Effects of compatibility between tackifier and polymer on adhesion property and phase structure: Tackifier‐added polystyrene‐based triblock/diblock copolymer blend system

The effects of compatibility of tackifier with polymer matrix and mixing weight ratio of triblock/diblock copolymers as the matrix on the adhesion property and phase structure of tackifier‐added polystryrene triblock/diblock copolymer blends were investigated. For this purpose, polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene triblock and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene diblock copolymers were used and the diblock weight ratio in the blend was varied from 0 to 1. Spherical polystyrene domains with a mean size of about 20 nm were dispersed in the polyisoprene (PI) continuous phase. In the case of the hydrogenated cycloaliphatic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with PI and a poor compatibility with polystyrene, the peel strength increased with an increase of the tackifier content, and the degree of increase became significant above 40 wt % of tackifier. It was found that the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier in the PI matrix were formed and the distance between the nearest neighbors of agglomerates was about 15 nm from SAXS measurement. The peel strength increased with an increase of the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier from TEM observation. On the other hand, in the case of the rosin phenolic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with both polystyrene and PI, the peel strength increased effectively at the lower tackifier content, while no significant increase at higher tackifier content was observed. The agglomerates of tackifier were never confirmed in this system. The higher peel strength was obtained at the diblock weight ratio in the blend of 0.5–0.7 for both tackifier‐added systems. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Tack and Shear Strength of Adhesives Prepared from Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SBR) Using Gum Rosin and Petro Resin as Tackifiers

Tack and shear strength of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR)-based pressure-sensitive adhesive were studied using gum rosin and petro resin as the tackifiers. The concentration of the tackifying resin was varied from 0 to 100 parts per hundred parts of rubber (phr). Toluene was used as the solvent throughout the experiment. The rolling ball technique was used to measure the tack of the adhesive, whereas, shear strength was determined by a TA-HDi Texture Analyser. Results show that the tack of the adhesive increases with increasing tackifier loadings for both tackifier systems. However, shear strength indicates the reverse behavior with increasing resin content, an observation which is attributed to the decrease in cohesive strength as the tackifier concentration is increased. Both tack and shear strength of the adhesives increases with molecular weight of SBR. Adhesive containing petro resin consistently exhibits higher values than the gum rosin system due to better wettability and compatibility in the former system.     

The effect of tackifier on phase structure and peel adhesion of a triblock copolymer pressure-sensitive adhesive

The role of tackifier on the adhesive properties of pressure-sensitive adhesive tape was investigated. For this purpose, a model system consisting of polystyrene-b-polyisoprene-b-polystyrene triblock copolymer and a tackifier was prepared. The hydrogenated cyclo-aliphatic resin, such as tackifier, which has poor compatibility with polystyrene increased the peel adhesion significantly. The increase became stronger above 40 wt% tackifier. Nanometer-sized agglomerates of tackifier were found in the polyisoprene matrix and these agglomerates increased in number with an increase in the tackifier content. The higher peel adhesion was obtained in the system with the larger amount of agglomerates of tackifier in the polyisoprene matrix. It was estimated that the tackifier dissolved with initial mixing at the molecular level in the polyisoprene matrix, enhancing the wettability of the adhesive, and separated out in the form of agglomerates over time, developing the cohesive strength. On the other hand, the rosin phenolic resin tackifier had good compatibility with polystyrene, and the peel adhesion increased effectively at the lower tackifier content. However, no significant additional increase at higher tackifier content was observed.     

Effects of hydrocarbon tackifiers on the adhesive properties of contact adhesives based on polychloroprene - III. The effect of the molecular weight of the tackifier

Aromatic hydrocarbon resins with different molecular weights (M_w = 1300-50400 daltons) were added to a solvent-based polychloroprene adhesive. The hydrocarbon resins were characterized using infra-red (IR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements. The properties and compatibility of the polychloroprene/resin blends were studied using mechanical tests, DSC measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and stress-controlled rheology. Tack measurements were also carried out and the adhesion strength was obtained from T-peel tests on roughened styrene-butadiene rubber/polychloroprene adhesive joints. The addition of low-molecular-weight tackifiers produced a compatible polychloroprene/tackifier system (only one T_g was found in DSC measurements), while the addition of a high-molecular-weight (and broad molecular weight distribution) tackifier produced a partially incompatible system (two Tg's were found in DSC measurements). The compatibility of polychloroprene/tackifier blends was also assessed with stress-controlled rheology and SEM. An increase in the T-peel strength and tack were produced when the molecular weight of the tackifier increased, although the addition of a hydrocarbon resin with a M_w higher than about 50 000 reduced the tack. A broad molecular weight distribution in the tackifier favoured incompatibility with the polychloroprene, resulting in a reduction in the tack and rheological properties.     

Effects of the compatibility of a polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier blend on the phase structure and tack of a pressure‐sensitive adhesive

Adhesion and viscoelastic properties and morphology of a polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier blend were investigated. Special rosin ester resins with different weight average molecular weights of 650, 710, 890, and 2160 were used as the tackifier and blended with a polyacrylic block copolymer consisting of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(n‐butyl acrylate) blocks at tackifier content levels of 10, 30, and 50 wt %. The compatibility decreased with an increase in molecular weight. From TEM observation, the number of formed agglomerates of the tackifier with sizes on the order of several tens of nanometers increased with increasing tackifier content and molecular weight of the tackifier in the range from 650 to 890. For the tackifier with a molecular weight of 2160, micrometer‐sized agglomerates were observed. The storage modulus at low temperature and the glass transition temperature of adhesive measured by a dynamic mechanical analysis increased dependent on the number of formed nanometer sized agglomerates. Tack was measured using a rolling cylinder tack tester over wide temperature and rolling rate ranges, and master curves were prepared in accordance with the time‐temperature superposition law. Tack and peel strength were optimum at a blend combination of intermediate compatibility, i.e., the molecular weight of 890. These optimum properties were correlated to maximal values of the storage modulus at room temperature and the glass transition temperature. Therefore, it was found that these features of blend properties are strongly affected by the nanometer sized agglomerates of tackifier. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Characterization of eva-based adhesives containing different amounts of rosin ester or polyterpene tackifier

Different amounts (50-170 php--parts per hundred parts of EVA, 33-63 wt%) of two tackifiers (hydrogenated rosin ester, polyterpene resin) were added to an ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer containing 28 wt% vinyl acetate. The EVA and the tackifier were characterized using infrared (IR) spectroscopy, DSC measurements, and stress-controlled plate-plate rheology. The properties and compatibility of the EVA-tackifier mixtures were studied using DSC, DMTA, and stress-controlled plate-plate rheology. Immediate adhesion was measured as a quantification of tack, and the T-peel strength of roughened styrene-butadiene rubber/EVA-tackifier adhesive joints was also obtained. The increase in the amount of tackifier noticeably changed the crystallinity of polyethylene blocks in the EVA, and the temperature at the cross-over between the curves of the storage and loss moduli as a function of the temperature was displaced to a lower value. Whereas the hydrogenated rosin ester was compatible with the amorphous ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer regions of the EVA (Tg value increased) reducing its crystallinity, the polyterpene resin was compatible with the polyethylene blocks of the EVA (T g value was not modified), increasing its crystallinity. Immediate adhesion of the EVA-tackifier mixtures was improved by adding both hydrogenated rosin ester and polyterpene tackifiers. On the other hand, there was an optimum tackifier content at which the maximum T-peel strength value was obtained.     

CHARACTERIZATION OF EVA-BASED ADHESIVES CONTAINING DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF ROSIN ESTER OR POLYTERPENE TACKIFIER

Different amounts (50-170 php--parts per hundred parts of EVA, 33-63 wt%) of two tackifiers (hydrogenated rosin ester, polyterpene resin) were added to an ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer containing 28 wt% vinyl acetate. The EVA and the tackifier were characterized using infrared (IR) spectroscopy, DSC measurements, and stress-controlled plate-plate rheology. The properties and compatibility of the EVA-tackifier mixtures were studied using DSC, DMTA, and stress-controlled plate-plate rheology. Immediate adhesion was measured as a quantification of tack, and the T-peel strength of roughened styrene-butadiene rubber/EVA-tackifier adhesive joints was also obtained. The increase in the amount of tackifier noticeably changed the crystallinity of polyethylene blocks in the EVA, and the temperature at the cross-over between the curves of the storage and loss moduli as a function of the temperature was displaced to a lower value. Whereas the hydrogenated rosin ester was compatible with the amorphous ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer regions of the EVA (Tg value increased) reducing its crystallinity, the polyterpene resin was compatible with the polyethylene blocks of the EVA (T g value was not modified), increasing its crystallinity. Immediate adhesion of the EVA-tackifier mixtures was improved by adding both hydrogenated rosin ester and polyterpene tackifiers. On the other hand, there was an optimum tackifier content at which the maximum T-peel strength value was obtained.     

Influences of debonding rate and temperature on tack properties and peel behavior of polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier system

The influences of debonding rate and temperature on the peel behavior of polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier system were investigated. Poly(methyl methacrylate)-block-poly(n-butyl acrylate)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymer (MAM) with hard block contents of 23 (MAM-23) and 16 wt.% (MAM-16) and a 1/1 blend with a diblock copolymer (MA) consisting of the same components (MAM-23/MA, total hard block content of 15 wt.%) were used as the base polymer. A special rosin ester was used as a tackifier at various contents in the block copolymer/tackifier system. The peeling process at the probe/adhesive interface during probe tack testing was observed using a high-speed microscope at 23 °C with debonding rate of 10 mm/s. Three different peeling mechanisms were observed. Type A, where peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe without cavitation (MAM-23). Type B, where peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe with cavitation (MAM-16). Type C, where cavitation occurred over the entire adhesive layer, and peeling initiation was delayed (MAM-23/MA). The peel behavior of MAM-23 changed from Type A to Type B with a decrease of the debonding rate (1 mm/s) or increase of the temperature (40 °C). In contrast, there was no change for MAM-16 and MAM-23/MA. Cavity formation in an adhesive layer restrains peeling; therefore, it is desirable for improvement of the adhesion strength. The tack properties increased with the tackifier content, and the formation of cavitation was less than that for the systems without the tackifier.     

Effect of natural and synthetic tackifiers on viscosities,adhesion properties and thermal stability of SNR and DPNR solution adhesives

Styrene-grafted natural rubber (SNR) and deproteinized natural rubber (DPNR) latexes were formulated with coumarone-indene (CI), gum rosin and petro resin (PR) tackifiers into solution adhesives with toluene as a solvent. The solution viscosities were evaluated by a Brookfield viscometer DV-II Plus with spindle No. 3. Pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) films were made and the adhesion properties were evaluated with loop tack, peel strength and shear strength tests. Thermal stability of the film was evaluated via Perkin-Elmer Pyris 6^TM thermogravimetric analysis at temperatures ranging from 30 to 600?°C at a heating rate of 10?°C per minute in nitrogen environment. Results indicate that as the tackifiers content increased, the solution viscosities increased with SNR/PR and DPNR/PR formulations showing the highest viscosities. Adhesion test also indicates that loop tack and peel strength of the adhesive solution increased but their shear strength decreased; increase of CI tackifier loadings conferred the highest peel strength for both SNR- and DPNR-based PSAs. Thermal analyses show that the addition of 40 phr CI tackifiers improved thermal stability of SNR adhesives based on their higher T_max and integral procedural decomposition temperature properties.     

Relation between phase structure and peel adhesion of poly(styrene-isoprene-styrene) triblock copolymer/tackifier blend system

The effect of tackifier on the adhesive properties of a model pressure-sensitive adhesive tape was investigated. For this purpose, a model system consisting of poly(styrene-isoprene-styrene) triblock copolymer as the base polymer and a typical aliphatic petroleum resin as the tackifier was prepared. The tackifier content ranged from 10 to 60 wt%. The tackifier used has a good compatibility with polyisoprene, whereas it has a poor compatibility with polystyrene. The 180° peel adhesion was measured. The peel adhesion increased with the tackifier content, while the degree of increase became more significant above 40 wt%. The pressure sensitivity appeared obviously and the maximum peel adhesion was obtained without heating above 40 wt%. The phase structure was determined using pulse ¹H-NMR, transmission electron microscopy and dynamic mechanical analysis. A phase structure in which spherical polystyrene domains with a mean size of about 20 nm were dispersed in the polyisoprene continuous phase was observed. It was found that the tackifier-rich phase of the order of nanometers in size was formed in the polyisoprene matrix and the concentration increased with the tackifier content. The tackifier-rich phase seemed to develop the cohesive strength and, thus, it increased the peel adhesion.     

增粘树脂对聚丙烯酸酯压敏胶粘合性能的影响

聚丙烯酸酯乳液和增粘树脂松香、Ｃ_５石油树脂乳液共混，用共混液涂布成压敏胶带。考察了不同增粘树脂用量对压敏胶带粘合性能的影响。结果表明，随松香树脂量增加，１８０℃剥离强度提高，并出现峰值；快粘力不变；持粘力下降。随Ｃ_５石油树脂量增加，１８０°剥离强度，快粘力，持粘力均大幅度下降。     

改性松香季戊四醇酯在热熔压敏胶中的应用研究

以松香季戊四醇酯、歧化松香季戊四醇酯和氢化松香季戊四醇酯作增粘树脂,研究了它们对热熔压敏胶（HMPSA）外观、力学性能和使用温度范围的影响。结果表明,改性松香季戊四醇树脂与热塑性弹性体SBS具有良好的相容性;对HMPSA初粘性影响大小依次为含歧化松香季戊四醇酯＞含氢化松香季戊四醇酯＞含松香季戊四醇酯;180°剥离强度大小依次为含氢化松香季戊四醇酯＞含松香季戊四醇酯＞含歧化松香季戊四醇酯;持粘性均大于48 h。含氢化松香季戊四醇酯HMPSA的使用温度范围最宽。     

Influence of diblock addition on tack in a polyacrylic triblock copolymer/tackifier system measured using a probe tack test

The influence of diblock copolymer addition on the tack properties of a polyacrylic triblock copolymer/tackifier system was investigated. For this purpose, poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(n‐butyl acrylate)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymer (MAM) and a 1/1 blend with a diblock copolymer consisting of the same components (MA) were used as base polymers, and a tackifier was added in amounts ranging from 10 to 30 wt %. The temperature dependence of tack was measured by a probe tack test. The tack of MAM/MA at room temperature was significantly higher than that of MAM, and the improvement of MAM/MA upon the addition of the tackifier was higher than that of MAM. The peeling process at the probe/adhesive interface during the probe tack test was observed using a high‐speed microscope. It was found that for MAM/MA, cavitation was caused in the entire adhesive layer, and peeling initiation was delayed by the absorption of strain energy due to deformation of the adhesive layer. In contrast, for MAM, peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe. The greater flexibility of the soft block chain in the diblock copolymer resulted in improved interfacial adhesion. ¹H pulse nuclear magnetic resonance analysis showed that the addition of the tackifier improved the cohesive strength of the adhesive. Adhesion strength is affected by two factors: the development of interfacial adhesion and cohesive strength. In the MAM/MA/tackifier system, the presence of MA and the tackifier improved the interfacial adhesion and cohesive strength, respectively. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Peel adhesion and viscoelasticity of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate)-based hot melt adhesives. I. The effect of tackifier compatibility

A series of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA)-based hot melt adhesives containing either a rosin or a hydrocarbon (C5–C9) tackifier have been prepared to investigate viscoelastic properties and peel adhesion. Fracture energies were determined by the use of a T-Peel geometry (two polypropylene films bonded with model EVA adhesives). The rosin has only one glass transition temperature, but the C5–C9 resin has two glass transition temperatures, indicating phase separation. The rosin has better compatibility with EVA than does the C5–C9 resin. The bond strength of tackified EVA to polypropylene depends not only on compatibility, but also on viscoelastic properties. A higher storage modulus results in a higher T-Peel strength. Under certain test conditions, glassy C5–C9-rich domains act as reinforcing filler, resulting in a higher storage modulus. Here, a C5–C9-tackified EVA adhesive has higher T-Peel strength than does one containing rosin. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Influence of the vinyl acetate content and the tackifier nature on the rheological,thermal, and adhesion properties of EVA adhesives

Three ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers with different vinyl acetate (VA) contents (28-40 wt%) were mixed with rosin ester and polyterpene resin tackifiers in a 1 : 1 (weight/weight) ratio. The rheological and thermal properties of the tackifiers were determined and the use of rheological measurements as a precise way to measure the softening point of the tackifiers is proposed. The glass transition temperature of the tackifiers was obtained from the second heating run, after the thermal history of the tackifiers was removed. The addition of the rosin ester to EVA produced a compatible mixture, whereas for the terpene resin a less compatible mixture was obtained. The increase in the VAamount decreased the crystallinity of EVAand both the storage and the loss moduli also decreased, but the peel strength and the immediate adhesion were increased. The immediate adhesion of EVA/tackifier blends was affected by both the compatibility and the rheological properties of the blends. In fact, a relationship between the mechanical storage modulus (E^t′) - obtained from DMTA experiments - of the adhesives and the immediate adhesion to thin rubber substrates was obtained. The adhesives containing the T tackifier showed higher moduli than those containing the G tackifier, and therefore higher peel strength values were obtained. An increase in the VA content increased the flexibility of the adhesives and thus a decrease in peel strength was obtained.     

Effect of tackifiers on mechanical and dynamic properties of carbon‐black‐filled NR vulcanizates

This work focuses on the effect of tackifiers on mechanical and dynamic properties of carbon‐black‐filled vulcanizates. Three types of tackifiers with difference in softening points are selected for study including petroleum resin, phenolic resin, and gum rosin. The effect of tackifiers on the retardation of vulcanization is observed and the changes in mechanical properties due to the reduction in crosslink density are correlated. Good compatibility between natural rubber and all three tackifiers is verified by a single tan‐delta peak detected for each vulcanizate in temperature ramp test. A similar behavior to the Payne effect which usually found in the case of particulate‐filled rubbers is observed for the tackifier‐filled counterparts. The variation of temperature plays a crucial role in the dynamic behavior of tackified vulcanizates since the state of tackifiers determines its function during dynamic straining. As temperature passed through the softening point of a particular tackifier, substantial reduction in elastic response is observed; however, its relative damping to the untackified may still be maintained. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Fundamental Understanding in Rolling Ball Tack of Tackified Block Copolymer Adhesives

In the pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) industry, rolling ball tack is a very common tack test, which is simple, inexpensive and easy to operate. This work attempts to search for key parameter(s), which will affect the rolling ball tack of a PSA based on a blend of styrene-isoprene-styrene triblock copolymer(SIS) and hydrocarbon tackifier(s). We want to better understand whether this particular PSA performance is controlled by the surface or bulk properties of the adhesive.

Firstly, to test the contribution from the surface properties, we employ a model system of SIS/aliphatic tackifier in 1/1 wt. ratio as the control. Part of the tackifier in this PSA is then replaced by various amounts of low molecular weight diluents with different surface tensions. The idea is to vary the surface properties of the PSA because these low surface tension and low molecular weight diluents tend to migrate to the PSA surface. It is observed that the incorporation of a lower surface tension and a lower molecular weight diluent in the PSA tends to produce a larger increase in rolling ball tack compared with the unmodified PSA. On the other hand, the incorporation of a higher surface tension and a more compatible diluent tends to produce a larger increase in loop, peel and quick stick. Each diluent lowers the shear adhesion failure temperature (SAFT) of the diluent-modified PSA. These observations are explained in terms of tackifier molecular weight, and surface tension and compatibility of the various components (polyisoprene, tackifier, diluent and oil) in the adhesive formulation.

Secondly, to test the contribution from the bulk properties, we derive an equation for rolling ball tack in terms of the bulk viscoelastic behavior of the block copolymer PSA. However, experimental values of rolling ball tack do not follow this equation. Also, with increasing tackifier concentration in SIS, rolling ball tack has very different behavior compared with loop, peel, quick stick and probe tack. The latter set of performance criteria is known to be related to PSA bulk viscoelastic behavior. Therefore, these suggest that rolling ball tack is related more to the surface properties than to the bulk properties of the adhesive based on these results and those of the diluent-modified PSA systems.     

Singlet oxygen generation and adhesive loss in stimuli‐responsive,fullerene‐polymer blends,containing polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐polystyrene and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene rubber‐based adhesives

The adhesive properties, as measured by bulk tack and peel strength analysis, were found to decrease in polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐polystyrene (SBS) and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene (SIS) PSA films containing common singlet oxygen generators, acridine, rose bengal, and C₆₀ fullerene, when irradiated with a tungsten halogen light in air. The addition of the singlet oxygen quencher, β‐carotene, to the C₆₀ fullerene samples was found to significantly deter the rate of adhesive loss in the fullerene‐SBS and ‐SIS PSA nanocomposites. The presence of oxygen was essential to the mechanism of adhesive loss and, in combination with the effects of singlet oxygen generators and a singlet oxygen scavenger, strongly supports a singlet‐oxygen mediated process. FTIR investigations of fullerene‐SBS and ‐SIS systems suggest the initial formation of peroxides which, upon further irradiation, lead to the generation of carbonyl‐containing compounds of a ketonic type after crosslinking. Rates of SBS and SIS C‐H abstraction were comparable and found to decrease when the high‐pressure, mercury xenon irradiation source was filtered to allow only light of λ > 390 nm. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Fundamental Understanding in Rolling Ball Tack of Tackified Block Copolymer Adhesives

In the pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) industry, rolling ball tack is a very common tack test, which is simple, inexpensive and easy to operate. This work attempts to search for key parameter(s), which will affect the rolling ball tack of a PSA based on a blend of styrene-isoprene-styrene triblock copolymer(SIS) and hydrocarbon tackifier(s). We want to better understand whether this particular PSA performance is controlled by the surface or bulk properties of the adhesive.

Firstly, to test the contribution from the surface properties, we employ a model system of SIS/aliphatic tackifier in 1/1 wt. ratio as the control. Part of the tackifier in this PSA is then replaced by various amounts of low molecular weight diluents with different surface tensions. The idea is to vary the surface properties of the PSA because these low surface tension and low molecular weight diluents tend to migrate to the PSA surface. It is observed that the incorporation of a lower surface tension and a lower molecular weight diluent in the PSA tends to produce a larger increase in rolling ball tack compared with the unmodified PSA. On the other hand, the incorporation of a higher surface tension and a more compatible diluent tends to produce a larger increase in loop, peel and quick stick. Each diluent lowers the shear adhesion failure temperature (SAFT) of the diluent-modified PSA. These observations are explained in terms of tackifier molecular weight, and surface tension and compatibility of the various components (polyisoprene, tackifier, diluent and oil) in the adhesive formulation.

Secondly, to test the contribution from the bulk properties, we derive an equation for rolling ball tack in terms of the bulk viscoelastic behavior of the block copolymer PSA. However, experimental values of rolling ball tack do not follow this equation. Also, with increasing tackifier concentration in SIS, rolling ball tack has very different behavior compared with loop, peel, quick stick and probe tack. The latter set of performance criteria is known to be related to PSA bulk viscoelastic behavior. Therefore, these suggest that rolling ball tack is related more to the surface properties than to the bulk properties of the adhesive based on these results and those of the diluent-modified PSA systems.     

Effect of molecular weight of epoxidized‐natural rubber on viscosity and tack of pressure‐sensitive adhesives

The effect of molecular weight of rubber on viscosity and loop tack of rubber‐adhesives were studied using two grades of epoxidized‐natural rubber, i.e., ENR 25 and ENR 50. Coumarone–indene resin, gum rosin, and petro resin were used as tackifiers. Toluene was used as the solvent throughout the experiment. The adhesive was coated on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate using a SHEEN hand coater. Viscosity was determined by a HAAKE Rotary Viscometer, whereas loop tack was measured by a Llyod Adhesion Tester operating at 10 cm/min. Results show that viscosity increases gradually upto a critical molecular weight of 6.8 × 10⁴ and 3.9 × 10⁴ for ENR 25 and ENR 50, respectively, before a rapid increase in viscosity is observed. Loop tack indicates maximum value at the respective critical molecular weights for the three tackifiers investigated suggesting the culmination of wettability. For both rubbers, loop tack increases with coating thickness due to the concentration effect of adhesive. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010