Effects of mixing techniques and dentin moisture conditions on push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine

Objective: To evaluate the influence of manual and mechanical mixing techniques as well as the effects of moisture on the push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA) and Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France) to radicular dentin.

Material and methods: Two hundred and forty dentin discs were assigned into three groups with respect to the moisture condition tested: (1) dry, (2) paper points, (3) wet. The discs were further divided into four subgroups according to the calcium silicate cements (CSCs) and mixing techniques used: (1) ProRoot MTA mixed manually, (2) ProRoot MTA mixed mechanically, (3) Biodentine mixed manually, and (4) Biodentine mixed mechanically. Bond strengths of the cements to root canal dentin were measured using a push-out test setup. The data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test p = 0.05.

Results: The data indicated that the push-out bond strength values were significantly affected by CSCs, mixing techniques, and moisture conditions (p < 0.001). Dry conditions caused a significant decrease in bond strength values for both CSCs (p < 0.001). The mean bond strength of Biodentine was significantly higher than that of ProRoot MTA, regardless of the mixing techniques and moisture conditions (p < 0.001). Mechanical mixing favored bond strength values statistically compared to manual mixing (p < .001).

Conclusion: The mixing techniques and moisture conditions have an effect on the push-out bond strengths of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. Dry samples and manual mixing of cements deteriorate the push-out bond strengths values.     

Effect of intracanal medicaments on the push-out bond strength of Biodentine in comparison with Bioaggregate apical plugs

To evaluate the effect of intracanal medicaments on the push-out bond strength of Biodentine in comparison with DiaRoot BioAggregate (BA) when used as apical plugs. Forty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Peeso reamers. The samples were divided into four groups. The intracanal medicaments were applied to the root canals as follows: Group1: a combination of metronidazole–ciprofloxacin–cefaclor, Group2: a combination of metronidazole–ciprofloxacin, Group3: calcium hydroxide, and Group4: no medication. After 21 days, the medicaments were removed. The apical part of each root was horizontally sectioned into 1-mm thick slices. The samples were divided into two subgroups, and the following materials were placed: Biodentine, DiaRoot-BioAggregate. After 48-h incubation, the push-out bond strength was measured. The data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA. Biodentine showed a significantly higher mean push-out bond strength value than DiaRoot-BioAggregate (P = 0.00). The medications have an effect on the push-out bond strength of both materials (P = 0.002). Biodentine showed better adhesive performance as an apical plug than DiaRoot-BioAggregate.     

The effect of root dentin conditioning protocols on the push-out bond strength of three calcium silicate sealers

Objectives: To compare the effects of irrigation protocols on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate materials at two different time periods (7-days and 3-months). Materials and methods: Root canals (n=300) were irrigated with one of the following (n=60): group 1 (3% NaOCl–17% EDTA); group 2 (17% EDTA–3% NaOCl); group 3 (1:1 mixture of 6% NaOCl and 18% etidronic acid); group 4 (3% NaOCl–QMix 2in1); group 5 (3% NaOCl–2% chlorhexidine). Specimens were subdivided into three subgroups (n=20): A, Endosequence BC sealer [EBC]; B, MTA Plus [MTA-P]; C, Tech Biosealer Endo [TECH]. Specimens were suspended in phosphate buffered saline [PBS] for 7 days or 3 months (n=10 per sealer). Push-out bond strength was measured and data were analyzed (P=0.05). Results: MTA-P: showed the highest bond strength at both time periods, when NaOCl+EA was used as an irrigant. This was not significantly different from the strength produced when NaOCl–QMix was used for 7 days (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the bond strengths of the three materials when irrigated with group 1, 2 or 5 (P>0.05), but these groups showed significantly lower bond strengths than groups 3 and 4 (P<0.05). While the bond strength of EBC and MTA-P in specimens irrigated with groups 3 and 4 improved significantly with time [P<0.05], this was not true for TECH. Conclusions: Push-out bond strength of calcium silicate cements was differentially influenced by irrigation protocol and time. MTA Plus showed the highest bond strength at both time periods, when root canals were irrigated with NaOCl+EA. The bond strength of Tech Biosealer Endo did not improve with time immaterial of the irrigation protocols.     

Effect of calcium hydroxide removal techniques on the bond strength of root canal sealers

To evaluate the influence of calcium-hydroxide(CH) with different vehicles on the push-out bond strength of different canal sealers to radicular dentin. 152 decrowned single-rooted human teeth were used. After preparation of root canals with nickel-titanium rotary files, 8 roots served as control groups. Then, the roots were divided as follows: (1) Calasept and (2) Surepaste (n = 72). Roots were further subgrouped according to the CH removal techniques: (1) %17 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) + rotary file, (2) %17EDTA + hand file, and (3) %17EDTA (n = 24). Eight roots from each group sectioned longitudinally, divided into two pairs and photographed by stereomicroscope (n = 16). The remaining 16 roots in CH intracanal dressing groups were further divided into 2 subgroups according to the sealer used: (1) AH-Plus-jet and (2) Apexit-Plus (n = 8). Bond strengths of the root canal sealers to root canal dentin were measured using a push-out test setup. The data were statistically analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance p = 0.05. The push-out bond strength values were significantly affected by type of vehicle and the removal techniques (p < 0.05). The mean bond strength of AH-Plus-jet was significantly higher than Apexit-Plus, regardless of type of vehicle and the removal techniques (p < 0.05). There was no difference between vehicles on CH removal (p > 0.05). When examining the removal techniques, only irrigation with %17 EDTA left significantly larger amount of residue (p < 0.05). AH-Plus-jet showed better dislocation resistance than Apexit-Plus. Type of vehicle does not play a fundamental role in the degree of persistence of CH residues on the dentin walls. Instrumentation improves the removal efficiency of CH from root canal.     

Influence of the ER,CR:YSGG laser and different irrigation methods on push-out bond strength of fiber post

Er,Cr:YSGG lasers are currently being investigated for disinfecting the root canal treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of various irrigation protocols on push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Fifty maxillary anterior teeth were divided into five groups (n = 10) according to the protocol that applied into the post space. Group-1: distilled water, Group-2: 5% NaOCl, Group-3: 2% CHX, Group-4: Er,Cr:YSGG laser (1.5 W, 20 Hz, 85 air, 75 water, 26.7 J/cm²), Group-5: Er,Cr:YSGG laser (1.25 W, 50 Hz, 34 air, 24 water, 12.7 J/cm²). Fiber posts were cemented with resin cement. The remaining part of the root, three slices were obtained from each specimen and push-out test was performed. One-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test at a 5% level of significance were used for the statistical analysis. Post space irradiation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser (1.5 W 20 Hz, 85 air, 75 water, 26.7 J/cm²) increases push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Further investigations are needed to establish and optimize ER,Cr:YSGG laser parameters to increase the push-out bond strength of fiber posts.     

The effect of combined use of chitosan and PIPS on push-out bond strength of root canal filling materials

Adhesion of root canal filling materials to root dentin is important for the long-term success of the treatment. Push-out bond strength test is used to evaluate the adhesion capacity of root canal filling materials to root canal walls. The aim of the present study is to compare the bond strength of root canal filling materials to root dentin after irrigation with EDTA, chitosan and the combination of chitosan and PIPS irridation using push-out bond strength test. Forty-eight extracted teeth were resected until 13-mm long roots were obtained. Root canals were prepared with a size-25 OneShape instrument. Samples were divided into three groups each including 15 roots. Group 1: Canals were rinsed with 0.2% chitosan and subjected to laser irridation with PIPS at the same time. Group 2: Canals were rinsed with 0.2% chitosan. Group 3: Canals were rinsed with EDTA. All canals were filled with .06 tapered gutta-percha and AH-plus sealer. One-mm thick slices were taken from coronal, middle and apical one-thirds of the roots. Push-out bond strength was determined using a Universal Testing Machine. One root from each group was observed under SEM to evaluate the degree of smear removal. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskall-Wallis test. Results showed that bond strength values were statistically similar in overall evaluation for all groups (p > .05). In segmental evaluation, group 1 revealed the highest bond strength in apical one-third compared to other groups (p < .05).     

Correlation between sealer penetration into dentinal tubules and bond strength of two new calcium silicate-based and an epoxy resin-based,endodontic sealer

The relationship between sealer penetration into dentinal tubules and the bond strength of two new calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers was evaluated. Thirty recently extracted human maxillary incisors were instrumented and divided into three groups according to the sealer used: (1) AH Plus; (2) iRoot SP; and (3) MTA Fillapex. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules was measured using CLSM. Then, a universal testing machine was used to compare the push-out bond strengths of the sealers to the root canal dentin. AH Plus and MTA Fillapex exhibited significantly higher sealer penetration than iRoot SP did (p > .05). The push-out bond strengths of AH Plus and iRoot SP were higher than that of MTA Fillapex. We concluded that greater penetration of the sealer into the dentinal tubules was not associated with higher bond strength among the three sealers tested.     

Evaluation of different desensitizing agents effect on shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin

Desensitizing agents can inhibit the bonding strength between dentin and adhesive resin cement. This study evaluated the effects of different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin. Sixty freshly extracted and caries free teeth were classified into five experimental groups, randomly (n?=?12). Each group was treated with a different desensitizing agent (Teethmate, Shield Force Plus, Admira Protect and Ultra-Ez) respectively, except for an untreated control group. After desensitizing agents and adhesive resin cement were applied to each dentin surface, all specimens were stored in incubator at 37?°C for 24?h. The shear bond strength was tested with a Universal testing machine at a 0.5?mm/min crosshead speed. Data were analysed by using a statistical software (SPSS 22). The results of the measurements were analysed by Kruskal Wallis test with Bonferroni correction and multiple comparisons were made by Wilcoxon test (p???.01). Specimens were examined by a scanning electron microscope, additionally. The Shield Force Plus showed significantly the highest shear bond strength compared with other groups (p?<?.01). Ultra-Ez showed the lowest shear bond strength (p?>?.01). There was no significant difference among Teethmate and Admira Protect groups (p?>?.01). Desensitizing agents containing resin monomers increased the bonding strength, however desensitizers containing calcium phosphate, potassium nitrate and fluoride did not effect the bonding strength of resin cement to dentin.     

Adhesive bond strength and compressive strength of a novel bulk fill composite with zirconia nano-hybrid filler

The aim of the study was to investigate the adhesive bond and compressive strength of novel bulk fill resin composite with zirconia (Zr) nano-hybrid filler. Sixty molars were mounted in acrylic resin with flat occlusal surface. Half of the specimen (n = 30) were bonded using total etch (TE) and the other half with self-etch (SE) technique. Specimens treated with SE (n = 30) and TE (n = 30) bonding protocol were divided into three groups, based on the type of bulk fill build-up materials (ZC–ZirconCore, MC–MulticCore Flow and LC–Luxacore Dual), resulting in six study groups [MC-TE, MC-SE, LC-TE, LC-SE, ZC-TE, ZC-SE]. Cylindrical (3 × 3 mm) build-ups were performed followed by shear bond strength testing (crosshead speed-1 mm/min). Ten specimens for each bulk fill build-up material (MC, LC and ZC) were prepared for compressive strength testing. All specimens were tested for maximum failure loads (crosshead speed?0.5 cm/min). Analysis of variance and paired t-test were performed to statistically analyze the data. TE technique showed significantly higher bond strength values as compared to SE technique (p < 0.001) for all three materials (MC, LC and ZC). Shear bond strength for MC [TE,17.88(2.00)-SE,9.43(0.98)] and LC [TE,18.91(2.57)-SE,6.35(1.12)] groups were significantly higher than ZC group [TE,13.99(1.09)-SE,4.61(0.84)]. Specimens in ZC group (266.73 ± 9.76) showed significantly higher compressive strength in comparison to MC (247.66 ± 9.72) (p = 0.004) and LC (249.87 ± 13.17) (p < 0.001) groups. Zirconia nano-hybrid filler resin bulk fill material has comparatively high compressive strength and low bond strength making them suitable for clinical applications in the posterior region with favorable conditions for adhesive bonding.     

Effect of adhesive type and composite viscosity on the dentin bond strength

Objectives: Evaluate the influence of composite resins viscosity and type of cure of the adhesive systems on the bond strength of composite resins submitted to artificial aging.

Methods: Dentin specimens (n = 240) were divided into 2 groups: Group GC: GrandioSO, and Group GF: GrandioSO Heavy Flow. These groups were subdivided into 6: FM: Futurabond M – light cured, FDCC: Futurabond Dual Cure – chemical cured, FDCL: Futurabond Dual Cure – light cured, CS3: Clearfil S3 – light cured, CDCC: Clearfil Dual Cure – chemical cured, and CDCL: Clearfil Dual Cure – light cured. Resin blocks were build up on the dentin surface. Half of samples on each group were cut to obtain resin/dentin sticks (1 × 1 mm). The other half was first submitted to thermomechanical aging. The dentin/resin sticks were submitted to microtensile bond strength test and the results were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 5%).

Results: ANOVA showed significant influence for adhesive (p = 0.0000) and aging (p = 0.0001). No significant influence of the composite viscosity on bond strength was observed (ANOVA: p = 0.0861). For adhesive, the results of Tukey’s test (MPa) were CDCC: 13.44 (±5.13)a; FM: 14,01 (±2.71)a; CDCL: 14.51 (±4.98)a; FDCC: 18.66 (±7.13)b; CS3: 18.80 (±6.50)b; FDCL: 19.18 (±7.39)b. For aging: AGED: 14.99 (±6.32)a; NOT AGED: 17.87 (±5.97)b.

Conclusion: Composite resin viscosities did not influence on the bond strength. Type of cure of the adhesives had influence on the bond strength. Thermomechanical aging decreased the bond strength.     

Effects of different surface treatments of zirconia on the bond strength of self-adhesive resinous cement

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different zirconia surface treatments on the bond strength of two self-adhesive resinous cements (SARC).

Methods: Two hundred and eight cylindrical specimens were obtained from Y-TZP zirconia (half with diameter 3.2 mm and half with 4.8 mm). After sintering and polishing, specimens were divided into four groups (n = 26), according to surface treatment: Control (no treatment); Sandblasting (Al₂O₃ particles); Rocatec (Al₂O₃ particles, tribochemical silica coating and silane application); Laser (Nd: YAG laser: 20 Hz, 100 mJ, 0.2 J/cm²). The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated after the surface treatments, and the groups were divided into two subgroups (n = 13), according to the SARC tested: RelyX U200 and Bifix SE. The 2.2-mm cylinders were bonded to 4.8-mm cylinders and stressed until failure under shear using a universal testing machine. Bond strength and Ra were analyzed using ANOVA, and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).

Results: Surface treatment was significant (p < 0.0001), but cement type (p = 0.73) was not. Related to roughness, significant differences were found for the treatment type (p < 0.0001), with laser being the treatment with higher Ra values.

Conclusions: Nd:YAG laser produced a rougher surface and a higher bond strength compared with sandblasting, silicatization, and control groups.     

Evaluation of a new test method to determine the failure mode and macro-shear bond strength of dental materials to metals

Objective: To compare the macro mean shear bond strength (SBS) and failure mode of three cements to two types of metal using mould-enclosed and non-enclosed cement specimens. Methods: Titanium and base metal cobalt-based substrates were finished with 50 μm aluminium oxide. Two resin-modified glass-ionomers (Riva Luting Plus, Fuji Plus) and one resin cement (RelyX Unicem) were prepared as per manufacturers’ instructions. Metal mould-enclosed and non-enclosed cement specimens with a bonding area diameter of 3.5?mm were prepared and stressed to failure using a 2 mm blunt edge shear knife at a cross-head speed of 1?mm/min to determine mean SBS. The shear knife was placed against the surface of the substrate. Failure analysis of the failed interface was performed with a stereo microscope at 40× magnification. Results: Two-way Analysis of Variance demonstrated a significant difference in mean SBS between materials (p?=?0.004) and cement (p?=?0.001). There was also a significant interaction between method and cement on SBS, F(2,?170)?=?7.209, p?=?0.003. Post hoc Tukey tests demonstrated no significant difference for either resinmodified glass-ionomer cements (RMGIC) (p?=?0.864, p?=?0.620) when comparing non-enclosed and mould-enclosed test methods bonded to titanium. There was however a significant difference (p?<?0.001) between the mean SBS obtained for the resin cement when comparing the non-enclosed and mould-enclosed test methods. For base metal, the RMGIC’s SBS was higher than resin cement but no difference was observed between one of RMGIC’s and the resin cement non-enclosed mean SBS. Although not the case for RMGIC’s bonded to titanium or one RMGIC bonded to non-precious cobalt-based metal, when comparing the test method on each cement, RMGIC and the resin cement showed significant differences between non- and mould-enclosed specimens mean SBS. In the non-enclosed specimen tests, 71% of all specimens tested exhibited adhesive failure, which was statistically different (p?<?0.001) to 91% for the mould-enclosed specimens. Failure mode was not always statistically different within groups, however non-enclosed specimens showed higher frequencies of mixed failures. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, significant differences were found in comparing the mean SBS between mould-enclosed and non-enclosed specimens. A significant difference was found in failure mode between mould-enclosed and non-mould enclosed specimens. Mould-enclosed specimens bonded to metal exhibited a higher frequency of adhesive failure than non-mould enclosed specimens. Relevance: Mould-enclosed specimens used in place of non-enclosed specimens can be used in SBS testing to give a more valid result when bonding to metal.     

Influence of surface energy parameters of dental self-adhesive resin cements on bond strength to dentin

The purpose of this study was to determine the surface energy parameters of dental self-adhesive resin cements (SRCs) and to measure their bond strength to dentin. Six dental SRCs (RelyX Unicem Clicker, RU; Maxcem Elite, ME; BisCem, BC; Clearfil SA Luting, SA; Multilink Speed, MS; seT PP, SP) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RelyX Luting 2, RL; control) were tested. Smear layer-covered bovine dentin was used as bonding substrate. Using the dynamic sessile drop method, surface energy, surface energy components, degree of hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity (expressed as ΔG _sws using thermodynamic notation), and apparent surface energies for each material were calculated. The luting cements were bonded to the dentin and stored in water at 37?°C for 24?h prior to shear bond strength test (n?=?10). Pearson correlation analysis was applied to detect possible correlations between surface energy parameters and measured shear bond strength (α?=?0.05). RU, SA, and MS produced negative ΔG _sws values (hydrophobic), whereas ME, BC, SP, and RL yielded positive ones (hydrophilic). RU had the highest value among all six SRCs tested, the value for MS being statistically equivalent (p?=?0.785). The base component, ΔG _sws, and surface energy determined with water showed significant negative linear correlations with dentin bond strength (r/p?=??0.801/0.030, ?0.900/0.006, and ?0.892/0.007, respectively). These results suggest that bonding to smear layer-covered bovine dentin was governed by the base component and the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the SRCs.     

The effect of MDP-based primer on shear bond strength of various cements to two different ceramic materials

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based primer on the shear bond strengths of thermally aged self-adhesive and conventional adhesive resin cements and zinc phosphate cement to zirconia and lithium disilicate substructures. Sixty zirconia (Z) and 60 lithium disilicate (L) disk specimens were cut from ceramic blocks. Each group was divided into six subgroups (n = 10). Half of the specimens of each ceramic group were treated with primer (P) and the other half was remained untreated. Three types of cement were applied: zinc phosphate cement [(ZPC) (Hoffmann Harmonic Shades)]; self-adhesive resin cement [(SAC) (RelyX U200)]; conventional adhesive resin cement [(CAC) (C&B)]. The specimens were subjected to thermal aging procedure for 1 week under 37 °C water bath. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed with three-way (ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons and interactions between groups were analyzed by using Tukey’s simultaneous confidence intervals. There was no significant difference between the SBS values of SAC-Z (11,47 ± 0,47) and SAC-ZP (11,39 ± 0,42) (p > 0.05). However, the SBS values of SAC-L (12.34 ± 0,55) and SAC-LP (12,50 ± 0,49) were significantly higher than those of SAC-Z and SAC-ZP (p < 0.00). The use of primer significantly increased the SBS value of CAC-ZP (8,05 ± 0,55) when compared to the SBS value of CAC-Z (3,53 ± 0,41) (p < 0.00). Resin cement that contains methacrylate monomers with phosphoric ester functional groups exhibited reliable bond to zirconia. However, the use of an MDP-based primer may not further improve its bond strength.     

Shear bond strength of PEEK and PEEK-30GF cemented to zirconia or titanium substrates

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of dual-cure resin cement to promote the bonding between a veneering PEEK and zirconia or titanium surfaces.

Materials and methods: The surface of titanium and sintered zirconia disks were gritblasted, ultra-sonically cleaned in distilled water, and dryed by oil-free air. Then, a adhesive system was applied on the clean and dry surfaces. Disks of PEEK or 30% glass-reinforced PEEK were cut from a rod and their surface were acid etched and therefore the PEEK roughness was analysed using a contact profilometer. A resin cement was then applied between the substrates and the veneering PEEK and light cured for 4 Shear bond strength tests were performed on PEEK-cement to zirconia or titanium interfaces. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were performed to evaluate the samples surface, interface and failure mode.

Results: Surface treatment with acid etching decreased the average roughness of PEEK-based surfaces. oMicroscopic analyses by SEM revealed morphological aspects of a poor bonding between the resin-based cement and PEEK. Those aspects could be confirmed by the low mean values in shear bond strength. The fracture analysis showed that the main failure mode was adhesive, which explain the low values of shear bond strength.

Conclusion: PEEK is a promising material for dental applications. However, significant improvements on surface modifications and in chemical composition of the cement are still required for dental applications involving cementation of PEEK or PEEK-30GF to zirconia or titanium concerning a desirable long-term clinical performance of prosthetic structures.     

Absence of correlation of hydrogen bond donor ability with acid strength and catalytic activity of acid catalysts

Two liquids, acetic acid and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), and two solids, silica gel and polymethacrylic acid (PMA), were compared for hydrogen bond donor ability, acid strength, and catalytic activity in typical acid‐catalyzed reactions, inversion of sugar and cleavage of acetone dimethyl ketal. In each pair, the weaker acid (HFIP and silica gel, respectively) was much the stronger hydrogen bond donor, but was totally devoid of catalytic activity, which the poor hydrogen bond donor but stronger acids (acetic and methacrylic acid, respectively) exhibited. A strong hydrogen bond donor (e.g., HFIP) enhances, however, the catalytic activity of the acid catalyst (AcOH). Thus, hydrogen bond donor ability is not a measure of acid strength. A correlation of the two properties is possible only when each group (acids and bases) involved in the comparison consists of very close structural relatives. Such a correlation cannot be extrapolated to any other case. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity disinfectant on microtensile bond strength of tooth-coloured restorative materials to sound and caries-affected dentin

This study evaluated the effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-based cavity disinfectant (CHX) on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and packable resin composite to sound and caries-affected dentin. Sound and occlusal caries-affected human third molars (N?=?36, n?=?3 per group) were randomly divided into three experimental groups to receive one of the following restorative materials. (a) Glass ionomer (Ketac Molar, 3 M ESPE; GI), (b) resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer, 3 M ESPE; RMGI) and (c) packable resin composite (Surefil, Dentsply; PRC) with a bonding agent (Prime Bond NT, Dentsply De Trey). Caries was removed using a caries-detecting dye (Caries Detector, Kuraray Medical Ltd.) and flat dentin surfaces were achieved by finishing up to 1200-grit silicon carbide abrasive. Half of the teeth in each group received 2% CHX (Consepsis, Ultradent). Dentin surfaces were built-up with the respective materials incrementally and were sectioned with a slow-speed saw into multiple beams. The beams were subjected to μTBS test (0.5 mm/min) in a Universal Testing Machine. The data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s tests. For each restorative material, μTBS results were not affected by the application of CHX (p?>?0.05) on both sound and caries-affected dentin (p?>?0.05). PRC in combination with the corresponding bonding agent showed significantly higher results (p?<?0.05) than those of GI and RMGI, on sound and caries-affected teeth, respectively. Cohesive failure in dentin was not observed in any of the groups. The use of 2% chlorhexidine-based cavity disinfectant did not impair the adhesion of the restorative materials tested to either sound or caries-affected dentin.     

Bond strength and durability of universal adhesive agents with lithium disilicate ceramics: A shear bond strength study

The aim was to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of lithium disilicate (LD) ceramic to resin composite with different universal adhesives, duration of ageing and silane. One hundred and twenty LD ceramic discs were processed, fired and etched (HF acid 5%) for 20 s (sec). All specimens were divided into 12 groups (n = 10), based on different combinations of, 3 different universal adhesives [Scotchbond (SB) Universal Adhesive, All-Bond (AB) Universal, and Futurabond U (FU)], silane and different duration of ageing [24 h and 3 months]. Composite resin cylinders (Tetric ceram) (3mm × 2 mm) were formed using bonding jig on ceramic and were light-cured. The specimens in groups 1–6 and 7–12 were stored in distilled water (37 °C) for 24 h and 3 months (thermocycling -5000 cycles 5–55 °C/30 s dwell time) before being subjected to bond strength testing respectively. Using universal testing machine shear bond test was performed at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Failure modes and fracture patterns were assessed using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. Analysis of variance was performed to analyze data. SBS was significantly higher with silane than without silane (p < 0.01), regardless of the type of adhesive or storage duration. Specimens tested at 24 h storage showed significantly higher (p < 0.01) SBS than specimens tested after 3-months. A comparison among different universal adhesives showed significantly distinct bond strength (p < 0.01). Optimal bonds to LD were achieved by application of silane. While ageing through storage had a negative impact on the SBS, it varied among different adhesives.     

Microtensile bond strength of composite-to-composite repair with different surface treatments and adhesive systems

Objectives: The purpose was to investigate the effect of different surface treatments and bonding agents on the repair bond strength of different resin-based restorative materials by microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing protocol. Materials and Methods: 24 Grandio SO(VOCO) and 24 Filtek Z250(3?M) resin composite blocks were prepared. Half of the samples (N?=?12) were diamond bur-roughened and the other half (N?=?12) were sandblasted by 50?μm aluminum oxide particles. They were further divided into four sub-groups (n?=?3) and received the following: Sub-Group1: Adper Single Bond2 (Etch&Rinse) (3?M); Sub-Group2: Clearfil SE (Self-etch) (Kuraray); Sub-Group3: Beauty Bond (HEMA-free all-in-one) (Shofu); Sub-Group4: All Bond3 (HEMA-free, hydrophobic, etch&rinse) (Bisco). The samples were repaired by Filtek Z250 to form a block. All of the resultant sub-groups combinations consisted of one of the composite type, surface treatment type, and adhesive systems. A total of 18 groups were prepared including 2 homogeneous blocks. They were thermocycled and μTBS measurements were performed. Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: The experimental regroups’ μTBS reached to 34.67–66.36% and 43.44–95.52% of the cohesive bond strength for Grandio SO and Z250, respectively. The pre-existing composite type is found to be statistically important. When the surface is bur-finished Grandio performed better; when air-abrasion is considered Z250 showed higher bond strength. All-in-one adhesive system produced the weakest bond strength at all parameters. Conclusion: It may be suggested that when the pre-existing composite is unknown, air-abrasion may be performed with etch&rinse or two-step self-etch adhesives.     

Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite

Purpose: To evaluate the wetting ability and the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems in various depths of dentin. Materials and Method: 48 extracted human molars cut in half in buccolingual direction. Buccal and lingual surfaces were used to obtain deep (n = 48) and superficial (n = 48) dentin. Groups were divided into 4 subgroups: Self-etch (CSE), etch&rinse (SB), multi-mode self-etch (SAU) and multimode etch&rinse (EAU) adhesive systems. 3 consecutive contact-angle measurements were obtained: T0- 3 μl drop of distilled water on dentin; T1-Droplet of the adhesive; T2- Distilled water after polymerization of the adhesive. After composite build-ups, microtensile measurements were performed. Contact angle data were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measures. Bond strength data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance, comparisons were made according to the logarithmic values (p < 0.05). Results: The difference between groups was not significant regardless of dentin depth for all measurements (p < 0.05). All groups except CSE enhanced the wetting ability of the adhesive but reduced the wetting ability of distilled water after application of the adhesive (p < 0.05). Regarding adhesive systems, the groups showed no significant difference between bond strengths to various depths of dentin except SAU (p > 0.05); in SAU, bond strength to deep dentine were significantly higher than superficial dentin (p < 0.05). Regarding adhesives’ bond strength, CSE showed significantly greater values than the other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The cavity depth does not affect the bonding ability for all adhesive systems; self-etch adhesive systems might be a better choice since different adhesives may influence the wetting ability and microtensile bond strength of the dentin substrates.