strength to deep dentine were significantly higher than superficial dentin (p < 0.05). Regarding adhesives’ bond strength, CSE showed significantly greater values than the other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The cavity depth does not affect the bonding ability for all adhesive systems; self-etch adhesive systems might be a better choice since different adhesives may influence the wetting ability and microtensile bond strength of the dentin substrates.     

Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser surface conditioning on the adhesion of fiber- reinforced composite and zirconia intraradicular posts to the root dentin

This study evaluated the influence of Er,Cr:YSGG laser surface conditioning on push-out bond strength of different root posts to the root dentin. Extracted (N = 27, n = 9 per group) and endodontically treated human mandibular premolars were prepared to receive the posts. Three types of posts, namely quartz fiber (D), glass fiber (S), and zirconium dioxide post (C) were luted with resin cement. The posts were randomly assigned to one of the surface conditioning method: (a) No conditioning, control (L0), (b) Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 175 mJ, 3.5 W for 60 s (L1), and (c) at 225 mJ, 4.5 W for 60 s, with 60 μs pulse duration and repetition rate was 20 Hz (L2) irradiation. Six sections (two coronal, two middle, and two apical) were made in each tooth yielding to 1 mm thick specimens. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37?°C for 24 h and push-out bond strength (MPa) was tested in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data were analyzed using Kruskall–Wallis and Dunns`s post hoc tests (α = 0.05). In group D, both laser treated groups (L1:16.16 ± 19.89; L2:8.24 ± 9.26) presented significantly less bond strength compared to control group (L0:28.3 ± 16.8) (p < 0.001). Mean push-out bond strength values did not significantly differ according to the root segments (coronal, middle, and apical) (p = 0.106). Application of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, with the parameters tested, did not increase the bond strength of zirconium glass fiber and zirconium oxide posts. Laser surface conditioning decreased the bond strength of quartz fiber posts in the root canal.     

Bond strengths of bulk-fill resin composite repairs: effect of different surface treatment protocols in vitro

To evaluate the effect of different surface treatment protocols on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composite repairs. Thirty-five bulk-fill resin composite samples (Filtek Bulk Fill) were prepared (5 × 5 × 5 mm) and aged by thermocycling (X5000). Samples were randomly divided into five groups (n = 7): a control (no treatment) and four surface treatment groups (Single Bond Universal [SBU]; phosphoric acid (37%) + SBU; Er,Cr:YSGG laser + SBU; aluminum oxide sandblasting + SBU). Filtek Ultimate Universal composite was used as a repair material. After storage for 24 h in distilled water (37 °C), sticks were obtained and subjected to a μTBS test. The data (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with a post hoc test (α = 0.05). Failure mode was evaluated using a light microscope (10×). There were significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). The lowest bond strength values were obtained in the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between Group II (universal adhesive) and Group III (acid etch + universal adhesive) (p > 0.05). The bond strength of Group II was significantly lower than that of the other surface treatment groups (p < 0.05). While Group III showed significantly lower values than those of the laser treatment group (Group IV), similar values were obtained with Al₂O₃ sandblasting group (Group V). The highest repair bond strength was obtained in Group IV (p < 0.05) which was not significantly different from the Al₂O₃ sandblasting group (p > 0.05). The predominant failure mode was adhesive. Treatment of aged bulk-fill resin composite surfaces with laser and Al₂O₃ sandblasting provided higher repair bond strength values.